Added: 2 years ago
From: videoScribble
Views: 12,340
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (145)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • amusing that mark morano compares emissions mitigation to neo-colonialism when the world bank (headed by an american and dominated by americans) has been telling developing nations how to manage their economies and political structures since the 1970s...

  • The American is right. I have been to Africa and Asia. The locals and villagers do not appreciate rich outsiders telling them not to cut down trees, chase off wildlife for farmland etc. Its just pure hypocrisy.

  • this morano is acunt! what a dick. maslin rules!!! he'll point at you!

    

  • this morano is acunt! what a dick. maslin rules!!! he'll point at you!

  • @samsetch Good ecofascist leftist. thepeoplescube com, zombietime com, PJTV com, lookingattheleft com, ringospictures com, dissectleft blogspot com, breitbart com, steynonline com, wattsupwiththat com, eco imperialism com, greenspirit com, greenhellblog com, climatedepot com, michellemalkin com, Tim Blair and Andrew Bolt blogs, colonelrobertneville blogspot com, horowitzfreedomcenter com, Watermelons the true face of the GREENS by James Delingpole. Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg.

  • @gmakepiece James Delingpole is a lying cunt. And well done on your 'sources'. You're arguing about a scientific consensus and the validity of climate science, yet I do not see one scientific paper or peer-reviewed science journal in there. Your 'sources' are all non-peer-reviewed blogs or media outlets - some of them personal blogs - and clearly written with an agenda; regardless of the validity of the agenda, 'greenhellblog', for example, if undoubtedly going to be biased, isn't it!

  • @biobotism Er, excellent logical fallacy ad hominem as your leading 'science based' argument. Science is NOTconsensus but a method 4 testing hypothesis, theory & data. Science is always provisional & demands ever new data & to be proven wrong. Science IS sceptical not gullible. NASA IPCCC scientists John R Christie, Richeard Lindzen, Charles Finkel, Roy Spencer R 'peer reviewed' etc. YOU DO NOT READ & never will. You have been passively mass indoctrinated by a dominant left ecofascist $ fraud

  • @gmakepiece failed to spot the logical fallacy, and not really an ad hominem attack, calling James Delingpole a lying cunt. What's more, it's rather hypocritical that you accuse me of misleading arguments or ad hominem after you tirade of comments labeling me an ecofascist and mass indoctrinated, lazy, spoiled child. I also fail to see where I said that science is based on consensus. I stated that there is a consensus, not that science is based on consensus.

  • @biobotism but this was merely to point out that the arguments that it is a conspiracy is a few individual scientists with an agenda is clear bullshit.

    Regardless, the rest of your comment is a verbose drawl of bullshit spouted by an arrogant, truculent, immature, self-obsessed, bigoted prick, who labels any climate change proponent a 'liberal, leftist' as if climate change science has some political agenda. It is clearly YOU who doesn't understand that basics of science.

  • @biobotism now if you want to debate science, and the science, then I am happy to do this, but YouTube is not a suitable medium for this. If you want to have your arse handed to you on a plate, please, give me an email address or blog site or something where substantial arguments can be written and responded to, unless you don't know enough to engage in a concise, structured debate.

  • @biobotism If you are in possession of important facts, why not post them? Unless you have nothing but phony unread parroting, post the names of your scientists, websites and other empirical sources that support your argument. Focus on at least five examples of evidence that prove your scientific claim that James Delingpole is a "lying cunt". You are a logical fallacy trained cognitive dissonant UNREAD lazy spoiled child of the mob rule left. Ecofascism is a perfect left liberal Marxist fit.

  • @gmakepiece I guess that's a no then - you're not willing to debate it properly. Well, go figure!

  • @biobotism YOUR "biased agenda" is that you are a left liberal teen twit. That's all you need. It's a group think mob rule thing. If you were not a projecting "lying cunt", you would behave decently & rational & thus not B a leftoid ecofascist emotional twerp. Likely U have not visited a single blog or read a single book or read a single paper or asked a single valid question, have you. Post your current reading list & favourite WEBSITES relevent to the absurdity of 'global warming'. U R UNREAD

  • @biobotism The alleged 'science' of the ecofascist left global warming spouting mob ALWAYS starts at a personal attack and then goes on from there, covering a surprisingly limited range of logical fallacy. It's all you have. "biased" is left code for "I cannot focus nor argue on facts and I do not read. How can I be wrong? I am your superior in all ways by default of my ideological posture." The left are narcissistic, moral vanity driven and relentlessly boring brats.

