Added: 4 years ago
From: LavaRed1
Views: 175,263
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (270)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If there was a king tiger on the battel the battel was won

  • @giuseppeRraimondo - Not so. The King Tiger was actually a Whimpy Tiger, as most of them broke down without ever seeing combat. Tank video games aren't exactly historically accurate.

  • @JohnQuincyAdams1 i know that this tank was MOST of the times a fail. But if they got this tank to work for a battle it would be really hard for the enemy to get it down

  • @giuseppeRraimondo - That's when the fighter bombers were called in and they'd make swift work of such a sitting target. The Allies had virtually complete control of the skies in Europe. Nazi Germany stood a snowball's chance in hell of winning WWII.

  • A sweet piece of metal, even if it was pretty impractical in real battlefield conditions.

  • @deino117 - "A sweet piece of metal", doesn't frequently break down, like this piece of junk King Tiger did.

  • Эх чутка не успели ИС-3, чтоб записать на свой счет по пяточку таких

  • @kukumberman

    IS-3 would lose to Konigstiger, just as IS-2

  • still the scariest meanest looking tank ever I think.

  • @Gonzoidzz Did you know that it's a bit wider and taller than the M1 Abrams?

  • @Gonzoidzz that one plus is-2 and t-72:P

  • Beast tank

  • Too bad it lacked sound. Well whatever!

  • Greetings everyone! My name is Tim and I am an historian. I have just published a book all about the Battle of the Bulge. The title is: THE ARDENNES ON FIRE: VOLUME ONE. It provides the reader with extensive background info on the immense German military buildup just prior to launching their grand counter offensive. Then, I cover every aspect of day one of the great German assault. My book contains 101 photos and many fine maps. You can get it through Amazon.com and Barnes and Noble. It's great

  • @SWALE1984 We historians are a rare breed.I applaud you and your book.

    I will take a look and maybe buy it.

    I have extensive collection of WWII books, right now i am reading the WAFFEN SS role on both fronts, from british military authors they are good not biased like GLANTZ for example(extremely biased and uninformative, almost soviet propaganda).

    Youtube sometimes get some serious people. I love Youtube, undecided to buy IPAD or new SAMSUNG GALAXY S(i have the phone )tough decision.

  • @MrBobe9 Thank you very much for your kind comments! Yes, indeed, we historians are a rare breed. I sincerely hope that you do purchase my book to add to your great collection. Thanks again!

  • germany once before hitler tried to conquer russia and failed due to the winter. russia beat germany's hitler due to loads of numbers and sacrifice. sacrifice on a level that is just not understood these days. they also won because the allies help. they would have done it without them in the end but, remeber russia lost more men in WW2 in combat than the rest of the world combined. thats sacrifice. do you call that winning though?

  • @0Zolrender0

    I can't remember if I am thinking of the right war, but didn't the Russian Officers used to sit back from the battle with a machine gun to kill all retreating soldiers?

    That was harsh.

  • @0Awildgoose yes in WW2 russian soldiers that retreated or refused to fight were shot on the spot by their officers. usually with a pistol though. machine guns were in short supply.

  • @0Awildgoose You are confusing Red Army officers with Komsomol and NKVD regiments. Those both used to stablish rear lines behind the frontline to "fight the coward".

    Also some regular officers and soldiers would shoot their own comrades if they saw them retreating without orders. Most of them just to avoid being the target of the NKVD themselves.

  • the russian had alone never a chance radiantrey you little bitch

  • All White people are superior to niggers.

  • @PanzerkommandantSS All of us come from so called black people.

  • @327pir If you want to be exact... we all come from mud...^^

    but yeah, its right whoever thinks he is more werth coz of he is white.. I just can say: poor guy... doesn't know who he is....

    or as I say: we all bleed red... Kings and queens shal bleed blueXD never tested... ask the guys from K... they sind "god save the bit**...sry... queen"

    And that in a time of so caled " democracy"XD

  • RUSSIANS KICKED GERMAN ASSES ANYWAY AND SCREWED ALL GERMAN WOMEN - MODERN GERMANS ARE HALF RUSSIANS!

  • @radiantrey

    all? only a lil bit of the eastern germany. learn about history before write comments. and germany was won against russia before. so russians are also half germans.

  • @Schmitti1982 of course.)

