Wasn't the building a planned demolition so it wouldn't fall ontop of the surrounding buildings? It was missing half of its side and was gonna fall eventually.
since they went ahead with this planned event that was doomed to be exposed, im guessing they dont really care because by the time enough people start actual protests, the whole world would have undergone changes and we'd probably all be living in a new world order and it makes it harder for us innocent citizens of planet earth to fight back.
You know what so funny...Of all the planning these tyrants probably did, of all the advanced set up and control centers they got ready, of all the people involved they planned to kill and then actually murdered...Well it was that little number 7 building that just seemed to be a nasty thorn in your side. You pulled it off so well. Everything was made so easy by the media. But that little number 7 building just wouldn't fall. And now it's gonna do you in guys. 7 is the number of heaven,it's god.
Satanist insider says "We will give the termites word when to bring down the system, just like WTC7 - I mean, didn't anyone pick up on the significance of the number '7'or the building's trapezoid shape?" from
What no one has been able to explain to me is if the government is smart enough and capable enough to wire the building for demolition without being detected, why didn't they blow the building at the height of confusion so that no one would notice? It is stupid to wait 7 hours before blowing it. If they are as smart as you claim, they would blow the building when WTC 1 or 2 came down so that when the dust settled, WTC 7 was gone too.
@Snotlaw1 that would have made it even more suspicious. why would it have come down if nothing hit it. they let the fires go on so they had an excuse as to why it came down. also take a look at what companies where in that building and also what evidence against Enron and citigroup to name a few was lost for ever when that building came down.
You don't need smarts to wire standard demolition equipment. Just money and complete access. They aren't smart at all. They made so many mistakes it's hilarious that ANYONE buys the "official" story. The "government" didn't carry out 9/11...the correct wording is SOME PEOPLE in the government and connected to government carried out 9/11. A lot of folks in government are good people. We're talking about a VERY small amount of VERY rich and VERY corrupt men.
oh man! Do you not know that a burned piece of paper fell from the twin towers into building 7 and melt the bases of the building?!!! We, the conspiracy theorists, are pathetic. Aren’t we?!
One of the best pieces of footage I have ever seen, this unquestionably proves building 7 was a controlled demolition, and opens the door to breaking up the entire official story which frankly is total BS, thank you for posting this
The entire base of the building's structures had to of been blown. you can't have a massive failure like that without demo work done. I've seen buildings gutted by fire and still stand. I've seen building ransacked by hurricane force winds and still stand. Whatever was in that building, they made damn sure no one was going to find it
WTC 7 sustained severe damage during the collapse of the north tower. To say it didn't is just lying. It's been ten years now. You guys are morons to continue perpetuating these controlled demolition fantasies.
@dpaanlka Well then why are you still looking at these videos if it's been 10 yrs and you still believe the original bullshit story? Unless you're here trying to bring the people who can think for themselves back inline
There's no way anyone can watch this + NOT conclude that it is a classic controlled demolition. It makes no sense to think that BOTH towers *AND* build. 7 ALL collapsed STRAIGHT DOWN perfectly -- all on the same day. No leaning, no random divergence from that perfect STRAIGHT DOWN collapse. Does that mean the "experts" who DO plan out (very carefully) controlled demos are all BS ARTISTS? Buildings fall STRAIGHT DOWN whether you carefully plan out the expertly placed explosives, or not. WTF?
@TimothyWenk Are you blind or just stupid? Here you have one of the rare videos where the building falls to the SIDE, and you dare to write it falls straight down.
When are you dickheads going to start taking your pills?
@dpaanlka Kinda had the entire WTC 1 and 2 fall on it, just saying, having a 100+ stories of mterial falling on it juuust might destroy it... WTC 7 wasn't hit seriously by that, and only by fires.
I love how this video does not show the initial collapse of the Northeast truss seconds before the building collapsed. The Northeast truss collapse redistributed the weight to the two other remaining trusses, causing them to fail eight seconds later.
How was the building damaged if it was never hit by a plane? Being only 300 feet away from the twin towers, WTC7 was damaged by debris in the towers 1 and 2 collapse.
@ImPuLSeShAdoWz See but NIST (Nation INstitute of Science and Technology) said it sustained NO structural damage from WTC 1 or WTC 2. It collapse from fire.
@Karafox91 not true the NIST investigation concluded that the structural damage didnt play an important rule in the collapse not that there wasnt any so dont start nit picking pieces to fit your conclusion! the reason was that the fire got out of control and not enough water was used to prevent it resulting in a floor beam near column 79 to expand a push a girder off its seat causing floors to collapse around column 79
@Vinny86100 Soooo, the heat was so intense it expanded steel girders so much that it tore through at least 2 STEEL bolts, and the building was built so poorly constructed that the loss of one girder, which merely was pushed out of its seat, would cause the collapse of the entire building? Seem rather far fetched.
@azar783402 thanks, I know that here on YT there r a lot of disinfo agents and I can only block them cause I don't want to waste my time with liars cause it's like talking to a monkey, I have a suggest for u go on
Google patents search:
search for "THERMITE DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE" and surprise!U will find 1997 patent N°5698812 from "United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army" about thermite cutting charges for demolitions.LOL
It's one of the very reasons I'm ashamed to be an American. We'd rather believe in a lie, than hear the truth......it's very sad and pathetic. I've said it many times and will keep on saying it: 911 was an INSIDE JOB!
I'm tired to fight with the kind of debunkers that only can insult,but never gives answers.I only want to be sure you to know that the biggest part of WTC steel was SOLD after 9/11, before analysis!In a very fast cover-up operation.U can read about that here:
Watch the video of building 7 explode/flash during the collapse of the other towers, they hid the detonation of building 7 in the smoke of the other building collapsing.... They weakend it so that it would come down later with a small detonation
Anyone who believes these conspiracy theories has their head so far up their ass, they are their own human centipede... wtc7 fell quickly because the fires burned for hours and right underneath the floors that were burning, was a substation... (for those of you who dont know)... substaions are generally pretty open to allow for cooling. SO, we have a weakend infrastructure above an already empty area... NO SHIT WTC7 FELL FAST...God, when any of you actually find pictures of bombs on beams lmk
@admx94 You would make sense in believing this bull shit story if the buildings were framed out of wood. You are obviously ignorant. Believers of the official story are victims of ignorance.
All AIRPORTS HAVE WHAT??? video surveillance and yet NOT
ONE VIDEO of the hijackers boarding the planes has EVER BEEN
RELEASED.The one with ATTA is from his connecting flight out of PORTLAND AND NOT the hijacked flight. These dumb duh'bunkers can't even show ANY OF THE HIJACKERS BOARDING PLANES...Duh'bunkers = Zero Science,
Robert David Steele has 25 years of combined service in the CIA and the US Marine Corps. Steele said, “The U.S.government did not properly investigate this [9/11] and there are more rocks to be turned over,” and added, “I'm absolutely certain that WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition and that, as far as I'm concerned, means that this case has not been properly investigated. There's no way that building could have come down without controlled demolition”
It wasnt a "Controlled Demolition", im going to shut up some of the theorist and so called "experts & engineers". WTC7 was hit by the MASSIVE North Tower steel panels when the North Tower collasped and after the North Tower collasped it was a big opening in Building 7. To sum it all up here it is why WTC7 collasped, 1.HEAVY North Tower Debris 2.Small **UNCONTROLLED** Fires 3.Generators in WTC7 exploded weakening the building. Yes, they are small things but all of those small things add up.
@AccessDenied55 or... controlled demolition... you know the goverment said in a report that it was fires...then they siad wait it wasnt that it was a big panel from the north tower...then they say no wait it was bad construction... well no it was controlled demolition and here is a fun fact... the ones behind this inside job had secret documents in wtc7 that incriminated them in alot of scams hmmm..lets destroy that bulding too since we are at it...ups..problem solved
@shithappens667 How am I stupid? No one got killed in the collaspe, its just a building. WTC7 is rebuilt and looks great. Next time your in New York or If you live in New York ride pass it.
