I have recently jumped off the Obama band wagon and on to Ron Pauls. Aside from their differences on many issues, I've watched many Interviews and speeches of theirs and what I can't help but notice is how Obama dances around uncomfortable questions and answers ithem by steering the attention into a slightly different direction(basically bullshitting). Ron Paul answers questions without hestiation, even ones about things the CFR and NAU and NWO
We need to End the Federal Reserve. It is NOT Federal, and there is no Reserve. Also bring the troops home, ending this Empire and rather than police everyone, protect the Union. Dr. Congressman Ron Paul supports real change!
Actually, having too much government has been the problem in the last 20 years in our nation with the rise "compasionate conservatism" and left wing Hamiltonianism. (I would argue even longer) Look at Fanny Mae Freddy Mac bailout, 40 billion dollar departments created in the 1980's and 1990's defeat terrorism that wasn't defeated, the Department of Homeland Security,etc. lalexfanRoy, your basically saying the answer to our problems is the problem itself.
look, poor naive, misguided people. I like Ron Paul. In a calmer time, I'd imagine Ron Paul could possibly make an excellent president. Certainly better than 99.99% of the bozos I've seen out there. But in a time of this type of crisis, Barack Obama has shown himself to have EXACTLY the type of judgement and foresight this country needs. And big goverment spending is the ONLY thing that will help the economy RIGHT NOW. Ron Paul would put us under, being the MOST conservative of the bunch
@Sigrafix Alex Jones has bad intentions. The government took out William Cooper truthteller so that Alex Jones who works for the globalist; telling 90% truth to lie about the crucial 10% truth. Ron Paul is a slam dunk Mason who also works for the globlist; part of the agenda and also Luciferian as evidence shows. We have NO ONE in the news nor in Politics that is on our side. All are setting us up.
Ron Paul is for small government. Barack Obama supports big wasteful government. Barack Obama brings more socialism than we already have. Ron Paul is the beacon of light for liberty and the constitution.
Get the message out to your friends! We have got to get as many young people informed of REAL CHANGE!
Get involved!! It is night and day between Obama and Ron Paul. Ron defends it, and Obama violates it. If Obama's idea of change is to vote YES to an UNCONSTITUTIONAL $700 Billion bailout, then something is completely WRONG!!
First I would like to tell you that I respect you interest in our country's political process.
I was elected by my caucus as a Republican and I agree with Ron Paul on many issues. Foreign policy to name one. But Ron Paul is of the Republican party which I personally feel has lost its vision of what is good for the people in favor of what is good for the party.
To Ron Paul's credit he exposed the waste in the military over seas. John McCain would never vote to decrease spending on military.
You girls are intelligent, charming, and make excellent videos, but I encourage you to make them with better-quality audio; the message is lost in the white noise and in-and-out sound.
Yes,I already did. He was full of bula.Has no idea what he was doing and was just being politically correct. The WAR ON DRUGS most be stop. It is a waste of good money, and inconsitent with what we know works.The pressure from the public most come.A lot of it is already going toward his VP. Ron Raul is correct, so was Gravel.We got to work with what we have for president.WE ARE THE PEOPLE.THEY MUST SERVE US.ALL OF THIS WASTE OF MONEY.START BY GETTING A DRUG CZAR LIKE ETHAN NADELMANN.
obama voted for the fisa bill, he voted to fund the war in the tune of 80 billion, he voted to reinstate the patriot act. obama is NOT change and everyone with a brain knows that.
you suck as a debater not even once do you mention the other half of this equation .Hello MCcain look at choices you ninny.MCbush or Oboma who tells you bs about changing the 8 years of American loss. R.P is gone 4 08 and that sucks but that doesn't mean his word cant be spread. But this one is way to big, way to important and Mcain is not what this country needs.So dont go preaching your one sided FOX news commentary and think that it counts 4 sheiza!!!
Ok, I voted for Baldwin. Now what? Now what? Does he win? Does Baldwin really win? If he doesnt win, who does? McCain most likely. Do I want McCain in office? Do I really want McCain in White House? I agree that with Obama there is a chance US will go into another war. However, with McCain (& his right hand man, Joe Lieberman) you can almost GUARANTEE another war. If you guys do wish to proceed that way and want that to happen, then sure. Go for it!
He wants to allow local levels to decide what should be taught in their schools, and if some small town in texas wants pseudo science taught in their schools, they should be able to. His whole platform is that he and the federal government should not be allowed to make peoples decisions for them, so you are wrong by saying that he wants it taught in schools, he just happens to believe in it himself.
B. Ron Paul's governmental model is a disaster. The "100% free market" is the biggest villain of them all! Corporations will NOT, and NEVER HAVE done the right thing when actually given a choice. They NEED to be controlled.
That's not true. You're are confusing Capitalism with Corporatism. If companies are allowed to prosper and do business freely, that's a free market system that does work. If corporations are allowed, by things like NAFTA and other faux "free trade" agreements, to break the rules and exploit the free market, that is corporatism, which doesn't work.
The only way a true monopoly is formed is if government sets regulation, or gives them power. A monopoly cannot survive without help from the government, so your idea of corporations running wild is unrealistic. Free market economies always allow competition, as long as government follows the constitution. I also disagree with you about government, I am much more afraid of a powerful government than I am of a powerful corporation, governments have the power to incarcerate.
C. Norway almost the best education in the world, one of the highest standards of living, extremely low crime and drug rates, all with extremely high taxes, and free governmental health care, college and other programs. Almost all of Europe is a hell of a lot more Left then America, and we've reaping the consequences.
True, but Norway cannot reasonably be described as socialist, either. Most places describe it as a Constitutional monarchy with an overseeing parliament. True, most of Europe is more socially liberal than the United States is, but they aren't Socialist.
Norway's education system works better than ours, mainly because it's a mix of public education and privatization that allows for more educational freedom, unlike our very socialistic system that is controlled mostly by the Federal government.
there is no problem with education, parents just do not raise their kids properly, and I do not see a problem with that. I someone does not want to learn, let them, and I will take the better job. What you do not have a right to do is get upset about it, and ask your government to take more of my money just to invest in more failure children.The beautiful thing about america is that stupid children do not physically harm you, so the government does not steal money from you to fix a non problem
Wow, never read such a worse comment about the school districts. You really need to check your sources on why schools are failing...SERIOUSLY, you're way off.
Schools are not failing. They are a free service provided by the government where children are given an chance to learn. If a child chooses to learn, then he or she will. Of course, if your goal is for every child to learn, then public schools will not do a very good job, because they have no incentive, and they have no authority to force you to learn. This is the difference between public and private sector. My school teaches much more advanced topics than the local catholic school.superserial
A. Ron Paul has shown us his religious agenda over and over again. He Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999) He describes himself as "Very Pro-Life". He doesn't believe in Evolution, and thinks his religion should be taught in schools. He even Supports a Constitutional Amendment for school prayer!
First, abortion is not, and never will be, a religious issue. It's a matter of rights, a matter of the child's freedom to live.
Second, Ron Paul's personal beliefs have nothing to do with his political votes. He does not think that religious should be taught in schools, and he doesn't support a Constitutional Amendment for prayer, because one isn't needed.
Look guys, Im myself first & foremost Ron Paul supporter. I too zero interest in democrats until NH (Ron received less than 10% in IA,NH).Disappointed I realized he wont make it. Then i looked @ other republican candidates who all looked mere reflection of Rudy. Thats when I 1st time turned towards democrats & found Obama 1 of the better option. Guys I know we all prefer Ron. But lets act smart. A vote 4 Barr/ Baldwin is a vote for Mccain. Do u guys really want Mccain? Please think. Vote Obama.
