Added: 3 years ago
From: Veracifier
Views: 68,965
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,573)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Hitler's Third Reich played the role of God as they chose who was worthy of life, and who did not fit into their master plan of world domination. They would be experimented on and slaughtered in the most inhuman way to further his twisted aspiration. And now again today we see social engineers acting in very much the same way as they attempt to justify the slaughter of millions of innocent children in the name of women's health, choice, and overpopulation dangers... The next holocaust.

  • Um...faith and reason do not have to be at opposing ends of the spectrum (which he seems to imply). Both seek the truth. They are not the same, it is true, and some religious folks can be nuts. The same can be said for those who are so against religion as to bash anyone for having any kind of belief system at all (such as the creator). Getting rid of religion won't stop the problems he addresses. Changing hearts and minds so that people stop attaching themselves to these crazy "idols" will.

  • this guy's boring.

  • If a woman is pregnant and she's murdered, why do they charge the murderer with two counts of the crime? It seems that the liberal view is, "It's okay to kill unborn children who have never harmed anyone, but we'll stand up for the rights of those who rape or murder and we should not put them to death." These viewpoints are contradictory to one another.

  • If you prove to me with physical evidence heaven and hell exist, I will believe in it and donate all my money to the local churches in my area. and GO....

  • I resent how most atheists deal with religion, just waving it away as myth, then they expect to be respected in their ideas. I'm Catholic, I am most definitely against abortion, but I am for giving the choice to those involved. Add onto this that my stance on abortion is in a personal level, just based on the fact that you're actually killing a person. I can admit that it's a gray area for some and having that choice is the smarter option.

  • different dna, different organism

  • Look, what if a woman gets raped and she is 14? She gets pregnant, you all would say NO to THAT abortion? She is too small to go through labour and she could possibly die of having that child. Therefore, you wish to kill TWO PEOPLE instead of that one?This is Riduculous. So, answer this, you would rather kill someone who COULD BE the future president than to kill a fetus? Yes, that fetus could be better than that but, what if it had deformities? Exactly, people never think about that, do they?

  • The Super Bowl is also boring as shit!

  • @cpynch

    you say:

    "You sir, are an idiot. A baby at 9 months has working organs, that are there to let the baby survive survive outside the womb. If they aren't developed the baby can't live. If the baby can't live, the baby isn't alive"

    You absolute mo hawked arsed tool - so a poor deformed baby that happens to last the 9 months gestation period is NOT ALIVE!!! Albeit tragic. Spose you would happliy end its " non-alive" misery. Farkin Einstien.

  • @dsrm65 If a poorly deformed baby could survive outside the womb, then it's alive... How do you think a fetus @ 6 weeks would fair outside of the womb?

  • @cpynch

    just checked me inbox after 2 years sepage - whats this shit:

    "You sir, are an idiot. A baby at 9 months has working organs, that are there to let the baby survive survive outside the womb. If they aren't developed the baby can't live. If the baby can't live, the baby isn't alive."

    You defend open slather abortion but pluck 1/2 to 2/3 gestation periods out of your mangy mo-hawked arse hole. Why not round it off to 1/4. Farkin hippocrite. In Australia we prefer the term WANKA,

  • In Minecraft we still fight wars with Picaxes. :)

  • please desist in making a religious rant out of a human issue. as an atheist, you ought to be more prolife than anyone else since you believe this is the only life you get. if people are mature enough to create new human life, and the science is and always has proven that the unborn at whatever stage of development are in fact alive, unique with their own DNA, and of course human. The facts that a fetus is human are unassailable, which is why pro abortion arguments have all shifted to personhood

  • rather then just religious bashing how about u actually look at the issue properly.

    im not an american, but even i know if u put an add like that up before or during a massive game u are going to piss people off and probable end up with a fight breaking out in the crowd. i think thats moooore wat the reason for rejecting it would be.

  • General Petraeus and the flyover probably took up about 5 minutes of airtime...not 3 hours...

  • Why the hell are you talking so damn fast? I can barely understand what you're saying and there's no time to actually absorb and contemplate your ideas.

  • THAT GUY HAS SERIOUS PROBLEMS!!!

  • hey,lets kill babies. thats all i heard.

    you know what, heres a thought...we, as americans,according to the preamble (that first part of that constitution everyone in america has the RITE to hate...) says the strong should protect the weak (in smaller words) who the hell is weaker than a babe in the womb? just pushing the religion thing aside. fuck obama. fuck abortion. killing babies is unpatriotic.

  • @tfcmoojuicemajik CHECK OUT "ECLIPSE OF REASON" ABORTION DOCUMENTARY.

