@TheCasao86: I cannot dislike people personally because I dont know every one of them individually BUT like I said in this vid, its the situation that I dislike because society has been socially engineered this way and it causes clashes in society with culture among other things so its rediculous how Britain has ended up like this.
"I'm not a racist, I'm colonial-separatist, get it right". Yet, later on in the video ( 4:39)… "Mixing races is fucking disgusting, it's wrong and it shouldn't happen". Yeah, not racist at all ;)
BTW, United Kingdom wasn't always united. People who came to the British Isles were split into small, antagonistic tribes with a limited influence. If you believe that people should live where their ancestors did, you shouldn't travel at all. You should sit in your county for your whole life.
The distinction is that those tribal peoples had to be extremely resiliant and pioneering - from the post-ice-age people who colonised the most extreme edges of their world to the Celts, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Scandinavians and Normans who had to fight tooth and nail to get into Britain.
You can hardly draw a comparison with a bunch of grinning middle-aged Afghanis who creep out of a lorry in Dover claiming that they're 15 years old and that they've conveniently lost their passport.
Thanks for not screaming fuck at me like I expected you to do the whole time...I'll respond later today. And post it as a response next time so I can see it!!
The fact that you were born in a certain place, doesn't make it yours. You may not like people coming to the UK, but luckily it's not up to you to decide. You didn't colonize this place and you don't own it. If you want to keep certain people out of your comfort zone, fine, but that right ends where your property ends.
Don't act like you conquered the land and it's yours now. It is not.
@Crazayblasiangirl: so let me get this straight. You inbox me with a bunch of abusive messages, comment on my video's about how Im a fool and how I'm a dumb ass nd you call me a troll. Girl, I am open for a civil debate here but youre pushing your luck. If you dont stop trolling MY video's then I will block you. Buck your idea's up. Youve already messaged my inbox with sexually dirogitory remarks but it doesnt really matter about that because I can read and delete. These comments are public!
@halycyon1234: Give me examples and I'll give you my answer for each. I cant put all of them in the same category...some countrys have been colonised by Europeans and some have just emigrated to other countrys that already have been colonised by other tribes people.
@halycyon1234 Yes, whites went to entire continenets and introduced education, technology and infrastructure. Once those benefits were established, the indigenous peoples told the whites to bugger off. Predictably, it all then turned to shit. Now they have their hands out to us for cash to support their broken, corrupt societies.
@herringfly yeah & u forgot 2 mention U all brought TONS of DISEASES, KILLED many ppl, are THIEVES (thy shall NOT STEAL!) who STOLE this land, POLLUTION, yada yada! ADMIT your WRONG doings & STOP being so SELF-RIGHTEOUS!
& btw, the Natives were EDUCATED BEFORE u CUNTS got here, just not according to YALL STUPID STANDARDS!!!! They actually used WISDOM! U STUPID INVADERS who have F'D up POLITICS!!! And there is NO universal definition of civilization so "SAVAGE" is the WRONG word 4 natives!
Mate, Ive experienced first hand what kind of mouth this so called young lady has and the filth that comes out of her mind. She sent me a lovely message earlier. I wont go to deep about what she said but if I say derogitory sexual comments, that should give you enough to assume her message. Shes just a self riteous little black girl who thinks because her ancestors were slaves, she can put the world to rights but shes not inherited a trauma from slavery 100's of years ago so she can piss off.
@Crazayblasiangirl If you mean the post ice-age hunter gatherers who came here 6-7 thousand years ago, and the Celts, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Scandinavians and Normans who fought their way into Britain, I think we deserve to stay here - unlike today's feckless economic migrants who abandon their families and creep out of a lorry in Dover looking for welfare benefits and a free ride. There is no comparison. Stick to American history.
@PandaIVIonium Thanks man. I know there is still a few people out there who understand where I'm coming from...some people (a minority) are unenchanted by this multiculturism, politically correct bullshit but the rest seem to just fall into line and accept it, and a lot of people even believe that its all normal now. Pisses me off.
.....yourself no favours by taking that stance. Why can't you be a nationalist and maintain an interest in other cultures that might have something to teach you, make you appreciate the diversity of life, or just plain bring some variety into your life? This is the area where you lose many people. Because so many nationalists seem to tie up their whole identity and sense of self in their race or nation with too much pride in whatever of these they had the luck to be born into.
It’s all too common for nationalists and anti immigration types to claim they are not hateful and then betray their claims when pressed further. You just claimed that and yet you immediately call someone a dirty race mixing bastard in the first comment I see (don’t care about your history with him) What if people of different races fall in love? If you oppose their love based on race then that is hateful pure and simple. And the other thing is the 'we don't wana know em' part. You do.......
@SpiralOut011 He's a DUMB ASS! He's prob. mixed w/ this & that so he can NOT be talking! It's RARE to not be mixed in this world! We ALL came from Adam & Eve anyways! When he says that sort of stuff, he is HATING his own ancestors! I bet he hates JESUS 2 who was a JEW! smh at this d.bag!
.......So do you understand to any extent people’s suspicion of nationalist movements as perhaps having racists involved? Almost every person who I've met who takes a strong anti immigration stance has claimed it's not because of racism but has also revealed their racism on other occasions. If that was not the case with you then I'd be sympathetic, but the first comment I see on here makes me suspect otherwise.
Well, you make some good points on the differences between racism and nationalism. And I can understand how frustrating it must be to be constantly accused of taking a position you don't. However, would you admit that nationalist movements in many countries have been plagued by actual racism in the past? Some of which would probably still find it hard to separate their real racists from their nationalists, and that nationalism is a very convenient escape route or cover for racists? ...continued
@wesleysonic: Kiss my hairy white arse you dirty race mixing bastard. Oh and you cant expect to not have consequences for trolling me. Youre blocked! Bye dipshit!
@wesleysonic If you don't beleive that people have a right to disagree with immigration then you not only disagree with freedom of speech, you disagree with freedom of thought. If our government thought like you we would live under a dictatorship!
You're having a LAUGH! It was not primitive times, it was less than a century ago! It had completely nothing to do with survival, Britain was not dying of hunger, it was rich. My country of origin was among the first traders on Earth, I'm talking about millenniums ago, we could'd invaded all the weaker country we were trading with and take all their wealth and oppress their people but it was morally and scientifically WRONG! Greed and evil are the words you are looking for not survival.
I can see a bit of jealousy with you Ashlee. It seems your life has not prospered and you're jealous that people who are not "ethnic British" (i.e. legal immigrants and their descendants !!!!) are economically better than you, because they worked hard and contributed to the economy. If you want to better yourself, work hard and improve your skills, rather than blaming people of a different ethnic origin.
Jealousy? Ok, lets get it out in the open. Yes, youre right. I'm not doing great economically. In fact...maybe I struggle a lot. There, you have that correct...BUT on that basis, I should be happier to let them reside here without objection if they were worse off than me? Wrong my friend. I couldnt care less if all the jobs were still all ours and they were living on hand me downs, its not just about economy, I just dont want them here. They dont belong here ethnically. To me, racemixing = wrong
@ashleelmb If you don't want to go out or have sex with a non-white, thats fine, its your choice, but you should not have the right to impose it on other people !!!!
@theworldvideos1: So, what about the government imposing multiculturism/multiracualism on us in this country? Why allow that but dissallow me from stating my view not to outbreed our indiginous British? And "stating" is the key word. I cant impose my my choice on other people...I dont have the power. Alls I have is my voice of objection. The government impose their idea on me because its in action and I didnt want it. Also, people originally didnt want it but it was imposed anyway.
@ashleelmb Well it wasn't imposed, because people voted for the party to power. Its called democracy !!! If most people were against multiculturalism, then they would voted for a far right party !!! But most people don't vote for any extremist party whether they are from the far left or far right, because they are corrupt and dictatorial !!! Look at Nick Griffin, he's so corrupt and dictatorial, that even Andrew Brons and Richard Edmonds want to remove him !!!!!
@theworldvideos1 you can't really believe that everything is so simple? its easy to convince you that all is well when you are busy trying to figure out one aspect of our plight. most of the factors in our demise are linked, though it would take research to uncover the real facts. for instance, some may claim that immigration is needed, but if we weren't focusing so much on ourselves and family instead, would we need it? there is a vast realm of knowledge that the masses do not acknowledge.
@theworldvideos1: It was imposed. People have never had fair choice of voting because the smaller partys are usually out of pocket and dont have the buget to put on huge campaigns like the Labour/Torys. People are regularly exposed to these well oiled party media machines who big up the these partys and the smaller partys get left in the dark. Also, the majority of people who vote UKIP/BNP are poor people who cant donate to the smaller partys to help them get their true message across...
...which is why when Labour/Torys (who are regularly broadcast) slam BNP, the party cannot object and fight back and then this leads people into believing what they hear. Its nothing to do with people actually seeing their agenda and making the right choice. When mass immigration started, there were huge riots and plenty of Brit nationalists objecting. Now those people have either given up or died only to be replaced with a new generation who have been indoctrinated to think miscegenation is ok.
...and thats happened through our left wing, liberal education system and through the laws that our young people are later led into accepting and living by. The regular thing I see/hear whenever I discuss this topic is "well we cant do nothing about it can we so I just accept it" - so that means if they could do something about it, they would? Theres a spark of nationalism in people but its been paved over with a "if you object, you'll suffer" so people have given up now. Communism comes to mind
...and as far as Nick Grifin goes, I cant comment on him being corrupt. He wasnt exposed as one of the ones on the expenses scandals of 2009 and I havent heard about anything to show to me that he will be a dictator...only a colonial maintainer to Britain and our indiginous people which is 100% what I want. And Nick Griffin stated that he wanted to stand down in 2012 to let someone else lead the party so Brons and Edmonds have opted to take his place when he has. It was arranged anyway.
How stupid! Britain was build with the blood of poor people the British empire enslaved or colonised. Britain invaded and colonised 25% of the world, millions were killed straight away, millions were over worked and starved to death + enslaved for the Glory of the "Great British Empire". Did the people want that? HELL NO! The Queen's crown is even from Ghana, you cant say shit! Britain could never compensate for its dirty past, every1 got the right to live here! Its your own fault!