That's foolishness. Obama and Paul are completely different... Obama supports the Patriot Act, war in Iran, staying in Afghanistan, not to mention huge increases in Federal power. Obama is part of the problem. Please, please reconsider your choice! The lesser of two evils is still evil!
I wouldn't vote for Baldwin if I were you. His philosophy basically is: liberty, unless it interferes with his extremist religious beliefs.
For example: he favors banning gambling (!) because he claims it damages the "family." Oh how Christians fetishize the "family." He also rails about the "homosexual agenda" in Washington (collectivism much?) and I don't believe he's 100% against the war on drugs. I have a feeling he'd support a nationwide ban on abortion too. Hardly libertarian.
And I'm not a full Libertarian, but I would suggest looking more into some of his positions. Don't believe everything you've heard, and don't think that he stands for everything the Constitution Party does. I would hardly call Southern Baptist an extreme religion, but I understand your concern. I'd ask that you look more into him and what he stands for.
Ok, I voted for Baldwin. Now what? Now what? Does he win? Does Baldwin really win? If he doesnt win, who does? McCain most likely. Do I want McCain in office? Do I really want McCain in White House? I agree that with Obama there is a chance US will go into another war. However, with McCain (& his right hand man, Joe Lieberman) you can almost GUARANTEE another war. If you guys do wish to proceed that way and want that to happen, then sure. Go for it!
No Doubt, if you are a true Ron Paul nut job such as myself you must vote independent or libertarian! Not all states will have these candidates on the ballot, but definately vote Libertarian if you can!
Barack Obama is the opposite of Ron Paul. Support for Obama translates to support for a government over the people and support for Dr. Paul translates into support for the people over the government.
Well, you see Dixie, I support a lot of what Ron Paul's doing.
However, I believe he has a disgusting secret religious motive. He's a creationist, for god's sake. I cannot have some as scary as a Creationist in the white house.
Plus, I'm a Socialist. Ron Paul has some good ideas, but there are some things we'll never see eye to eye on. I'm for giving some power to the states, as long as it has nothing to do with homosexual rights, abortion, and science education.
You see, I believe that if power is given to the states, many states will make the VERY wrong choices. I shudder at thinking about what the wackos in the South will turn their states into.
The post below was meant to be a continuation but the first post didn't go through. Anyway, it went something like this: Obama is a Globalist, he has done nothing in the senate. Look at his "present" votes. The only meaningful legislation he has ever submitted is the Global Poverty Act.
Thanks for commenting :). You're absolutely right - in addition to what you mentioned about his Global Poverty Act, it would also place a tax on carbon emissions which would be sent to the UN, which is how it would involve "global poverty".
The Global Poverty Act would commit the US to make efforts to reduce, by half, the number of people in the world living on less than $1 a day. It sound good, until you read the rest of it. It will place limits on firearms(how this helps the poor, I don't know), we will have to sign the Kyoto treaty (again, how is this related to poverty?), and will commit us to 800 and some billion dollars in foreign aid, in addition to what we already give. No, Obama is nothing like Ron Paul.
where can i find friends like you ! lol all my friends think im a SMART ASS or don't even listen to me when i tell them that obama is not really for "CHANGE" people are dumb
Change from the current Bush administration... can only be a good thing. Therefore I submit: change. New man. Slightly more liberal ideas. Perhaps not as good at Kucinich, but eh. Good luck with Paul running as an independent. :)
i donated money to both the obama and the paul campaign because i like their style of politics.. i recognize their differences, and i think they would make great leaders..i have to admit i prefer obama
ps.. even though obama voted for an extension of the patriot act, he has also voted for many provisions removing or limiting the powers of the patriot act.. go on his fact checker to see his record on the patriot act
Do your friends know that Obama has voiced support for sending troops to the Sudan, Pakistan, even Iran.
Ron Paul would move to end the drug war, which kills far more people than the Iraq war every year.
Nevada is on the verge of having a majority of delegates supporting Ron Paul at the Republican convention. Montana and Washington state may also. He won MY county.
Is there any chance you could get a better mic...I honestly cant hear you very well at all and I really believe a better mic will increase your viewers a lot more.
I hate to say it but Maya 12/21/2012 date IS THE START OF A New Age... NEW WORLD ORDER? (NaU, EU, AfrU, AsiU) "They" (Elite BIG money investors) control the majority of shares in the PRIVATE BANK (FED RES), like Rothschild Rockafeller among others. Their grandfathers and fathers drafted and "LOBBIED" (BRIBE!) to pass this. You wanna know how to keep up the R[love]ution? DON'T PAY INCOME TAX! If you want me to explain let me know. Peace
Mike Gravel is about the only sane person still in the race. He would get my vote if I was american. Libertarian party isn't corrupt to the core unlike the other two. Voting Obama won't bring about any kind of change.
I respect Mike Gravel for his views on the war and few other issues, but couldn't vote for him because of abortion and his ideas about direct democracy. Either way, you're right, Obama's "change" is just an illusion.
I respect Mike Gravel for his views on the war and few other issues, but couldn't vote for him because of abortion and his ideas about direct democracy. Either way, you're right, Obama's "change" is just an illusion.
Ah, no. I inform myself before insulting anyone, although I don't remember insulting you. It's not that people who don't like Ron Paul are uninformed, they're propably just better informed and not extremist right-wing nuts. You went from campaigning for bush to paul, it's hard to tell which one is worse. But who knows, maybe you'll be a raving socialist one day.
How am I an extreme right wing nut? I didn't say you insulted me; you make statements about Ron Paul that you don't back up with any facts. What don't you like about him?
I campaigned for Bush at the ages of 10 and 14, and yes, I realize I was wrong.
I highly doubt that I'll become a socialist, if I were, I'd most certainly be voting for Obama.
He's dogmatic and delusional, which shows in his historical revisionism and ignorance towards scientific facts. Regarding foreign policy he just insane, he wants to get out of the UN and the NATO. He's learned absolutely nothing from the holocaust, rwanda, etc.
He wants to dismantle all workers rights, workers have fought decades for acceptable working conditions. The US has a very violent labour history. Shall the throw all those victories away for some nut?
Just wondering why you think we need the UN to address injustices. Hmmm, the US (with the backing of congress)teaming with other contries as needed on an issue by issue basis OR the corrupt, global government minded UN spending our money and telling us which battles we are going to fight.
Thanks for your video. If there is no option to vote for Ron Paul, voting for Obama "might" be the least of all evils.
I say that because we need to return some "basic" forms of liberal democracy like habeas corpus. He's expressly said he will not invade Iran where McCain and Clinton would. So Obama 's the choice of sanity versus insanity.
Really I agree with you though. But I don't see the alternative (besides Ron Paul) if you're going to stick within the conventional political system.
You got to be crazy, twashing! The least of all evils? Yeah, right! Why don't you check out Obama's 28% Capital Gains tax and the Obama's Sponsorship legislation that is trying to pass the legislation, so Americans can fork over $850 billion to Global Poverty when our own country is going down the tubes???
I think you're mistaken; Obama hasn't promised not to invade Iran. I agree, Clinton and McCain are both quite insane ;). However, Obama is just globalism in a prettier package. I don't have room in this comment to list all the reasons I don't support him.
