I can't believe O'Reilly. I don't understand why people take him and other Fox News characters seriously. But they do, and in large numbers. Can anyone tell me why so many people are fooled by this propaganda. I saw through these guy after the first 5 minutes I ever watched their shows. How do people fall for this? Even intelligent people fall for this. Is it just older people who grew up trusting the media?
@KiwiTomCrawford I know, Bill O'Reilly's sole obsession in life is to call all Muslims actions terrorist. If a Muslim robs a 7-11, it must be terrorism and no other reason.
O'Reilley , what an arrogant twit . He might be one of the worst interviewers on the planet , or the best , as he seems to have guests just to pester them and use his Louder Than Thou bigot attitude . He's right perfect for The Fox Agenda , I guess .
It's not completely relevant to the subject at hand, but I'm glad somebody said it. Nader isn't this genius that people make him out to be. He got famous for demonizing some decent pieces of machinery, but the part they never tell you is that his findings were later proven wrong.
@TBustah It's obvious to anyone who has a good knowledge of automotive design and history that the VW Beetle (I think the Krauts called it the Type 01, officially), had the same basic, swing-arm design, BEFORE the Corvair was ever even conceived on the GM design boards.
It was never demonized in the way that Nadar did with the Corvair, and outsold the GM product by a huge margin, and had equally horrendous handling and performance.
@bonnevie9 All I'm "trying to say" is that people in the comments are saying O'Reilly wasted Nader's time, but Nader is the one who was invited on to talk about one thing, and then proceeded to change the subject, plug his merchandise, and belittle his host's intellect.
Just what about that makes me an asshole? I didn't say it in a rude way. Or is your definition of an asshole just anyone who disagrees with you?
@TBustah Well actually, Nadar was asked to be on the show to discuss how to fundamentally change things in the country for the better. Not to talk about The Fort Hood Massacre, O'Reilly even says he is going to change the subject at the very beginning of the interview in a shameless attempt to try and grab more viewers. Next time, please use your head before you say something completetly ridiculous. Have a nice day, try and read a bit if you can. :) :)
@cantarooots Yes, he DID say that. I'm not arguing that he didn't say it. I'd have to be blind not to see that bright yellow book jacket at the beginning.
Perhaps I should have been more clear: instead of waiting until the last couple minutes of the show to talk about the book, like he was told he could do, he started talking about it almost right away so that he didn't have to answer the questions asked of him.
And he DID belittle O'Reilly's intelligence with that gum-chewing remark.
@TBustah wow man, seriously? Did you do what O'Reilly did before this interview? Spend so much time thinkin of a way to belittle others and induce a reaction for the sake of attention from viewers and try to down size someones image or views? Bill O'Reilly is a TOOL! Did you even LISTEN to what he was saying? of course not cuz hey guys I forgot he only WATCHED the video. "I saw the yellow book so im not blind". "Only rich people can save us!" and "Only genius' like you know what they are saying"
I never said either of those last two things, nor am I the one throwing around harsh words. If anyone's out to belittle anyone or get attention, it's you.
I dont think you understand. Nadar came on the show to discuss his book, not Fort Hood. Also, Bill O'Reilly doesnt have much interlligence to belittle, hes a moron. Agree to disagree, have a good day sir.
@cantarooots Don't talk down to me, I understand perfectly.
It doesn't matter what he WANTED to discuss, it's not what he was invited on to the show for. It was rude and a waste of time for him to just abruptly change the subject like that.
And even if you were right about O'Reilly being a moron, does that make it right for somebody to come onto his show and insult him like that? Would you walk into a classroom full of special ed kids and start shouting "retard"?
@TBustah He was invited on the show to discuss his book, not Fort Hood. Why cant you understand this?
Bill did not stick to the agenda and started discussing issues that Nadar hadnt agreed to talk about. This is why Nadar is upset
No I wouldnt walk into a room of special needs students and yell retard, but if I did, Id still have more class than our boy bill. That is just a ridiculous argument, Bill is a fully functioning adult, with a new program that prides itself on its legitamacy.comeon
@TBustah ...Are you the producer of this show?? How do YOU know what he was invited on the show for?? The guy wrote a book and is obviously on a book promotion tour.... I would bet money that he was scheduled to promote his book. I'm not sure, but my guess is that he was scheduled even before the massacre. But it was the hot subject of the day, so Bill wanted to beat it into the ground. I don't know the answer, but unless you booked Nader for this interview... NEITHER DO YOU!!
bill is a stinking coward liar who plugged his one sided "news" since he sees it as his job n made $3.5 million or more to fund his life style by telling lies.
O'Reilly didn't know crap about Brad Manning and Julian Assange when he called them traitors. Anyone who believes the lying, irresponsible sack of shit can't distinguish facts from opinions or does not want to. He consistently omits and tries to evade crucial facts that refute his arguments. Ralph lends him credibility just by speaking to him. Ugh.
@asynkronos yeah, but the fox audience would rather accept lies from bill o'reilly than hear the truth in those leaks, that's the disturbing part about fox. it's easy to understand the concept of brainwashing when you see the impact is has on them.
In regards to civil liberties, military spending, and foreign policy, ralph nader is perfect. But his economic theories are just complete nonsense, thank god for Ron Paul.
@FlyingPinkUnicorn Really? I agree with you on the drunken Mick -- I actually find Nader to be a solid guy. I don't agree with him on 98% of the issues, but he is far from a phony.
Let us focus on RENEWABLE Energy and protect the precious Air, Water, and Soils for all of Earth. PEACE NOW and redirect our technology to Human Needs.
Holy sweet merciful FUCK!!! Kansas just deployed more soldiers to Afghanistan, and you know what their mission is? To promote agriculture and business in fucking Afghanistan!!! They want to spend our money and time teaching farmers to farm and people with no money to conduct business! What sheer BRILLIANCE!!!
@jneil2007 FUCK THAT SHIT. Even if we're going to have a mock congressional "Dream Team" Nader must come first. Then Kucinich as VP, then Ventura as SoS, and Paul for Secretary of Defense. Hah!
I can't believe that billo would argue that this fort hood massacre was a terrorist jihad attack against america.... Anyone with half a brain can understand this, this man joined the US army loyal to his country, he got bullied and persecuted for being a muslim arab and just like a bunch of high school teenagers have done after getting bullied, decided to take a stupid way out and grab a gun and go shoot up people. The man did not hate america otherwise he wouldnt be in the US army.
@ultimategoobah He's trying to portray Nader as unfit for leadership by imputing that Nader is downplaying the threat posed by Jihadists or what O'Reilly wants you to see as Jihadists.
