Open your eyes, people: this video is a farce, and ignores evidence instead of disproving anything. Those weren't squibs. It's just the air and debris inside the building being compressed to the point that it forces an exit.
Still waiting for answers after all these years from those who think 9/11 was inside job. Of why don't they think other plane crashes and building collapses were inside jobs? As abuse, lies, ducking and weaving and keeping quiet are not answers.
Um..No!! What you are seeing here is the upper floor compressing the air in the building like a gigantic pneumatic ram and forcing that air out areas of least resistance windows etc.
@echizenn808 if you stop wasting name calling and actually spent this time doing research, you would see those who claim 9/11 was inside job, did in fact claim squibs or explosives brought down WTC. Now who is the "fricken idiot"? LOL LOL
those squibs are simply elevators and parts of the floor blowing out from the building. it is basically lika an accordian at that point and air and debris is coming out in differnt places of the building
the theory that the squibs were explosives are bogus because in the area of the "squib" there was no change physically in the structure of the building but however in the example demolitions, when the squibs appear, that part of the structure is destroyed.
America has the most powerful military the world has ever seen and the best intelligence agencies the world has seen and we think some wacko's that live in caves done this?
@MrVoxi25 don't be silly. A lone gunman (nutcase at that) shot President Reagan and almost killed him . Why? Same reason some determined people could hyjack planes and learn to fly. Because we are (were especially) a VERY WiDE OPEN SOCIETY.
America has the most powerful military the world has ever seen and the best intelligence agencies the world has seen and we think some wacko's that live in caves done this?
There are some people who find it extremely hard to grasp that WTC 1, 2, & 7 were brought down by controlled demolition, but the fact remains that they were.
There are also some people who refuse to accept that they're an alcoholic, addicted to drugs, or hooked on gambling, or that their spouse is having an affair, it's called *DENIAL*
**It's a form of insanity**
Any sane folks reading this should check out A&E911truth to get the facts.
A: What drugs are you on? The sustained squirt of dust is clear evidence of pressure inducing it, not an explosion.
B: Would you kill the most important (or any) persons in your country to make it easier go to war, with an enemy you can't beat? -You, dear, should visit the "special" doctor.
Well you beat me with your BA, I wasn't so disciplined then. I have a 3.1 in Public Administration, but a 3.8 in my MA in International Relations and Honor Graduate, also LT in the Army in military intel. 9/11 was done by our shadow govt to usher in the illegal Patriot Act, fund Haliburton with hundreds of billions of dollars with no-bid contracts, and start illegal wars to help conform "rogue" nations into this satanic one world agenda. Whether you believe it or not, its happening.
Okay, you got me beat with the MA, and Army. Couldn't pass the physical.
Got a son who is a Captain, Intel. He is got his BA in Poli Sci. Getting out and going back for MA in International Affairs. But he thinks like me about 911.
Just too out there. Guvmint does some screwed up things, but 911 inside job is just out there.
No revolution as long as people bought it! But that is about to end. There is a 2 part movie short called "The First Day of the Second American Revolution" on youtube. Might be of interest. According to Gerald Celente the revolution is already here. Look at tea parties with millions of people and the news says there is 1,000. Why are they GPSing our front doors during the 2010 census? Why did Bush give orders for the 3rd Infantry Division to patrol inside the US to put down riots 1 OCT 2008?
What I do know is that the "squib" appears right at collapse initiation or slightly before. I think that pretty much rules out a pressure release that far down the structure.
Also, a pressure release through a window in an undamaged part of the building, some forty or so stories below the impact zone, would blow clean air out the window which would not even be visible unless it blew paper or other office contents out making it possible to see the release.
obvious that what we're actually seeing is a jet of smoke and debris from an explosion that takes place out of sequence in that location. Once you come to grips with the fact that is a controlled demolition, (a conclusion based on a preponderance of evidence) it's not a stretch to see this for what it actually is, a telltale sign of controlled demolition.
I doubt if the criminals at NIST even tried to explain this particular squib, they just categorically wrote them off.
I don't think you above look at this properly. First of all, a squib is a much smaller device than what you're making it out to be, poor choice of words from the video maker but I digress. Next can you fathom the pressure in a collapsing building? The "squibs" on the upper floors can actually just be pressure explosions from the floors above. The lower one is not as easily explainable, but is hardly a "smoking gun"! You know nothing of engineering KevinMerck, but I bet you already knew that!
columbus didnt give up on the pope for nothing. when dealing with idiots that cant do math or physics, or just ignore math and physics, then sign them up and ship them out.
At frame 1:03 you see a squib appear right at collapse initiation. (As the demolition sequence begins)
This squib is a *misfire* some 40 or more stories below the demolition sequence that cannot be mistaken for anything but explosives.
This alone is smoking gun evidence and is more than enough justification for a legitimate investigation and is in addition to the virtual mountain of other irrefutable evidence.
Those aren't squibs. Do you have any Idea what is going on in that building?? You cant see it Obviously. The air pressure inside is probably moving between 80- to 120 MPH if not more. what do think that does to window. Its called over pressure...and it happens with out explosives. Take a look at avalanches. The wind in front of an occurring avalanche will pick up people and equipment and throw them before the snow ever gets to them. You can't out run it with the fastest snow machine.
Great to the usual parade of govt shills and sheeple who "just can`t believe" their own govt would kill them for political expediency.They think their fat American asses are so precious and unique that it would be impossible for the rich people to kill them like the fat human cockroaches that they are.
...what the greed for power can provoke in weak leaders... it's just unbelievable. And the fact that the people have been so oblivious to the truth is beyond words.
Are they really Architects and engineers that say this on that link you provided ?
If thats true, than thats great info ! As all the govt believers always say "well who are you to say what happened you are not an engineer ! ''
As if we dont have the common sense to know when we've all been lied to ! But its good to know that we can point to Other engineers who disagree with the "corrupted " engineers who tow the line and bow down to the official story
Yes they do have the power. They had the patience, the time and the money. Most of them were very well educated. Atta had a degree in constructional engineering. He knew how to knock down big buildings. The U.S. just did not do enough to protect the american people. They just didn't take the threats seriously.
People keep telling me these storyes but i dont believe them ive lived in new york my whole life i would never believe the gov't to kill people like that it was a terriorist who deserves to rot in hell for all the people that died
The fact that the buildings collapsed into their footprint is the clearest sign that it was controlled demolition. Its really amazing how people cannot accept that this is not the result of a fire even when presented with evidence.
Building that fall into their own footprint do not cause damage in surrounding areas. It's obvious tha CT idiots don't know what that it is. All 3 collapses caused damage around them. You don't evidence all you have is speculations. Sorry but that is not evidence of anything.
my theory is that the squibs are compressed air escaping through broken windows or weak points as the pressure from the collapsing building is forcing the air out.
