Parallel Universes and how to change reality

[dogbatcatheryn]

it seems nuts,but actually makes sense.if these theories are true.it explains miracles very nicely....faith and the whole ball of yarn......are actually possible from a scientific standpoint.it even explains forgiveness by tying it to the past is not set in stone either.

[TheUltimamaster]

"Possible" not necessarily true.

[yrbaptiste]

Finally an explanation of what I have been thinking all along

[AwakeningtoMe]

This makes me think that the world is like a spider's web with infinite possibilities but for those able to navigate this web they are able to experience all these probabilities simultaneously. Therefore all outcomes are possible and nothing is impossible if all the outcomes are already there and exist. But comes into question is if there really is freewill and whether we can change things or if it's just connecting with an alternate version of ourselves.

[azegyvalaki]

I just wonder if we can alter our (relative) memories by choosing another conscious version of ourselves as well as we can alter our present reality. It was not exactly clear from the video. Anyway, it's a fascinating revolutionary idea! (However, it's not so revolutionary as the ancient buddhist philosophy concludes something similar than the recent science has just started to do.)

[Theegamedude]

Great video

[spenc193]

I mean, if any of our parallel selves (assuming the subset of those with the awareness we now have of the possibility of shifting) is able to shift, what is stopping from our selves from being displaced by another self that has the intention to assume the reality we now occupy? The universe would have to account for this by changing some small detail elsewhere. And how does this theory account for entropy? Sure a conscious shift could decrease entropy, so where is it made up for?

[spenc193]

I guess there are a few details I don't understand. First: how can we assume anything conscious is completely novel? You say we create a new probability space when we "watch the bird", but that really is just the effect of the bird having caught our attention, and possibly an affinity for birds, the cause of something in our past? Does anything really exist without cause? 2nd: If all possibilities exist simultaneously, how can we shift to another without displacing the parallel "self" there?

[Raymucation]

Awesome upload. Love it. Mahalo.

[JeffersonBraswell]

The following statement in the summary description of the YouTube post (a significant paraphrase/change in the statement in the video) is also not quite correct: "Mainstream science is now recognizing the existence of parallel realities" Note the difference with the quote from the video. The existence of parallel realities is a hypothesis derived from string theory, but it has certainly not been 'accepted' by 'mainstream science'.

[JeffersonBraswell]

Rather, when a large number of independent events are measured, it describes the distributions of outcomes of multiple events, not multiple outcomes of one event.

[JeffersonBraswell]

(2) "mainstream quantum science has accepted the theory of infinite probable realities" -- the key word is *probable* realities. Just because there are many probable realities does not mean that all realities in the future do in fact exist.

[JeffersonBraswell]

(1) "only when measured by the consciousness of an observer do these probable states collapse into a single event as a wave or a particle" -- this is not correct. Attributing the act of measurement as requiring consciousness to establish state misrepresents the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. It is the energy applied when taking a measurement that establishes state, not the conscious perception of it.

[Dan76135]

matrix 

[Agui007]

So it's not how do I shift from parallel reality to the next but what will I shift to. It's like when you're really have a good time, time appears to be going faster, or you are shifting more quickly from one to the other. You are your own unique universe drawing in what energy you put out.

[vasya128]

I didn't understand why "pausing for a second to watch the bird fly" at 4:24 isn't one of those possibilities within the plane? Why does this particular possibility needs to create another plane of possibilities?

In other words what is the difference between: (A) go straight (B) go left (C) go right (D) pause and watch the bird fly?

[OxygenForTheMind]

@vasya128 The plane I describe in the video is a plane of predictive probabilities, not possibilities. I am suggesting that stopping to watch a bird is spontaneous act with no predictive probability and which may dramatically alter future probabilities.

[vasya128]

@OxygenForTheMind Ok I think I'm getting it now, great video by the way!

[DonSSanders]

This whole idea is an illusion caused by the delusion that all will be explained when we unite quantum physics and relativity. There are AT LEAST two whole realms of physics not even understood or even detected. To keep insisting we can unify the 3 realms (scales) of physics we know is to attempt to build a complete house with 1 board and 1 door.

[nickharvey7]

Could the parallel universes of Hugh Everett and the multiple dimension of String Theory be future possibilities of what might happen within our one three dimensional Universe? A dynamic Universe that we can interact with creating our own future!

[OxygenForTheMind]

@nickharvey7 Yes it could. The actual mechanism for creating our own future is not yet clear. However, discovery of phantom DNA by Vladimir Poponin suggests that the 90+% of DNA, which seems to have no purpose and has been labeled 'junk' DNA, is multidimensional and may be the prime catalyst in the creation of personal reality.

Russian scientists under Dr. Pjotr Garjajev have been able to repair DNA strands using human speech modulated lasers! This gives new meaning to the power affirmations

[DecentralizedByGuilt]

"Mainstream science is now recognizing the existence of parallel realities"

That is not true.