@SniperAce187 nature intended for the strong to survive, we did, what do you want? do you honestly think that other races are more civilized than us, or less hostile or violent? do you think that, were the tables turned, we would receive any better? we wouldn't be speaking, the world as you know it wouldn't exist, and we'd have been killed off centuries ago.
@UnitedEurope88 , That's the oldest excuse in the book "Nature intended for the strong to survive". Are you an animal or something? Strength matters in animal kingdom. Co-operation and mutual respect as well as wisdom determines human existence. The tables did turn now, Britain isn't the "great power" it used to be. China was severely oppressed by the British, it could fuck the day lights out of Britain now, same for India and the others. Not every1 is blood thirsty like you
@SniperAce187: I think youre missing his point...back in primative times, primitive ways of life were rife and invasions and looting were survival. Of course, we have moved on from there now and today, we have took cooperation and mutual respect to whole new heights that are actually destroying us, our economy and our ability to survive as a nation. Cooperation and mutual respect doent have to include letting masses of immigrants reside here which jeopardises our way of life.
@SniperAce187 its the oldest excuse in the book because it is what nature intended for us. if we did not keep out primitives, to secure our genes and cultures, we would be no different than Africa. take a look outside of your window, because if our ancestors were as weak as we are today, none of that would exist, none of it would have mattered. so, when we talk about nations that millions of souls perished to protect, we should be careful when staking our claims in said nation.
And eastern Europeans you dont like right? xDD only western/northern right? xDD I dont like that pig hektor either.. and i was defending marmiteman as well.. but you mate.. i dont know.. you are "behind" and big leap behind.. maybe cos you are from liverpool.. and i hate liverpool and people there.. they are real scum.. i lived there for a while.. and it was nightmare of the place.. funny thing is.. that a lot of crossbreeds and coloured people were among you guys.. while you hated white Poles..
@TheVeneth as far as preferring coloreds over white Poles, i don't know.. but i don't resent them for hating us, as we are part of the problem. Poles are not to blame, it is the Poles who leave Poland. most of the Poles leaving Poland are not exactly the cream of the crop, and most do not care that, when they leave, their government has to call in waves of asian workers. this immigration is killing all countries, even if the immigrants are whites.
@UnitedEurope88 1) We didnt want to fall in the "box" called preffered or hated on the first place.. You did that to us.. just because of your arrogancy and selfishness.. and yes, the problem was and moreless is still in you.. and let me be more specific what that "problem" is.. You apply onto us the filosophy and practice that you have used with your coloured whatever origin they are.. And that was big mistake.. Because that is not just major insult but also statement itself..
@TheVeneth look.. i never gave you any reason to think i hated Poles, you are just being overly defensive. try to look at it from their point of view; they've had masses of non-white immigrants crammed into their little islands, and now they have to deal with the EU allowing the same amount of Eastern Europeans in. what this is doing is detrimental to the longterm survival of the British culture and genetic stock. granted, they may have conquered the Welsh, but that is another story altogether.
@UnitedEurope88 2) You are from Canada right? But your nick is "UnitedEurope88".. Well let me be little bit picky and show you how it feels when someone apply your type of "medicine".. You are judgeing us Poles or whatever Eastern Europeans while YOU are not European at ALL!! In fact when we were around looooong years the Canada DIDNT EVEN EXISTED, NOR AMERICA HAS BEEN COLONIZED..!! So realy if I was made out of same dough as you.. my reply would be: Fuck Off!!
@TheVeneth i may not have been born there, but i have more of a concern than you cheap, lazy (working hard for money is not hard working, try working to better your own country, not your wallet). i've been studying Polish history on my own time, have begun to learn Polish, and am in the process of actuating my DUAL CITIZENSHIP to Poland. oh, i didn't i mention that i'm Polish by citizenship? where i live was not a choice given to me, so don't start with that garbage. what will your children be?
@TheVeneth by the way, my family originates from Poznan, where the FIRST Polish people, the Polans tribe, migrated. from Great Moravia, my people came to a land in existence before YOUR (assuming that you're not from Poznan ;)) own. slippery slopes, my friend.
@UnitedEurope88 3) And yet we still not talking about of hundreds maybe thousands of foreigners who came to whole of eastern europe after the so called revolution and after succesfully bankrotizing us and buying everything for few pennies and paying in the pockets of traitors.. they took most of well paid jobs nad made sure that they will keep them.. they have families there and married our females.. While we are not eligible? Think twice and VERY carrefully beffore doing so..!
@TheVeneth because you had zionist jews controlling ALL of the Eastern Bloc. in the end, the real ones to blame are the jews, and i realize that it is not the fault of Poles, or anyone to want a better life, but it should not be at the expense of another race, ethnicity or otherwise. i believe that the English are making mistakes by alienating you, when they should realize the opportunity in swalling your pride and working together to fix this problem.
@TheVeneth my name is UnitedEurope88 because i have solidarity with ALL of my European brothers and sisters; they are what created me, what created the world and what will save it. i do love my country Canada, but i do not feel at home here. my goal is to return to Europe and do what i can to help. i may not have been born there, but i feel an immense sense to duty to my Fatherland and those part of the European family.
@UnitedEurope88 4) Get your facts right! Dont listen to "kids" from destroyed junkie families who hardy know their own names nor who they are! We dont own anything to anyone! We never did that! However your stace in this matter is much more contraversial and problematic.. Dont twist the facts and the meaning for the words! It can easilly happen to you as well.. Dont reply to me.. Think about what I have said.. This matter is closed for me..
Paybacks a bitch aint it, now you know the anger we felt and feel towards you British when you invaded our lands. I bet you butt fuck MarmiteMan and you sound like you have his cock in your mouth when you talk. India was a peacful land untill the British arrived, the Middle East was peacful untill the British arrived, you cunts have the blood of millions on your hands
Bloody hell! Another one trying to put post imperial guilt on me. I'm sick of saying to you bastards who say this shit every other day on here. I WASNT THERE. I WASNT ALIVE WHEN YOUR COUNTRY WAS INVADED AND NIETHER WERE YOU! You cant inherit a trauma, therefore modern Britain owes you nothing. The people who are responsible for the invasions are dead. So are the people who suffered. Its over! Except you started your own invasion here and I am alive, seeing and living it. I have a right to object
@LifeInATrench you mean as peaceful as the Huns, the Mongols, the Moors, the Ottomans, Tatar hordes and so on? whites have been murdered by the millions by foreign invaders, some openly stating that their intention was not to conquer but to exterminate Europeans, so we have every right to be wary and intolerant of foreigners.
of course there is no point in arguing with the likes of you, because you have no right to question our opinions regarding you and your ilk in our lands.
Calling folk niggers and mongrels, you need to watch that you don't get your head kicked in.Have a go at the scrounging recent influx of immigrants, but when you are talking about the British born blacks and mixed race folk you're treading on thin ice.
Especially showing your face! There's a few folk in Liverpool who are looking to jump your sorry bastard ass I bet, and I wouldn't blame em. you'll end up being the next Stephen Lawrence in reverse lolol
Who the fuck are you calling a twat you cheeky little faggot? And I say what I feel is right. I speak about anyone in Britian who doesnt have indiginous roots here ( people who arent decendents of the NW Europrean settlers who colonised Britain 13,000 yrs ago and helped establish this country into what its been for the past few hundred years). Anyone else shouldnt be here because ethnically, they dont belong here. And I dont care if you regard that as racist or not because either way its a fact.
And I show my face because I'm not ashamed of my views. But I know that it wouldnt make a difference whether I showed my face or not because you'd call me a coward or a pussy if I didnt but as I have youve chose to warn me about getting my head kicked in. And I get threats all the time that are just all talk. Ive even offered to gove my number out to a few and they dont seem to want to take it to the next level so again, I'm not worried...
Also you mentioned Steven Lawrence. Its the exact reverse of steven lawrence type crimes that is one of the reasons why I have my views and why I want immigrants sent back home. Multiculturism/a multi ethnic society doesnt work. Steven Lawrence shouldnt have been murdered but if he was living in his own country amongst his own, he might still be alive today because there would be no nationalist extremists with any ill intent. But our people shouldnt be subjected to crime from immigrants either.
You do realize it's a common strategy of the political party not in power to say the situation is shit, and place the blame on current leaders of the country. You also must realize that the UK still has one of the strongest economies in the world, which has recently been largely stimulated by immigrants. Those "stupid" leaders of your country don't increase the immigration quota to hurt your country. It's used to build economic infrastructure and increase demand from population growth.
I realise that from a political standpoint but there are very few partys who actually provide the right information on why the country is being run badly. I believe that the BNP are right in a lot of cases where they raise issues. Immigration takes away job opportunties for the British people. Increased demand is a good thing from a big company point of view but it also raises competition in the jobs market making it harder to get jobs, thus decreasing their willingness to pay a reasonable wage.
@ashleelmb Immigrants improve the quality of life/economy by competing for unskilled labour. By bringing in competition for unskilled labour, you reduce the costs associated with things like construction, which for example would allow construction businesses to flourish. This now successful construction company would be able to hire more English salespeople to run their office.
You can buy a mansion by UK standards in Texas for $200k because Mexican immigrants build the houses for so cheap.
@idiallin non-white immigration, or immigration in general, is not a stand alone issue. if we were promoting the progress of our own race, instead of grinding it to a halt to play hot to parasites worldwide, we'd have our own "unskilled labour", but that unskilled labour would also be white, and contribute to our natural process. take into consideration that these non-whites could not even progress their own kind, so what can we hope to gain from them when they become our majority?
@lethalsub: In my opinion, America...becuase they colonised it at a time when their wasnt many people living there. Not like us. We settled and colonised this country to an established nation before immigration on a stupid scale started. Anyway, why ask? America isnt my country.
@ashleelmb I was asking to see if the principle would still apply. Do you know how many people lived there prior to European colonisation, because I certainly don't. Modern theories suggest native Americans were killed mainly by diseases that the Europeans brought over, mostly diseases that thrive in densely populated regions such as cities.
