i don't understand everything in this talk, but he doesn't convey that he understands properly why classical vaccine approaches don't work. too many assumptions. the alternatives he proposes are clearly non-starters.
"It began in 2009 with Eneydi Torres....Several months later, Magdalena Mays was arrested on similar charges. But like the Torres case, prosecutors dropped their HIV-related complaint against her"
@transtlantic "..., because Serrano developed illnesses commonly defined as “AIDS-related conditions”....only AFTER.... taking HIV medications known as “highly active antiretroviral therapy” (HAART), the drugs themselves appear to have caused “AIDS.”
Just read the article. You said you did. Why lie about it? Googe...Verdict Of $2.5 Million Over False-Positive HIV Diagnosis Brings up Basic Problems With AIDS Testing and Treatment, Say Scientists
@DishrackDarwin I'm done for the night sweetie. Take screenshots. Take many many screenshotsand put a link to this video so people can see. You needto see trans the "genius" in action to believe it.
@transtlantic Google....More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges
"“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”
A fatal flaw with HIV tests leaves prosecutors with no credible witnesses from local, state or federal health agencies ..."
so i am not educated for understanding ALL medical textbooks on pathology related to AIDS and HIV, for understanding the position of ALL medical associations, and science associations?
poor me...
you never wonder why only morons like you believe in so many crap?
dates of studies are very relevant. you claiming at 1993 that no studies exist and then in 1995 a study proves you wrong. it's obvious that you can't use the 93 claim anymore.
"In another defeat for AIDS propagandists, Louisiana prosecutors have dropped all HIV-related criminal charges against a Louisiana woman. According to attorney Jake Lemmon, Jefferson Parish prosecutors dropped all HIV-related charges against Magdalena Mays, despite a test that identified her as HIV+ in 2008.
researched? your christian moronic uneducated pal just provided a link to one of his latest articles where he uses as a evidence for denial a paper from 1983.
LOLOL.. how is that "research for his books"? LOLOL
@transtlantic Um....I'm an atheist. We've already been over that. There were no "denial" papers in 1983 you "genius". Gallo didn't call his press conference until 1984.
@DishrackDarwin Well yeah.The hard part isn't finding where trans lies it's which lying idiocy to choose from. You def need to make a transidiot vdeo with screenshots.
@transtlantic Um...no you slapping up random studies isn't proof of anything. YOU have no technical credentials or relevant trainng of any kind. I go to experts with identities and credentials that are easily verified. Even I know finding RT in a sample is not a direct isolation of a microbe from fresh plasma.
@transtlantic No honey finding scrapsof genetic material allegedly from Gallo's virus isn't the same thing as finding an actual whole infectious virus particle you "genius"
@transtlantic Lmao...honey fragments f genetic material are NOT the same thing as a whole infectious virus particle. It just isn't. That's like finding a person's dna somewhere and thinking you can sit down with it for a chat. You just can't.
@transtlantic Lmao...WOW you don't even know the correct terminology. A virus "particle" means a whole virus.
You can't sit down with someone's dna for a cup of coffee because there is a big difference btw finding fragment of genetic material and finding a whole person. That's why they don't put genetic samples in prison.
@transtlantic Um....no. That is not what I said. You fucked up th terminolgy because you are a "genius" who lives in his Mom's basement while pretending to be a medical student with no classes on youtube.
@transtlantic You fucked up the terminology. Lol....you also can't read. You are NEVER in class. You're always on youtube PRETENDING to be a medical student. Students are usually in class or studying
@transtlantic YES Dr de Harven IS an expert. Google..Etienne De Harven.
Etienne de Harven M.D. is Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.
@transtlantic Lmao....HEY I go to experts with identities and credentials I can easily verify. That paper does NOT describe a DIRECT isolation. It's just some frankencrap they created in a petri dish.
nope. you go to people who is retired for more than 2 decades, people who have no credentials in biology and you didn't prove his emeritus title. because in fact... he doesn't have one.
the papers i am posting present direct isolation of HIV.
"Viral RNA, extracted from these samples was used"
@transtlantic Lmao...Dr Harven and Dr Sanger DO have credentials in biology. We already went over that. Are you going to try claiming Dr De Harven isn't qualified AGAIN?!?!?
WOW! You really are one of the biggest"geniuses" I have ever met.
when the new genetic vaccines or GM cell vaccines start to kick in i am sure you will cry and shout your aids denialism at your strongest level! lolol
@transtlantic "Up to today there is actually no single scientifically really convincing evidence for the existence of HIV. Not even once such a retrovirus has been isolated and purified by the methods of classical virology."
Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sanger, Emeritus Professor of Molecular Biology and Virology, Max-Planck-Institutes for Biochemistry, Munchen.
@DishrackDarwin Lmao...oh yeah that's right trans the "genius" told us Dr De Harven has no credentials and doesn't work. It sounds like psychological projection to me.
"We used Env-defective HIV-1 viruses for most of the studies to eliminate the possible formation of an apparently internal compartment resulting from fusion of two previously separate cells. The electron tomographic analyses with fixed, embedded cells were carried out with infectious HIV-1 BaL. Three days post-infection, the infected macrophages were harvested"
@DishrackDarwin He's not an "aids" expert per se. He is an expert on electron micrographs with an emphasis on retroviruses. He had a recent article in JPANDS
Are HERVs an Answer to AIDS Mysteries?
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons - Published: 2010-09-04
Why is it so hard to isolate and purify "hiv"? Why has no one been able to see, by electron microscopy, a single HIV particle in the blood of AIDS patients, even those who have a "high viral load"?
@transtlantic yes he is. Google....Ettienne De Harven
Etienne de Harven M.D. is Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.
Etienne de Harven M.D. is Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.
"The ratios of HIV-1 p24CA to HLA DR and beta 2-M were found to vary with respect to the HIV-1 isolate, host cell, and other factors. Electron microscopic analysis of microvesicles revealed that they consisted of particles of various sizes and morphologies. Although HIV-1 particles are known to contain some cellular proteins, microvesicles from HIV-1 infected H9 cells appeared to contain little or no HIV-1 gp120SU."
"so many false positives"? nope. less than 1 per 1000, you dumb retard. and a positive test results in a second test, decreasing the % of false positive diagnosis, you moron.
being specific for HIV antibodies means the tests are specific in detecting infection by HIV. as ONLY HIV will cause the production of those antibiodies. false positives result from cross reactions. which happen in less than 0,01% of the cases.
actually... ALL the manufacters of the test kits claim that their kits detect infection by HIV by an X sensibility and X specificity. just read any of their associated labels.
not all tests are for antibodies.
"only for screening blood", no shit. HIV spread in the body mainly by hematogenic pathways, you idiot.
Google....Verdict Of $2.5 Million Over False-Positive HIV Diagnosis Brings up Basic Problems With AIDS Testing and Treatment, Say Scientists
"Rodney Richards, Ph.D., worked on the development of antibody (ELISA) and genetic “viral load” tests for Amgen and holds some related patents. “The diagnosis of being HIV positive is based on arbitrary combinations of tests, none of which are approved for diagnosing HIV,” he says. “In fact there is no test for HIV. It’s just an illusion.”
“We did not purify [isolate] ... We saw some particles but they did not have the morphology [shape] typical of retroviruses ... They were very different ... What we did not have, as I have always recognized it, is that it was truly the cause of AIDS.”
Interview with Djamel Tahi-1997
— Dr. Luc Montagnier, Virologist, co-discoverer of HIV, Pasteur Institute, Paris
@transtlantic I already have. You are either an idiot or a liar. I don't care which. If YOU have the evidence the prosecuting DA's need to prosecute people then offer your expert services tothem.
you have? not at all. you provided a news article of some sort from a known aids denialist website that presents NO direct link that would support any of their assertions.
ALL trials have a public record. where is it?
the DAs already prosecute with success thousands of people who do not declare that they are HIV +.
@trans What does that site have to do with anything? Google....« More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges
"“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”
A fatal flaw with HIV tests leaves prosecutors with no credible witnesses from local, state or federal health agencies .."
OMSJ director has no qualifications in any given field of science. the SOLE news is on his website without ANY sort of link to the trial case. for all i know: he is lying. which is not unheard of from people who want to explore ignorant HIV positive people.
there is NO fatal flaw.
you are full of shit.
where is the direct link to ANY of the cases that you mentioned?
@transtlantic DUH! You already said that and I already pointed out that he;s commenting on law and legal cases. Direct links ARE included. I don't know if you're a liar or an idiot and I don't care.
"It began in 2009 with Eneydi Torres.....Several months later, Magdalena Mays was arrested on similar charges. But like the Torres case, prosecutors dropped their HIV-related complaint against her."
