Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (185)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • why do members of Darwin's religion always claim their evolution religion is science?

    "it happened Billions of Billions of years ago therefore it is a fact." --- where's the science in this claim?

  • @ikawpipa ya, people keep on believing the evolution conspiracy theory. It is funny how they talk about missing links, the whole theory is missing.

  • @ikawpipa If you kiss a frog, it will turn into a prince. That they will admit is a fairy tale.......BUT WAIT!!! a gigagillian years ago, a frog slowly turned into a prince......"oh ya, that is science." you could not make some thing more stupid up. Maybe it would be stupider to say, nothing exploded.......THAT IS SCIENTIFIC!!!!!!!....it seems this word has turned into a abra cadabra word.

    It seems people need to be reminded of the meaning of this word, time and again.

  • @ikawpipa Science is knowledge gained by observation. Who seen the frog turn into a prince? who seen the gigagillian years go by? The rocks date the fossils, but the fossils date the rocks better.......ALRIGHTY THEN!!!.....did I mention I have some land on pluto to sell?

  • @marigolds44

    Hovind makes perfect sense? All of his 'material' has been debunked hundreds of times. There is no evidence for creationism though, and even if there was evidence, which 'story' do you pick? The christian version? The Islam? The Native Americans? Small African creation stories? You speak of logic, but you obviously don't know jack shit about it.

  • @radioactiveego Hovind makes perfect sense. He does give evidence, will you look into the evidence?

    you should pick the perspective that the evidence will lead you to, when you will chose to look at the evidence.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    I've watched all of his videos; He makes basic science mistakes. He seems to think evolution is the transition of one species to another, ie: a dog giving birth to a cat. That is absurd. He never bothers to read up on the stuff he's so quick to 'attack'

  • @radioactiveego well, you did not understand them very good. try understanding again. I don't think you read up, on how fast your theory is changing, and words are changing these days.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    What's to understand? There's nothing he is saying that is even remotely honest. He doesn't quote any research papers. In pubmed, there are currently 400,000 papers on evolutionary biology. And there are none on creationism. Crestionism is not science.

  • @radioactiveego I don't think you understand. try understanding again. I don't think you read how fast your theory is changing, or understand how fast the meaning of words is changing these days.

  • By the way, here's how credible and honest Kent Hovind is... he's currently serving time for lying about his taxes and shady financial practices. Yup, typical money hungry evangelist.

  • @iz2sicc you should look into the tax laws there before you make accusations you can't back up.

  • @IwillhonorGod Oh, you mean the tax laws that Kent Hovind broke? Yes, I expect you to excuse him out of this.

  • @iz2sicc key question, What Laws?

  • @iz2sicc I think another movie would be really informative for you, would be ether money masters, or the wizard of oz (not the common movie, every one watched as a kid, this one has to do with how money systems work)

  • @iz2sicc A lot of people make the mistake of thinking, every one else thinks like they do. No Kent Hovind is not hungry for money, you are greatly mistaken. and regarding Christianity, you are greatly mistaken, misunderstanding, that Jesus was not devalidated because the world punished and killed him.

  • @iz2sicc If Kent was interested in money, he would have charged for his seminar series, to make a profit, but he did it at cost of materials. Kent could have surely been a millionare just from his seminar series, but Kent was not interested in making money, that was not the purpose of him making those videos, the purpose was to educate people...your greatly mistaken.

  • @IwillhonorGod Kent was and is a millionaire. He did not directly sell his material, but he received plenty of donations for them. He made millions and millions from his theme park. He was charged with 12 counts of tax offenses. 58 federal counts... 10 years is his sentence. This is no light matter. Kent Hovind is a fraud and I'm sorry that you and thousands of others fell, and continue to fall, for him.

  • @iz2sicc How do you know this? that he is a millionaire?

  • @IwillhonorGod Simple... he owns a creationist theme park. The last time I checked, you don't open theme parks with pocket change. You also do not, not make money from having one. He also half-jokingly corrected an evolution supporter in a debate when the money he made off something was brought up. He corrected this person and said "a million". It's on YouTube somewhere, go fishing.

  • @iz2sicc The matter is not light, because it is a screw up of the so called justice system there.