@lethalsub: Yeah I seen a documentary on the Spanish colonising the western side of America about 400 years ago. They intergrated with the native Americans but they brought illnesses which made a lot of the native americans ill and many died because of it. It wasnt pretty. According to evidence that stands, there wasnt a huge population of native americans...but I wouldnt like to put a number on it. Also the US is a huge country of land and is big enough to share between colonys. Britain is tiny
Because I think racism is one of the most disgusting and ignorant qualities a person can have, I dont like to throw the term around easily, but ash you're coming across as racist comparing different races of humans to different species of animals! Lions and tigers aren't the same species just like humans and chimps arent the same species! But white black n brown humans ARE the same species. 'Mother nature' lets different coloured animals from different locations reproduce if they r same species
Look though mate, youre not getting my point are you? The fact is, we have let a group of leaders engineer a society of people together on a piece of land that was well established naturally before floods of immigration happened here and it has totally and irrationally damaged this country and the maintainence of us as a people who descended from the origional settlers and the culture that we have continued to hold on to are now doomed. Can you not see that?
@ashleelmb apparantly not lol. I respect the argument tht we shd limit immigration for alot of reasons bt to avoid the production of mixed babies isnt one. It looks like we'll respectfully have to agree to disagree on this issue because until someone can show me how 'mongrel' babies actually have a damaged quality of life, or significantly damage that of others I cant buy this. Nor do most British people; hence the BNP being in the gutter. If I like someone I dont care where they're from :)
Well the only other analogy I can say (as mentioned in my video) is if you were interviewing me for a job and you liked me but I didnt have the correct qualifications/the right amount of experience to fill the role. Would you employ me? No of course not. It isnt that you dont like me nor is it anything personal. I just dont fit into the requirements that youre looking for to have a place in your organisation. Its the same thing here but on a bigger scale but the requirement is to be indiginous.
@ashleelmb of course. But when 'employing' someone to be my friend or whatever, my requirements would be things like similar interests, friendship, humour, values, beliefs, attraction etc etc and thats obviously where we differ because I've found that in people from all races. Also if I was employing you for a job and I liked you but you didnt have the right qualifications etc, you could at least change that and get experience etc. At least I'd give you a chance through ur actions themself
As this discussion continues I want to just clarify that I dont particularly have anything against people from ethnic groups. There are good people from all backgrounds and Ive met many. But an immigrant is an immigrant, nice or not and nothing changes about the fact that they just dont belong here. In regards to the job thing, again, youre still not acknowleging that people have requirements in all kinds of situations. Why is their so called discrimination not regarded as unjust but mine is?
...And races seperate us into different subsections of humans just like cats have different subs in their species which seperate them, even though theyre all still cats. It doesnt matter what word you use to discribe the difference, they are still differences just the same whether its race or species. If we mix species like we mix races the same outcome occurs: Genecide of a definate organism due to purposeful interference. Lions & tigers can reproduce too but this is just as wrong to engineer.
Evolution hasnt separated us enough for us not to want to love each other, f**k each other and have viable offspring with each other lol!! If mixed race individuals were somehow deformed or prone to horrible conditions or something i could accept an argument but that obviously isnt the case...
so why is it wrong.....because it....just is....errrr
"so why is it wrong". Because its destroying 1000's of years worth of evolution that has continued to maintain the bloodline of us indiginous people that descended from the original settlers. Multiculturism is a socially engineered community of people from different areas of the globe. If we were all meant to be in one area of the world, together then mother nature wouldnt have seperated us into different subsections in different countrys (like lions and tigers - both cats but live seperate).
@ashleelmb They're different species lol they cant reproduce and have fertile viable offspring! we can! And 'mother nature' im not sure what you mean by that but as you're an atheist (right?) 'mother' nature isnt even a living entity so doesnt care about who sleeps with who...and she obviously hasnt done a very good job of separating us seeing as its so easy to walk, swim, ride or with technology fly etc into other countries, form friendships and relationshipis with other people and reproduce!
ashlee mate, you say you`re not racist but in another video of yours in the comments section you call one poster a `pin dicked little asian`. come on man if thats not racist what is? also, i understand your views, but what is your actual problem with multi-culturalism? do you not get along with blacks/asians or something? were they mean to you in school? lol. no but seriously man.....whats the problem with having a pakistani neighbour, for example?
@rangiri: Ok, if people start hurling abuse at me, I will retaliate and if that means using their ethnic background to belittle them then I will. If you dont agree, fine...but I dont do it to people who are civil because I feel that they are on my level. BUT, if someone starts throwing abuse at me when I'm stating my views civilly, I will come out of the civil circle as they have and I will have a pop at them based on my views on freedom of speech and that includes expressing my anger at pricks.
...ok, my problem with multiculturism is as stated in my numerous videos that Ive uploaded but if you want it in a nutshell, here it is: I like the feeling of living in amongst my own people. I like the pride I feel when I see British history unchanged and untouched by outside influences from other countrys. It saddens me to see my countrys identity changing from a nation of white Northwestern European people to a society of mixed races and cultures which is changing the face of our country...
...it feels alien to me. It feels wrong. It feels like our leaders and a lot of our own people in this country dont give a shit anymore about what our ancestors created and what they left us and it seems like the majority care even less about preserving our ethnic backgound as a Northwest European tribe of people. The more immigrants we house here, the more we create a mixed race generation and lose our character and identity as a race of people, and I think thats disrespectful to our ancestors.
You are interesting to watch and have strong passionate views, but why use offensive terms like mongrel people? Mongrels are dogs. Bi-racial, mixed race, half-caste, are more suited names for "People" who have parents from different backgrounds. I'm British born and bred (YAY!) My Mum's white British (YAY!) (my Dad was a black African therefore thats a bit of an issue I suppose (BOO!) If he was a e.g white South African, I'd be OK,
@halfbakednignog: Mate, I appreciate your comments, honestly I do but when you still insist that its all about your colour when Ive already cleared it up in THIS video that is not, I have nothing to say to you other than watch this again and listen to what I say in relation to the "colour" situation.
Of course, that's only dealing with people born in the UK who have moved abroad. Factoring in the descendents of Brits abroad (over 37,000,000 in the USA alone) then you've the huge British populations elsewhere, having all ethnicities returning to their "ancestral" homelands would more than double the UK population overnight, probably triple.
@nfe: Ok...fair enough. Fair point (if its true). But my points arent to do with how many of OUR people have left Britain to reside elswhere, my points are on how many people who ARNT our people have come here. If any of our people want to move elsewhere, fine. Its not going to have an impact on us as a nation because it doesnt effect our direction here as a society. Its up to those countrys where they end up to object to immigration if they wish...
...you also fail to mention that these countrys 1). Are probably much bigger and have much more space/land to accomodate for immigration 2). Many of these countrys where our people have emigrated to have gone to countrys were our people colonised and helped establish those nations and are the majority 3). probably need more people in their country to increase population growth at a rate that will actually benefit the country as it wont be overcrowded and would help build new towns/citys etc.
Sorry, but if you are arguing for repatriation from a moral standpoint - which you seem to be, with all the talk of what's "right" and what's "sick" and so on - then you must surely believe it applies to all peoples, including our own who have left Britain?
Whether these other places can accommodate higher populations isn't the point unless you're arguing for a cease to immigration and repatriation from an exclusively British population density aspect, but you aren't.
"Sorry, but if you are arguing for repatriation from a moral standpoint"...in relation to Britain as a country of people, yes. If people decide to leave Britain to go somewhere else, it doesnt concern us as a nation if they decide to leave here. If they wanted to come back, we'd welcome them back to. But I'm not saying I want to trap people into staying here. I do however want to say to people who dont belong here that your arnt allowed in. There is a big difference.
"all the talk of what's "right" and what's "sick" and so on - then you must surely believe it applies to all peoples, including our own who have left Britain?" yes, thats right. In an ideal world, I'd love to have all the chinese to be in china, all the indians in india, all the africans in africa...(etc) and not have miscegenation at all but my vote doesnt go that far. I only have the voice for one country, my own. And like I said, I dont want to trap people here. If they want to go, fine, go.
Likewise saying colonisation is ok really defeats your argument, they've been colonised within the last few hundred years, are you saying that if Britian is colonised and our population suffers genocide in the same fashion as the North American Indians, then afterwards it's fair game for our usurpers to remain the dominant population ever after? After all, it's quite, quite different from your stance on the inherited land of ancestors from thousands of years ago.
Ok, well I'll ask you a simple question then. How much of the land of America was uncolonised when our people went there and colonised that country? Millions of Acres of it. It was pretty much untouched. The red indians didnt have numbers that could even be classed as an official population. How many of us were here when immigration floods started by the 100,000's in the 80's/90's? 50,000,000 plus. Big difference. Colonisation is fine on land that hasnt been established as a nation. We were full
They had small populations, yes. Of course, having been there for tens of thousands of years, they populated all the best land. After the short peace we still felt compelled to slaughter them and steal it. THAT is what that colonisation entailed. But it's ok? I don't see how you make a coherent argument that claims that is ok but another population doing the same to Britain wouldn't be.
Look mate, how they went about colonising these places may not have been pretty and I cant say I agree with slaughter/genecide of any kind, especially when its in my own country involving my own people. But, youre involving my debate into areas of the world which I dont really have an opinion on because they are nothing to do with me or my country and neither are the people who live there so youre stating things which are irrelivant and using post imperial guilt doesnt make it any more relevant.
@ashleelmb It is relevant when you're trying to claim an objective moral line on what is acceptable and what is not regarding population movement. You go to lengths to say it is not a racist standpoint, you just believe everyone has their place and should stick to it. If it is not racist, it must apply equally to all populations at all times.
You either want ALL British descendants back, or your "objective" take on where people are meant to be falls apart and must be labelled racist.