There isn't an alternative within the Democratic or Republican parties. If I was worried about voting for someone who might not win, I wouldn't have supported Ron Paul. Personally, I'm considering Constitution party this year.
its not hard to see why ron paul supporters are now supporting barack obama. cuz paul has repeatedly said if he is not on the republican ballot he will withdraw from the election, that leaves basically 3: mccain, nader, and clinton/obama. nader will not have a shot to win, mccain is another bush, and clinton is another clinton. that leaves obama as the only other choice. it's not that ron paul supporters are supporting obama, it's that they are supporting someone other than who the media wants
I would hardly say that Obama is the one that the media doesn't like...
Obama, Clinton and McCain are all horrendous choices, and Nader is simply a distraction. If Ron Paul supporters are true to their values, they'll know better than to support Obama.
I would hardly say that Obama is the one that the media doesn't like...
Obama, Clinton and McCain are all horrendous choices, and Nader is simply a distraction. If Ron Paul supporters are true to their values, they'll know better than to support Obama.
you do not know what you are talking about. if the government does not spend, we'll go back to the days when only the business ruled, which brough about the Big Depression. study history kid and you'll see what an idiot you are
That's not true, the great Depression was brought on by a number of factors, not one of them lack of government spending. Lack of Federal spending has absolutely nothing to do with big business being in control - you, sir, need to do your research before you make arrogant, ignorant and rude claims.
sorry Dixie, I feel an honor and pleasure that you responded. Truely sorry, but one of the issues so dear to me is what the goverment can do for people, because the business comunity will never provide a permanent and meaningful job for every body. what is your position on that?
The government has no right to get involved in private business. It's not our job, as taxpayers, to pay the bills of people who don't work, or to make sure someone's job is meaningful. Communism has never worked in practice.
Our economy IS crumbling, but for a number of reasons - inflation and loss of the value of the dollar, the cost of the Iraq war, and yes - increased Federal spending. People can't find jobs because we're in a recession, and more spending won't help that.
there are different areas of Federal spending, some might hurt and others lift the economy. I am about to get my bachelor degree in math this semester and I have study Macro-econmics and a lot of History, and what you are proposing is going back to the times when government 'was not involved' and there was so much misary and even children were workers. then came the Big Deppression, and the Democrats and Progressive ideas 'fixed' that mess through 'Federal' spending on needed people and.....
Perhaps you might look into the real reasons why the great depression happened..ie the recall of margin loans with no notice to the general public resulting in massives numbers of banks foreclosing, and how about the inflation of the money supply by the federal
reserve and subsequent,purposeful deflation by the federal reserve.Both instances greatly contributed to the depression of the economy, and it was all directed by a few insiders who had foreknowledge of the event.Look into it...
Fancy words. Let me put it to you very simply so every body understands. THE MADAFUCKER CONSERVATIVE RICH HAD ALL THE MONEY AND NO MONEY WAS GOING AROUND FOR MANY.
The gold standard isn't really outdated, we've only been off it since the 70's and wince then, inflation has exploded. It's not just the gold standard - it's the Federal Reserve as well. Having a Central bank is one of the ten planks of Communism, and the Fed is destroying the economy.
you look fine. One of these past days my friend called me a bitch. that's is a new trend, so I laughed when he called me that. Sorry about my words. I am 52, but I looked good and young.
Ron Paul? never heard of him. Just kidding, but he has a snow ball's chance in hell to become president. what you don't like about democrats?
Please America for your own sake, vote Ron Paul into power! Obama will just do whatever the powers that be make him. Paul has shown that he is prepared to vote against the powers that be.
Yes, I do support immediate withdrawal. We just marched in, we can just march out. Our presense is inciting violence in the region, and I don't see how leaving would make us vulnerable - I think that continuing to stay in an endless war endangers us more than anything.
"Democracy is a form of government that cannot long survive, for as soon as the people learn that they have a voice in the fiscal policies of the government, they will move to vote for themselves all the money in the treasury, and bankrupt the nation."
Karl Marx
Socialism/communism is comming with either Obama or Clinton. Sorry to say this but I don't think we can get a Libertarian into office. I don't want to vote for McCain but given the choices he the best we got and it really sucks.
Thanks for that inspiring video. I'm a Ron Paul delegate to my state's Republican convention. Lot's of our resolutions passed at the local level. Keep up the fight. Freedom is worth it.
You're welcome, thank you for getting involved and becoming a delegate! It's always inspiring to meet Patriots who are willing to help change the country :)
I think I love you, even though I'm old enough to be your grandpa... It's just wonderful to see young people like yourself actually thinking. You give us hope for the next generation.
no offense, but its kinda hard to understand what u're saying...anyways the only reason why I support Barack Obama instead of Ron Paul is because Ron has no chance of winning.
But yes, it would be very nice if Ron Paul was in the office.
I'm sorry if I was unclear; I have many reasons to support Ron Paul and NOT Obama, most of which I couldn't get into in five minutes.
No offense, but that's a horrible, dangerous reason to not support someone. That's HOW the media controls the elections - they repeat the mantra "he won't win!" and people vote on popularity. How many people said "Ron Paul won't win"? What if all those people had actually voted for him?
Never put your name next to somebody you don't fully understand. You are wasting your vote when you vote for someone who doesn't support the constitution. Obama is a warmonger who wants war with Iran. How much does your vote really count? Do you think that voting for someone who is winning is going to make a difference? Like your one vote will change the world and the election? Give me a break. Vote for the person that's best, never waste your vote on the top tier propped up bs candidates!
Well, I wasn't old enough to vote in the primaries...
Well, not necessarily, but by most accounts yes - he can't get the nomination. But I don't *have* to have a second choice. McCain, Obama and Clinton are all equally bad, and I won't vote against my conscience or for someone who has no respect for the Constitution.
"anyways the only reason why I support Barack Obama instead of Ron Paul is because Ron has no chance of winning."
Thats just sad. You DO understand how democracy works right? THIS ISNT FOOTBALL, and if the person you vote for doesnt win, you dont "lose". You vote with your conscience, even if you are the only person to do so.
Do you understand how fundamentally flawed your mindset is? How that actually undermines the concept of democracy? Please wake up, we need your help.
Even though I agree with you guys,but voting for Ron will not fully meet your satisfaction either. Admit it, Ron Paul can't win anymore....it's too late.
Now consider this, what would you rather have in the office? Obama or McCain. For me, I rather have Obama because McCain is much more of a war guy than Obama.
Obama or McCain... How about neither? It's really not a chioce for me, because I think they'd be equally bad. Obama is just as much a globalist (he's said he wouldn't rule out going to war with Iran or Pakistan!) as McCain, he's just more eloquent and is against the unpopular Iraq war.
Obama's social policies are socialistic, too. That's not to say that I'd vote for McCain - he's quite liberal himself -but I'd definitely not prefer Obama.
Yes, and I agree he will be the "McSame" as Bush. You misunderstand Bush - he's the antithesis of what true Conservatism is/was. An aggressive foreign policy, taking away of Civil Liberties, increased Federal power - those things aren't Conservative! Over the past 8 years, George W. Bush has destroyed what it means to be a Republican; he is definitely NOT Conservative, and neither is McCain.
Well liberation theology or black liberation theology would explain his marxist views on government and these marxist were the ones who created liberation theology. The same theology Jeremiah Wright believes in and has give to Obama for the last 20 years. Just search up Liberation theology Obama and you will see what I mean. I don't think you would vote for a communsim or Socialism party.
Just listening to your education argument, only giving power to local officials will not help the education crisis. The problem is you have poor inner-city neighborhoods that cannot support schools because of a vast economic divide in this country. By doing what you suggest, you would just be ignoring a good portion of America.