@AccessDenied55 you are saying IT IS NOT a controlled demolition.. while it obviously is... and you i just fucking mentioned the popel behind 911 had INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE AGAINST THEM SO THEY WANTED TO GET RID OF IT (hint hint THE GOVERNMENT!!) ... so you are also ignoring that... and just dont give a shit your governemnt staged this whole fucking thing as long as NO ONE IN WTC7 DIED! ohohohoh ok what about the rest of the victims of that day...
@shithappens667I have respect for the victims, my cousin was a firefighter who BARELY made it out(Like 2 minutes before the collaspe). Hey, it might not have been "melted steel" plane going at 500+ MPH can do some damage. It wouldnt take a idiot to figure that out, when the planes hit the towers, columns and supports were knocked out and it was only a couple left supporting the upper floors.
@AccessDenied55 but it would take an idiot to not beleive common sense, hundreds of scientists, engineers, architects and laws of physics to figure out this is bullshit... also how the fuck has neverbefore in HISTORY a skyscraper collapsed when hit by a plane or cos of fire, which the goc said was the supposed cause
@shithappens667 There's a first for everything, I don't see why that is really a point massively against the "official" story, especially given that most buildings that are on fire are not hit by massive aeroplanes. Plus only a fraction of the total scientists, engineers etc (1,500 out of hundreds of thousands) agree with it being a demolition. That's much less than <1% of the total, hardly a concensus
@911Infowarrior True, but it was hit by considerable debris from a massive skyscraper, making massive holes in its structure which weakened the whole building. Add to this fires around the building which raged for a number of hours, weaking the structuring even more. Therefore how is it surprising that the building collapsed?
@TheGamanic hooly shit people are retarded... government disinfo shiils... i hope your 5 $ hourly wage you get from cia to sit in your basement and post crap is worth your soul
@shithappens667 So you didn't even try and counter what I said using logic or argumentation. Great way to convince people that you are right. Stop using the ad hominem and calling people "shills" just because they don't agree with you, it makes you look pretty childish.
@TheGamanic yeah i hate when people do that.. :P i agree with you but there is no way i can possibly tell you of all the evidence over ytube, i have a fucking life.. dont wanna sit here arguing for days... i mean first of al lthey find military thermite in the rubble, silverstein (the owner) insures the wtc complex explicitly agaisnt terrorist attacks a few weeks before the attack and gets 5 billion in damage... the bush owned corps got filthy rich on going to iraq...
@shithappens667 I understand that, but it is a pretty good way to not present evidence by saying it would take too long to go over it all. Do you happen to have a scientific paper stating explicitly that thermite was present in the rubble, and that it could have only come from explosives? Or a document showing Silverstein insuring the building against terrorist? Just I like sources...
@TheGamanic you think i bloody bookmark every source about something i find so that if someone asks i can provide sources... dude think logically here... they said it was jet fuel that melted the columns... now we know that the jet fuel burned out after 15 mn and even so that jet fuel was not hot enough to melt steel... thats something you can easily look up yourself... do you ask for a scientific journal that proves 2+2=4 when your teacher says so?
@shithappens667 How do you know the source is reliable then, any old person could have made up that story, that's why I want story. As I said, jet fuel structurally weakens the building by 50% or more (depending on temperature obviously) and with the impact of the planes, that would have severely damaged the buildings, so them falling down is not beyond comprehension.
@TheGamanic actually it is when you have 100s of logical fallacies... soooo how do you know the scientific journal isnt utter crap.. do you know government scientists can tell you that fluoride in water is good for you...guess what it fucking aint its poison... or aspartame found in most foods... the thing is you research like a motherfucker and you sipher the truth out from countless sources, scientific journals included bot not restricted to, thats how you find the real truth
@shithappens667 So what hundreds of logical fallacies am I making to reach my conclusion that it is not reasonable to believe that the buildings could not have possible fallen down due to the impact of the planes/fire damage? The reason a scientific peer review is reliable is because it is vetted by numerous experts in the field and not the views of a solitary individual who has little to no respect among their peers like those who hold up many conspiracies.
@TheGamanic haha you have no idea how the world works.. son the rich and the powerful can do whatever, bribe whomever and destroy whoever questions them... fine look up pilots for truth(dot)com and engeeners, architecs and soemthing soemthing (dont remember) for truth..there is your scientific evidence...
@shithappens667 The rich are very powerful, but that shows that they could do it, not that they did it. If you are talking about Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth, they represent 1,500 such people, out of 100,000s of people in those jobs. They are a tiny minority who believe it was a controlled demolition. Unless you believe that governments across the world silenced through money, kidnapping, killing dissenters to the "official" story...
@TheGamanic n they cut your freedom with the patriot act and all kinds of unconstitutional laws cos everyone was afraid...the bin laden tapes cia showed are proven, one of them shows another guy clearly not bin laden and the second one is a CGI for fucks sake... so anyway you cant look at this from a morally standpoint but from a bussiness one... and you havent done any research about this if you stil think a few office fires took the towers down... watch a few documentaries about 911 then post
Hah, the steel melted? Kiss my dick. Nearly the entire building was intact while it collapsed. Looks just like any other building undergoing controlled demolition.
@FIGHT1FOR2CHANGE3 Well, considering NIST, the God of the debunkers, also acknowledges that the building collapsed in 5.4 seconds, I'd say the so called 'debunkers' (mostly government disinfo douche bags) look even more ridiculous and uneducated now. This is high school physics people - plug the bitch into a HS physics software program, and get the number of seconds the collapse took.
Free-fall acceleration (unequivocally impossible w/o cutter charges, plain and simple), in 5.4 seconds.
@FIGHT1FOR2CHANGE3 One can time the collapse starting whenever; it is arbitrary.
Of course, we want to measure acceleration, not time. Acceleration is a change in velocity. Acceleration itself changes; it is proportional to force. Physics says F = MA. In the case of freely falling objects, neglecting air resistance, A = 9.8 meters/second squared.
NIST found 2.25 seconds of free fall acceleration, followed by LESS than free fall acceleration for the rest of the descent.
Well holy shit it's PoetryHound! I watched these WTC 7 videos THREE fucking years ago, and you were the only one supporting the Gov't story. You gotta be on their payroll! Or you should be!
@rseveran lol! that's a fuckin guarantee - anyone supporting their stupid theory with such dry-labbed conviction is being paid, or benefiting somehow by continuing the lie.
When you ear professional on National Geographic channel talking about how difficult it is to do such a good job, how could ever a random accident do something so perfectly done???
The Government contractor that took down the towers and building 7 is called Controlled Demolition Inc.This is the very same contractor that rigged the building from day one of its construction. If I can find this kind of info on my own then imagine what we can find out if we worked together.
@domimomi1992 In a building full of CIA, DoD, Secret Service, IRS, SEC and financial institutions? Al Qaida just walked in and planted bombs, eh? Okay, I'll answer you. -I- say Al Qaida didn't do it.
lmfao people .OH MY GOD YOU CAN SEE THE DETONATIONS!!!. fuckin idiots if you knew anything about structures... its called when the building collapses there is so much pressure from the building falling its blows out the windows. if it was controlled demolition you would need a blast big enough to cut through steel AKA SEEING THE FUCKING EXPLOSION NOT DUST!!!!!!
From what I know, demolitions takes a few days for preparations, either they had the 100 FASTEST CREW in the world working together, or its been set to be demolished even before 9-11
@WickeDiLLusionZ The plans to take it down were build into the building from the very begining. What you want to look for is the demolition sceme for the WTC. No building in NYC can be build without one. There you will find all the answers if this demo sceme is not classified.
This is CGI (Computer Generated Images) Why is the building mostly white and not brow? Where did that gigantic smoke cloud come from? Of course no background is shown. The colour of the sky looks surprisingly real. Have a look at all the different colours of the sky in the live news broadcast and notice that there isn't any background anywhere. The TV footage is so obvious fake that it is ridiculous: watch?v=FcXdIlAK0e4
Note how it falls backwards at the end...and it's not even at the ground yet, there are still several stories to fall as you can see that the buildings blocking the view are several stories tall which you see at 0:18 when the camera pans out...
