I lol'd hard, when you said, you'd return the favor. And boy! Did you! Your commentary was both thought provoking and hilarious! Does the Agenda always seem to forget "the lesson" it learns in past shows? I remember one on Bad Science, where they went after "The Lancet" and Andrew Wakefield.
Moreover, whatever the ethics training one might receive in business school, it is generally confined to ethical behaviour in specific relationships. Client, patient, employee, organization or what have you. If the subject doesn't fall into one those sacred relationship categories then that subject is fair game for unethical behaviour. MBA's need training to be ethical, period. If you're running a quarry, you must empathize with the rock, too! We're living on that rock so, don't get carried away
A paycheck can't separate me from my ethics and so, I go hungry. For most people this isn't so. The same people are under the impression that at the end of the day they have their ethics back in their possession. This too is an illusion. Over time and at a glacial pace their ethics become the ethics or lack of ethics of the organization they belong. They still believe they are ethical beings only because they were oblivious to the transaction that auctioned their entire inventory.
Jesse, your punchline says it all. Ethics don't enter into their domain of thought. Ethics are under evolutionary pressure from capitalism. Capitalism says, 'buzz off', to ethical questions and focuses solely on the questions of profit and efficiency and market share. Ethics? What are those?
regardless if they tell the world what gender it is, people will know sooner or later anyway, and by the looks of the baby it looks like a girl
meloanthony661 8 months ago
I lol'd hard, when you said, you'd return the favor. And boy! Did you! Your commentary was both thought provoking and hilarious! Does the Agenda always seem to forget "the lesson" it learns in past shows? I remember one on Bad Science, where they went after "The Lancet" and Andrew Wakefield.
TheFaustianMan 9 months ago
Moreover, whatever the ethics training one might receive in business school, it is generally confined to ethical behaviour in specific relationships. Client, patient, employee, organization or what have you. If the subject doesn't fall into one those sacred relationship categories then that subject is fair game for unethical behaviour. MBA's need training to be ethical, period. If you're running a quarry, you must empathize with the rock, too! We're living on that rock so, don't get carried away
pfreddyp 9 months ago
A paycheck can't separate me from my ethics and so, I go hungry. For most people this isn't so. The same people are under the impression that at the end of the day they have their ethics back in their possession. This too is an illusion. Over time and at a glacial pace their ethics become the ethics or lack of ethics of the organization they belong. They still believe they are ethical beings only because they were oblivious to the transaction that auctioned their entire inventory.
pfreddyp 9 months ago
Jesse, your punchline says it all. Ethics don't enter into their domain of thought. Ethics are under evolutionary pressure from capitalism. Capitalism says, 'buzz off', to ethical questions and focuses solely on the questions of profit and efficiency and market share. Ethics? What are those?
pfreddyp 9 months ago