It had that wanted kink that demolitions use. Please learn to research before you ask questions without even the want to research. You learn nothing from not researching yourself.
I would say they are markedly different from detonation squibs. The WTC "squibs" shoot out with a stream of constant air. Like hoses. Whereas the demolition squibs explode and the energy dissipates.
Seems to indicate air pressure. And any air-tight seal does not have the strenght to hold back such pressure.
It happens several floors down because of the structure that existed above the collapse. The air that existed up there is forced through the same number of floors.
A collapse is not an explosion. Why were huge pieces of steel wedged deep into the sides of buildings a football field away? A collapse is straight down not outward. You need explosive force to do damage this far away. Study and research before you comment about something you have no idea about. I guess even professionals who build and design these structures are wrong right? Check out Architects for 911 Truth.
Marvin Bush had a 3.8million dollar contract as security ced........Why did they pick these two buildings? They were financial hogs with too many empty offices...They needed to be cleaned up...too much asbestos..and it would cost too much...These buildings were ideal because they were money hogs that did not support themselves...
Another ignorant explanation from ignorant conspiracists who are not qualified to make any judgements regarding physics. Who are your experts? Where are your facts? Do you know what a fact is? No. Any Structural Engineers? No. Any Civil Engineers? No. I rest my case.
thehip2007 this is not ignorant explanation, if anything your explanation was ignorant. If Steven Jones qualifies he could be an expert. Any Structural Engineers you say? Well I typed "wtc engineer goes public" into Google and got an article about one who does not believe official collapse story. Knowing the equation gravitational free fall speed is an example of physics, that is taught in high school's so I think most are qualified to speculate about that too.
Propaganda Mechanics spews false science and unsupportable theories that defy the basic laws of physics. Steel skyscrapers DO NOT COLLAPSE on themselves... EVER! Not even when planes hit them. A steel skyscraper burns until all that's left is the steel structure, IT WILL NOT COLLAPSE. Learn the science, watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, loose change, 911 in plane site, terror storm, money masters <-- in memory of those who perished PLEASE question the official story, tell others.
You know what is never mentioned after the air and air sealed floors? Well and explosion does in fact compress air and this compressed air shooting out is going to seek the easiest way out not a horizontal spout. The building creating the squib through air is a bad straw man that needs to get out of the way.
people are quick to disprove teh conspiracy without ever actually seeing the evidence. It's just too absurd to comprehend for most people. Who wants to believe our own gov did this for insurance and tax money
The film shows the same 2 or 3 "squibs" over and over and tries to con you into believing its lots of different ones.Only people with very low intelligence would be fooled by this stupid clip.
i belive that it was a set up ... they were planning a set up like this 50 years ago.. the wtc buildings were built to withstand a plane crashing into them.. one of the architects actually said that it could of withstood multiple impacts.. in australia a plane flying in their airspace without confirmation would be blown out of the sky by missles that are computer controlled.. and i thought america has the best defense in the world .. but i guess just not on sept.11
You can watch the hour and a half video here on youtube, under 911 mysteries with Dutch subtitles. It seems most comments here are by folks that haven't watched this in it's entirety. The documentary is just asking questions that aren't being answered. I commented on the video with a question mark. It's up to you to decide, that's all. You don't have to believe.
...Who placed the charges and how were they forced to keep quiet about it? Where were the control? How come no one noticed what must have been tens of thousands of feet of primer cord running throughout the building? The conspiracy theorists use words like "squibs" to appear knowledgeable about building demolition, yet they offer no answers to simple questions like these. I guess in a conspiracy, the govt can break any law they wish, including the laws of physics and common sense.
I would love to hear the rest of this theory. How were the charges placed in the building without anyone seeing them? How was it possible to expose the inner core support beams where the shaped charges must have been placed without any of the building's thousands of occupants seeing them? How long did it take for the charges to be placed? Wasn't it necessary to cut through the support beams before placing the shaped charges (as is normally done during a demolition process)? ...
about 8 months before 911 the ownership of both the trade center towers and building 7 was transfered from our 99 year lease to the same guy who designed the technique that took down the remains of the Oklahoma building years earlier, he developed a way to make the building collapse in such a way that the steel would come apart in nice neat sections, perfectly sized to be carted away on flatbed trailers, basically he figured out how to "shatter" a building. look it up.
Thats exactly what happened, the remains were driven off and shipped to CHINA before we could examine them. And there is recorded evidence that he was the same individual who said "Pull it" in reference to building 7 right before it came down, you are right, they need to take massive amounts of time to arange it,
not to mention the demolition of years and years of evidence regarding whatever illegal business deals that have been going on behind closed doors, oh and yeah, didn't Bush want to finish his daddies job? well he needed a scared nation to get congress to roll over and look the other way as our rights were eliminated by patriot act one and two.
there are so many other things that went on right in front of our eyes and we didn't even see it. its going on today in other parts of the world. Read between the lines when watching the nightly news, they don't tell the whole truth, and when they do, the motives behind what "they" do are different from what we are led to believe. open your eyes America!
A technique to bring a blding down in neat sections wld involve cutting or placing charges on beams at key locations. Beams are not exposed so walls would need to be opened and concrete removed. The towers were ~1300 ft, that would = ~ 25 cuts/charges on each verticle beam in the tower. X2 towers. All with out being detected. If CDI had another way of bringing down a buidling I'm sure they would tell about on their website. Unless that technique is reserved for the 'special' customers...
Also there were explosions heard if you watch the whole documentary, prior to the buildings collapse. One of the explosions was videotaped in the lobby. You don't see it but you hear it as firefighters run out.
"The great thing about all of you nutcases CT's is that in this you we can keep you all in one place instead of spread out. DUHHHH. When a building like is is collaping, you would TOTALLY expect air pressure to increase as the building was squeezed downward. My degree is in civil engineering, not fantasy."
Well proper grammer definitely isn't your strong suit.
The thing about squibs in demolition is that they form on the top part of the fallin building. Squibs are not explosions like the video states. in a demolition you dont destroy the outter walls or the building would fall outward. 911 was obviously a tragedy but in no way a conspiracy. The main reason for the squibs before the building seems to fall in is because the inside of the building was falling fast then you can see.