I didnt say I wanted " ALL British descendants back". I said earlier that they can go if they wish to. You did read this didnt you? My stance is, "only British indiginous in Britain". Can you not do the maths of what that is? That statement should answer all your questions on whether he should be here or she should go there. It doesnt mean I want to bring all the descendants of Britain back here if they want to be elsewhere in the world. I just wish to deny entry to those people who arnt. Simple
Indiginous British people leaving us to go elsewhere to live a life somewhere else and miscegenate a new mixed ethnic generation in another country wont effect us here because we would be keeping out immigrants who may do this and damage our indiginous Northwest European population. That to me is the most important thing.
...Examples of countrys that will be included in huge proportions of your "5,500,000" brits living abroad will include: Australia - Huge country with a small population for its size...and who colonised it? We did...and we NW Europeans are the majority. New Zealand....ok, not huge: About the size of the UK but still has a small population. Majority? NW Europeans. America, Huge country again. Granted, there is a lot of mixed ethnics there but still we colonised it and still today were the majority
Sorry, the youtube comment function appears to be misfriring and things are getting out of order.
With regards to colonisation. You're sating that it is alright in your moral standpoint to become the dominant population by force? The Aboriginal and the American Indian civilisations having been subject to genocide as a byproduct of that colonisation, yes?
Now follow that line of thought to its logical conclusion as it pertains to our own population and immigrants...
"dominant population by force"...? I didnt mention anything about using force to dominate a population. They could have lived on 2 seperate sides of the land for all I care because I'll go back to my original point of...IF ITS NOT MY COUNTRY I COULDNT CARE LESS! And youre saying it as if it just happened and I should go and wrong my rights before I make my case. For one, I personally wasnt involved in it. I wasnt alive and even if I was, I'm in the wrong country to have made a difference anyway
...and 2, youre talking about hundreds of years ago when our ancestors were still hanging each other for things like witchcraft so how would you have expected them to deal with people from a different tribe in a land that they wanted for themselves? Again, I'm not saying it was right but we cant change what happened in the past. Its been and gone and theyve took over and settled there. These people in our country have just arrived as immigrants and they could be shipped back home tomorrow!
The reason I went to lengths to address the colonisations and overseas British populations I think I made clear in my previous post. If non-white-anglo-saxon British must be repatriated, then all anglo-saxon British elsewhere must be too. You can't demand one and not the other and call it colonial separatism as you have done.
On the point of it being hundreds of years ago and so irrelevant, the point I've been making is that we had multiculturalism in Britain WELL before the States
"If non-white-anglo-saxon British must be repatriated, then all anglo-saxon British elsewhere must be too. You can't demand one and not the other"...why cant I? I am stating my views for my country and my countrys people. My arguements dont reach out to people in other countrys whether thats my own people or people of other nations. Stop stretching my viewpoints to other countrys. If someone leaves, theyre no longer our responsibility and we can no longer call them back unless they want to...
You are claiming it is not a racist stance. You also claim it is not a border control or population issue. It is simply a case of wanting only "indigenous" Britons in Britain.
If the above is true, in order for it NOT to be racist, this opinion must apply to all populations worldwide. Ergo, you must want all British descendants back in Britain. Otherwise it is a racist outlook and your video is moot.
@nfe: I told you, in an ideal world, I'd love that to be the case...but I cant speak up for other countrys because I dont get to influence any countrys democracy but my own so I dont hold it as important as my own country, TO ME. And its you who cant understand. I can hold my view on colonial seperatism mainly on my own people only if I wish. I am one of my people and not of any other so why should I? I control my views, nobody else. Youre saying what my views should be and you have no right...
in conclusion, I want colonial seperaitism for MY OWN people in MY OWN country, Yes, I am concerned about the population here because there is so many migrants colonising this country while we Indiginous brits conceive at our usual pace and a lot of these ethnics breed at a faster rate than us (aledgidy) so this is also increasing the growing numbers of none indiginous people residing here. Our people emigrating is fine. It doesnt jeopardise us mantaining our British roots. Is this clear enough?
All of my questioning was to ascertain exactly what you did think, prior to calling you as such. But what you are saying is innately discriminatory based on ones race. And that's that. You're entirely entitled to think as you like of course, if it's what you believe, be proud of it. Just don't make videos accusing other people of needing to check their definitions.
@nfe: "Entirely. And is racist I'm afraid"...Im afraid? Wow, jeez, I'm so gutted you broke that news to me...gimme a break pal. Its colonial seperatism. "Racist: The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others."...I dont believe that race accounts for differences is character, ability nor do I believe that I or any of my race are superior to others...I think it is you who needs to do your definitions my friend.
Good grief. Come now, you can't pick one definition that you feel lets you off the hook and decide that's the only one that counts. As with most words, various definitions will be found, further more whether it's being used as a noun, a verb and adjective...
And an entirely valid one is "Discrimination based on race".
@nfe: lol, if you'd have given me a little bit more credit and time, I would have got onto that one before you'd have sent another message pointing out that I didnt mention the other meaning. I have commented on the "discrimination" word so I didnt miss it out intentionally. There is only so much space to write comments in after all. I expect you'll have your say on this aswell.
"Racist: Discrimination or prejudice based on race"..now this is a grey area isnt it? "Discrimination: To treat one particular group of people less favourably than others because of their race". I dont want anybody treated less favourably. I want the people who came here from other countrys to live in peace in their own country as much as I want my own people here to live in our country in peace with my own people only, taking part and maintaining our own race and culture with no objections.
@ashleelmb "I dont want anybody treated less favourably"
Yes you do, you want to allow certain people access to the nation while disallowing it to others and advocate sending people away who've been here for generations, both of which involve differing degrees of favour being shown to different groups. Whether you believe this difference to be justified on some biological-historical basis (which is tenuous, due to how mixed bloodlines are anyway) doesn't stop there being racial preference shown
@nfe I thought I'd write one last thing before I went to bed. Its not based on preferance...its based on maintaining a nation of people by colony so their bloodline and ethnic origin doesnt dissapear. Preferance has nothing to do with preventing racial genecide of my people.
...or unless that countrys leaders want them to leave. You never know, it could happen but until that happens, they stay if they wish. "On the point of it being hundreds of years ago and so irrelevant, the point I've been making is that we had multiculturalism in Britain WELL before the States"...not even the tiniest percentage of how it is now. And when you say multiculturism, you mean religions? Religion is bullshit. Ethnic origin is biological fact and that is real damage to a country.
No, I meant multiculturalism. If I meant religions I'd have said it.
I will repeat the main crux of the issue.
Your video revolves around you not being racist. You hold the same view to all ethnicities. If that is the case, you MUST consider the repatriation to their origins of ALL peoples to be paramount if you believe it being applicable anywhere. Otherwise the opinion is discriminatory and, as you'll know, having been talking about definitions, racist.
" If that is the case, you MUST consider the repatriation to their origins of ALL peoples to be paramount if you believe it being applicable anywhere"...Anywhere? Look pal, I told you...Im sorry to put this bluntly but I dont give a fuck about anywhere else. Why should I? I dont live in America, Africa, India, Punjabistan...so why do I give a toss about their colony of people to the point where I want indiginous British people to return home? MY country, MY concern, not my country NOT my concern
Purely in reference to your final point "the country is full up as it is". There were a little under 5,000,000 non-white people in the united kingdom as of the last census. Whilst there were around 5,500,000 Brits living abroad. Even factoring in population growth (in both directions) you'd be bringing in more people than you're sending away.
God bless MarmiteMan!!!
keyofdavid888 1 month ago
immigration wrecks communities
TheCasao86 2 months ago
i agree with ashlee why should the uk welcome half of eastern europe,africa and asia??
i dont like asians and most immigrants are truly PARASITES
TheCasao86 2 months ago
@TheCasao86: I cannot dislike people personally because I dont know every one of them individually BUT like I said in this vid, its the situation that I dislike because society has been socially engineered this way and it causes clashes in society with culture among other things so its rediculous how Britain has ended up like this.
ashleelmb 2 months ago
@ashleelmb i hate the situation too as it fosters a spirit of distrust and fear
TheCasao86 2 months ago
1:20 "He's not a racist and he's got nothing against any immigrants as long as they are not in this country. What's wrong with that?"
Well, for one, if they are not in this fucking country, then they are NOT immigrants, now are they?
OneLazyGimp 6 months ago
@OneLazyGimp: Correct...your point is?
ashleelmb 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ashleelmb I see it went right over your head, let me break it down for you:
1. "[...] got nothing against any immigrants as long as they are not in this country".
2. If they are not in this country, they are not immigrants.
3. The ONLY immigrants in UK are already in UK.
4. You can't say you have "nothing against any immigrants" and then exclude ALL actual immigrants, you fucking dimwit. Get it now?
OneLazyGimp 6 months ago
"I'm not a racist, I'm colonial-separatist, get it right". Yet, later on in the video ( 4:39)… "Mixing races is fucking disgusting, it's wrong and it shouldn't happen". Yeah, not racist at all ;)
BTW, United Kingdom wasn't always united. People who came to the British Isles were split into small, antagonistic tribes with a limited influence. If you believe that people should live where their ancestors did, you shouldn't travel at all. You should sit in your county for your whole life.
Kuba022 6 months ago
@Kuba022
The distinction is that those tribal peoples had to be extremely resiliant and pioneering - from the post-ice-age people who colonised the most extreme edges of their world to the Celts, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Scandinavians and Normans who had to fight tooth and nail to get into Britain.
You can hardly draw a comparison with a bunch of grinning middle-aged Afghanis who creep out of a lorry in Dover claiming that they're 15 years old and that they've conveniently lost their passport.
herringfly 5 months ago
Thanks for not screaming fuck at me like I expected you to do the whole time...I'll respond later today. And post it as a response next time so I can see it!!
CountHektor 6 months ago
The fact that you were born in a certain place, doesn't make it yours. You may not like people coming to the UK, but luckily it's not up to you to decide. You didn't colonize this place and you don't own it. If you want to keep certain people out of your comfort zone, fine, but that right ends where your property ends.
Don't act like you conquered the land and it's yours now. It is not.
