Some idiot chef here in this country (ashamed to name it) is on a commercial asking for funding to help stop the asians eating cats and dogs but he happily slices and garnishes a steak for you.
Whats the difference.
Dont say pets and livestock are different all animals right.
Also you (buy on commercial) F$%^ing idiot think of the BS products for pets that cause more landfill waste and crap that we have. F#%ING SELL OUT.
During a speech to the Texas Academy of Science in March 2006, biologist Dr. Eric R. Pianka advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the world’s population through the airborne ebola virus. The reaction from scores of top scientists and professors in attendance was not one of shock or revulsion – they stood and applauded Pianka’s call for mass genocide.
Currently the 6billion people on earth can share Texas with 1000 sqft each. So what in 100 years we share Texas x2. This is sad. do the math yourself.
dont listen to pronatalist, he/she consistently argues that the planet earth will not be a happy place until every square foot of space is taken up by a person. Its obvious religion has fractured he/his skull in many places is isn't thinking logically.
Global elete fund our schools to push this crap. Tax people who breath and we need to kill everyone to save the world crap. You don't see this guy killing off his family to save the world. Like Ted Turner who had 5 kids and wants everyone else to have one or no kids. These people are crazy do the research and find the truth. It is about tax and population control.
All the people that are big on the, "Zero Population Growth", thing seem to also be big on open borders and taking full advantage of the room their policies have created for their illegal labor for the criminals in business.
Every country of the world is now being over run with illegal invaders and the Revolutionaries in control refuse to abide by the laws of the various nations. Many of the laws they themselves have passed.
Well you have to improve education and health and I think the population goes down right? A mass holocaust in the future by elites is very real to control population.
Humans dominate? I think that was the idea when God commanded people to multiply and have dominion over nature and other creatures. Educated morons didn't figure out that meant by sheer numbers?
Notice how deceptive his speech is. Isn't "everybody agrees" a ploy of deceptive liberals trying to cram bad policy down our throats? After a few hours, most everybody just agrees with 2 billion, even though there's no worthwhile way to get there? Is that even likely?
try again on the bible - yes it says that we have dominion over the earth but then it says to keep/guard nature. If you could read hebrew then you would realize that this is the same word/language that is used to describe the keeping of sabath/shabbat
A balance has nothing to do with equal #'s --- it has to do with not causing mass extinction of the earth's species. (and God saw all that he created and God said it was very good!)
You also don't seem to understand that we can not survive on a planet that is void of life. Nature does 100's of billions of dollars worth of services for free - we would go bankrupt if we try to reproduce natures services. (go learn about this)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
To ShalomYal:
Who's talking of getting rid of life? The anti-people population phobics? God intended that life, especially human life, to be-come ABUNDANT.
Read the part in the new book, "Climate Confusion" by Roy Spencer, about the Climate Modelers Versus the Meteorologists, pages 86-87. The latter is more inclined to view the climate (or nature?) as self-regulating, not trying to force nature into simplistic flawed "models" and then having over-arrogance and over-confidence in flimsy models.
This is so important. Though I don't believe in abortion but I do believe in population control. People should be banned from having more that one child....
I do not believe in human population control, as that is obviously against freedom and dignity. If people want to breed so much (as I also want a "large" family), let them populate the planet more densely and efficiently. Let them live and breed in closer proximity to their neighbors, if ever necessary to find or make room for so many.
Religion and human reproductive urges tell us to enlarge the human race for the greater good of the many.
I've lived in the small town, the countryside, and the big city, and I think I like the big city best. Of course any of those will do, as a place to live.
"One of the best things we can do for future generations is to have lots of children. How else can they be born?" Pronatalist
That's fine but come live in Tokyo to see how "great" it is. Your images of the masses living in harmony will be smashed--unless you think that manners, courtesy, humility, and thoughtfulness aren't important for societies....
Of course manners, courtesy, humility, and thoughtfulness matter. I consider promoting such social graces, a proper part of pronatalism. If more people are to enjoy living at once, together, then hadn't we also purposely be nice to each other? A kind and friendly society can far more easily, live more vastly and densely and efficiently together, for the greater good of the many. And social graces should make it easier to relax and welcome our babies to naturally push out.
Well, pronatalist, my suggestion is for you to move to Tokyo for a year or two, so you can see what it's like to live in a densely populated urban sprawl. After one year of riding the train to work and back you might just change your thinking....
Some idiot chef here in this country (ashamed to name it) is on a commercial asking for funding to help stop the asians eating cats and dogs but he happily slices and garnishes a steak for you.
Whats the difference.
Dont say pets and livestock are different all animals right.
Also you (buy on commercial) F$%^ing idiot think of the BS products for pets that cause more landfill waste and crap that we have. F#%ING SELL OUT.