  • @tfcmoojuicemajik "the strong should protect the weak"

    "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

    Are you referring to the phrase "provide for the common defence"?

  • Did you say "supposably?" You do know that's not a word...?

  • Why does everyone feel that we need to accept atheism or theism? I'm a devout GOD fearing individual who believes in RELIGOUS FREEDOM. Religion or lack of religion is not the problem, the problem is simply this; people wish to dictate there beliefs on others in a coercive way. If your ideas are true and pure you should be able to persuade people to your way of thinking, if that doesn't work oh well move on. Who says we all have to think the same way. We are individuals and should remain that way

  • i would love to know how u do not believe in God. i mean goshhh its so obvious.

  • "I agree with this guy. Y'all are ignorant. Once people's religious beliefs stop intruding on other people's lives we will be able to make progress."

    this statement on a video about abortions seeing how majority one side(liberals) say its a human right to have abortions legally and the other side(republican also you mention religion which is large part of republican pro-life side) saying that ones religion is intruding on your rights yet you ignore the(continued next comment

  • Wow---like there's no culture wars? You have been living under a rock since whenever it is you were born. That was a truthful ad that was too close to the truth for the libs in media to show. After all, it would have made people think--can't have that now, can we? Grow a brain, do some research, then express your opinion. You'll sound much less like the idiot you do in this vid.

  • I'm more on the pro life or anti abortion side than the pro choice or pro abortion side and I m not religious. I am agnostic, I am not a republican, I am anti war and I am VERY pro condom. I also have athiest and christian friends

    stop pretending everyone that doesn't agree with sucking a fetus brain out is some dimwitted bible thumper that loves war, you are not as intelligent as you think you are mr. progressive.

    to me this isn't an issue about god, it's about the dignity of HUMAN life.

  • @answerz2no1 True, and I'm Christian and agree, my religion just believes the same thing I do.

  • @answerz2no1 it's an issue about women's rights!

  • @iluvchocolateyeah2 So much for equality, eh? What about the child's rights?

  • lol hahaha WHERE ARE YOUR EARS?!?!?!?!?! hahahah

  • he just made himself look like an idiot... that video (imagine spot 1) made him look like an idiot.... watch imagine spot 2 and imagine spot 3 to be informed of what is true, to see how you can change a life...

  • Abortion Is murder... and i dont just mean that to Throw it in your face but SEX is for Making Children and if you dont want to have one then STOP FUCKING EVERYONE!!! The ignorance is being taught to us by our own ppl "wear a condom" "take birth control" these are things are damaging our World. A child is being made and its your fault not its. So whatever pro CHOICE.. Lets murder babies that sounds Logical

  • @tattoomaniacsalina lol i bet you haven't had sex before, you wouldn't understand why we fuck but don't want kids, i hope Pamela Handerson serves you well.

  • @tattoomaniacsalina do something .

  • What a sick person.

  • You have a religious componant to the Presidential inauguration because 84% of your population still believe in God. And you want us to believe your 16% are the only ones who are intellectually endowed? How can we mock the existance of heaven without mocking the idea that human life in the womb is not human when everything in science tells us it is. Chew on that.

  • See your a dumbass this is not all about religion dumbshit

  • Stupid fucking liberals useless to this great country

  • Silly close minded people, who can't appreciate the views of another person.

  • @Harrymfink Right i should appreciate the views of the communists right.

  • First off, using "right" and "communist" together as a label makes absolutely no sense. Secondly the views of this individual are basically statements fueled by empirical evidence, reason and a hint of opinion. If you can't even watch this without ignorantly labeling him a "communist right" maybe you're the problem with "this great country." Karl Marx would punch you in the dick for comparing those two.

  • are you agnostic or atheist?

    atheists are just as ignorant as theists, just so you know, because you both claim to have the answers when that is impossible to achieve in this life.

    in any case, you are taking a position without making yourself clear and you have done nothing to explain the reasons behind your views.

  • It is true that atheists can't prove that there isn't a supreme being. But it isn't for us to prove. Its for the religious to prove there is, and the irony is that they can't. So then why should anyone really believe? There could be a tea cup floating in space millions of light years away, I can't prove there isn't but that alone shouldn't justify its existence. That would be crazy and nonsensical. Why don't you think before labeling a entire group of people ignorant.

  • @Harrymfink any rational belief must be based on evidence, including disbelief. the only reasonable and logical thing to do is to accept that we couldn't possibly have the answers, and so it's limiting to our own understanding if we choose the truth that we like. whether we choose no, or choose yes, with whatever bullshit goes along with it, we have chosen truth, which is impossible, because truth is unchanging. go ask any 5 scientists (who are willing to discuss it) if they are atheists. 2 max.

