Another reason to switch to clean natural gas. We are going to go down as the dumbest punch of folks in history if we keep paying for this imported oil. We have all the natural gas we need right here, lets use it.
@Mshepshep: particulate is a result of fossil fuel combustion, even on the nano scale. Give the nature of the combustion process it is impossible to insure continuous complete conversion with varying fuel source inputs, i.e. the car throttling up or down. Natural gas, and all other combustion based "clean" and sustainable technologies still produce particulate as a byproduct. Though it MIGHT reduce the cost to the consumer and reduce foreign dependency, the help impact would be negligible.
@jtg001 CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (l) The oxidation of methane leaves two products, water and plant food (CO2). Methane is a single carbon molecule. It is not a chain and thus does have the opportunity to break down into other smaller chains. Read some peer reviewed research papers and you will begin to see that combustion of methane is MUCH cleaner than oil. Besides, if we don't use this in our vehicles, methane is 72 TIMES more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2.
@Mshepshep: Ugh. Yes, lets always assume perfect combustion and through round things we learned in high school. Nevermind that well known fact that combustion is a complex electron exchange mechanism littered with questions about flame characteristics and compostion. Unless you wanna site someone in particular, don't use that "peer review" cop-out while failing to defend your point. This was (and one could argue still is) my field of study. Lastly, natural gas is not JUST methane.
@Mshepshep: Also, a strange argument you make at the end: "use it or destroy the world." Now lets look at another problem: clean verse energetic. Sadly, methane, which is a simpler fuel therefore easier to predict the emissions types, is also not as energetically dense as diesel... which is still less dense than, say, bunker oil (what tanker ships use). However, these more energetic fuels are also "dirtier" and so have heavier emission regulations (except ships, until recently).
@Mshepshep: Finally... really, last one, I wonder where you got the notion that we have all the natural gas we need? This I have no study in. Anything I know is anecdotal at best. However, I'm mostly certain that natural gas production has been fairly stagnant for a while and we are pretty much passed peak production for all fossil fuels. However, bio-fuels I do know about...so if you got questions about them and emissions, I think I could answer. Otherwise, we are talking in circles.
The best chemical weapon to use, if you want to destroy your enemy is to make him pollute his cities with different means. At least this is what I can guess from the video...
We have to blame the people who INVENTED plastic bottles,WHICH made more and more and more and more and more componys open up so theres Plastic Devils every where! then we blame the people who invented Thee Inventor!! The Factory! WE SUE THEM FOR 89 Quaddrillion dollars! Then we blame US FOR SCREWING UP THE WHOLE WORLD!!!!
Wonderful... THANK YOU GREEDY OIL MOTHER FUCKERS. YOU ARE SUCCESSFULLY KILLING THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE BY PUTTING A STRANGLEHOLD ON CLEANER AND MORE EFFICIENT TRAVEL METHODS.
God I love how evil humans can be, all for the sake of profit. Fucking deuchebag assholes that made the electric car a forgotten memory. Everyone file lawsuits against these corrupt bastards, and claim that because they shunned new technology and made everyone use their nasty gasoline, now we all have terminal diseases.
did u know that someone invented a car that ran on pure water, nothing else, but a gasoline company bought it and refuses to market it becuase it would put them out of buisness.
no i didnt because it is not true.. think of it someone invented a car that ran on pure water imagine how much money he would make from marketing that car... the oil companies could not posibly pay him that much. and if a car could run purely on water i doubt only one person know would how to make that kind of car.
he didn't build it, he designed it. he designed the basis of a hydro cell car decades ago. we have them now but they are prototypes and could be tenfold in efficiency if the origional design had not been bought out
well, making a profit is the only reason to go into business. our economy is based on that principle. so doing anything to make money is technically ok because our economic system supports it. but i agree with you, all people want is money
Chemtrails!!! EPA is complicit, anyone who understands the Control Systems knows this.
UncoveringConscious 8 months ago
Yes, ok, but let's focus on the real problem. Those evil smokers!
rattaplan 1 year ago
IAQ Indoor Air Quality Digital Magazine
hvacsmartsystems . com/iqa/
HVACSmartSystems 1 year ago
Another reason to switch to clean natural gas. We are going to go down as the dumbest punch of folks in history if we keep paying for this imported oil. We have all the natural gas we need right here, lets use it.
Mshepshep 1 year ago
@Mshepshep: particulate is a result of fossil fuel combustion, even on the nano scale. Give the nature of the combustion process it is impossible to insure continuous complete conversion with varying fuel source inputs, i.e. the car throttling up or down. Natural gas, and all other combustion based "clean" and sustainable technologies still produce particulate as a byproduct. Though it MIGHT reduce the cost to the consumer and reduce foreign dependency, the help impact would be negligible.
jtg001 1 year ago
@jtg001 CH4 (g) + 2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (l) The oxidation of methane leaves two products, water and plant food (CO2). Methane is a single carbon molecule. It is not a chain and thus does have the opportunity to break down into other smaller chains. Read some peer reviewed research papers and you will begin to see that combustion of methane is MUCH cleaner than oil. Besides, if we don't use this in our vehicles, methane is 72 TIMES more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2.