  • @ Echeque5 hahaha tiger tanks are racist xD

    hitler wanted more lebensraum for his people, more natural resources,... so his people could survive on their own without depending on other countries, he didn't invade half of europe just to kill every bloody human living in it. read some books please

  • Isn't it fucking stupid for having a video of a load of king Tiger tanks and yet everyones talking about racism?

  • Ha your comment is completely pathetic.

    How is a heavy tank saposed to be racist dumbass?

  • Actually they built this to destroy allied tanks, they didn't build a machine to be racist to people.

    Why the fuck would they build such a magnificent machine to be racist, 2nd of all how???

    "Oh we are going the build a heavy tiger tank to be racist and evil", where the fuck do you learn your History, Disney channel?

  • @jimmyxx3 lol @Disney Channel

  • @jimmyxx3 there are alot of brainwashed pc morons on here man. cant even look at a historic video of a tank without dealing with it

  • @SSBlackAngel

    Hahaha i totally agree, i mean it's just a few King Tiger tanks and I've heave idiots call it a "symbol of racist", unbelievable.

  • @Echeque5 After 65 years, they still dont get it.

  • @jimmyxx3 so true, this video or tank has nothing got to do with racism or Nazis. but this guy "Echeque5" hates Germany and all people who live there. He is actually the only real racist commenting on this video. And he is very pathetic as well, you're totally correct!

    He still lives in the past and thinks the "EVIL NAZI GERMANY" is still ruling the world and all Germans are Nazis and Hitler is still alive lol.

    What a dumb dick he is haha.

    btw nice video and the King Tiger rules too!!!

  • @tanker1408 Angela Merkel is worse than Hitler. I like Germans but it´s still best that they feel guilt. People who will do anything the leader they admire wants them to are dangerous. What if some charismatic Muslim leader would convince Germans of his cause.

  • @tanker1408 Germans are not a race

  • how old are you and where are you come from?

  • Tanks made of steel do not have political or racial opinions. Neither did many of those who served in their crews. The Sherman did not "exemplify" everything about christianity, and the T-34 did not exemplify everything about marxism.

    The attempt to link tanks with racism is just a cheap attempt to make admiring this steel beast somehow racist. Futile attempt. And by linking a pile of steel with racism you degrade the word racism, and degrade those who have actually been affected by racism.

  • @ aaKonda, here here! Well put sir. Machines don't share the prejudice's of their makers. A machine will work for whomever is operating it and for whatever cause or reason.

  • Echeque5, i just wanted to tell you that your 'online translator german' does not impress me.

  • @Ixtzalit - I just wanted to tell you that I think you are extremely childish and your conduct doesn't impress me or anyone. Have a nice day!

  • Your arguments are fantastic^^.

  • @Ixtzalit - Your childishness is unique.

  • Yeah lets be racist.

    aaxel03 fuck your weak country Romania, everyone there is just like you a load of dick heads.

    Oh sorry about that, I'm just having abit of "freedom" as you call it.

  • yeah realy everyone has the right to epress there opionin and think wat they want so everyone should just calm down

  • @white14estonia - Son, if you're really 21 years old, you are behaving as a 10 year old. Grow up.

  • you called him a nigger... A slav has the nerve to make fun of anyones race...what has the world come to no go back to fucking your mother or sister and leave the internet to the higer orders. Hitler really fucked up, leaving so many of you monkeys in the USSR alive.

  • @white14estonia - You SAID you were a racist, which means by definition you are also an idiot. :)

  • @white14estonia - Son, I truly feel sorry for anyone that has so much bitter hatred and evil in their heart. However, harassment is against YouTube Terms of Service. Fact is, YOU ADMITTED YOU ARE A RACIST.

  • ha ha! never met anybody from a country so happy to get ass-fucked by hitler. Guess that makes you a "bottom," shithead.

  • Comment removed

  • It really pains me when people make statements like they do about the KT. A piece of Junk it certainly was not...

    Less then 400 were ever built to few to have made any sort of impact on the war at this late stage.

    I think it would have been alot wiser to make more Panthers, but this wouldn't have helped either the Allies had alot more tanks then the German's could ever have amassed.

    The KT was a hell of a Tank but so what it hopelessly out numbered!!

  • @seanbl1 - A tank that is broken down more than it is in service, as history has documented, is indeed a piece of junk. Even Hitler expressed his deep disappointment with this tank.

