Problem is, Joseph Smith provided samples of reformed Egyptian to Anthon. Those samples are known. JS claims Anthon Confirmed the glyphs were "Syrriac, Egyptian, Arabic, Chaldaic". Thus, we have a claim of evidense JS in print. Also JS claim is Anthon Confirmed JS. And when JS says the word "Mormon" is from "More" in English, we have More, so to speak, Reformed Egyptian. Sadly, no such language/alphabet exists. And the glyphs are letters, not hieroglyphs. And English didn't exist until c325AD
EVIDENCE : Ass, Bull, Calf, Cattle, Cow, domestic Goat, Horse, Ox, domestic Sheep, Sow, Swine, & Elephants. None of these animals MENTIONED in the Book of Mormon existed during the B of M timescale. *-*
Where as The Nephite would have co-existed with .Coatimundis, Deer, Jaguars, Tapir, Monkeys, Sloths, Turkeys and are NOT MENTIONED in the Book of Mormon..................
there is no evidence in this video of the language spoke by Nephi or Moroni. So to say that the language would have changed is irrelevant.
With the bible, i think the first book Job was written approx 3500 years ago, and the last book was around 100AD. And all other books are in between, and we have thousands of manuscripts dating close to the original writings for most of the bible. We know the full languages Ancient Hebrew, the Aramaic dialect and Greek.
Book of Mormon True? Which one? How do you know? What about the internal contradictions? How about the stuff that never existed? How about the false prophesies? Where is the proof?
The backyard professor has BLOCKED me .. .Hebraic B of M Of course the book of mormon sounds hebrew it quotes extensively from the hebrew book. like 20 some chapters of Isaiah . NHM = Nahom It is suggested that the pronunciation of NHM is unknown and may not relate to Nahom at all is mormon wishful thinking. Where did JosephSmith get the name ? A. The King James version of the bible. Nahom as a variant of the Biblical names Naham (1 Chron. 4:19), Nehum (Ne. 7:7) and Nahum (Na. 1:1).
I remember you guys claiming that Alma was a Latin Female name... then proof showed up that a jewish noble man had a son named Alma... Go figure that one. You wont... you'll just move on to the next point to exploit until it is confirmed that you are wrong yet again.
@Sk8er408 As you sight no references I have no idea what your talking about.
But for the record Sk8er408 RE: all things hebrew. Ethan Smith "View of the Hebrews" is an 1823 book (December 19, 1762 – August 29, 1849) Could possibility be source material for the Book of Mormon, which Mormons believe was translated from ancient golden plates by their prophet Joseph Smith, Jr.
@Sk8er408 LDS officials have now changed the text of the Introduction to the Book of Mormon, that the Lamanites "are the principal ancestors of the American Indians." The new text says only that the Lamanites "are among the ancestors of the American Indians."
an admission of error ? why else would there be a need to alter the B of M. ?
@Sk8er408 The claim " The book of Mormon is the most correct book ever" seems your now comparing it to the bible that your church advocates is full of miss translations and error.
Not Mormon... I share lots with them and you... I just differ wtih you on the nature of God. He is not, 3 but one or 1 but three... nor is he ink and paper. Then maybe other small things.
So did you like the example? do you hold to this infallibility doctrine that makes a book equal to god?
Ya i really believe this crap this is a insult to the Mayan culture period the church is going to ruin american history with dogmatic bull crap. Where the proof? you have failed at all levels of evidence come on you talk about honesty here show us the beef? you know what happens to liers.
It is a volume of scripture relating God's dealings with ancient people in the Americas, in much the same way that the Bible is a record of God's dealing with people in one region of the Old World. With the Bible, the Book of Mormon is a second witness, confirming the validity of Biblical doctrine and verifying the divinity of Jesus Christ through the inspired words of other sheep in Christ's fold (see John 10:16).
@d4drules Jews were not the only. Judah didn't even recieve the birthright from Jacob. It was Joseph, and Jacob had 12 sons, not one. SO therefore it was the gentiles and the 12 twelve tribes of Israel, and not just judah.