Google.....More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges
"“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”
A fatal flaw with HIV tests leaves prosecutors with no credible witnesses from local, state or federal health agencies ...."
i don't understand everything in this talk, but he doesn't convey that he understands properly why classical vaccine approaches don't work. too many assumptions. the alternatives he proposes are clearly non-starters.
anthssimpson 11 months ago
Google....Court Trials Unnerve HIV Propagandists
"It began in 2009 with Eneydi Torres....Several months later, Magdalena Mays was arrested on similar charges. But like the Torres case, prosecutors dropped their HIV-related complaint against her"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@more cases where the case is related to malpractice and it was a HIV test used to prove there was no HIV infection...
you are a nutjob
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic "..., because Serrano developed illnesses commonly defined as “AIDS-related conditions”....only AFTER.... taking HIV medications known as “highly active antiretroviral therapy” (HAART), the drugs themselves appear to have caused “AIDS.”
Just read the article. You said you did. Why lie about it? Googe...Verdict Of $2.5 Million Over False-Positive HIV Diagnosis Brings up Basic Problems With AIDS Testing and Treatment, Say Scientists
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
the article? i am reading the piece at MSNBC website and at Philadelphia Injury Lawyer blog.
there is no reference to the HAART therapy causing AIDS, or AIDS related illness.
the doctor assumed the side effects were AIDS related illness.
but he was in fact sued for MAL practice for a reason.
retard.
"say scientists"? when are you going to post: "prove scientists"? HA HA HA
transtlantic 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@transtlantic
Why are you lecturing about subjects you don't understand fake doctor?
You spend all your time on YT making a fool of yourself and provding comedy gold with your retarded comments.
Why are you unable to tell us which theory of evolution you believe explains plant speciation?
You keep preaching about a theory of evolution and you don't even know what theory you believe in, You said " flies are a species of dog"
hahahahahahahahahahaha
WildCatsKitten1 2 months ago
@DishrackDarwin I'm done for the night sweetie. Take screenshots. Take many many screenshotsand put a link to this video so people can see. You needto see trans the "genius" in action to believe it.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
you are just been debunked again. loser.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
i don't waste a lot of time here. i am in fact the one who spends less time here.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin He is SUCH a "genius". I hope you're taking screenshots
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
how am i retarded for KNOWING that biblical floods didn't happen, evolution is a fact and AIDS is caused by HIV?
what medical association, science association, university or science textbook disagrees with me?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Google....More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges
"“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”
A fatal flaw with HIV tests leaves prosecutors with no credible witnesses from local, state or federal health agencies ..."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
clark baker: unqualified journalist.
not one single link to any of the court cases he claims that existed
"fatal flaw" - link to a Bauers article (the man who believes in the loch ness monster".
anedoctal crap.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao...um...Clark Baker isn't a journalist.
There ARE links you're just too much of a "genius" to find them.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
if there are links why can't you post one here?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
you must think educated people have the time you have to waste on yt... LOLOL
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Um...NO I don't that's how I know YOU aren't educated. Lmao DUH!
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
so i am not educated for understanding ALL medical textbooks on pathology related to AIDS and HIV, for understanding the position of ALL medical associations, and science associations?
poor me...
you never wonder why only morons like you believe in so many crap?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
yeah... because only one person knows that the biblical flood never happened, evolution is a fact, aids is caused by hiv and spirits don't exist...
i am so alone on this...
HA HA HA HA
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
when specifically did i "lose"?
you the one who believes in god, am i lying?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
you said: "God did it".
that's what the bible says, right?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
you the one saying that Hitler wasn't a "true christian". dumbass.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
you the one who believes in a literal account of the bible, remember?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
dates of studies are very relevant. you claiming at 1993 that no studies exist and then in 1995 a study proves you wrong. it's obvious that you can't use the 93 claim anymore.
AIDS exist for more than 50 years, moron
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin he always does that. He doesn't actually read anything. He dosn't actually understand the terminology he just looks at dates
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
i understand far more than you. that's why i KNOW that HIV tests are perfectly fine and accurate.
you ignore that the SAME type of tests are used to determine: HBV, HHV and hundreds more types of viral infections.
loser.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic No. Proscutors are gettingtheir cases thrown out because they CAN'T prove anyone has ever been infected with Gallo's virus.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
where? you keep not showing any trial case ID. you are full of shit.
i see no DA puting their cases aside, not one.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Goole....More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges
"In another defeat for AIDS propagandists, Louisiana prosecutors have dropped all HIV-related criminal charges against a Louisiana woman. According to attorney Jake Lemmon, Jefferson Parish prosecutors dropped all HIV-related charges against Magdalena Mays, despite a test that identified her as HIV+ in 2008.
