@InternetDarkLord : you are so ignorant. and pretty stupid. let me just tell you you why he's in jail. he's in jail because his dino land museum is strictly a ministry supported museum. in the church when you give offering the church does not get taxed for that by law. people that he is making uncomfortable with his whole creationist view is trying to shut him up. so when you think about it isnt that what satan would want to do. dummy
@swisskid101 You are so gullible, Hovind was caught trying to hide money from the government, on the phone. How do you know what Satan wants me to do?
@InternetDarkLord i dont think that i can explain everything to you just by commenting you on youtube. give me your email address and i'll be glad to explain everything to you.
One has to draw line somewhere. If you believe that Noah's Ark is real you are not holding an legitimate point of view. I don't think you are simply disagreeing with me I think you are either brain washed or mentally ill.
Penn & Teller are full of bullsh!t. They have no idea what they are talking about. Noah's ark is very possible and if you don't believe me read the book "Noah's Ark A Feasibility Study" by John Woodmorappe. BTW, I find it ironic that guys says he’s embarrassed that people attempt to prove that Noah’s ark is true, yet he himself is one of those wing-nut alien hunting tin-foil hat wearing dorks. Seriously, sort yourself out dude.
every mammal, reptile, bird, fish [yes, fish], PLANT, bacteria, virus, et cetera.. in a single boat with one window (cross-ventilation fail..) for half a year... but of course it's plausible
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
@Mogley52 It is really cute how you capitalized Maker, letting us know that you really mean "God" from the bible. No doubt, coincidentally, it is the god you worship (as opposed the hundreds of others that you ignore).
Rationalize all you like, but there is zero evidence for the bullshit creation story from the bible. There is no evidence of Noah, or any of the other ridiculous tales of the bible. You are going to die someday and simply cease to exist. Accept reality. You'll look less silly.
@FlyingPinkUnicorn hahaha thats a stupid name to go along with that stupid comment to Mogley52. i would bet my life that when judgement day comes the first person you would look for is the nearest christian to try and help you save your soul. god said that every idol word will be accounted for. so watch what you say. pink unicorn.
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
HUMAN-CHIMP DNA MYTH: The actual similarity is between 70-87% not 99.8% as commonly believed. The original research stating 99.8% similarity was based on ignoring contradicting evidence. Read the article, "Evaluating the Human-Chimp DNA Myth--New Research Data" at the Institute for Creation Research Site. The similarities are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes, rather than chance. Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC is similar to seeing an earthquake churn-up a few well-formed rocks and concluding from this that earthquakes, if given enough time, can construct a building. Macro-evolutionists take the little things here and there produced by chance and extrapolate it into something extraordinary and then call it science. Notice, all evolutionists begin with a complete species. They don't begin their theory with partially-evolved species, with partially-evolved tissues and organs.
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. For every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing extinction, not upward evolution. Most variations are from new combinations of already existing genes, not mutations.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
The flood is a universal and true story. The story in Genesis is mostly true i.e. most land animals and birds owe their existence to Noah. Other people and animals survived on high places and/or anything which could float for the better part of a year. Greco/Roman and Chinese literature describe that sort of survival for the year of the flood.
One of the 450' wooden trading ships of the early Ming (1420 AD) would have been big enough for Noah's purposes and the animals came to him.
Those creatures would've died due to the conditions, (those who could fit that is). Not to mention some of those animals would've eaten others. How big is this boat anyway? What dose two of every "kind" mean? I'm confused about old Noah and his flood
Wrong, it is fully true, (look what we saw being made)
the small cat, the big dog and the small horse the cells are many they multlied to anther type of color of a cat, but still a cat. For the dinosurus just get two eggs (long time to hach any way ) what about the artifact in polystrate and sedimentary rocks/fossils
@InternetDarkLord Ooh, you are getting into the political side of things…think for a second what is the reason why he is in jail?
Taxes, was his SMALL ‘business’ teaching kids the biblical truth? Was he speaking the same thing? and some political stuff. What is a Church 3 definitions, group of disk jockeys joining together to learn more wisdom, a physical building to meet old malls or restaurants would be less costly or build one, and what about the gov. /taxes spending where? tuff-homework
@InternetDarkLord ‘Somethinglikethat’ any type of robber would be just selfish, ‘look’ at every thing before you respond- as far as politics goes, news, compared to history,
@adrianmolm715 TEN Billions species?? Do you have any idea how large an ark you would need for 20 MILLION animals, even if they were all small?? How much food, how much care, etc, etc, etc,. Also last time I checked eggs need care to hatch, and how would you protect them during planet wide flood??. Learn to speak English AND learn how to think.