The book of Mormon families that migrated out identify themselves as descendants of Joseph thru Ephraim, and Manesseh. Ezekiel 37:15-17 This prophecy indicates that Two records will be one. Record of Judah (bible), and record of Joseph (BoM.)
I don't get it. From the conference pulpit, leaders have stated that true faith and a testimony will never come from ancient scripture or archaeological evidence. Why are they attempting to use Moronis' text as evidence? Is there a double standard here?
Fictional people? mentioned in a fabricated story made a non-existent journey to some vague geographical area where they formed enormous nations, fought massive wars in undisclosed locations, wrote contradictory records in an unknown language and subsequently disappeared without leaving a? single shred of evidence they ever existed.
Bible:
Real people? in real locations, provable history, comprehensive archaeological support.
We can visit Jerusalem. Mormons can't find Bountiful
@LDS4Life71 if god wants the world too know his word he's not going to show it to one person through a
stone. lol thats funny and on plates that god took back so the world could not confirm is true or false. just becuse smith said it was so. the word of a man just a man no more no less.
@d4drules God didn't just create Jews and Christians in the Middle East. He created ALL mankind. He caused the Jews to be scattered into the crowds of the Gentiles. So did He just write those scattered Jews off as "unsaved" just because they had lost access to the scriptures due to their initial disobedience? Is there no balm in Gilead for them as well? Or was it just for people living in and around Jerusalem and in the area of the 7 churches mentioned in Revelation?
@LDS4Life71 The Jewish balm is the same as that for the Japanese, Arab, etc. Jesus Christ. Not Joseph Christ. Why were SA Jews were building pyramids, using strange glyphs but no reformed Egyptian and performing ritual human sacrifice. Why did Jews bury Olmec, Mayan,etc at the bottom of pyramids.Why would Mormon walk 4000miles with 60lbs of "gold" and bury it in a drumlin in NY and leave not a word of it? Why are the towns in the BofM found in NY and not SA? So many questions so little time.
Remember that they have found evidences of kings living in the region as early as 396BC and they had a temple started as early as 500BC. I hope you're are going to take closer look for the history of the Maya is being rewritten as we speak.
If they are saying that a language has morphed into Mayan, it is several languages (Hebrew and Egyptian at least). and it seems to me that Egyptian does resemble Mayan in form. But mostly this video is just talking about linguistic changes.
Problem is, Joseph Smith provided samples of reformed Egyptian to Anthon. Those samples are known. JS claims Anthon Confirmed the glyphs were "Syrriac, Egyptian, Arabic, Chaldaic". Thus, we have a claim of evidense JS in print. Also JS claim is Anthon Confirmed JS. And when JS says the word "Mormon" is from "More" in English, we have More, so to speak, Reformed Egyptian. Sadly, no such language/alphabet exists. And the glyphs are letters, not hieroglyphs. And English didn't exist until c325AD
IExposeMormonism 1 day ago
Retarded. No real linguist thinks that any Native American languages are related to the Semitic languages. This is so dumb; it hurts.
jewz456 1 month ago
EVIDENCE : Ass, Bull, Calf, Cattle, Cow, domestic Goat, Horse, Ox, domestic Sheep, Sow, Swine, & Elephants. None of these animals MENTIONED in the Book of Mormon existed during the B of M timescale. *-*
Where as The Nephite would have co-existed with .Coatimundis, Deer, Jaguars, Tapir, Monkeys, Sloths, Turkeys and are NOT MENTIONED in the Book of Mormon..................
great correlation of evidence . NOT *o*
kramd1 9 months ago
there is no evidence in this video of the language spoke by Nephi or Moroni. So to say that the language would have changed is irrelevant.
With the bible, i think the first book Job was written approx 3500 years ago, and the last book was around 100AD. And all other books are in between, and we have thousands of manuscripts dating close to the original writings for most of the bible. We know the full languages Ancient Hebrew, the Aramaic dialect and Greek.