It came down at near free fall speed because there were pressure outlets created by the intense heat/weight/volume of the structure. Thus, the squibs were naturally occurring, NOT from secondary detonations. All large buildings have ventilation ports to the outside of the building at various locations. Think of all that air being compressed in the internal duct work, inevitably it will overcome the one way vent door and blow outward.
answer these three questions then smart guy, why were both planes pointed directly at building 7 right behind the tower it hit? second, why was building 7 "Pulled" when multiple fire departments were on hand to put out the "Massive" blaze supposedly eating it up, and three, how does a building made primarily of steel collapse from a fire that was burning itself out, the smoke is WHITE! NEVER IN AMERICAN OR ANY OTHER COUNTRIES HISTORY HAS A SKYSCRAPER COLAPSED FROM FIRE.
Why do you accept the fact that destroying key support beams with small explosions would bring down a skyscraper but destroying several of theose beams with one large exposion could not?
If the second plane was locked on to some tracking device in Building 7 why didn't it achieve level flight and fly straight into the tower instead of turning and banking at the last seconds to slam into the tower. (When ever you take control of an airplane, auto pilot is automatically disabled.) It was NOT locked onto a homing beacon, it WAS in the control of a Homicidal Muslim BASTARD who only cared about fucking 70 virgins when he died attacking "the great satan".
that there is the key to the humanity involved, if I were a dumbfuck pilot dropout I would be told to get the plane near enough to the right heading and location, and at the last moment activate the tracking device to make the proper hit count.
I'm not sure what you are implying by the statement "why were both planes pointed directly at building 7". The first plane hit the north tower on the north face, passing above and to the west of bldg 7. The second plane hit the south face of the south tower, on path that was pointing to bldg 7. Are you saying that bldg 7 was the intended target?
I am suggesting that at the last moment when the planes did their acrobatic last ditch corrections the autopilot locked on to the homing beacon planted in the 27th floor of building 7 where the owner of all three had previously that year (public records verify) been renovated with an anti-terrorism bomb proof control center, damn, people only read what they want to read.
look up the owner of those three buildings, he also ran the company that blew up the remains of the Oaklahoma City bombed building, in the process developing a way to bring down buildings by shattering them in such a way as to make the I beams come apart in nice neat 50-something foot lengths so they can be loaded on flat bed trailers and be carted away, does anyone know another reason why the entire structure was able to be sent to China in such a friggin hurry?
Exactly how long did it take for the "entire structure" to be sent to China? Do you have some dates as to when the process started and when it finished?
wow, and a casual glance at any of the reference links at the bottom says more, I can totally imagine that the Mafia would be working with people wanting to hide or cover up evidence of large scale corruption and consp i r acy... They would never tell where they got it, and how are you going to track laundered money funneled into numbered accounts of ... hmmmm, possibly the same individual who owned the buildings in the first place? anythings possible at that point.
oh yeah, the guy who basically bought our World Trade Center out from under our nozes, (we had a 99 year lease, and by we I mean WE THE PEOPLE) his name is Silverstein, friggin jews, just kidding! I am half Jewish... lol
I researched all this as it was happening once upon a time and all of the links and video stuff off of google video are dead by now, wonder why? anyways, I am not going to re-research it all for you, its all out there somewhere still, this video is one of the ones that I saw way back then and I thought I would do my part to spread the word, there are other videos and such that show a top down view of the last moments before each plane hit,
and they clearly show the flightpath changing so that its final attitude would be aimed at Building 7. thats all I am saying. the 2 main WTC buildings may have fallen due to gravity, I won't deny that, but the events before and after are all EXTREMELY SUSPICIOUS and they all corroborate and make sense when looked at from this point of view, step by step it all makes sense.
I want to make one minor correction as my info was slightly off possibly from memory faults (happens to everyone) the buildings were Leased by Larry Silverstiein and the demolitions crew was simply the same in both the Oklahoma City bombings and 911,
namely Controlled Demolition Group LLC (directly worked with DOD for half a century almost) They were the first contractors on the scene and presumably the ones who took down building 7 when Larry Silverstein said to "pull it", other than that I can't find any connections.
interestingly enough though, even though even big time news agencies say that CDG took down the remains of the Oklahoma city bombing and cleaned up after 911, on their own web site, they don't take credit for either, just a slew of other fully planned demolitions. hmmmmmmm
in the end, we know Bush and everyone else in office lies as their actions in various other completely unrelated items (yet mostly peripherally related) show this, and what better way than to mix truth and lies to make the lie even more believable? I for one did not and will not vote for any incumbent until I see big changes in the way things are handled, democrat or republican included.
and doesn't direcly lead you into believing things one way or another by telling you what they believe on a particular subject aren't conspiracy theorists in the conventional sense... I myself filter out alot of blatant posturing and leading statements because, among the "conspiracy theorists" are a large number of "Disinformation Plants" acting the part in order to be debunked. So don't follow me, follow the facts. isn't it interesting that hard solid facts are so hard to come by regarding 911?
Most of the links I followed on 911 Research just linked to more pages on that site. They may have titles like 'Chapter 2 of FEMA's report' but the link opens a page on 911 Research. A link to the actual FEMA site would be credible. Links to your own site are questionable.
heheh, unfortunately youtube doesnt allow editing of ones own comments, I started reading things that screamed conspiracy theory, but I maintain that any site that can show their research by links that are credible, (continued)
You mean you began quoting sources as truth before actually investigating the sources? Now I'm starting to doubt some of your facts. You almost had me convinced. :)
I only started looking for sources again today because I knew this would come up in this rather 1 way conversation. Most of the stuff I have said I watched transpire thru the news media and Google news day after day, I actually watched the stories unfold almost moment to moment by hitting refresh and checking Google news practically hourly, (continued)
being a Google News (-aholic?)hound, I see everything from so many viewpoints its not even funny, there is no way I can remember all the sources that gave me this viewpoint... the world moved on and so did I
and thats what THEY wanted us to do!! LOL but really, it has been a very ... scripted way the current administration and DOD has handled the conspiracy theorists. putting out little pieces of info that make the Con Theory guys say one thing, then putting out another piece that was held back just so (ok I'll admit it) WE have egg on our faces.
in any case, I'm not here to convince you, the powers that be have already convinced you and most people of their version, I am here to ask the questions that cause you and others to second guess the official story, I am certainly not convinced
and like I said once before, it very easily could have been gravity that brought them down, especially the Firemans accounts I have read just recently about a 20 story large hole in building 7, but the before and after... and especially the Pentagon side of the story doesn't leave any doubts in my mind that it was aranged, allowed and
Ok... Are you crazy? 20 story large hole in building 7? Have you seen the videos just before the collapse? All angles? There is just not enough fires to bring it down. And no holes!!! You think the 3 buildings WTC 1, 2, and 7 all just happened to fall the same way?