Mshepshep 3 months ago
@Mshepshep: Ugh. Yes, lets always assume perfect combustion and through round things we learned in high school. Nevermind that well known fact that combustion is a complex electron exchange mechanism littered with questions about flame characteristics and compostion. Unless you wanna site someone in particular, don't use that "peer review" cop-out while failing to defend your point. This was (and one could argue still is) my field of study. Lastly, natural gas is not JUST methane.
jtg001 2 months ago
@Mshepshep: Also, a strange argument you make at the end: "use it or destroy the world." Now lets look at another problem: clean verse energetic. Sadly, methane, which is a simpler fuel therefore easier to predict the emissions types, is also not as energetically dense as diesel... which is still less dense than, say, bunker oil (what tanker ships use). However, these more energetic fuels are also "dirtier" and so have heavier emission regulations (except ships, until recently).
jtg001 2 months ago
@Mshepshep: Finally... really, last one, I wonder where you got the notion that we have all the natural gas we need? This I have no study in. Anything I know is anecdotal at best. However, I'm mostly certain that natural gas production has been fairly stagnant for a while and we are pretty much passed peak production for all fossil fuels. However, bio-fuels I do know about...so if you got questions about them and emissions, I think I could answer. Otherwise, we are talking in circles.
jtg001 2 months ago
Indeed, ultra fine particles need to be regulated ASAP.
InfiniteUniverse88 2 years ago 5
Excellent film. Concies and very informative. Well done. Thanks.
digiroj 2 years ago
My song "It Was Madness" on YouTube is on the same subject.. "It's killing babies and the Human Race. Do I need to say it's a damn disgrace?"
digiroj 2 years ago
isn't it so ironical that the supposedly most intelligent race on this earth is the very thing that destroys it.
i say supposedly most intelligent is because i doubt there is any other species out there that is purposely destroying ITSELF!!
notverysuperdean 2 years ago
Get a hepa filter people, best protection used in laboratories for class 4 danger
MrSpanks234 2 years ago
The best chemical weapon to use, if you want to destroy your enemy is to make him pollute his cities with different means. At least this is what I can guess from the video...
vendetta007mike 2 years ago
Please cover updates on this issue that affects all our health. Thx.
TheSingingNewsNetwrk 2 years ago
Is this the reason for increased asthma/bronchitis infections? :-(
Modacolorist 2 years ago
We have to blame the people who INVENTED plastic bottles,WHICH made more and more and more and more and more componys open up so theres Plastic Devils every where! then we blame the people who invented Thee Inventor!! The Factory! WE SUE THEM FOR 89 Quaddrillion dollars! Then we blame US FOR SCREWING UP THE WHOLE WORLD!!!!
Beardactal 2 years ago
Where do you get those air masks?[the one from the cyclist?]
lionessimba 2 years ago
dude, airmasks are useless against ultra fine particals. sorry for that news
SynesthesicVision 2 years ago
That sucks. really bad.
lionessimba 2 years ago
hai all
gomatik 3 years ago
Wonderful... THANK YOU GREEDY OIL MOTHER FUCKERS. YOU ARE SUCCESSFULLY KILLING THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE BY PUTTING A STRANGLEHOLD ON CLEANER AND MORE EFFICIENT TRAVEL METHODS.
God I love how evil humans can be, all for the sake of profit. Fucking deuchebag assholes that made the electric car a forgotten memory. Everyone file lawsuits against these corrupt bastards, and claim that because they shunned new technology and made everyone use their nasty gasoline, now we all have terminal diseases.
staphinfection 3 years ago 9
yup
kk3j1l31dsi91e3 3 years ago
Never again I hope.
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
did u know that someone invented a car that ran on pure water, nothing else, but a gasoline company bought it and refuses to market it becuase it would put them out of buisness.
SamdeSquirell 3 years ago
no i didnt because it is not true.. think of it someone invented a car that ran on pure water imagine how much money he would make from marketing that car... the oil companies could not posibly pay him that much. and if a car could run purely on water i doubt only one person know would how to make that kind of car.
83679 3 years ago
he didn't build it, he designed it. he designed the basis of a hydro cell car decades ago. we have them now but they are prototypes and could be tenfold in efficiency if the origional design had not been bought out
SamdeSquirell 3 years ago
o so he never invented it lol he just had a design pretty big difference :/ and yea i agree mother fucking gasoline companys soo greedy
83679 3 years ago
well, making a profit is the only reason to go into business. our economy is based on that principle. so doing anything to make money is technically ok because our economic system supports it. but i agree with you, all people want is money
nul003 3 years ago
pretty sweet
Shultzy1992 3 years ago
I love the shot at the end.
Guy riding his bike wearing a respirator.
DriftingMunki 3 years ago
whoa
nuvius 3 years ago