Look at our current Federal education system (a redistribution of wealth sort of ideal) - there are still inner city underperforming school districts, in spite of all the Federal money they receive.
The District of Columbia's school district has received some of the highest Federal funding in the nation, yet it still is one of the lowest achieving. It's not just money that helps schools succeed, and it's wrong for the Government to dictate that some school districts pay for the others.
But there are thousands of schools that don't have the most basic materials that students would need to get a good education. This is not a debate about welfare where some people may be supporting a few slackers, but these are children who should get the same oppurtunity as everyone else.
The government will never be able to bring them this, only promises of it. Why is our country the richest in the world and why do we all have water and at least the basic necessities that other big government countries lack? It is because we didn't allow government oligopolies and monopolies. Because we didn't use big government to "fix" problems. Because we didn't centralize and federalize our power. The day the government becomes our parents is the day we lose our prosperity, or what's left.
Keep preaching against the controllers that are wrecking our nation. The neo-conservatives and economic liberals suck and are destroying our constitution and our free society! Americans unite for prosperity and liberty!
Barak Obama is not "anti-war".
JILampropoulos 2 years ago 4
Interesting videos you have. Although the sound is really bad at times.
bjorinn 2 years ago
I have recently jumped off the Obama band wagon and on to Ron Pauls. Aside from their differences on many issues, I've watched many Interviews and speeches of theirs and what I can't help but notice is how Obama dances around uncomfortable questions and answers ithem by steering the attention into a slightly different direction(basically bullshitting). Ron Paul answers questions without hestiation, even ones about things the CFR and NAU and NWO
boyyy007 2 years ago 4
We need to End the Federal Reserve. It is NOT Federal, and there is no Reserve. Also bring the troops home, ending this Empire and rather than police everyone, protect the Union. Dr. Congressman Ron Paul supports real change!
3DNC 3 years ago 14
Well said!
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Actually, having too much government has been the problem in the last 20 years in our nation with the rise "compasionate conservatism" and left wing Hamiltonianism. (I would argue even longer) Look at Fanny Mae Freddy Mac bailout, 40 billion dollar departments created in the 1980's and 1990's defeat terrorism that wasn't defeated, the Department of Homeland Security,etc. lalexfanRoy, your basically saying the answer to our problems is the problem itself.
FATToney12 3 years ago 2
look, poor naive, misguided people. I like Ron Paul. In a calmer time, I'd imagine Ron Paul could possibly make an excellent president. Certainly better than 99.99% of the bozos I've seen out there. But in a time of this type of crisis, Barack Obama has shown himself to have EXACTLY the type of judgement and foresight this country needs. And big goverment spending is the ONLY thing that will help the economy RIGHT NOW. Ron Paul would put us under, being the MOST conservative of the bunch
lalexfanroy 3 years ago
ya there such morons they voted for change ...suckers or just plan lazy ? the same people who fail to read the dotted lines for nafta ...patriot act
gasdorf 3 years ago 3
and what did you do? how did you distinguish yourself from the suckers and lazy folk?
rusH1023 3 years ago
Ron Paul is the true hero, so is Alex Jones
GVFX 3 years ago
Alex Jones is a nut. He may have good intentions but he spews just as much bullshit as he does truth. Please don't compare Dr. Paul to Mr. Jones.
Sigrafix 3 years ago 2
i agree
columbus63 3 years ago
@Sigrafix Alex Jones has bad intentions. The government took out William Cooper truthteller so that Alex Jones who works for the globalist; telling 90% truth to lie about the crucial 10% truth. Ron Paul is a slam dunk Mason who also works for the globlist; part of the agenda and also Luciferian as evidence shows. We have NO ONE in the news nor in Politics that is on our side. All are setting us up.
tgambill 1 year ago
im in love xD
theycallmenoots 3 years ago
these people are really funny if you say something good about obama they act like you just knifed ron paul
right now I am supporting the president
Conservativesaregood 3 years ago
Ron Paul is for small government. Barack Obama supports big wasteful government. Barack Obama brings more socialism than we already have. Ron Paul is the beacon of light for liberty and the constitution.
rothschild12 3 years ago 3
who the fuck is ron paul. Obama i spresident hahahahahahah bitches
wallacelanda 3 years ago
No way! I mean, I didn't like have a TV or anything to tell me that. You're so awesome that you keep up with current events that way.
No. You are a beautiful example of how our country will fall :)
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
You're right. Obama is the new Spresident. HAHAHAHAHA More of the same and more failing politics.
phil4eagle 3 years ago 5
I meant to say that Ron Paul defends (it)the Constitution while Obama violated it.
spaceagedevice 3 years ago 4
@spaceagedevice
Correction: "violates". Present tense.
Japhethite 3 years ago
Get the message out to your friends! We have got to get as many young people informed of REAL CHANGE!
Get involved!! It is night and day between Obama and Ron Paul. Ron defends it, and Obama violates it. If Obama's idea of change is to vote YES to an UNCONSTITUTIONAL $700 Billion bailout, then something is completely WRONG!!
spaceagedevice 3 years ago
when obama came to my town i stod outside the building with a ron paul sign next to the prolifers protesting his campaign...
a obama supporter came up to me and told me he liked ron paul and thought that because they were so similar that they would make a good team... WTF?
revgothlove 3 years ago
Glad to see some liberal Paul supporters. Nice video, but better quality next time around.
Mattboy2388 3 years ago
First I would like to tell you that I respect you interest in our country's political process.
I was elected by my caucus as a Republican and I agree with Ron Paul on many issues. Foreign policy to name one. But Ron Paul is of the Republican party which I personally feel has lost its vision of what is good for the people in favor of what is good for the party.
To Ron Paul's credit he exposed the waste in the military over seas. John McCain would never vote to decrease spending on military.
1CountryIndivisible 3 years ago
You girls are intelligent, charming, and make excellent videos, but I encourage you to make them with better-quality audio; the message is lost in the white noise and in-and-out sound.
Ron Paul is the man.
danielpmcguireesq 3 years ago
The order of things are:
1. A sound money, end the FED' and restore the control of our money back to congress.
and the rest will be good. AMEN.
SunnyDaysRFun 3 years ago 2
your a cutie! And you share my views! I'm in love....
vdubs4life1964 3 years ago
Obama has to Stop the Crazy War on Drugs too.This is way to crazy and it does not work.
Picaro1 3 years ago
He won't, though. Look at his VP's voting record...
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Yes,I already did. He was full of bula.Has no idea what he was doing and was just being politically correct. The WAR ON DRUGS most be stop. It is a waste of good money, and inconsitent with what we know works.The pressure from the public most come.A lot of it is already going toward his VP. Ron Raul is correct, so was Gravel.We got to work with what we have for president.WE ARE THE PEOPLE.THEY MUST SERVE US.ALL OF THIS WASTE OF MONEY.START BY GETTING A DRUG CZAR LIKE ETHAN NADELMANN.
Picaro1 3 years ago
The global poverty act is supported by dozens of leaders from both parties because it can wipe out malaria, tuberculosis, and save millions of lives.
The Global Polio Eradication Initiative cut polio cases from 350,000 per year in 1988 to 1,000 in 2004.
watch?v=JSBekNIFTeI
Most government spending increase is coming from social security, medicare, and medicaid. Letting the world's poor die isn't going to solve this.
Please visit my site for complex arguments for and against aid.