Mays faced up to ten years of hard labor."
clck on the links "genius"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
no direct link to anywhere. you keep showing bullshit.
where is the trial case link to magdalena mays? i see no referent to it?
you are full of shit.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao..ok "genius"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
remember: tomorrow is another day and no medical doctor gives a fuck about your aids denialism.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Google....
Aids: are we being deceived?
By Christian Fiala, MD, PhD He is a researcher of AIDS in Uganda and Thailand.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
lol..another name of an idiot without any support for any of his claims.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
actually...facts can become outdated.
it's part of science to disprove certain previous claimed "facts".
you would know this if you had any clue on how science works.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
researched? your christian moronic uneducated pal just provided a link to one of his latest articles where he uses as a evidence for denial a paper from 1983.
LOLOL.. how is that "research for his books"? LOLOL
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Um....I'm an atheist. We've already been over that. There were no "denial" papers in 1983 you "genius". Gallo didn't call his press conference until 1984.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
you are not an atheist. you believe in bullshit theist crap.
harven used a 1983 paper, ask him why.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
1995 has nothing to do with 1993. it means ALL the papers i am presenting prove him wrong.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
when a person retires and doesn't keep paying atention to new knowledge it's obious that their training might become outdated.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
1995 is AFTER 1993. moron.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
what study was from around his retirement? he retired in July 1st, 1993
all studies are from after that date, the ones i presented.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin Well yeah.The hard part isn't finding where trans lies it's which lying idiocy to choose from. You def need to make a transidiot vdeo with screenshots.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
Leukemia. 1997 Apr;11 Suppl 3:138-41.
Molecular analyses of HIV-1 group O and HIV-2 variants from Africa.
see... you are wrong again.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Um...no you slapping up random studies isn't proof of anything. YOU have no technical credentials or relevant trainng of any kind. I go to experts with identities and credentials that are easily verified. Even I know finding RT in a sample is not a direct isolation of a microbe from fresh plasma.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
AIDS. 1995 Jul;9(7):685-90.
A genetic analysis of HIV-1 from Punjab, India reveals the presence of multiple variants.
"random studdies"? all them show isolation of HIV from HIV+ people.
i do have technical credentials: med school.
relevant training? med school, residency program ongoing.
you still haven't shown the evidence for the emeritus. where is it?
finding "RT"? lol...what?
finding HIV RNA from fresh plasma is a direct isolation.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic No honey finding scrapsof genetic material allegedly from Gallo's virus isn't the same thing as finding an actual whole infectious virus particle you "genius"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
"scraps of genetic material"? that happen to be precisely HIV RNA. go figure!
"actual whole infectious virus"? go to my profile first paper there.
FULL pictures of HIV.
you are on denial rant again.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao...honey fragments f genetic material are NOT the same thing as a whole infectious virus particle. It just isn't. That's like finding a person's dna somewhere and thinking you can sit down with it for a chat. You just can't.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
i just told you i have a paper on my profile with WHOLE infectious virus. "particle" is one thing. a virus is made out of many particles.
a person's DNA in a crime scene can tell a lot. right?
i can even tell if it's male, female, etc.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao...WOW you don't even know the correct terminology. A virus "particle" means a whole virus.
You can't sit down with someone's dna for a cup of coffee because there is a big difference btw finding fragment of genetic material and finding a whole person. That's why they don't put genetic samples in prison.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
you were saying that parts of the virus (particles) were being detected but not the virus particles. i adapted the terminology to your own ignorance.
finding a person's DNA is evidence that a person with an X genetic make up exists. heck...it's evidence that DNA belongs to Humans and not a monkey.
that's why finding the ENTIRE virus RNA is proof that HIV exists.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Um....no. That is not what I said. You fucked up th terminolgy because you are a "genius" who lives in his Mom's basement while pretending to be a medical student with no classes on youtube.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
i didn't "f up" anything at all.
i was a med student. i am a medical resident now.
classes on youtube? lol...
hilarious.
you just annoyed because i prove you wrong.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic You fucked up the terminology. Lol....you also can't read. You are NEVER in class. You're always on youtube PRETENDING to be a medical student. Students are usually in class or studying
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
uhm...i didn't "f up" anything. ask a doctor.