  • @IwillhonorGod Yes, justice system is far from perfect, as such it is impossible to make it perfect. However, this is the same justice system you rely on to keep you safe. It's the same system you must rely on if you ever need it.

  • @iz2sicc no I don't live there. And no I don't rely on my justice system where I live. your mistaken.

  • @iz2sicc don't be sorry about things and people you don't understand. Because you don't understand it, it means nothing.

  • @iz2sicc Kent Hovind was falsely accused, falsely convicted. God help the people that have afflicted the righteous......THEY HAVE A COURT DAY COMING!

  • @IwillhonorGod Yes, it's all a conspiracy. All 58 counts of charges were a conspiracy. He was sent to 10 years in prison because of this conspiracy. Where is your evidence for this by the way? My evidence is Kent in Jail due to being found guilty of his crimes. So the ball is in your court. Prove that he was falsely accused. You might be able to help him out if you can.

  • @iz2sicc The evidence is in the tax laws.

  • @iz2sicc you tube freedom to fascism, I think that will help you understand.

  • @iz2sicc you are a typical scoffer, ether ignorant or lying, I have told you the keys this day, and gave you 3 movies to watch, that you might understand what the truth is. Look into it, or stop wasting your time here.

  • ''Your theory says languages come out of nothing'' I don't remember evolution explaining language?!? I think it has to do with Origin of Species.

    ''Evolution is not Science" WHY DOES KENT LIE ?!?

  • @gregrutz The DNA language.

  • @IwillhonorGod DNA has language? That's news to me. Oh, I see what you mean... you meant that we attribute human constructs to what we see in DNA. Yea, we do like seeking patterns.

  • @iz2sicc we do look for patterns, but we are also built with one. You can look, and you can find also. You know what a language is right?....The DNA contains the information how to build it, and when this knowledge has to be communicated some how, how do you think it is done?....it is through a language, a way of communication that is established.

  • @gregrutz why do you ask flawed questions?

  • @IwillhonorGod Why doesn't Kent know that Biolology is a Science? Does he think Paolontology is Science? Why does he think he can prove every scientist in the world wrong?

  • Just because you believe your an ape or monkey does not mean you have to act like one here.

  • Evolution is a theory of Biology, Biology is a Science.

    Dogs always produce dogs as per evolution.

    Apes make apes.

    That is why humans are still apes.

    Evolution has been observed.

    Fossils prove something live in the past. Breeding population evolve so it does not matter if the fossil had kids.

    There is one kind of evolution.

  • @gregrutz I don't know why you keep on posting on here, your theory, that you believe in, says languages come out of nothing. But you keep posting on here, so your actions don't line up with your words.

  • @gregrutz amazing how you scoffers argue against design, by arguments you design.

  • @IwillhonorGod Why does anything need to be designed? What is wrong with the forces of nature? What is the purpose of gravity?

  • @gregrutz evolution says, there is no purpose, that every thing was an accident. But it seems in the heart of men, some how they are looking for a purpose. They just know, there is one. IF I was say to say some thing random, some one would likely say, what was the purpose of that?....because it is a given that people will speak and do things with a purpose

  • @IwillhonorGod ''evolution says, there is no purpose'' It does? Please show me, what is your source?

    Evoluton says life changed over time.

  • @IwillhonorGod First of all, evolution makes no such claim of being an accident. It simply describes the process of life as we know it. Second, humans don't look for purpose in their hearts. They do so in their minds and it's perfectly normal since our brains are capable of holding such thoughts. You choose to derive purpose from an invisible deity. I derive my purpose from understanding the world around me.

  • @gregrutz But if there is no purpose, what is the purpose of you posting this?

  • @IwillhonorGod What do you think is supposed to have a purpose?

  • The owner of this channel uses the same whitewashed nonsense that has been debunked countless time. 'Creation Science' is congruent with 'Underwater Fire Prevention' Neither are useful, neither make sense.

  • @radioactiveego neither aer useful to you.....because you don't understand them.....yet....and neither make sence......to you....yet.....its ok, just get some understanding, don't take the time to complain that you don't understand. take the time to get that understanding......feel free to look on my channel.