...this is why the side of the building is laying on top of the WTC7 rubble pile...and why Truther claims of a "straight down" collapse is false
wow! look at the raging fires in wtc 7! no wonder it fell! too bad they dont show this on fox news. but like the zapruder film in re jfk's assassination it would be to educational as to what is really going on in this country.
This was definately a conspiracy! They have managed to keep a hush on WTC7 EVEN FALLING! I had no idea that 3 buildings "collapsed"... everyone always says it was only the first two! Shocking!
Look at 0:44 , there is a bright flash over the building. At first I thought it might be a window or some metal reflecting the sunlight. This is not the case, its an explosion that propells a burning object FAST to the right. Could this possibly be a shape charge detonating and the burning object be the metal surrounding the charge being propelled to the right?
you are fucking retard wtc 7 was not bomb a fire started in the bulding at 8.45am then wtc depre fell on top of it and the fire burned till 6.00 pm theres gas tanks in basment that why it fell at the beging of the base god LEARN YOUR FACTS
@spainking1 Actually NIST reported that the damage from the collapses of the twin towers had no relation to the collapse of World Trade Center 7....oh and btw at first they tried to play it off as gas tanks exploding but NIST as did earlier reports had to admit that there was no gas tank explosions. I think you may need to learn your facts.
Great footage - haven't seen this one. Wow, that is even more obviously a controlled demoltion. There is even a couple of flashes visible, one in particular - about 5 floors from the top on right hand side at 0:04
10 years,,,,,,,, hmmmmmm, and we're still waiting for the JFK files to be released. I give it another 75 years for a BIT of real information about 9/11 is "made public".
So when we're all 140 years old- we will know the truth, can't wait!!! yahoo! f@kin hypocrites
John Farmer, senior council for the 9/11 commission is already admitting false testimony in the 9/11 commissions final report. As well the whole gold scandal under tower 5 is beginning to see light thanks to the no good economy. As well, in "The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Vol. 2" , Niels H. Harrit of the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, ........
confirmed red-gray flakes found throughout multiple samples of WTC dust are actually unexploded fragments of nanothermite, an exotic high-tech explosive. So maybe sooner than we thought : )
Its amazing how many cowards there are in America. All these people murdered... yet family members just sit back, acccept the 9/11 payoff money, and weep. Fukin beyotches..LOL!
Anyone interested in the truth needs to see this video from Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.
*911 Blueprint for Truth - The Architecture for Destruction - With Richard Gage, AIA*
The events of 911 are not a Liberal versus Conservative issue, and they're not a political issue, they are in fact a criminal issue. All three towers were brought down by controlled demolition.
If you liked this video and are interested in learning alot more then please check out my channel, there is lots of full videos on there as well as videos in parts right now and hundreds of related videos in my playlists and im adding more and more all the time. We need to stick together as youtube continues to shut down these channels and videos, so please subscribe or add me as a friend... THANKS TO EVERYONE WHO TAKES THE TIME TO CHECK OUT MY CHANNEL!
Fuck you and fuck the government this is bullshit! 911 was a fucking inside fucking job!! i have had enuff of this fucking bullshit, this is it, this is the last fuckin chance, if we do nothing on 9/11/09 then the fucking war is over, there will be hell to pay on 9/11/09 this is our last fucking chance or we are done! god bless please help us....
tonydayna: be quiet man, do you want to end up in Quantanamo bay? and be tortured? are you fucking stupid? You can't talk like that about the government, they have the power to destroy you, me, and everyone else on this planet who doesn't agree with them. Just act like George Orwells character at the end of the novel, blend in and keep quiet and go with the flow. Welcome to the New World of the United Slaves of America.:)))
It's so obviously a controlled demolition. The reason they wont happily admit that is because it takes weeks if not months of preperation to rig a building that size with thermite. Then they are forced to explain why they want to demolish a building the same day a so-called terrorist attack takes place. We all know the answer.
...And we are told fire weakened the "over-engineered" steel structure forcing it to collapse - a first in history. Those who believe this ought to look at the recent skyscraper fires that burned for days on end without collapse. Just youtube 'burning skyscraper doesn't collapse' - or something.
There are many things incorrect with your statement.
One, many steel framed buildings have collapsed due to intense fires.
Two, that burning skyscraper you were talking about was engineered completely different. WTC7 was a tube within a tube. Meaning that the wide open floors went long distance (70') without being assisted by columns. Creating open office space but also vulnerabilities to cause the floors to sag.
However that "Burning Skyscraper, or what I think is the unfinished Beijing Hotel, doesn't collapse because its steel trusses are much shorter and much stronger.
Ex.
Put two bricks 3' apart, put a 1/4" board over the bricks. Then put the bricks 1' apart. Which way do you think is sturdier?
indeed, and they will say when they have no choice that they took down wtc1 and 2 for reasons of safety and kept it quiet, although that time may never come, it never came for JFK.
Well that should do it, i think if you have seen this video you should be able to safely say that this building was demolished, if anyone thinks otherwise i would like to hear your explanation of why this building fell.
Ok clearly there was fire in the building, but even more evident is the fact it was blown out of it by force of mgravity pulling the building down in near perfect speed. The smoke and the down current the sparks and embers that can be seen blowing out of the roof of the building and then falling down on top also at the same rate of speed as the building, free fall. Also please watch the new north tower video. It really brings it home to why 9/11 is so important, because this is TREASON! -think
We all saw planes fly into the towers and the pentagon (the talk of a missle has to be sheer lunacy).That said, a discussion on whether the government planned the whole thing can perpetuate indefinitely because there is no proof to the contrary. There are also those who insist that there was more than one gunman who assasinated JFK and the government is hiding the captured UFO that crashed at Roswell. The fact that BinLaden and his cronies planned this whole thing remains the obvious...
...conclusion to me although I haven't been personally involved in his capture and can't answer to those with conflicting views. Perhaps Rex Tomb doesn't have all the information that he should? It's all speculation at this point.
I would love to see the plane that flew into the pentagon, since you say "we all saw it"...pass on the footage to back this up please..(message to Techklec)
Look at the security video and talk to the witnesses. What about the aircraft wreck that was removed from the building? How about talking to the family members who lost loved ones? Are you delusional?
Hey, we know who is delusional here...show me the footage from the security video, you and EVERYONE ELSE have seen it so I just want the link to see it too. Simmer down now!
Simmer down? I'm cool...I have a clip that I will send you but i just got done sending a few out and I'm getting the red "Please Wait" flag right now.
TECHKLEC , stop wining about the family members that died and blah blah blah..ass! What do you want to make clear with your stupid remark anyway then?? Please explain.
TECHKLEC , ok , once again then: What do you want to make clear with your stupid remark anyway then?? Please explain!! You being a Vietnam veteran(you claim to be one) should know better, you overpatriotic brainwashed imbecile.You murdered children and women, when you die a lot of souls will finally get some rest, you disgusting piece of terrorism.
That is news to me. While I presently live in Virginia, I am originally from the NYC area and was in the general vicinity when the attack took place. There are two people that I personally knew who perished along with three families of two others whom I did not know directly and all of the families that I know are satisfied with the knowledge that the actual "culprits" got killed in executing their deeds while the "leader of the pack" is still on the lam.
TECHKLEC , I know some Vietnamese, there grand fathers and grandmothers were stabbed to death with american baynonets, between the dying body and the knive the yanks did stick a pokercard with a message on it. Give me your adress so their grand children can visit YOU to make clear what they feel.Loser.
TECHKLEC , 19 radical jihadists? Dude, 40! And about 35 were from Saudi Arabia, go and bomb the fat Dollar Arabs, they are accountable for 9-11, NOT Afghanistan, NOT Iraq.
Nearly every member of my family is military or ex-mil. I was going to join the Marines, but my wisdom, brain power, and willingness to take what I now realize was sage advice from a extremely highly-decorated vietnam veteran with whom I know took me on a different direction. Maybe you have not had this courtesy of blind luck in your life, nor horrible experiences I have had, but you are here and can hear now -- you can't claim ignorance.