  • I'll explain it again. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is a brainy quote that holds value. But I'll use the analogy again but my own version. Lets say I told you there is a planet occupied by a breed of unicorn on the opposite side of the universe. You tell me bullshit, but I say prove there isn't. You would be unable to ever prove me wrong. So are you saying that because you don't know, you can't disbelieve such nonsense with certainty? I'm willing to take that step.

  • @Harrymfink science has already proven that you can't disregard things like that. but then again, i don't put much weight into modern science either, since it has existed for only a little over 100 years. but the fact of the matter is, we just can't know. your argument is completely different than the example you used in the beginning, because the 1st simply states that both positive and negative positions require facts to back them up. your example, however, goes into specific details.

  • @Harrymfink and then you proceed to assume that anything you can imagine, just because you imagined it without evidence to back it up, must not exist since you have no proof at the moment. answer this: HOW DO YOU KNOW THERE ISN'T SOME PLANET FULL OF UNICORNS? how do you know there isn't a planet just like the one you described, right down to the last detail, even though you created the details? you just don't. it might seem logical to denounce such nonsense, but it's most logical to remain open.

  • To answer your unicorn question, I could fill your brain with similar analogies all day. There is a difference between being open without a filter and logically open minded. I can deduce that it is highly unlikely for a type of horse similar to earths with a horn protruding from its head on another planet. You couldn't prove it, I couldn't prove it, but those to facts by themselves aren't enough to give the theory credibility at all.

  • @Harrymfink highly unlikely? are you a highschool student or something? read a fucking book and then get back to me. its actually HIGHLY LIKELY had our universe is filled with anything you can imagine. have you heard of probability, or the notion of an expanding universe within a megaverse? your bullshit comebacks are eighth grade at best. i doubt i'll respond to you again, since you seem to be little more than a whining, childish atheist. so go ahead, get your last word.

  • Last word? You sound like Bill O'Reilly. I don't label myself an atheist for the same reason a don't label myself an a-racist. It's simply ridiculous to have a label for the non existence of something. And if you feel that every imaginary being I could conceive ( a snake with a giant toe on its forehead for example) is enough evidence for its possibility of existing, then fine.

  • @Harrymfink i'm certainly glad you don't label yourself as such, and i think you have a very sensible opinion on these issues. my blood often gets boiled on these subjects, so i am sincerely sorry if i came off as ignorant of as offensive. i think one thing we can all agree on is that Positivity > Negativity, and so we should all learn to agree with eachother on some points and celebrate our difference of opinion on others.

    thanks for your reply, and thanks more for being reasonable and kind

  • @Harrymfink also, it sounds like you share my hatred for bill the fascist o'reilly. when i saw his interview with the son of the 9/11 victim i punched a small dent in my wall. like i said, my blood gets boiled sometimes! i hope soon people like him will be brought to justice.

  • @Harrymfink once you limit your understanding like atheists and theists do, then you've decided to limit your quest for truth and knowledge. if you choose to remain open, then anything is possible, and you will always discover new things. being open doesnt mean ever buying into anything, and it means always demanding evidence as well, but it also means that you do not choose your truth, since truth is unchanging. atheists choose not to believe in god even though their disbelief is belief itself.

  • Comment removed

  • There is are also credible source that track the elements of the major religions that have survived today. There is the ancient Egyptian religions, Zorastorianism along with different types of shamanists who all were concerned with the mysteries of life. What best fills that void than a quick answer. Just knowing that there have been thousands of religions should tell you that this has the human element all over it. This is more than enough proof to show how God came from man.

  • He is brilliant but blind.

  • LOL! This guy is really funny! And full of himself, I might add. I wasted over 3 minutes of my life listening to his diatribe against religion, and still heard nothing of value.

  • Try cleaning your ears. And turn the mute off. Then turn the volume way way up. Try focusing on the words then the sentences as a whole. Soon you'll have a whole dialogue you can comprehend.

  • What happened to "If you don't like it, don't watch it" . I suppose this is what passes for intellect in the post modern era.You may want to stop and consider that what you are saying is nothing new. Thousands of years ago, these words were recorded; "The fool has said in his heart, there is no God."

    Yet, faith in God remains. You suppose your intellect can defeat God. Sorry. Better men have tried. What an angry man you are. Think again. The heavens declare Him. Keep looking..peace.

  • The cynical tone doesn't help his opinion much. Just makes me...tired.

  • Romans 1:16-32

  • You mention hypocrisy in your video... Isn't it rather hypocritical to be pro-choice after you've already been born? Good thing your mom was pro-life...

  • After he used the non-word "supposebly", I tuned out. Why are so many people grammatically retarded?