Look at the Madrid building. It didn't collapse when there were flames huge that covered the whole building. Building 7 hardly had any, and you are saying that fire made building 7 fall?
pulled off by our government, for instance, where were our military aircraft on 911? off over Canada doing War games. that and so much more makes the pit in my stomach say there are a bunch of dirty rats in government.
nevermind my almost wavering faith in the above theory of "Squibs"... although the generic term for blasting caps was used, they are obviously refering to the use of explosives to take down the buildings. this clip is only part of a larger clip, you have to watch that, this is taken way out of context here.
you know, PkofPk and that nagging debunking911 dot com thing right below our thread made me eat my words and check it out, it has some very interesting things to say about at least one of the towers colapse,
Pressure had to cause resistance and it should have taken a little more time to hit bottom and the heat weeks after they fell?? Building "7"? Pulled, how much time and preparation does it take to set charges on a building before it is pulled??? Why didn't the other buildings in the area that were alot older Fall?
I'm sorry but there are to many unanswered questions. I still think it had help comming down. Whom I don't know.
King: "It came down at near free fall speed because there were pressure outlets created by the intense heat/weight/volume of the structure. "
False. The squibs were as far as 30 stories below, way ahead of the demolition wave. And 2, the WTC floors were hermetically sealed (air tight), so there wouldn't be pressure transfer anyways.
Because the WTC was hermetically sealed, any pressure would simply shoot out at the point of the demolition collapse-wave. It wouldn't happen 30 stories below as in the case of the WTC squibs.
The great thing about all of you nutcases CT's is that in this you we can keep you all in one place instead of spread out. DUHHHH. When a building like is is collaping, you would TOTALLY expect air pressure to increase as the building was squeezed downward. My degree is in civil engineering, not fantasy.
Open your eyes, people: this video is a farce, and ignores evidence instead of disproving anything. Those weren't squibs. It's just the air and debris inside the building being compressed to the point that it forces an exit.
MrYib 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oh I'm sorry echizenn808, how many times do I have to repeat myself before you grasp reality?
aussiekwv 5 months ago
Still waiting for answers after all these years from those who think 9/11 was inside job. Of why don't they think other plane crashes and building collapses were inside jobs? As abuse, lies, ducking and weaving and keeping quiet are not answers.
aussiekwv 5 months ago
This is part of a full non bs documentary aoub the truth of 911 based on facts.
This show was made by people who're not lazy ,clueless asses like you.
echizenn808 5 months ago
What complete and utter bullshit.
thegoodlocust 10 months ago
Um..No!! What you are seeing here is the upper floor compressing the air in the building like a gigantic pneumatic ram and forcing that air out areas of least resistance windows etc.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
VERDADERA DEMILICION.
getx7 1 year ago
@aussiekw
Who you calling weak you little fool?
Boonetube 1 year ago
@Boonetube who are you calling a fool? Yourself?
aussiekwv 5 months ago
Your claims that the buildings was brought down by Squibs, was answered and proven to be false so why are you so weak not to accept this fact??
aussiekwv 1 year ago
@aussiekwv lmao, what an idiot, I bet you dont even get what a squib is ...sigh...
Or maybe youve never known of demolitions?
lol maybe you should study then watch the full documentary (911 mysteries).
echizenn808 5 months ago
@echizenn808 maybe you should do a check of your spelling, grammar and facts first? As all I seen is bad spelling, grammar and false claims.
aussiekwv 5 months ago
@echizenn808 reading your own rants, I don't bet I know you are not willing to accept reality WTC WAS NOT brought down by squibs.
aussiekwv 5 months ago
@aussiekwv lmao, fool youre way off.
Theyre not saying squibs brought it down, squibs are from the demolition language, from explosives.
fricken idiot.
Its an effect of the explosions. Many factors contributed to the collapse.
echizenn808 5 months ago
@echizenn808 if you stop wasting name calling and actually spent this time doing research, you would see those who claim 9/11 was inside job, did in fact claim squibs or explosives brought down WTC. Now who is the "fricken idiot"? LOL LOL
aussiekwv 5 months ago
those squibs are simply elevators and parts of the floor blowing out from the building. it is basically lika an accordian at that point and air and debris is coming out in differnt places of the building
mrants11 1 year ago
@mrants11 sure they are and buildings fell beacuse of jet fuel right ?
zip68 1 year ago
@mrants11 yeh sure, parts of air and debris are coming out in a spray kind shape in one particular very small area sure.
A pancake collapse wouldve trapped everything inside instead.
echizenn808 5 months ago
the theory that the squibs were explosives are bogus because in the area of the "squib" there was no change physically in the structure of the building but however in the example demolitions, when the squibs appear, that part of the structure is destroyed.
mrants11 1 year ago
exelent video
mjprince7 1 year ago
WTF they(cia)killed Kennedy,you think they give a shit about some suits in an office?
metalbagger2012 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11= FALSE FLAG OP
Skipper1177 1 year ago
America has the most powerful military the world has ever seen and the best intelligence agencies the world has seen and we think some wacko's that live in caves done this?
MrVoxi25 1 year ago
@MrVoxi25 don't be silly. A lone gunman (nutcase at that) shot President Reagan and almost killed him . Why? Same reason some determined people could hyjack planes and learn to fly. Because we are (were especially) a VERY WiDE OPEN SOCIETY.
robi2000 1 year ago
America has the most powerful military the world has ever seen and the best intelligence agencies the world has seen and we think some wacko's that live in caves done this?
MrVoxi25 1 year ago
Every American should watch 9/11 Mysteries, period.
AIexKidd 1 year ago
There are some people who find it extremely hard to grasp that WTC 1, 2, & 7 were brought down by controlled demolition, but the fact remains that they were.
There are also some people who refuse to accept that they're an alcoholic, addicted to drugs, or hooked on gambling, or that their spouse is having an affair, it's called *DENIAL*
**It's a form of insanity**
Any sane folks reading this should check out A&E911truth to get the facts.
KevinMerck 1 year ago 10
A: What drugs are you on? The sustained squirt of dust is clear evidence of pressure inducing it, not an explosion.
B: Would you kill the most important (or any) persons in your country to make it easier go to war, with an enemy you can't beat? -You, dear, should visit the "special" doctor.
TheResponding 1 year ago
Google "Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC"
WTCnucleardemolition 2 years ago
This video shows a squib forty or more stories below the debris field when it first appears.
The squib appears right at *demolition initiation* which is clearly visible at 1:03.
The squib appears right as the building begins to collapse. I think its fair to say that this is an out-of-sequence explosion in that location.
Support a legitimate investigation.
KevinMerck 2 years ago
This is a comedy right?
How can you look in the internals of this building? You don't know what is going on inside the structure causing the internal blowouts.