@Tiptoetherat For an example of DNA , BUT much (less) BASIC – have our cells be just a x10,b x10,c x10,d x10,and e x10. (that’s basic by 10000’s- for human ‘kind’). First there was Adam & Eve –they had the varieties (apart-self, but we know they had them/cells/varieties together) same with Noah & and his wife (cells cant make new ‘different’ cells-they like to decompose) a x5, b x6, c x2, d x20, e x33. Different assortments like tha, just look at OBAMA’s Parents (they didn’t Adopt him?)
@Glinkaism1 What about people who have seen the Ark by Going up there? like Ed Davis, & George Hagopian and a crew "who cares about old folks they are smarter they we are anyway "
Creatards lately have claimed that all animals were vegetarians before the Imaginary Flood. But fossilized carnivores sometimes have prey inside their stomachs.
@InternetDarkLord why would you want a immoral person who has murdered & cheated people, and your buddies try to get him to stop but he wont. And you are making a good present for all of them, Noah tried to get people to join the boat, but once the door is closed/sorry, they thought he was a fool anyways they had there chance
@InternetDarkLord We aren’t robots, God gives us a Free Will, if we like/obey the basic Hard & Stunning commandments we Will get rewarded for them, just like here on earth were we work hard every day and at the end of the tired day, look at our earning for things we worked so hard for. If some people don’t want to obey the commandments, they wont get there reward
@InternetDarkLord We aren’t robots, why would he want to Make (create) us perfect like him, when He already did that with Adam & Eve.. it is your turn to puss your way to get acquainted with Him and his followers (Angels), by praying to HIM, and obeying
@InternetDarkLord correct, but He gave them the Free Will to start evil in there lives and lives to come-I feel like I am repeating the same Bible verses-
just do some Homework and read starting at mattew (new testament) than just ask a pastor –random questions (that’s what I do)
@adrianmolm715 Yes, you are repeating the same Bible verses. And they are nonsense. A perfect being can never sin. Otherwise, God could sin. Then again, that explains a lot.
@adrianmolm715 No, they would have been imperfect when they decided to eat the fruit, so they were already imperfect, hence God would have made them imperfect. If God had made them perfect, they could never sin, since that is imperfection, with or without free will.
@InternetDarkLord Almost, but they needed a temptation to fumble, for it to be a free will. Otherwise it wouldn’t be a free will, since we have freedom we can do whatever, to act like irresponsible people or we can have some ethics
@InternetDarkLord Yes, but they need a temptation to fumble, for it to be a free-will. Other wise we would be like robots, but I like freedom -also I like to do good freely
@InternetDarkLord we arent robots,,but they needed a temptation to fumble, for it to be a free will. Otherwise it wouldn’t be a free will, since we have freedom we can do whatever, to act like irresponsible people or we can have some ethics
@yesterayshere Anything is possible .. maybe it's possible that he's actually the bad man, in your belief would be comparable to Satan. Imagine that, He is both God, Man, and Satan. Now, that's a Holy Trinity I would actually love to believe.
He can possibly be a omni-prick, omni-asshole, omni-fuckturd, omni-moron, , omni-incompetent, etc, etc. Hey, Everything is possible when it comes to God. He may even be doing Rule 34 on his Son.
@Nilguiri Be nice, not all yanks are crazy, this show being a great example of that. The presence of a few crazy Americans does nothing to take the shine off the ones that are brilliant. Same holds true for England, or any other nation. ;-)
haha, I know that. However, you have more than your share of lunatics, and they are running the asylum. I wouldn't mind so much, but they affect the rest of us. Just look at Bush. He told Jacques Chirac that Iraq needed to be invaded because of Gog and Magog - more bullshit from the bible. Reagan believed that crap, too. in fact nearly all US politicians believe this shit!
Kids' education is being hijacked by these morons and wilful ignorance is rewarded rather then derided.
@Nilguiri "You have more then your share of lunatics" Oye, tell me about it. But trust me when I say that we have plenty of rational folks, and we are NOT giving up any time soon. I think the main reason they keep trying to hijack education is that they are starting to realize that they (fundies) are dying off in this nation. As the precent of atheist and rationalist people rise, well...desperate people do dersperate things.