You are fully willing to accept it. And this reminds people like "911infowarrior" of reactions had by those who were exposed to the Reichstag fire on the 27th of February, 1933.
I would not try to hurt people like you or the family members or anyone in general. I played solo trumpet for a special musical ceremony in memorance of those lost on 9/11 ten days later, in front of hundreds of people for your information.
Gee, Patriot Act, Disregarding Geneva convention, torture, invasion of Afghanistan. We can't get a simple and honest investigation of 9/11 first off all? I mean, without those like the website you defamed, we would have what to call facts ANYWAY?!?!
The basic problems is that you are fine when there is the possibility that the govt lied about reason to invade Iraq [leading to death of over 1 Million People, plus injured and plus future radiated and killed by unexploded munitions], but when it comes to their conclusion of 9/11 [which was biased and non-investigatory therein the reason why several prominent widows, children and other as well, of the deceased have demanded such]
There's really just too much information on this subject for me to sift through since I'm not trying to sell anybody on what I think...it's all too big to do anything about anyway. However, I do think that we could probably agree our government is too big and screwed up to sucessfully execute any kind of conspiracy while keeping it quiet. But, even if it did, more people than just me would be affected and Il'l just have to go with the flow while keeping things around me 'cocked and loaded'.
Bureaucracy you would say leaves no one to fall through the cracks then, too? And you definetely think that no group within government agencies could move towards a goal [in essence a conspiracy]? Tell that to Hitler, who was nearly blown to shreds by his own men. Tell that to kids who get molested by Catholic priests. Tell that to me after the abuse I experienced growing up from various different power structures, organizations and people. Tell yourself you've never conspired.
Your arguement is full of holes. Sure, there are real conspiracies, but to believe this event was planned by some secretive government agency is like believing in the tooth fairy.
Wasn't the building a planned demolition so it wouldn't fall ontop of the surrounding buildings? It was missing half of its side and was gonna fall eventually.
TheGirlWhoGames 3 weeks ago
my questions is WHY WTC 7 COLLAPSED? I DONT GET IT
erickjimbo 3 weeks ago
I've landed in that crazy tin foil hat brainwashed truther sheeple part of YouTube again :(
stebecool 1 month ago
@stebecool troll
Moreofthesamez 6 days ago
since they went ahead with this planned event that was doomed to be exposed, im guessing they dont really care because by the time enough people start actual protests, the whole world would have undergone changes and we'd probably all be living in a new world order and it makes it harder for us innocent citizens of planet earth to fight back.
machicniii 4 months ago
OFFICE FIRES SHEEPLE! I SAID OFFICE FIRES! Hahahaha.
shaygahweh 4 months ago
You know what so funny...Of all the planning these tyrants probably did, of all the advanced set up and control centers they got ready, of all the people involved they planned to kill and then actually murdered...Well it was that little number 7 building that just seemed to be a nasty thorn in your side. You pulled it off so well. Everything was made so easy by the media. But that little number 7 building just wouldn't fall. And now it's gonna do you in guys. 7 is the number of heaven,it's god.
Kittlionheart 4 months ago
video of explosions liveleak.com/view?i=e46_1316112224
jomdeluise 4 months ago
Same explosions:
watch?v=OBKix7iMbCQ&
Satanist insider says "We will give the termites word when to bring down the system, just like WTC7 - I mean, didn't anyone pick up on the significance of the number '7'or the building's trapezoid shape?" from
henrymakow (DOT) com/fozsdyke.html
Nutplucker 4 months ago
Comment removed
Nutplucker 4 months ago
What no one has been able to explain to me is if the government is smart enough and capable enough to wire the building for demolition without being detected, why didn't they blow the building at the height of confusion so that no one would notice? It is stupid to wait 7 hours before blowing it. If they are as smart as you claim, they would blow the building when WTC 1 or 2 came down so that when the dust settled, WTC 7 was gone too.
Snotlaw1 4 months ago
@Snotlaw1
It's b/c CD is the official government counter conspiracy. Research Judy Wood to find out what happened to tower 1&2.
HKmaroLS1 4 months ago
@Snotlaw1 that would have made it even more suspicious. why would it have come down if nothing hit it. they let the fires go on so they had an excuse as to why it came down. also take a look at what companies where in that building and also what evidence against Enron and citigroup to name a few was lost for ever when that building came down.
fromashestoflame 3 months ago
Comment removed
Defcon458 3 months ago
You don't need smarts to wire standard demolition equipment. Just money and complete access. They aren't smart at all. They made so many mistakes it's hilarious that ANYONE buys the "official" story. The "government" didn't carry out 9/11...the correct wording is SOME PEOPLE in the government and connected to government carried out 9/11. A lot of folks in government are good people. We're talking about a VERY small amount of VERY rich and VERY corrupt men.
Defcon458 3 months ago
@Defcon458
"We're talking about a VERY small amount of VERY rich and VERY corrupt men."
LMAO, you just described the "truth" movement. Minus the rich of course.
ExposeTheTwooferCult 1 month ago
oh man! Do you not know that a burned piece of paper fell from the twin towers into building 7 and melt the bases of the building?!!! We, the conspiracy theorists, are pathetic. Aren’t we?!
jomanjy09 4 months ago
@jomanjy09 You're an idiot.
NowKillYourself 4 months ago
One of the best pieces of footage I have ever seen, this unquestionably proves building 7 was a controlled demolition, and opens the door to breaking up the entire official story which frankly is total BS, thank you for posting this
rwdford 4 months ago
The entire base of the building's structures had to of been blown. you can't have a massive failure like that without demo work done. I've seen buildings gutted by fire and still stand. I've seen building ransacked by hurricane force winds and still stand. Whatever was in that building, they made damn sure no one was going to find it
fccwatch 4 months ago
WTC 7 sustained severe damage during the collapse of the north tower. To say it didn't is just lying. It's been ten years now. You guys are morons to continue perpetuating these controlled demolition fantasies.
dpaanlka 4 months ago
@dpaanlka Well then why are you still looking at these videos if it's been 10 yrs and you still believe the original bullshit story? Unless you're here trying to bring the people who can think for themselves back inline
unclenewy 1 month ago
There's no way anyone can watch this + NOT conclude that it is a classic controlled demolition. It makes no sense to think that BOTH towers *AND* build. 7 ALL collapsed STRAIGHT DOWN perfectly -- all on the same day. No leaning, no random divergence from that perfect STRAIGHT DOWN collapse. Does that mean the "experts" who DO plan out (very carefully) controlled demos are all BS ARTISTS? Buildings fall STRAIGHT DOWN whether you carefully plan out the expertly placed explosives, or not. WTF?
TimothyWenk 4 months ago
@TimothyWenk Are you blind or just stupid? Here you have one of the rare videos where the building falls to the SIDE, and you dare to write it falls straight down.
When are you dickheads going to start taking your pills?
endimion17 4 months ago
Hey the WTC Hilton wasn't hit by a plane either it must be a conspiracy!!!
dpaanlka 4 months ago
@dpaanlka Kinda had the entire WTC 1 and 2 fall on it, just saying, having a 100+ stories of mterial falling on it juuust might destroy it... WTC 7 wasn't hit seriously by that, and only by fires.
Karafox91 4 months ago
I love how this video does not show the initial collapse of the Northeast truss seconds before the building collapsed. The Northeast truss collapse redistributed the weight to the two other remaining trusses, causing them to fail eight seconds later.
How was the building damaged if it was never hit by a plane? Being only 300 feet away from the twin towers, WTC7 was damaged by debris in the towers 1 and 2 collapse.
ImPuLSeShAdoWz 5 months ago
@ImPuLSeShAdoWz See but NIST (Nation INstitute of Science and Technology) said it sustained NO structural damage from WTC 1 or WTC 2. It collapse from fire.