  • This is dumb. All it is, is a guy spitting intelligent words out at you, bashing faith. No reason for that, it gets bashed enough without his help. We are America, that's why in an American sport, AMERICA is publicized. Ridiculous.

  • Comment removed

  • I agree with this guy. Y'all are ignorant. Once people's religious beliefs stop intruding on other people's lives we will be able to make progress.

  • @Ryebread092 nope

  • @Ryebread092 well according to your logic i can go kill a kid and its ok not a crime but a human right

  • @Southernjuggalo63 I don't think you understood anything I said, if that's the case.

  • @Ryebread092 i understood what you said you say abortion is a right so i said if i go kill a child according to your logic it would be ok and a right to do so

  • @Southernjuggalo63 Yeah, you definitely didn't understand anything I said. Mostly because I never said anything about rights or that it's okay to kill children. Could you please explain how you thought I said either of those statements?

  • @Ryebread092 saying that ones religion is intruding on your rights yet you ignore the founding documents of the UNITED STATES that all mention GOD and was created with christianity involved in it the UNITED STATES was fouded because of religious reasons and to ignore that is to ignore the basis of this country the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE makes 4 references about GOD directly alone and to ignore that religion was the basis of this country is to ignore historical facts

  • @Southernjuggalo63 Too bad most of the Founding Fathers were deists, so your "this country was founded on Christianity" argument is invalid. Furthermore, there's this principle you might be familiar with of separating the Church from the State because they wanted to prevent issues such as abortion to be resolved by "because the God of my religion said so". If you feel that it's okay to murder children, go ahead. This country has punishments for such actions. If you feel like such actions (con'd)

  • @Ryebread092 Most of teh foundign Fathers were deists? Huh? I know soem were but most? I know all were affected by the outdated enlightenment but all were deists? Hmm that is just not true. Also you mention the phrase seperation of church and state that was in what government document? Okay none.

  • @Ryebread092 Also it might interest you to read some of teh state constitutions that these founding fathers made after they supposedly believed in seperation of church and state (as understood by most today). These documents are full of religious and christian statements and imagery. hmm.\

  • @Southernjuggalo63 are detestable and against your morals, then don't do it. Similarly, if you feel that getting an abortion is fine, then support their use. If your God frowns upon them, don't get one and don't stop others who don't believe in your God from doing so.

  • @Ryebread092 well then according to your own ideology if i think its ok to murder kids its ok with you see how fucked up your ideology is and also we as states cant outlaw it on our state because of the federal government dictating to our state which is actually the opposite of why this country was started

  • @Southernjuggalo63 Silly juggalo, you're misreading everything I say. There isn't any point in replying to your comments anymore if you're not going to take the time to read and comprehend my messages.

  • @Ryebread092 no what your saying is do what you feel is right and having that opinion can be a real problem i guess you support terrorist too if they think what they are doing is right haha

  • @Ryebread092 u are wrong. once people accept God then we will be able to start making progress. GOD BLESS AMERICA!!

  • @Ryebread092 So if my religious beliefs can't intrude on your life, then why can your non-religious beliefs intrude upon mine? I would say ignorance is not realizing that you may just be wrong. Your argument is counter-productive: it states that, for the sake of progress, religious people should shut up. I'm pretty sure the last time that happened, millions of Jews were sent to the incinerator. Is that progress? I guess for one man it was.

  • Spoken like a true communist! DUDE, look, you are just a pile of human flesh, empty of any reason, or spirit, or any intelligence. You are a sponge, soaking up progressive(communist) regurgitated rhetoric given by empty vessels of human flesh, pretending to be somewhat of a human. Your (using this term very loosely) "intellectual" rant means absolutely nothing to the average American. Your voice passes your lips like methane passes the anus of a chimpanzee, after eating his own feces.

  • Correct, people who have claimed to know the will of God and have killed in his name were wrong. However, people have also been killed FOR practicing religion, by persecuting those who practice religion JUST FOR DOING THAT. You are in effect killing in the name of Atheism. And as far as I know there is nothing in the bible that says we should have gone into Iraq. Except if you mean by freeing the Iraqi people from a dictator then yes. That would probably go into the loving thy neighbor category.

  • and yes, religion and abortion are connected. take much less religious countries like Denmark. abortion is not a huge issue there. cause people understand why women do them and not because an old book says its bad. thats whats hypocritical - that same book also says that slavery, murdering infidels, raping virgins etc is fine. means we should practice it? no! times change and our thinking adapts to the progress. we know that slavery is not moral in any way now!