  • @biobotism Conservatives & libertarians too know everything about the dominant left as the left R virtually everywhere & where it's most easy & lucrative. The left gravitate toward government, media, celebrity, entertainment academia & other perfect places 4 variant elite radical socialist activism. We have 2 listen 2 the left 24 hours a day in every sphere but the truly productive. The left know ONLY themselves. It's all they listen to & all they allow to be heard. Left & book means unreadable

  • this brit is just rehashing the "white mans burden". I wonder if m-15 is looking to profit from this.

  • i hate these enviro mentalists,they only care about there enviroment.cheecky bastards telling third world countries what to do.

  • That was a fun debate in the video.

    "Here's your ass" Mark Maslin says Mark Morano.

  • The YES side got owned badly. What a blatant liar. 5000 scientists my arse.

    Ice caps and glaciers melting - what do you expect when coming out of an ice age? That nothing changes and we all live happy ever after? Bah - stupid fecker.

    The Earth's past is riddled with times when CO2 was some 10-20x higher and life clearly thrived, without a runaway greenhouse. 1000 years ago the Vikings colonised Greenland as the MWP was warmer than today. Their graves are since in permafrost. Dig that!

  • @MrOllyK

    Indeed, it is very wierd that we will be warming not on Co2 but Co2 positive feedback, while the lsat 0.6c increase was just Co2.

  • Finland..

    We've warmed about all we can on CO2, remembering that CO2 has a logarithmic effect and even quadrupling the amount now would only add about 0.5C.

    The Earth's past has seen 10-20x CO2 such as the Triassic and Jurassic where life clearly thrived without a runaway greenhouse. Notably, CO2 was low even during the Mediaeval Warm Period which was a few degrees warmer than now.

    CO2 lags temp by some 800-2000 years. The Sun's output has a better but still not perfect correlation.

  • @MrOllyK

    Wich would then place some of the vault into PDO (or MDO) or the Pacific Decadal Oscillation.

    Or perhaps all of them together, point being that there are so many other explanations and so many still hidden for mankind as we do not yet understand our climate perfectly.

  • That's right Finland.

    The beginning of the whole thing is the Sun, which then translates rapidly into the atmosphere which transports the heat, and to the land. The oceans take MUCH longer to warm and maintain that heat for much longer. Even after a rapid cooling of the Sun the oceans maintain that heat for some decades.

    There are so many variables, which is why governments are fraudulent in claiming CO2 as the only factor. CO2 content is like a grain of rice on a 4 seat dinner table.

  • Aie! Skeptic high five!

  • GW, what a freaking hoax. I wish I was still alive in a 150 years to see how the future laughs their ass off at us and the ridiculous "science" used by those who say we are destroying the planet. Blame it all on man, even the two ice ages and the moron who named Greenland.

    If the idiots weren't so dangerous, it would be laughable.

  • Leave it up to liberal democrats to find a way to tax the weather.

  • scientists lied - gw died.

    don't blame the public believers though, what else would you think if you were consistently lied to in your schools, movies, television ads etc.

    Blame the liars. And put them on trial.

    btw - I'm so sick of hearing it reported that they were 'hacked" emails. They weren't.

    They were released by a whistleblower.

  • @MrOllyK

    If MrOllyk truly has these links and the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee has confirmed it, there is no way that this comment is spam.

  • Finland..

    I did post it in a few places but the links and information are real, you might need to remove a few spaces from them first..

  • Global warming is (Michael) Mann-made.

  • u got shit 4 brains

  • @HOADYAS1 You have a limited vocabulary.

  • WILLLUVSTHE411 HERE ON YOUTUBE!!!

  • After we finally kill this Global Warming nonsense maybe we can start on multiculturalism and liberalism. Limp wristed political correctness has taken the western world from a world power to a worldwide joke.

  • the hacked e-mails tell whole story!! its all a fraud!! ClimateGate will be the end of all this. investigate for yourself!! I used to believe, but now i see the scam!!!!!

  • global warming is a hoax, mars is heating up too.

  • Listen man the pollar ice caps are melting they will be gone in 5 min or somthing like that or a day or 2 or whatever man your not cool because if you were like me you would know we have a problem people man people there not cool you know like bad bad for shit you know like the animals are like need what ever they say they need they know more than you you know think about hope that clears up globle warming for you just beleave it because be cool man.

  • wake up do some research yes planet is warming but not due 2 co2

  • The whole green fad is starting to unwind very fast now. Al Gore and the likes will be nothing but jokes in the history books of the future.