The way O'Reilly nonchalantly says I was wrong about Iraq, he should be waterboarded so he gets a taste of his own medicine.
its fuckin funny how he said ' it could be done by terrorists or it could be done by criminals' ! huh ? , isnt a terrorist a person who inflicts terror on a group of people ??
@eedobee It's a band-wagon sort of thing. Everyone's ideology forces them to be an asshole to anyone who disagrees with their world-view. It's how they get a sense of false superiority.
Every idiot was falling over himself to say "he was a Muslim, therefore this massacre was terrorism" before learning any actual facts about the situation.
'Terrorism' means using the threat of violence as leverage in a negotiation toward an achievable objective e.g. the IRA seeking to separate from Britain. If a Muslim feels angry about the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan and goes psycho as a result, this is not necessarily terrorism. It could just be one Muslim's politically motivated rage.
@garethmdawson It would not work. Sure, they have plenty in common, and they would be great for completely shaking up the system, but they very likely will never run together for some obvious reason. Example: Nader wants single payer healthcare, Ron Paul does not. I will make a new account. Check out "GreenParty2012activist"
The reason bill i liely is trying to badger Mr Nader about the terrible massacre at Ft Hood is because???????? Mr Nader is from middle eastern decent !! olielys main source of income comes from demonizing people of different ethnicity . This low life chickenhawk coward ran away when Mr Nader dressed him down.
@razz187 I can't like this enough!!! Nader in 2008. Writing him down again for 2012. All the candidates have good ideas, however. I would love to see a debate amongst the three.
@alixoschmann Ron Paul 1st because he never bends the constitution, free health care sounds good but the government always ends up 2 corrupt to have them run something like that, Ralph Nader 2nd, Dennis Kucinich 3rd
When OReilly comes on, I switch to Fox BUSINESS News and watch Judge Andrew Napolitano on "Freedom Watch." I get the news of the day and learn about the Constitution! What a deal!
Robert kennedy , Jack Kennedy , Gandhi , Malcolm X , Lennon , Martin Luther King... and out of 320 million people there isn't one lunatic willing to shoot that piece of shit O'reilly...unbeleivable.
@007InDaSky Don't you DARE call him a neo-con. that's an extremely offensive insult for conservatives. I DEMAND that you apologize for that statement.
And the media and our Leader sold you on false hope and change. Wake up! open your eyes, and mind. History repeats itself. This country is run by a private bank. making(losing) money with made up value, on you. fighting wars on behalf of the very same, and very few MegaCorps that have been the real power fo 60 years. the same old money is still behind it all, also banking on idiots in mass to buy the whole package. Your just what is needed...Blind to Truth. Do some research fo yourself,
The Left needs a real liberal channel not CNN which is there to pacify us. This is BULLSHIT! We need a Leftist Fox News equivalent. This is outrageous!!
@AroundSun Right cause we really need just one Right-Wing party not two. You dumb dumb that's how totalitarian regimes start. At least we cared about America in '04. You guys were focused more on other countries. Man I'm glad I'm not a faggoty Right Wing douche.
@HoGraz You retarded liberals could not win an argument if your life depended on it. Ron Paul is a libertarian not a republican. We do not need parties at all, we need a smaller government
@AroundSun He ran under the Republican ticket so he could at least get to the debates, BRRRO. I guess that's why in the above video Ralph 'won the argument' with O'Reilley. P.S. Ralph Nader rated significantly more libertartian than Paul. He's a left wing Libertarian when you get down to it, however. I'll see you later loser.
@HoGraz Left wing libertarian? There is no such thing, you can not be a libertarian and be for MORE government control. Ralph Nader thinks government should run the auto industry.
@AroundSun That's because in Europe where they have more than two parties they actually have different types of libertarians. It's called libertarian socialist if you want to know what some libertarians are like Noam Chomksy. It's not all just about GUNS and being machismo. Ralph Nader thinks Abortion and Gun laws are something Democrats need to take serious instead of blowing off Republicans on it because he believes in the democratic process. Get it together dude.
@HoGraz Right but to me that is an oxymoron. Libertarian socialist??? You either use force or you do not. You either have free markets or you do not. You either use plunder or you do not. There is voluntary exchange, and then there is force and coercion. It really is a left right game no tops and bottoms and all this other bullshit I hear from the political spectrum. You either think the gov should control courts, police, defense and no more..Or you think it should have greater controls
@AroundSun I understand and I respect your opinion despite setting me off earlier, friend. Well a lot of the time it's whoever has the loudest voice and that's why most people in power are slightly more authoritarian than libertarian. Also that's probably why you never hear about this. It's never been in practice except the anarcho-syndacalism in Catalonia that Orwell fought for. Thing is having the government 'control' things can also prevent for anarcho corporate capitalism.
@AroundSun Sometimes things good have been done by government agencies like the FCC blocking the RIAA raising royalties for everyone across the board cause they can't stand the people having things like MP3's. The RIAA was working Clear Channel who had 70% of the market to destroy independent and college radio. It's all symantics however. You can say "Market" or you can say "Airwaves" or you can say "Power." So when you say "Let the free markets do their thing" you're undermining the working
@AroundSun poor who have no say and are allowed to suffer from the ebbs and bows of the system because across the board the concept of 'free markets' which is so widely misunderstood is more important than people fighting for better working conditions. See if we allowed the Big Business to control all the media they would inadvertantly control our lives. No one could get on the radio and overshout G. Beck or Savage in recruiting armies. Just remember this history is written by the winners.
@AroundSun Oh I forgot I was talking to a "Libertarian." What way for an ex-republican to feel cool. Everyone knows the body of politics is in on the left. See you later frat-daddy.
@HoGraz Liberals judge with intentions rather than results. Liberals think with their hearts and it often goes to their heads. Do I really have to have an economics class and make you look stupid? Do I really have to show you why you're wrong and why we're right? Both morally and practically. Do I have to teach world history and the constitution to you? You liberals are completely brain dead. You could not win an argument with me if your life depended on it. Politicians DONT CARE ABOUT YOU
@HoGraz You need understand cause and effect. When Allen Greenspan removed what little Regulation Wall Street had back in the 80's this led to all this shit we've had. Now we've gone back to kings in one sense or another-oligarchy if you will.I could explain it to you, but you're already too far gone.
@HoGraz "Allen Greenspan removed what little Regulation Wall Street had back in the 80's" --Are you high??? He's the unelected central banker who used the "Greenspan put" to intervene into the economy. Unelected, government mandated, central banks are the exact opposite of libertarian philosophy, while wholeheartedly embraced by Keynesian leftist.
@savemyplaylist He was economic advisor to Ford and did all that shit under Reagan. So you think we should move to an unregulated banking system again? Sure the Fed is screwy, but we'll be having all sorts of crises when the FDIC goes away. Look it up.That's why we got away from that, but you TV watching idiots who only respond to strength don't see why that's done us in. That's why we had AIG tank and the American people were bullied into pulling them out.