[silvercat151]

@DecentralizedByGuilt Well, not in your chosen reality :)

[DecentralizedByGuilt]

@silvercat151 “Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people”

[XtinaFerrari]

free will means that you can choose whatever version of yourself, those versions already exist, yes, but you can CHOOSE.

[OxygenForTheMind]

@XtinaFerrari Choosing which probable self you will experience might be a semantic illusion since the other probable selves would all think they had chosen their particular version from the already existing choices.

(At time 4:04) I am suggesting that free will allows the emergence of probabilities that NEVER existed before, thus creating a sixth dimension of reality.

[shood1943]

@XtinaFerrari A very good point. Jesus made a choice when offered temptation. He said no to temptation.

[S944Porsche]

now what about the universe where they decided that expanding probabilities isn't true? are we an extension of their probability or not?

[OxygenForTheMind]

@S944Porsche Interesting question.

I can only speculate that the universe you describe would a dead-end appendage. It would be an extension of our probability but we wouldn't be an extension of their probability.

[DeSwiss]

"Seth Speaks"

[OxygenForTheMind]

@DeSwiss Yes, the Seth material was the source and inspiration for the sixth dimension and 'Value Fulfillment'.

[shadowxryu]

so basically what this vid is telling me is that I can change my future by just thinking about what I want to accomplish and then trying my hardest to achieve my reality.

[OxygenForTheMind]

@shadowxryu The best way of explaining this is that you imagine the future AS IF IT HAS ALREADY OCCURRED.

"trying my hardest" presupposes a deeply held belief in what you don't want and which you are trying to overcome.

[shadowxryu]

@OxygenForTheMind wow. that makes so much sense, I really get it now. mind blown...

[TheMisfity]

Would the probable self mean every time I don't try to saw my arm off somewhere out there I'm sawing my arm off, I'm sitting behind my desk and sudden'y I decide to saw my arm off? It doesn't sound quite right to me.

[OxygenForTheMind]

@TheMisfity There would have to be a compelling reason for contemplating sawing your arm off: Such as your arm is caught in a trap in the wilderness and you will die if you don't cut it off. That bizarre reality would have no resonance to other probable realities and the branch would just be an anomaly.

[TheMisfity]

@OxygenForTheMind That's what I mean. How can there be a probable self when effects only happen when there is a cause just like a domino effect there can only be one outcome eliminating the possibility for any probable self... my only qualm with this theoretical physics and the like.

[TheMisfity]

@OxygenForTheMind And sure you can think "will I have a Tuna or Egg sandwich for lunch" but surely even these decisions are ratiocinatically derived in your brain purely on the current environment which in it's self is a direct result of the previous moment's environment with the future projected in the same way.

[kokopelli314]

In the multiverse, there is a set of I's that can communicate across the 6th dimension. It is my intention to be a member of that set.

[tobiaslarsgunnar]

this is also just a 'mind' imagining a possible model for what may be going on around us. all models (so far) and I would suggest this one - are incomplete, partial and really just mind scenarios.

[OxygenForTheMind]

@tobiaslarsgunnar: Totally agree that it is a limited model. Rather than just making an assertion about the power of intention, hopefully the video provides a description of how intention can change reality.

[tobiaslarsgunnar]

@OxygenForTheMind it's a huge step forward - of opening and allowing for a flexibility in consciousness creating our reality. Great presentation, reposted on our Course of Awakening on FB.

[tobiaslarsgunnar]

'Scientism' followers will be disturbed by this video - those interested in real Awakening and re-membering our innate abilities will be encouraged by this video.

[kingthamus]

"let's get practical?" How do you get from multiple dimensions to the bald assertion that "intensely focusing" on an alternate reality will create one? There is no proposed mechanism by which that happens, and it is a non sequitur on its face. Neurons fire on the macro scale and therefore cannot impinge on quantum scale events.

[OxygenForTheMind]

@kingthamus: Your question about how "intensely focusing" creates an alternate reality I thought was powerfully evidenced in the tumor healing segment where reality shifted dramatically for the patient where the tumor disappeared in 3 minutes.

I suggest that the mechanism for this event was the existence of a parallel reality in which the patient didn't have the tumor and she shifted laterally to that reality.

[OxygenForTheMind]

Thank you @MrSabazius you raise an interesting question. In modeling the fifth dimension of all probabilities as fixed, implied total predestination - albeit very rich. The 6D axis demonstrates the impact of uncertainty, which admittedly I extended to include human intention as a change agent. The alternative would be to try and describe the fifth dimension as not fixed, but an ever changing maelstrom of uncertainty. By the way mathematicians are working with ten dimensions.

[scott5878]

bullshit. I caught the fallacious reasoning early on. Move along. Nothing to see here.

[anon8109]

Pseudoscience and metaphysical nonsense.