Karafox91 4 months ago
@Karafox91 not true the NIST investigation concluded that the structural damage didnt play an important rule in the collapse not that there wasnt any so dont start nit picking pieces to fit your conclusion! the reason was that the fire got out of control and not enough water was used to prevent it resulting in a floor beam near column 79 to expand a push a girder off its seat causing floors to collapse around column 79
Vinny86100 4 months ago
@Vinny86100 Soooo, the heat was so intense it expanded steel girders so much that it tore through at least 2 STEEL bolts, and the building was built so poorly constructed that the loss of one girder, which merely was pushed out of its seat, would cause the collapse of the entire building? Seem rather far fetched.
Karafox91 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@azar783402 thanks, I know that here on YT there r a lot of disinfo agents and I can only block them cause I don't want to waste my time with liars cause it's like talking to a monkey, I have a suggest for u go on
Google patents search:
search for "THERMITE DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE" and surprise!U will find 1997 patent N°5698812 from "United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army" about thermite cutting charges for demolitions.LOL
bernuga 5 months ago
@azar783402
I've got your back
BTek4 5 months ago
@azar783402
It's one of the very reasons I'm ashamed to be an American. We'd rather believe in a lie, than hear the truth......it's very sad and pathetic. I've said it many times and will keep on saying it: 911 was an INSIDE JOB!
BTek4 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ae911truth org
rzabsko 6 months ago
ae911truth
rzabsko 6 months ago
I'm tired to fight with the kind of debunkers that only can insult,but never gives answers.I only want to be sure you to know that the biggest part of WTC steel was SOLD after 9/11, before analysis!In a very fast cover-up operation.U can read about that here:
bollyn.com/document-the-selling-the-world-trade-center-steel
bernuga 6 months ago
Watch the video of building 7 explode/flash during the collapse of the other towers, they hid the detonation of building 7 in the smoke of the other building collapsing.... They weakend it so that it would come down later with a small detonation
qazzzie 7 months ago
@qazzzie can i has link?
shithappens667 6 months ago
Anyone who believes these conspiracy theories has their head so far up their ass, they are their own human centipede... wtc7 fell quickly because the fires burned for hours and right underneath the floors that were burning, was a substation... (for those of you who dont know)... substaions are generally pretty open to allow for cooling. SO, we have a weakend infrastructure above an already empty area... NO SHIT WTC7 FELL FAST...God, when any of you actually find pictures of bombs on beams lmk
admx94 7 months ago
@admx94 You would make sense in believing this bull shit story if the buildings were framed out of wood. You are obviously ignorant. Believers of the official story are victims of ignorance.
timrocket2008 7 months ago 2
@admx94
WTC7 was NOT even hit by a plane and is not even close to the twin towers. It was a controlled demolition. WAKE UP!!
BTek4 5 months ago
@BTek4 Really not even close? it is 300 feet away!
How about you watch this video and reevaluate.
/watch?v=GGfx_KQuX0Y&feature=related
ImPuLSeShAdoWz 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Partial list of people with excellent credentials that
don't believe the ''official fairy tale story'' of 9-11-01
1,503 VERIFIED Architects & engineers (NUMBERS KEEP GROWING!)
41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans(FBI,CIA,NSA)
200+ senior military intelligence service,law enforcement & government officials.
300+family members * 250+pilots * 400+medical professionals
400+professors * 200+Artist & entertainers
patriotsquestion911 . com & AE911TRUTH . ORG
bongojim420 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All AIRPORTS HAVE WHAT??? video surveillance and yet NOT
ONE VIDEO of the hijackers boarding the planes has EVER BEEN
RELEASED.The one with ATTA is from his connecting flight out of PORTLAND AND NOT the hijacked flight. These dumb duh'bunkers can't even show ANY OF THE HIJACKERS BOARDING PLANES...Duh'bunkers = Zero Science,
100% Bush / Obama Regurgitation.
bongojim420 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
READ the ''TOP 40 REASONS to DOUBT the OFFICIAL STORY of 9-11-01''
& ''25 RULES of DISINFORMATION'' on 911TRUTH . ORG
bongojim420 8 months ago
Robert David Steele has 25 years of combined service in the CIA and the US Marine Corps. Steele said, “The U.S.government did not properly investigate this [9/11] and there are more rocks to be turned over,” and added, “I'm absolutely certain that WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition and that, as far as I'm concerned, means that this case has not been properly investigated. There's no way that building could have come down without controlled demolition”
PATRIOTSQUESTION911 . COM
bongojim420 8 months ago 2
@bongojim420 Appeal to authority much?
TheGamanic 8 months ago
It wasnt a "Controlled Demolition", im going to shut up some of the theorist and so called "experts & engineers". WTC7 was hit by the MASSIVE North Tower steel panels when the North Tower collasped and after the North Tower collasped it was a big opening in Building 7. To sum it all up here it is why WTC7 collasped, 1.HEAVY North Tower Debris 2.Small **UNCONTROLLED** Fires 3.Generators in WTC7 exploded weakening the building. Yes, they are small things but all of those small things add up.
AccessDenied55 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AccessDenied55 Controlled Demolition expert on 9/11 /watch?v=l6D4dla17aA
bongojim420 8 months ago 3
@AccessDenied55 or... controlled demolition... you know the goverment said in a report that it was fires...then they siad wait it wasnt that it was a big panel from the north tower...then they say no wait it was bad construction... well no it was controlled demolition and here is a fun fact... the ones behind this inside job had secret documents in wtc7 that incriminated them in alot of scams hmmm..lets destroy that bulding too since we are at it...ups..problem solved
shithappens667 8 months ago
@shithappens667 What's the big arugement about it? No one got killed in the collaspe, so I dont know what this debate is about XD.
AccessDenied55 8 months ago
@AccessDenied55 nigga you just went full retard... you never go full retard... no really u stupid or something?...
shithappens667 8 months ago
@shithappens667 How am I stupid? No one got killed in the collaspe, its just a building. WTC7 is rebuilt and looks great. Next time your in New York or If you live in New York ride pass it.
AccessDenied55 8 months ago
@AccessDenied55 you are saying IT IS NOT a controlled demolition.. while it obviously is... and you i just fucking mentioned the popel behind 911 had INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE AGAINST THEM SO THEY WANTED TO GET RID OF IT (hint hint THE GOVERNMENT!!) ... so you are also ignoring that... and just dont give a shit your governemnt staged this whole fucking thing as long as NO ONE IN WTC7 DIED! ohohohoh ok what about the rest of the victims of that day...
shithappens667 8 months ago
@shithappens667I have respect for the victims, my cousin was a firefighter who BARELY made it out(Like 2 minutes before the collaspe). Hey, it might not have been "melted steel" plane going at 500+ MPH can do some damage. It wouldnt take a idiot to figure that out, when the planes hit the towers, columns and supports were knocked out and it was only a couple left supporting the upper floors.
AccessDenied55 8 months ago
@AccessDenied55 but it would take an idiot to not beleive common sense, hundreds of scientists, engineers, architects and laws of physics to figure out this is bullshit... also how the fuck has neverbefore in HISTORY a skyscraper collapsed when hit by a plane or cos of fire, which the goc said was the supposed cause
shithappens667 8 months ago
@shithappens667 There's a first for everything, I don't see why that is really a point massively against the "official" story, especially given that most buildings that are on fire are not hit by massive aeroplanes. Plus only a fraction of the total scientists, engineers etc (1,500 out of hundreds of thousands) agree with it being a demolition. That's much less than <1% of the total, hardly a concensus
TheGamanic 8 months ago
@TheGamanic WTC7 was not hit by a plane....
911Infowarrior 8 months ago
@911Infowarrior True, but it was hit by considerable debris from a massive skyscraper, making massive holes in its structure which weakened the whole building. Add to this fires around the building which raged for a number of hours, weaking the structuring even more. Therefore how is it surprising that the building collapsed?
TheGamanic 8 months ago
@TheGamanic hooly shit people are retarded... government disinfo shiils... i hope your 5 $ hourly wage you get from cia to sit in your basement and post crap is worth your soul
shithappens667 8 months ago
@shithappens667 So you didn't even try and counter what I said using logic or argumentation. Great way to convince people that you are right. Stop using the ad hominem and calling people "shills" just because they don't agree with you, it makes you look pretty childish.