  • And Hitler did not criticize the King Tiger. Actually, it was one of his favorites, he loved this tank. learn history dude.

  • @xNexus65x - "Dude", I am a historian and have been studying WWII for the past 40 years of my life. On the learning scale curve, you are years and years behind me. :)

  • @Echeque5 Shut up faggot, spare me this shit, i don't want to waste my time with idiots like you. and don't ever reply to my comments again because i don't care about that you have no life.

  • @xNexus65x - I'm sorry if you are having a hiss-fit over your lack of correct historical information, but that's no one's fault but your own. Don't be so silly as to even suggest telling other people what to do. We don't need your permission. Have a nice day. :)

  • How did they ever lose?

  • @thegafferlives - Because they started a war they couldn't win and this tank in particular was a mechanical piece of junk with most of them not even seeing combat because they were broken down.

  • I think "piece of junk" is a tad harsh. The initial faults were corrected. Plus the Nazis HAD won the war prior to the invasion of Russia. It is widely excepted that the U,K, & U.S.A.

    could not defeat the Nazis were it not for the Russian "mistake".

    Im sure everyone agrees with me.

  • @thegafferlives - False. Nothing was corrected with this piece of junk because it's original concept was flawed. A too large tank using a too small engine, transmission steering gear that led to them being broken down more often that in service, is indeed junk. Nazi Germany couldn't ever even to come close to the industrial capacity of America and because of this they were doomed before they even started this insane, evil war.

  • Echeque5 - You are false. The King Tiger was the most feared tank by the enemies and according to german combat reports, it was one of the most effective tank killer of second Word War, that's a historical fact! end of discussion! shut up now.

  • @xNexus65x - Son, that isn't so. Silly nationalist pride doesn't change the facts. From the book, "Tigers in Combat", by Wolfgang Schneider, (another German person, but they don't suffer from silly nationalistic pride, changing historical facts), page 400, in reference to the King Tiger tank, "The tanks suffered numerous mechanical problems and saw little combat". Facts are stubborn things.

  • Even Wolfgang's book "Tigers in Combat" doesn't change the fact that the King Tiger was the most successfully tank to see combat in WW2. Yes, many were abandoned due to mechanical breakdowns, that is the simply truth.

    But that is the exact reason, whiy the King Tiger is credited to have the best kill-to-loss ratio of all time, because only a few saw combat but they killed thousands of enemy AFVs and tanks on both fronts! (mostly on the eastern front in Hungary)

  • @xNexus65x - With the worst mechanical reliability track record of any tank in WWII, (and possibly of any tank in history), it certainly was not, "the most successful tank to see combat in WWII". Heck, most of them didn't even see any combat as they were broken down so much.

  • @thegafferlives - Son, invading Russia wasn't a, "mistake". Nazi Germany was trying to get to the Russian oil fields and if they had, the war might have gone of for years longer. If you will read the history books, you will find that after the Normandy invasion of D-Day, the German army was pushed all the way back to Berlin, Germany in about a year. It was a continual process of retreat. Erwin Rommel himself, (the desert fox), stated that if the allies landed in Europe, Germany would lose.

  • Rommel was referring to the second front. Without the russian campaign there would be no second front therefore D-day would not have been possible. The number of german troops available as a result would have seen to that.

  • @thegafferlives - If that scenario had occurred, don't you think the allies would have taken that into account and also used the required necessary military force to ensure victory? Evil Nazi Germany couldn't have won WWII under any circumstances as they didn't have the necessary industrial might to sustain and win WWII.

  • germany and usssr were allyes. russia wanted to attack germany but germans knew that and attacked first.

  • @Echeque5 they didnt start the war..this is jewish bullshit. they were forced to fight.

  • The KT had the highest kill ratio of any tank of WW11

    A "piece of junk" it certainly was not sir.

    It had its problems like any new ground breaking technology, but these niggles were corrected.

    If it was not for the Russian campaign Nazi Germany would have won WW11 comfortably.

    Im sure everyone here agrees with me.

  • @thegafferlives - Sir, a tank that spends most of its time broken down with engine, transmission and steering gear failures, along with dangerous fuel leaks, most certainly can be aptly categorized as a piece of junk. Even Hitler was deeply dissappointed in this thing.

