Because the United Nations is basically the United States, the United States is controlled by Zionist fundementalists who are pro Israel, so if any Israeli war criminals would be tried the United States would veto it and get them out of the situation, the United States simply has the power to do so.
You're a paranoid moron. Nobody controls the UN. The UN has done nothing to prevent anything. Darfur. Rwanda. Nothing. If it was controlled by Zionists, how come the UN has not forced Lebanon to release the Israeli prisoners as part of the UN resolution? Nobody controls the UN, it's a paper tiger. Prat.
I might be paranoid, but you are a racist fucking zionist jew. Darfur and Rwanda have nothing to do with this. Why would the UN force Lebanon to release Israeli prisoners when their are 1000's of Lebanese and Palestinians in Israeli dungeons for decades? with Israel refusing to realease any of them.
Congrats. You ousted me. I am a racist fucking zionist Jew. You saw through my disguise. Now I've been ousted, I no longer intend to argue with someone with no capacity for either logic or grammar.
apywah - are you jealous of the man? I don't hear your voice or see your face over the podium begging for justice - begging for fairness - begging for the war in Iraq to end - NOW. When have you put your neck on the chopping block? When have you put your unguarded skin up on a dais somewhere & spoken in person in front of thousands, on the middle east dilemma?
maybe you're only a jealous little person, who can not know a true hero when he hears one
Well, I was invited onto a BBC World Service show with Mark Malloch-Brown, and criticised him on that. I have also been printed in The Times an The Metro dealing specifically with the Middle East.
I am not jealous of the man. I am not jealous of someone who puts himself infront of his constituents.
Who are you and what have you done with your life?
george is a politician who fights for what he believes unlike other politicians who just lie and play dirty politics for their own perosnal well being.
All these men are not friends in the traditional sense; not one would take a bullet for another without some sort of recompense. They are united by interest, and in this world it is both economics, as well as, an attempt to exceed economics.
Thanks George Galloway, those of us with independent minds have supreme respect for you. Isn't it sad that we have no respect whatsoever for our leaders. How do they get where they are? Why do we let them?
He was once on friendly terms with Tariq Aziz, but it is not true that he is friend of anyone in the Hussein family. I should be careful if I were you - Galloway is notoriously litigous, and internet anonymity affords no protection in the courts.
No different than Pres. Bush sr. Donald Rumsfeld and the other conspiring, conniving neo-con cabal, except Mr. Galloway never sold arms to Pres. Hussein.
Bush sr, was the first Pres. who publically coined the term 'New World Order' unofficial meaning: world domination by America. Traditional conservatives had no such aspirations, thus this makes him and everyone else who followed in his footsteps with agreement with him a 'neo-con' in translation a 'new conservative'.
I thought neo-cons is a term coined to describe a bunch of liberals in the 80's who maintained their political outlook to social policy, whilst changing their views on high taxation, to encompass the laissez-faire economic policies that helped American expansion in the late 70's. As Bush Jr has never been a liberal, he therefore cannot be a neocon
I'd like to remind you apiwah, that the debate started by your statement about G. G.'s 'friendship' with Pres. Hussein. I refuted your statement by pointing out the substantial help, such as military aid and intelligence sharing which Pres. Hussein received from his real erstwhile friends, during the 80's and very early 90's by Pres. Bush sr. and his neo-con lackeys. You came back by stating, that the G. H. W. B. and his lackeys were not neo-cons.
OK, will it satisfy your pedantic quest for precise definitions, if I use the generic term 'Empire builders' and accept the refutation of your ridiculous statement, or you will continue this tiresome and dishonest debating tactic, of the so called 'moving debate' where you sidestep the core issues presented?
I sidestepped it? I referred to one person's friendship with a dictatorial family, and rather than challenge that, you said 'so what, this other guy was too'. Bush's friendship with Husseins doesn't cancel out Galloway's...
That's only to be besmirching him. He had debate and disagreement with Pres. Hussein and condemned his various wars. You have a hidden agenda apywah, this 'issue' of yours, where you are only selectively sensitive about his 'friendship' while ignoring much more serious collusions, is only to blacken him, nothing more.
get your facts straight. your are spouting nonsense. Galloway vehemently opposed Saddam's regime at a time when Rumsfeld and the neocons were dealing with him to build oil pipelines and selling him weapons including poison gas. he was never friends with Saddam. he met with Saddam once to try and work out a way to end the sactions that were killed 1 million Iraqis, and another times to convince him to allow in weapons inspectors.
lol..ppl against george are against the truth and dont admit truth...GEORGE IS THE TRUTH!
xXantoniokXx 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
George, yr so full of shit! Terrorist apologist in love with yr own voice. fuck off back to big brother in yr fucking leotard you cocksucker!
jhertzberg 4 years ago
Are you a TRANSEXUAL?
french9987 3 years ago
i dont understand why the united nations dont impose sanctions on israel for war crimes and for having nucleur weapons.
hannibal9 5 years ago
the US will veto anything of that sort everytime it comes up, thats why it will never happen.
specialed05 5 years ago
Because the United Nations is basically the United States, the United States is controlled by Zionist fundementalists who are pro Israel, so if any Israeli war criminals would be tried the United States would veto it and get them out of the situation, the United States simply has the power to do so.
azara4life 4 years ago
You're a paranoid moron. Nobody controls the UN. The UN has done nothing to prevent anything. Darfur. Rwanda. Nothing. If it was controlled by Zionists, how come the UN has not forced Lebanon to release the Israeli prisoners as part of the UN resolution? Nobody controls the UN, it's a paper tiger. Prat.
apywah 4 years ago
I might be paranoid, but you are a racist fucking zionist jew. Darfur and Rwanda have nothing to do with this. Why would the UN force Lebanon to release Israeli prisoners when their are 1000's of Lebanese and Palestinians in Israeli dungeons for decades? with Israel refusing to realease any of them.
azara4life 4 years ago
Congrats. You ousted me. I am a racist fucking zionist Jew. You saw through my disguise. Now I've been ousted, I no longer intend to argue with someone with no capacity for either logic or grammar.
apywah 4 years ago
To be honest, i was going to press reply but i accidently pressed spam.
azara4life 4 years ago
George the Lion.