  • @radioactiveego general attacks are not very effective radioactiveego. But you should get to the point, if you can. But if you can get to the point, I am going to debunk your point, if it does not line up with Truth. God Bless Radioactiveego

  • Here is the evidence, the facts, go look. The fossils are layered like this: In the bottom layer of rock are shell fossils, above that is a layer with shells and fish fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish and amphibians fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian and reptile fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian, reptile fossils and dinosaur fossils. No human or bunny fossils are found in any of these layers. No dating method used
  • @gregrutz keep watching

  • There is piles of evidence for evolution. There is no evidence for religion. Dogma has, for 2000 years, made pious claims with nothing to back it up. Funny how science is always defending itself from nutcases like Kent Hovind.

  • @radioactiveego It is a good thing Kent Hovind was not defending religion, But Christianity.

    It is funny how people just make general attacks, but can never get down to the point. It is funny how they say there is lots of evidence, but they can never present the evidence. It is funny how this man, has presented an offer for a large sum of money, if some one could just produce some evidence for evolution......well with all the piles of evidence out their...go and claim it.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    Are you mindless? Christianity is a religion. Just like Islam, and Hinduism, etc. Evolution is science, religion is not. There is piles of evidence for it. Hovind is not a Doctor. He 'bought' his PhD from some crappy online school. I'm sorry your faith in a supernatural space daddy has clouded your rational behavior, but even if evolution was proven 'wrong' one day, there still isn't any evidence for Yahweh.

  • @radioactiveego no I am not mindless, did you notice I am speaking to you? you don't know what a religion is....but since you think that you do you should define that word, what it means to you.....Science is knowledge gained by observation....no one has seen us come from rock soup? Have they? no they have not, therefore by the definition of the word, evolution does not fit....the only kind of evolution, that happens that has been seen is micro....

  • @radioactiveego but regarding micro evolution, and how you poison some one well, you need to mix in some truth with the lies, can't be 100% lies or you will not be able to decieve people well, or poison them well.

    God said in His word, that they would bring forth after their kind....some evolutionists really got a hang up with this word, kind, they do not understand it in the way, that it has been meant.

  • @radioactiveego and in God saying this, They will bring forth after their kind......it is the same thing, as micro evolution. God said, they will bring forth after their kind....so think about it. what does it really mean?.....I think it means they will bring forth after their kind, and they will not be the same....that is exactly the same, but still they are the same kind...with me?

  • @radioactiveego Regarding them bring forth after their kind, God has thought of it first, and designed it, so that is where the credit deserves to go....and that is the truth, in the midst of a multitude of lies, that is evolution.

  • @radioactiveego people blab on about the evidence for evolution......never heard of it

  • @radioactiveego who cares if Hovind is a doctor or not? I don't......understand me?....might as well go for every one reading this.....I don't care about tittles....understand?...just because some one should know some thing about some thing, does not mean that they do.

  • @radioactiveego Who is constantly bringing up these tittles any ways? trying to devalidate some body.....doesn't any one have enough brains to actually just think about what was said, rather than saying......well, I guess, he has such and such a tittle, I guess it must be so......give me a break and show me your tittle that says you have a brain....think about it for your self

  • @radioactiveego Most people are paying a price for some thing

  • @radioactiveego some people don't know the contracts they are in.

  • @radioactiveego did you go to that online school? how do you know that it is crappy? or do you just call it crappy, because they do not kiss the ass of the new world order?

  • @IwillhonorGod

    Online school? No. I went to a real school, and got a real degree.

  • @radioactiveego well, you admit here, you have never been to this school, so what would you know about it? you pretty much admit right here to me, you are a liar. Did they teach you at your so called school not to lie?

  • @radioactiveego sorry you don't know my faith....you know I am a Christian....but you don't know who Christ is....so what does that name mean? to you?

  • @IwillhonorGod

    christ is a fictional character that has no contemporary evidence of existence outside of a questionable book written by ignorant men.

  • @radioactiveego clearly as I said, you don't know Christ.....yet.

  • @radioactiveego These ignorant men you say, that wrote many things that are far ahead of science, even today.

  • @radioactiveego clearly you have not looked into a bible much.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    I know the bible better than you average joe schmoe. It's no different than other religious texts, all nonsense.

  • @radioactiveego I said come on my channel, have you looked into any thing? or do you assume you know it all?