  • @IWashMyOwnBrain I think you knocked off a bit of the cerebral cortex when you 'washed your brain'.

    There was never a 'green fad'; rather, there was - and still IS - a scientific consensus that high carbon-emissions were and are still leading contributing to a common trend in increased global temperatures. It's not my opinion, it's not a minority group of scientists' opinions/ propaganda: it's a recorded scientific consensus based on evidence, overwhelmingly supported by peer reviewed papers.

  • @biobotism The only "scientific consensus" is that we don't know enough.

  • @IWashMyOwnBrain we do know a lot. An awful lot. Thousands of scientific studies, tens of thousands of pieces of evidence and statistical facts. Nothing is ever completely definitive in any field, but the probability that carbon gases are contributing to increased global temperatures is so statistically significant that it is completely nothing short of blindly closed-minded to deny what the scientific evidence clearly indicates.

  • @biobotism However, I extend my offer to you to debate this further via a different medium (i.e. not the debilitating 500 character YouTube comments section). Maybe by email or something of the sorts? You can even make a fake email address if you're paranoid.

    If you're right and I'm a 'blind believer' in some 'green fad' then you should be able to prove me wrong pretty easily. So what do you say, do you accept the challenge?

  • @biobotism "scientific evidence" has clearly indicated may things in the past and been wrong. I am not anti science but in this case there are too many variables for any scientist to come to a difinitive solution. Unless they have a social agenda....

  • @IWashMyOwnBrain Well, there are considerably more variables in, or example, the Theory of Evolution, but the Theory of Evolution is fact, don't you agree? And there's considerably more uncertainty in, for example, Quantum Mechanics, but that doesn't stop us making quantum computers that utilise our understand of the Quantum world; but, you know, it's nice to know that you can pick and chose what science to be irrationally sceptical of...

  • @biobotism I do "believe" in evolution. A theory is not fact.

  • @IWashMyOwnBrain and here we go at last; conclusive evidence that you do not know the first rat's arse about science. A theory in science terminology is different from a theory in the colloquial sense, and a scientific theory CAN be and IS a fact. Correctly defined as a scientific model that it taken, for all practical purposes, as being true. A theory is a proven hypothesis, but it cannot become a law. Despite popular misconception, there is no hierarchy between a hypothesis, theory or law.

  • @biobotism [continued] many people assume that as more proof is offered, a hypothesis becomes a theory and finally a law when it is finally considered a fact, but this is just not true. A law is a mathematical or concise verbal statement and is completely independent from a theory. A theory can include facts, laws and hypothesis in order to support the proposed scientific model, which is why, for example, evolution is considered a scientific fact as well as a scientific theory.

  • @biobotism [continued 2] and as such, a law can be utilised to support a theory and offer conclusive evidence. I suggest that you read up further on the processes by which science works. I'd recommend that you starting by researching what science is defined as (it's a discipline that follows a scientific method) and also research what the scientific method is. In addition, have a quick study of basic scientific terminology and then come back and tell me again what you've just told me. Thanks :)

  • I'm not a denier of climategate nor have i seen al gores movie.

    I'm more interested in making people remember how fixed the oil prices are and how we are going to get screwed over everytime a "bin laden" tape comes out and the oil price goes up $10 a barrel.

    soon if a oil boss wets himself in public the oil price will go up! fuck buying oil from terrorists nations! terror free oil

  • The numbers don't add up. And if you are looking at Science statistics. Let us take a look at some science that isn't based on a bias where we wont have "skewed data".

    I have one big scientific fact, it has been in the soar system for millions of years. It emits enough radiation to kill several billion small sheep, and its magnetic polarity is the center point of our small point in the milky-way galaxy.

    We are NOT the center of the universe!! Science has proved that.

  • Morano mopped the floor with Maslin's ignorant head. How embarrassing to be such a bloviating ignoramous Maslin. Try getting one or two facts right next time instead of throwing out a bunch of easily discreditable poo.

  • we need prosecutions, and al gore needs to give back his "peace[piece] prize"

  • It is so easy to make commitments to something that doesn't take affect until you are out of office.

  • The problem with proponents of AGW, is that they are mindless sheep. They will believe anything that the UN and al gore tells them because its in line with their lefty ideology. This is one of the biggest frauds in the history of the world. And the saddest thing of all is that the IPCC's computer models can continue to be wrong and the mindless sheep that I mentioned above will never ask why. They will never challenge AGW, because to them its like a religion, the science doesn't matter anymore.