Amazing how my partner and I heard this story at ages around 8 - 13, and knew then it was not right. So since then we have been non-believers. It has arrived to the day (today) where we feel proud to say, "We are Atheists." Thank you, Thinking Athiests
@GoldenCrusader93 Yep, it's so easy to indoctrinate a young inexperienced mind that think their parents are the smartest people in the world. It should be illegal to teach children about religion until they are old enough to make an informed decision on their own.
@GoldenCrusader93 I would consider it child abuse, not just similar. There's little difference between that and a father (or mother) verbally threatening to personally douse the kid in gasoline and to light them on fire.
1) how did all the animals relocate to their respective habitats when half of the continents hadn't been discovered.
2) Of course there were pure meat eaters in the group. Their survival would insure the MASSIVE extinction of other species considering the fact that there were only 2 each
3) If everyone is dead except for Noah and his family, how did humanity end up in America, South America, ect without any knowledge of the middle east what so ever?
yeah but if you where religious then you would say "i cant believe we even need to ask this question" because you think its obviously true, where if ur not its because you think its obviously not true haha
@BetaDeltaCebu How can you said that the flood is bullshit. The noah myth is not true but they just proved that the flood was actually a reality. Of course Penn forgot that There're hundres of flood myths across the world and not just the middle east.
This is why I find the bible hard to believe...!! Surly the animals would rip each other apart... After all it's on there nature..! And don't tell me they towed the great white's.....! Utter rubbish..!
@Percipient4 Trust me, nobody can tell the bullshit from the real thing. Search youtube for "Pisseth against the wall." Rev. Anderson will explain the problem with Germany, or even Obama, is that the Lord will destroy him who pisses against the wall! You tell me if that's real or fake.
Oh, heck no. The Noah story totally happened. At least this is what I believe. The animals were babies and plus Noah only got one kind of dog, cat, bear, etc. Later over the 4,000 + years those animals evolved into the different breeds that you see today. For instance grizzlies and black bears in the temperate zone while the polar bear goes to the arctic zones. Get it? Evidence for a world wide flood is everywhere. Look at how wavy rock formations are. That was from water.
@rangers94ism dude you have been brainwashed? So you think Noah got billions of baby animals in a boat and then distributed each to the place where each species is found today... Evidence for flood? There is none, you can't just make nonproven statements and say they were proven. Get your facts straight
@rangers94ism So in your comment you acknowledge that evolution is true. If you really think that evolution exists then I'll tell you one thing, it DOES NOT happen in 4000 years. You are irretrievable clearly but how about next time before you leave an utterly moronic comment do your research.
@timmyjunior1 What kind of evolution are you talking about? Because you can cross breed a dog and it does not take 4000 years to do it. If you are talking about F.A.R.M. then I need actual scientific proof. I don't mean 'look at these bones and how similar they are' proof but I want to see the birth happen.
Genesis says the pairs were "male and female", but some animals don't have 2 genders.
Genesis says the pairs were 7 for clean, 1 for unclean, so the entire animal kingdom should be massively inbred, clean animals 7 times less than unclean.
The greatest recorded 24 hour rainfall was only about 2 yards.
The oldest clonal aspen stand is over 80,000 years old.
everyone has to see DR.kent Hovind's dinosour and the bible seminar. it will change you life.
swisskid101 1 month ago
@swisskid101 Yes, you will laugh harder than ever before.
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@InternetDarkLord what do you mean i will laugh?
swisskid101 1 month ago
@swisskid101 He is in jail for lying to the government.
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago
@InternetDarkLord : you are so ignorant. and pretty stupid. let me just tell you you why he's in jail. he's in jail because his dino land museum is strictly a ministry supported museum. in the church when you give offering the church does not get taxed for that by law. people that he is making uncomfortable with his whole creationist view is trying to shut him up. so when you think about it isnt that what satan would want to do. dummy
swisskid101 1 month ago
@swisskid101 You are so gullible, Hovind was caught trying to hide money from the government, on the phone. How do you know what Satan wants me to do?
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago
@InternetDarkLord i dont think that i can explain everything to you just by commenting you on youtube. give me your email address and i'll be glad to explain everything to you.
swisskid101 1 month ago
@swisskid101 No, read the newspapers, etc.
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago
@InternetDarkLord im just a new christian but i would really love to meet you so i could knock you out!
swisskid101 1 month ago
@swisskid101 How Christian to say that!
What about loving your enemies?
Also, I'm about 6 and a half feet tall.
