Added: 2 years ago
From: FFreeThinker
Views: 35,743
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (373)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • if you are retarded, listen to the evolutionists, if you are intelligent, listen to the Creationists, every intelligent person knows there is a God, but it isnt enough, God has come as a man to pay for our sins, and HE was prophecied to come for that purpose, and HE has been prophecied to come again, but this time to judge the

    world as the King of Kings. Jesus is HIS name. the bible, the book of truth. Let's be ready.

  • Propaganda like Coca-cola, just idiots believe in that, Intelligence is the answer. God, the Designer. Idiots, understand the basic of knowledge: Time, space, mass have had an absolute beginning. Evolution = Zombie "science".

  • @xchris1800 Did you... I don't want to insult you, but... Well, you graduated high-school, right?

  • 1:53 well hello, sexy Richard <3<3<3!!!!!!!!!

  • he finally admited dna prooves intelligent design

  • Why do I have the sudden desire to adopt him as my grandpa? xD

  • I have lost six (6) messages on two (2) atheist websites in the last 10 minutes.

    So much for free thinking.  It's allowed as long as it's from the atheist way of thinking!!! lol

  • i understand evolution/common ancesters etc etc but how can you get life from a rock? and there was nothing in the begining literally nothing not even the blackness of space itself. and then bang???? i could almost laugh because that seems so stupid. can someone define nothing for me please?

  • @british123able Out of the trillions of random chemicals in the early ocean soup, when just one is able to replicate itself it then duplicates billions of times and somewhere one of those billions does it slightly differently. It is evolving. This continues limpingly slowly for maybe half a billion years til systems that we call cells had developed. Development of life didn't happen suddenly "from a rock". It took billions of years.

    Something from nothing is silly. That's the god idea.

  • @british123able By the way, I kinda agree with you about the big bang. It seems much more feasible that the universe always existed, constantly changing, but it seems stupid to think the universe was created at some time out of nothing. As I said earlier, that is the sort of silliness you find in religion. It really should have no place in science.

  • Don't think anyone can say professor Dawkins is wrong when it comes to genes and evolution????

  • @markod2002 Good observation, Thank you!

  • @markod2002 Don't challenge a creationist, you can probably get them to deny god too if you try hard enough!

  • @s5b678 I've tried.

  • @Demonyk1 Go to you tube and watch these videos:

    1. "The Real Jesus: Myth #2 (4 of 10)" 2. "Proving the Bible Through Archaeology" 3. "The New Evidence That Demands A Verdict - Part One "

  • 24 people think that Genes are Gremlins

    =^_^=

  • Does anybody know the music the video starts off with? grtz

  • If this guy do not believe that there is a God who created the universe and all in it, then he is a fool, it doesnt matter how many Phd he got, The true is seen by everybody who wants to perceive, it's not hidden from anybody, just from those who decided to reject it.

  • @xchris1800

    WRONG. The truth can only be discovered when it's actually there. Fosils are truth, we know they exist. We can't say god exists because there's no physical evidence. By that same logic we can't say he doesn't exist. The bible is not proof no matter how much you want it to be since it was written in an eyewitness perspective, and eyewitness testimony is the weakest form of evidence there is.

  • @NUTCASE71733 Following your logic, I cannot believe in what you said, just because at best, you are just an eyewitness of what you say, I'm sorry. I cannot say you are wrong or right. Fosils are true, of course, and manuscrispts,and arquelogic evidences are true also, how do you interprete the fossils and I do is different, the same happens with the bible evidences. If the bible didnt have phisical evidence, it would be a fable. Jesus is GOD, is it not a great evidence of God?

  • @xchris1800

    they bible is just a story written by MEN. they is no god.

  • @assym2006 Of course the bible was written by men, but inspired by God, that is the diference.

  • its interesting to know without death we could not evolve. We must die, if we make ourselves immortal our evolution stops (or maybe we can drive the evolution in live bodies someday?)