@HoGraz The FDIC is the worst of it all, they create huge more hazard. When people give more thought to purchasing a cell phone than finding the right bank to invest in, the FCID is surely to blame. Even if you believe in a central bank, the fact that it's privately owned and gets its funds directly from the Treasury untaxed is sickening. Such a scam.
@savemyplaylist Well I never said I liked the Federal Reserve. I know it's connected with Keysian spending, but that's what was used to get us out of inflation under Reagan. It's what was used to rebuild France after WWII. We're in DEBT so bad the whole country has nearly collapsed and will. However had Gore won and at least tried to do renewable energy we'd be in better financial times than we are today.South Korea has a 5% tax for renewable energy and they're not calling it a Job Killing idea.
@HoGraz Gore? You think Gore is any different than Bush??? You think Gore knows shit about "job creation?" My god, you are too far gone! If you want to know about Gore and job destruction just look into how he pushed for NAFTA and all the other bullshit MANAGED trade agreements. Ross Perot argued with that bastard in '92 and the dip shits made fun of him while buying Al's lies hook-line-and-sinker. It's quite saddening that you really think Gore is different than Bush, they're one in the same!
@savemyplaylist Oh I know man. He's a Blue Dog Democrat so they're almost Republicans. I know it's just a brand and a lot of what Clinton did was bad - Nafta for one. I agree with you on Ross Perot. I've seen that footage and yes Gore is a douche. Thing is though I still think not going into Iraq just backfire unless you were the IMF or Haliburton. Sure there's stuff with us to do with Petrol Dollars but I think it hurt us in the end.
@HoGraz I don't see what Iraq has to do with anything, but don't kid yourself Gore would have went in there just like Bush. Hell, Clinton and Gore were bombing the shit out of Iraq all through his time with Clinton in the white house. That was Osama's motivation for 9/11, the bombing raids that Clinton/Gore were doing to Iraq.
@savemyplaylist Right that's a good point. I remember that - Operation FoxFire. I still think not doing like other prosperous countries by trying to limit the demand for oil would be taking the high road.
@savemyplaylist It's investment. When you let the business class control us rather than the people particpating in the government this is what you get: a slow mindless destructive cycle where the People especially the ones not living in a cushy ignorant livelihood take on all the problems on their backs. We used the government against the people numerous times almost ALWAYS through Republican small government bull- The War on Terror, War on Drugs, TANF. It's always the opposite of what they say!
@savemyplaylist Do you even realize how the libertarians want to go to that free market bull? That's Republican nonsense in a sheep's clothing. You need to get that through your HEAD savemyplaylist or I'll back hand your Ron Paul dick sucking ass.
@savemyplaylist Do you even realize how the libertarians want to go to that free market bull? That's Republican nonsense in a sheep's clothing. You need to get that through your HEAD savemyplaylist or I'll back hand your Ron Paul dick sucking ass.
@HoGraz Face it, he's making money off of conspiracy-believing fanatics. You're like one of those people who turn on those infomercials in the middle of the night and believe it because they say they'll give you something for free, despite the fact that their claims (like Alex Jone's) are laughably preposterous. Typical scam tatctics. In the long run, Alex Jones is making money off his ability to capture the imaginations of gullible conspiracy-believing idiots.
There are 100 senators and 500 congress men , 600 men can figure out social and terror problems , shut the hell up Bill O'Reilly . A guy who picks up a gun and goes on a massacre isn't a terrorist or an insurgent that is just 21st century bs, its called a murderer.
I disagree with Nader on things, but i admire him for the same reason i admire Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel, Ross Perot: the fight against the establishment.
Of course O'Riley is completely outclassed by Citizen #1 Ralph Nader. But give BOR credit for putting Nader on and treating him better than the imitation leftist Randi Rhodes, who talked over, shouted down, and disrespected Nader. Nader in '12. Also, credit to ORiley for acknowledging his catastrophic blunder when he did the Huggy Bear war pimp swagger leading up to the illegal aggression against Iraq. Nader: not as pretty as Barak Obama, but way more critical and independent in his ideas.
Seriously, you people who say this "Nadar/Paul '12" crap are just down right retarded. Your only concern is electing candidates who are outsiders. You care almost nothing about ideals. The proof of this is simple. Nadar and Paul agree on almost nothing, so how in the HELL can you possibly put them together?
Nadar is a big-government lib, and Paul is a free-market, pro-life conservative. They are almost polar opposites. Ugh. Please learn the facts before you talk.
I gotta say Bill O'Reilly for once was decent. There wasn't much stupidity goin on and Ralph Nader actually had to hold his own, although clearly he did. I mean, these talkshows are weird, with tvs, and 3 second pauses between responses, but ralph nader can't be bullied, and it showed.
O'Reilly is for shallow thinkers that are concerned with the buck that they make and can only bow down to their masters/employers views and enforce those views to the shallow thinkers that are watching. I have noticed most of the posters here are awake and realize that we are in an information war. Blurring what is true, what is supposed to be true and what is presented as truth but later, proven as a lie. WikiLeaks is now at the center of that information war. The corporations are taking damage
Ralph Nadar is a true american hero..For years he has spoken truth to power.Bill O'reilly is an american crook he should be in jail with Bush and Cheney for the blood for oils war he helped them conduct. Lie lie lie O'reilly makes america look like a country of fools!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!O'Reilly is a high paid corporate propagandist and he does not speak for me!!!!! WAKE UP AMERICA!
I wish warren buffet would support nader or better yet, run himself and give america single payer insurance. most americans do not have an iq high enough to realize that republicans are not working for their best interests.
Ralph Nader is an amazing patriot! The media is becoming full of demagogues that shows little respect for people who have made amazing contributions to our country.
I am tired of watching people who have no manners or basic civility. I want to see people I can actually admire or hope my children can look up too. Would you want any of your children or students to become like Mr. OReilly? Why is he given this spot on national television. Its as if the news has become a circus.
@jimbobanalbeats o reilly was trying to make it sound like he is so knowledgeable of current events and put nader on the spot talking about fort hood when he wasnt there
I can't believe O'Reilly. I don't understand why people take him and other Fox News characters seriously. But they do, and in large numbers. Can anyone tell me why so many people are fooled by this propaganda. I saw through these guy after the first 5 minutes I ever watched their shows. How do people fall for this? Even intelligent people fall for this. Is it just older people who grew up trusting the media?
Jshect 2 weeks ago
@Jshect Years of childhood indoctrination, combined with isolation from opposing viewpoints? That's my guess.
metaserve 2 days ago
this is why they call him "billo the clown".
clockworkscott 2 weeks ago
"im not a clairvoyant like you." lol I love Ralph nader.