FightGlobalPoverty 3 years ago
ok,
obama voted for the fisa bill, he voted to fund the war in the tune of 80 billion, he voted to reinstate the patriot act. obama is NOT change and everyone with a brain knows that.
synthpopclassics 3 years ago 2
Chuck Baldwin 08!
dharmashapta 3 years ago 4
you suck as a debater not even once do you mention the other half of this equation .Hello MCcain look at choices you ninny.MCbush or Oboma who tells you bs about changing the 8 years of American loss. R.P is gone 4 08 and that sucks but that doesn't mean his word cant be spread. But this one is way to big, way to important and Mcain is not what this country needs.So dont go preaching your one sided FOX news commentary and think that it counts 4 sheiza!!!
/watch?v=GEtZlR3zp4c heres my other chice
phlashphil 3 years ago
Ok, I voted for Baldwin. Now what? Now what? Does he win? Does Baldwin really win? If he doesnt win, who does? McCain most likely. Do I want McCain in office? Do I really want McCain in White House? I agree that with Obama there is a chance US will go into another war. However, with McCain (& his right hand man, Joe Lieberman) you can almost GUARANTEE another war. If you guys do wish to proceed that way and want that to happen, then sure. Go for it!
stopthinkthenact 3 years ago
And on Norway/Europe: If free government healthcare, welfare, and college isn't socialism, what is?
toTheLimit777 3 years ago
Ron Paul supported H.J.RES.78, which would have introduced prayer into all public schools.
Ron Paul has publicly announced he wants his pseudo-science religion taught in schools. See here: watch?v=42n42J-gB_Y
Heck, on religious freedom, McCain(on all issues except Gay Marriage, where Paul is split) is better then Paul.
toTheLimit777 3 years ago
He wants to allow local levels to decide what should be taught in their schools, and if some small town in texas wants pseudo science taught in their schools, they should be able to. His whole platform is that he and the federal government should not be allowed to make peoples decisions for them, so you are wrong by saying that he wants it taught in schools, he just happens to believe in it himself.
enomarekim 3 years ago
B. Ron Paul's governmental model is a disaster. The "100% free market" is the biggest villain of them all! Corporations will NOT, and NEVER HAVE done the right thing when actually given a choice. They NEED to be controlled.
toTheLimit777 3 years ago
That's not true. You're are confusing Capitalism with Corporatism. If companies are allowed to prosper and do business freely, that's a free market system that does work. If corporations are allowed, by things like NAFTA and other faux "free trade" agreements, to break the rules and exploit the free market, that is corporatism, which doesn't work.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
The problem is, in a "free market" there are no rules. Corporations run wild like the wind. We've seen that in America's past and present.
In my opinion, corporations are much, much scarier then the government.
toTheLimit777 3 years ago
The only way a true monopoly is formed is if government sets regulation, or gives them power. A monopoly cannot survive without help from the government, so your idea of corporations running wild is unrealistic. Free market economies always allow competition, as long as government follows the constitution. I also disagree with you about government, I am much more afraid of a powerful government than I am of a powerful corporation, governments have the power to incarcerate.
enomarekim 3 years ago
C. Norway almost the best education in the world, one of the highest standards of living, extremely low crime and drug rates, all with extremely high taxes, and free governmental health care, college and other programs. Almost all of Europe is a hell of a lot more Left then America, and we've reaping the consequences.
toTheLimit777 3 years ago
True, but Norway cannot reasonably be described as socialist, either. Most places describe it as a Constitutional monarchy with an overseeing parliament. True, most of Europe is more socially liberal than the United States is, but they aren't Socialist.
Norway's education system works better than ours, mainly because it's a mix of public education and privatization that allows for more educational freedom, unlike our very socialistic system that is controlled mostly by the Federal government.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
there is no problem with education, parents just do not raise their kids properly, and I do not see a problem with that. I someone does not want to learn, let them, and I will take the better job. What you do not have a right to do is get upset about it, and ask your government to take more of my money just to invest in more failure children.The beautiful thing about america is that stupid children do not physically harm you, so the government does not steal money from you to fix a non problem
enomarekim 3 years ago
Wow, never read such a worse comment about the school districts. You really need to check your sources on why schools are failing...SERIOUSLY, you're way off.
Maire613 3 years ago
What are YOUR sources?
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Schools are not failing. They are a free service provided by the government where children are given an chance to learn. If a child chooses to learn, then he or she will. Of course, if your goal is for every child to learn, then public schools will not do a very good job, because they have no incentive, and they have no authority to force you to learn. This is the difference between public and private sector. My school teaches much more advanced topics than the local catholic school.superserial
enomarekim 3 years ago
As far as I'm concerned, Ron Paul has done much more to damage our liberties then Obama, and will continue to.
First, you must understand that a religious(Ron Paul's) agenda is the worst and scariest of all types of agendas.
2. you must learn the difference between government HELP and government control.
3. Ron Paul's corporation happy model is MUCH, MUCH scarier then even communism.
4, remember that the best countries in our world are socialist.
Linux7Master 3 years ago
Ron Paul doesn't have a religious agenda.
Government "help" always leads to government control. Look at the Federal education system, for example.
Please be more specific about what a "corporation happy model" is.
That's not true, and that's a very ambiguous and therefore unprovable statement. "Best"? How do you define that?
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
A. Ron Paul has shown us his religious agenda over and over again. He Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999) He describes himself as "Very Pro-Life". He doesn't believe in Evolution, and thinks his religion should be taught in schools. He even Supports a Constitutional Amendment for school prayer!
toTheLimit777 3 years ago
Wrong, wrong and wrong.
First, abortion is not, and never will be, a religious issue. It's a matter of rights, a matter of the child's freedom to live.
Second, Ron Paul's personal beliefs have nothing to do with his political votes. He does not think that religious should be taught in schools, and he doesn't support a Constitutional Amendment for prayer, because one isn't needed.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
And I agree with your main point on the video: the idea of a Ron Paul supporter voting for Obama is ridiculous.
coffeeintheface 3 years ago
Look guys, Im myself first & foremost Ron Paul supporter. I too zero interest in democrats until NH (Ron received less than 10% in IA,NH).Disappointed I realized he wont make it. Then i looked @ other republican candidates who all looked mere reflection of Rudy. Thats when I 1st time turned towards democrats & found Obama 1 of the better option. Guys I know we all prefer Ron. But lets act smart. A vote 4 Barr/ Baldwin is a vote for Mccain. Do u guys really want Mccain? Please think. Vote Obama.
stopthinkthenact 3 years ago
That's foolishness. Obama and Paul are completely different... Obama supports the Patriot Act, war in Iran, staying in Afghanistan, not to mention huge increases in Federal power. Obama is part of the problem. Please, please reconsider your choice! The lesser of two evils is still evil!
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
So who do you suggest I vote for?
stopthinkthenact 3 years ago
Chuck Baldwin :)
Baldwin08(dot)com
Myspace(dot)com / ChuckBaldwin2008
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
I wouldn't vote for Baldwin if I were you. His philosophy basically is: liberty, unless it interferes with his extremist religious beliefs.
For example: he favors banning gambling (!) because he claims it damages the "family." Oh how Christians fetishize the "family." He also rails about the "homosexual agenda" in Washington (collectivism much?) and I don't believe he's 100% against the war on drugs. I have a feeling he'd support a nationwide ban on abortion too. Hardly libertarian.
coffeeintheface 3 years ago
And I'm not a full Libertarian, but I would suggest looking more into some of his positions. Don't believe everything you've heard, and don't think that he stands for everything the Constitution Party does. I would hardly call Southern Baptist an extreme religion, but I understand your concern. I'd ask that you look more into him and what he stands for.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Ok, I voted for Baldwin. Now what? Now what? Does he win? Does Baldwin really win? If he doesnt win, who does? McCain most likely. Do I want McCain in office? Do I really want McCain in White House? I agree that with Obama there is a chance US will go into another war. However, with McCain (& his right hand man, Joe Lieberman) you can almost GUARANTEE another war. If you guys do wish to proceed that way and want that to happen, then sure. Go for it!
stopthinkthenact 3 years ago
anyone?
stopthinkthenact 3 years ago
Vote for whatever candidate who sticks to the Constitution. Obama has no clue and will say anything to 'sound good'. He is more of the same.