  • @radioactiveego it is funny how you talk to me about my rationality being clouded and then you talk about what is right and wrong. How do right and wrong exist with out God? There is no right and wrong in the perspective of those who reject God. Every thing is relative.....aka nothing is for sure.....that is why people reject God, thinking the rules that God has made are pointless, and with out a purpose

  • @IwillhonorGod

    Right and wrong are a matter of popular perspective. It was common practice for Greek men in Ancient Greece to carry on sexual relationships with young boys--that would be viewed as evil today. Societies and cultures change--as do their views of Good and Bad. Read up on your history. There is so much that can be said about this topic it would take me days.

  • @radioactiveego your exactly how I say.

  • @radioactiveego But you mistake that there is the truth, then the perspective, and it may or may not line up with the truth.

  • @radioactiveego being gay is wrong. Do you understand the purpose of procreation? Do you understand the process of reproduction? Does mans seed grow when it is done this way? Does this way, being gay, bring life or death to the seed of the men?

  • @IwillhonorGod

    So if being gay is wrong, why aren't you outside stoning homosexuals as commanded in the bible?

  • @radioactiveego Because I am a Christian, as in a follower of Christ.....What did Christ do in the land of the living when he came across some one who was in the midst of sexual morality?

  • @radioactiveego I am in the new convent.

  • @radioactiveego words can have a power, that I would say, about 99% of the world does not know about.....it is a great power.....some who have conquered in history, have taken advantage of this....that is the power of words.

  • @radioactiveego We are in the days of grace, but the judgement is coming...

  • @radioactiveego Being gay is wrong today, it was wrong yesterday, and it will always be wrong. Wrong is not dictated by majority opinion....or as you say, popular opinion.

  • @radioactiveego Perspectives change, truthfully they do, but the truth does not, specifically on this subject.

  • @radioactiveego but if, as you say, truth is relative. Is it right, that right and wrong exist?

  • @radioactiveego They think that they will be free....more free if they are free from God, but they do not know what free is.....you need to know the truth, to be free......the truth will not make you free, but the knowledge of the truth will.....if you are free from what is good, are you free?.....if you do not have the knowledge of what is good, are you free?

  • @IwillhonorGod

    If you believe in a 'god' there is no way you have can have free will. Any choices you 'made' or 'make' were already known. It's not logical for you to think so.

  • @radioactiveego it is logical for me to think so. Some time, in the next 24 hours I am going to go to the store, and I know, that there will be a person at the till.....and my knowledge that they will be their, does not take away their free will, or their free will to be their, does it?

  • @radioactiveego evolution has been proved wrong a long time ago. Charels darwin proved it wrong, when he said, if it was ever found that the simple cell was not so simple, then his theory would be disproved. And it has been discovered to day, that the cell is more complicated, than the space shuttle, haveing millions of parts

  • @IwillhonorGod

    Charles Darwin's theory has MOUNTAINS of evidence behind it. Just because it conflicts with your faith doesn't disprove it. Magically, if one day it is proven false, there is still no evidence for creationism.

  • @radioactiveego it was proven wrong a long time ago. The fact that this evolution conspiracy theory conflicts with reality, is the part that disproves it.

  • @radioactiveego it does not take magic to disprove evolution, but if you think it does, I think I would like to sell you some land on pluto.

  • @radioactiveego you know it is funny how, if some one was to say, there is going to be a space shuttle form in my back yard....you would be laughed at. How could this happen? Is there any thing that is in the world that has a design that is not designed? by a designer? there is nothing.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    That argument is a fallacy in itself. If 'god' designed things, who designed god? Circular reasoning is not an answer.

  • @radioactiveego your assumption is that their was a time when God did not exist, but right here on this point, your assumption that time always existed, this is where you are wrong. Because it says in John Chapter 1, right here, in the beginning was.....you could stop right there.....the Word. (that is the Lord Jesus Christ)......in the beginning was......... He existed already,

  • @radioactiveego I speak to you in terms that use time, because I have always been in time, and it is hard to speak in a way, that would express a time, when time did not exist.

  • @radioactiveego in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God he was with God in the beginning. All things were made through him, and with out him nothing was made that was made.

  • @radioactiveego If time always existed, then how could the bible say in the beginning, because that is the starting point, but if their was no starting point, then there was no beginning was their?

