Tom Campbell: Accessing Information from History: Art, Music, and the Afterlife

[borisZG55]

Then everything is art. I can bet, that whatever I make, draw, or sing, will EVENTUALLY get to someone on emotional level. Maybe 1 out of milion, but it will speak to someone.

I think it is not u good definition of art.

[twcjr44]

@borisZG55,

It only gets to be called art if you make interesting, emotionally satisfying, and inspirational -- otherwise it is just everyday junk. What's art, is in the eye of the beholder.

[borisZG55]

@twcjr44

That is what i ment. Maybe someone will find "everyday junk" emotional insipring. So is it art ? A have somhow different description of art. Maybe you will agree.Something is art, if it touches you in the way that artis ment it. For instance, artist paints a picture of Clown, but he felt "sad, nostalgic.." while painting it. If you can sense that emotion aout of painting, then i think it is art. If you say ITS GREAT HAPPY PICTURE WITH CLOWN, then it is not art.

[twcjr44]

@borisZG55,

It can be defined both ways. 1) As personal to the consumer. Art is a product that is produced specifically for others to appreciate and find value in. All will not find value in the same art product. If you don't appreciate it or find value in it, then to you it is not art to you. 2) As personal to the artist. Art is produced by an artist because it means something to the artist. Art is both. Since we are all IUOCs living in our own reality, everything is personal.

[borisZG55]

@twcjr44

Then, are is everything, and there isnt eny single thing that is not art. Because, out of biilions of ppl, you could find one, that would be reached emotionali with about anything.

I bet (pardon my french), that I could find one person that is touched by my manour.

So art is everything. It is a beautyfull world :)

[whitegirlblue]

Thanks for posting!

[probablechoices]

Fantastic upload Tom, great information, keep going!

[galimir]

what works and what is a market hipe-and do you need at all Hemi Sync even-like there are some of teachers out there,who say its all nothing more than a toy-just lay down and do it,you dont need any high tech stuff etc... So we would really appreciate some input from Mr.Campbell(even with the risk of stepping on some toes of Hemi Sync sellers) on what he thinks works what doesntt,etc...

[galimir]

Like where is the original enthusiasm of Mr.Monroe and the great old days-TMI for example has turned into a place for selling tapes and programs-decades after the Hemi Sync has been mastered and you can find it for free all over the Internet-and still yet there is no breakthroughs with the position of this research in the society and some more wide discussion on the technology-

[galimir]

Actually when a critical number of ppl "have been there" consciously,would be very hard for the contemporary science to keep ignoring the phenomena and watch the other way every time book like My Big TOE comes out... The main problem is ppl have so little motivation,that there are decades of struggling(like in my case for example),to do it finally!

[galimir]

In this sense I really like much more Mr.Monroe's approach of concentrating on the exit itself and letting the ppl create their own conclusions and theories! Right? What ppl are mostly struggling with,is a knowledgeable,accessible and motivating guide,who supports them on the way out,so they can check everything themselves! So I would really want one talk from Mr.Campbell,as the one of the original Mr.Monroe's co-workers and pioneers on HOW.The theory can come later-ppl can do it for theselves!

[galimir]

Good interview-thanks Mr.Campbell.Even though,as many others and the interviewer herself in the beginning,I come back time and again to the same point-HOW DO I DO THIS STUFF-THE EXIT!? HOW? All this talks are great,but I think what we need now is a massive breakthrough with ppl actually getting out,into the greater consciousness system,and creating their own point of view and Big TOEs! Sooooo many ppl struggling with this point,soooo many!

[MBTEVENTS]

unlimitedboundaries.ca/2011/04­/06/tom-campbell-on-frank-kepp­le/

[Skinnymarks]

Hearing the description of how to access the database, I realize that my friend probably prays to the data base and calls it God. I know religious neutral things of this nature have to be, but you have to admit its a curious thought. How would the "point of religion" apply to this understanding of reality. like how people give them self up to god, can you also put that kind of trust in the larger consciousness system and gain such "blessings" so to speak.

[HueyTheDoctor87]

@Skinnymarks

The classical description of God shares a lot of similarities to what Tom describes as the LCS (larger consciousness system). Both are omniscient, omnipotent and compassionate/loving. Both are the Creator of our reality, and both can be described as "inside of us" or a "part of us".

ie. "The Kingdom of Heaven lies within all Men."

[bboystunts101]

I seem to get the idea that in order become love, one has to do this at the "being" level. I am personally trying to do things more for others than before, but wouldn't this just be changing on the surface? Do you just "get it" at the being level at some point after doing good deeds?

