Added: 4 years ago
From: LCVheatison
Views: 2,486
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I WAS RIGHT!

    watch?v=Ei_gq7Z8yX4

    

  • I'll say it again, as a Chemical engineer, I've come to understand chemical processes and environmental processes, nitrogen cycle, Carbon cycle..CO2 is never a pollutant and it is not causing any global warming. In fact, we are now experiencing the coolest winter around the world. These idiot politicians like Al Gore and Obama are picking this up to make money out of CO2 control. CO2 is necessary for plants to survive in the photosynthesis cycle, producing oxygen.

  • The United Nations is picking up on the CO2 emissions Kyoto protocol, and claimed the US needs to pay them over billions. Why is America turning stupid now???

  • America turned stupid 8 years ago when people like you elected George Bush and four years later elected him again. I spent the last 8 years trying to fathom how people in my beloved country could elect such an evil and stupid man and follow him like sheep as though he would lead you to the promised land. You are just mad that America has woken up and elected a real leader. Now you have to live in reality again and you don't sound happy. Kick and scream all you want but America is smarting up.

  • A1BROS- I think its interesting, that polar bears arent even REALLY drowning, they are being killed mainly by inuits, who claim its they right. Polar bears ARE NOT REALLY DROWNING. The exact opposite is abortion, mothers are claiming its their right to terminate a pregnancy WHENEVER they feel like it. BABIES ARE DYING AT 8 months and even 9 MONTHS INTO A PREGNANCY!! These same people think "what if a girl is raped?!" These women arent raped, they just dont "feel" like they want a baby.

  • All babies should be aborted. Polar bears are more intelligent.

  • (continued) whether or not you respond to this, please reconsider your opinion, and the potential consequences of inaction.

  • "If you believed?" It's not about believing, it's about realzing that it's a real possibility.

    You may not like to hear this, but in real life, we don't always have the option of being absolutely certian about threats before we act; sometimes we must act on incomplete knowledge.

    With as many scientists as there are(who know a whole lot more than you or I about climate science), are you really certian that it isn't real? If so, perhaps you should question your sources and their motives.

  • I agree with you about the babies. I hate voting for people who are pro-choice. But climate change is a real issue that affects more than just polar bears. If you really care about those babies, maybe you should consider what type of planet they'll be inheriting.

  • NASA says the Martian South Poles ice cap has been shrinking for three summers in a row. Maybe Mars got its fever from earth. If so, I guess Jupiters caught the same cold, because its warming up too, like Pluto.I wonder what all those planets, dwarf planets and moons in our SOLAR system have in common. Hmmmm. SOLAR system. Hmmmm. Solar? I wonder. Nah, I guess we shouldnt even be talking about this. The science is absolutely decided. Theres a consensus.

  • Okay, other planets are warming. For the last three summers? That doesn't prove anything. No one denies that the sun has an effect on temperature. I think it's sad that people like you are so quick to pass judgement on something without really studying it more.

    We could go back and forth with evidence all day, but my point is still the same. You are an individual who has no scientific backround(most likely)and you've decided that you don't think this threat is real. Case(and mind)closed.

  • "Case(and mind)closed." by killingthyme

    You are such a hypocrit its unbeleivable. Do you really think that there is a consensus on man-made global warming? HAHAHAHAH oh, oh, "reconsider your opinion, and the potential consequences" Do you have ANY idea what the consequences of acting will be? How about taxes, regulations, restrictions, financial destitution, stagnated economy, N.W.O. global communism, starvation, famine on and on. You sir are an asshole, gaping for the government.

  • First, I wasn't arguing that there was a consensus, only that many good scientists are concerned about man-made global warming, and that you should be too.

    Second, you sound like a nut-job conspiracy theorist. New World Order, global communism, starvation, famine? Tell me, is there a "consensus" on any of that, Mr. Genious? You are obviously not capable of rational thought.

  • Obama is currently being sued for FRAUD by the disrict attorney Philip Berg Philidelphia He claims he has audio of Obamas Kenyan Grandmother saying she witnessed him being born in Kenya.He cant produce a legitamate birth certificate. OR, his college transcripts. These college transcripts are believed to show he registed a forien national in order to recieve foriegn aid to pay for college.Born august 4 1961, registered in Hawii on august 8th. The Constitution say he MUST be born on american soil.

  • 1: I'm almost afraid to ask what your sources of information are. You think he could run for president without the mainstream media getting wind of this? (let me guess, the media is part of this NWO commie conspiracy)

    2: What does this have to do with Global Warming?

  • Obamas October suprize, watch it.

    LiEs, LIES, LIIEEES. idiot.

  • Killingthyme, Obama's source is Al Gore and he is a stupid president elect.

  • killingthyme, there is now a group of scientists such as Geophysicists, Geologists, Astronomists etc..contradicted the claim about global warming and climate change hoax. Climate was never constant anywhere, why did they say including stupid Obama that there is global warming and climate change. In fact, there is global cooling now and it is a cycle. Their study was flawed and is based on mathematical scenarios/prediction. Politicians picked up on this to make money on the public.

  • No one ever said that climate was constant.

    There have been numerous studies, and we could each cite scientists--and studies--all day.

    Which is the more acceptable risk? The risk of taking action, or of not taking action?

    Are you just as skeptical of an economic doomsayer who warns against taking action, as you are of an environmental one? Or do you just look for information that supports what you want to believe?

  • Funny how they are geophysicists, geologists, astronomers, etc. but no climatologists, as in people who study climate. It doesn't matter whether they got 20 Ph.Ds in every science. A denier is a denier. Simple as that. Obama said it best. Lipstick on a pig, it is still a pig.

    BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOYAAAAAAAA­AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH­HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!

  • There is no man made global warming, it is a made up story, a hoax, a mathematical scenario created by mad scientists and these does not include others variables such as sun's activity. CO2 does not cause global warming ...only nutjobs believe this. This is a HOAX. CO2 is a basic component of the atmosphere necessary for life of plants.

  • There are several respected scientific organizations and scientists saying CO2 does cause global warming. No one denies the sun affects climate.

    CO2 is a basic component necesarry for life? No, really? I guess that means it doesn't trap heat like the scientists say.

    You still haven't answered my questions. Which is the more acceptable risk? How can you be so certian that you are right, given the high stakes? Why aren't you as skeptical of the economic doomsayers?

  • To learn more about WORLDBANK plans/Climate Change = google search YouTube video :

    "PROTEST-Indigenous Peoples "2nd MAY REVOLT" at the UN"

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more