BIGSLOPK 5 years ago
George the Lion? More like George the man who'd sell his soul for more publicity
apywah 5 years ago
apywah - are you jealous of the man? I don't hear your voice or see your face over the podium begging for justice - begging for fairness - begging for the war in Iraq to end - NOW. When have you put your neck on the chopping block? When have you put your unguarded skin up on a dais somewhere & spoken in person in front of thousands, on the middle east dilemma?
maybe you're only a jealous little person, who can not know a true hero when he hears one
WNanette 5 years ago
Well, I was invited onto a BBC World Service show with Mark Malloch-Brown, and criticised him on that. I have also been printed in The Times an The Metro dealing specifically with the Middle East.
I am not jealous of the man. I am not jealous of someone who puts himself infront of his constituents.
Who are you and what have you done with your life?
apywah 5 years ago
george is a politician who fights for what he believes unlike other politicians who just lie and play dirty politics for their own perosnal well being.
hannibal9 5 years ago
apywah: George the Lion!!! Sharome the fatt PUSSY, is suffering like an animal!!!!
Gorgeous George!!!
No Justice No Peace!!!
azara4life 4 years ago 4
All these men are not friends in the traditional sense; not one would take a bullet for another without some sort of recompense. They are united by interest, and in this world it is both economics, as well as, an attempt to exceed economics.
rms2121 5 years ago
Thanks George Galloway, those of us with independent minds have supreme respect for you. Isn't it sad that we have no respect whatsoever for our leaders. How do they get where they are? Why do we let them?
jackpage 5 years ago
Bless you George Galloway... If only it could be.. that there were more like you.
hitchings000 5 years ago
GEORGE THE LION!!
shamraiz 5 years ago
George the friend of Saddam Hussein and family!
apywah 5 years ago
He was once on friendly terms with Tariq Aziz, but it is not true that he is friend of anyone in the Hussein family. I should be careful if I were you - Galloway is notoriously litigous, and internet anonymity affords no protection in the courts.
leninology 5 years ago
I feel fairly safe in declaring that he was on friendly terms with the Hussein family; but you are right, you gotta be careful what you say!
apywah 5 years ago
No different than Pres. Bush sr. Donald Rumsfeld and the other conspiring, conniving neo-con cabal, except Mr. Galloway never sold arms to Pres. Hussein.
wotan20 5 years ago
Bush is not a neocon - it is a term that is bandied around with being understood.
apywah 5 years ago
Bush sr, was the first Pres. who publically coined the term 'New World Order' unofficial meaning: world domination by America. Traditional conservatives had no such aspirations, thus this makes him and everyone else who followed in his footsteps with agreement with him a 'neo-con' in translation a 'new conservative'.
wotan20 5 years ago
I thought neo-cons is a term coined to describe a bunch of liberals in the 80's who maintained their political outlook to social policy, whilst changing their views on high taxation, to encompass the laissez-faire economic policies that helped American expansion in the late 70's. As Bush Jr has never been a liberal, he therefore cannot be a neocon
apywah 5 years ago
I'd like to remind you apiwah, that the debate started by your statement about G. G.'s 'friendship' with Pres. Hussein. I refuted your statement by pointing out the substantial help, such as military aid and intelligence sharing which Pres. Hussein received from his real erstwhile friends, during the 80's and very early 90's by Pres. Bush sr. and his neo-con lackeys. You came back by stating, that the G. H. W. B. and his lackeys were not neo-cons.
wotan20 5 years ago
OK, will it satisfy your pedantic quest for precise definitions, if I use the generic term 'Empire builders' and accept the refutation of your ridiculous statement, or you will continue this tiresome and dishonest debating tactic, of the so called 'moving debate' where you sidestep the core issues presented?
wotan20 5 years ago
I sidestepped it? I referred to one person's friendship with a dictatorial family, and rather than challenge that, you said 'so what, this other guy was too'. Bush's friendship with Husseins doesn't cancel out Galloway's...
apywah 5 years ago
That's only to be besmirching him. He had debate and disagreement with Pres. Hussein and condemned his various wars. You have a hidden agenda apywah, this 'issue' of yours, where you are only selectively sensitive about his 'friendship' while ignoring much more serious collusions, is only to blacken him, nothing more.
wotan20 5 years ago
LOL Turn off the tele and READ - anything!!!
WNanette 5 years ago
get your facts straight. your are spouting nonsense. Galloway vehemently opposed Saddam's regime at a time when Rumsfeld and the neocons were dealing with him to build oil pipelines and selling him weapons including poison gas. he was never friends with Saddam. he met with Saddam once to try and work out a way to end the sactions that were killed 1 million Iraqis, and another times to convince him to allow in weapons inspectors.
FlamingHound 5 years ago
Good on you George
razelma 5 years ago