[twcjr44]

@bboystunts101,

Yes, that sometimes works if the desire/intent is to change at the being level. The Intent (motivation) driving what you do is key. There is a difference between acting good and being good. Turning the first into the second requires a strong intent at the being level to do so.

[bboystunts101]

@twcjr44 Thanks so much for the reply. Your work really resonates with me. and I've been hoping to actually get to communicate with you somehow. I'm really grateful.

[bboystunts101]

Hi Tom. I've seen a number of your interviews and videos and have been reading the My Big Toe trilogy. From what I've gathered, it seems you propose that the the most important thing to do in our lifetime and our main purpose on earth is to become love. Could you explain how exactly one can do this.

[AutotuneGuy]

is that reality frame when you die the same as ndes? if so why are there hellish ndes?

[HueyTheDoctor87]

@AutotuneGuy

I've wondered this myself after hearing people descrive environments similar to the archetype of Hell. When you die, or during a NDE, you are in the non-physical and as such what you are seeing is likely related to the quality of your consciousness - if you died as a very high-entropy and negative person, you may subject yourself to high-entropy/negative experiences in the non-physical. I could be wrong, would love to hear Tom's input on this. Any info on NDE's Tom?

[twcjr44]

@AutotuneGuy,

Yes, generally the same, but each individual is given what they need to help them along the path of evolution. Perhaps some returnees are given a scary story to provide incentive but more likely it is the result of an individual's personal fear.

[TheRealDAN82]

Another absolute gem!!

[infinitesimotel]

Quality information, thanks.

[motionandcolor]

this is info im looking for. past the first several stages.

[JRep22]

@Snodude, I think you answered your own question. :)

[snodude]

I've soaked in many of your phenomenal interviews and presentations, and one question that's been on my mind is; is it best for someone practicing with achieving the meditative state, for example floating in the void, to practice all throughout their entire day with any and every free thought? Would this be beneficial, or perhaps destructive due to the primary goal of becoming love?

[twcjr44]

@snodude,

You should not withdraw form interaction with others or from your duties to practice meditation. But if you have time available such that it does not distract from your primary business in PMR, you may practice meditation as much as you like until you sufficiently master it. By then, formal meditation should require less and less of your time and attention. Eventually, you may pay no attention to it because your entire life has become one continuous informal meditation.

[discretiona]

loooooove it! Thanks!!!!

[EvitaOchel]

Thank you so much for this Tom and Donna, it was so excellent and valuable to watch. Tom your part about changing the world vs changing ourselves (around 50:00) was priceless - that wisdom always resonates so much with my heart and soul.

[Sh33un]

You can safely skip 78 minutes to Afterlife part.

[HueyTheDoctor87]

@Sh33un

If you are skipping any part of these videos, you are doing yourself a large disservice.

[Sh33un]

@HueyTheDoctor87 Are you serious? There is little new info in these videos. Once you read the books and watched several presentations - that's it. If you need to be told the same things over and over again then you are retarded.

[HueyTheDoctor87]

@Sh33un

If you've read the books and watched the presentations and you're still going around calling other people 'retarded' and being abusive, I pity you. I don't NEED to be told the same thing over and over again - I find it a pleasure to hear the truth spoken so plainly. You said yourself that there IS new information in each video, even small amounts is more than enough to keep me coming back. It's not that I'm stupid, I just enjoy Tom's guidance. Good luck, friend.

[Sh33un]

@HueyTheDoctor87 Ok, I now understand. Although Tom can be much MUCH more hardcore. He just thinks that his audience is not very smart; he spends so much time on basics that he doesn't go beyond. Yes, in that way you can reach more ppl to your work. I prefer Monroe, Moen and Frank Kepple from astralpulse. Did you hear about those guys?

[HueyTheDoctor87]

@Sh33un

Don't assume that Tom believes his audience isn't very smart; he's just attempting to explain reality as a whole and that is a complicated subject, if he repeats himself it's because what he is trying to get across may not be easily intellectually understood. I have not heard of Moen or Frank Kepple, no. But Robert Monroe was a personal friend of Tom - both Tom and Dennis Mennerich worked with Monroe to explore the larger consciousness system.

[Sh33un]

@HueyTheDoctor87 I highly recommend your to view the summary of Frank's findings. Just google the phrase "frank kepple astral pulse" and hit the first link. That's the kind of thing I want to hear from Tom, from his perspective. How many ppl have such extensive knowledge and experience of Wider Reality as individuals from my earlier reply? It is not up to them to digest the material for an audience, it's too precious and rare. Say it like it is however complex or difficult!

[ShahTelevised]

I just can't get enough. =)