  • b good if more people hade a clue like yourself an open there eyes

  • man made climate change is a fraud theres proof its a communist like takeover. Forecasting utopia a ending in slavery

  • 31.000 say it is rubbish!!!

  • Maslin is a punk and a fool. He can't argue his case so he descends to personal snide remarks. Morano walked all over him. "Global warming" is a complete fraud.

  • So you're not intelligent if you disagree with you? That's fucking insane! His accent is so irritating. Jesus.

  • Climategate, climategate, flimsy denials. First it was global cooling, then the rain forest, then the ozone layer. Now some big government fools have figured out how tax a harmless trace gas in our atmosphere. You're not fooling me.

  • the arab oil men have still got you though. They win big out of this.

    the men who earns billions on oil are jumping for joy over those 2 emails that hoodwinked the entire west.

    if its a hoax or not, those oil men are very happy right now. They will order a few more diamond encrusted cars

  • Doesn't matter they sound like assholes in those emails.

  • Good grief. It would've taken you literally 10 seconds to see who I was replying to. I guess proper context is too much to ask for from some people.

  • I especially like how this "professor" interrupts multiple times, then even gets a little personal by citing supposed "spin." That isn't something that negates what the other guy is saying, just claiming "spin" and such. You actually have to make an argument against it, and if its "spin," its an easy win, right? Not so easy to address if that "spin" is a valid point.

    And the "I've been arguing this for 20 years" bit... personally invested, much? He doesn't *want* to be wrong.

  • Let's face it,anything bad that happens to this planet is well deserved.

  • Correction: Anything bad that happens to Mankind,is well deserved :)

  • "Global Warming" is a fallacy.Doesn't the world have more important thinks to worry about than a 1 degree temperature increase 50 years from now?

  • 52 scientists multiply into 5000 scientists when they need to make a pro-global warming point. I wonder if they use the same maths on their temperature data?

  • "Could you starve to death a little bit more? Would you mind getting a little more malaria? A few more flies collecting on you? Hm?"

  • How do you control the 3rd world? Control their resources. I am pretty sure we have seen this before in history. The IPCC will be responsible for the extermination of billions. They want to get rid of about 85% of us.

  • Well, what did you think?

    Beats sitting around watching television

  • i just realized, if the IPCC said that global warming was not real, they wouldn't have jobs anymore....

  • Hoax people, your morons. innovation is always stronger than fear. If you don't believe? research. the Conservatives debate is weak. Their debating against science, data. Good luck, republicans. Theres more independant thought than your dictoral expression. People aren't scared, their innovating. All the conservatives do is whine, cry, and fear. there's a difference between a man talking and a man doing. So far the conservative group is riding the coat tail of what men are doing.

  • If you actually think that all Democrats are FOR the Copenhagen Summit then you don't know all the Democrats. And on that note actually believing that this is a Democrat/Republican issue to begin with shows a very narrow view of what is really going on and feeds those that love the great divide. You extremes on the left and extremes on the right are drinking from the same Koolaid pitcher and you don't even know it.

  • I agree.

  • That said, because I believe in free thought and speech from everyone, continue to believe as you wish and I will do the same.

  • Science is not a set of beliefs or a system of beliefs. The data shows that carbon does not have an effect on the temperature level. They've covered up medieval warming and exaggerated todays warming! People are totally distorting facts, Mt Kilimanjaros is losing ice because its drier and colder, not because of warming!

  • Wisdom.

  • Well science is never separate from culture or ideologies...

  • You are a waste of time. You know what they say?

    Don't try to teach a pig to sing...it's a waste of time and it annoys the pig.

  • Biggest Hoax EVER. There really are a lot of Stupid people in this world that don't understand that these "Scientists" don't recieve research finding for things that don't exist.

  • what about the record highs and lows weve been seeing? liberal conspiracy?

  • A lack of data, actually. We've only been recording specific information for about 50 years now, a blippit. 50 years is nothing. We have vaguely reliable data for about 200 years, and thats still nothing in terms of climate patterns. "Record" highs and "record" lows may not be something we have in record, but we KNOW they've happened before. We *know* medieval times were warmer, we *know* there have been warmer & colder times, yet it's ignored for those steeped in the disease of self-blame.

  • Yesss!!!

  • Global HOAX

  • I guess they feel emboldened after they got the bail out lie through without a hitch. Do I need to pay $5 in climate tax every time I take a dump so that the umpa lumpas of some fictitous island have to walk on stilts at high tide?