InTheSticks1881 3 years ago 3
So true. Glad you are one of the few who can see what Obama really is!
~Baldwin 2008
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
No Doubt, if you are a true Ron Paul nut job such as myself you must vote independent or libertarian! Not all states will have these candidates on the ballot, but definately vote Libertarian if you can!
LifeOrSomethinLikeIt 3 years ago
I disagree, the Libertarian ticket of Barr/Root is NOT Libertarian, and does not represent Ron Paul's views.
I'm voting for the Constitution Party nominee, Chuck Baldwin. He is truly the only candidate who carries on Ron Paul's message!
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Good job,
Obama is not better than bush/mccain, in fact I fear he may be nothing more than a a stooge of a new NWO block seizing power.
I highly recommend everyone check out the book 'Obama The Postmodern Coup' via amazon
veritasunleashed 3 years ago
Barack Obama is the opposite of Ron Paul. Support for Obama translates to support for a government over the people and support for Dr. Paul translates into support for the people over the government.
karn3022 3 years ago 2
Yep, that's exactly right. Thanks for commenting!
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Obama is NOT Ron Paul!
He is 100 times better.
Linux7Master 3 years ago
Gotta disagree with you there ;) At least you see the difference.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Well, you see Dixie, I support a lot of what Ron Paul's doing.
However, I believe he has a disgusting secret religious motive. He's a creationist, for god's sake. I cannot have some as scary as a Creationist in the white house.
Linux7Master 3 years ago
Isn't Barack Obama a Christian as well?
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Woa....
A Christian is something VERY, VERY different then a Creationist!
I believe Obama has found the exact spot to draw the line on his faith.
Linux7Master 3 years ago
Plus, I'm a Socialist. Ron Paul has some good ideas, but there are some things we'll never see eye to eye on. I'm for giving some power to the states, as long as it has nothing to do with homosexual rights, abortion, and science education.
You see, I believe that if power is given to the states, many states will make the VERY wrong choices. I shudder at thinking about what the wackos in the South will turn their states into.
Linux7Master 3 years ago
Linux7Master-
So you would rather have the Government tell you what to wear, believe, say etc..?
You are a typical commie globalist.
RePeNtOfSiNs 3 years ago
If people want to learn more about Obama's policies and how they compare/contrast to Ron Paul's policies...
Download Obama's "Blueprint for Change"
It says out his policies and values in specifics.
DLock04 3 years ago
YEAH..WHOEVER BUT NOT McCAIN
carlosfiriarte 3 years ago
The post below was meant to be a continuation but the first post didn't go through. Anyway, it went something like this: Obama is a Globalist, he has done nothing in the senate. Look at his "present" votes. The only meaningful legislation he has ever submitted is the Global Poverty Act.
clutch1245 3 years ago
Thanks for commenting :). You're absolutely right - in addition to what you mentioned about his Global Poverty Act, it would also place a tax on carbon emissions which would be sent to the UN, which is how it would involve "global poverty".
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
The Global Poverty Act would commit the US to make efforts to reduce, by half, the number of people in the world living on less than $1 a day. It sound good, until you read the rest of it. It will place limits on firearms(how this helps the poor, I don't know), we will have to sign the Kyoto treaty (again, how is this related to poverty?), and will commit us to 800 and some billion dollars in foreign aid, in addition to what we already give. No, Obama is nothing like Ron Paul.
clutch1245 3 years ago
where can i find friends like you ! lol all my friends think im a SMART ASS or don't even listen to me when i tell them that obama is not really for "CHANGE" people are dumb
chutubeme 3 years ago 2
Haha, I suppose you'll have to join your local Ron Paul meetup to find people like me :)
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Although being a cynic is fun.
Change from the current Bush administration... can only be a good thing. Therefore I submit: change. New man. Slightly more liberal ideas. Perhaps not as good at Kucinich, but eh. Good luck with Paul running as an independent. :)
lolbaker 3 years ago
i donated money to both the obama and the paul campaign because i like their style of politics.. i recognize their differences, and i think they would make great leaders..i have to admit i prefer obama
ps.. even though obama voted for an extension of the patriot act, he has also voted for many provisions removing or limiting the powers of the patriot act.. go on his fact checker to see his record on the patriot act
toyracers 3 years ago
Damn girl! You are smart, hot, and agree with me on every thing. -fuck Change, we need REVOLUTION
foxxg8r 3 years ago
Do your friends know that Obama has voiced support for sending troops to the Sudan, Pakistan, even Iran.
Ron Paul would move to end the drug war, which kills far more people than the Iraq war every year.
Nevada is on the verge of having a majority of delegates supporting Ron Paul at the Republican convention. Montana and Washington state may also. He won MY county.
kangalanatolian 3 years ago 2
Oh yes I forgot to say i totally agree with you. :)
VVendettaz 3 years ago 2
Is there any chance you could get a better mic...I honestly cant hear you very well at all and I really believe a better mic will increase your viewers a lot more.
VVendettaz 3 years ago
I'm working on getting a better one :)
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Ok I look forward to to the new and improved Hollywood sound versions :)
VVendettaz 3 years ago
I hate to say it but Maya 12/21/2012 date IS THE START OF A New Age... NEW WORLD ORDER? (NaU, EU, AfrU, AsiU) "They" (Elite BIG money investors) control the majority of shares in the PRIVATE BANK (FED RES), like Rothschild Rockafeller among others. Their grandfathers and fathers drafted and "LOBBIED" (BRIBE!) to pass this. You wanna know how to keep up the R[love]ution? DON'T PAY INCOME TAX! If you want me to explain let me know. Peace
alby711 3 years ago
wow, this girl knows her conservatives. right on, you go girl! Ron Paul = my hero.
ElCapitan1985 3 years ago
Thank you :)
R[evol]ution!
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Mike Gravel is about the only sane person still in the race. He would get my vote if I was american. Libertarian party isn't corrupt to the core unlike the other two. Voting Obama won't bring about any kind of change.
retroworm 3 years ago
I respect Mike Gravel for his views on the war and few other issues, but couldn't vote for him because of abortion and his ideas about direct democracy. Either way, you're right, Obama's "change" is just an illusion.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
I respect Mike Gravel for his views on the war and few other issues, but couldn't vote for him because of abortion and his ideas about direct democracy. Either way, you're right, Obama's "change" is just an illusion.
I'm voting for chuck baldwin.
jammasterjayfan 3 years ago
I might as well, my mind isn't made up yet though.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
thank god obama isn't ron paul. We don't need more loons.
Mockni 3 years ago
And people like you, sadly, are part of what's destroying the country.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Why? Because I don't vote for loonitarian nuts?
Mockni 3 years ago
Because you call people names instead of informing yourself.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Ah, no. I inform myself before insulting anyone, although I don't remember insulting you. It's not that people who don't like Ron Paul are uninformed, they're propably just better informed and not extremist right-wing nuts. You went from campaigning for bush to paul, it's hard to tell which one is worse. But who knows, maybe you'll be a raving socialist one day.
