Whats wrong with your comments? Chamahk has been slow, weak and poor since Van Persie came back from Injury in November 2010. 2 goals in his last 38 games, and he's still yet to show any fighting signs he wants to get better. His work rate and positioning are PATHETIC. Yet you guys comment like he's great. What the fuck have you gooners been watching? Having faith in him is great, but don't disillusion yourself, for the past year he's been shit! and his performance against Leeds sums him up
@Camzy90 Completely agree, Chamakh has to go. Simply not good enough. The people that say 'he is great' or 'the best player in Arsenal' are usually Moroccan. For obvious reasons....
to me, chamakh is great. but, he has fallen very very badly. even torres has not fallen to chamakh extent. podolski will do fine but i hope vela gets a chance too. he's great. and sanchez watt. a great prospect!
@drfred26 Chamakh is a good player. He just needs more time to get used to English football. He is an aerial threat,, he's technical, he's got vison and he's strong, has tons of energy and has all the instincts of a good striker. He's frustrating to watch at times but patience is the best word for him.
@kevin084life Have you been watching Chamakh in 2011?
He's got no vision, no technical skills, and probably strongest of all - no energy. He's quite the header, and makes space in the box for other players. But in my mind, he's no way near Walcott og Gervinho. And with them, it's hard playing 4-4-2. Watch some matches, before you speak.
@telgoTV That's because he needs more time to adjust to the English style of play. When he was at Bordeaux he was amazing and finished top scorer in his last season in the French Ligue 1. Look at that goal aginst AC Milan he scored at 0:24. Look at the header at 2:42 and the header against Wolves at 2:48, which shows he is an aerial threat. Trust me with a little more time to adapt he will be much better than when he came. He's not the best striker in the world but he is decent.
@kevin084life But a club like Arsenal shouldn't settle for decent. We need class players, and Chamakh just isn't one of them. He has been here for quite some time now, and should feel home on english pitches about now. Yes, he is an areal threat, but he is too busy running around on the wings laying crosses, when he's actually the one who needs to finish the crosses.
@telgoTV True. When Chamakh goes away to the African Cup of Nations I think Wenger is gonna buy a new striker. Lukas Podolski is a strong transfer target who is fast, good at finishing and is a great dribbler. I also heard Arsenal might sign Neymar but that is highly unlikely seeing as he has a £40-50m price tag on his head.
@kevin084life I've also heard the rumours about Podolski, and as much as I would like that tranfer to happen, I don't think it will. He always has to be in clubs where he can be the star, and he wouldn't be i Arsenal. I would love Cavani or Moussa Sow.
All we could take from this video is that he is rubbish as a player. He is 27, getting past his prime. It's funny how this video was supposed to highlight his best qualities... bahahahaha
@skcdl theres no such thing as prime anymore henry drogba and giggs to mention a few have proved that if he had a chance he would be a goodish striker
wenger needs to play 442 or even 4411 next season. gervinho can play as a winger/LM/RM with walcott. i just don't want to see a player with chamakhs talent on the bench
We don't need another striker. Rvp first choice, Chamakh will get better next season, and Vela as a backup. We get alot of our goals from midfield anyway.
what I want to know is why wenger droped chamakh just becasue van persie was back I mean chami was scoring and in good form he should have done a 4-4-2
Arsene has to stop buying this players from league 1, their cheep for a reason, he should buy falcao, its going to cost him but its going to be worth it.
@EnzoCheLatino Ligue 1 has some class players, and usually they're not cheap so i don't know what you're on about. The reason Chamakh was cheap was because he was on a free. Wenger gets the cheap players because he's world class at spotting talent, and he does that from every league, not just France. Look at Sagna, i think about £7mil and he's the most consistent RB in the Premiership.
@robinvpersie133 He is not world class at spotting talent otherwise arsenal would have won something by now, he gets 1 signing right every of 10 young players he buys, arsene is prejudice most the player he buys are from league 1, instead of Spanish primera where players are twice as talented.