  • Seriously, you're an ignorant person. Nobody with knowledge on the subject of evolution EVER said it was "random". "god is real because the bible says so. See, that's the proof! Bible talks of prophecy so it must have really happened. Proof!" What a religitard...

  • Well then, now that you concede that your entropy argument is devoid of any validity, can I get you to agree not to use that erroneous lie again?

  • Up next is your abuse of evolutionary theory because you appear to be one of these "micro evolution is real, but macro is not" people. That instantly tells me that you don't know what speciation is. But I want to be fair...could you describe how speciation is supposed to work? I know you don't accept it as true...but just explain to me how science says it happens. (No cheating by copying and pasting something you find on a website.)

  • We've already covered your weak idea of prophecy and history so I see no use in repeating that. Suffice it to say that the city of Troy used to exist so therefore Achilles could only be hurt by stabbing his heal and Helen was a demigod according to your logic.

  • @Ramohog

    The bible doesnt say any of those things.

    It actually says the earth is flat, immovable in space and that the sun and stars revolve around it.

    You should try reading the book you swear by.

  • "all backed up by prophecy"

    Unless there's any specific dates in there i really don't think it qualifies. He didn't "predict" anything, floods famines etc were already prevelant in that time anyway.

  • Pprophecy. Israel becoming a nation again. Returning to their homeland. Jerusalem becoming a cup of tremling. Rise of falsehood and apostacy. The forming if a new world order. ET strong delusion. Possibility of no flesh surviving. Increase in nature disasters. Mark of the beast. One world currency, not being able to buy or sell. The Vatican being the whore of mystery Babylon. The zionist being the synogue of Satan. The Masons being the rich merchants deceiving the world through their sorcery.

  • Show where the bible states those things, SPECIFICALLY. Otherwise You're picking things to place that stuff upon.

    Don't forget, the Earth is 6,000 years old after all. lol.

  • Study end time prophecy. Watch the final countdown by Billy Crone. This is well know to every student of Bible prophecy. You are just being willingly ignorant.

  • "Well. I'm not the one who chooses a demonic name like asmodeous.

    That man will go to hell, because to be born again you need a total change of heart and be filled with the Holy Spirit of power, love, wisdom and comfort.

    In all thy getting, get understanding!"

    lol. If you knew anything, you'd know the correct spelling of that name. I altered it on purpose for certain reasons, dumbshit.

    Every student studies that stuff is not an Xtian, either. So, I'll bet they're going to hell? lol.

  • P.S. Show us before and after pics of this amputee who got their limb back from "God". If you cannot, and are just repeating what You've HEARD, then you're full of shit about that. lol.

    Oh, and mmmmmooooooooooooooooooooooooo­oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo­oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo­oooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!! I mean..

    bbbbbbbbbaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­aaahhahahahahahahahahahahahaha­aaaaaa....

    Just speaking the lingo you understand best.

  • Are you losing Asmo? Is it that little demon inside of making you to that.

    Like Jesus said. A wicked and adulterous generation seeks after a sign.

    The antichrist will give you some. You will fall right into his trap, because you have been perfectly pre-conditioned for it. It will be connected to the prophecized ET strong delusion for those who don't love the truth. Spreading the false alien evolving consciousness gospel. To deceive the whole world as final gateway to hell. Repent!

  • These are either self-fulfilled which doesnt count, or are just blatant lies.

    The bible makes no mention of the vatican or masons.

    There is no New World Order, stop deluding yourself.

    "Possibility of no flesh surviving" Surviving what? Death? Now there is something that isnt obvious...

    One world currency? Where?

    ET strong delusion? What BS is this?

    Mark of the Beast? lol

    And what about the predictions made about Damascus? Why is it not inhabited by dragons like the bible says?

  • @Ramohog

    NWO is not all over the news. What news programs are you watching?

    And thanks for telling me I can find conspiracy theory videos on youtube.