Mockni 3 years ago
How am I an extreme right wing nut? I didn't say you insulted me; you make statements about Ron Paul that you don't back up with any facts. What don't you like about him?
I campaigned for Bush at the ages of 10 and 14, and yes, I realize I was wrong.
I highly doubt that I'll become a socialist, if I were, I'd most certainly be voting for Obama.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
"What don't you like about him?"
He's dogmatic and delusional, which shows in his historical revisionism and ignorance towards scientific facts. Regarding foreign policy he just insane, he wants to get out of the UN and the NATO. He's learned absolutely nothing from the holocaust, rwanda, etc.
He wants to dismantle all workers rights, workers have fought decades for acceptable working conditions. The US has a very violent labour history. Shall the throw all those victories away for some nut?
Mockni 3 years ago
It would take me about a 100 comments to even get started.
Mockni 3 years ago
Make a video then. I want to know why. I don't want a person who went to a "church" who is Marxism friedly or watch?v=41bS3-F0Kqc.
manwihthat 3 years ago
Just wondering why you think we need the UN to address injustices. Hmmm, the US (with the backing of congress)teaming with other contries as needed on an issue by issue basis OR the corrupt, global government minded UN spending our money and telling us which battles we are going to fight.
superchris15 3 years ago
sorry, that comment was in response to the comment below by Mockni.
superchris15 3 years ago
Thanks for your video. If there is no option to vote for Ron Paul, voting for Obama "might" be the least of all evils.
I say that because we need to return some "basic" forms of liberal democracy like habeas corpus. He's expressly said he will not invade Iran where McCain and Clinton would. So Obama 's the choice of sanity versus insanity.
Really I agree with you though. But I don't see the alternative (besides Ron Paul) if you're going to stick within the conventional political system.
twashing2006 3 years ago
You got to be crazy, twashing! The least of all evils? Yeah, right! Why don't you check out Obama's 28% Capital Gains tax and the Obama's Sponsorship legislation that is trying to pass the legislation, so Americans can fork over $850 billion to Global Poverty when our own country is going down the tubes???
blicksflicks 3 years ago 2
I think you're mistaken; Obama hasn't promised not to invade Iran. I agree, Clinton and McCain are both quite insane ;). However, Obama is just globalism in a prettier package. I don't have room in this comment to list all the reasons I don't support him.
There isn't an alternative within the Democratic or Republican parties. If I was worried about voting for someone who might not win, I wouldn't have supported Ron Paul. Personally, I'm considering Constitution party this year.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
So do you still plan on voting for Ron Paul even though there is not even a chance he can win anymore?
ZTD28960 3 years ago
If there isn't a viable third party candidate then I will write-in Ron Paul, yes.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Right on, Dixie! That's what I'm going to, also!
blicksflicks 3 years ago 2
your audio keeps popping and buzzy like crazy. i couldn't understand any of it.
MrDeppness 3 years ago
Sorry =/. The sound on my computer is really weird, I'm trying to fix it.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
its not hard to see why ron paul supporters are now supporting barack obama. cuz paul has repeatedly said if he is not on the republican ballot he will withdraw from the election, that leaves basically 3: mccain, nader, and clinton/obama. nader will not have a shot to win, mccain is another bush, and clinton is another clinton. that leaves obama as the only other choice. it's not that ron paul supporters are supporting obama, it's that they are supporting someone other than who the media wants
xshawnyxboyx 3 years ago
I would hardly say that Obama is the one that the media doesn't like...
Obama, Clinton and McCain are all horrendous choices, and Nader is simply a distraction. If Ron Paul supporters are true to their values, they'll know better than to support Obama.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
well in reality, it doesn't matter. other than ron paul, they are all members of the cfr.
xshawnyxboyx 3 years ago
I would hardly say that Obama is the one that the media doesn't like...
Obama, Clinton and McCain are all horrendous choices, and Nader is simply a distraction. If Ron Paul supporters are true to their values, they'll know better than to support Obama.
You speak the truth.
jammasterjayfan 3 years ago 2
you do not know what you are talking about. if the government does not spend, we'll go back to the days when only the business ruled, which brough about the Big Depression. study history kid and you'll see what an idiot you are
jdgtitos 3 years ago
That's not true, the great Depression was brought on by a number of factors, not one of them lack of government spending. Lack of Federal spending has absolutely nothing to do with big business being in control - you, sir, need to do your research before you make arrogant, ignorant and rude claims.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
sorry Dixie, I feel an honor and pleasure that you responded. Truely sorry, but one of the issues so dear to me is what the goverment can do for people, because the business comunity will never provide a permanent and meaningful job for every body. what is your position on that?
jdgtitos 3 years ago
The government has no right to get involved in private business. It's not our job, as taxpayers, to pay the bills of people who don't work, or to make sure someone's job is meaningful. Communism has never worked in practice.
Our economy IS crumbling, but for a number of reasons - inflation and loss of the value of the dollar, the cost of the Iraq war, and yes - increased Federal spending. People can't find jobs because we're in a recession, and more spending won't help that.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
there are different areas of Federal spending, some might hurt and others lift the economy. I am about to get my bachelor degree in math this semester and I have study Macro-econmics and a lot of History, and what you are proposing is going back to the times when government 'was not involved' and there was so much misary and even children were workers. then came the Big Deppression, and the Democrats and Progressive ideas 'fixed' that mess through 'Federal' spending on needed people and.....
jdgtitos 3 years ago
Perhaps you might look into the real reasons why the great depression happened..ie the recall of margin loans with no notice to the general public resulting in massives numbers of banks foreclosing, and how about the inflation of the money supply by the federal
reserve and subsequent,purposeful deflation by the federal reserve.Both instances greatly contributed to the depression of the economy, and it was all directed by a few insiders who had foreknowledge of the event.Look into it...
Jalteck 3 years ago
Fancy words. Let me put it to you very simply so every body understands. THE MADAFUCKER CONSERVATIVE RICH HAD ALL THE MONEY AND NO MONEY WAS GOING AROUND FOR MANY.
jdgtitos 3 years ago
Wrong, fail.
I'm sorry, but your excessive profanity cannot be tolerated any longer. Please stop listening to anything Obama tells you, it'll do you good.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
I prefer Ron Paul than any other candidates.
But I canot agree with Ron Paul's economic ideology, which is outdated. He is a M.D. after all.
Maybe people (including myself) should study more about economics/politics before making any comments. DP, go read a bit more about gold standard.
arabidopsissb 3 years ago
The gold standard isn't really outdated, we've only been off it since the 70's and wince then, inflation has exploded. It's not just the gold standard - it's the Federal Reserve as well. Having a Central bank is one of the ten planks of Communism, and the Fed is destroying the economy.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
you wanna be my girlfriend bitch
jdgtitos 3 years ago
Maybe you should be Barack Obama's bitch :)
rebekahj 3 years ago
rebeka, in that your picture, you with glasses?
you look fine. One of these past days my friend called me a bitch. that's is a new trend, so I laughed when he called me that. Sorry about my words. I am 52, but I looked good and young.
Ron Paul? never heard of him. Just kidding, but he has a snow ball's chance in hell to become president. what you don't like about democrats?
jdgtitos 3 years ago
Please America for your own sake, vote Ron Paul into power! Obama will just do whatever the powers that be make him. Paul has shown that he is prepared to vote against the powers that be.
mocara 3 years ago
Exactly!