Better go get somemore tin foil, you need more hats to hand out.
sandwichh 2 years ago
@sandwichh: How did going to a public school work out for you?
nitdiver5 2 years ago
Not too bad.
Neither was college. 3.71 GPA.
How did hamburger U work for you?
sandwichh 2 years ago
Well you beat me with your BA, I wasn't so disciplined then. I have a 3.1 in Public Administration, but a 3.8 in my MA in International Relations and Honor Graduate, also LT in the Army in military intel. 9/11 was done by our shadow govt to usher in the illegal Patriot Act, fund Haliburton with hundreds of billions of dollars with no-bid contracts, and start illegal wars to help conform "rogue" nations into this satanic one world agenda. Whether you believe it or not, its happening.
nitdiver5 2 years ago
Okay, you got me beat with the MA, and Army. Couldn't pass the physical.
Got a son who is a Captain, Intel. He is got his BA in Poli Sci. Getting out and going back for MA in International Affairs. But he thinks like me about 911.
Just too out there. Guvmint does some screwed up things, but 911 inside job is just out there.
sandwichh 2 years ago
Comment removed
nitdiver5 2 years ago
Yep. Got a friend that is in all this stuff. That is how I got here, he sent it to me.
I can listen to some of Alex Jones. He has some good stuff, then he gets out there. Don't buy chemtrails either.
Climate gate I totally buy. Have family history in Masons so don't buy the stuff tied to them.
USS Liberty should have been acted on.
Like I said, guvmint has done some things, just if all this was true you know what kind of revolution would go on.
sandwichh 2 years ago
No revolution as long as people bought it! But that is about to end. There is a 2 part movie short called "The First Day of the Second American Revolution" on youtube. Might be of interest. According to Gerald Celente the revolution is already here. Look at tea parties with millions of people and the news says there is 1,000. Why are they GPSing our front doors during the 2010 census? Why did Bush give orders for the 3rd Infantry Division to patrol inside the US to put down riots 1 OCT 2008?
nitdiver5 2 years ago
What I do know is that the "squib" appears right at collapse initiation or slightly before. I think that pretty much rules out a pressure release that far down the structure.
Also, a pressure release through a window in an undamaged part of the building, some forty or so stories below the impact zone, would blow clean air out the window which would not even be visible unless it blew paper or other office contents out making it possible to see the release.
I think it's fairly ...
KevinMerck 2 years ago
obvious that what we're actually seeing is a jet of smoke and debris from an explosion that takes place out of sequence in that location. Once you come to grips with the fact that is a controlled demolition, (a conclusion based on a preponderance of evidence) it's not a stretch to see this for what it actually is, a telltale sign of controlled demolition.
I doubt if the criminals at NIST even tried to explain this particular squib, they just categorically wrote them off.
KevinMerck 2 years ago
I don't think you above look at this properly. First of all, a squib is a much smaller device than what you're making it out to be, poor choice of words from the video maker but I digress. Next can you fathom the pressure in a collapsing building? The "squibs" on the upper floors can actually just be pressure explosions from the floors above. The lower one is not as easily explainable, but is hardly a "smoking gun"! You know nothing of engineering KevinMerck, but I bet you already knew that!
jeffinnh1 2 years ago
columbus didnt give up on the pope for nothing. when dealing with idiots that cant do math or physics, or just ignore math and physics, then sign them up and ship them out.
oneshotal 2 years ago
At frame 1:03 you see a squib appear right at collapse initiation. (As the demolition sequence begins)
This squib is a *misfire* some 40 or more stories below the demolition sequence that cannot be mistaken for anything but explosives.
This alone is smoking gun evidence and is more than enough justification for a legitimate investigation and is in addition to the virtual mountain of other irrefutable evidence.
Check out A&E for 9/11 Truth to get the facts.
KevinMerck 2 years ago
"At frame 1:03 you see a squib appear right at collapse initiation ... This ... cannot be mistaken for anything but explosives."
Can you cite any demolition experts - which, I'm guessing, does not include you - who agree with this statement?
TimReed22222 2 years ago
Those aren't squibs. Do you have any Idea what is going on in that building?? You cant see it Obviously. The air pressure inside is probably moving between 80- to 120 MPH if not more. what do think that does to window. Its called over pressure...and it happens with out explosives. Take a look at avalanches. The wind in front of an occurring avalanche will pick up people and equipment and throw them before the snow ever gets to them. You can't out run it with the fastest snow machine.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
Americasfan you are a retard if you believe arabs suspended the law of physics and penetrated US Military on 911
atta was on the cia payroll
go back to sleep and keep dreaming in la la land.
Gwenlj 2 years ago 6
Great to the usual parade of govt shills and sheeple who "just can`t believe" their own govt would kill them for political expediency.They think their fat American asses are so precious and unique that it would be impossible for the rich people to kill them like the fat human cockroaches that they are.
VanoPitersky 2 years ago 2
check out the video
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
ACEBAKER911 2 years ago
Comment removed
Daniazco 2 years ago
...what the greed for power can provoke in weak leaders... it's just unbelievable. And the fact that the people have been so oblivious to the truth is beyond words.
zelikris 3 years ago
500+ Architects & Engineers certify the explosives destroyed the World Trade Center.
AE911Truth (dot) org
bofors7715 3 years ago 2
bofors
Are they really Architects and engineers that say this on that link you provided ?
If thats true, than thats great info ! As all the govt believers always say "well who are you to say what happened you are not an engineer ! ''
As if we dont have the common sense to know when we've all been lied to ! But its good to know that we can point to Other engineers who disagree with the "corrupted " engineers who tow the line and bow down to the official story
RawVegan0 3 years ago
What is name of the Song ??
skswat13 3 years ago
i think arabs does not have the power or expeirnce to make
torero131 3 years ago
Yes they do have the power. They had the patience, the time and the money. Most of them were very well educated. Atta had a degree in constructional engineering. He knew how to knock down big buildings. The U.S. just did not do enough to protect the american people. They just didn't take the threats seriously.
AmericasFan 3 years ago
People keep telling me these storyes but i dont believe them ive lived in new york my whole life i would never believe the gov't to kill people like that it was a terriorist who deserves to rot in hell for all the people that died
911 is a day i will never forget <3
Angggg16 3 years ago
The fact that the buildings collapsed into their footprint is the clearest sign that it was controlled demolition. Its really amazing how people cannot accept that this is not the result of a fire even when presented with evidence.
Dollierot06 3 years ago
Building that fall into their own footprint do not cause damage in surrounding areas. It's obvious tha CT idiots don't know what that it is. All 3 collapses caused damage around them. You don't evidence all you have is speculations. Sorry but that is not evidence of anything.