  • @eleminatus You obviously have not read the bible. In the Old Testament the Jews did all the things you say. BUT THEY DID THEM IN ORDER TO SURVIVE!!! All the other cultures in that period of time were mostly worse then that. The majority of them sacrificed their firstborns. In none of Jesus's teaching does he say raping is alright or murdering or slavery. Unless you mean the "Slaves obey your masters' thing. Which actually means 'employees Respect your boss' and vice versa.

  • @darkprotoss19 you didnt just say that! to SURVIVE?! check the history. China was way ahead culture wise. why didnt jesus appear there? why did he attempt to convert savage desert people?! and you obviously havent read your bible - Exodus 21:1-4, Exodus 21:7, Deuteronomy 21:10-14, Deuteronomy 23:15-16, Numbers 31:28-47, and many more, where slavery as we know it is explicitly OKEY according to bible! not to mention rape, murder, pillage, genocide etc read the book first!

  • @eleminatus Umm i'm not sure what your trying to prove here. "DON'T hand a slave back to their master.", "If you are not pleased with the captive women as your wife you MUST NOT treat her as a slave. "If he marries another woman, he MUST NOT deprive the first one of her food, clothing and marital rights." Seems like me that god is granting mercy to these captured people, Not slaughtering them. And once again all Old Testament show me something in the NEW Testament, in Jesus's teachings.

  • @eleminatus Stop crying like a pussy. Move to Denmark if you like it there so much.

  • on abortion topic - we were all sperm some time in the past, so masturbation is a genocide then? besides morals, abortion includes social and economical issues. child may not have father, may be condemned to poverty, mother may never receive education (if shes young), health issues for fetus and mother etc. how about thinking about this too. most women that do abortions have to do them: health issues, teen stupidity, accidental pregnancy etc.

  • @eleminatus Sperm dying is not a sin nor is killing an egg. Otherwise men couldn't have wet dreams and women wouldn't have their periods. Those two combining into something that SHALL become a child no matter what, THAT is what is wrong to kill. As for your reasons for HAVING to do an abortion. They are retarded, these women are just trying to escape the consequences. Them getting pregnant(Aside from them being raped) is their fault. And they should face the consequences.

  • @darkprotoss19 so you say masturbation is okey, because supposedly god gave men wet dreams and women period. then, following same logic, god gave women miscarriages. then abortion isnt as bad in gods eyes huh? he also gave people diseases, is it "sinful" to try and cure them? and yes, abortion is all about avoiding consequences. as i said, there are more issues attached to abortion then sin and religion. Easy to talk about it, not as much when you get in those shoes.

  • @eleminatus Masturbation is not okay because it disrespects your future wife and all womn. Not because your killing sperm. Millions of Sperm die even when a women DOES get Pregnant. Miscarriages are tragic and NOT INTENTIONAL!! Disease is a natural part of this world trying to cure it is human nature. If god wants us to die, be assured we WILL die some way or the other. If I had a Child out of wedlock I would care for that child and FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF MY ACTIONS INSTEAD OF RUNNING AWAY!

  • @darkprotoss19 so now masturbation is evil again. Couple comments ago you said they are okey since men have wet dreams. self-contradiction. And how on Earth do i disrespect women with masturbating? women masturbate themselves, its not men-only activity you know! religion always made sex complicated, but its not. These are natural desires, forces inside us. And according to your book, god gave them to us. So how the hell are they wrong or disrespectful?!

  • @eleminatus A Wet Dream is ejaulating in your sleep. Not Intentional and therefore not excatly a sin. And yes your right i am sorry. Men and women Masturbating are both wrong because, once again they disrespect the respective spouses. Religion does not make sex complicated. God did give us these desires but he also told us when to use them. Sex is between a Married man and women. God decreed that so that issues such as accidental pregnancy wouldn't happen. As well as a whole slew of other issues

  • @darkprotoss19 this intentional, that unintentional, god this, god that. how do you know?! in 2000 years you havent even proved your god exists. where does bible say anything about wet dreams, abortion, masturbation being disrespectful? and since when god became interested in my personal sex life? you know what you aredoing? SPECULATING! interpreting bible the way YOU find it appealing. Your god is an idiot if he watches me having sex but cant save a childs life! monster, pervert, ignorant!