EmptyManifestation 3 weeks ago
Nader is one guy that you can't fuck with, he will not be bullshitted.
tanksbb 3 weeks ago 3
who's to say a muslim killing people is jihad, they dont call all christians that do mass murders crusades.
KiwiTomCrawford 1 month ago
@KiwiTomCrawford I know, Bill O'Reilly's sole obsession in life is to call all Muslims actions terrorist. If a Muslim robs a 7-11, it must be terrorism and no other reason.
TurboFuss1 4 weeks ago
I'm trying to get American leadership to step and tell the American people.....
what I want them to think instead of what the reality might be!
Franky4fingers78 1 month ago
Nader pwned O'Reilly so epically that I couldn't help laughing historically every time. LMFAO YEAH!!!!
davetista 1 month ago
The only one dodging is O'Reilly dodging getting his shit slapped by Nader's intelligence.
Nationstatesuser 1 month ago
You'll never see Nader on this show again. When Oreilly can't bully someone he does not have them on.
theenforcer1977 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
End War
Save Our Republic
RON PAUL 2012!!
Leftovervictim1991 1 month ago
@axs5530 Actually I think it was Snoop Dogg that said it right? But maybe Ludacris said it too. Either way though yes fuck bill oreilley!
lookingfortoday73 2 months ago
O'Reilley , what an arrogant twit . He might be one of the worst interviewers on the planet , or the best , as he seems to have guests just to pester them and use his Louder Than Thou bigot attitude . He's right perfect for The Fox Agenda , I guess .
mrstudes 2 months ago 14
Doesn't Fox discuss anything but "Islamo-fascism" and how Iran is the next Third Reich?
MattFoleyMotivation 2 months ago
But Nader doesn't actually know how the suspension works in a Corvair, and I can PROVE that.
What a MORON.
irritablearchitect 2 months ago
@irritablearchitect THANK YOU!
It's not completely relevant to the subject at hand, but I'm glad somebody said it. Nader isn't this genius that people make him out to be. He got famous for demonizing some decent pieces of machinery, but the part they never tell you is that his findings were later proven wrong.
TBustah 2 months ago
@TBustah It's obvious to anyone who has a good knowledge of automotive design and history that the VW Beetle (I think the Krauts called it the Type 01, officially), had the same basic, swing-arm design, BEFORE the Corvair was ever even conceived on the GM design boards.
It was never demonized in the way that Nadar did with the Corvair, and outsold the GM product by a huge margin, and had equally horrendous handling and performance.
Why, then?
GM had far DEEPER POCKETS.
End of story.
Thanks.
irritablearchitect 2 months ago
Nader was asked to come on the show to talk about one thing, and instead he plugs his book and insults his host's intelligence.
And you guys call O'REILLY the asshole? Who's wasting who's time?
TBustah 3 months ago
@TBustah oreilly is an asshole like you ,your a waste of life , i am a union thug and you have no intelligence
bonnevie9 3 months ago
@bonnevie9 I'm sorry, I'M an asshole?
You're the one using harsh words and trying to pick a fight, I'm just asking questions.
TBustah 3 months ago
@TBustah Some people can read between the lines and know what you are really trying to say .Yes you are an asshole
bonnevie9 3 months ago
@bonnevie9 All I'm "trying to say" is that people in the comments are saying O'Reilly wasted Nader's time, but Nader is the one who was invited on to talk about one thing, and then proceeded to change the subject, plug his merchandise, and belittle his host's intellect.
Just what about that makes me an asshole? I didn't say it in a rude way. Or is your definition of an asshole just anyone who disagrees with you?
TBustah 3 months ago
@bonnevie9 There's no need for that Union thug!
JdawgTheFirst 3 months ago
@TBustah Well actually, Nadar was asked to be on the show to discuss how to fundamentally change things in the country for the better. Not to talk about The Fort Hood Massacre, O'Reilly even says he is going to change the subject at the very beginning of the interview in a shameless attempt to try and grab more viewers. Next time, please use your head before you say something completetly ridiculous. Have a nice day, try and read a bit if you can. :) :)
cantarooots 3 months ago
@cantarooots Yes, he DID say that. I'm not arguing that he didn't say it. I'd have to be blind not to see that bright yellow book jacket at the beginning.
Perhaps I should have been more clear: instead of waiting until the last couple minutes of the show to talk about the book, like he was told he could do, he started talking about it almost right away so that he didn't have to answer the questions asked of him.
And he DID belittle O'Reilly's intelligence with that gum-chewing remark.
TBustah 2 months ago
@TBustah wow man, seriously? Did you do what O'Reilly did before this interview? Spend so much time thinkin of a way to belittle others and induce a reaction for the sake of attention from viewers and try to down size someones image or views? Bill O'Reilly is a TOOL! Did you even LISTEN to what he was saying? of course not cuz hey guys I forgot he only WATCHED the video. "I saw the yellow book so im not blind". "Only rich people can save us!" and "Only genius' like you know what they are saying"
Triumph8OVER8Tragedy 2 months ago
@Triumph8OVER8Tragedy You're putting words in my mouth.
I never said either of those last two things, nor am I the one throwing around harsh words. If anyone's out to belittle anyone or get attention, it's you.
TBustah 2 months ago
I dont think you understand. Nadar came on the show to discuss his book, not Fort Hood. Also, Bill O'Reilly doesnt have much interlligence to belittle, hes a moron. Agree to disagree, have a good day sir.
cantarooots 2 months ago
@cantarooots Don't talk down to me, I understand perfectly.
It doesn't matter what he WANTED to discuss, it's not what he was invited on to the show for. It was rude and a waste of time for him to just abruptly change the subject like that.
And even if you were right about O'Reilly being a moron, does that make it right for somebody to come onto his show and insult him like that? Would you walk into a classroom full of special ed kids and start shouting "retard"?
TBustah 2 months ago
@TBustah He was invited on the show to discuss his book, not Fort Hood. Why cant you understand this?
Bill did not stick to the agenda and started discussing issues that Nadar hadnt agreed to talk about. This is why Nadar is upset
No I wouldnt walk into a room of special needs students and yell retard, but if I did, Id still have more class than our boy bill. That is just a ridiculous argument, Bill is a fully functioning adult, with a new program that prides itself on its legitamacy.comeon
cantarooots 2 months ago
@TBustah ...Are you the producer of this show?? How do YOU know what he was invited on the show for?? The guy wrote a book and is obviously on a book promotion tour.... I would bet money that he was scheduled to promote his book. I'm not sure, but my guess is that he was scheduled even before the massacre. But it was the hot subject of the day, so Bill wanted to beat it into the ground. I don't know the answer, but unless you booked Nader for this interview... NEITHER DO YOU!!