Kuba022 6 months ago
@Kuba022 This FOOL in the video does NOT know what he's talking about! He's a TROLL and "pretends" to be BRIGHT when he's NOT! smh
Crazayblasiangirl 4 months ago
@Crazayblasiangirl: so let me get this straight. You inbox me with a bunch of abusive messages, comment on my video's about how Im a fool and how I'm a dumb ass nd you call me a troll. Girl, I am open for a civil debate here but youre pushing your luck. If you dont stop trolling MY video's then I will block you. Buck your idea's up. Youve already messaged my inbox with sexually dirogitory remarks but it doesnt really matter about that because I can read and delete. These comments are public!
ashleelmb 4 months ago
@ashleelmb good on you ash mate ignore her shes a racist
TheCasao86 2 months ago
Uhh you realize that whites are in entire continents where they don't belong. Are you going to take those back?
halycyon1234 6 months ago 2
@halycyon1234: Give me examples and I'll give you my answer for each. I cant put all of them in the same category...some countrys have been colonised by Europeans and some have just emigrated to other countrys that already have been colonised by other tribes people.
ashleelmb 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anti-immigrant or intelligent? Before you post, check out this YouTube video about poverty/immigration entitled:
Immigration by the Numbers -- Off the Charts
it's short and easy to understand. Then let me know what you think.
vechorik 6 months ago
@halycyon1234 Yes, whites went to entire continenets and introduced education, technology and infrastructure. Once those benefits were established, the indigenous peoples told the whites to bugger off. Predictably, it all then turned to shit. Now they have their hands out to us for cash to support their broken, corrupt societies.
herringfly 5 months ago
@herringfly yeah & u forgot 2 mention U all brought TONS of DISEASES, KILLED many ppl, are THIEVES (thy shall NOT STEAL!) who STOLE this land, POLLUTION, yada yada! ADMIT your WRONG doings & STOP being so SELF-RIGHTEOUS!
& btw, the Natives were EDUCATED BEFORE u CUNTS got here, just not according to YALL STUPID STANDARDS!!!! They actually used WISDOM! U STUPID INVADERS who have F'D up POLITICS!!! And there is NO universal definition of civilization so "SAVAGE" is the WRONG word 4 natives!
Crazayblasiangirl 4 months ago
@Crazayblasiangirl
You really do have a terrible mouth on you. Behave.
herringfly 4 months ago
Mate, Ive experienced first hand what kind of mouth this so called young lady has and the filth that comes out of her mind. She sent me a lovely message earlier. I wont go to deep about what she said but if I say derogitory sexual comments, that should give you enough to assume her message. Shes just a self riteous little black girl who thinks because her ancestors were slaves, she can put the world to rights but shes not inherited a trauma from slavery 100's of years ago so she can piss off.
ashleelmb 4 months ago
@herringfly Ur ALL IMMIGRANTS! Go bk to ur NATIVE LAND since u have a PROBLEM w/ NATIVES!!!!
Crazayblasiangirl 4 months ago
@Crazayblasiangirl If you mean the post ice-age hunter gatherers who came here 6-7 thousand years ago, and the Celts, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Scandinavians and Normans who fought their way into Britain, I think we deserve to stay here - unlike today's feckless economic migrants who abandon their families and creep out of a lorry in Dover looking for welfare benefits and a free ride. There is no comparison. Stick to American history.
herringfly 4 months ago
fucking go on Ash
TheBNPmuscle 7 months ago
i have a very high respect for you mate you couldent of your words better!!!!!!
PandaIVIonium 7 months ago
@PandaIVIonium Thanks man. I know there is still a few people out there who understand where I'm coming from...some people (a minority) are unenchanted by this multiculturism, politically correct bullshit but the rest seem to just fall into line and accept it, and a lot of people even believe that its all normal now. Pisses me off.
ashleelmb 7 months ago
.....yourself no favours by taking that stance. Why can't you be a nationalist and maintain an interest in other cultures that might have something to teach you, make you appreciate the diversity of life, or just plain bring some variety into your life? This is the area where you lose many people. Because so many nationalists seem to tie up their whole identity and sense of self in their race or nation with too much pride in whatever of these they had the luck to be born into.
SpiralOut011 7 months ago
It’s all too common for nationalists and anti immigration types to claim they are not hateful and then betray their claims when pressed further. You just claimed that and yet you immediately call someone a dirty race mixing bastard in the first comment I see (don’t care about your history with him) What if people of different races fall in love? If you oppose their love based on race then that is hateful pure and simple. And the other thing is the 'we don't wana know em' part. You do.......
SpiralOut011 7 months ago
@SpiralOut011 He's a DUMB ASS! He's prob. mixed w/ this & that so he can NOT be talking! It's RARE to not be mixed in this world! We ALL came from Adam & Eve anyways! When he says that sort of stuff, he is HATING his own ancestors! I bet he hates JESUS 2 who was a JEW! smh at this d.bag!
Crazayblasiangirl 4 months ago
.......So do you understand to any extent people’s suspicion of nationalist movements as perhaps having racists involved? Almost every person who I've met who takes a strong anti immigration stance has claimed it's not because of racism but has also revealed their racism on other occasions. If that was not the case with you then I'd be sympathetic, but the first comment I see on here makes me suspect otherwise.
SpiralOut011 7 months ago
Well, you make some good points on the differences between racism and nationalism. And I can understand how frustrating it must be to be constantly accused of taking a position you don't. However, would you admit that nationalist movements in many countries have been plagued by actual racism in the past? Some of which would probably still find it hard to separate their real racists from their nationalists, and that nationalism is a very convenient escape route or cover for racists? ...continued
SpiralOut011 7 months ago
If your don't believe in immigration then you are racist, you dumb fuck.
wesleysonic 7 months ago
@wesleysonic: Kiss my hairy white arse you dirty race mixing bastard. Oh and you cant expect to not have consequences for trolling me. Youre blocked! Bye dipshit!
ashleelmb 7 months ago
@wesleysonic If you don't beleive that people have a right to disagree with immigration then you not only disagree with freedom of speech, you disagree with freedom of thought. If our government thought like you we would live under a dictatorship!
100redsquirrel 6 months ago
You're having a LAUGH! It was not primitive times, it was less than a century ago! It had completely nothing to do with survival, Britain was not dying of hunger, it was rich. My country of origin was among the first traders on Earth, I'm talking about millenniums ago, we could'd invaded all the weaker country we were trading with and take all their wealth and oppress their people but it was morally and scientifically WRONG! Greed and evil are the words you are looking for not survival.
SniperAce187 8 months ago
I can see a bit of jealousy with you Ashlee. It seems your life has not prospered and you're jealous that people who are not "ethnic British" (i.e. legal immigrants and their descendants !!!!) are economically better than you, because they worked hard and contributed to the economy. If you want to better yourself, work hard and improve your skills, rather than blaming people of a different ethnic origin.
theworldvideos1 8 months ago
Jealousy? Ok, lets get it out in the open. Yes, youre right. I'm not doing great economically. In fact...maybe I struggle a lot. There, you have that correct...BUT on that basis, I should be happier to let them reside here without objection if they were worse off than me? Wrong my friend. I couldnt care less if all the jobs were still all ours and they were living on hand me downs, its not just about economy, I just dont want them here. They dont belong here ethnically. To me, racemixing = wrong
ashleelmb 8 months ago
@ashleelmb If you don't want to go out or have sex with a non-white, thats fine, its your choice, but you should not have the right to impose it on other people !!!!
theworldvideos1 8 months ago
@theworldvideos1: So, what about the government imposing multiculturism/multiracualism on us in this country? Why allow that but dissallow me from stating my view not to outbreed our indiginous British? And "stating" is the key word. I cant impose my my choice on other people...I dont have the power. Alls I have is my voice of objection. The government impose their idea on me because its in action and I didnt want it. Also, people originally didnt want it but it was imposed anyway.
ashleelmb 8 months ago
@ashleelmb Well it wasn't imposed, because people voted for the party to power. Its called democracy !!! If most people were against multiculturalism, then they would voted for a far right party !!! But most people don't vote for any extremist party whether they are from the far left or far right, because they are corrupt and dictatorial !!! Look at Nick Griffin, he's so corrupt and dictatorial, that even Andrew Brons and Richard Edmonds want to remove him !!!!!
theworldvideos1 8 months ago
@theworldvideos1 you can't really believe that everything is so simple? its easy to convince you that all is well when you are busy trying to figure out one aspect of our plight. most of the factors in our demise are linked, though it would take research to uncover the real facts. for instance, some may claim that immigration is needed, but if we weren't focusing so much on ourselves and family instead, would we need it? there is a vast realm of knowledge that the masses do not acknowledge.
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
@theworldvideos1: It was imposed. People have never had fair choice of voting because the smaller partys are usually out of pocket and dont have the buget to put on huge campaigns like the Labour/Torys. People are regularly exposed to these well oiled party media machines who big up the these partys and the smaller partys get left in the dark. Also, the majority of people who vote UKIP/BNP are poor people who cant donate to the smaller partys to help them get their true message across...
ashleelmb 8 months ago
...which is why when Labour/Torys (who are regularly broadcast) slam BNP, the party cannot object and fight back and then this leads people into believing what they hear. Its nothing to do with people actually seeing their agenda and making the right choice. When mass immigration started, there were huge riots and plenty of Brit nationalists objecting. Now those people have either given up or died only to be replaced with a new generation who have been indoctrinated to think miscegenation is ok.
ashleelmb 8 months ago
...and thats happened through our left wing, liberal education system and through the laws that our young people are later led into accepting and living by. The regular thing I see/hear whenever I discuss this topic is "well we cant do nothing about it can we so I just accept it" - so that means if they could do something about it, they would? Theres a spark of nationalism in people but its been paved over with a "if you object, you'll suffer" so people have given up now. Communism comes to mind
ashleelmb 8 months ago
...and as far as Nick Grifin goes, I cant comment on him being corrupt. He wasnt exposed as one of the ones on the expenses scandals of 2009 and I havent heard about anything to show to me that he will be a dictator...only a colonial maintainer to Britain and our indiginous people which is 100% what I want. And Nick Griffin stated that he wanted to stand down in 2012 to let someone else lead the party so Brons and Edmonds have opted to take his place when he has. It was arranged anyway.
ashleelmb 8 months ago
How stupid! Britain was build with the blood of poor people the British empire enslaved or colonised. Britain invaded and colonised 25% of the world, millions were killed straight away, millions were over worked and starved to death + enslaved for the Glory of the "Great British Empire". Did the people want that? HELL NO! The Queen's crown is even from Ghana, you cant say shit! Britain could never compensate for its dirty past, every1 got the right to live here! Its your own fault!