  • @darkprotoss19 there look what your bible represents - Leviticus 25:44-46, Exodus 21:2-6, Exodus 21:7-11, Exodus 21:20-21, Ephesians 6:5. Oh, and heres some from NEW testament - 1 Timothy 6:1-2, Luke 12:47-48, these are slavery, lets switch to murder - Deuteronomy 17:12, Exodus 22:17, Leviticus 20:13, Leviticus 20:27, Exodus 21:15, Proverbs 20:20, Zechariah 13:3, Deuteronomy 13:13-19, 2 Kings 2:23-24, Isaiah 14:21, Ezekiel 9:5-7, Jeremiah 51:20-26, Leviticus 26:21-22, 1 Samuel 15:2-3

  • @darkprotoss19 there look what your bible represents - Leviticus 25:44-46, Exodus 21:2-6, Exodus 21:7-11, Exodus 21:20-21, Ephesians 6:5. Oh, and heres some from NEW testament - 1 Timothy 6:1-2, Luke 12:47-48, these are slavery, lets switch to murder - Deuteronomy 17:12, Exodus 22:17, Leviticus 20:13, Leviticus 20:27, Exodus 21:15, Proverbs 20:20, Zechariah 13:3, Deuteronomy 13:13-19, 2 Kings 2:23-24, Isaiah 14:21, Ezekiel 9:5-7, Jeremiah 51:20-26, Leviticus 26:21-22, 1 Samuel 15:2-3

  • @darkprotoss19 now some rape and pillage - Judges 21:10-24, Numbers 31:7-18, Deuteronomy 20:10-14, Deuteronomy 22:28-29, 2 Samuel 12:11-14, Deuteronomy 21:10-14, Judges 5:30, Exodus 21:7-11, Zechariah 14:1-2. Read those and then tell me your book is all great! And dont just jump onto new testament, it is based on old testament. all the commandments are in the old testament, so dont just pick and choose. instead of being ignorant just look what your book really represents - bronze age barbarians

  • @darkprotoss19 and yet again following your logic, if a woman got pregnant, and doesnt want the baby, she is (roughly speaking) condemned for the rest of her life (harvesting the consequences). its like saying, man died cause doctors made a mistake. so they get fired (consequences), or realized that mistakes happen and let them save more people. so its having a baby, and probably having financial issues, no education etc, or giving another chance to fix a mistake.

  • Respond to this video... Ummm yes. She should be condemned because of her actions just like any other person should be because of any other action the take that has consequences. A Doctor making a Mistake and a Women mistakenly getting pregnant are not even remotely close. A women chose to make the mistake(The point of Birth-control is moot, abstinence is 99.99% effective in preventing pregnancy) A doctor(The one that doesn't face consequences) Made the mistake unintentionally.

  • @eleminatus Once again not sure what your trying to prove. Sounds like god wants to put rapists to death FINE WITH ME. The women thing may sound over the top but it also encourages women to fight off rapists. And/or if their both willing he's saying Adultery is wrong. Which is true. Also I seem to remember a story in the New Testament about Jesus saving an immoral women from a stoneing. And also these are not Jesus's Teachings find something in the New Testemant.

  • @darkprotoss19 you are just like any other religious person "guarding" bible. pretending its all so great. new testament? why new? why old is unusable all of the sudden? you pick and choose from your own bible what to believe and how to believe, ignore some verses and emphasize others. you know how its called? hypocrisy! you arent even honest when talking about you book. and that verse i gave - you interpret it YOUR way, while it simply says that rape victim has to die together with rapist!

  • @darkprotoss19 you are inconsistent. Miscarriage is gods way of abortion (according to your beliefs). So how on earth human made abortion is different. Its hard to define when fetus is already human or at least resembling human, however you dont call four wheels and a seat - car, right? same here, if you call a couple week fetus human, that doesnt even have central nervous system, then you canalso call sperm human, since both are different levels of development but NOT yet developed!

  • @darkprotoss19 and or responsibility - you you gonna have an unplanned baby and try to keep it and raise it, great, i applaud you. Awesome, if you want to sacrifice some of your life goals and opportunities, great. However dont assume everyone must follow same principals of your book. If i would make a girl pregnant, and she would like to keep it, i would fully take responsibility too. But if abortion was an option for her, i would agree on that.

  • @darkprotoss19 and thats not running from a problem, thats dealing with it according to every possible criteria and not an ancient fairy tail book!

  • You know, if I were a cat, this would have made me flick my tail. No, not my whole tail. Just the very tip. Since I am a human, I'll simply say I shrugged. In the grand scheme of things, really, it's hard to separate religion from politics from culture. One's worldview is not neatly categorized, you see. To make statements about "religious wars" etc. is to rather blindly forget how culture and politics hijacked religion. At least, if we're speaking of Christian history in the Western world.

  • i'm an atheist, and even i know abortion is wrong. abortion has nothing to do with RELIGION, this guys claim is pretty retarded LOL. killing an innocent fetus is murder, its barbaric. we're in the 21st century, we're really going to start murdering our own children? thats acceptable? wow.

