Martin Brodeur Absolutley Robs Hartnell - Or did he? 2/10/2010

[DemolitionLovers905]

Thats deffinatly a goal (this coming from a devils fan).

[likecheese97]

thats a goal!!

[Jbayfan1]

Very true Flyers12From21 but that was pretty close

[canuckz]

"OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"

[ChilidrewAIDS]

There was no video proof u have to see the puck no goal good call

[shannonstamey]

The Flyers are having a really shit time with this sort of thing this season. Today, Gagne's goal was disallowed because Fleury got brushed while he was two feet out of his crease... Nonetheless, I will cheer Philadelphia on forever.. By the way, if you touch Crosby, chances are, you'll get a roughing penalty...

[DiMezza3]

wow that was a goal but Flyers won in OT anyway :)

[TheIReFLeX]

maybe was a goal but the rule is, the video review has to have enough evidence to overturn the original ice call. so no goal

[brutallyunbiased]

It was likely a goal...but with no video proof, you go with the initial call at ice level by the ref.

[magnum66]

Has to FULLY cross the line, white between the puck and the line. But no the puck was CROSSING the line and Brodeur had his glove over it so no conclusive evidence to even overthrow the decision even if it WAS a goal.

So no goal

[thegizz42]

lets be honest. it was a goal. flyers never get a break on reviewed goals.

[Flyers12FROM21]

If the Penguins shot that puck, it'd be goal. Just sayin'.

[kewlnsimpguy]

@thegizz42 lol yes the league is biased no you freaking idiot its not a goal because most of his glove isnt in the net

[thelegace34]

that puck did not go in. the puck has to be completely over the goal line and from the overhead shot, it seems as though the puck is still barely touching the line while in his glove

[Cias13]

goal for sure, still a nice save though haha.

[zeromont]

SHANNANIGANS on that save right there. totally went in. no worries, beat them anyway :-)

[TheHockeyfan9]

2010 year of the incredible saves