    Cambridge boy on the left says yes.

  • professor got schooled...

  • I really feel for the pro-climate change people, theyre really think they're defending the planet but in reality they're dooming the human kind.

  • Grit your teeth professor, your lies are crumbling

  • they go in africa take oil,diamant.gold, and give money to same people in power so they can buy homes abroad and build palace.

  • Maslin said he's been having this debate for 20 years... He was in college for 4 of those 20 years (Cambridge, 1989-1993). So has been on board with the AGW hysteria since he started college? No wonder he can't bring himself to see the truth now - that would mean his entire worldview would collapse.

    He is no scientist.

  • politicians want o be voted in... therefore they go with popular thought. but i think that is changing a lot as we learn more. they already arranged coppenhagen but i think by the time it happened it is a waste of time. no one is interested anymore. it's bullshit. and a huge number of people already thought that before climategate.

    politicians, listen to like here in australia, no one wants emissions trading schemes in the real world. it is all bull for someone to get rich again.

  • We cant even tell what the weather tommorrow is going to be like. To think we now have the knowledge to state the globe is warming due to man-made CO2 just shows how ignorant these people think we are.

  • Hilarious debate. "5000 scientists - you said 4000 yesterday! Why not 100000? Ships coming through the NE Passage FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY - what a load of rot! The learned professor should at last check his facts

  • oh dear 5000 scientist ..a bull face lie .

    mark maslin your spouting junk science and now we are checking your statements and claims for ourselves .you are busted dude its over .find another job if you can

  • 1:04 to 1:16 sums it up good.

  • Very easy to see when liar Maslin is put up against a man of integrity. It's hard for some one who has no separation of right from wrong to know whereto draw the line.

    IPCC has been shown to fabricate their data and are not needed in the worldwide pursuits of real science. Then Mark Maslin tried to give another huge Fib about 5000 scientists. These people are just plain desperate to make their phony case and hope it can be bought and believed by the weak. minded.

  • I complete disagree with Mark Maslin that the 3rdW that needs to cut their emissions. The 1stW has polluted their way to prosperity and has had the leading edge over the 3rdW for over 50 years. The 1stW do not want them to improve. How else will the 1stW enjoy cheap products and 3rdW resources? The 3rdW should be left alone and the 1stW should reduce their wasteful lifestyles and reduce their ecological footprint (not carbon) and LEAD an example for the 3rdW, not dictating them.

  • The IPCC has only 2,500 experts on global warming. Less than 1% are Climatologists. Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC is not a Climatologist, but an engineer. Al Gore is not a Climatologist. 31,486 scientists, including 9,029 with PhDs, plus 650 of the worlds top Climatologists are all against global warming. 32,136 = against global warming to 2,500 = for global warming. There is no consensus among scientists concerning this issue. "Man caused" Global warming does not exist. It is a myth!

  • Absolutely, and now with climate-gate exposing the truth, they still deny.

  • @demonpreyer, the reason I believe that is because the Earth has been warming and cooling for millions of years and we weren't even here yet. I'm not buying the global warming.

  • It's refreshing to come across someone with good ole "common sense." Good point!

  • I hate to admit it, but the UK has better journalists and news programs than America. Climategate (and the silence from our American media) made that embarrassingly clear :(.

  • No, not really - the BBC in the UK is terribly biased. They tried to cover-up and bury the climategate story for weeks - only finally reporting it once it became big in the states.

    Sky news (also owned by Murdoch like Fox) is more neutral - some good discussions like this one, but alot of balony from journalists spouting alarmist propaganda from the amazon etc.

  • The Professor gets OWNED in the end!!

  • Maslin - You Lie. You're on the left in more ways than one. Thanks again to Marc for speaking up for the truth and for common sense. The message is slowly getting through. The eco-loonies in the US and UK will be voted out once people realise the whole MMGW religion is a pure scam based on lies and scare stories disguised as science.

  • It's funny to see a "scientist" fight for his paycheck.. lol

    Peace

  • Maslin has got to love that UK Government Dentist eh? Typical British Tooth Decay, and it looks like it went to his brain.

  • Marc it may mean giving up pizza, thick cunt, stay in the city and die young...........

  • Jct: Another one bites the dust. What a drubbing Marc Marano put on Prof. Mark Mattson who could only keep repeating the talking points that have already been disproven (of course, not to the booboisie who get their their news without digging for it on their own). Another scientist's reputation bites the dust.