"never in class"? it's 4 a.m. and i don't have classes anymore.
"always on yt"? pure bullshit.
"pretending"? nope. i was one. now i am a resident doctor.
"or studying", hundreds, thousands of hours, yes. i did all that. i keep doing it.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic You're ALWAYS on youtube. That's the point.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
i am not always on youtube. it's funny when people say that.
it's actually hilarious.
even funnier considering that a group of people can share the same account.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic I already said I go to EXPERTS with identities an credentials that are easily verified.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
Harven is not an expert. his claims are entirely unsupported.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic YES Dr de Harven IS an expert. Google..Etienne De Harven.
Etienne de Harven M.D. is Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
and you think electron microscopy didn't evolve, knowledge didn't increase in the last 20 years? stupid you.
now go try cope with your HIV+ test.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic those tests don't stand up in court. They are totallyUNstandrdized crap.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
those tests do stand up in court.
where haven't they stand?
oh right... more articles with NO trial ID for me to read directly...lolol
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao...DUH! We've alreadybeen over this. If YOU have th evidence the prosecuting DA;s need to wn their cases go offer your assistance.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
why would they need my assistance? they are winning all cases.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin If you copy paste from the comments you get marked automatically as spam. Just take screenshots to put in another transidiot video.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin Ha! I KNOW...LOL
Trans will be flat out proven wrong and he doesn't care lol He just tries to pretendhe said something else. He is a "genius"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
J Virol. 1995 Sep;69(9):5640-9.
Variability of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O strains isolated from Cameroonian patients living in France.
hey! you are wrong again! lol
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao....HEY I go to experts with identities and credentials I can easily verify. That paper does NOT describe a DIRECT isolation. It's just some frankencrap they created in a petri dish.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
nope. you go to people who is retired for more than 2 decades, people who have no credentials in biology and you didn't prove his emeritus title. because in fact... he doesn't have one.
the papers i am posting present direct isolation of HIV.
"Viral RNA, extracted from these samples was used"
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao...Dr Harven and Dr Sanger DO have credentials in biology. We already went over that. Are you going to try claiming Dr De Harven isn't qualified AGAIN?!?!?
WOW! You really are one of the biggest"geniuses" I have ever met.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
De Harven didn't support any of his claims.
He asserts, presents bullshit and then concludes bullshit.
want me to read his article again? sure:
second column, first page: he refers to websites known for no credibility at all.
hey...either way... tomorrow your "cause" will remain as stupid as useless as always.
HA HA HA
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao...YOU have no crediblity at all. You just keep claming acknowledged experts in their field have no training.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
what "acknowledged experts"? name one.
Harven isn't an expert. he doesn't publish anything for more than 20 years.
you are full of shit.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Dr Etiene De Harven and Dr Heinz Ludwig Sanger lmao DUH! The ones were JUST talking about.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
when the new genetic vaccines or GM cell vaccines start to kick in i am sure you will cry and shout your aids denialism at your strongest level! lolol
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Nobody disputes the existance of immune problems so "aids" denier makes no sense. It;s more like being a body thetan denier.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
AIDS is ONE problem. solely caused by HIV.
nothing else.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
he was an MD. not anymore. i said: he isn't.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic You said he had no qualifications at all. You are either a liar or an idiot. It's hard to tell. I vote "genius" lol
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
what "truth"?
this?
Micron. 1998 Apr-Jun;29(2-3):123-38.
The life-cycle of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic "Up to today there is actually no single scientifically really convincing evidence for the existence of HIV. Not even once such a retrovirus has been isolated and purified by the methods of classical virology."
Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sanger, Emeritus Professor of Molecular Biology and Virology, Max-Planck-Institutes for Biochemistry, Munchen.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
AIDS. 1989 Nov;3(11):707-15.