Biblical Jesus or Mormon Jesus?
RenegadeMaster07 11 months ago
as happened perhaps most famously when a verse in Second Nephi was changed from "white and delightsome" to "pure and delightsome"
kramd1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Book of Mormon True? Which one? How do you know? What about the internal contradictions? How about the stuff that never existed? How about the false prophesies? Where is the proof?
rickgigliotti 1 year ago
The backyard professor has BLOCKED me .. .Hebraic B of M Of course the book of mormon sounds hebrew it quotes extensively from the hebrew book. like 20 some chapters of Isaiah . NHM = Nahom It is suggested that the pronunciation of NHM is unknown and may not relate to Nahom at all is mormon wishful thinking. Where did JosephSmith get the name ? A. The King James version of the bible. Nahom as a variant of the Biblical names Naham (1 Chron. 4:19), Nehum (Ne. 7:7) and Nahum (Na. 1:1).
kramd1 1 year ago
@kramd1
I remember you guys claiming that Alma was a Latin Female name... then proof showed up that a jewish noble man had a son named Alma... Go figure that one. You wont... you'll just move on to the next point to exploit until it is confirmed that you are wrong yet again.
Sk8er408 1 year ago
@Sk8er408 As you sight no references I have no idea what your talking about.
But for the record Sk8er408 RE: all things hebrew. Ethan Smith "View of the Hebrews" is an 1823 book (December 19, 1762 – August 29, 1849) Could possibility be source material for the Book of Mormon, which Mormons believe was translated from ancient golden plates by their prophet Joseph Smith, Jr.
kramd1 1 year ago
@kramd1
Really... And the OT is not the source of the NT?
Sk8er408 1 year ago
@Sk8er408 and your point is ?
kramd1 1 year ago
@kramd1
Exactly.
Sk8er408 1 year ago
@Sk8er408 LDS officials have now changed the text of the Introduction to the Book of Mormon, that the Lamanites "are the principal ancestors of the American Indians." The new text says only that the Lamanites "are among the ancestors of the American Indians."
an admission of error ? why else would there be a need to alter the B of M. ?
kramd1 1 year ago
@kramd1
I just read something the other day that they want to remove "booty" from the bible... what is your point?
Sk8er408 1 year ago
@Sk8er408 The claim " The book of Mormon is the most correct book ever" seems your now comparing it to the bible that your church advocates is full of miss translations and error.
kramd1 1 year ago
@kramd1
My church... what is my church? And yes... the bible is full of mistranslations and errors.
example...
James 1:13
Genesis 22:1
Sk8er408 1 year ago
@Sk8er408 are you not Mormon? Your church with your reasoning seem to be a good match.
kramd1 1 year ago
@kramd1
Not Mormon... I share lots with them and you... I just differ wtih you on the nature of God. He is not, 3 but one or 1 but three... nor is he ink and paper. Then maybe other small things.
So did you like the example? do you hold to this infallibility doctrine that makes a book equal to god?
Sk8er408 1 year ago
@Sk8er408 skater , your a cryptic riddler. what example 3 in 1 , i in 3, God is not a book ?
kramd1 1 year ago
@kramd1
Cryptic... I laid it out plainly.
example...
James 1:13
Genesis 22:1
Sk8er408 1 year ago
Ya i really believe this crap this is a insult to the Mayan culture period the church is going to ruin american history with dogmatic bull crap. Where the proof? you have failed at all levels of evidence come on you talk about honesty here show us the beef? you know what happens to liers.
wachnathan 1 year ago
It is a volume of scripture relating God's dealings with ancient people in the Americas, in much the same way that the Bible is a record of God's dealing with people in one region of the Old World. With the Bible, the Book of Mormon is a second witness, confirming the validity of Biblical doctrine and verifying the divinity of Jesus Christ through the inspired words of other sheep in Christ's fold (see John 10:16).