SniperAce187 8 months ago
@SniperAce187 nature intended for the strong to survive, we did, what do you want? do you honestly think that other races are more civilized than us, or less hostile or violent? do you think that, were the tables turned, we would receive any better? we wouldn't be speaking, the world as you know it wouldn't exist, and we'd have been killed off centuries ago.
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
@UnitedEurope88 , That's the oldest excuse in the book "Nature intended for the strong to survive". Are you an animal or something? Strength matters in animal kingdom. Co-operation and mutual respect as well as wisdom determines human existence. The tables did turn now, Britain isn't the "great power" it used to be. China was severely oppressed by the British, it could fuck the day lights out of Britain now, same for India and the others. Not every1 is blood thirsty like you
SniperAce187 8 months ago
@SniperAce187: I think youre missing his point...back in primative times, primitive ways of life were rife and invasions and looting were survival. Of course, we have moved on from there now and today, we have took cooperation and mutual respect to whole new heights that are actually destroying us, our economy and our ability to survive as a nation. Cooperation and mutual respect doent have to include letting masses of immigrants reside here which jeopardises our way of life.
ashleelmb 8 months ago
@SniperAce187 its the oldest excuse in the book because it is what nature intended for us. if we did not keep out primitives, to secure our genes and cultures, we would be no different than Africa. take a look outside of your window, because if our ancestors were as weak as we are today, none of that would exist, none of it would have mattered. so, when we talk about nations that millions of souls perished to protect, we should be careful when staking our claims in said nation.
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
@SniperAce187 the bones of your ancestors rest in Poland, that is where you should be.
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
@UnitedEurope88 if the bones*
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
Yes that is right, race mixing is disgusting and we're all sick of multiculturalism!
SinisterDespair1488 8 months ago
And eastern Europeans you dont like right? xDD only western/northern right? xDD I dont like that pig hektor either.. and i was defending marmiteman as well.. but you mate.. i dont know.. you are "behind" and big leap behind.. maybe cos you are from liverpool.. and i hate liverpool and people there.. they are real scum.. i lived there for a while.. and it was nightmare of the place.. funny thing is.. that a lot of crossbreeds and coloured people were among you guys.. while you hated white Poles..
TheVeneth 9 months ago
@TheVeneth as far as preferring coloreds over white Poles, i don't know.. but i don't resent them for hating us, as we are part of the problem. Poles are not to blame, it is the Poles who leave Poland. most of the Poles leaving Poland are not exactly the cream of the crop, and most do not care that, when they leave, their government has to call in waves of asian workers. this immigration is killing all countries, even if the immigrants are whites.
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
@UnitedEurope88 1) We didnt want to fall in the "box" called preffered or hated on the first place.. You did that to us.. just because of your arrogancy and selfishness.. and yes, the problem was and moreless is still in you.. and let me be more specific what that "problem" is.. You apply onto us the filosophy and practice that you have used with your coloured whatever origin they are.. And that was big mistake.. Because that is not just major insult but also statement itself..
TheVeneth 8 months ago
@TheVeneth look.. i never gave you any reason to think i hated Poles, you are just being overly defensive. try to look at it from their point of view; they've had masses of non-white immigrants crammed into their little islands, and now they have to deal with the EU allowing the same amount of Eastern Europeans in. what this is doing is detrimental to the longterm survival of the British culture and genetic stock. granted, they may have conquered the Welsh, but that is another story altogether.
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
@UnitedEurope88 2) You are from Canada right? But your nick is "UnitedEurope88".. Well let me be little bit picky and show you how it feels when someone apply your type of "medicine".. You are judgeing us Poles or whatever Eastern Europeans while YOU are not European at ALL!! In fact when we were around looooong years the Canada DIDNT EVEN EXISTED, NOR AMERICA HAS BEEN COLONIZED..!! So realy if I was made out of same dough as you.. my reply would be: Fuck Off!!
TheVeneth 8 months ago
@TheVeneth i may not have been born there, but i have more of a concern than you cheap, lazy (working hard for money is not hard working, try working to better your own country, not your wallet). i've been studying Polish history on my own time, have begun to learn Polish, and am in the process of actuating my DUAL CITIZENSHIP to Poland. oh, i didn't i mention that i'm Polish by citizenship? where i live was not a choice given to me, so don't start with that garbage. what will your children be?
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
@TheVeneth by the way, my family originates from Poznan, where the FIRST Polish people, the Polans tribe, migrated. from Great Moravia, my people came to a land in existence before YOUR (assuming that you're not from Poznan ;)) own. slippery slopes, my friend.
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
@UnitedEurope88 3) And yet we still not talking about of hundreds maybe thousands of foreigners who came to whole of eastern europe after the so called revolution and after succesfully bankrotizing us and buying everything for few pennies and paying in the pockets of traitors.. they took most of well paid jobs nad made sure that they will keep them.. they have families there and married our females.. While we are not eligible? Think twice and VERY carrefully beffore doing so..!
TheVeneth 8 months ago
@TheVeneth because you had zionist jews controlling ALL of the Eastern Bloc. in the end, the real ones to blame are the jews, and i realize that it is not the fault of Poles, or anyone to want a better life, but it should not be at the expense of another race, ethnicity or otherwise. i believe that the English are making mistakes by alienating you, when they should realize the opportunity in swalling your pride and working together to fix this problem.
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
@TheVeneth my name is UnitedEurope88 because i have solidarity with ALL of my European brothers and sisters; they are what created me, what created the world and what will save it. i do love my country Canada, but i do not feel at home here. my goal is to return to Europe and do what i can to help. i may not have been born there, but i feel an immense sense to duty to my Fatherland and those part of the European family.
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
@UnitedEurope88 wtf? Europeans will "save the world?" wtf is WRONG w/ u??? And GOD created the world, NOT people! That's a FIRST! R u like 7???
Crazayblasiangirl 4 months ago
@Crazayblasiangirl what can i say about you that you haven't already told the world with this comment?
UnitedEurope88 4 months ago
@Crazayblasiangirl (or your others, for that matter)
UnitedEurope88 4 months ago
@UnitedEurope88 4) Get your facts right! Dont listen to "kids" from destroyed junkie families who hardy know their own names nor who they are! We dont own anything to anyone! We never did that! However your stace in this matter is much more contraversial and problematic.. Dont twist the facts and the meaning for the words! It can easilly happen to you as well.. Dont reply to me.. Think about what I have said.. This matter is closed for me..
TheVeneth 8 months ago
Paybacks a bitch aint it, now you know the anger we felt and feel towards you British when you invaded our lands. I bet you butt fuck MarmiteMan and you sound like you have his cock in your mouth when you talk. India was a peacful land untill the British arrived, the Middle East was peacful untill the British arrived, you cunts have the blood of millions on your hands
LifeInATrench 9 months ago
Bloody hell! Another one trying to put post imperial guilt on me. I'm sick of saying to you bastards who say this shit every other day on here. I WASNT THERE. I WASNT ALIVE WHEN YOUR COUNTRY WAS INVADED AND NIETHER WERE YOU! You cant inherit a trauma, therefore modern Britain owes you nothing. The people who are responsible for the invasions are dead. So are the people who suffered. Its over! Except you started your own invasion here and I am alive, seeing and living it. I have a right to object
ashleelmb 9 months ago
@LifeInATrench you mean as peaceful as the Huns, the Mongols, the Moors, the Ottomans, Tatar hordes and so on? whites have been murdered by the millions by foreign invaders, some openly stating that their intention was not to conquer but to exterminate Europeans, so we have every right to be wary and intolerant of foreigners.
of course there is no point in arguing with the likes of you, because you have no right to question our opinions regarding you and your ilk in our lands.
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
You scouse sean connery sounding twat.
Calling folk niggers and mongrels, you need to watch that you don't get your head kicked in.Have a go at the scrounging recent influx of immigrants, but when you are talking about the British born blacks and mixed race folk you're treading on thin ice.
Especially showing your face! There's a few folk in Liverpool who are looking to jump your sorry bastard ass I bet, and I wouldn't blame em. you'll end up being the next Stephen Lawrence in reverse lolol
pairovtitsanafanny 9 months ago
Who the fuck are you calling a twat you cheeky little faggot? And I say what I feel is right. I speak about anyone in Britian who doesnt have indiginous roots here ( people who arent decendents of the NW Europrean settlers who colonised Britain 13,000 yrs ago and helped establish this country into what its been for the past few hundred years). Anyone else shouldnt be here because ethnically, they dont belong here. And I dont care if you regard that as racist or not because either way its a fact.
ashleelmb 9 months ago
And I show my face because I'm not ashamed of my views. But I know that it wouldnt make a difference whether I showed my face or not because you'd call me a coward or a pussy if I didnt but as I have youve chose to warn me about getting my head kicked in. And I get threats all the time that are just all talk. Ive even offered to gove my number out to a few and they dont seem to want to take it to the next level so again, I'm not worried...
ashleelmb 9 months ago
Also you mentioned Steven Lawrence. Its the exact reverse of steven lawrence type crimes that is one of the reasons why I have my views and why I want immigrants sent back home. Multiculturism/a multi ethnic society doesnt work. Steven Lawrence shouldnt have been murdered but if he was living in his own country amongst his own, he might still be alive today because there would be no nationalist extremists with any ill intent. But our people shouldnt be subjected to crime from immigrants either.
ashleelmb 9 months ago
You do realize it's a common strategy of the political party not in power to say the situation is shit, and place the blame on current leaders of the country. You also must realize that the UK still has one of the strongest economies in the world, which has recently been largely stimulated by immigrants. Those "stupid" leaders of your country don't increase the immigration quota to hurt your country. It's used to build economic infrastructure and increase demand from population growth.
idiallin 9 months ago
I realise that from a political standpoint but there are very few partys who actually provide the right information on why the country is being run badly. I believe that the BNP are right in a lot of cases where they raise issues. Immigration takes away job opportunties for the British people. Increased demand is a good thing from a big company point of view but it also raises competition in the jobs market making it harder to get jobs, thus decreasing their willingness to pay a reasonable wage.
ashleelmb 9 months ago
@ashleelmb Immigrants improve the quality of life/economy by competing for unskilled labour. By bringing in competition for unskilled labour, you reduce the costs associated with things like construction, which for example would allow construction businesses to flourish. This now successful construction company would be able to hire more English salespeople to run their office.