A highly defective HIV-1 strain isolated from a healthy Gabonese individual presenting an atypical western blot.
you are wrong again.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin Ha! Yeah I got that too. he is a "genius"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
he has no references supporting any of his claims.
the ones he uses do not support what is seen.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao...which is it? Does he use "no references" OR does he use them? It can't be both at the same time you "genius"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
he uses references that do not support what is seen, ergo: no references support any of his claims.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
why would i read a book whose qualified experts who gave it a read define it as: "filled with lies, misunderstanding and nonsense"?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
he didn't invent electron microscope approach, LOL
that's a very stupid claim.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin There is NO way he even got as far as the entrance exam.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin Yep. Watch...he won't stop. It doesn't matter how many times he's proven wrong...he is literally too stupid to know whe to quit.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
you've never proven me wrong.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao...um....yes I did about 5 minutes ago when you claimed Dr Harven has no credentials you "genius". Oops lol...yes he does.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
and he has no present credentials. he has no knowledge on more than 2 decades of scientific knowledge.
he is retired, therefore not an expert.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao...um YES he does you "genius" Can't you read?
Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto
omg you are SUCH a "genius"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
he isn't emeritus professor.
when was he given that title?
i can't find any evidence for that title in his curriculum ( i just found it).
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao....you "genius"
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
he wrote a book without any sort of support for his claims.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin Lmao...oh yeah that's right trans the "genius" told us Dr De Harven has no credentials and doesn't work. It sounds like psychological projection to me.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
his 52 reference points to a 1983 paper... in order to try support a view that HIV was never isolated...
FAIL.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Um....yeah since the "discoverer" never isolated anything why do you think it's there?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
i just posted papers where they isolated HIV. want more?
sure:
Arch Virol. 1990;111(1-2):87-101.
The budding of defective human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) particles from cell clones persistently infected with HIV-1.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
i keep asking where is any reference to any of his "research"...where is it?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic He also has an article out in the Dec 2010 JPANDS. Google....Are HERVs an Answer to AIDS Mysteries?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
JPANDS, does Winter, summer, spring, etc. not "december 2010"
you ignoramus.
his paper fails right at the start. he refers to: "evidence suggests" and presents no references.
FAIL.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
so where is that paper where he makes that description?
it must be published if he did anything, right?
so where is it?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao...DUH!
de Harven E. Viremia in Friend murine leukemia: the electron microscope approach to the problem. Pathologie-Biologie 1965; 13: 125-134
you are such a "genius" trans
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
so i was wrong about Ettienne's qualifications regarding his understanding of pre-90s scientific knowledge.
so?
that doesn't mean he is right regarding HIV.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
no he didn't.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Lmao....people can google...Ettienne De Harven and see in 2 seconds who the "genius" is
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin Well trans DID notice all the isolation of the microvesicles lol
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
they did isolate HIV. read the paper, retard.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 1996 Aug;45(4):247-57.
Ultrastructure and morphogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
"cloned HIV"? idiot.
they obtained the virus from HIV positive patients, read the paper.
how can you be sure? because they took the HIV from people infected with HIV. you don't require to have AIDS in order to be be HIV +.
retard.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic You mean when they isolated those "microvesicles" you "genius"? You mean reading like THAT?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
they isolated the virus and microvesicles, retard.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic That isn't what it said.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
"We used Env-defective HIV-1 viruses for most of the studies to eliminate the possible formation of an apparently internal compartment resulting from fusion of two previously separate cells. The electron tomographic analyses with fixed, embedded cells were carried out with infectious HIV-1 BaL. Three days post-infection, the infected macrophages were harvested"
fresh.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
btw,...
"To characterize these microvesicles, HIV-1-infected and uninfected human T-cell lines were propagated and virus and microvesicles were purified "
so...they DID isolate HIV from the human cells.
in the paper that you mentioned.
LOL..another shot on your own foot!
LOLOL
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic A "microvesicle" isn't a retrovirus you "genius" Google a dictionary
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
microvesicle results in a cross detection. you retard.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin He's not an "aids" expert per se. He is an expert on electron micrographs with an emphasis on retroviruses. He had a recent article in JPANDS
Are HERVs an Answer to AIDS Mysteries?
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons - Published: 2010-09-04
Why is it so hard to isolate and purify "hiv"? Why has no one been able to see, by electron microscopy, a single HIV particle in the blood of AIDS patients, even those who have a "high viral load"?
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
not at all. he is not an expert on anything related to biology including electron micrographs.
"emphasis on retrovirus"? where is the proof for that?
"recent article in JPANDS"?
Bauer? who hasn't researched or published anything for decades now? lol
i see no such article at JPANDS, provide a direct reference, please.
i just posted a paper with isolation of HIV. want more? sure.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic yes he is. Google....Ettienne De Harven
Etienne de Harven M.D. is Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
ettienne de harven? is not a doctor. has no license to practice. and is a mere technician with no education in medicine.
that story is a pure lie. amazing the quantity of bullshit that you buy. LOLOL
transtlantic 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@transtlantic Um....NOT according to his CV.