LDS4Life71 1 year ago
@LDS4Life71 how can i become a god of my own world ?
d4drules 10 months ago
@LDS4Life71 the other sheep are the gentiles. remember to the jews and jesus was a jew
there only two kinds of pepole jews or gentiles. other sheep.
d4drules 10 months ago
@d4drules Jews were not the only. Judah didn't even recieve the birthright from Jacob. It was Joseph, and Jacob had 12 sons, not one. SO therefore it was the gentiles and the 12 twelve tribes of Israel, and not just judah.
The book of Mormon families that migrated out identify themselves as descendants of Joseph thru Ephraim, and Manesseh. Ezekiel 37:15-17 This prophecy indicates that Two records will be one. Record of Judah (bible), and record of Joseph (BoM.)
LDS4Life71 10 months ago
"In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established" - 2 Corinthians 13:1
LDS4Life71 1 year ago
I don't get it. From the conference pulpit, leaders have stated that true faith and a testimony will never come from ancient scripture or archaeological evidence. Why are they attempting to use Moronis' text as evidence? Is there a double standard here?
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
Book of Mormon:
Fictional people? mentioned in a fabricated story made a non-existent journey to some vague geographical area where they formed enormous nations, fought massive wars in undisclosed locations, wrote contradictory records in an unknown language and subsequently disappeared without leaving a? single shred of evidence they ever existed.
Bible:
Real people? in real locations, provable history, comprehensive archaeological support.
We can visit Jerusalem. Mormons can't find Bountiful
martlut 1 year ago
Comment removed
1980vince 1 year ago
Comment removed
LDS4Life71 1 year ago
@LDS4Life71 if god wants the world too know his word he's not going to show it to one person through a
stone. lol thats funny and on plates that god took back so the world could not confirm is true or false. just becuse smith said it was so. the word of a man just a man no more no less.
d4drules 10 months ago
@d4drules God didn't just create Jews and Christians in the Middle East. He created ALL mankind. He caused the Jews to be scattered into the crowds of the Gentiles. So did He just write those scattered Jews off as "unsaved" just because they had lost access to the scriptures due to their initial disobedience? Is there no balm in Gilead for them as well? Or was it just for people living in and around Jerusalem and in the area of the 7 churches mentioned in Revelation?
LDS4Life71 10 months ago
@LDS4Life71 The Jewish balm is the same as that for the Japanese, Arab, etc. Jesus Christ. Not Joseph Christ. Why were SA Jews were building pyramids, using strange glyphs but no reformed Egyptian and performing ritual human sacrifice. Why did Jews bury Olmec, Mayan,etc at the bottom of pyramids.Why would Mormon walk 4000miles with 60lbs of "gold" and bury it in a drumlin in NY and leave not a word of it? Why are the towns in the BofM found in NY and not SA? So many questions so little time.
IExposeMormonism 1 day ago
is this a joke? We can trace linguistic changes over time, Mayan and Hebrew have NOTHING in common.
Michael0VCSU 2 years ago
It's no joke! They have found HEBREW in Guatemala and Belize and as far north as Tennessee and New Mexico.
The majority of clues linking the book of Mormon is where the largest pyramid in the world sits, covered in Jungle in Guatemala.
These men are correct.
LDSapologist71 2 years ago
Remember that they have found evidences of kings living in the region as early as 396BC and they had a temple started as early as 500BC. I hope you're are going to take closer look for the history of the Maya is being rewritten as we speak.
LDSapologist71 2 years ago
who is "they" and please tell me where "they" have found Hebrew in the Americas?
I will accept ANY peer-reviewed reputable scientific research
Michael0VCSU 2 years ago
Archaeologists in Guatemala. Not necesarily LDS ones.
LDSapologist71 2 years ago
If they are saying that a language has morphed into Mayan, it is several languages (Hebrew and Egyptian at least). and it seems to me that Egyptian does resemble Mayan in form. But mostly this video is just talking about linguistic changes.
RegnevaWTone 2 years ago
The language morphed from Hebrew to Mayan? Way beyond belief.
awolLDSasap 2 years ago