You can buy a mansion by UK standards in Texas for $200k because Mexican immigrants build the houses for so cheap.
idiallin 9 months ago
@idiallin non-white immigration, or immigration in general, is not a stand alone issue. if we were promoting the progress of our own race, instead of grinding it to a halt to play hot to parasites worldwide, we'd have our own "unskilled labour", but that unskilled labour would also be white, and contribute to our natural process. take into consideration that these non-whites could not even progress their own kind, so what can we hope to gain from them when they become our majority?
UnitedEurope88 8 months ago
Where do many Americans, descendants of European settlers, belong?
lethalsub 9 months ago
@lethalsub: In my opinion, America...becuase they colonised it at a time when their wasnt many people living there. Not like us. We settled and colonised this country to an established nation before immigration on a stupid scale started. Anyway, why ask? America isnt my country.
ashleelmb 9 months ago
@ashleelmb I was asking to see if the principle would still apply. Do you know how many people lived there prior to European colonisation, because I certainly don't. Modern theories suggest native Americans were killed mainly by diseases that the Europeans brought over, mostly diseases that thrive in densely populated regions such as cities.
lethalsub 9 months ago
@lethalsub: Yeah I seen a documentary on the Spanish colonising the western side of America about 400 years ago. They intergrated with the native Americans but they brought illnesses which made a lot of the native americans ill and many died because of it. It wasnt pretty. According to evidence that stands, there wasnt a huge population of native americans...but I wouldnt like to put a number on it. Also the US is a huge country of land and is big enough to share between colonys. Britain is tiny
ashleelmb 9 months ago
Because I think racism is one of the most disgusting and ignorant qualities a person can have, I dont like to throw the term around easily, but ash you're coming across as racist comparing different races of humans to different species of animals! Lions and tigers aren't the same species just like humans and chimps arent the same species! But white black n brown humans ARE the same species. 'Mother nature' lets different coloured animals from different locations reproduce if they r same species
Mshaw022 10 months ago
Look though mate, youre not getting my point are you? The fact is, we have let a group of leaders engineer a society of people together on a piece of land that was well established naturally before floods of immigration happened here and it has totally and irrationally damaged this country and the maintainence of us as a people who descended from the origional settlers and the culture that we have continued to hold on to are now doomed. Can you not see that?
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb apparantly not lol. I respect the argument tht we shd limit immigration for alot of reasons bt to avoid the production of mixed babies isnt one. It looks like we'll respectfully have to agree to disagree on this issue because until someone can show me how 'mongrel' babies actually have a damaged quality of life, or significantly damage that of others I cant buy this. Nor do most British people; hence the BNP being in the gutter. If I like someone I dont care where they're from :)
Mshaw022 10 months ago
Well the only other analogy I can say (as mentioned in my video) is if you were interviewing me for a job and you liked me but I didnt have the correct qualifications/the right amount of experience to fill the role. Would you employ me? No of course not. It isnt that you dont like me nor is it anything personal. I just dont fit into the requirements that youre looking for to have a place in your organisation. Its the same thing here but on a bigger scale but the requirement is to be indiginous.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb of course. But when 'employing' someone to be my friend or whatever, my requirements would be things like similar interests, friendship, humour, values, beliefs, attraction etc etc and thats obviously where we differ because I've found that in people from all races. Also if I was employing you for a job and I liked you but you didnt have the right qualifications etc, you could at least change that and get experience etc. At least I'd give you a chance through ur actions themself
Mshaw022 10 months ago
As this discussion continues I want to just clarify that I dont particularly have anything against people from ethnic groups. There are good people from all backgrounds and Ive met many. But an immigrant is an immigrant, nice or not and nothing changes about the fact that they just dont belong here. In regards to the job thing, again, youre still not acknowleging that people have requirements in all kinds of situations. Why is their so called discrimination not regarded as unjust but mine is?
ashleelmb 10 months ago
...And races seperate us into different subsections of humans just like cats have different subs in their species which seperate them, even though theyre all still cats. It doesnt matter what word you use to discribe the difference, they are still differences just the same whether its race or species. If we mix species like we mix races the same outcome occurs: Genecide of a definate organism due to purposeful interference. Lions & tigers can reproduce too but this is just as wrong to engineer.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
Evolution hasnt separated us enough for us not to want to love each other, f**k each other and have viable offspring with each other lol!! If mixed race individuals were somehow deformed or prone to horrible conditions or something i could accept an argument but that obviously isnt the case...
so why is it wrong.....because it....just is....errrr
Mshaw022 10 months ago
"so why is it wrong". Because its destroying 1000's of years worth of evolution that has continued to maintain the bloodline of us indiginous people that descended from the original settlers. Multiculturism is a socially engineered community of people from different areas of the globe. If we were all meant to be in one area of the world, together then mother nature wouldnt have seperated us into different subsections in different countrys (like lions and tigers - both cats but live seperate).
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb They're different species lol they cant reproduce and have fertile viable offspring! we can! And 'mother nature' im not sure what you mean by that but as you're an atheist (right?) 'mother' nature isnt even a living entity so doesnt care about who sleeps with who...and she obviously hasnt done a very good job of separating us seeing as its so easy to walk, swim, ride or with technology fly etc into other countries, form friendships and relationshipis with other people and reproduce!
Mshaw022 10 months ago
ashlee mate, you say you`re not racist but in another video of yours in the comments section you call one poster a `pin dicked little asian`. come on man if thats not racist what is? also, i understand your views, but what is your actual problem with multi-culturalism? do you not get along with blacks/asians or something? were they mean to you in school? lol. no but seriously man.....whats the problem with having a pakistani neighbour, for example?
rangiri 10 months ago
@rangiri: Ok, if people start hurling abuse at me, I will retaliate and if that means using their ethnic background to belittle them then I will. If you dont agree, fine...but I dont do it to people who are civil because I feel that they are on my level. BUT, if someone starts throwing abuse at me when I'm stating my views civilly, I will come out of the civil circle as they have and I will have a pop at them based on my views on freedom of speech and that includes expressing my anger at pricks.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
...ok, my problem with multiculturism is as stated in my numerous videos that Ive uploaded but if you want it in a nutshell, here it is: I like the feeling of living in amongst my own people. I like the pride I feel when I see British history unchanged and untouched by outside influences from other countrys. It saddens me to see my countrys identity changing from a nation of white Northwestern European people to a society of mixed races and cultures which is changing the face of our country...
ashleelmb 10 months ago
...it feels alien to me. It feels wrong. It feels like our leaders and a lot of our own people in this country dont give a shit anymore about what our ancestors created and what they left us and it seems like the majority care even less about preserving our ethnic backgound as a Northwest European tribe of people. The more immigrants we house here, the more we create a mixed race generation and lose our character and identity as a race of people, and I think thats disrespectful to our ancestors.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
You are interesting to watch and have strong passionate views, but why use offensive terms like mongrel people? Mongrels are dogs. Bi-racial, mixed race, half-caste, are more suited names for "People" who have parents from different backgrounds. I'm British born and bred (YAY!) My Mum's white British (YAY!) (my Dad was a black African therefore thats a bit of an issue I suppose (BOO!) If he was a e.g white South African, I'd be OK,
So its all about my colour Isn't it? Ah well...
halfbakednignog 10 months ago
@halfbakednignog: Mate, I appreciate your comments, honestly I do but when you still insist that its all about your colour when Ive already cleared it up in THIS video that is not, I have nothing to say to you other than watch this again and listen to what I say in relation to the "colour" situation.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@FrozenUtility: I agree mate.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
Continued...
Of course, that's only dealing with people born in the UK who have moved abroad. Factoring in the descendents of Brits abroad (over 37,000,000 in the USA alone) then you've the huge British populations elsewhere, having all ethnicities returning to their "ancestral" homelands would more than double the UK population overnight, probably triple.
nfe 10 months ago
@nfe: Ok...fair enough. Fair point (if its true). But my points arent to do with how many of OUR people have left Britain to reside elswhere, my points are on how many people who ARNT our people have come here. If any of our people want to move elsewhere, fine. Its not going to have an impact on us as a nation because it doesnt effect our direction here as a society. Its up to those countrys where they end up to object to immigration if they wish...
ashleelmb 10 months ago
...you also fail to mention that these countrys 1). Are probably much bigger and have much more space/land to accomodate for immigration 2). Many of these countrys where our people have emigrated to have gone to countrys were our people colonised and helped establish those nations and are the majority 3). probably need more people in their country to increase population growth at a rate that will actually benefit the country as it wont be overcrowded and would help build new towns/citys etc.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb
Sorry, but if you are arguing for repatriation from a moral standpoint - which you seem to be, with all the talk of what's "right" and what's "sick" and so on - then you must surely believe it applies to all peoples, including our own who have left Britain?
Whether these other places can accommodate higher populations isn't the point unless you're arguing for a cease to immigration and repatriation from an exclusively British population density aspect, but you aren't.
cont...
nfe 10 months ago
"Sorry, but if you are arguing for repatriation from a moral standpoint"...in relation to Britain as a country of people, yes. If people decide to leave Britain to go somewhere else, it doesnt concern us as a nation if they decide to leave here. If they wanted to come back, we'd welcome them back to. But I'm not saying I want to trap people into staying here. I do however want to say to people who dont belong here that your arnt allowed in. There is a big difference.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
"all the talk of what's "right" and what's "sick" and so on - then you must surely believe it applies to all peoples, including our own who have left Britain?" yes, thats right. In an ideal world, I'd love to have all the chinese to be in china, all the indians in india, all the africans in africa...(etc) and not have miscegenation at all but my vote doesnt go that far. I only have the voice for one country, my own. And like I said, I dont want to trap people here. If they want to go, fine, go.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
Likewise saying colonisation is ok really defeats your argument, they've been colonised within the last few hundred years, are you saying that if Britian is colonised and our population suffers genocide in the same fashion as the North American Indians, then afterwards it's fair game for our usurpers to remain the dominant population ever after? After all, it's quite, quite different from your stance on the inherited land of ancestors from thousands of years ago.