  • What I loved best was that at the very times I felt like laughing at the Professor of Error, I could see Marano's eyes laughing at him too! See the glint of victory when Mattson upped his scientist list from 4,000 to 5,000.

    What a rush watching these Kamikazes going down in flames to keep the spoon-fed-news mobs wondering who is right? Was a "trick to hide the decline" just really a "neat way to hide the decline?" Har har.

  • Maslin is an idiot, still wet behind the ears.

    He's the result of a marxist education. Lies and more lies and when they don't work, lie even bigger. 20% of the population will be lost if we don't start giving money to poor countries.

    Greenie asshole are nothing more than Commie assholes of years gone by.

  • Elmer Fudd is the real denier. Climate Gate exposed the clear lies. Maslin might as well be defending 'Flat Earth'. GW is a fraud designed to steal taxpayers money.

  • It's all a panic driven pack of misconceptions. This is a natural occurrance and we can do nothing to change it.But we can do something to stop pollution for a healthier atmosphere in which we live.. Move away from the coastal areas.And yes use as much alternative energy as possible But WITHOUT KILLING OUR ECONOMY. It's struggling enough already!

  • Its difficult to sell the item when you know the target (mass public) is well aware they will be cheated. As any succesful sales pitch takes command by the nature of its self-assurance and delivery, it's difficult for even the best representatives to sell to people air. The self-deception is clearly showing on this guys face. Which means he has a conscious. The selected Jeffry Dahmer types we see in places of power and politic won't risk revealing who they are, and let others take the grunt.

  • climate change is dead .this is one religion jesus wont be saving .lord monckton is a hero check out this vid ..........you tube... "Lord Monckton Invades SustainUS Booth - Calls U.S. students "Hitler Youth"

  • Copenhagen = White colonialism over brown/black people. Spot on.

  • Nah, Morano is just using that line to tweak the noses of liberals. It's like arguing against affirmative action on the grounds that it's bad for black people.

  • They'll screw the developed countries' taxpayers to get huge sums of money to lend, not give, to the third world countries which will screw them as well, just like what IMF and World Bank did to many third world countries, right?

  • The burden of proof is on the people who want the rest of us to sacrifice our standard of living in order to reverse something that has not yet happened.

  • Thanks Marc, it seems that no amount of evidence matters to the AWG world of nuts. They refuse to look at any possibility they are Wrong. Besides their data being compromised, there is this whole thing about WHY the weather changes and they have never proved that man had anything to do with these changes.

    The UN is a criminal organization and we should get out NOW!

    Impeach Obama if he signs any agreement.

    The US is a sovereign nation.

    Say NO to One World Government.

  • The AWG crowd is officially the latest religion where blind faith trumps reality.

  • Morano is a bit of a wiseguy. His lack of deference and constant grinning and smirking doesn't sit well with English academic types.

  • English academic types are the exact putzes that have got all this wrong, and are heading us down the WRONG path. The scientist in this video LIED about the number of scientists who agree. He knows that he lied. He refuses to mention the RECORD level of antarctic sea ice we now have. Another "inconvenient truth" the scientist wants to sweep under the rug. He is PISSED that his life's work is unraveling...the lies and corruption exposed. His gravy train of unending research grants is gone.

  • English academic types can smoke a pole.

  • I think this is partially true. Morano is very confident in his position and if you spend any time on his website, you'll notice he has a very irreverent sense of humor... Part of the irritation of these acedemic types is Morano is very effective in exposing them...

  • Jct: There wasn't the chance to rebut the stream of errors so laughing at your opponent when you expect the audience to be laughing at him to does get the message home without needing to interrupt.

  • This whole argument about CO2, with a bit of luck, will be over soon as the CERN Cloud experiment finally shows how climate is caused. We shall move from molecules of carbon to muons of radiation. And about those we can do nothing. Trillions of dollars saved by common sense.

  • They'll hide the muons.

  • Morons don't do muons.

  • Maslin about temperatures is like Madoff about bank accounts. Both are telling "never seen as high" and both forget to say values are declining over the past years. Madoff is in jail, who's next.

  • Go Marc get into these idiots who claim to be the gatekeepers of science.

    We know different and the rest of the world is catching up.

    We need these fools sprouting their rubbish, it makes the skeptics argument all the more likely.

    People are starting to see through the alarmist propaganda, the more they try to scare us the more sensible people start looking for the truth.

    Encourage them I say, it makes them look foolish.

  • Maslin is a talking pile of shit.

  • Maslin is a certainly a pile.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more