FyodorMDostoyevsky 2 months ago
Nader should save his breath, and not even talk to idiots like O'Reilly.
This clip basically shows O'Reilly wasting a good man's time on the air, just to show what an asshole he is.....
I thought a good talk show host should let their guests do most of the talking....
Kold2market 3 months ago
Seriously! Somebody needs to take this fucking idiot out! The world would be a wayyy better place!
ZombieApocalyps 3 months ago
@ZombieApocalyps
They'd probably put Hannity and Bill's time slot and then give Hannity's time slot to some other corporate neo-con, nothing would really change.
MrKrautman 3 months ago
whats wrong with speculators?
csplendrig 3 months ago
bill is a stinking coward liar who plugged his one sided "news" since he sees it as his job n made $3.5 million or more to fund his life style by telling lies.
ifuknjk 3 months ago
@ifuknjk when o reilly did a book signing the public had to go through a metal detector because he sez things too inflamitory
spacepatrolman 3 months ago
O'Reilly didn't know crap about Brad Manning and Julian Assange when he called them traitors. Anyone who believes the lying, irresponsible sack of shit can't distinguish facts from opinions or does not want to. He consistently omits and tries to evade crucial facts that refute his arguments. Ralph lends him credibility just by speaking to him. Ugh.
asynkronos 4 months ago
@asynkronos yeah, but the fox audience would rather accept lies from bill o'reilly than hear the truth in those leaks, that's the disturbing part about fox. it's easy to understand the concept of brainwashing when you see the impact is has on them.
ThaigerDon 3 months ago
In regards to civil liberties, military spending, and foreign policy, ralph nader is perfect. But his economic theories are just complete nonsense, thank god for Ron Paul.
alixoschmann 4 months ago
O'Reilly is a bloviating windbag but Ralph Nader is just silly. There is no reason to take either of them seriously.
FlyingPinkUnicorn 4 months ago
@FlyingPinkUnicorn Really? I agree with you on the drunken Mick -- I actually find Nader to be a solid guy. I don't agree with him on 98% of the issues, but he is far from a phony.
BigStick3456 4 months ago
@FlyingPinkUnicorn i wouldnt say nader is silly with the amount of laws and books he wrote
spacepatrolman 3 months ago
Let us focus on RENEWABLE Energy and protect the precious Air, Water, and Soils for all of Earth. PEACE NOW and redirect our technology to Human Needs.
OnenessNow 4 months ago
Comment removed
unfortunatebeam 4 months ago
Ralph Nader has got to go down in history as one of the GREATEST MEN ON EARTH...`
```
I REMEMBER people praising him in the 60 & 70s as a true Altruistic public defender...and might I add that
```
SCUMM BAMMASS TAKKES IT IN THE AZZ & THEN
`1`` SUCKS THE FATTEST KOK ON EARTH
HoodwinkedbyanAngel 4 months ago
Check out the Green Party/Partido Verde in 2012!
We are growing big around the world and we are here to stay!
GreenPartyJustice 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul: President
Ralph Nader: Vice President
Andrew Napilitano: Secretary of State
Jesse Ventura: Secretary of Defense
There.
Yabuturtle 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Holy sweet merciful FUCK!!! Kansas just deployed more soldiers to Afghanistan, and you know what their mission is? To promote agriculture and business in fucking Afghanistan!!! They want to spend our money and time teaching farmers to farm and people with no money to conduct business! What sheer BRILLIANCE!!!
melbyRick 4 months ago
win for nader for stayin cool.
O'reilly is such a "short for richard"
slaviczech 4 months ago
@slaviczech next time OReilly does an interview it would be awesome if he'll have taken his brain too
slaviczech 4 months ago
Illegal war is an oxymoron
AmericanBadass44 4 months ago
If Americans knew what was good for them, Nader would have been President a long time ago.
Mujangga 5 months ago
Paul for president, Kucinich for VP, Ventura for sec. of state, Nader for whatever, just get these guys in an administration together.
jneil2007 5 months ago 20
@jneil2007 FUCK THAT SHIT. Even if we're going to have a mock congressional "Dream Team" Nader must come first. Then Kucinich as VP, then Ventura as SoS, and Paul for Secretary of Defense. Hah!
erik4727 1 month ago
@jneil2007 amen
bonkerrza 3 weeks ago
I can't believe that billo would argue that this fort hood massacre was a terrorist jihad attack against america.... Anyone with half a brain can understand this, this man joined the US army loyal to his country, he got bullied and persecuted for being a muslim arab and just like a bunch of high school teenagers have done after getting bullied, decided to take a stupid way out and grab a gun and go shoot up people. The man did not hate america otherwise he wouldnt be in the US army.
Warrantofficer13 5 months ago
Bill is #1 in cable news by a wide margin.
He is very smart, but dumbs it way down for ratings.
tnekkc 5 months ago
At least Bill seems intimidated by his intelligence.
eatcarpet 5 months ago
Vote Green Party 2012!
GreenPartyJustice 5 months ago
what does it matter if its a criminal act or a terrorist act? I don't really get it. What is bill oreilly getting at with that? Someone help me out.
ultimategoobah 5 months ago
@ultimategoobah He's trying to portray Nader as unfit for leadership by imputing that Nader is downplaying the threat posed by Jihadists or what O'Reilly wants you to see as Jihadists.
The way O'Reilly nonchalantly says I was wrong about Iraq, he should be waterboarded so he gets a taste of his own medicine.
TheMundusvultdecipi 5 months ago
its fuckin funny how he said ' it could be done by terrorists or it could be done by criminals' ! huh ? , isnt a terrorist a person who inflicts terror on a group of people ??
abpunk11 6 months ago
O'Reilly is paid by Fox to present a right wing authoritative point on an issue. He does that very well. He is very good at his job.
He is not paid by Fox to be an impartial interviewer. He is not a journalist. He would not be very good at this job.
Why are people do worked up at him?
eedobee 6 months ago
@eedobee It's a band-wagon sort of thing. Everyone's ideology forces them to be an asshole to anyone who disagrees with their world-view. It's how they get a sense of false superiority.
Amadeus5150 6 months ago
Bill O'Reilly completely owns that politically correct spineless piece of shit!
Bolyriak 6 months ago
@Bolyriak retarded redneck stop commenting on youtube videos go back to fuck your goats idiot
catalinaguerrero 6 months ago
@Bolyriak Bill O'Reilly is a complete idiot who obviously doesn't know the first thing about politics, and neither do you.