TheGamanic 8 months ago
@TheGamanic yeah i hate when people do that.. :P i agree with you but there is no way i can possibly tell you of all the evidence over ytube, i have a fucking life.. dont wanna sit here arguing for days... i mean first of al lthey find military thermite in the rubble, silverstein (the owner) insures the wtc complex explicitly agaisnt terrorist attacks a few weeks before the attack and gets 5 billion in damage... the bush owned corps got filthy rich on going to iraq...
shithappens667 8 months ago
@shithappens667 I understand that, but it is a pretty good way to not present evidence by saying it would take too long to go over it all. Do you happen to have a scientific paper stating explicitly that thermite was present in the rubble, and that it could have only come from explosives? Or a document showing Silverstein insuring the building against terrorist? Just I like sources...
TheGamanic 8 months ago
@TheGamanic ermm.. all this is documented... it takes you 1 sec to search up ''thermite''and ''911''
shithappens667 8 months ago
@shithappens667 Yes but I want an actual peer reviewed scientific journal with that in? Surely that would be easy to do it
TheGamanic 8 months ago
@TheGamanic you think i bloody bookmark every source about something i find so that if someone asks i can provide sources... dude think logically here... they said it was jet fuel that melted the columns... now we know that the jet fuel burned out after 15 mn and even so that jet fuel was not hot enough to melt steel... thats something you can easily look up yourself... do you ask for a scientific journal that proves 2+2=4 when your teacher says so?
shithappens667 8 months ago
@shithappens667 How do you know the source is reliable then, any old person could have made up that story, that's why I want story. As I said, jet fuel structurally weakens the building by 50% or more (depending on temperature obviously) and with the impact of the planes, that would have severely damaged the buildings, so them falling down is not beyond comprehension.
TheGamanic 8 months ago
@TheGamanic actually it is when you have 100s of logical fallacies... soooo how do you know the scientific journal isnt utter crap.. do you know government scientists can tell you that fluoride in water is good for you...guess what it fucking aint its poison... or aspartame found in most foods... the thing is you research like a motherfucker and you sipher the truth out from countless sources, scientific journals included bot not restricted to, thats how you find the real truth
shithappens667 8 months ago
@shithappens667 So what hundreds of logical fallacies am I making to reach my conclusion that it is not reasonable to believe that the buildings could not have possible fallen down due to the impact of the planes/fire damage? The reason a scientific peer review is reliable is because it is vetted by numerous experts in the field and not the views of a solitary individual who has little to no respect among their peers like those who hold up many conspiracies.
TheGamanic 8 months ago
@TheGamanic haha you have no idea how the world works.. son the rich and the powerful can do whatever, bribe whomever and destroy whoever questions them... fine look up pilots for truth(dot)com and engeeners, architecs and soemthing soemthing (dont remember) for truth..there is your scientific evidence...
shithappens667 8 months ago 2
@shithappens667 The rich are very powerful, but that shows that they could do it, not that they did it. If you are talking about Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth, they represent 1,500 such people, out of 100,000s of people in those jobs. They are a tiny minority who believe it was a controlled demolition. Unless you believe that governments across the world silenced through money, kidnapping, killing dissenters to the "official" story...
TheGamanic 8 months ago
@TheGamanic hah yeah you go live in your imaginary fantasy world and continue to do their bidding...
shithappens667 8 months ago
@shithappens667 Likewise for yourself. If you want to believe that unscientific crap and become a paranoid nut, be my guest
TheGamanic 8 months ago
@TheGamanic n they cut your freedom with the patriot act and all kinds of unconstitutional laws cos everyone was afraid...the bin laden tapes cia showed are proven, one of them shows another guy clearly not bin laden and the second one is a CGI for fucks sake... so anyway you cant look at this from a morally standpoint but from a bussiness one... and you havent done any research about this if you stil think a few office fires took the towers down... watch a few documentaries about 911 then post
shithappens667 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHY IS THERE NO SOUND????
corrigami81 9 months ago
Who wants to start a demolition business? We can save so much money on explosives by simply setting buildings on fire.
tjp5295 9 months ago
Hah, the steel melted? Kiss my dick. Nearly the entire building was intact while it collapsed. Looks just like any other building undergoing controlled demolition.
JMX2280 9 months ago
Explosives! starting from the bottom in a linear pattern to the very top. CLEAR AS DAY!
dobberdoss 10 months ago
I see buildings turning to dust as they fall.
JZJYRWO 1 year ago
lol i love how debunkers say this collapse was 18 seconds when it was clearly no more the 10 at the very most...7 seconds at the least
FIGHT1FOR2CHANGE3 1 year ago
@FIGHT1FOR2CHANGE3 Well, considering NIST, the God of the debunkers, also acknowledges that the building collapsed in 5.4 seconds, I'd say the so called 'debunkers' (mostly government disinfo douche bags) look even more ridiculous and uneducated now. This is high school physics people - plug the bitch into a HS physics software program, and get the number of seconds the collapse took.
Free-fall acceleration (unequivocally impossible w/o cutter charges, plain and simple), in 5.4 seconds.
mit26chell 11 months ago
@FIGHT1FOR2CHANGE3 One can time the collapse starting whenever; it is arbitrary.
Of course, we want to measure acceleration, not time. Acceleration is a change in velocity. Acceleration itself changes; it is proportional to force. Physics says F = MA. In the case of freely falling objects, neglecting air resistance, A = 9.8 meters/second squared.
NIST found 2.25 seconds of free fall acceleration, followed by LESS than free fall acceleration for the rest of the descent.
Skeptic121 10 months ago
Suspicious video. I don't think that the black edges on that white building are a normal feature of real footage.
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
Well holy shit it's PoetryHound! I watched these WTC 7 videos THREE fucking years ago, and you were the only one supporting the Gov't story. You gotta be on their payroll! Or you should be!
rseveran 1 year ago
@rseveran lol! that's a fuckin guarantee - anyone supporting their stupid theory with such dry-labbed conviction is being paid, or benefiting somehow by continuing the lie.
mit26chell 11 months ago
To me, that was a "perfect" demolition job.
When you ear professional on National Geographic channel talking about how difficult it is to do such a good job, how could ever a random accident do something so perfectly done???
Just asking...
PierreLewin 1 year ago
The Government contractor that took down the towers and building 7 is called Controlled Demolition Inc.This is the very same contractor that rigged the building from day one of its construction. If I can find this kind of info on my own then imagine what we can find out if we worked together.
mwcdx 1 year ago
WATCH LOOSE CHANGE FINAL CUT ON GOOGLE VIDEOS
hoxran 1 year ago
ok who says it has to be the government??? I guess al qaeda couldnt place bombs in the building
domimomi1992 1 year ago
@domimomi1992 check out my play lists on 911 and stay calm.
kansasisaband 1 year ago
@domimomi1992 In a building full of CIA, DoD, Secret Service, IRS, SEC and financial institutions? Al Qaida just walked in and planted bombs, eh? Okay, I'll answer you. -I- say Al Qaida didn't do it.
OneVoiceMore 1 year ago
Great shot at .44 of the building falling to the south. So much for claims that it fell symmetrically.
PoetryHound 1 year ago
@PoetryHound LMFAO @ .44!
You must be Larry Silversteins' own personal fluffer, fellatio-hound! LOL!
noozilander 1 year ago
It may be a 'flash' from debris reflecting in the sunlight... watch?v=owyqt-8RnKI
I'm all for the movement man but this might explain it (nothing's ever easy lol)
originaljudolizard 1 year ago
lmfao people .OH MY GOD YOU CAN SEE THE DETONATIONS!!!. fuckin idiots if you knew anything about structures... its called when the building collapses there is so much pressure from the building falling its blows out the windows. if it was controlled demolition you would need a blast big enough to cut through steel AKA SEEING THE FUCKING EXPLOSION NOT DUST!!!!!!