AmericasFan 3 years ago
Bull is dead right!
Watch at 16 seconds onwards in slow motion - half speed! You can easily see the bright explosions moving down the blast wave front!
Fucking totally obvious you knuckle head abrown532!
Both buildings were blown to fuck!
Maybe you can explain why they found all those tiny bone fragments on the deutche bank buiding roof too?
WAKE UP MAN - damn!
chumbawomba 3 years ago 2
bull
Magicman500123 3 years ago
my theory is that the squibs are compressed air escaping through broken windows or weak points as the pressure from the collapsing building is forcing the air out.
abrown532 3 years ago
world trade center 7 did not get hit by a plane check out:
Controlled demolition of the Philips building - in Oslo
compare!
1GRRRR 3 years ago
did building 7 have squibs?
abrown532 3 years ago
It had that wanted kink that demolitions use. Please learn to research before you ask questions without even the want to research. You learn nothing from not researching yourself.
bradwjensen 3 years ago
Yes WTC 7 had squibs.
bofors7715 3 years ago
Also the squibs do not appear to be in locations that would be integral to the stucture.
pbcinla 4 years ago
I would say they are markedly different from detonation squibs. The WTC "squibs" shoot out with a stream of constant air. Like hoses. Whereas the demolition squibs explode and the energy dissipates.
Seems to indicate air pressure. And any air-tight seal does not have the strenght to hold back such pressure.
It happens several floors down because of the structure that existed above the collapse. The air that existed up there is forced through the same number of floors.
Just my thoughts.
pbcinla 4 years ago 2
oh my fuckyn god.. that is terrible.. i must cry again ,(
N15M07 4 years ago 3
agreed.
xxnolan60 4 years ago
911 was an inside job!
A collapse is not an explosion. Why were huge pieces of steel wedged deep into the sides of buildings a football field away? A collapse is straight down not outward. You need explosive force to do damage this far away. Study and research before you comment about something you have no idea about. I guess even professionals who build and design these structures are wrong right? Check out Architects for 911 Truth.
ae911truth dot org
drcorrector 4 years ago
Marvin Bush had a 3.8million dollar contract as security ced........Why did they pick these two buildings? They were financial hogs with too many empty offices...They needed to be cleaned up...too much asbestos..and it would cost too much...These buildings were ideal because they were money hogs that did not support themselves...
PennyPatti 4 years ago
Another ignorant explanation from ignorant conspiracists who are not qualified to make any judgements regarding physics. Who are your experts? Where are your facts? Do you know what a fact is? No. Any Structural Engineers? No. Any Civil Engineers? No. I rest my case.
thehip2007 4 years ago
thehip2007 this is not ignorant explanation, if anything your explanation was ignorant. If Steven Jones qualifies he could be an expert. Any Structural Engineers you say? Well I typed "wtc engineer goes public" into Google and got an article about one who does not believe official collapse story. Knowing the equation gravitational free fall speed is an example of physics, that is taught in high school's so I think most are qualified to speculate about that too.
SpicyRy4n 4 years ago
Whoever beieves in this Rosie ODonnel theory, I have some ocean front property in Arizona that I'll sell you.
dfwtexxaas 4 years ago
its not her theory. its a possibility that she believes in, along with millions of other people
anaskewview 4 years ago
Propaganda Mechanics spews false science and unsupportable theories that defy the basic laws of physics. Steel skyscrapers DO NOT COLLAPSE on themselves... EVER! Not even when planes hit them. A steel skyscraper burns until all that's left is the steel structure, IT WILL NOT COLLAPSE. Learn the science, watch --> 911 mysteries, ultimate con trailer, loose change, 911 in plane site, terror storm, money masters <-- in memory of those who perished PLEASE question the official story, tell others.
bbruhwiler8 4 years ago
those squibs is just the air trying to escape because of the collapsing building. that air wave could take a lot of dirt with it.
darylgreat 4 years ago
You know what is never mentioned after the air and air sealed floors? Well and explosion does in fact compress air and this compressed air shooting out is going to seek the easiest way out not a horizontal spout. The building creating the squib through air is a bad straw man that needs to get out of the way.
SpicyRy4n 4 years ago
people are quick to disprove teh conspiracy without ever actually seeing the evidence. It's just too absurd to comprehend for most people. Who wants to believe our own gov did this for insurance and tax money
stracinsrt4 4 years ago 2
The film shows the same 2 or 3 "squibs" over and over and tries to con you into believing its lots of different ones.Only people with very low intelligence would be fooled by this stupid clip.
sovereign777 4 years ago
My Friends... We all know why 9/11 took place, we all know how it happened, and we all know how it didn't happen. All we need now is a revolution!
"Freedom that is taken can be taken back..
Freedom that is surrendered is lost forever!"
VoiceOfCommonSense 5 years ago
Too many questions and no answers. Something's brewing.
mouzouki 5 years ago
i belive that it was a set up ... they were planning a set up like this 50 years ago.. the wtc buildings were built to withstand a plane crashing into them.. one of the architects actually said that it could of withstood multiple impacts.. in australia a plane flying in their airspace without confirmation would be blown out of the sky by missles that are computer controlled.. and i thought america has the best defense in the world .. but i guess just not on sept.11
cmacbrown 5 years ago
You can watch the hour and a half video here on youtube, under 911 mysteries with Dutch subtitles. It seems most comments here are by folks that haven't watched this in it's entirety. The documentary is just asking questions that aren't being answered. I commented on the video with a question mark. It's up to you to decide, that's all. You don't have to believe.
Boonetube 5 years ago
So one window blowing out on an open floor concept tower equates to the idea of "squibs" being used? What a load of BS.
Squibs by the way are what set off the charge not the explosion itself. Another video fraught with inaccuracies and lies.