    But you've obviously been driven to this incomprehensible nervous wreck after finding out that people who are more intelligent than you do not agree with your way of thinking. Your reaction to realising you are wrong is just further deluding yourself and spouting nonsensical bullcrap.

  • @Ramohog

    Then why are you not making any sense?

    And why are you calling me dumb when you are the one unable to understand entropy, or the simple fact of "small changes accumulating over long periods of time give rise to large changes"

    Isnt it funny how most scientists (ie clever people) are mostly atheist? And the ones who do have a god, are not religious fruitcakes like yourself?

  • @Ramohog

    So according to your "thoery", no one can win the daily lottery because who ever wins it, wins it by coincidence. =P

  • "ET disclosure.... Probably 2012." Now it's "probably"? Before You'v said "IT WILL HAPPEN IN 2012!" lol. You can't even keep up with your own nonsense.

    Still awaiting the LIST OF EVERY DOCTRINE YOU'VE THOROUGHLY STUDIED before finally settling on the one you redundantly spout like a big conspiracy.

    Bravo.

  • Genetic defects....plauges....natural disasters....thousands of extinct speices....collapsing stars and glaxies.... to think there is some kind of intelligence behind this is foolishness. What do we have an appendix for when there is no use for it....why do men have nipples...why do dolphins have an extra uneeded nostral...why do so many people need glasses, .etc etc

  • Not errors, Mutations.

    Over time these can lead to big changes. Its just further proof of evolution.

    Things dont get "worse".

    The extra junk DNA we carry around and have no need for (like the bits which are programmed to make scales, gills and tails) just dont get used. Having them there isnt exactly harmful.

    There is just no point to it, so proves evolution (which says we evolved from things with scales and tails) or shows that God is retarded.

    Which is it to be?

    Evolution is actually a fact.

  • Willies

  • @Ramohog If you call evolution a random process... I'm sorry, you're completely ignorant on what evolution is.

    You are in reality denial.

  • @Murdulo I call abiogenesis a random process. Evolution is built in to the system in order to sustain life.

  • Anybody know the song from the intro?

  • To put it plainly, our bodies provide the means for our genes to continue into the next generation. Natural Selection causes the genes to be selected for by breeding. The strong ones survive, the weak ones don't.

    What people usually don't seem to understand is that our personalities are irrelevant. Our personalities are adaptations based on combinations of genes acting on their environment. That's partly why the religious side doesn't like evolution. Evolution proves we are not special.

  • @ashleylovesdaddy Our personalities do matter, if they didn't evolution would have eliminated them millenia ago. Species survival is the primary function and our personalities make that possible. Without personality with its directed intelligence we wouldn't HAVE science as a way of controlling our environment. And we can project our personalities and our knowledge forward through time so they can actually affect our species's survival far more than our genes.

  • @colourmegone I would say that Personalities matter in that they help differentiate an individual from another and create diversity within a species. It might be safe to say animals have more of a "Personality" the more diverse their gene pool becomes. I can't say I'm certain of that though.

    Also, I'm not sure we could even hypothetically Not have personalities. Developing Science may be an inevitability of evolving life forms. I think we just use better tools than other creatures.

  • @ashleylovesdaddy Although attribution of personality to other species is hypothetical people with experience of relationships with other animals will tell you they do have personalities. In any event if there were no advantage to our personality evolution would have weeded it out years ago. Personality gives direction to intelligence, in fact it is difficult to imagine intelligence without personality.

  • @colourmegone You seem to be trying to make the same points I'm making but not quite so well. I argue that Personalities are impossible Not to have, in any species that is conscious, or not zombielike. A Personality is the outward expression of the consciousness, and inward probably also. I don't think Personalities in animals is a 'hypothetical' situation. They clearly have personalities. I don't think Evolution can weed out a personality. There will always be some outward expression.

  • @ashleylovesdaddy "You seem to be trying to make the same points I'm making but not quite so well." Oh really?? And I quote "What people usually don't seem to understand is that our personalities are IRRELEVANT." (my emphasis). Do pay attention to your own posts! and try to keep up. It's tiresome having to correct errors in recollection (I give you the benefit of the doubt).