Ryzler13 11 months ago
During a speech to the Texas Academy of Science in March 2006, biologist Dr. Eric R. Pianka advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the world’s population through the airborne ebola virus. The reaction from scores of top scientists and professors in attendance was not one of shock or revulsion – they stood and applauded Pianka’s call for mass genocide.
esther19741974 1 year ago
Currently the 6billion people on earth can share Texas with 1000 sqft each. So what in 100 years we share Texas x2. This is sad. do the math yourself.
cmcdonough2 2 years ago
great video.
controlpopulation 3 years ago
Don't use contraception to control the words population, let mass starvation do it.
One way or another balance will be restored, natures answer is the least pleasant way.
776281 3 years ago 4
dont listen to pronatalist, he/she consistently argues that the planet earth will not be a happy place until every square foot of space is taken up by a person. Its obvious religion has fractured he/his skull in many places is isn't thinking logically.
mgilbo1 3 years ago
Global elete fund our schools to push this crap. Tax people who breath and we need to kill everyone to save the world crap. You don't see this guy killing off his family to save the world. Like Ted Turner who had 5 kids and wants everyone else to have one or no kids. These people are crazy do the research and find the truth. It is about tax and population control.
gurujohnie 3 years ago
All the people that are big on the, "Zero Population Growth", thing seem to also be big on open borders and taking full advantage of the room their policies have created for their illegal labor for the criminals in business.
Every country of the world is now being over run with illegal invaders and the Revolutionaries in control refuse to abide by the laws of the various nations. Many of the laws they themselves have passed.
StokeyBob7 3 years ago
Well you have to improve education and health and I think the population goes down right? A mass holocaust in the future by elites is very real to control population.
CorollaKing 4 years ago 2
Humans dominate? I think that was the idea when God commanded people to multiply and have dominion over nature and other creatures. Educated morons didn't figure out that meant by sheer numbers?
Notice how deceptive his speech is. Isn't "everybody agrees" a ploy of deceptive liberals trying to cram bad policy down our throats? After a few hours, most everybody just agrees with 2 billion, even though there's no worthwhile way to get there? Is that even likely?
pronatalist 4 years ago
try again on the bible - yes it says that we have dominion over the earth but then it says to keep/guard nature. If you could read hebrew then you would realize that this is the same word/language that is used to describe the keeping of sabath/shabbat
ShalomYal 3 years ago
Did anybody actually measure for that graph, or did they just make it up? 98%? That's an exxageration even according to that graph.
Balance? I see no reason why there should be as many snail darters or spotted owls as humans.
What a way to fudge the numbers, to add in livestock and pets, and exclude insects and invertibrates.
pronatalist 4 years ago
A balance has nothing to do with equal #'s --- it has to do with not causing mass extinction of the earth's species. (and God saw all that he created and God said it was very good!)
You also don't seem to understand that we can not survive on a planet that is void of life. Nature does 100's of billions of dollars worth of services for free - we would go bankrupt if we try to reproduce natures services. (go learn about this)
ShalomYal 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
To ShalomYal:
Who's talking of getting rid of life? The anti-people population phobics? God intended that life, especially human life, to be-come ABUNDANT.
Read the part in the new book, "Climate Confusion" by Roy Spencer, about the Climate Modelers Versus the Meteorologists, pages 86-87. The latter is more inclined to view the climate (or nature?) as self-regulating, not trying to force nature into simplistic flawed "models" and then having over-arrogance and over-confidence in flimsy models.
pronatalist 3 years ago
Yes human pop. growth should be priority #1. Where can I see the rest of this lecture?
ShalomYal 4 years ago
This is so important. Though I don't believe in abortion but I do believe in population control. People should be banned from having more that one child....
bigsurjune 4 years ago
I do not believe in human population control, as that is obviously against freedom and dignity. If people want to breed so much (as I also want a "large" family), let them populate the planet more densely and efficiently. Let them live and breed in closer proximity to their neighbors, if ever necessary to find or make room for so many.
Religion and human reproductive urges tell us to enlarge the human race for the greater good of the many.
pronatalist 4 years ago
I'm an American living in Tokyo. You should move here because you would lose that naivety.
bigsurjune 4 years ago 2
I've lived in the small town, the countryside, and the big city, and I think I like the big city best. Of course any of those will do, as a place to live.
"One of the best things we can do for future generations is to have lots of children. How else can they be born?" Pronatalist
pronatalist 4 years ago
That's fine but come live in Tokyo to see how "great" it is. Your images of the masses living in harmony will be smashed--unless you think that manners, courtesy, humility, and thoughtfulness aren't important for societies....
bigsurjune 4 years ago
Of course manners, courtesy, humility, and thoughtfulness matter. I consider promoting such social graces, a proper part of pronatalism. If more people are to enjoy living at once, together, then hadn't we also purposely be nice to each other? A kind and friendly society can far more easily, live more vastly and densely and efficiently together, for the greater good of the many. And social graces should make it easier to relax and welcome our babies to naturally push out.
pronatalist 4 years ago
Well, pronatalist, my suggestion is for you to move to Tokyo for a year or two, so you can see what it's like to live in a densely populated urban sprawl. After one year of riding the train to work and back you might just change your thinking....
bigsurjune 4 years ago