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago
@InternetDarkLord like i said im new to this. god hasnt given up on me yet. WOW 6 and a half feet tall huh? good you can change my light bulbs!
swisskid101 1 month ago
Noah's Ark Checklist:
Mammals : 9,800+
Birds: 18,000+
Reptiles: 15,500+
Insect: 2,000,000+ (Over 1,000,000 Known species - estimated 30,000,000 species)
Annelida: 24,000+
Nematodes: 40,000+
Platyhelminths: 26,000+
Amphibians: 10,500+
(plus all plant life that would not survive salinity)
qotsaandsoadfan1 1 month ago
One has to draw line somewhere. If you believe that Noah's Ark is real you are not holding an legitimate point of view. I don't think you are simply disagreeing with me I think you are either brain washed or mentally ill.
ma049 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Penn & Teller are full of bullsh!t. They have no idea what they are talking about. Noah's ark is very possible and if you don't believe me read the book "Noah's Ark A Feasibility Study" by John Woodmorappe. BTW, I find it ironic that guys says he’s embarrassed that people attempt to prove that Noah’s ark is true, yet he himself is one of those wing-nut alien hunting tin-foil hat wearing dorks. Seriously, sort yourself out dude.
mikebeange 3 months ago
Comment removed
mikebeange 3 months ago
every mammal, reptile, bird, fish [yes, fish], PLANT, bacteria, virus, et cetera.. in a single boat with one window (cross-ventilation fail..) for half a year... but of course it's plausible
DDazzle1 4 months ago 4
I AM A FUCKING GRAPEFRUIT , THOU I AM A VEGTABLE , GET ME ?
RustArtRed 4 months ago
@RustArtRed Sorry, I am the walrus.
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord " Fire Is Fiery, No One Worships the Ash " ?
RustArtRed 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 4 months ago
@Mogley52 It is really cute how you capitalized Maker, letting us know that you really mean "God" from the bible. No doubt, coincidentally, it is the god you worship (as opposed the hundreds of others that you ignore).
Rationalize all you like, but there is zero evidence for the bullshit creation story from the bible. There is no evidence of Noah, or any of the other ridiculous tales of the bible. You are going to die someday and simply cease to exist. Accept reality. You'll look less silly.
FlyingPinkUnicorn 4 months ago 7
@FlyingPinkUnicorn hahaha thats a stupid name to go along with that stupid comment to Mogley52. i would bet my life that when judgement day comes the first person you would look for is the nearest christian to try and help you save your soul. god said that every idol word will be accounted for. so watch what you say. pink unicorn.
swisskid101 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
Mogley52 4 months ago
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
HUMAN-CHIMP DNA MYTH: The actual similarity is between 70-87% not 99.8% as commonly believed. The original research stating 99.8% similarity was based on ignoring contradicting evidence. Read the article, "Evaluating the Human-Chimp DNA Myth--New Research Data" at the Institute for Creation Research Site. The similarities are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes, rather than chance. Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
Mogley52 4 months ago
MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC is similar to seeing an earthquake churn-up a few well-formed rocks and concluding from this that earthquakes, if given enough time, can construct a building. Macro-evolutionists take the little things here and there produced by chance and extrapolate it into something extraordinary and then call it science. Notice, all evolutionists begin with a complete species. They don't begin their theory with partially-evolved species, with partially-evolved tissues and organs.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
Mogley52 4 months ago
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. For every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing extinction, not upward evolution. Most variations are from new combinations of already existing genes, not mutations.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 4 months ago
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
Can't post links on youtube...
For the real story of the flood, do a google search on the three terms:
bearfabrique composite system
That takes you to the bearfabrique page on the pre-flood solar system and the origin of the flood waters.
icebear1946 4 months ago
@icebear1946 Even better, google "Talk Origins."
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord
talk origins is a creation of academic dead-wood. trueorigin org is the general antidote to their BS.
icebear1946 4 months ago
@icebear1946 No, Talk Origins is based on SCIENCE. Creationism is based on bronze age fairy tales.
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
The flood is a universal and true story. The story in Genesis is mostly true i.e. most land animals and birds owe their existence to Noah. Other people and animals survived on high places and/or anything which could float for the better part of a year. Greco/Roman and Chinese literature describe that sort of survival for the year of the flood.
One of the 450' wooden trading ships of the early Ming (1420 AD) would have been big enough for Noah's purposes and the animals came to him.
icebear1946 4 months ago
@icebear1946 How can you tell if that is "mostly true?"