OsxinBraveheart 6 months ago
If the American people ever decide to hang their politicians, someone has to make sure Bill gets it too.
rustyrusky 6 months ago
this guy o'reilly has an awful lot of hate in him...you don't even have to listen to the words,you can see it in his face...
tkshots 7 months ago 11
How many victims of American bombings in Afghanistan and Iraq has Fox News broadcasted?
bapyou 7 months ago in playlist RALPH NADER
Every idiot was falling over himself to say "he was a Muslim, therefore this massacre was terrorism" before learning any actual facts about the situation.
'Terrorism' means using the threat of violence as leverage in a negotiation toward an achievable objective e.g. the IRA seeking to separate from Britain. If a Muslim feels angry about the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan and goes psycho as a result, this is not necessarily terrorism. It could just be one Muslim's politically motivated rage.
FrogmortonHotchkiss 8 months ago 8
just call it the ralph nader show lol. pwnd
isreal423 8 months ago
Terrorist is just a fucking word.
iatemytaxreturn 8 months ago
There's talk about a Green Party run in 2012 between Jesse Ventura and Bernie Sanders!
GreenParty2012 8 months ago
@GreenParty2012 how about Ralph Nader + Ron Paul
garethmdawson 8 months ago
@garethmdawson It would not work. Sure, they have plenty in common, and they would be great for completely shaking up the system, but they very likely will never run together for some obvious reason. Example: Nader wants single payer healthcare, Ron Paul does not. I will make a new account. Check out "GreenParty2012activist"
GreenParty2012 8 months ago
Ralph Nader can not be President of the United States! Because clearly he was born in Canada!
pistol987 8 months ago
I might just vote for him
RaVeRNaTiOn 9 months ago
2:23
WiseUncleSam 9 months ago
3:41 bill admits ralph nader is right
gonzo361 9 months ago
Bill O'Reilly is such an asshole
TheLizardKingC 9 months ago 71
@TheLizardKingC Bill O'Reilly is 100 times worse than an asshole. He's a stupid asshole.
tpstrat14 6 months ago
@TheLizardKingC Okay how is he an asshole in this specific clip? Nader is the one insulting his capabilities...
Ayyadification 6 months ago
@TheLizardKingC Actually I think Ralph scared Bill. That's rare but hey it's good television.
RealTime88 6 months ago
@TheLizardKingC Bill O'Reilly is not an asshole, no. HE'S A MOTHERFUCKING MORON.
darkillity 5 months ago
@TheLizardKingC Bill O'Reilly is an UBERasshole.
th3giv3r 3 months ago
@TheLizardKingC IN THE FAMOUS WORDS OF LUDACRIS, "FUCK BILL O'REILLY!"
axs5530 3 months ago
you DAAAAADGE IT!!!!
ol' retarded billo
joe80dmanizanerd 9 months ago
The reason bill i liely is trying to badger Mr Nader about the terrible massacre at Ft Hood is because???????? Mr Nader is from middle eastern decent !! olielys main source of income comes from demonizing people of different ethnicity . This low life chickenhawk coward ran away when Mr Nader dressed him down.
jiwdan416 9 months ago
RALPH NADER!!!
SoberAllmanBrosFan 9 months ago
Ron Paul (Republican), Dennis Kucinich (Democrat), Ralph Nader (Independent)
THAT'S WHAT I WANNA SEE ON THE BALLOTS IN 2012
razz187 9 months ago 99
seems like a win-win-win to me.
seandunx 7 months ago
@razz187 I think They is a pretty cool guy. tehy kills mainstrams and doesnt afraid of anything.
eedobee 6 months ago
@razz187 I can't like this enough!!! Nader in 2008. Writing him down again for 2012. All the candidates have good ideas, however. I would love to see a debate amongst the three.
immehgen 6 months ago
@razz187 Does Bill O'Reilly really think that every Muslim criminal is a terrorist? IDIOT.
CuriousGeorgeMonkey9 6 months ago
@razz187 I'm an independent and would love to see that.
RealTime88 6 months ago
@razz187 That's a hard one... NADER FTW!!!
caucasianjake 4 months ago
@razz187 Who would you vote for out of those 3, just out of curiousity?
alixoschmann 4 months ago
@alixoschmann Ron Paul 1st because he never bends the constitution, free health care sounds good but the government always ends up 2 corrupt to have them run something like that, Ralph Nader 2nd, Dennis Kucinich 3rd
razz187 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When OReilly comes on, I switch to Fox BUSINESS News and watch Judge Andrew Napolitano on "Freedom Watch." I get the news of the day and learn about the Constitution! What a deal!
vechorik 3 months ago
@razz187 Ron Paul as President ....Dennis Kucinich as Vice president ....Ralph Nader as Secretary of State
TheJasonDR 3 months ago
O'Reilly got effed in the A!
BPKesq 9 months ago 3
Keep in mind that O'reily is smarter than he acts. He does most of this purely for the ratings, because that is how he makes money.
Axeaddonis 9 months ago
hahaha. Poor Ralph. He's still butt hurt that he'll never be elected President.
pantherfanatic7 10 months ago
the world needs people like Nader.
ok1239 10 months ago
Ralph Nader and Rue Paul in 2012...
mikepiazza 10 months ago 3
Robert kennedy , Jack Kennedy , Gandhi , Malcolm X , Lennon , Martin Luther King... and out of 320 million people there isn't one lunatic willing to shoot that piece of shit O'reilly...unbeleivable.
luc649 10 months ago 2
bill o'reilly got FUCKING PWNED!
this Ralph Nader should be president.
CyrusTheElder 10 months ago 2
Ralph nader just owned that fucking neocon clown
007InDaSky 10 months ago 4
@007InDaSky Don't you DARE call him a neo-con. that's an extremely offensive insult for conservatives. I DEMAND that you apologize for that statement.
ladistar 10 months ago
@ladistar hehe my bad sorry
007InDaSky 10 months ago
It's such a shame Nader will probably never be elected president - a damn shame.
JazzyJonas 10 months ago
RALPH NADER FOR PRESIDENT 2012.
This time we MEAN IT!
raproducer 10 months ago
And the media and our Leader sold you on false hope and change. Wake up! open your eyes, and mind. History repeats itself. This country is run by a private bank. making(losing) money with made up value, on you. fighting wars on behalf of the very same, and very few MegaCorps that have been the real power fo 60 years. the same old money is still behind it all, also banking on idiots in mass to buy the whole package. Your just what is needed...Blind to Truth. Do some research fo yourself,
TheOrphanite 11 months ago
Comment removed
Abon666 11 months ago
The problem with Ralph Nader is that he talks about real issues that impact people. We don't like that. We elect people who make us feel good.
Spengler56 11 months ago 4
The Left needs a real liberal channel not CNN which is there to pacify us. This is BULLSHIT! We need a Leftist Fox News equivalent. This is outrageous!!