  • I hardly think Hitler had disappointment issues over a tank engine. Hitler was disappointed for the KT's performance in the Ardennes Offensive which this huge tank was not designed for. Narrow roads and thick heavy forests were not an ideal location for this beast. The KT preformed much better on the Russian front and a famous battle outside Berlin in which a handful of KT's held back hordes of T34/85's and JS2's until they were overrun by sheer numbers.

  • @seanbl1 *thumbs up*! ;)

  • Thank you :)

  • @white14estonia - Son, if you even do a cursory reading of WWII history books, you will find that Nazi Germany did indeed start WWII in Europe.

  • 1) im not your son. 2) poland provoked war.

    it was england who declared war against germany when germany attacked poland. and why didnt england declared war against soviet union? they attacked polend from the east.

    winners write the official history.

  • @white14estonia - Son, you are clearly very young so the term, "son", applies. Now you are attempting to say that the evil Nazi Germany were the ones that were attacked? WOW. lol Son, A-N-Y-O-N-E can write a history book. You are using an old, invalid qluiche.

  • @white14estonia - Why is it bad for MILLIONS of INNOCENT PEOPLE to be EXTERMINATED?! Why is it BAD to practice RACISM, HATRED, MURDER and EVIL? If you have to ask that question....wow. You might be best to see a psychiatrist. It's people like you and lxtzalit that WORSHIP the EVIL of Nazi Germany that encourage me to stay in these forums and point out your insane hypocrisy.

  • @Echeque5 i knew you start with that holohoax BS. there were no such thing as holocaust. its fake. truth defends it itself and if such great crime really took place then why jews use fake fotos and false propaganda to protect that myth? they put people to jail who shows FAKTS that proves holocaust is fake. anyone cant write history book like you said but OFFICIAL history is written by those people who won the war. and racism? give me a brake.. there were no coloured people in europe that time.

  • @white14estonia - You sire are a delusional RACIST. There are THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of eye witness accounts of the MASSIVE GENOCIDE that EVIL NAZI Germany committed! The evidence is OVERWHELMING...to anyone with a BRAIN anyway! You sir/kid, have ZERO CREDIBILITY!

  • @white14estonia <-- RACIST. Their heart is full of bitter hatred and evil. NO CREDIBILITY. GAME OVER.

  • @white14estonia <--- AMAZING that so MUCH bitter hatred, RACISM and EVIL could be in the heart of merely a 21 year old! Game over. They've lost ANY credibility they had.

  • @white14estonia <--- Bitter, hate filled, racist. Tis a sad thing to see the mind/heart of someone contaminated like this, especially at such a tender young age as 21!

  • @white14estonia - You are TOTAL NIT WIT to even SUGGEST that the holocaust was fake. On top of that, that is an EXTREMELY RACIST thing to even SUGGEST! You are either a TOTAL MORON or are on DRUGS, or both! You have ZERO CREDIBILITY. Buzz off. You're done. Game over. You LOST.

  • @white14estonia <-- Racist, foul mouthed KID! ZERO CREDIBILITY! Game over!

  • @white14estonia <--- Little RACIST KID. Game over. NO CREDIBILITY.

  • @white14estonia <--- RACIST, CHILD. lol lol lol OWNED! lol FOREVER LOST any credibility they HAD! lol lol lol

  • @white14estonia <--- A RACIST! NO CREDIBILITY!

  • @white14estonia <-- Evil, racist kid! ZERO CREDIBILITY.

  • @white14estonia <--- RACIST. NO CREDIBILITY. NO BRAIN.

  • There was 99th Aerial Pursuit, 332th Fighter, 92nd Inf Div, 24,25th InF Reg, 9,10 Cav Mech, 761 Armor to name a few predominantly black units

  • wow ';-)

  • Henschel turret???

  • Yes, you can identify them by the Boxed shaped and the Spare tracks in the Turrent. By that Time a Porsche Model would be incredibly Rare.

    the Henschel is know as ''The Production Turret''

  • Thanks for your information,I appreciate that.

  • no tiger 1's where involved, or very very very few.