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
Why is the water in the pool brown? :{
RobbytheLion 5 months ago
Those creatures would've died due to the conditions, (those who could fit that is). Not to mention some of those animals would've eaten others. How big is this boat anyway? What dose two of every "kind" mean? I'm confused about old Noah and his flood
KasirRham 5 months ago
Bark! Bark, the lark!
There IS/WAS a Noah's ark.
Get used to it, dickheads.
Glinkaism1 6 months ago
Wrong, it is fully true, (look what we saw being made)
the small cat, the big dog and the small horse the cells are many they multlied to anther type of color of a cat, but still a cat. For the dinosurus just get two eggs (long time to hach any way ) what about the artifact in polystrate and sedimentary rocks/fossils
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Learn to speak English.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord בסדר
ci
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Ja.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord That is Hebrew for- okay,
And sí señor
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Da.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Look up Kent Hovind for a cool speech on dinosaurs (ps. Who likes to pay there Taxes)
He’s great –La de da
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Kent Hovind is a moron, fa la la la, la la la la.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord At least Kent is speaking Facts-
Tis the season to be Joyful, fa la la la, la la la la
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 I believe paleontologists who spend years digging fossils in the field, but not ones in jail for lying.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Ooh, you are getting into the political side of things…think for a second what is the reason why he is in jail?
Taxes, was his SMALL ‘business’ teaching kids the biblical truth? Was he speaking the same thing? and some political stuff. What is a Church 3 definitions, group of disk jockeys joining together to learn more wisdom, a physical building to meet old malls or restaurants would be less costly or build one, and what about the gov. /taxes spending where? tuff-homework
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Yes, and bank robbers are really misunderstood anti-capitalism protesters.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord ‘Somethinglikethat’ any type of robber would be just selfish, ‘look’ at every thing before you respond- as far as politics goes, news, compared to history,
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 I do read history, no flood over the earth there.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 TEN Billions species?? Do you have any idea how large an ark you would need for 20 MILLION animals, even if they were all small?? How much food, how much care, etc, etc, etc,. Also last time I checked eggs need care to hatch, and how would you protect them during planet wide flood??. Learn to speak English AND learn how to think.
Tiptoetherat 6 months ago
@Tiptoetherat For an example of DNA , BUT much (less) BASIC – have our cells be just a x10,b x10,c x10,d x10,and e x10. (that’s basic by 10000’s- for human ‘kind’). First there was Adam & Eve –they had the varieties (apart-self, but we know they had them/cells/varieties together) same with Noah & and his wife (cells cant make new ‘different’ cells-they like to decompose) a x5, b x6, c x2, d x20, e x33. Different assortments like tha, just look at OBAMA’s Parents (they didn’t Adopt him?)
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Your lack of English skills make it impossiable to for me to reply. I honestly have NO idea what you are trying to say.
Tiptoetherat 6 months ago
@Tiptoetherat YOU are wrong and GOD IS RIGHT learn more truth history so that you wont make others bad steps your self, and the nation’s ect…
By moral responsible (hard, I know)
It pays off in the middle,end
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Learn more English so I can speak to you properly. PUTTING THINGS IN CAPS DOES NOT MAKE IT RIGHT
Tiptoetherat 6 months ago
@Tiptoetherat so why are you doing it, (just making a basic RIGHT point)
so go out and learn the RIGHT stuff
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Its called wit and irony. I think I have wasted enough time on you, goodbye.
Tiptoetherat 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 I'll give you a free English lesson. PUTTING THINGS IN CAPS DOES NOT MAKE IT RIGHT I guess its a lesson in manners as well.
Tiptoetherat 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715
Even though English is obviously not your first language, you should be ashamed of yourself; your semi literate ramblings are embarrassing.
Put down your bible, it isn't doing you any favours. Instead, pick up a dictionary and a biology book, any sort of science book, for that matter.
If you carry on like that, you'll end up as president and kill us all.
Nilguiri 6 months ago
@Nilguiri Have you looked at my other comments, mot much about the Bible but referring to the cells and the president (Obama)
Just learn correctness (more)- of history
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
Did you ever see a dream walking? Well, I did?
"Hey, Sid, did you see the ark?"
No, ah, I can't recall who did though."