  • @radioactiveego I could answer you that way regarding the bible or I could answer you another way. things in the universe are burning....ok? things are winding down, energy is being used up. Looking at heat, if time always existed, every burning thing, that you can see in the night sky has literally had forever to burn out, and it should be then all black, but it is not, and all heat should be dispersed equally, because it has literally had forever to do it. But its not that way.

  • @radioactiveego It says very plainly in the first few sentences of the book of genesis, it says, In the beginning (beginning of time), God created the heavens, (space) and the earth ( matter)

  • @radioactiveego God is not bound by time, though God has stepped into time, in the person of the Lord Jesus Christ. But the bible said, God is a Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in Spirit and Truth. Truly if you don't know what a spirit is, that word will not mean a thing in the world to you.....it is your inner most being.....the hidden man of the heart.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    'god is not bound by time' but yet a book written 2000 years ago by strange authors is proof of someone's existence with no singular evidence?

  • @radioactiveego Do you ever find it funny how this person who you say, does not exist, seems to get it right all the time, about future events?

  • @radioactiveego But if some one would say, oh I believe in evolution, which says the body of man, which is how many more million times complicated than the space shuttle, was made by accident, people accept it, when it is how many million more times ridicoulous.....it does not make sence.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    You've never read any books on the topic you scoff at. Evolution doesn't disprove the bible, unless you take everything in it literally.

  • @radioactiveego it does plainly....clearly you never opened a bible, or have little to no knowledge of it. The bible says very plainly that, their was no death before sin. But evolution says that death, was involved in the process of making man. But the bible says God did it right the first time, he did not have to screw around and made a half working model.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    Have you ever seen a man walk on water, or come back from the dead? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. We live in skeptical times, deal with it. The bible says 'shall have no other gods before me' so that means there are other gods, right? Logic 101.

  • @radioactiveego I have not seen a man walk on water....yet. But regarding miracles, yes I have seen quite a few. last 10 years, quite a few. I would not doubt it though, if I seen more this year, that in the last 10, because God has been showing me how these things work to some degree.

  • @radioactiveego Regarding people being raised from the dead, search raised from the dead. eye witness accounts, and video footage should satisfy you. Do you ever wonder how people got evidence before the invention of the video camera? or all the fancy things we have to day?

  • @radioactiveego I will deal with your skepticism pretty plainly. it is simply a matter of weather you will listen, and look, and set your mind to understand, and take the time to do it.

  • @radioactiveego There is only 1 God. I have a feeling we are going to get into a word study here.

  • @IwillhonorGod IF there is one god and he has a son who is a god, how many gods do you have now?

  • @gregrutz People are a spirit, that has a soul, and live in a body. And people refer to each of those parts at various times, as them selves. Does that make them three?

  • @radioactiveego I don't know if you ever open this book you scoff at, called the bible.....or if you ever set your mind, your self, that you are going t understand this book. But do you ever, if you have looked into it, find it funny, that every thing, this guy, Yahweh, who you say does not exist, says every thing how it is going to happen, before it happens?

  • @IwillhonorGod

    I've read the Old Testament, the New Testament, the book of Mormon, the Quran, writings by the Dalai Lama--and tons of books about Anthropology, Evolution, Philosophy and Cosmology--among other things. Yahweh meets the same criteria as others, the sun gods, the greek gods, et al. No proof.

  • @radioactiveego you must have been then half asleep, when you read the book. You still did not answer my question.....or maybe you don't understand, they are not the same.....did you ever read in the bible where it Jesus says, I am the way the Truth, and the life and no one come to the father but by Me? clearly He said, there is no other way....cleary they are not the same thing.

  • @radioactiveego will you answer my question or avoid it.

  • @radioactiveego Did you know that the guy that discovered oceanography discovered, it in the bible first? He read about the path ways first in the bible, then searched it out, it was not know about before that in the main stream.

  • @radioactiveego Did you know that in the bible it says, that the life is in the blood? but so called science in the past has said, you can have bad blood, and it needs to be drained, and a lot of people died from this blood draining....know that?

  • @IwillhonorGod

    What's your point? The bible made people drain blood and they died from it. I called this faulty medicine.

  • @radioactiveego you missed what I said, read it 100% back wards. The bible said the life is in the blood....not drain your blood as you have said.

