you are wrong, I have some 20 hours of video including most shown in Court, all are dull with no shadows. What video are you going by, describe the content as I have all videos except for one.
did i miss this post, sorry. Yes the gunman wore a greenish jacket, we all know that! This is not Bryant or the gunman in the video, the shooting has only commenced, the gunman will be shoooting for some time yet before he leaves via the FRONT steps. I know the facts but you have no idea.
I don't think so. That they foistered utterly useless legistlation and in effect stole firearms from law abiding citizens cannot be denied, though. This wasn't a coverup (no Australian Government would have the balls OR brains to arrange something on this scale), the disarming was a desperate anti-gun grab pushed on by the media and an ignorant, terrified public.
From what I can tell, most of the victim's were shot at ranges close enough to leave powder burns. At such ranges, my 90 year Grand Mother wouldn't have had any trouble killing someone.
No i was not. Thats why I used FOI to obtain the DPP Brief etc. And why I interviewed people who were there. And communicated with Police who attended on the day. And gathered enough info to fill a suitcase....books, statements, photos, newspaper articles, magazines, videos, interviews etc
I know that Bryant is innocent. This video is more about an organisation that KNEW it was going to take place so they arranged to have it recorded on Video!
I give up Steve, who took it matters not, nor does the content really. I guess you have not been paying attention. Or you have a closed mind, either way I have lost interest ok
never said they were special ops did i? The editors who put it to air obviously never thought it may be recorded and analysed for what it really is. Much footage has been doctored and respliced for effect. Trouble is when you tell lies you get found out. You see Steve the people that took the footage never knew part of it may go to air. A lousy 10 seconds has let the cat out of the bag.
what is your point? so they are 300M away, in the ruins i agree, there is no more video available.
Tell me why you dont think it sus to be there waiting for it to happen? Dont you think a sudden movement on any tripod 300M away will shake??? You ask Channel 9 then about it, cos it was only shown on Current Affair.
i am not saying its on a solid heavy tripod, but this team is hundreds of metres away in the ruins. You are missing the point of having two people WAITING with a camera! You dont think they were just lucky? ANd this footage was not entered as evidence for the hearing, yet its far more important than some footage that was supplied.
you are not making sense, now you mean the footage posted here??!!!!!!!! do you think i would sully my name with false footage????????
Noelozzy 3 years ago
ok just so everyone knows this footage is fake!!
wanna know why? the sky is over cast!
the massacre happened on a perfect clear day!!
mysty0 3 years ago
you are wrong, I have some 20 hours of video including most shown in Court, all are dull with no shadows. What video are you going by, describe the content as I have all videos except for one.
Noelozzy 3 years ago
Do you have any videos you could send me or give me a link to that show martin braynt like in court or interviewing him??
kellyannqt 3 years ago
there are over 60 videos on my CD. In court you are not allowed to video etc. I have the interview transcript on the CD
Noelozzy 3 years ago
so you cannot show us the footage? i would really like to see it
Mustacio 3 years ago
I just told kelly why you cannot see any...sheesh
have you ever seen photos or videos from Court before, don't be so dumb
Noelozzy 3 years ago
did i miss this post, sorry. Yes the gunman wore a greenish jacket, we all know that! This is not Bryant or the gunman in the video, the shooting has only commenced, the gunman will be shoooting for some time yet before he leaves via the FRONT steps. I know the facts but you have no idea.
Noelozzy 3 years ago
The port arthur massacre was a complete set up by the goverment to disarm australia. Bryant is innocent.
lmath13 3 years ago
I don't think so. That they foistered utterly useless legistlation and in effect stole firearms from law abiding citizens cannot be denied, though. This wasn't a coverup (no Australian Government would have the balls OR brains to arrange something on this scale), the disarming was a desperate anti-gun grab pushed on by the media and an ignorant, terrified public.
saintkartano 3 years ago
you have done no research on the topic. And no one said it was Government, I say factions within Gov. Read a book on the topic first next time .
Noelozzy 3 years ago
I have no idea except that the actual shooter was extremely skilled and trained.
There are clues given at Seascape to the identity.....but I try to stick to the facts and not speculations
Noelozzy 4 years ago
From what I can tell, most of the victim's were shot at ranges close enough to leave powder burns. At such ranges, my 90 year Grand Mother wouldn't have had any trouble killing someone.
saintkartano 3 years ago 2
well maybe your Gran should join the SAS or similar LOL
12 in first 15 seconds, is she that quick
Noelozzy 3 years ago
No i was not. Thats why I used FOI to obtain the DPP Brief etc. And why I interviewed people who were there. And communicated with Police who attended on the day. And gathered enough info to fill a suitcase....books, statements, photos, newspaper articles, magazines, videos, interviews etc
Noelozzy 4 years ago
OR the answer you are incapable of considering: There was more htan one shooter. Two Mossad agents. Briant is innocent.
Focoist911 4 years ago
I know that Bryant is innocent. This video is more about an organisation that KNEW it was going to take place so they arranged to have it recorded on Video!
Noelozzy 4 years ago
I dont have the answers ok, only telling you things are very wrong.
THe people that filmed the action would not be the Producers that aired what they aired OK.
How would the photo team know what it would be used for???
THe Producer obviously never realised it would be recorded and analysed did they?
I guess you think that some visitors to the site just pointed a camera witk a huge telelens at just the right moment.
Noelozzy 4 years ago
I give up Steve, who took it matters not, nor does the content really. I guess you have not been paying attention. Or you have a closed mind, either way I have lost interest ok
Noelozzy 4 years ago
never said they were special ops did i? The editors who put it to air obviously never thought it may be recorded and analysed for what it really is. Much footage has been doctored and respliced for effect. Trouble is when you tell lies you get found out. You see Steve the people that took the footage never knew part of it may go to air. A lousy 10 seconds has let the cat out of the bag.
Noelozzy 4 years ago
Steve Steve think what you are saying.... do you expect them to FULLY admit they were there waiting.
They put to air enough to serve their purpose only! THey assume that no one will realise what is going on with a part clip shown once only!!!!
Noelozzy 4 years ago
what is your point? so they are 300M away, in the ruins i agree, there is no more video available.
Tell me why you dont think it sus to be there waiting for it to happen? Dont you think a sudden movement on any tripod 300M away will shake??? You ask Channel 9 then about it, cos it was only shown on Current Affair.
Noelozzy 4 years ago
i am not saying its on a solid heavy tripod, but this team is hundreds of metres away in the ruins. You are missing the point of having two people WAITING with a camera! You dont think they were just lucky? ANd this footage was not entered as evidence for the hearing, yet its far more important than some footage that was supplied.
Noelozzy 4 years ago