Thank you for commenting :)
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
You need to fix the audio on this or re-record with a better microphone. Your message is good but people need to hear it :)
electricneedleroom 3 years ago
Thanks :)
I know, my computer's audio is really weird, I'm trying to figure out how to fix it >.>
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
You don't support a full pullout of the middle east right. We do not want to leave ourselves vulnerable.
emperorburton 3 years ago
Yes, I do support immediate withdrawal. We just marched in, we can just march out. Our presense is inciting violence in the region, and I don't see how leaving would make us vulnerable - I think that continuing to stay in an endless war endangers us more than anything.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Little Mary Ann, make a special video # 30. I'd like watch it.
leonazul28 3 years ago
thanks for the vid, I've had to listen to people I know saying the same crap.
Slate1232 3 years ago
You're welcome :)
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
"Democracy is a form of government that cannot long survive, for as soon as the people learn that they have a voice in the fiscal policies of the government, they will move to vote for themselves all the money in the treasury, and bankrupt the nation."
Karl Marx
Socialism/communism is comming with either Obama or Clinton. Sorry to say this but I don't think we can get a Libertarian into office. I don't want to vote for McCain but given the choices he the best we got and it really sucks.
manwihthat 3 years ago
ever heard of a "write-in" vote? or a "third party". You don't have to vote for a Democrat or Republican.
racedoesnotexist 3 years ago
does anyone know how Obama voted against the war before he was in office?
racedoesnotexist 3 years ago
Thanks for that inspiring video. I'm a Ron Paul delegate to my state's Republican convention. Lot's of our resolutions passed at the local level. Keep up the fight. Freedom is worth it.
MektRanzz 3 years ago
You're welcome, thank you for getting involved and becoming a delegate! It's always inspiring to meet Patriots who are willing to help change the country :)
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
This is exactly right.
Parman08 3 years ago
Obama is the biggest neoconservative there is...and he's n ultra liberal!
racedoesnotexist 3 years ago
You're right, the Democrats and Republicans have become so much alike that it's ridiculous.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Dixie,
I think I love you, even though I'm old enough to be your grandpa... It's just wonderful to see young people like yourself actually thinking. You give us hope for the next generation.
Thank You!
wetalmorker 3 years ago
Thank you ^-^. It's great to meet people who are willing to stand up and fight for freedom :)
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Right on! I've been saying this for a long time!
pasatio 3 years ago
no offense, but its kinda hard to understand what u're saying...anyways the only reason why I support Barack Obama instead of Ron Paul is because Ron has no chance of winning.
But yes, it would be very nice if Ron Paul was in the office.
xMadNetx 3 years ago
I'm sorry if I was unclear; I have many reasons to support Ron Paul and NOT Obama, most of which I couldn't get into in five minutes.
No offense, but that's a horrible, dangerous reason to not support someone. That's HOW the media controls the elections - they repeat the mantra "he won't win!" and people vote on popularity. How many people said "Ron Paul won't win"? What if all those people had actually voted for him?
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Gee don't blame me, I'm not even old enough to vote xD
But come on, it's too late for Ron Paul to win, even if he wins the rest of the states.
So you must have a second option right?
xMadNetx 3 years ago
No second option not necessary.
utubehayter 3 years ago
Never put your name next to somebody you don't fully understand. You are wasting your vote when you vote for someone who doesn't support the constitution. Obama is a warmonger who wants war with Iran. How much does your vote really count? Do you think that voting for someone who is winning is going to make a difference? Like your one vote will change the world and the election? Give me a break. Vote for the person that's best, never waste your vote on the top tier propped up bs candidates!
shanklinmike 3 years ago
Well, I wasn't old enough to vote in the primaries...
Well, not necessarily, but by most accounts yes - he can't get the nomination. But I don't *have* to have a second choice. McCain, Obama and Clinton are all equally bad, and I won't vote against my conscience or for someone who has no respect for the Constitution.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
"anyways the only reason why I support Barack Obama instead of Ron Paul is because Ron has no chance of winning."
Thats just sad. You DO understand how democracy works right? THIS ISNT FOOTBALL, and if the person you vote for doesnt win, you dont "lose". You vote with your conscience, even if you are the only person to do so.
Do you understand how fundamentally flawed your mindset is? How that actually undermines the concept of democracy? Please wake up, we need your help.
redhankyspanky 3 years ago
Haha, you got a point xD
Even though I agree with you guys,but voting for Ron will not fully meet your satisfaction either. Admit it, Ron Paul can't win anymore....it's too late.
Now consider this, what would you rather have in the office? Obama or McCain. For me, I rather have Obama because McCain is much more of a war guy than Obama.
xMadNetx 3 years ago
Obama or McCain... How about neither? It's really not a chioce for me, because I think they'd be equally bad. Obama is just as much a globalist (he's said he wouldn't rule out going to war with Iran or Pakistan!) as McCain, he's just more eloquent and is against the unpopular Iraq war.
Obama's social policies are socialistic, too. That's not to say that I'd vote for McCain - he's quite liberal himself -but I'd definitely not prefer Obama.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Really?
Hmm, in my perspective, McCain is going to be like Bush #2...
xMadNetx 3 years ago
Yes, and I agree he will be the "McSame" as Bush. You misunderstand Bush - he's the antithesis of what true Conservatism is/was. An aggressive foreign policy, taking away of Civil Liberties, increased Federal power - those things aren't Conservative! Over the past 8 years, George W. Bush has destroyed what it means to be a Republican; he is definitely NOT Conservative, and neither is McCain.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
So would you rather have McCain or Obama?
xMadNetx 3 years ago
Neither...sorry, you're not going to get me to pick one or the other, Republicans and Democrats alike have tried and failed ;)
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
Well liberation theology or black liberation theology would explain his marxist views on government and these marxist were the ones who created liberation theology. The same theology Jeremiah Wright believes in and has give to Obama for the last 20 years. Just search up Liberation theology Obama and you will see what I mean. I don't think you would vote for a communsim or Socialism party.
manwihthat 3 years ago
Just listening to your education argument, only giving power to local officials will not help the education crisis. The problem is you have poor inner-city neighborhoods that cannot support schools because of a vast economic divide in this country. By doing what you suggest, you would just be ignoring a good portion of America.
fosterslover 3 years ago
Look at our current Federal education system (a redistribution of wealth sort of ideal) - there are still inner city underperforming school districts, in spite of all the Federal money they receive.
The District of Columbia's school district has received some of the highest Federal funding in the nation, yet it still is one of the lowest achieving. It's not just money that helps schools succeed, and it's wrong for the Government to dictate that some school districts pay for the others.
DixiePerkins 3 years ago
But there are thousands of schools that don't have the most basic materials that students would need to get a good education. This is not a debate about welfare where some people may be supporting a few slackers, but these are children who should get the same oppurtunity as everyone else.
fosterslover 3 years ago
The government will never be able to bring them this, only promises of it. Why is our country the richest in the world and why do we all have water and at least the basic necessities that other big government countries lack? It is because we didn't allow government oligopolies and monopolies. Because we didn't use big government to "fix" problems. Because we didn't centralize and federalize our power. The day the government becomes our parents is the day we lose our prosperity, or what's left.
shanklinmike 3 years ago
Keep preaching against the controllers that are wrecking our nation. The neo-conservatives and economic liberals suck and are destroying our constitution and our free society! Americans unite for prosperity and liberty!
shanklinmike 3 years ago
Obama is a politician. Ron Paul is a statesman. If you don't know the difference...find your high school Government teacher and smack them!
Ron Paul gives back! part of his Congressional pay to the treasury every year!
peltecs 3 years ago 5