  • @radioactiveego Did you know that the way the weather works, is in the book of Job? which is one of the oldest books of the bible. But by the main steam it was only discovered in the last 100 or 200 years? Main stream science does take its time catching up with the bible.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    Did you know that the ancient Indians described weather way before the bible? At least 5,000 years ago, per Upanishadas. I actually did a paper on this a few years ago.

  • @radioactiveego before the bible was written on paper maybe.

  • @radioactiveego Also, did you know that in the book of job it talks about springs in the oceans, that were only discovered, in the last 100 years? and how could, any man, know about these things before the invention of submarianes? think about it....how could they know?

  • @radioactiveego Did you know that, God said through Moses, that 2 times Israel would fall apart and come together? and that has happened? What if I said, some extinct country was going to come back....and it did, that would be amazing agreed?....but what if then, I said, before any of it happened, that it would happen 2 times.....would that not be amazing?....where in history, has this happened before?

  • @IwillhonorGod

    Did you know that in the Egyptian book of the dead it makes a similar 'prophecy' about something else, and it came true?

    One of tom clancy's books makes a claim about going back into Iraq, written in the mid 90s, so I guess clancy should be 'divine'

  • @radioactiveego no I don't know about the egyption book of the dead, and I don't plan on wasting my time on that, I know the best book ever written. It is called the bible. It is called the Word of God....and bless God it never fails.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    And if you studied other religious texts they all make similar claims. That's why religion and the bible are all fairy tales written by ignorant men.

  • @radioactiveego how could I know about this thing you say any ways?....you say a similar thing? well what exactly does it say?

    you should define this divine word you use.

  • @radioactiveego Did you know that in the bible, where Moses and Aron and I think it is Joshua, are fighting a battle, fighting a war.....that God extended the length of that day? to answer their prayer, because they prayed for more time to finish the battle? if you can understand this, you have your absolute proof, chuck missler has a very thorough series on this....talking about the resonant frequencey orbits of mars and earth...and how this happened?

  • @IwillhonorGod

    Getting back to Joshua 10:13. Obviously the sun doesn't move around the earth, despite the church persecuting anyone who tried to say otherwise. Now, apparently the faithful of that time didn't have the slightest clue that the apparent "movement" of the sun was actually caused by the rotation of the earth, so such a story would "seem" plausible to them.

  • @radioactiveego maybe the church did say that at the time, quite honestly their is lots of people in the church, that don't know much, and don't plan on learning much ether....God be the Judge of them. The question that matters is what the bible said about it, what did God say about it?

  • @radioactiveego they understood, how to talk to the one that made the sun. And the church did not yet exist then.

  • @radioactiveego no to them, who did it, they were their. You speak like they heard some far fetched tail, no they were right their, they asked, they received.

  • @radioactiveego it would seem plausible to you, if you would look into it. chuck Missler.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    Chuck Missler argues from faith point of view, and ignores evidence to the contrary.

  • @radioactiveego ah listen for a while....

  • @radioactiveego If you have half a brain, you can conclude from these things, if you take the time to look in to them, that, God exists, He answers prayers, and is not bound by time.....because for that to happen on that day, on that year, on that hour.....it had to be designed from the beginning.....things had to be set on course from the beginning.....just look it up, if you don't, I can't see you understanding this

  • @IwillhonorGod

    Ad homien attacks show your character. The bible is fiction, and the stories written in it are by unverifiable authors at the time when people didn't know where the sun went at night.

  • @radioactiveego ..............if you take the time to look into them

  • @radioactiveego you missed this part.............if you take the time to look into them.

  • @IwillhonorGod

    You have failed to prove anything except your emotional attachment to an invisible friend.

  • @radioactiveego no I have not. I pretty much handed you the answer book, and you complained to me, that you could not see the answers because you only read a few pages of the book.

  • @radioactiveego Chuck Missler might be some one that you would be interested in looking up, I got a bunch of His stuff on my channel here.....you will get the answers if you are motivated enough to take the time to get them.

  • If you say 'evolution' to a scientist, he/she will know exactly what evolution is.

    And it is not the evolution of stars.

  • Comment removed

  • @gregrutz no evolutions says the kinds change, know your theory!