    And Hitler digged his own grave for his own built empire. The vast amount of Resources spended in Tiger II, Jagdtigers where enourmous.If those where used in the Production in Panzer IV or Panthers, it would have stalled the war much longer

  • Good comment. Also maybe If they'd just built Panzer4 and stug3 and no heavies at all there whole Panzer force would have been far bigger in 1943 already and they might have had the numbers to actually stop the T-34. The Panzer4 with a long barelled 75mm was more than capable of destroying the T-34 armed with medium velocity 76.2mm. The German heavy tanks took so much resources for so few actual vehicles (and unreliable) that they probably shortened the war a lot. God bless the heavy tanks!

  • I think there were very few or even no Tiger 1 at the bulge but there were lots of tiger 2.

  • More were invovled in this engagement than at anytime on the Wwstern front.

  • BTW Tommy Atkins is the best soldier of all time!

  • You mean that guy who claimes to kill Micheal Wittman? sorry it wasen't him. The Candian Yoemanries (sp) took out the Black Baron. It is easy to claim who took out that man, Fact is that The Entry hole of the Tiger was on the Lower left side near the engine. The Brittish were on the ride side of Wittman, it wasn't Atkins. German official SS documents prove that.

  • NO idiot. Tommy Atkins is a mythical figure who represents all British soldiers. You young dummy

  • How the F*** should i know?! I'm German. and i aint Youmg, I'm 29

  • Ich bin 85 Jahre alt. Sie sind nur ein Junge. Leben und lernen Sie aus Ihren Ältesten, bevor Sie sprechen

  • So you're saying that you are 85 years old? okay. but then, you sir, must be having some expeirience with these Computers. or does your Grand Some manege these? ''life and Learn from you elders, before you speak' what do you mean by that? My GrandFather told me Everything what he did in the War, so i learn allot.

  • To be honest Iearned nand IBM3100 doing main fraome programming in 1960. I used Haleureutht cards. I purchased PC Last year. They are very simple enough. Listen to all your elders, to get a complete picture. Not all of us had the same experience. I have a black friend who flew figher aircraft and shot down a Me-262.

  • I have heard of that Unit. They flew in P-51's with Red tail did they? the other Black unit was the 767 Tank Unit of Gen. Patton'

  • @ThePanzerWarMachine - 29 is indeed young. Do you have gray hair? Wrinkles? Probably not. You're young.

  • @Echeque5 Hahahehehe Yeah, Thankfully, I have NON of the Above Listed! LOL

  • Really? 501 SS Heavy Pz and 506 Heavy Pz were both equipped with Tiger II. There was also some Tiger 1 equipments with 9 Pz Div from a FunkLenk (sp?) battalion. Easily verifiable - see Danny Parker for starters.

  • Then what are We looking at then?

    Mickey Mouse?

  • How can cm be smaller if 10 mm is 1 cm?

  • Same thing 88 mm = 8.8 cm

  • The king tiger was too big for city fighting are in close fighting, small roads and week bridges. The king tiger had not had the bugs worked out so it was a joke with many German solders on its poor mechanical record. I believe little over 1,000 were made for the Germans.

    It was a waste of money Hitler should have produce tanks that had a proven track record in the German army.

  • kcfusiongurl you don't know, you only believe. lol. exact there were only 480 pieces of the King Tiger produced during WW2. however most of them had mechanical failure, nearly about 70% of all KTs were were disabled and abandoned because of breakdowns. there were only about 80 operatinal King Tigers on the west and eastern front which served in the 503rd, 502nd, 501st, 101, 102, 103 Heavy tank battalions. they were very successfully, killing nearly 5000 enemy tanks and lost only 480 Tigers.

  • 490-492

  • Germans produced 490-492 Tiger II tanks.Tiger II was a good tank but as you mentioned it wasnt good in the cities- too slow and too big.But it was a heavy armored weapon that could be used as a shield.Panther would be a better investement and German generals knew it but Hitler couldt accept it.Hitler was a very bad militarist

  • Tank in the cities are vulnerable exposing weak side, rear and top armor to enemy fire. Every WW2 tank without exception is a bad choice for urban warfare specially if the enemy is well organized.

  • That is correct especialy in the king Tigers case it was sometimes to big to even to go into towns. Also during the battle of Berlin Soviet Tanks were pick off from hand held anti tank weapons and were easy targets because they were not able to manuver as well in the streets.

  • Most late WW2 tanks made by Germany was mostly designd for open area combat since they where equipt with the 8.8 cm FlaK cannon.