Etienne de Harven M.D. is Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@transtlantic I DID provide a reference. You are just too much of a "genius" to see it.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
"The ratios of HIV-1 p24CA to HLA DR and beta 2-M were found to vary with respect to the HIV-1 isolate, host cell, and other factors. Electron microscopic analysis of microvesicles revealed that they consisted of particles of various sizes and morphologies. Although HIV-1 particles are known to contain some cellular proteins, microvesicles from HIV-1 infected H9 cells appeared to contain little or no HIV-1 gp120SU."
this means that the contamination is quite small.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
"same old extracts"? not at all.
they used fresh extracts for the research.
"mixed together"? what "sort of stuff"?
Bauer is not an AIDS expert. Virology is not a field that you learn in the main chemistry curriculum
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
"anecdotal [ˌænɛkˈdəʊtəl]
adj
containing or consisting exclusively of anecdotes rather than connected discourse or research conducted under controlled conditions"
perfectly describes ALL of the quotes you presented. NOT one presents one single study supporting any of their claims.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
"recently stressed"? another quote with more than 10 years of age... meaningless.
PCR tests are very accurate.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
PLoS Pathog. 2009 Sep;5(9):e1000591. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
Ion-abrasion scanning electron microscopy reveals surface-connected tubular conduits in HIV-infected macrophages.
i have more than 1000 papers with pictures of HIV taken from patients HIV +
just ask for more.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
i have a paper on my profile with electron microscope pictures of HIVirus and partial particles of HIV.
Neville isn't qualified in any given field of science.
so...another failed anedoctal writing that you presented.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
i am adding: "aids denialist", to your profile list.
you are dumb, uneducated, unqualified, biblical flood believer, christian moron, aids denialist... UFO conspiracy theorist to? HA HA HA!
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
"so many false positives"? nope. less than 1 per 1000, you dumb retard. and a positive test results in a second test, decreasing the % of false positive diagnosis, you moron.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
where was it shown not to be specific? are you retarded? ofc it has.
just say a number of papers that you require proving that. there are HUNDREDS!
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
moron... a thing can be 0,0X% you idiot.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
being specific for HIV antibodies means the tests are specific in detecting infection by HIV. as ONLY HIV will cause the production of those antibiodies. false positives result from cross reactions. which happen in less than 0,01% of the cases.
stupid fuck.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
pregancy only results in a false positive test in less than 1% of pregnant women who take the test.
i call that a very good test.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
nope. it only shows positive to less than 0,00009% of the people with other conditions that not HIV.
you clearly ignore what specificity is.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
detecting antibodies against HIV is a test for HIV, you fucking retard.
how the heck do you think we know when you are immune to HBV for example? you idiotic fuck.
HINT: it's by TESTING if you have anti-HB, you fucking idiot.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
lol...nope. you posted a line that shows that you have NOT a clue on what is an antibody! LOLOLOL
moron, what is an immunoglobulin? LOLOL
you still have not a clue!
LOLOL
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
he has no idea about more than 2 decades of scientific knowledge. and believes in the loch ness monster.
that says all about his unqualification.
and nope. I am far more qualified than Bauer regarding biology.
it's a fact.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
moron...the antibodies are SPECIFIC against the HIV, you retard.
you clearly have not a clue about basic IMMUNOLOGY.
btw, retard. those tests are done the SAME for flu, HPV, HBV, etc etc
EVERY SINGLE day.
with a specificity over 90%!
now fuck off, ignoramus.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
actually... ALL the manufacters of the test kits claim that their kits detect infection by HIV by an X sensibility and X specificity. just read any of their associated labels.
not all tests are for antibodies.
"only for screening blood", no shit. HIV spread in the body mainly by hematogenic pathways, you idiot.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
lol...only now did you figured out that he is over 80? LOLOl
moron... how much do you think science advanced since he left work?
lolol
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
i do know that you are an anedocte.
Bauer isn't a professor anymore. you dumbass.
plus...his former working field had nothing to do with biology. you moron.
qualified than me? not regarding biology. you dumbass.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@DishrackDarwin
the specificity of the tests used for HIV are over 95%. that means they only test POSITIVE to HIV.
learn about what is specificity. moron.