  • @IwillhonorGod And you are an expert on evolution?  And you don't watch the video, did you?

    watch?v=6DDhfqMIqRM

    Evolution done not say anything about KINDS because no one knows what a KIND is. Primates will always make primates. Dogs will always make dogs. If a dog made a cat or a monkey had a human that would prove evolution wrong.

    How do you classify humans? Are you a mammal? A cordate? A tetrapod, do you have 4 limbs?

  • @gregrutz I know enough about evolution to disprove it, when it is defined. You use this word, kind, and then you say, no one knows what a kind is.....so how are you using this word, when you don't understand, what it means? why don't you just say.....I don't know what this word means?

    And why do you say, no one knows, what it means? don't you think their is some people, that know what it means? how could their be nobody that knows what this word means, and this word be in existence?

  • @gregrutz Rock soup to man kind is a pretty big leap. Don't you think that is a pretty big change in kind? that is what your theory says. How about banana's to birds? that is what Darwin believed.

    Darwin said himself, if it would ever be proved that the simple cell was not so simple his whole theory would be disproved....and today, it is known, that 1 cell is more complicated than the most complex thing man has ever made.

    so by his own words the theory is disproved.

  • "If you're not showing all sides of the issue, you're indoctrinating you're not educating."

    True.

  • @character654 Every religion has a creation story and a different creator god. If we teach ''all the sides of the issue'' there will not be time to teach science in science class.

  • @gregrutz knowledge is truth. If some one tells lies, are they knowledgeable? Science is knowledge, and the Lord Jesus Christ who made all things, knows it best. How many things are there in the bible, that science says was discovered in the last 200 years, and here it was in the bible for the last 2000 plus years. The Bible is Truth, best book written on the face of the earth, through all time, bar none. open it, before you take some one elses word for it.

  • @IwillhonorGod So we knew the earth was flat and the men who wrote the bible say it is a ''circle'' and comfirmed it. I can draw a circle on a flat piece of paper.

    Does the bible say there was a world flood? Then it is wrong.

    Any college science student can prove Kent wrong.

    Astonomy proves him wrong.

    Geology proves him wrong.

    DNA proves him wrong.

    But he thinks he can prove every scientists in the world wrong, and every dating method wrong.

    Your hero is in prison !

  • @gregrutz men did not write the bible....to pens write books?...I would ask the same of printing presses to you?

    What exactly does the bible say about it? in the orginal texts, the original word?

  • @gregrutz I don't know what to say about your circle you can draw.....ummmm....I don't know what your expecting.....good job? or....what?....I see you can use a computer to some degree, so I think it fairly obvious that probably, you can draw a circle....do you think that is a fair assumption?

  • @gregrutz yes, the bible says their was a world wide flood. But just because the bible said, does not make it wrong. You have not listened well to Kent Hovind because he has proved that their was a world wide flood.

  • @IwillhonorGod Kent proves there was a flood by saying ''Fossils don't count'' and the Geologic colunm does not exist. Open you eyes.

  • @gregrutz understand why a web of lies is more effective than a single lie. That is the deception you are bound by. If you had 30 peices of knowledge in a circle, and some one taught you part by part....when they would teach you part 1, you would say well what about part 2, and when it came to part 2, you would say what about part 3.....and when it came to part 30, you would say, well what about part 1, when it has already been shown you.

  • @IwillhonorGod All the pieces fit together so you conclude it is a 'web of lies'' ?!?

    Every scientists in the world is wrong or Kent is wrong. And Kent is brainwashed.

  • @gregrutz maybe any college student thinks they can, honestly love to see them try. When you got a foundation of truth, you just can't loose. And bless God....Kent Hovind stands on a Rock that is unbreakable, and unshakable. 

  • @IwillhonorGod Kent is not standing on a rock, he is in prison for fraud !

  • @gregrutz Astronomy does not prove him wrong. study time, and tell me weather time is a constant...that is the key question. IF you say it is a constant, then I am going to ask you why, 2 atomic clocks in the world, at different altitudes ( I said that for a reason), are different, and do not keep the same time, when they are identical, and the most precise time keeping devises we have on the earth?

  • @IwillhonorGod The speed of light is constant.  It only goes so fast. We can see stars that are 100,000 light years away. That means the light left the star 100,000 years ago.