Glinkaism1 7 months ago
@Glinkaism1 What about people who have seen the Ark by Going up there? like Ed Davis, & George Hagopian and a crew "who cares about old folks they are smarter they we are anyway "
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
Creatards lately have claimed that all animals were vegetarians before the Imaginary Flood. But fossilized carnivores sometimes have prey inside their stomachs.
InternetDarkLord 7 months ago
@InternetDarkLord TRUE, BUT- missing 1 thing, the flood happend with naoh, ect
sin entering the world was with adam ect..
learn more - study- read starting at mattew for the BIBLE /your favorite concept
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 I have read the Bible. Also, Greek and Roman myths, too. Noah's Farce never happened.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord - With Him ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE!
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 So why have a flood at all? He can solve any problem without killing anyone.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord why would you want a immoral person who has murdered & cheated people, and your buddies try to get him to stop but he wont. And you are making a good present for all of them, Noah tried to get people to join the boat, but once the door is closed/sorry, they thought he was a fool anyways they had there chance
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Again, if God can do anything, He can make anyone reform without killing him. So why a flood?
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord We aren’t robots, God gives us a Free Will, if we like/obey the basic Hard & Stunning commandments we Will get rewarded for them, just like here on earth were we work hard every day and at the end of the tired day, look at our earning for things we worked so hard for. If some people don’t want to obey the commandments, they wont get there reward
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Again, if God can do anything, he can make us perfect with free will. Is God perfect, yet have free will? So a flood is still idiotic.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord We aren’t robots, why would he want to Make (create) us perfect like him, when He already did that with Adam & Eve.. it is your turn to puss your way to get acquainted with Him and his followers (Angels), by praying to HIM, and obeying
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 If God made Adam and Eve perfect, by definition, they could not sin. That is imperfection.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord correct, but He gave them the Free Will to start evil in there lives and lives to come-I feel like I am repeating the same Bible verses-
just do some Homework and read starting at mattew (new testament) than just ask a pastor –random questions (that’s what I do)
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Yes, you are repeating the same Bible verses. And they are nonsense. A perfect being can never sin. Otherwise, God could sin. Then again, that explains a lot.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord that's why the fruit of the tree, gave them 'free will' to sin- yes they did, then they were imperfect
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 But if they had no free will, why were they punished for something they could not help?
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord No, they had ‘free will’
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 But if they were perfect with free will, they still could not sin, that is still an imperfection.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord No, they were perfect with free will, they still could sin, that is free-will
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 No, a perfect being would use free will perfectly. Otherwise, they are imperfect by definition.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Yes, that how they got imperfect
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 There is nothing to compare to unless you are trying to make us in to robots, comparison or ‘law and order’ or technology, comparison
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 No, they would have been imperfect when they decided to eat the fruit, so they were already imperfect, hence God would have made them imperfect. If God had made them perfect, they could never sin, since that is imperfection, with or without free will.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Almost, but they needed a temptation to fumble, for it to be a free will. Otherwise it wouldn’t be a free will, since we have freedom we can do whatever, to act like irresponsible people or we can have some ethics
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 Irrelevant: perfect beings can resist temptation perfectly. Otherwise, they are by definition imperfect.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Yes, but they need a temptation to fumble, for it to be a free-will. Other wise we would be like robots, but I like freedom -also I like to do good freely
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
@adrianmolm715 But perfect beings by definition can resist temptation perfectly and never fumble, otherwise God made them imperfect.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@InternetDarkLord we arent robots,,but they needed a temptation to fumble, for it to be a free will. Otherwise it wouldn’t be a free will, since we have freedom we can do whatever, to act like irresponsible people or we can have some ethics
adrianmolm715 6 months ago
In the Hebrew to English translation, 'The World' was considered to be the Middle East.
MilitaryMan006 7 months ago
@MilitaryMan006 Tell creotards like Hovind.
InternetDarkLord 7 months ago
I like to think about Noah's Ark.
Hark, hark the lark.
Dogs go bark.
Beware of the snark.
Glinkaism1 7 months ago
Gods creatures were AWARE of what was to come.. Thee who created such has no powers over his creatures? With Him ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE!
yesterayshere 7 months ago
@yesterayshere If God can do anything, He can solve any problem without killing someone, so why have a flood at all?
InternetDarkLord 7 months ago
@yesterayshere Anything is possible .. maybe it's possible that he's actually the bad man, in your belief would be comparable to Satan. Imagine that, He is both God, Man, and Satan. Now, that's a Holy Trinity I would actually love to believe.