The video starts off sounding all scientific but then veers off into wild speculation about magical healing powers and other magical mind powers.

I am dissapoint.

[JohnLeavesDead12345]

would Déjà vu be explained by these alternative realities? possibility our bodies still feeling a connection to the "path not taken?" Or the two separate paths reconverting? Another question? would these alternative realities take up exponentially more space at time progressed? Could it ever reach its breaking point?

[OxygenForTheMind]

@JohnLeavesDead12345: Déjà vu could be explained by any of the three questions you posed.

You ask: "Do alternatives take up more space and time?" The model I gave suggests that they do. Alternatively, you could consider that both space and time are illusions invented in the mind of the observer - interpretations of energy forms.

[mralfredotv]

Makes sense but it's too good to be true

[yousefamar]

Forgive my ignorance, but what if all our actions and decisions are simply inevitable if you assume that what we do is as a result of sensory input, reflection and experience? Everything we do, be it tangible or abstract, seems to have had a reason behind it. I can't say "What if I had decided not to leave my house?" because I would have never decided it after weighing whether or not I should do it. To me, the course of electrochemical impulses in our brain seem singular; possibly predictable.

[OxygenForTheMind]

@yousefamar: If, as you say, all our actions are singular and inevitable, there would only be one dimension - time. But then we wouldn't need a brain to think since everything is preordained and what would be the purpose of life?

[yousefamar]

@OxygenForTheMind I guess the purpose of life s a whole different ballgame. I think it wouldn't be much different if our thoughts truly could induce multiple realities to exist. All I'm saying is that if the fifth and sixth dimensions really do exist, I would imagine our thoughts to play a very little role. The way I see it, our decisions are a direct result of sense-experience and reflection and since they lead to further experiences, the cycle outcome is inevitable. (character limit reached..)

[yousefamar]

@OxygenForTheMind I mean, when considering quantum superposition, for instance, sure all those branches could exist. I just think that we are entirely controlled by our brain which is in turn controlled by our environment and possibly even our genes and hence our decisions are completely dependant on that.

[yousefamar]

@OxygenForTheMind I find it hard to believe that our decisions could go in two ways; no matter the situation. The fact that we decide one thing over another, including choosing not to decide anything, alone shows that there is some bias. "Free will" is a strange concept. "We" are always under the control of our brains. We will do what our brain commands us. As such, I don't think that our decisions are "free" and could add to the branches in any way. Kinda depressing but that's what I think.

[TheMisfity]

@OxygenForTheMind Films are predetermined and we still watch them, some times over and over.

[24tuccu]

@TheMisfity couldnt agree more, great truth in that, but why do we do this, the only thing i can say is whatever makes us happy!!

[joostschouppe]

- Why does there need to be a purpose to life?

- Our actions are indeed inevitable, within a certain experienced universe - different outcomes at a sub-molecular level may generate different decisions, but we obviously cannot decide what should happen at the sub-molecular level. So all possible decisions may exist as parallel universes, this does not mean that we get to choose between different universes. Within any strain of a multiverse is a simple cause/effect relationship between all events.

[OxygenForTheMind]

@joostschouppe you write: "we obviously cannot decide what should happen at the sub-molecular level".

Dr. William Tiller demonstrated scientific experiments to change the ph of water by plus or minus 1 ph using the the power of focused intention over a distance of 2000 miles. This kind of work has been repeated many times and is well documented in Lynne McTaggart's book 'The Intention Experiment'

[kingthamus]

@OxygenForTheMind

The Intention Experiment is not scientific, so it is grossly misleading to insinuate that it is. As for changing the ph of water with intention, give me a break. The ph of water is highly variable, and I've never seen a study that controls for all the factors that can alter the ph of water.

[jsteiger2228]

A great explanation of what I consider to be the true nature of reality and human experience.  I do not agree with your theories beyond 6:05, however....

[Shadowlande]

Thank you @jsteiger2228. Your comment that you do not agree (beyond 6:05) suggests that you do not believe in the power of intent to change reality? The model I presented implies that multiple worlds are created from conscious intents.

However, beliefs are created and reinforced from the materialization of repetitive intents. If you don't believe you can change reality, these options will not exist in your field of probabilities and you are therefore perfectly right in your viewpoint.

[j1514120119]

Causality is always present in the macro world, thus all worlds would be extremely similar, almost identical. Saying that multiple paths or decisions in the macro world can happen is like saying that in some of these worlds causality will be violated. Saying that we can consciously change to another world is irrelevant because it changes nothing.

[OxygenForTheMind]

The double slit experiment illustrates that it is the intention of the observer that causes the different outcome. Multiple paths are indeed causal but exist in superposition as probabilities until collapsed into a single observable event. This video explores the impact of intention on which causal reality is experienced.

[10thdim]

Nice job! You captured a lot of important ideas here. Keep it up!