  • @ashleylovesdaddy this isn't exactly accurate. The genes that survive are the ones that are best at making copies of temselves. Nothing more, nothing less. Did you ever see the movie "Idiocracy"?? ;-)

  • @Scrapheap71 We're on the same page scrapheap. I haven't seen the movie yet. It seems like my pile of books to read and movies to watch is doubling weekly.

  • @ashleylovesdaddy Yeah, you'll piss your pants laughing watching Idiocaracy. It's hilarious and disturbing at the same time. ;-)

  • @ashleylovesdaddy Then mutually assured self destruction is the only path open to us. Survival of the fittest is not race against race but every man for themselves.

  • it's called a metaphor, dumbshit

  • Comment removed

  • @formerutuber

    It's called a metaphor, dumbshit.

  • Who's the dumbshit here?

  • Could you read the book?!

  • Yes, we are.

    We are not the replicators, DNA is the replicator. This is where Lamarckian evolution went wrong (acquired characteristincs) and Darwin was right (natural selection of mutations).

  • Actually, the genes are what replicate and spread - that's generally the unit that Dawkins refers to when discussing reproduction and propagation of traits and when referencing the body as the "vessels." So it's not necessarily about the individual but rather the genes that individual carries which continue on (or don't).

  • And that's exactly what I said.

  • Not really. You were basically right, but: You were correcting the body as the replicator with DNA. The DNA is the coding mechanism by which replication is carried out, the gene is the unit which is replicated and carried on. That's the main difference... for example: A computer virus is comprised of code, but cannot be carried on unless all of the code is copied in order (unless a mistake is made which mutates the virus, which doesn't really happen in computers so the metaphor stops there).

  • Oh, yes, you are right. Seems like I confused "gene" and "DNA".

    But what I was trying to say is that the body itself cannot be considered the replicator, since it does not copy itself, even though it is the machine that does this work.

  • 4:27

  • Damn, I mean he's handsome and old now but he used to be fucking gorgeous!!!

  • Amen to that brother!

  • @TheKevinWalker he still gorgeous to me

  • I love love love you Richard gorgeous brains Dawkins : )

  • @theagrafiotis

    If you are happy as you claim, then why you are wasting your time writing that crappy song? xD

  • spending some time with my atheists friends is not wasting of time, i like atheists cause of them i woke up, now i'm on to other things like the root of all evil the Talmud Bible. /watch?v=BEYwTb6ZC9U

  • @theagrafiotis

    Yeah, I know about those thing. Saw them when I was an agnostic. What I mean is the comment of yours not the effect atheism did to you.

  • @theagrafiotis thats beautiful

  • @theagrafiotis wow, sad

  • thats apparent

  • Comment removed

  • we're like hosts for genes

  • @theagrafiotis

    I'm a homo. News flash, we homos stopped being scared of cross-burning rednecks decades ago.

    Sounds to me like you're tired of being in that closet yourself, handsome. Come on out and take a walk on the wild side, and stop hating yourself.

  • Ever notice how all the haters never seem to have any videos of their own on their channels? Notice how they never seem to have any friends? Notice how they are usually only 14 years old and hail from a red state? Pffft hahaha! Dude, don't waste your time with that bedwetter - let's just get our gay on and further the cause of atheism!!! ; )

  • Mouth-breathing 3rd grade education hillbillies.

    God bless the fags, the lesbos and the atheists!!! Merry Christmas.

  • smpaudio. good one lol "Mouth-breathing 3rd grade education hillbillies",,too funny!

  • awsome stuff ty ffreethinker

  • 1:37 look at Dawkins little baby macintosh!