HoGraz 1 year ago
@HoGraz No leftists need a bullet to the dome, that's about it
AroundSun 1 year ago
@AroundSun Right cause we really need just one Right-Wing party not two. You dumb dumb that's how totalitarian regimes start. At least we cared about America in '04. You guys were focused more on other countries. Man I'm glad I'm not a faggoty Right Wing douche.
HoGraz 1 year ago
@HoGraz You retarded liberals could not win an argument if your life depended on it. Ron Paul is a libertarian not a republican. We do not need parties at all, we need a smaller government
AroundSun 1 year ago
@AroundSun He ran under the Republican ticket so he could at least get to the debates, BRRRO. I guess that's why in the above video Ralph 'won the argument' with O'Reilley. P.S. Ralph Nader rated significantly more libertartian than Paul. He's a left wing Libertarian when you get down to it, however. I'll see you later loser.
HoGraz 1 year ago
@HoGraz Left wing libertarian? There is no such thing, you can not be a libertarian and be for MORE government control. Ralph Nader thinks government should run the auto industry.
AroundSun 1 year ago
@AroundSun That's because in Europe where they have more than two parties they actually have different types of libertarians. It's called libertarian socialist if you want to know what some libertarians are like Noam Chomksy. It's not all just about GUNS and being machismo. Ralph Nader thinks Abortion and Gun laws are something Democrats need to take serious instead of blowing off Republicans on it because he believes in the democratic process. Get it together dude.
HoGraz 1 year ago
@HoGraz Faggot-ass Republican. Prooved nothing.
HoGraz 1 year ago
@HoGraz Right but to me that is an oxymoron. Libertarian socialist??? You either use force or you do not. You either have free markets or you do not. You either use plunder or you do not. There is voluntary exchange, and then there is force and coercion. It really is a left right game no tops and bottoms and all this other bullshit I hear from the political spectrum. You either think the gov should control courts, police, defense and no more..Or you think it should have greater controls
AroundSun 11 months ago
@AroundSun I understand and I respect your opinion despite setting me off earlier, friend. Well a lot of the time it's whoever has the loudest voice and that's why most people in power are slightly more authoritarian than libertarian. Also that's probably why you never hear about this. It's never been in practice except the anarcho-syndacalism in Catalonia that Orwell fought for. Thing is having the government 'control' things can also prevent for anarcho corporate capitalism.
HoGraz 11 months ago
@AroundSun Sometimes things good have been done by government agencies like the FCC blocking the RIAA raising royalties for everyone across the board cause they can't stand the people having things like MP3's. The RIAA was working Clear Channel who had 70% of the market to destroy independent and college radio. It's all symantics however. You can say "Market" or you can say "Airwaves" or you can say "Power." So when you say "Let the free markets do their thing" you're undermining the working
HoGraz 11 months ago
@AroundSun poor who have no say and are allowed to suffer from the ebbs and bows of the system because across the board the concept of 'free markets' which is so widely misunderstood is more important than people fighting for better working conditions. See if we allowed the Big Business to control all the media they would inadvertantly control our lives. No one could get on the radio and overshout G. Beck or Savage in recruiting armies. Just remember this history is written by the winners.
HoGraz 11 months ago
@HoGraz hahaha you crack me up...keep going
AroundSun 11 months ago
@AroundSun Oh I forgot I was talking to a "Libertarian." What way for an ex-republican to feel cool. Everyone knows the body of politics is in on the left. See you later frat-daddy.
HoGraz 11 months ago
@HoGraz Liberals judge with intentions rather than results. Liberals think with their hearts and it often goes to their heads. Do I really have to have an economics class and make you look stupid? Do I really have to show you why you're wrong and why we're right? Both morally and practically. Do I have to teach world history and the constitution to you? You liberals are completely brain dead. You could not win an argument with me if your life depended on it. Politicians DONT CARE ABOUT YOU
AroundSun 11 months ago
@AroundSun You're a lost sheep.
HoGraz 11 months ago
@HoGraz You need understand cause and effect. When Allen Greenspan removed what little Regulation Wall Street had back in the 80's this led to all this shit we've had. Now we've gone back to kings in one sense or another-oligarchy if you will.I could explain it to you, but you're already too far gone.
HoGraz 11 months ago
@HoGraz "Allen Greenspan removed what little Regulation Wall Street had back in the 80's" --Are you high??? He's the unelected central banker who used the "Greenspan put" to intervene into the economy. Unelected, government mandated, central banks are the exact opposite of libertarian philosophy, while wholeheartedly embraced by Keynesian leftist.
savemyplaylist 11 months ago
@savemyplaylist He was economic advisor to Ford and did all that shit under Reagan. So you think we should move to an unregulated banking system again? Sure the Fed is screwy, but we'll be having all sorts of crises when the FDIC goes away. Look it up.That's why we got away from that, but you TV watching idiots who only respond to strength don't see why that's done us in. That's why we had AIG tank and the American people were bullied into pulling them out.
HoGraz 11 months ago
@HoGraz The FDIC is the worst of it all, they create huge more hazard. When people give more thought to purchasing a cell phone than finding the right bank to invest in, the FCID is surely to blame. Even if you believe in a central bank, the fact that it's privately owned and gets its funds directly from the Treasury untaxed is sickening. Such a scam.
savemyplaylist 11 months ago
@savemyplaylist Well I never said I liked the Federal Reserve. I know it's connected with Keysian spending, but that's what was used to get us out of inflation under Reagan. It's what was used to rebuild France after WWII. We're in DEBT so bad the whole country has nearly collapsed and will. However had Gore won and at least tried to do renewable energy we'd be in better financial times than we are today.South Korea has a 5% tax for renewable energy and they're not calling it a Job Killing idea.
HoGraz 11 months ago
@HoGraz Gore? You think Gore is any different than Bush??? You think Gore knows shit about "job creation?" My god, you are too far gone! If you want to know about Gore and job destruction just look into how he pushed for NAFTA and all the other bullshit MANAGED trade agreements. Ross Perot argued with that bastard in '92 and the dip shits made fun of him while buying Al's lies hook-line-and-sinker. It's quite saddening that you really think Gore is different than Bush, they're one in the same!
savemyplaylist 11 months ago
@savemyplaylist Oh I know man. He's a Blue Dog Democrat so they're almost Republicans. I know it's just a brand and a lot of what Clinton did was bad - Nafta for one. I agree with you on Ross Perot. I've seen that footage and yes Gore is a douche. Thing is though I still think not going into Iraq just backfire unless you were the IMF or Haliburton. Sure there's stuff with us to do with Petrol Dollars but I think it hurt us in the end.