@EnzoCheLatino Arsenal have won something, remember the invincible side in 2004? Yeah he hasn't got it right recently, but that's not because he can't spot talent. If a player doesn't reach their potential, he sells them on for a profit - nothing wrong with that. La Liga is the second best league on the planet, but the players arn't the same, most of them get bullied off the ball, even the defenders.
@robinvpersie133 La liga is the best league in the planet, and produce the most talented, technically gifted players, which would be perfect for arsenals way of playing football, and they don’t get bullied of the ball, i don’t know what the fuck you are on about. Its better than premier league where there is no tactical order.
@EnzoCheLatino Most of la liga players are small, and wouldn't fit the premier league. In the league ranking, the premiership is the best in world, that's why I'm saying it. I don't know what you mean by tactical order, but in la liga there are only 2 teams competing to win the league, and that's boring.
@robinvpersie133 That is because they are the two best teams in the world, and it doesnt matter if a players is small, a lot of the best players in the world are small.
@EnzoCheLatino I'm not saying it matters, I'm saying that they don't usually suit the premiership - only the very best do. Real Madrid are not the second best team in the world, not by a long shot.
@robinvpersie133 No, then who is, because had real madrid played manchester united in the semi final of champions league there would have been two spanish teams in the final, and we came second in la liga to maybe the best team in history.
@EnzoCheLatino How do you know Madrid would have beat United? I don't think they would have, you can't prove that. Yeah, but Madrid are the second best in la liga, not the world - that argument doesn't prove anything. I'm bored of this now.
@robinvpersie133 Yes we would have, we have better players, recieved less goals in champions league than you, and we scored more, Real madrid is the second best team in the world.
i hope he gets a better chance next season, but i want so see vela given games too, so its a touch choice. I really don't think Arsenal need anymore strikers, just a CB, winger, and a LB if clichy goes
@TheTouriOne Arsenal is the right team for him, if they change their formation to 4-4-2. Robin Van Persie and Chamakh on top, a technical striker, who can lay cross, and a striker who
@MrEriko2904 yeah i know that its the right if they change the formation , but i think that Arsene Wenger is getting worse and worse ! how can he put a player like this on the benc , and sometime he dont even call him !
thats why i think that Wenger made a mistake by Buying him .. btw he is Great and deserve to be Official
@MrEriko2904 No,it's not balanced. 4-4-3 is the right formation but with 3 strikers at the front like v.Persie - Chamakh - Walcott (Chamakh in the middle so others can do more cross to him)
@arsenalondonorth I don't think 4-3-3 is the right formation. I don't see van Persie as a winger, but a striker. But Van Persie can play as a left winger, but that's not his favourite position. 4-3-3 is good formation for Arsenal, but I think 4-4-2 is a better formation.
@MrEriko2904 Well, if that so Arshavin can play the as the winger or even other. But if only Wenger wants to use Chamakh. If not, otherwise it's v.Persie in the middle.
@arsenalondonorth Correct. Chamakh isn't the first choice for Wenger, and hope he will give Chamakh much more trust than he did on the end of this season.
@MrEriko2904 lm sure you can modify that formation to bring van persie closer and l think its better for him as a right winger, less crossing more dribbling
chamakh is the gayest player alive
navarrorickyfire11 1 month ago
Whats wrong with your comments? Chamahk has been slow, weak and poor since Van Persie came back from Injury in November 2010. 2 goals in his last 38 games, and he's still yet to show any fighting signs he wants to get better. His work rate and positioning are PATHETIC. Yet you guys comment like he's great. What the fuck have you gooners been watching? Having faith in him is great, but don't disillusion yourself, for the past year he's been shit! and his performance against Leeds sums him up
Camzy90 1 month ago
@Camzy90 Completely agree, Chamakh has to go. Simply not good enough. The people that say 'he is great' or 'the best player in Arsenal' are usually Moroccan. For obvious reasons....
drfred26 1 month ago
ever think the african cup of nations will help him find his form? heres hoping!
bowlocheerios97 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Whats the name of the song??
zGoZclan1 2 months ago
chamakh should start against villa - and score a hat trick!