  • Were you a fetus at one point? if you were 'aborted' would you be alive today...and how is that different then killing? You notice he doesn't mention all the people killed by Atheists, like Stalin, Pol Pot, or Mao Zedong, as well as the hate that those and other PROGRESSIVES perpetrate throughout half the world. If you use Religion to perpetrate hate tour not using religion the right way. And by the way we shouldn't have PROOF of heaven if there was there would be no need for faith.

  • @darkprotoss19 oh yes, they were atheists, however they did not kill people because or "in the name" of atheism. while christian and islamic atrocities were done "in the name of god". i assume you are christian. look through history and count how many lives were taken in the name of your god. even war in Iraq is Jesus-approved, how about that. and yes, i do hate religion. cause its good deeds can never outweigh the bad ones. tho you still defend it

  • Some people have their faith, some people have their opinion. But since your faith is imaginary and my opinion is real, it will be difficult to agree.

  • Tedious

  • It is amazing that your subtly violent language--hence the sarcasm and vehement spiritual attacks--speaks so blatantly against religiously ritualistic killing, yet the fanatical notion of true intellect infecting the religious core of many people in America is leading to the justification of the oppression of an unborn nation. To clarify I did not say religious or religion based killing is OK. It is wrong in most cases except for defending a nation or capital punishment.

  • you sir, are an asshole.

  • Who is this Asshole?

  • pathetic, sticking up for what is really geonocide purposfully aimed at people of african decent. Another foaming at the mouth racist trying to disguise their true thirst for blood with a psudo intellectual arguement. A friend once told me that there was no such thing as a well endowed white racist, since thats what springs hate in the first place, envy.

  • Get a life and quit preying on innocent children..

  • Abortion is murder.

  • @KnightOwl2006 Really? Maybe in Iraq. "the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another" Abortion is lawful here in the USA. Therefore you are a liar.

  • you know AMERICA was FOUNDED on the thing you call 'silly faith'. It was started by PROTESTANTS. A denomination of CHRISTIANITY. in CHRISTIANITY, they follow the BIBLE, and in the BIBLE it says THOU SHAL NOT MURDER. LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION. That FETUS as a HEARTBEAT and a LIFE it COULD live in the future. TAKING IT AWAY is a CRIME in and of itself. MURDER is PUNISHABLE BY MANY MANY YEARS IN JAIL. All these rules were built off Faith. What do you have to say to that?

  • @143rdShadowARCunit Nope, there were many deist in among the founding fathers and atheist. Abortion is not murder, murder is unlawful killing and abortion is lawful therefore it is not murder. You are wrong.

  • @y2zgt are you kidding me? The pilgrims, christopher columbus, and most anyone else that came from europe, was part of either the catholic church or the protestant church. Maybe orthodox but they didnt do much in my book. And Murder is a crime of taking someones life. Only exception is soldiers on the field. so no. I'm not wrong.

  • @143rdShadowARCunit So you consider the pilgrims the founding fathers? Not Jefferson, Adams, Washington and Paine??

    No murder is the unlawful killing of a human. Abortion is not unlawful, it is lawful therefore you are a liar saying that abortion is murder. 

  • @y2zgt Well the Pilgrims ARE the ones who kinda started the whole continent population thing. And money, the decleration or whatever says in God we trust, or something with God in it. Magna carta or something. America was founded on Judeo-Christian rules. it's where we got our ethics and laws from. Assassination. People can be hired to do it and kill innocent or bad people. Some people with 'the liscense to kill' are legally allowed to do it...does that automaticaly mean its not bad to kill?

  • @y2zgt You are a liar. I am never talking to you again. You have lied.

  • SOOOO MAANNNNNYYYY VIIIEEEWWWSSS BRO!!!!! KEEP GOING YOURE CHANGING THE WORLD!!!!!.......pause, not

  • Comment removed

  • What a sad individual, so obsessed with trying to crush the faith and beliefs of others. Kind of like a spoiled little child popping another child's balloon. "I don't have it, so you shouldn't have it either!" Sad, dude. Sad.

    (PS: I'm kinds sad that I wasted time watching your little anti-God tantrum)

  • @TheBrotherBo

    Modern day Saul

  • @TheBrotherBo when i saw youre comment, i meant to thumb it up, but the mouse slipped and hit down. my bad, bro.

  • Are you really implying that he is jealous of your faith? Try changing your analogy to a child having a nuclear war head and the speaker of this video trying to talk him out of using it. Because using it would result in... the extinction of all humans! This is the potential religion has, especially religion taken much more serious over seas. You, however, don't take your religion seriously which is AWESOME for people like me, but it also shows you're not intellectually honest with yourself.

  • @TheBrotherBo I agree with you. This guy is a real jerk

  • Comment removed

  • Religion isn't a bad thing. Democracy is long and complicated for that very reason.