You need a consistent stance.
nfe 10 months ago
Ok, well I'll ask you a simple question then. How much of the land of America was uncolonised when our people went there and colonised that country? Millions of Acres of it. It was pretty much untouched. The red indians didnt have numbers that could even be classed as an official population. How many of us were here when immigration floods started by the 100,000's in the 80's/90's? 50,000,000 plus. Big difference. Colonisation is fine on land that hasnt been established as a nation. We were full
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb
They had small populations, yes. Of course, having been there for tens of thousands of years, they populated all the best land. After the short peace we still felt compelled to slaughter them and steal it. THAT is what that colonisation entailed. But it's ok? I don't see how you make a coherent argument that claims that is ok but another population doing the same to Britain wouldn't be.
nfe 10 months ago
Look mate, how they went about colonising these places may not have been pretty and I cant say I agree with slaughter/genecide of any kind, especially when its in my own country involving my own people. But, youre involving my debate into areas of the world which I dont really have an opinion on because they are nothing to do with me or my country and neither are the people who live there so youre stating things which are irrelivant and using post imperial guilt doesnt make it any more relevant.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb It is relevant when you're trying to claim an objective moral line on what is acceptable and what is not regarding population movement. You go to lengths to say it is not a racist standpoint, you just believe everyone has their place and should stick to it. If it is not racist, it must apply equally to all populations at all times.
You either want ALL British descendants back, or your "objective" take on where people are meant to be falls apart and must be labelled racist.
nfe 10 months ago
I didnt say I wanted " ALL British descendants back". I said earlier that they can go if they wish to. You did read this didnt you? My stance is, "only British indiginous in Britain". Can you not do the maths of what that is? That statement should answer all your questions on whether he should be here or she should go there. It doesnt mean I want to bring all the descendants of Britain back here if they want to be elsewhere in the world. I just wish to deny entry to those people who arnt. Simple
ashleelmb 10 months ago
Indiginous British people leaving us to go elsewhere to live a life somewhere else and miscegenate a new mixed ethnic generation in another country wont effect us here because we would be keeping out immigrants who may do this and damage our indiginous Northwest European population. That to me is the most important thing.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
...Examples of countrys that will be included in huge proportions of your "5,500,000" brits living abroad will include: Australia - Huge country with a small population for its size...and who colonised it? We did...and we NW Europeans are the majority. New Zealand....ok, not huge: About the size of the UK but still has a small population. Majority? NW Europeans. America, Huge country again. Granted, there is a lot of mixed ethnics there but still we colonised it and still today were the majority
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb
Sorry, the youtube comment function appears to be misfriring and things are getting out of order.
With regards to colonisation. You're sating that it is alright in your moral standpoint to become the dominant population by force? The Aboriginal and the American Indian civilisations having been subject to genocide as a byproduct of that colonisation, yes?
Now follow that line of thought to its logical conclusion as it pertains to our own population and immigrants...
nfe 10 months ago
"dominant population by force"...? I didnt mention anything about using force to dominate a population. They could have lived on 2 seperate sides of the land for all I care because I'll go back to my original point of...IF ITS NOT MY COUNTRY I COULDNT CARE LESS! And youre saying it as if it just happened and I should go and wrong my rights before I make my case. For one, I personally wasnt involved in it. I wasnt alive and even if I was, I'm in the wrong country to have made a difference anyway
ashleelmb 10 months ago
...and 2, youre talking about hundreds of years ago when our ancestors were still hanging each other for things like witchcraft so how would you have expected them to deal with people from a different tribe in a land that they wanted for themselves? Again, I'm not saying it was right but we cant change what happened in the past. Its been and gone and theyve took over and settled there. These people in our country have just arrived as immigrants and they could be shipped back home tomorrow!
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb
The reason I went to lengths to address the colonisations and overseas British populations I think I made clear in my previous post. If non-white-anglo-saxon British must be repatriated, then all anglo-saxon British elsewhere must be too. You can't demand one and not the other and call it colonial separatism as you have done.
On the point of it being hundreds of years ago and so irrelevant, the point I've been making is that we had multiculturalism in Britain WELL before the States
nfe 10 months ago
"If non-white-anglo-saxon British must be repatriated, then all anglo-saxon British elsewhere must be too. You can't demand one and not the other"...why cant I? I am stating my views for my country and my countrys people. My arguements dont reach out to people in other countrys whether thats my own people or people of other nations. Stop stretching my viewpoints to other countrys. If someone leaves, theyre no longer our responsibility and we can no longer call them back unless they want to...
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb
I'm not sure why this is hard to understand.
You are claiming it is not a racist stance. You also claim it is not a border control or population issue. It is simply a case of wanting only "indigenous" Britons in Britain.
If the above is true, in order for it NOT to be racist, this opinion must apply to all populations worldwide. Ergo, you must want all British descendants back in Britain. Otherwise it is a racist outlook and your video is moot.
nfe 10 months ago
@nfe: I told you, in an ideal world, I'd love that to be the case...but I cant speak up for other countrys because I dont get to influence any countrys democracy but my own so I dont hold it as important as my own country, TO ME. And its you who cant understand. I can hold my view on colonial seperatism mainly on my own people only if I wish. I am one of my people and not of any other so why should I? I control my views, nobody else. Youre saying what my views should be and you have no right...
ashleelmb 10 months ago
in conclusion, I want colonial seperaitism for MY OWN people in MY OWN country, Yes, I am concerned about the population here because there is so many migrants colonising this country while we Indiginous brits conceive at our usual pace and a lot of these ethnics breed at a faster rate than us (aledgidy) so this is also increasing the growing numbers of none indiginous people residing here. Our people emigrating is fine. It doesnt jeopardise us mantaining our British roots. Is this clear enough?
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb
Entirely. And is racist I'm afraid.
All of my questioning was to ascertain exactly what you did think, prior to calling you as such. But what you are saying is innately discriminatory based on ones race. And that's that. You're entirely entitled to think as you like of course, if it's what you believe, be proud of it. Just don't make videos accusing other people of needing to check their definitions.
nfe 10 months ago
@nfe: "Entirely. And is racist I'm afraid"...Im afraid? Wow, jeez, I'm so gutted you broke that news to me...gimme a break pal. Its colonial seperatism. "Racist: The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others."...I dont believe that race accounts for differences is character, ability nor do I believe that I or any of my race are superior to others...I think it is you who needs to do your definitions my friend.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb
Good grief. Come now, you can't pick one definition that you feel lets you off the hook and decide that's the only one that counts. As with most words, various definitions will be found, further more whether it's being used as a noun, a verb and adjective...
And an entirely valid one is "Discrimination based on race".
nfe 10 months ago
@nfe: lol, if you'd have given me a little bit more credit and time, I would have got onto that one before you'd have sent another message pointing out that I didnt mention the other meaning. I have commented on the "discrimination" word so I didnt miss it out intentionally. There is only so much space to write comments in after all. I expect you'll have your say on this aswell.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@nfe: Anyway, Im going to bed. If you reply, I'll pick up where I left of tomorrow. Goodnight. Thanks for the civil debate.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
"Racist: Discrimination or prejudice based on race"..now this is a grey area isnt it? "Discrimination: To treat one particular group of people less favourably than others because of their race". I dont want anybody treated less favourably. I want the people who came here from other countrys to live in peace in their own country as much as I want my own people here to live in our country in peace with my own people only, taking part and maintaining our own race and culture with no objections.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb "I dont want anybody treated less favourably"
Yes you do, you want to allow certain people access to the nation while disallowing it to others and advocate sending people away who've been here for generations, both of which involve differing degrees of favour being shown to different groups. Whether you believe this difference to be justified on some biological-historical basis (which is tenuous, due to how mixed bloodlines are anyway) doesn't stop there being racial preference shown
nfe 10 months ago
@nfe I thought I'd write one last thing before I went to bed. Its not based on preferance...its based on maintaining a nation of people by colony so their bloodline and ethnic origin doesnt dissapear. Preferance has nothing to do with preventing racial genecide of my people.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
...or unless that countrys leaders want them to leave. You never know, it could happen but until that happens, they stay if they wish. "On the point of it being hundreds of years ago and so irrelevant, the point I've been making is that we had multiculturalism in Britain WELL before the States"...not even the tiniest percentage of how it is now. And when you say multiculturism, you mean religions? Religion is bullshit. Ethnic origin is biological fact and that is real damage to a country.
ashleelmb 10 months ago
@ashleelmb
No, I meant multiculturalism. If I meant religions I'd have said it.
I will repeat the main crux of the issue.
Your video revolves around you not being racist. You hold the same view to all ethnicities. If that is the case, you MUST consider the repatriation to their origins of ALL peoples to be paramount if you believe it being applicable anywhere. Otherwise the opinion is discriminatory and, as you'll know, having been talking about definitions, racist.
nfe 10 months ago
" If that is the case, you MUST consider the repatriation to their origins of ALL peoples to be paramount if you believe it being applicable anywhere"...Anywhere? Look pal, I told you...Im sorry to put this bluntly but I dont give a fuck about anywhere else. Why should I? I dont live in America, Africa, India, Punjabistan...so why do I give a toss about their colony of people to the point where I want indiginous British people to return home? MY country, MY concern, not my country NOT my concern
ashleelmb 10 months ago
Purely in reference to your final point "the country is full up as it is". There were a little under 5,000,000 non-white people in the united kingdom as of the last census. Whilst there were around 5,500,000 Brits living abroad. Even factoring in population growth (in both directions) you'd be bringing in more people than you're sending away.
cont...
nfe 10 months ago