peeeko5 2 months ago
hope gourcuff comes to arsenal. Djourour and squallici MUST leave, so wenger nids to buy a CB. promote miquel to first-team.
iDivineDestiny 2 months ago
to me, chamakh is great. but, he has fallen very very badly. even torres has not fallen to chamakh extent. podolski will do fine but i hope vela gets a chance too. he's great. and sanchez watt. a great prospect!
iDivineDestiny 2 months ago
Look at Chamakh's finish against Wolves at 3:01
kevin084life 2 months ago
Bring hulk from porto
rockhopper121 3 months ago
he is good..but not good for arsenal..please Wenger bring Physical player like hulk...
MyHunterhunt 3 months ago
AERIAL THREAT
LuisMayneHD 4 months ago
this guy is friggin dangerous on air!
JackalzProduction 5 months ago
A great muslim soccer player
gtaivstar1 5 months ago
@gtaivstar1 You mean an awful muslim 'football' player? He is not Arsenal standard. He needs to go in January.
drfred26 4 months ago
@drfred26 suck my d***
gtaivstar1 4 months ago
@drfred26 Chamakh is a good player. He just needs more time to get used to English football. He is an aerial threat,, he's technical, he's got vison and he's strong, has tons of energy and has all the instincts of a good striker. He's frustrating to watch at times but patience is the best word for him.
kevin084life 4 months ago
@kevin084life Have you been watching Chamakh in 2011?
He's got no vision, no technical skills, and probably strongest of all - no energy. He's quite the header, and makes space in the box for other players. But in my mind, he's no way near Walcott og Gervinho. And with them, it's hard playing 4-4-2. Watch some matches, before you speak.
telgoTV 2 months ago
@telgoTV That's because he needs more time to adjust to the English style of play. When he was at Bordeaux he was amazing and finished top scorer in his last season in the French Ligue 1. Look at that goal aginst AC Milan he scored at 0:24. Look at the header at 2:42 and the header against Wolves at 2:48, which shows he is an aerial threat. Trust me with a little more time to adapt he will be much better than when he came. He's not the best striker in the world but he is decent.
kevin084life 2 months ago
@kevin084life But a club like Arsenal shouldn't settle for decent. We need class players, and Chamakh just isn't one of them. He has been here for quite some time now, and should feel home on english pitches about now. Yes, he is an areal threat, but he is too busy running around on the wings laying crosses, when he's actually the one who needs to finish the crosses.
telgoTV 2 months ago
@telgoTV True. When Chamakh goes away to the African Cup of Nations I think Wenger is gonna buy a new striker. Lukas Podolski is a strong transfer target who is fast, good at finishing and is a great dribbler. I also heard Arsenal might sign Neymar but that is highly unlikely seeing as he has a £40-50m price tag on his head.
kevin084life 2 months ago
@kevin084life I've also heard the rumours about Podolski, and as much as I would like that tranfer to happen, I don't think it will. He always has to be in clubs where he can be the star, and he wouldn't be i Arsenal. I would love Cavani or Moussa Sow.
telgoTV 2 months ago
Song Name: Sean Paul Temperature
gtaivstar1 5 months ago
the best player in the air!
Dunganin31 5 months ago
Hope chamakh starts again as he scored and will score more.
scaprslayer 5 months ago
All we could take from this video is that he is rubbish as a player. He is 27, getting past his prime. It's funny how this video was supposed to highlight his best qualities... bahahahaha
skcdl 6 months ago
@skcdl theres no such thing as prime anymore henry drogba and giggs to mention a few have proved that if he had a chance he would be a goodish striker
AZAVANPERSIE10 6 months ago
2:34 !!