  • @kevlonk: no, deist is something else altogether. a theist believes in a god or religion that is active and in daily life or has power. a deist believes that, most likely, something(a god or something close) kicked off life and no longer has a presence, life, or power to control or concern itself in existence.

    many of the founding fathers in america were deists, not theist and not atheist. which is why so many people are so very wrong about a "christian nation" concept of america.

  • Ah. Again, I stand corrected. My fault for using the term without properly looking it up first. As HWCWTD pointed out, my comments more readily apply to theists than to deists.

  • @kevlonk, Before entering into a discussion you should really understand the terminology used. If you don't know the difference between deist and theist, how can we take you seriously in a religious debate?

    Should atheist point out the flawed logic of religion? Yes. If someone told you they knew an evil monkey lived in their closet, you wouldn't say "well you're entitled to your beliefs..."

  • The bigger problem is that relgion has intruded upon the rest of our lives. It invades politics, school systems, television, and bangs us over the head with their view of the world. When atheists or even followers of a different religion stand up and disagree they are labeled as trouble-makers trying to end religion. Don't shove a cross in my face every time I turn around and I won't point out how absurd your belief system really is.

  • I agree. It is everywhere. For example in the section of the TV on demand that I use, in the Factual section under motoring is supernatural. I had to lie down when I saw that for the first time.

    If you try and explain it then theists just curl into a ball because it means that their parents have lied to them.

  • 5/5

  • Im an atheist, but I don't feel a need for religion to be gotten rid of. I say to each his/her own. If someone wants to believe in some omnipresent, invisible sky-father, then thats their business, not mine.

  • @kevlonk: question, if you realize that the only way religion can continue to exist is by lying to children and teaching them this crap would you still feel that we shouldn't get rid of it?

  • @stojadinovicp: and how religion's continued existence be hurting you, personally? Would you prefer to to barge in on deists and try to make them reject the thing that gives them earthly comfort, for no other reason than that you feel you should?

    I'm all for exposing the hypocrisy and BS of organized religion and fundamentalists, but I am not for imposing atheism on others. That would make me little different from the religious fundies who try to impose their bullshit on others.

  • @kevlonk

    Have you ever been ostracized for your personal belief? Been told you're wrong, you're a sinner, you're evil, vile, despicable, worthless, simply because you don't believe in something someone else does?

    Have you allowed it to happen to another?

    Would you allow it to happen to another?

  • And yet you also cannot deny that trying to eliminate religion could lead to that same kind of ostracism, denunciation, and, dare I say it, hate, that deists (esp. fundamentalists) show for us. I, for one, refuse to sink to the same level of intolerance that I so despise in deists.

  • @kevlonk you mean theists.

  • @HWCWTD: Sorry, my bad, you are correct. I keep forgetting that not all the world's religions are monotheistic.

  • @kevlonk: I'm really sick and tired of this stupid impression that atheist are trying to impose anything on the ignorant??? We are talking about EDUCATION! About REASON and CRYTICAL THINKING! Now, if you equate educating people with imposing knowledge then WOW!

  • speaking of deliberately conscious little gremlins....where's my home enema kit?

  • Forget God. That comes soon enough. Focus on the HERE.........on the NOW. What is going on that is bad, here and now? Focus on that shit, first. Then, in your leisure, you can let your thoughts dwell on God.

  • @2242bzo so true and discerningly worded, cheers and take care

  • @theagrafiotis, Did you teach yourself to read and write? WTF? Unfortunately there is a limt to science because it has to work in the real physical world (not your imaginary land) and is limited by the previous knowledge obtained and the instruments it uses. When you're down in your bunker reading Glen Beck's latest novel ask yourself what has science given the world versus what has religion given the world? Freaking medicine, telecommunications, and the rest of it is a conspiracy! Boogedy Boo!

  • What we believe, or disbelieve in life should be based upon evidence or lack thereof. Richard D. is an atheist according to those very principles. There is no evidence of god, thus forcing an intelligent person to disbelieve the claim. That is exactly how science works! What is your complaint?