XeXbanqz 1 year ago
From what I know, demolitions takes a few days for preparations, either they had the 100 FASTEST CREW in the world working together, or its been set to be demolished even before 9-11
WickeDiLLusionZ 1 year ago
@WickeDiLLusionZ The plans to take it down were build into the building from the very begining. What you want to look for is the demolition sceme for the WTC. No building in NYC can be build without one. There you will find all the answers if this demo sceme is not classified.
mwcdx 1 year ago
man you can see all the detonations going off! what a great video thanks for posting.
No thanks to Larry for pulling
harryramma 1 year ago
This is CGI (Computer Generated Images) Why is the building mostly white and not brow? Where did that gigantic smoke cloud come from? Of course no background is shown. The colour of the sky looks surprisingly real. Have a look at all the different colours of the sky in the live news broadcast and notice that there isn't any background anywhere. The TV footage is so obvious fake that it is ridiculous: watch?v=FcXdIlAK0e4
elbuggo 1 year ago
good god! jesus they did a great job! pull it!
jondevers 1 year ago
Note how it falls backwards at the end...and it's not even at the ground yet, there are still several stories to fall as you can see that the buildings blocking the view are several stories tall which you see at 0:18 when the camera pans out...
...this is why the side of the building is laying on top of the WTC7 rubble pile...and why Truther claims of a "straight down" collapse is false
CrazyRay7979 1 year ago
wow! look at the raging fires in wtc 7! no wonder it fell! too bad they dont show this on fox news. but like the zapruder film in re jfk's assassination it would be to educational as to what is really going on in this country.
vengencefrom1979 1 year ago
Hey man...there were gas tanks in the basement...that's why it fell. Great response. Almost genius level.
JFM135 1 year ago
This was definately a conspiracy! They have managed to keep a hush on WTC7 EVEN FALLING! I had no idea that 3 buildings "collapsed"... everyone always says it was only the first two! Shocking!
rossgardiner 1 year ago
INSIDE JOB!!!!!!
ama387 1 year ago
You can clearly see the fucking blowouts for Christs sake.
Hell, you can even see the high speed flash of an explosive charge.
You have to be a fucking moron to believe the fire theory.
TankerUSA 1 year ago
Controlled demolition so the guy who it owned it and the tin towers could claim all his millions.
katryn3 1 year ago
Look at 0:44 , there is a bright flash over the building. At first I thought it might be a window or some metal reflecting the sunlight. This is not the case, its an explosion that propells a burning object FAST to the right. Could this possibly be a shape charge detonating and the burning object be the metal surrounding the charge being propelled to the right?
roxxphatcox 1 year ago
no cables caused the windows to pop just before the building comes down. this IS demolition clearly. cables my ___ !
hikeitnow 1 year ago
you are fucking retard wtc 7 was not bomb a fire started in the bulding at 8.45am then wtc depre fell on top of it and the fire burned till 6.00 pm theres gas tanks in basment that why it fell at the beging of the base god LEARN YOUR FACTS
spainking1 1 year ago
@spainking1 Actually NIST reported that the damage from the collapses of the twin towers had no relation to the collapse of World Trade Center 7....oh and btw at first they tried to play it off as gas tanks exploding but NIST as did earlier reports had to admit that there was no gas tank explosions. I think you may need to learn your facts.
pendragon3434 1 year ago
Great footage - haven't seen this one. Wow, that is even more obviously a controlled demoltion. There is even a couple of flashes visible, one in particular - about 5 floors from the top on right hand side at 0:04
louielovett 1 year ago
10 years,,,,,,,, hmmmmmm, and we're still waiting for the JFK files to be released. I give it another 75 years for a BIT of real information about 9/11 is "made public".
So when we're all 140 years old- we will know the truth, can't wait!!! yahoo! f@kin hypocrites
eric1love 2 years ago
That doesn't have to be the case, although most people in this country are so brainwashed by sports and other meaningless nonsense.
I like sports too but when shit like this is happening WE ALL have to demand answers and not just sit back and wait for answers.
Expose911Lies 2 years ago 2
John Farmer, senior council for the 9/11 commission is already admitting false testimony in the 9/11 commissions final report. As well the whole gold scandal under tower 5 is beginning to see light thanks to the no good economy. As well, in "The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Vol. 2" , Niels H. Harrit of the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, ........
BradfordJL 2 years ago
confirmed red-gray flakes found throughout multiple samples of WTC dust are actually unexploded fragments of nanothermite, an exotic high-tech explosive. So maybe sooner than we thought : )
BradfordJL 2 years ago
Its amazing how many cowards there are in America. All these people murdered... yet family members just sit back, acccept the 9/11 payoff money, and weep. Fukin beyotches..LOL!
wildcard21276969 2 years ago 10
@wildcard21276969 What were they supposed to do you asshole?
kellypaidforit 6 months ago
Same one at 0:04.
AlmightyJerk 2 years ago
0:39
A nice little white flash around the 4th or 5th floor from th top.
Thanks for posting.
AlmightyJerk 2 years ago 3
Clearly it was Al Qaeda trained squirrels that ate out the steel beams.
PresidenteCamacho 2 years ago 37
@PresidenteCamacho Not even Willy Wonka could train his squirrels to do that one.
MrDeppness 9 months ago
@PresidenteCamacho hahahaha
playuppompey01 7 months ago
amazing clip, you can see it clearly almost until it reaches the ground. No way localized fires on a few floors could have done that.
smitty121981 2 years ago
Anyone interested in the truth needs to see this video from Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.
*911 Blueprint for Truth - The Architecture for Destruction - With Richard Gage, AIA*
The events of 911 are not a Liberal versus Conservative issue, and they're not a political issue, they are in fact a criminal issue. All three towers were brought down by controlled demolition.
The world is waking up to this fact.
KevinMerck 2 years ago 4
huh haven't seen that one before, thanks..
wearechangenorwich 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you liked this video and are interested in learning alot more then please check out my channel, there is lots of full videos on there as well as videos in parts right now and hundreds of related videos in my playlists and im adding more and more all the time. We need to stick together as youtube continues to shut down these channels and videos, so please subscribe or add me as a friend... THANKS TO EVERYONE WHO TAKES THE TIME TO CHECK OUT MY CHANNEL!
WakeUpPeopleToTruth 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out Open Source Ecology! youtube.*com/user/marcinose. Its bascially Zeitgeist At work please support it!
Gaia842 2 years ago
Fuck you and fuck the government this is bullshit! 911 was a fucking inside fucking job!! i have had enuff of this fucking bullshit, this is it, this is the last fuckin chance, if we do nothing on 9/11/09 then the fucking war is over, there will be hell to pay on 9/11/09 this is our last fucking chance or we are done! god bless please help us....
tonydayna 2 years ago
Why 9/11/09? Why not any chance we get?
sjr4life 2 years ago
tonydayna: be quiet man, do you want to end up in Quantanamo bay? and be tortured? are you fucking stupid? You can't talk like that about the government, they have the power to destroy you, me, and everyone else on this planet who doesn't agree with them. Just act like George Orwells character at the end of the novel, blend in and keep quiet and go with the flow. Welcome to the New World of the United Slaves of America.:)))
Csabika30NY 2 years ago
hehe <3
tonydayna 2 years ago
@tonydayna and to think its 9/20/2010 and the war is still going on. are you still as psycho as a year ago?
XeXbanqz 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Im bout to crash into you suckas like the world trade im riding clean escalade full of green grenades
neanam 2 years ago
It's so obviously a controlled demolition. The reason they wont happily admit that is because it takes weeks if not months of preperation to rig a building that size with thermite. Then they are forced to explain why they want to demolish a building the same day a so-called terrorist attack takes place. We all know the answer.
Jaoric 2 years ago 7
...And we are told fire weakened the "over-engineered" steel structure forcing it to collapse - a first in history. Those who believe this ought to look at the recent skyscraper fires that burned for days on end without collapse. Just youtube 'burning skyscraper doesn't collapse' - or something.
Jaoric 2 years ago 21
@Jaoric
There are many things incorrect with your statement.
One, many steel framed buildings have collapsed due to intense fires.