BeHepi 6 months ago
im a liverpool fan and i think chamakh is decent the only problem is he is hardly played
DCPR3D4TOR 6 months ago
he is so poor in real life.
jimmy13United 6 months ago
@jimmy13United that was last season you fuckhead and you say he is so bad in real life. lol its coming from a manure cunt anyway
pojomon1234 6 months ago in playlist pojomon1234's Favorited Videos
This has been flagged as spam show
3atiha gir Lzgill .. Mfafi .. g
aminerb 6 months ago
3atiha gir Lzgill .. Mfafi ..
aminerb 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3atiha gir Lzgill .. Mfafi .. k
aminerb 6 months ago
3atiha gir Lzgill .. Mfafi ..
aminerb 6 months ago
Video proofs what chamakh can do just give him time
scaprslayer 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Song is temperature by sean paul
siegetank55 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The song is temperature Sean Paul.
Famousangel12 7 months ago
wats the song called
carlos24930 7 months ago
@carlos24930 Temprature - Sean Paul :)
SunnySingh95 6 months ago
Way is the name of this beastly song??
olimillz9 7 months ago
wenger needs to play 442 or even 4411 next season. gervinho can play as a winger/LM/RM with walcott. i just don't want to see a player with chamakhs talent on the bench
pojomon1234 7 months ago
Arsenal needs to learn how to cross. If not chamakh's talents will go to waste ):
PokePro97 7 months ago
The problem is that no one in Arsenal is good at crossing. Most of the time it's pass pass pass.
PokePro97 7 months ago
0:37 what the fuck is Rosicky doing?
sg238 7 months ago
We don't need another striker. Rvp first choice, Chamakh will get better next season, and Vela as a backup. We get alot of our goals from midfield anyway.
robinvpersie133 7 months ago
what I want to know is why wenger droped chamakh just becasue van persie was back I mean chami was scoring and in good form he should have done a 4-4-2
apowe110 7 months ago
what song in this video
LabelFossa 7 months ago
@LabelFossa temperature sean paul
pojomon1234 7 months ago
Great player, shame wenger overlooked him due to RVP returning, would be good in a 4 4 2, with chamakh and RVP upfront
KarlVincentt94 7 months ago
Shame he can't score anymore
drfred26 7 months ago
Arsene has to stop buying this players from league 1, their cheep for a reason, he should buy falcao, its going to cost him but its going to be worth it.
EnzoCheLatino 7 months ago
@EnzoCheLatino Ligue 1 has some class players, and usually they're not cheap so i don't know what you're on about. The reason Chamakh was cheap was because he was on a free. Wenger gets the cheap players because he's world class at spotting talent, and he does that from every league, not just France. Look at Sagna, i think about £7mil and he's the most consistent RB in the Premiership.
robinvpersie133 7 months ago
@robinvpersie133 He is not world class at spotting talent otherwise arsenal would have won something by now, he gets 1 signing right every of 10 young players he buys, arsene is prejudice most the player he buys are from league 1, instead of Spanish primera where players are twice as talented.
EnzoCheLatino 7 months ago
@EnzoCheLatino Arsenal have won something, remember the invincible side in 2004? Yeah he hasn't got it right recently, but that's not because he can't spot talent. If a player doesn't reach their potential, he sells them on for a profit - nothing wrong with that. La Liga is the second best league on the planet, but the players arn't the same, most of them get bullied off the ball, even the defenders.
robinvpersie133 7 months ago
@robinvpersie133 La liga is the best league in the planet, and produce the most talented, technically gifted players, which would be perfect for arsenals way of playing football, and they don’t get bullied of the ball, i don’t know what the fuck you are on about. Its better than premier league where there is no tactical order.
EnzoCheLatino 7 months ago
@EnzoCheLatino Most of la liga players are small, and wouldn't fit the premier league. In the league ranking, the premiership is the best in world, that's why I'm saying it. I don't know what you mean by tactical order, but in la liga there are only 2 teams competing to win the league, and that's boring.
robinvpersie133 7 months ago
@robinvpersie133 That is because they are the two best teams in the world, and it doesnt matter if a players is small, a lot of the best players in the world are small.
EnzoCheLatino 7 months ago
@EnzoCheLatino I'm not saying it matters, I'm saying that they don't usually suit the premiership - only the very best do. Real Madrid are not the second best team in the world, not by a long shot.
robinvpersie133 7 months ago
@robinvpersie133 No, then who is, because had real madrid played manchester united in the semi final of champions league there would have been two spanish teams in the final, and we came second in la liga to maybe the best team in history.