    So flaws can be debated and argued and debated and argued. Leave it be, religion is a liberty everyone and anyone can have. For the sake of "God" listen to what your saying.

  • back up three feet, shave your stubble, speak like you don't own the world and then maybe i could actually finish this video. but i stopped at like 00:51

  • You're committing a grave logical fallacy here. Football was created in America, by the military. Having a general flip a coin to open its biggest contest of the year seems pretty appropriate. We're at war/we have a standing military/football was created to be analogous to battle. These are not "issues." If the two teams were the Muslims and Infidels, then, I could see your point that NBC and the NFL engage in "the issues." But they weren't, and so they didn't.

    P.S. - do you have a ponytail?

  • Man, I watched this whole thing hoping the real Gerard Butler would abort this guy!

  • You're annoying. Get off my internet.

  • what a homo

  • Fail- but i like it

  • Fail

  • fail

  • what an idiot! Oh ya, his views on life aren't violent. What do you call death in the womb? And by the way, look up history and see what christianity has done for the world. The FIRST colleges, shelter for the poor, and despite what many liberals/athiest will have you believe......WOMENS RIGHTS. LOOK IT UP!!!! These things any many more.

  • @jmwilliams023 Look further back in history and see that many nations had christianity FORCED upon them. Biggest one being the Crusades. Also the spanish Catholics forcing their christianity onto the Incan and Mayan people.

  • @MrEvitcartta and in the end their countries would be in a worse situation without the millions upon millions that Catholic individuals and the Catholic church pour into SA every year

  • @alexbliss1 A worse situation? Evidence shows the Incan were a utopian people. They had fair taxes, and relative wealth. An abundance of food. They had their own government. And violence was a last resort. They would lay ask tribes to join before instantly attacking them. While hernan cortez and his conquestador slaughtered at will. And turned the peoples of america against eachother.

  • @MrEvitcartta don't be naive, those civilizations would never have lasted regardless of who conquered them when, they were outdated. Also, i want to know where you got all of your facts that you proudly display...the Incan government was a military/religious hierarchy that collected taxes to be redistributed to the wealthy. they also had a completely inhumane punishment system, they didnt have any prisons because the punishments for most crimes was death....sounds very peaceful to me!!!!!!!

  • @MrEvitcartta there will always be conquerors and the conquered, and almost always, in the long term, the conquered and conquerors will be in a better situation because of a sharing of ideas and resources

  • @alexbliss1 Lol! The SHARING of ideas? Perhaps I get my Aztec and Incan mixed up, but they had a prophecy where Quetzcoatl (One of their most favored gods) would return. He would have fair skin and facial hair. When Hernan Cortez heard of this he exploited their beliefs and said he was their god. Then he proceeded to take Montezuma II hostage. Montezuma offered Gold and Silver. Once Cortez got the gold he beheaded him anyway,

  • @MrEvitcartta LOLLOLOLOLOL i don't care about that, in face my original point was that the church, while perhaps providing misguided motivation for the Spaniards, have improved the situation in SA exponentially....also the term "long run" usually doesn't mean short term, as in any events that would happend in Cortes' life time LOL

  • @alexbliss1 I don't agree that in the long run it was for their own good. So you have your opinions I have mine, let's end it there.

  • @jmwilliams023 Actually, xtianity was very anti-woman.. pretty much all religions are except paganism.. hence why the catheters don't allow woman priests, and why women are, as instructed in the bible, to keep their heads covered, and silent, in church, ect.. Oh and, since you care so much about stainity's bane on history.. xtains fought HEAVILY AGAINST the outlawing of slavery- and stainity/catheterism was the CAUSE of black slavery. You god approves of, instructs it wholly. Want proof?

  • gay

  • they said this with a strait face LOL

  • @Veracifier = moron.

  • Similar style editing with overlapping points and quick chatter is popular with teens who lack attention span and get bored easily. The problem is usually the youtubers who you find doing this are also youthful and offer fresh humorous with a dash of intelligence opinions. This guy is to old to appeal to any of these youths and too politically charged and opinionated not to mention phony. I wonder if anyone actually finds him amusing other than himself.

  • @alexfla123 Your words are well written.

  • There has to be a line drawn somewhere. What if your friendly Neo-Nazi neighbor was given right to abort you? It is good that there is debate since there will always be a line drawn, it may move this way or that way but it helps keep a common peace.

  • Uh.... Whats this have to do with abortion?

  • a video camera, computer software and slightly eloquent speech makes not a good argument

  • @led0zeppelin1977 They certainly don't. You know what does? Substance. Something you will find in that video, but definitely not the bible.

  • @cygnusXhaust oh, you mean like the substance of your fellow nonbelievers like Stalin and Lenin????