Bluetooht 5 years ago
It's called pressure. I'm not an engineer but this is common sense folks.
redviper101 5 years ago
...Who placed the charges and how were they forced to keep quiet about it? Where were the control? How come no one noticed what must have been tens of thousands of feet of primer cord running throughout the building? The conspiracy theorists use words like "squibs" to appear knowledgeable about building demolition, yet they offer no answers to simple questions like these. I guess in a conspiracy, the govt can break any law they wish, including the laws of physics and common sense.
agr2500 5 years ago
I would love to hear the rest of this theory. How were the charges placed in the building without anyone seeing them? How was it possible to expose the inner core support beams where the shaped charges must have been placed without any of the building's thousands of occupants seeing them? How long did it take for the charges to be placed? Wasn't it necessary to cut through the support beams before placing the shaped charges (as is normally done during a demolition process)? ...
agr2500 5 years ago
about 8 months before 911 the ownership of both the trade center towers and building 7 was transfered from our 99 year lease to the same guy who designed the technique that took down the remains of the Oklahoma building years earlier, he developed a way to make the building collapse in such a way that the steel would come apart in nice neat sections, perfectly sized to be carted away on flatbed trailers, basically he figured out how to "shatter" a building. look it up.
angus4321 5 years ago
Thats exactly what happened, the remains were driven off and shipped to CHINA before we could examine them. And there is recorded evidence that he was the same individual who said "Pull it" in reference to building 7 right before it came down, you are right, they need to take massive amounts of time to arange it,
angus4321 5 years ago
not to mention the demolition of years and years of evidence regarding whatever illegal business deals that have been going on behind closed doors, oh and yeah, didn't Bush want to finish his daddies job? well he needed a scared nation to get congress to roll over and look the other way as our rights were eliminated by patriot act one and two.
angus4321 5 years ago
well he had the chance, the time, and the motive, INSURANCE.
angus4321 5 years ago
there are so many other things that went on right in front of our eyes and we didn't even see it. its going on today in other parts of the world. Read between the lines when watching the nightly news, they don't tell the whole truth, and when they do, the motives behind what "they" do are different from what we are led to believe. open your eyes America!
angus4321 5 years ago
I wonder if he had those pieces of steel ironed and folded before they were carted away on flat bed trailers?
Bluetooht 5 years ago
A technique to bring a blding down in neat sections wld involve cutting or placing charges on beams at key locations. Beams are not exposed so walls would need to be opened and concrete removed. The towers were ~1300 ft, that would = ~ 25 cuts/charges on each verticle beam in the tower. X2 towers. All with out being detected. If CDI had another way of bringing down a buidling I'm sure they would tell about on their website. Unless that technique is reserved for the 'special' customers...
agr2500 5 years ago
Also there were explosions heard if you watch the whole documentary, prior to the buildings collapse. One of the explosions was videotaped in the lobby. You don't see it but you hear it as firefighters run out.
Boonetube 5 years ago
"The great thing about all of you nutcases CT's is that in this you we can keep you all in one place instead of spread out. DUHHHH. When a building like is is collaping, you would TOTALLY expect air pressure to increase as the building was squeezed downward. My degree is in civil engineering, not fantasy."
Well proper grammer definitely isn't your strong suit.
Boonetube 5 years ago
christ that video is so full of sh*t.
haardo 5 years ago
The thing about squibs in demolition is that they form on the top part of the fallin building. Squibs are not explosions like the video states. in a demolition you dont destroy the outter walls or the building would fall outward. 911 was obviously a tragedy but in no way a conspiracy. The main reason for the squibs before the building seems to fall in is because the inside of the building was falling fast then you can see.
demibolt 5 years ago
debunking911 dot com
911myths dot com
PkofPk 5 years ago
daytradeaz; can you tell me about the time it toke to collapse? if air pressure increased as it fell. Why did it come down almost at free fall speed?
olmosm1 5 years ago
It came down at near free fall speed because there were pressure outlets created by the intense heat/weight/volume of the structure. Thus, the squibs were naturally occurring, NOT from secondary detonations. All large buildings have ventilation ports to the outside of the building at various locations. Think of all that air being compressed in the internal duct work, inevitably it will overcome the one way vent door and blow outward.
KingCobra33 5 years ago
answer these three questions then smart guy, why were both planes pointed directly at building 7 right behind the tower it hit? second, why was building 7 "Pulled" when multiple fire departments were on hand to put out the "Massive" blaze supposedly eating it up, and three, how does a building made primarily of steel collapse from a fire that was burning itself out, the smoke is WHITE! NEVER IN AMERICAN OR ANY OTHER COUNTRIES HISTORY HAS A SKYSCRAPER COLAPSED FROM FIRE.
angus4321 5 years ago
It wasn't just fire. It was the impact of the jet liner, the destruction of support beams and the weakening of other support beams.
agr2500 5 years ago
Why do you accept the fact that destroying key support beams with small explosions would bring down a skyscraper but destroying several of theose beams with one large exposion could not?
agr2500 5 years ago
If the second plane was locked on to some tracking device in Building 7 why didn't it achieve level flight and fly straight into the tower instead of turning and banking at the last seconds to slam into the tower. (When ever you take control of an airplane, auto pilot is automatically disabled.) It was NOT locked onto a homing beacon, it WAS in the control of a Homicidal Muslim BASTARD who only cared about fucking 70 virgins when he died attacking "the great satan".
KingCobra33 5 years ago
This is why Islam should not be tolerated because of their Intolerance of the rest of the world. Its a war of good vs. evil.
KingCobra33 5 years ago
that there is the key to the humanity involved, if I were a dumbfuck pilot dropout I would be told to get the plane near enough to the right heading and location, and at the last moment activate the tracking device to make the proper hit count.
angus4321 5 years ago
I'm not sure what you are implying by the statement "why were both planes pointed directly at building 7". The first plane hit the north tower on the north face, passing above and to the west of bldg 7. The second plane hit the south face of the south tower, on path that was pointing to bldg 7. Are you saying that bldg 7 was the intended target?
agr2500 5 years ago
I am suggesting that at the last moment when the planes did their acrobatic last ditch corrections the autopilot locked on to the homing beacon planted in the 27th floor of building 7 where the owner of all three had previously that year (public records verify) been renovated with an anti-terrorism bomb proof control center, damn, people only read what they want to read.
angus4321 5 years ago
look up the owner of those three buildings, he also ran the company that blew up the remains of the Oaklahoma City bombed building, in the process developing a way to bring down buildings by shattering them in such a way as to make the I beams come apart in nice neat 50-something foot lengths so they can be loaded on flat bed trailers and be carted away, does anyone know another reason why the entire structure was able to be sent to China in such a friggin hurry?
angus4321 5 years ago
Exactly how long did it take for the "entire structure" to be sent to China? Do you have some dates as to when the process started and when it finished?
agr2500 5 years ago
wow, and a casual glance at any of the reference links at the bottom says more, I can totally imagine that the Mafia would be working with people wanting to hide or cover up evidence of large scale corruption and consp i r acy... They would never tell where they got it, and how are you going to track laundered money funneled into numbered accounts of ... hmmmm, possibly the same individual who owned the buildings in the first place? anythings possible at that point.