EnzoCheLatino 7 months ago
@EnzoCheLatino How do you know Madrid would have beat United? I don't think they would have, you can't prove that. Yeah, but Madrid are the second best in la liga, not the world - that argument doesn't prove anything. I'm bored of this now.
robinvpersie133 7 months ago
@robinvpersie133 Yes we would have, we have better players, recieved less goals in champions league than you, and we scored more, Real madrid is the second best team in the world.
EnzoCheLatino 7 months ago
@EnzoCheLatino I'm not a United fan just to let you know. Stats don't prove anything, performance on the day does.
robinvpersie133 7 months ago
@robinvpersie133 and everything indicates that we would have killed united.
EnzoCheLatino 7 months ago
i would drop chamack from a high place into a team which is not arsenal.
monchandclaxbach 8 months ago
KING OF HEADERS** thumbs sup 1:44 WAS AMAZING
GUNNERZ3788 8 months ago
KING OF HEADERS** thumbs sup
GUNNERZ3788 8 months ago
Wheres the Love button <3
ChamakhI29 8 months ago 4
My Favourite arsenal player
scaprslayer 8 months ago 27
@scaprslayer Mine too!
MrEriko2904 8 months ago
i hope he gets a better chance next season, but i want so see vela given games too, so its a touch choice. I really don't think Arsenal need anymore strikers, just a CB, winger, and a LB if clichy goes
j4m1e23 8 months ago
@j4m1e23 I agree with you! But I think Arsenal can use Gibbs if Clichy leaves :)
MrEriko2904 8 months ago
this is not your video take it down
josevanreyes 8 months ago
@josevanreyes This is my video. Many others has taken it from me
MrEriko2904 8 months ago
@josevanreyes if u want to know whos video is this . check the date/month/year
antabolt 5 months ago
Nice Video ! Chamakh is a great Header , bu i think arsenal isnt the right team for him
TheTouriOne 9 months ago
@TheTouriOne Arsenal is the right team for him, if they change their formation to 4-4-2. Robin Van Persie and Chamakh on top, a technical striker, who can lay cross, and a striker who
is a great header.
MrEriko2904 9 months ago 10
@MrEriko2904 yeah i know that its the right if they change the formation , but i think that Arsene Wenger is getting worse and worse ! how can he put a player like this on the benc , and sometime he dont even call him !
thats why i think that Wenger made a mistake by Buying him .. btw he is Great and deserve to be Official
TheTouriOne 9 months ago
@MrEriko2904 i think then that frmation is very good BUT i will fix better a player who can be the perfect partner for van persie and that's not him
TheAFCRVP10 9 months ago
@MrEriko2904 No,it's not balanced. 4-4-3 is the right formation but with 3 strikers at the front like v.Persie - Chamakh - Walcott (Chamakh in the middle so others can do more cross to him)
arsenalondonorth 9 months ago
@arsenalondonorth I don't think 4-3-3 is the right formation. I don't see van Persie as a winger, but a striker. But Van Persie can play as a left winger, but that's not his favourite position. 4-3-3 is good formation for Arsenal, but I think 4-4-2 is a better formation.
MrEriko2904 9 months ago
@MrEriko2904 Well, if that so Arshavin can play the as the winger or even other. But if only Wenger wants to use Chamakh. If not, otherwise it's v.Persie in the middle.
arsenalondonorth 9 months ago
@arsenalondonorth Correct. Chamakh isn't the first choice for Wenger, and hope he will give Chamakh much more trust than he did on the end of this season.
MrEriko2904 9 months ago
@MrEriko2904 Yes, Chamakh is the first choice when v.Persie is injured. Then, Wenger wil use him.
arsenalondonorth 9 months ago
@MrEriko2904 lm sure you can modify that formation to bring van persie closer and l think its better for him as a right winger, less crossing more dribbling
williams12345679910 8 months ago