He can possibly be a omni-prick, omni-asshole, omni-fuckturd, omni-moron, , omni-incompetent, etc, etc. Hey, Everything is possible when it comes to God. He may even be doing Rule 34 on his Son.
aimthailaxu 7 months ago
A guy builds a boat and fits every animal in the world on it... but evolution is ridiculous...
mashafasha5 7 months ago
Bark, Bark, Bark
There was a Noah's Ark discovered.
Those who still don't think so, can go back to hiding their head up their butts.
Glinkaism1 7 months ago
@Glinkaism1 Which one?
InternetDarkLord 7 months ago
@Glinkaism1
I'm all in favpour of free speech, but please... shut the fuck up.
You're going to give Brits a bad name. Please leave that batshit craziness to the Americans. That's their job.
Nilguiri 7 months ago
@Nilguiri Be nice, not all yanks are crazy, this show being a great example of that. The presence of a few crazy Americans does nothing to take the shine off the ones that are brilliant. Same holds true for England, or any other nation. ;-)
Tiptoetherat 6 months ago
@Tiptoetherat
haha, I know that. However, you have more than your share of lunatics, and they are running the asylum. I wouldn't mind so much, but they affect the rest of us. Just look at Bush. He told Jacques Chirac that Iraq needed to be invaded because of Gog and Magog - more bullshit from the bible. Reagan believed that crap, too. in fact nearly all US politicians believe this shit!
Kids' education is being hijacked by these morons and wilful ignorance is rewarded rather then derided.
;)
Nilguiri 6 months ago
@Nilguiri "You have more then your share of lunatics" Oye, tell me about it. But trust me when I say that we have plenty of rational folks, and we are NOT giving up any time soon. I think the main reason they keep trying to hijack education is that they are starting to realize that they (fundies) are dying off in this nation. As the precent of atheist and rationalist people rise, well...desperate people do dersperate things.
Tiptoetherat 6 months ago
Noah's Ark was found in a hillside in the ancient world some 20 years ago. It made all the papers.
Therefore you are an ignorant moron. Go lock yourself in the closet and swallow the key.
Glinkaism1 8 months ago
@Glinkaism1 you mean the found a boat on a hillside
samueladams16 7 months ago
Obviously there were 2 arks, the one with all the dinosoaurs unfortunately sunk.lol
deepwoodtickles 8 months ago 7
@deepwoodtickles hahahaha thats a good one
osiris3yhn 4 months ago
when i was a teen i never took these stories serious,it sounded like a bunch of bull..
puncho33 8 months ago
Amazing how my partner and I heard this story at ages around 8 - 13, and knew then it was not right. So since then we have been non-believers. It has arrived to the day (today) where we feel proud to say, "We are Atheists." Thank you, Thinking Athiests
restructuremix5 8 months ago
Which insects, in Leviticus 11, have 4 legs?
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
Look,either put your hand in your pocket or wave it round,decide already! Otherwise great video. :)
milanthegrouch 8 months ago
people who believe in noah's ark are a shame on humanity
thescorpionking2020 8 months ago
people only believe in god because their parents said to them he is real when they were childs
GoldenCrusader93 8 months ago
@GoldenCrusader93 Yep, it's so easy to indoctrinate a young inexperienced mind that think their parents are the smartest people in the world. It should be illegal to teach children about religion until they are old enough to make an informed decision on their own.
jeffl0385 8 months ago
@jeffl0385
i agree
also to scare children with hellfire and other things to make them believe in their religion is similar to
child abuse
GoldenCrusader93 8 months ago
@GoldenCrusader93 I would consider it child abuse, not just similar. There's little difference between that and a father (or mother) verbally threatening to personally douse the kid in gasoline and to light them on fire.
TechnomancerMorhion 8 months ago
@GoldenCrusader93 what do you say to the people whose parents DIDN'T believe and made their own conclusion about it?!
madjack141 8 months ago
Gawd...I can't believe Penn and Teller get away with cherry picking facts *ONLY* from sources that exist in reality.
/sarcasm
jlowe424 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Noah's ark doesn't make any sense b/c
1) how did all the animals relocate to their respective habitats when half of the continents hadn't been discovered.