Two, that burning skyscraper you were talking about was engineered completely different. WTC7 was a tube within a tube. Meaning that the wide open floors went long distance (70') without being assisted by columns. Creating open office space but also vulnerabilities to cause the floors to sag.
usindependent50 10 months ago
@Jaoric
However that "Burning Skyscraper, or what I think is the unfinished Beijing Hotel, doesn't collapse because its steel trusses are much shorter and much stronger.
Ex.
Put two bricks 3' apart, put a 1/4" board over the bricks. Then put the bricks 1' apart. Which way do you think is sturdier?
usindependent50 10 months ago
anyone one knows if they planted explosives knows that it would be before hand
but from lookin from this video it looks like it just collapsed
doesnt look like a CD
wesia4lia 2 years ago
indeed, and they will say when they have no choice that they took down wtc1 and 2 for reasons of safety and kept it quiet, although that time may never come, it never came for JFK.
aspectusTV 2 years ago
hm, bin laden did it, but I don't know how
illuminatislut 3 years ago
Well that should do it, i think if you have seen this video you should be able to safely say that this building was demolished, if anyone thinks otherwise i would like to hear your explanation of why this building fell.
drgrcr00 3 years ago
Controlled demolition
1. 9/11
2. Iraq, Afghanistan
3. Martial law
Simaz12345 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
911 was an inside job.
dreadboycba 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
911 was an inside job
crinoid1918 3 years ago 4
wow! i didnt know demolition was so easy,all i need to do is set the building on fire! i will make millions!!!!
sn9696 3 years ago
Ok clearly there was fire in the building, but even more evident is the fact it was blown out of it by force of mgravity pulling the building down in near perfect speed. The smoke and the down current the sparks and embers that can be seen blowing out of the roof of the building and then falling down on top also at the same rate of speed as the building, free fall. Also please watch the new north tower video. It really brings it home to why 9/11 is so important, because this is TREASON! -think
mattn412 3 years ago
We all saw planes fly into the towers and the pentagon (the talk of a missle has to be sheer lunacy).That said, a discussion on whether the government planned the whole thing can perpetuate indefinitely because there is no proof to the contrary. There are also those who insist that there was more than one gunman who assasinated JFK and the government is hiding the captured UFO that crashed at Roswell. The fact that BinLaden and his cronies planned this whole thing remains the obvious...
TECHKLEC 3 years ago
...conclusion to me although I haven't been personally involved in his capture and can't answer to those with conflicting views. Perhaps Rex Tomb doesn't have all the information that he should? It's all speculation at this point.
TECHKLEC 3 years ago
I would love to see the plane that flew into the pentagon, since you say "we all saw it"...pass on the footage to back this up please..(message to Techklec)
shinendeeneadie 3 years ago
Look at the security video and talk to the witnesses. What about the aircraft wreck that was removed from the building? How about talking to the family members who lost loved ones? Are you delusional?
TECHKLEC 3 years ago
Hey, we know who is delusional here...show me the footage from the security video, you and EVERYONE ELSE have seen it so I just want the link to see it too. Simmer down now!
shinendeeneadie 3 years ago
Simmer down? I'm cool...I have a clip that I will send you but i just got done sending a few out and I'm getting the red "Please Wait" flag right now.
TECHKLEC 3 years ago
TECHKLEC , stop wining about the family members that died and blah blah blah..ass! What do you want to make clear with your stupid remark anyway then?? Please explain.
Syphonaptera 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sorry, Syph..., but Iv'e got nothing to explain to you muslim terrorists. Just stay in your cave, take a bath and shave.
TECHKLEC 3 years ago
TECHKLEC , ok , once again then: What do you want to make clear with your stupid remark anyway then?? Please explain!! You being a Vietnam veteran(you claim to be one) should know better, you overpatriotic brainwashed imbecile.You murdered children and women, when you die a lot of souls will finally get some rest, you disgusting piece of terrorism.
Look at you ...just look at you.....you ass.
Syphonaptera 3 years ago 2
TECHKLEC , if a wise man points to the moon , you stare at his finger. Snap out of your fable dimension buddy, it will help your silly life.
Syphonaptera 3 years ago
That is news to me. While I presently live in Virginia, I am originally from the NYC area and was in the general vicinity when the attack took place. There are two people that I personally knew who perished along with three families of two others whom I did not know directly and all of the families that I know are satisfied with the knowledge that the actual "culprits" got killed in executing their deeds while the "leader of the pack" is still on the lam.
TECHKLEC 3 years ago
Whoa...thats news to you? Do you live in a cave?
shinendeeneadie 3 years ago
What "news" are you referring to? If your'e just trying to start slinging bullshit, Iv'e got better things to do.
TECHKLEC 3 years ago
TECHKLEC , I know some Vietnamese, there grand fathers and grandmothers were stabbed to death with american baynonets, between the dying body and the knive the yanks did stick a pokercard with a message on it. Give me your adress so their grand children can visit YOU to make clear what they feel.Loser.
Syphonaptera 3 years ago
TECHKLEC , 19 radical jihadists? Dude, 40! And about 35 were from Saudi Arabia, go and bomb the fat Dollar Arabs, they are accountable for 9-11, NOT Afghanistan, NOT Iraq.
Syphonaptera 3 years ago
Part IV
Nearly every member of my family is military or ex-mil. I was going to join the Marines, but my wisdom, brain power, and willingness to take what I now realize was sage advice from a extremely highly-decorated vietnam veteran with whom I know took me on a different direction. Maybe you have not had this courtesy of blind luck in your life, nor horrible experiences I have had, but you are here and can hear now -- you can't claim ignorance.
LLCoolPass 3 years ago
Part III [damn it, it's our of order LOL]
You are fully willing to accept it. And this reminds people like "911infowarrior" of reactions had by those who were exposed to the Reichstag fire on the 27th of February, 1933.
I would not try to hurt people like you or the family members or anyone in general. I played solo trumpet for a special musical ceremony in memorance of those lost on 9/11 ten days later, in front of hundreds of people for your information.
LLCoolPass 3 years ago
Part I
Gee, Patriot Act, Disregarding Geneva convention, torture, invasion of Afghanistan. We can't get a simple and honest investigation of 9/11 first off all? I mean, without those like the website you defamed, we would have what to call facts ANYWAY?!?!
LLCoolPass 3 years ago
Part II
The basic problems is that you are fine when there is the possibility that the govt lied about reason to invade Iraq [leading to death of over 1 Million People, plus injured and plus future radiated and killed by unexploded munitions], but when it comes to their conclusion of 9/11 [which was biased and non-investigatory therein the reason why several prominent widows, children and other as well, of the deceased have demanded such]
LLCoolPass 3 years ago
the whole event is amazing
LLCoolPass 3 years ago
TECHKLEC is full of shit. "our government is too big and screwed up to sucessfully execute any kind of conspiracy" - yeah right!
There's no fool like an old fool.
9/11 was an inside job. Just like Oklahoma City bombing, or JFK, or 7/7 bombings. The only thing special about 9/11 is the body count.
tuzmor 3 years ago 3
tuzmor is probably a real nice kid but it's just too bad that he has his head stuck way up his ass.
TECHKLEC 3 years ago
There's really just too much information on this subject for me to sift through since I'm not trying to sell anybody on what I think...it's all too big to do anything about anyway. However, I do think that we could probably agree our government is too big and screwed up to sucessfully execute any kind of conspiracy while keeping it quiet. But, even if it did, more people than just me would be affected and Il'l just have to go with the flow while keeping things around me 'cocked and loaded'.
TECHKLEC 3 years ago
Bureaucracy you would say leaves no one to fall through the cracks then, too? And you definetely think that no group within government agencies could move towards a goal [in essence a conspiracy]? Tell that to Hitler, who was nearly blown to shreds by his own men. Tell that to kids who get molested by Catholic priests. Tell that to me after the abuse I experienced growing up from various different power structures, organizations and people. Tell yourself you've never conspired.
LLCoolPass 3 years ago
Your arguement is full of holes. Sure, there are real conspiracies, but to believe this event was planned by some secretive government agency is like believing in the tooth fairy.
TECHKLEC 3 years ago