HoGraz 11 months ago
@HoGraz I don't see what Iraq has to do with anything, but don't kid yourself Gore would have went in there just like Bush. Hell, Clinton and Gore were bombing the shit out of Iraq all through his time with Clinton in the white house. That was Osama's motivation for 9/11, the bombing raids that Clinton/Gore were doing to Iraq.
savemyplaylist 11 months ago
@savemyplaylist Right that's a good point. I remember that - Operation FoxFire. I still think not doing like other prosperous countries by trying to limit the demand for oil would be taking the high road.
HoGraz 11 months ago
@savemyplaylist It's investment. When you let the business class control us rather than the people particpating in the government this is what you get: a slow mindless destructive cycle where the People especially the ones not living in a cushy ignorant livelihood take on all the problems on their backs. We used the government against the people numerous times almost ALWAYS through Republican small government bull- The War on Terror, War on Drugs, TANF. It's always the opposite of what they say!
HoGraz 11 months ago
@savemyplaylist Do you even realize how the libertarians want to go to that free market bull? That's Republican nonsense in a sheep's clothing. You need to get that through your HEAD savemyplaylist or I'll back hand your Ron Paul dick sucking ass.
HoGraz 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@savemyplaylist Do you even realize how the libertarians want to go to that free market bull? That's Republican nonsense in a sheep's clothing. You need to get that through your HEAD savemyplaylist or I'll back hand your Ron Paul dick sucking ass.
HoGraz 11 months ago
@HoGraz Face it, he's making money off of conspiracy-believing fanatics. You're like one of those people who turn on those infomercials in the middle of the night and believe it because they say they'll give you something for free, despite the fact that their claims (like Alex Jone's) are laughably preposterous. Typical scam tatctics. In the long run, Alex Jones is making money off his ability to capture the imaginations of gullible conspiracy-believing idiots.
AroundSun 11 months ago
@AroundSun Haha. OK.
HoGraz 11 months ago
O'Reilly needs to chill with the shoving words in peoples mouths.
dkrakovski 1 year ago
how was this not terrorism???
xardas611 1 year ago
There are 100 senators and 500 congress men , 600 men can figure out social and terror problems , shut the hell up Bill O'Reilly . A guy who picks up a gun and goes on a massacre isn't a terrorist or an insurgent that is just 21st century bs, its called a murderer.
Ryusan11 1 year ago
2012 vote NADER
pandasftuw 1 year ago
Bill O'Reilly is such a dumb motherfucker.
z0mgz0rs 1 year ago
I disagree with Nader on things, but i admire him for the same reason i admire Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel, Ross Perot: the fight against the establishment.
chaset51 1 year ago
Of course O'Riley is completely outclassed by Citizen #1 Ralph Nader. But give BOR credit for putting Nader on and treating him better than the imitation leftist Randi Rhodes, who talked over, shouted down, and disrespected Nader. Nader in '12. Also, credit to ORiley for acknowledging his catastrophic blunder when he did the Huggy Bear war pimp swagger leading up to the illegal aggression against Iraq. Nader: not as pretty as Barak Obama, but way more critical and independent in his ideas.
drjimiboy69 1 year ago
FUCK SALT!!!! OH and anyone who has a show on corporate tv news
ItOffishul 1 year ago
Ralph Nader took down Oreilly like a rabid pit bull, chewed him up and spit him out.
DF1234567 1 year ago 2
Seriously, you people who say this "Nadar/Paul '12" crap are just down right retarded. Your only concern is electing candidates who are outsiders. You care almost nothing about ideals. The proof of this is simple. Nadar and Paul agree on almost nothing, so how in the HELL can you possibly put them together?
Nadar is a big-government lib, and Paul is a free-market, pro-life conservative. They are almost polar opposites. Ugh. Please learn the facts before you talk.
ebeatworld 1 year ago
@ebeatworld stfu, if your small mind cant find a solution, it doesnt mean one does not exist. dick.
streetrider180 1 year ago
@streetrider180 I'm trying to understand how your comment has anything to do with what I said. A solution for what?
ebeatworld 1 year ago
Always unbelievable how stupid people must be to watch this dirty propaganda channel FOX NEWS !
Better watch a porn... there is more " useful information"...
HousekaterClaudio 1 year ago
I gotta say Bill O'Reilly for once was decent. There wasn't much stupidity goin on and Ralph Nader actually had to hold his own, although clearly he did. I mean, these talkshows are weird, with tvs, and 3 second pauses between responses, but ralph nader can't be bullied, and it showed.
CoffeeShaman2012 1 year ago
O'Reilly is for shallow thinkers that are concerned with the buck that they make and can only bow down to their masters/employers views and enforce those views to the shallow thinkers that are watching. I have noticed most of the posters here are awake and realize that we are in an information war. Blurring what is true, what is supposed to be true and what is presented as truth but later, proven as a lie. WikiLeaks is now at the center of that information war. The corporations are taking damage
ghostcar 1 year ago
what a champ
cdphatty 1 year ago
i wish bill was like this more.
halflifeproductionz 1 year ago
Ralph Nadar is a true american hero..For years he has spoken truth to power.Bill O'reilly is an american crook he should be in jail with Bush and Cheney for the blood for oils war he helped them conduct. Lie lie lie O'reilly makes america look like a country of fools!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!O'Reilly is a high paid corporate propagandist and he does not speak for me!!!!! WAKE UP AMERICA!
sawthesunatnight 1 year ago
Vote Ralph Nader, Cynthia McKinney, Ingrid Newkirk, Stacy Herbert, & Max Keiser!
Write them in for every office every year!
deskset24 1 year ago
I wish warren buffet would support nader or better yet, run himself and give america single payer insurance. most americans do not have an iq high enough to realize that republicans are not working for their best interests.
bgshort99 1 year ago 2
lol, "all these other social problems". Apparently people starving and dying of disease is just a mere "social problem"
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
haha Bill O'Reilly is a cretinous twat. Ralph Nader is absolutely great.
OnTheRoof1 1 year ago 32
@OnTheRoof1 vote for him
shwwnn 9 months ago
can someone kill oreilly plz? i'll ow u one. nader is the balls.
programmertom2 1 year ago
Ralph Nader is an amazing patriot! The media is becoming full of demagogues that shows little respect for people who have made amazing contributions to our country.
I am tired of watching people who have no manners or basic civility. I want to see people I can actually admire or hope my children can look up too. Would you want any of your children or students to become like Mr. OReilly? Why is he given this spot on national television. Its as if the news has become a circus.
pakarpis 1 year ago
Oreilly is such a douche.
jimbobanalbeats 1 year ago 3
@jimbobanalbeats o reilly was trying to make it sound like he is so knowledgeable of current events and put nader on the spot talking about fort hood when he wasnt there