2) Of course there were pure meat eaters in the group. Their survival would insure the MASSIVE extinction of other species considering the fact that there were only 2 each
3) If everyone is dead except for Noah and his family, how did humanity end up in America, South America, ect without any knowledge of the middle east what so ever?
supernova901 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People who are stupid enough to believe this is real should be put down.
cutes22 9 months ago
LOL it never said anything about species, derp.
ubamilitary 9 months ago
people that believe in religion are embarassing not just noahs ark
johnykoop 9 months ago
Did you realize paleontologists have calculated 500,000 species of dinosaurs existed?That was a very crowded ark!
InternetDarkLord 10 months ago
@InternetDarkLord speaking of the dinosaurs... :P
freebird121212 9 months ago
people believe in this bullshit
thescorpionking2020 10 months ago 33
@thescorpionking2020 exactly, and that is really sad lol.
belladonna4577 10 months ago
I can't believe we even have to ask this question
fionn18 10 months ago
@fionn18
yeah but if you where religious then you would say "i cant believe we even need to ask this question" because you think its obviously true, where if ur not its because you think its obviously not true haha
airfaith 10 months ago
The noah's flood is a bullshit story.
The bible is a bullshit literature.
End of story.
BetaDeltaCebu 10 months ago 58
@BetaDeltaCebu How can you said that the flood is bullshit. The noah myth is not true but they just proved that the flood was actually a reality. Of course Penn forgot that There're hundres of flood myths across the world and not just the middle east.
trufamoon 7 months ago
@trufamoon
"but they just proved that the flood was actually a reality"
er... no they didn't. You really must learn to distinguish fact from fiction or it will cause you great problems when you grow up.
For example, People might mistake you for an ignorant dumbass.
Nilguiri 7 months ago
This is why I find the bible hard to believe...!! Surly the animals would rip each other apart... After all it's on there nature..! And don't tell me they towed the great white's.....! Utter rubbish..!
elliottcharles1980 11 months ago
@InternetDarkLord I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic, man.
Percipient4 11 months ago
@Percipient4 Trust me, nobody can tell the bullshit from the real thing. Search youtube for "Pisseth against the wall." Rev. Anderson will explain the problem with Germany, or even Obama, is that the Lord will destroy him who pisses against the wall! You tell me if that's real or fake.
InternetDarkLord 11 months ago
Oh, heck no. The Noah story totally happened. At least this is what I believe. The animals were babies and plus Noah only got one kind of dog, cat, bear, etc. Later over the 4,000 + years those animals evolved into the different breeds that you see today. For instance grizzlies and black bears in the temperate zone while the polar bear goes to the arctic zones. Get it? Evidence for a world wide flood is everywhere. Look at how wavy rock formations are. That was from water.
rangers94ism 11 months ago
@rangers94ism Bullshit! Just for starters, have you heard of inbreeding?
InternetDarkLord 11 months ago
@rangers94ism dude you have been brainwashed? So you think Noah got billions of baby animals in a boat and then distributed each to the place where each species is found today... Evidence for flood? There is none, you can't just make nonproven statements and say they were proven. Get your facts straight
Dare2Blink 11 months ago
@rangers94ism So in your comment you acknowledge that evolution is true. If you really think that evolution exists then I'll tell you one thing, it DOES NOT happen in 4000 years. You are irretrievable clearly but how about next time before you leave an utterly moronic comment do your research.
timmyjunior1 10 months ago
@timmyjunior1 What kind of evolution are you talking about? Because you can cross breed a dog and it does not take 4000 years to do it. If you are talking about F.A.R.M. then I need actual scientific proof. I don't mean 'look at these bones and how similar they are' proof but I want to see the birth happen.
rangers94ism 10 months ago
More bullshit:
Genesis says the pairs were "male and female", but some animals don't have 2 genders.
Genesis says the pairs were 7 for clean, 1 for unclean, so the entire animal kingdom should be massively inbred, clean animals 7 times less than unclean.
The greatest recorded 24 hour rainfall was only about 2 yards.
The oldest clonal aspen stand is over 80,000 years old.
And so on.
InternetDarkLord 11 months ago
Even with the best bronze age technology, it still takes 50 of any species to maintain its genetic diversity. Only 2 of any animal = extinction.
bandaid7777 11 months ago
Got to question the sanity of anyone who believes a dude put two of every kind of animal in the world on a rickety boat.
KIFulgore 1 year ago
fuck off to everyone who said it was fake. ITS REAL
andrewpark1500 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@andrewpark1500 can you back up your comment? please no insults,,,,,,,,,
AwwCrap66 1 year ago
@andrewpark1500 show us some proof then with out the bible
trndkllr 11 months ago