  • @theagrafiotis: an educated person would know that "i don't believe" is not the same as "i beleive the NOT". In other words, an atheist is a person that LACKS beliefe in a devine moron in the sky it is not a person that believes god does not exist. There is a big difference there. And with the first, the proper definition it is perfectly OK to say I do not know! I do not know if Unicorns exist and therefore I lack belief that they do.

  • @theagrafiotis

    WOW! you are a major fucktard! A huge fucktard! "Holy" shit, your inability to grasp reality is fucking epic!

  • @theagrafiotis

    Clearly logic is beyond your rudimentary and basic grasp of reality. The more you speak the more ignorance you show. And do not try and label me as a homosexual because I am far too smart to fall for such childish games. Now be a good boy and take such vulgar statements about your own closet homosexuality and go play somewhere else.

  • LOL! You're funny. Trying to be scary online.

    You're still a fucktard.

  • You know I would attempt to reply but your poor insults and lack of correct grammar, made you officially own yourself hahahahaha

  • Hahahahaha - you're a POE, right? You're just too ironically retarded to be true!

  • ok atheists i'm done insulting, but the other guy started first, show respect to get respect that's how i roll, all i said was that science always changing so u can't deny nothing just say we don't know u don't have to make ur own group atheists religion to debunk other religions, we're all humans and they divide us into groups to hate each other, u atheists are so smart but u still join groups and hate others, divide n conquer that's how u rule mankind, peace i'm out.

  • Um...we don't have a shared ideology. We do not subscribe to any book of baloney. No tithing. No meetings. Do all of us who swear that the USA is the best country, or that the Dodgers are the best baseball team or that illegal immigration is ruining us - do we all share a "religion"? You are grasping at straws, sir.

  • thats the whole point of science.Try and prove the a theory wrong until its is proven right

  • Comment removed

  • hell no did u read my last comment, i stopped joining groups a long time ago, all these groups do is create hate between each other, atheists ,christians, muslims, jews they are good in one thing to hate each other, so if u want to be a hater u join groups, i was born human and stay human and all these groups can go to the hate planet and leave humans alone.

  • I don't hate you or anyone else. I'm just looking at your posts and I can't believe tha amount of hate in it. And you declare yourself as religious person? Your God must be proud of you.

  • i'm not religious at all, because i'm not an atheist it doesn't mean i'm religious, i dislike all of them because instead of improving human life they create hate, as for the cursing i did above, the other guy started first, so u get what u give, that's how i roll, i believe we humans if we work together we can make this place a real paradise, the possibilities are endless, that's why i dislike these hate groups cause they divide us so we never get together and fix this world.

  • atheist is term for someone who doesn't join religious groups. atheism isn't a group you join, but by not joining any other groups you are defined as atheist

  • defintely an atheist is someone who doesn't join religious groups, but its only necesary 2 persons to form a group, wheter they are fisically together o a continent apart, the atheist conform a group of people linked by their cosmovision and ideas, they (we) are a group of people who don't need a magic thoughts to understand the world, and to persuit happiness.

    Someone who doesn't join any other groups it's a hermit ;-)

  • Well there are atheist groups but they aren't religious.

  • yes, if you join an organisation promoting atheism. by being a christian you are part of a religious group,  by being an atheist you are not. I see your point though

  • @theagrafiotis that pathetic attempt at a riposte only reduced your credibility even further due to your ignorance, lack of punctuation, grammar and decent insults LOL

  • @volound

    hey I DONT CARE :)

  • "Atheist = No Brain"

    LOL

    More like:

    "Churchie=Sheep=Complete inability to use logic and critical thinking skills"

    You know if all you churchies don't like this video or it's subject matter, you are perfectly free to go watch one of your delusional vids!

    Here on the heretical comment boards like this one we like to speak intelligently and actually know what we're talking about. We also enjoy using big multisylabic words, so it might get a little confusing for you.....

  • What the hell is with the cross at 0:28 ?

  • setting sun behind the Christian cross .... means the end of religion is near

  • I seriously doubt that. They tried to end religion in the USSR and China.....