  • Ardennenschlacht, Panzer der Waffen SS, wahrscheinlich die Kampfgruppe Peiper!

  • Tiger II-s of the Schwere SS-Panzer-Abteilung 501.

  • I've always been of the opinion that had Hitler not been a psychopathic murderer and just said all Germans are equal and superior to all other nationalities we would still see the red,white and black flying all over Deutchland.

  • If he had, the Germans would have the nuke(with the Jewish and conventional thinking German scientists forced from Germany to the USA to create USA's nuke) and half of Russia would have been sympathetic to the Nazi's as they wouldn't have rounded up and killed hundreds of people, the second day from when they liberated these bordering Russian areas and Poland. That means some slav support as the Russian killed thousands of jews and other people on their conquered half of poland.

  • This is from Adrennes 1945 where 151 King Tigers were used. Only 20 were destroyed there and 10 of them from allied aircraft, 2 from Bazookas in very close combat and rest from technical defekts. No one lost by allied tanks! So if you were a allied infantryman and see a Tiger II, you better run from yourlife. There is almost nothing you can do (despite very short range but germans had always infanztry in the near of the tanks so its very idffuclt.

  • Wrong. Veterans say that some panzer never left the assembly area due to maintenance problems. Individual tanks positively documented as having participated in the Ardennes Offensive total 21. Of these 13 have been documented as destroyed in combat and 7 abandoned virtually intact. One is in the Patton Museum and three at the Army Ordinance Museum with one on display, One is on display in Belgium. None fell to Allied Aircraft.(From "Tigers in the Ardenne" and the dairy of Werner Wendt)

  • That tanks is the size of an average house! Huge! But I like Tiger I bettern than Tiger II...

  • German tanks are overpraisedand overrated. Tigers and Panthers were tens times more expensive to build than the all superior T-34. "King Tiger" was several times more expensive than IS-2, and that was the heaviest tank of the war! Weaponary needs to be efficient, simplified and reliable, the statistics come later. And this the Russians do best.

  • Well, Russian tanks were cheap, reliable, and easy to use. But cramped, robust, and their strength was more in numbers than in strengh of a tank. Panzer IV was cheap, relable and easy for maintanance. But Hitler was a madman, and always requested something big and new...wich overstreched whole Germany. Well, we're both luck that he was like that :D

  • First of all, the T-34 or any sort of Russian tank had/has all-around capabiltiy, in both firepower, protection, reliability, speed, etc. Numbers had nothing to do with how an individual tank operated.

  • It's armour protection was some 45mm (or more, I don't remeber right now). But, if you take a look at kill ratio, every German tank destroyed scores of Russian tanks before being destroyed. If numbers of Russian and German tanks were equal, Russian tanks would all be destroyed...

  • Different variations. Germans tended to build more heavy tanks than any other class, and T-34 is not a heavy tank. Put an IS-2/3 with any Tiger/Panther, the Germans would be all destroyed.

  • Many IS tanks were destroyed in action as well. And tank isn't worth a thing, if it's crew has rudimentary training, often below basic instructions. Red Army tankists had such training. Averagley, a week of training was considered enough by instructors. Many tanks missed what could be a 100% hit.. Mistakes in driving these tanks were also common, so many tanks were stuck in various diches, ponds, rivers, etc...

  • the best army in the battle of the bulge was the

    6.ϟϟ-Panzeramee...

  • Comment removed

  • SOMEBODY'S gay!!

  • The Tiger Tank 2 had extremely heavy armor and firepower. It was perfect for defence. It's only problem was it's considerably slow speed due to it's enormous weight (turret=70metrictonnes).

    The Russians generally did practically win the war considering they spammed t-34s which were superior to panzer 4s (not Tigers) in thousands over a huge front that made it impossible for the Germans to defend. The British and Americans would have been wiped out if Russia did not enter the war.

  • Are you kidding me with that.

  • Not really. No!

  • Yes, really Yes.

  • That was supposed to attach as a reply to an earlier comment but youtube put it after your andJSLegoMaster's comment. Sorry!

  • This Tank wasnt that good at all! It had engine problem cause the engine was to small to drive such a heavy tank.

  • haha XD

  • The pictures are not made in Tonsdorf but in Honsfeld on 17-12-1944. It are pictures of the spearhead of Kampfgruppe Peiper.