angus4321 5 years ago
oh yeah, the guy who basically bought our World Trade Center out from under our nozes, (we had a 99 year lease, and by we I mean WE THE PEOPLE) his name is Silverstein, friggin jews, just kidding! I am half Jewish... lol
angus4321 5 years ago
I researched all this as it was happening once upon a time and all of the links and video stuff off of google video are dead by now, wonder why? anyways, I am not going to re-research it all for you, its all out there somewhere still, this video is one of the ones that I saw way back then and I thought I would do my part to spread the word, there are other videos and such that show a top down view of the last moments before each plane hit,
angus4321 5 years ago
and they clearly show the flightpath changing so that its final attitude would be aimed at Building 7. thats all I am saying. the 2 main WTC buildings may have fallen due to gravity, I won't deny that, but the events before and after are all EXTREMELY SUSPICIOUS and they all corroborate and make sense when looked at from this point of view, step by step it all makes sense.
angus4321 5 years ago
it looks like youtube isn't letting my comments with links show up, just do a google search for
911 "world trade center" shipped to china
and pick the second link down, its a whole site with everything and more, they are not conspiracy theorists, just documentarians... 911 research
angus4321 5 years ago
I want to make one minor correction as my info was slightly off possibly from memory faults (happens to everyone) the buildings were Leased by Larry Silverstiein and the demolitions crew was simply the same in both the Oklahoma City bombings and 911,
angus4321 5 years ago
namely Controlled Demolition Group LLC (directly worked with DOD for half a century almost) They were the first contractors on the scene and presumably the ones who took down building 7 when Larry Silverstein said to "pull it", other than that I can't find any connections.
angus4321 5 years ago
interestingly enough though, even though even big time news agencies say that CDG took down the remains of the Oklahoma city bombing and cleaned up after 911, on their own web site, they don't take credit for either, just a slew of other fully planned demolitions. hmmmmmmm
angus4321 5 years ago
in the end, we know Bush and everyone else in office lies as their actions in various other completely unrelated items (yet mostly peripherally related) show this, and what better way than to mix truth and lies to make the lie even more believable? I for one did not and will not vote for any incumbent until I see big changes in the way things are handled, democrat or republican included.
angus4321 5 years ago
and doesn't direcly lead you into believing things one way or another by telling you what they believe on a particular subject aren't conspiracy theorists in the conventional sense... I myself filter out alot of blatant posturing and leading statements because, among the "conspiracy theorists" are a large number of "Disinformation Plants" acting the part in order to be debunked. So don't follow me, follow the facts. isn't it interesting that hard solid facts are so hard to come by regarding 911?
angus4321 5 years ago
Most of the links I followed on 911 Research just linked to more pages on that site. They may have titles like 'Chapter 2 of FEMA's report' but the link opens a page on 911 Research. A link to the actual FEMA site would be credible. Links to your own site are questionable.
agr2500 5 years ago
911 Research is not conspracy theorists??? The first line on the site is "We all know the official story of September 11th..."
agr2500 5 years ago
heheh, unfortunately youtube doesnt allow editing of ones own comments, I started reading things that screamed conspiracy theory, but I maintain that any site that can show their research by links that are credible, (continued)
angus4321 5 years ago
You mean you began quoting sources as truth before actually investigating the sources? Now I'm starting to doubt some of your facts. You almost had me convinced. :)
agr2500 5 years ago
I only started looking for sources again today because I knew this would come up in this rather 1 way conversation. Most of the stuff I have said I watched transpire thru the news media and Google news day after day, I actually watched the stories unfold almost moment to moment by hitting refresh and checking Google news practically hourly, (continued)
angus4321 5 years ago
being a Google News (-aholic?)hound, I see everything from so many viewpoints its not even funny, there is no way I can remember all the sources that gave me this viewpoint... the world moved on and so did I
angus4321 5 years ago
and thats what THEY wanted us to do!! LOL but really, it has been a very ... scripted way the current administration and DOD has handled the conspiracy theorists. putting out little pieces of info that make the Con Theory guys say one thing, then putting out another piece that was held back just so (ok I'll admit it) WE have egg on our faces.
angus4321 5 years ago
in any case, I'm not here to convince you, the powers that be have already convinced you and most people of their version, I am here to ask the questions that cause you and others to second guess the official story, I am certainly not convinced
angus4321 5 years ago
and like I said once before, it very easily could have been gravity that brought them down, especially the Firemans accounts I have read just recently about a 20 story large hole in building 7, but the before and after... and especially the Pentagon side of the story doesn't leave any doubts in my mind that it was aranged, allowed and
angus4321 5 years ago
Ok... Are you crazy? 20 story large hole in building 7? Have you seen the videos just before the collapse? All angles? There is just not enough fires to bring it down. And no holes!!! You think the 3 buildings WTC 1, 2, and 7 all just happened to fall the same way?
choidj 4 years ago
Look at the Madrid building. It didn't collapse when there were flames huge that covered the whole building. Building 7 hardly had any, and you are saying that fire made building 7 fall?
choidj 4 years ago
pulled off by our government, for instance, where were our military aircraft on 911? off over Canada doing War games. that and so much more makes the pit in my stomach say there are a bunch of dirty rats in government.
angus4321 5 years ago
nevermind my almost wavering faith in the above theory of "Squibs"... although the generic term for blasting caps was used, they are obviously refering to the use of explosives to take down the buildings. this clip is only part of a larger clip, you have to watch that, this is taken way out of context here.
angus4321 5 years ago
you know, PkofPk and that nagging debunking911 dot com thing right below our thread made me eat my words and check it out, it has some very interesting things to say about at least one of the towers colapse,
angus4321 5 years ago
Pressure had to cause resistance and it should have taken a little more time to hit bottom and the heat weeks after they fell?? Building "7"? Pulled, how much time and preparation does it take to set charges on a building before it is pulled??? Why didn't the other buildings in the area that were alot older Fall?
I'm sorry but there are to many unanswered questions. I still think it had help comming down. Whom I don't know.
olmosm1 5 years ago
King: "It came down at near free fall speed because there were pressure outlets created by the intense heat/weight/volume of the structure. "
False. The squibs were as far as 30 stories below, way ahead of the demolition wave. And 2, the WTC floors were hermetically sealed (air tight), so there wouldn't be pressure transfer anyways.
gavingoo 4 years ago
Because the WTC was hermetically sealed, any pressure would simply shoot out at the point of the demolition collapse-wave. It wouldn't happen 30 stories below as in the case of the WTC squibs.
gavingoo 4 years ago
ok... wow... but 1 flight to collapse a building?
wat is the song used anyway?
nekteo 5 years ago
The great thing about all of you nutcases CT's is that in this you we can keep you all in one place instead of spread out. DUHHHH. When a building like is is collaping, you would TOTALLY expect air pressure to increase as the building was squeezed downward. My degree is in civil engineering, not fantasy.
daytraderaz 5 years ago