  • no i agree humankind will never be rid of religion completely ... but thats what the people who made this video want us to think

  • @someguy198949: yes we will... it's just a matter of time... you need to realize that we live at a time when it is, FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY, finally OK to critically EXAMINE this crap and to criticize it and analyze it and therefore destroy every aspect of it... religion is dying... thank god!

  • Christians (I assume) are putting up all this "atheism/evolution is a religion" and "it's just a theory" bull.

    I'm so sick of religious hypocrisy and scientific ignorance especially when it does real damage to other people (science education, abortion, AIDS control in Africa, stem cell research).

    At least there are people like Dawkins who aren't afraid to make a public fuss about all this, especially when many rational people and non-believers have been thinking the same thing for years.

  • @kwolf71

    The sad part is I think a lot of Christians are so delusional because the "science" they are taught is not actual science at all...

    I.E. Human's evolved in 4 steps= Ape just gave birth 2 a human 1 day.

    People are not informed properly nor given a real choice what to believe, they are lied to & indoctrinated at an early age. I was unsucessfully indoctrinated when I was young, because I still saw through the crap (And the scare tactics) & there were too just many contradictions...

  • As the Bible says:

    the religious fool hath said in his heart: atheists have no brain. God punish such religious nuts.

  • Insults are not going to get you very far, especially if they are not true. If you are a Bible Believing Christian, then you need to read the Bible carefully (as Jesus did), and you will remember that God created everything.."The earth is the Lord's and EVERYTHING in it"!!

  • the bible was written years after jesus was meant to have died the 2nd time, so no he didnt read jack sorry bub.

    ~Josh

  • @TheRafaelGunner how do we live without a brain?

  • haha yeah =)

    i show a lot of documentations with another modern scientist and professors who shows with facts that this theory has many gaps...i am not the only one who thinks so...if you think that i am stupid what would you say about the "scientists" or professors" who learned about genetic and so on ???

    in books germany its called "theory".thats a fact,not only what i am said.everybody can write theorys and fake something for example the "piltdown man"(one example)

    so believe what you want

  • @uA58, The instant you say "it's just a theory" you show your total lack of understanding of science. It's like the theme song for creationist morons. Once you read a book or two re-join the discussion. It's not your lack of English skills that makes you sound stupid; it's the fact that you are ignorant that makes you sound stupid.

  • I would agree with this. Evolutionists need to be careful not to read too much into their discoveries about evolution. They are in as much danger as close-minded Christians of closing their own minds. The Theory of Evolution is an explanation, but it is not complete and poses more questions that it asks. These have yet to be answered.

  • The Theory of Graivty is incomplete and leaves a lot of questions yet to be answered. Does that mean you don't believe in gravity? All scientists should be open-minded, but they should only be open-minded to possibilities that have actual evidence for them. Saying that everything is possible makes for an unrealistic approach to the practical world that is cluttered by a lot of bullshit. Start with reality and spend your free time thinking about "what if?"

  • this shit about evolution is only a "theory" so there not enough proofs...there are so many questions that the evolution cant answer...maybe another theory is right but not that bullshit of darwin.any people with logic can see it.

    sorry for my english,i am from germany !

  • @uA58

    You obviously do not know what a scientific theory is then. Look it up, also look at all the proof for evolution. It shouldn't even be debated anymore, yet the idiots do go marching on.

  • Use Draino, just drink it all up, if you get me.

  • @holymoose69

    I don't know, I'm thinkin "Soccergirl" is probably "Sicko Soccer GUY"...

  • thats why i suggested suicide :)

  • hmmgerade ziemlich kuschelbedürftig wer möchte mit mir chilln hab auch ne web cam

  • So, the individual person is of no importance at all, in Dawkins view......

  • @krisking2

    facepalm, in an evolutioniary standpoint, not in a moralistic one.

  • Is there a difference? Surely evolution is everything.