Bauer doesn't work, believes in the loch ness monster and has no qualifications to be talking about HIV tests.
more anedoctal crap.
transtlantic 1 year ago
Google....Verdict Of $2.5 Million Over False-Positive HIV Diagnosis Brings up Basic Problems With AIDS Testing and Treatment, Say Scientists
"Rodney Richards, Ph.D., worked on the development of antibody (ELISA) and genetic “viral load” tests for Amgen and holds some related patents. “The diagnosis of being HIV positive is based on arbitrary combinations of tests, none of which are approved for diagnosing HIV,” he says. “In fact there is no test for HIV. It’s just an illusion.”
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
what veridict? where's the link? that's another made up article. we see no direct link to any case at all!
Rodney Richards doesn't work anywhere. he was even expelled from working, right? that's what happens when you are a nutjob.
pure made up assertions without support. rodney richards provides no test supporting any of his claims.
where is his control group versus claimed to have HIV group test?
NOWHERE! he is full of shit.
transtlantic 1 year ago
“We did not purify [isolate] ... We saw some particles but they did not have the morphology [shape] typical of retroviruses ... They were very different ... What we did not have, as I have always recognized it, is that it was truly the cause of AIDS.”
Interview with Djamel Tahi-1997
— Dr. Luc Montagnier, Virologist, co-discoverer of HIV, Pasteur Institute, Paris
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
That's not the full quote from Luc Montaigner. anyone watching the FULL interview can easily SEE that he DID isolate the virus.
you even added a word he never said.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic Um....WRONG! I named my source peple can go and read it for themselves.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
nope, that's a webpage with links where the very first "link" directs you nowhere.
it's all bullshit. check it yourself.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic I already have. You are either an idiot or a liar. I don't care which. If YOU have the evidence the prosecuting DA's need to prosecute people then offer your expert services tothem.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
you have? not at all. you provided a news article of some sort from a known aids denialist website that presents NO direct link that would support any of their assertions.
ALL trials have a public record. where is it?
the DAs already prosecute with success thousands of people who do not declare that they are HIV +.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic since the US Supreme Court ruling they're having their cases dropped. Fact.
Tough shit. If YOU have he vidence they need to prosecute their cases go offer your services. It's that simple.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@kookaid
US supreme court rulings have an ID that allows any person with a net access to read the ruling. it's public access.
so...provide the ID for the ruling.
where is it?
you are full of shit. you are lying.
i do have the evidence: none of the cases you made up have a real ID number, meaning: you are lying.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
neworleanscrimewatch com
is a sham website.
why is there such in a website that adresses such a touchy subject?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@trans What does that site have to do with anything? Google....« More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges
"“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”
A fatal flaw with HIV tests leaves prosecutors with no credible witnesses from local, state or federal health agencies .."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
OMSJ director has no qualifications in any given field of science. the SOLE news is on his website without ANY sort of link to the trial case. for all i know: he is lying. which is not unheard of from people who want to explore ignorant HIV positive people.
there is NO fatal flaw.
you are full of shit.
where is the direct link to ANY of the cases that you mentioned?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic DUH! You already said that and I already pointed out that he;s commenting on law and legal cases. Direct links ARE included. I don't know if you're a liar or an idiot and I don't care.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
how can a person with NO qualification in law comment with credibility any law of legal cases? it can, but it's a mere uneducated opinion.
the direct links ARE NOT included.
if they are...why can't you present me one?
you are full of shit, kookaid.
transtlantic 1 year ago
Google....Court Trials Unnerve HIV Propagandists
"It began in 2009 with Eneydi Torres.....Several months later, Magdalena Mays was arrested on similar charges. But like the Torres case, prosecutors dropped their HIV-related complaint against her."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
i sse no court trials made. where is the link to the case?
why are there only aids denialist websites with ties to lawyers groups and NO direct links to the cases?
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic There are direct links to the stories as reported in themedia. If you want the case numbers ask Clark Baker
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
there is not one single direct link to the media.
try show it.
"ask clark baker"? the cases are for public scrutiny.
why hasn't clark baker put it up?
it's obvious he is selling something.
transtlantic 1 year ago
@transtlantic You are either lying or an idiot. Anyone ca google....« More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges
get tothe site and see what's what.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
there's no direct links to any of the cases.
it's all a sham.
transtlantic 1 year ago
Google.....More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges
"“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”
A fatal flaw with HIV tests leaves prosecutors with no credible witnesses from local, state or federal health agencies ...."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago