@nutajoke claiming he has a GTI VR6... you clearly dont own one cause this doesn't exist. and I doubt the sentra would beat either one of em. the new sentra is styled like a subcompact car. its narrow but its sitting high to improve interior room... thats ugly as fuck
@CEREALBOX9311 civic si is 197 horse and 139 lb-ft of torque, but much better handling...0-60 is 6.3 seconds in si, 6.9 in spec-v. clear as day...and new civic is 201 horse and 179 ft-lb of torque (approx for torque cant remember exact. spec v is cheaper though, there is no doubt it is good value for price but it is nothing special
same engine as that of 02 altima, same torque but build with different specs to produce a 200hp car. Not bad, but i wouldnt be surprised in the future if you see these cars with head gasket problems as early altima's had.....
I have this car...the spec v in gray...it is really good fun!! the handling is not great but you can still make it dance...it has enough power for daily commuting and it has enough ground clearance for snow or floods...if you keep it stock for daily driving you can't beat this car. Steering wheel has great feel and feedback, great 6 speeds manual and the engine is bullet proof...the engine loves to rev high all day long!! am saving for the STI :D
save yourself 10 grand over a gti and get this??? I bought a brand new 2008 GTI with DSG transmission for 24,300. It handles many times better and with a 5-600 dollar ECU flash will give the GTI 260hp and 303 ft lbs torque at the crank.
I own a 2008 Spec-V and I could tell you that it's the most fun you could get for your money. I owned a 2004 GTI VR6 and a 2006 Audi A4 2.0 all cars with a manual transmission and all at 200hp. The Sentra is faster than the GTI but slower than the Audi. The only disadvantage is that the handling is pretty bad on the SPEC-V....As a car lover I could say that it's still lots of fun to drive.
@4G63PWR im thinking the same thing man. Japanese car makers usually fine tune suspension to perfection. If he cant drive it then thats his problem. I just bought a used 2008 one and so far I love it. Cant wait to put it to a real test on the track soon
it is great value... but my advice.. work alittle bit harder. spend the extra 4 grand on a GTI. same power but much better handling. the mazda speed 3 torque steers like a pig so it cant put its power as well as the vw. too bad for nissan they were very close at getting it right.. but hey for 21k this is still real good value.
Anybody who says the MS3 torque steers has never driven an MS3. It has a DSC control system to limit power in 1st and 2nd gear if wheel spin is detected. Practically eliminates torque steer all together. I'll agree thiugh a FWD car would not be my first choice for a performance oriented car seeing as I drive RX-7's but an MS3 is top on my list for fun DD
If I'm gonna spend $22K on a "performance" FWD car, I'm gonna buy a Mazdaspeed 3. 263hp and 280lbs/ft of torque for $22k. It would run circles around that bananna and look better doing it
Wow you're a stupid Honda fanbois who doesn't know how to read or research. The Speed 3 starts at $23,410 before incentives and bargaining. I've seen people drive them off the lot for $21k. Grow up, VTAK isn't god
Broke down? Sorry, I know how to take car of my vehicles where they don't break down. I'd like to think I'm mrchanically incline seeing as how I took a complete car, yanked the motor, radiator, and oil cooler out, changed oil pans, had it swapped into another car, wired and running in less than 12 hours. Plus warranties kick ass
All companies use a similar version of vtec, others just make it less pronounced.
Honda's DOHC VTEC system uses a slight dip right before crossover to make the switch to the high cam more dramatic. Look at any DOHC stock dyno you will see it.
Which is why once you tune it, that dip goes away and the kick vtec usually gives goes away but the car is quite a bit faster even if it doesn't feel it.
He's KIDDING. My SER-V does 0-60 in 5.97. Cops don't see me, 85MPH all day.
7.2 sec 0-60? HAH! LOWBALLED to fool countries where they TAX HP & "can't handle the truth" Car MUST make 235HP moving 2997 lbs. that fast. 5.97 thru 2nd gear, just drive it like you stole it.
15000 miles old expect 37 MPG in 6th at 55-60 (high test) 33.7 MPG (regular) 28-29.5 around town. 0-20W oil, Fram filter, tires 44 pounds all way round.
ma friend got one and i drove it aint that bad ittz a fun car 2 drive they made to b a civic si killer my friend has one one too id take sn si plus itz faster
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
20-22 grand? LOL! .. GTI? is this dude high? GTI would smoke this shit. I dont even like american "Muscle" but a mustang would smoke this and probally ten times the amount of stability and comfort. Not worth it. 2009 Nissan GT-R .. different story/
Why would you compare a 300 HP 4.6L V8 muscle car to a 200 HP 2.5L 4 Cyl. tuner? Thats like comparing apples and oranges. Are you some pissed off GTI owner or something?
ive driven both a nissan and a honda... i must say the honda's engine is more reliable, and it just sounds better
with the nissan, the engine sounds like its gonna break apart, its more rough compared to the honda's... hondas are high pitched, and they just sound beautiful lol
your kidding..honda got vtec.thats the sound you hear over 5k rpm..it needs that extra kick just to compete with other cars...honda are for pussies...i used to own a rsx type s...and i tell ya its sucks compared to my spec v.i eat si's and type s alive..
yea stupid extra kick... it opens the extra valves in order to feed more air and fuel into the car to produce that kick and i know it opens at 58k idiot..i owned one! try disengaging that vtec selenoid and race a spec v.
lol, i love how khmerboiracer talks like he so high and mighty...just about every car manufacturer has some sort of vtec engine..and its a very smart way to get perfect powerband through all rpm's, but keep talking like u know everything
Sentras have always been ugly so I'm not sure why anyone is so offended by its looks. There isnt nor has there ever been anything about Sentra se-r's that made them stand out from any other sport compact. Styling=always bad, performance=midrange at best, quality=again, not winning any contests and price=never been the cheapest. Bottom line, its just continuing its legacy as the most boring "performance" compact car in existence.
I have the base model 2007 Sentra and love it. There is nothing boring about it, and it can handle even the deadliest back roads. /shrug I have no problem with mine
this is a true thing that happens! its not a chain letter! its kinda scary at first but it really works!! paste this message into 3 comments and press ALT F4 and your crushes name will appear on the screen!!! its soo wierd
i never knew the car had specv, THE NEW SER WITH SPECV
wat a guy, he said the old car ser has 170 torque, i thought it was 155, at the end he says with about a 100 bucks of horsepwer, wat does that mean actually? LOL
old spec v has 180 ft lb of torque, 175 hp. and its $100 per horsepower. The cost of the car. You have never heard that ratio before? Most car mags and reviews tell you the cost per horsepower so you can compare.
why do people keep saying "they should have added a turbo" that would jack up the price. plus you can always do that yourself. As far as the new look I didn't like it at first but its starting to grow on me, needs to be lowered I think.
i have an '03, and all i have to say is the new ones look absolutely stupid. get an 03, put some DC sport heads, custom cat back, and an AEM cold air, and you'll have just over 200hp. And you're car will look cooler.
there should have been a twin turbo on that engine. nissan didnt improve much. they should have like a spec v nismo edition or something. all hooked up to the highest level with a turbo-charged engine. but 02 spec v's looked like a street racer car this looks like a family car now. its ass. nissan fucked it up this time. BIG
I agree the older spec-v is nicer, but twin turbo? Considering the VAST majority of Nissan's sales on the sentra are on the base models, and only a few people are willing to dish out the bit extra for the spec-v, do you really think it'd be worth it for Nissan to put all that money into the development of a Twin Turbo Sentra that'd cost at least $10000 more than the model below it?
i don´t undersatnd people that complain about the new Sentra design. There are uglier cars out there. For example, there we have the VW Corolla (Jetta) GLI. It is ugly as hell!!! ... it seems like a fat woman with a desproportionated ass!!
I thought i was the only one that ever noticed the resembling between the new jetta and the corolla its weird i wonder if they are sharing the same chassis
notice how they don't compare this car to the old spec v. probably because it's the same motor and same piece of crap. nissan should've added a turbo.
eh, as far as the "same motor" goes, it's still a QR25, but it's been revamped completely. so i guess u could call it a QR25 Version 2.0.
but yea, a turbo would've been soooo nice. that finally would've given nissan a car to go against the WRX/SRT-4. not to mention, it would've given it a huge advantage over its main rival the Civic Si.
@nutajoke claiming he has a GTI VR6... you clearly dont own one cause this doesn't exist. and I doubt the sentra would beat either one of em. the new sentra is styled like a subcompact car. its narrow but its sitting high to improve interior room... thats ugly as fuck
CuckooCristo 1 month ago
id rather get a civic si
ironkid5 3 months ago
@ironkid5 Seriously? 130-160hp Civic si vs 200hp spec v. The nissan would blow away an si no problem
CEREALBOX9311 3 months ago
@CEREALBOX9311 civic si has 197hp i belive
elusivej707 1 month ago
@CEREALBOX9311 civic si is 197 horse and 139 lb-ft of torque, but much better handling...0-60 is 6.3 seconds in si, 6.9 in spec-v. clear as day...and new civic is 201 horse and 179 ft-lb of torque (approx for torque cant remember exact. spec v is cheaper though, there is no doubt it is good value for price but it is nothing special
djbutl87 1 month ago
It's amazing. The performance you get out of a minivan chassis. Craziness.
mebemusic 6 months ago
Is this car built on a pickup chassis?
Ge0vone 8 months ago
crap
andrescs86 9 months ago
volks wagons are junk!
Reapers261 11 months ago
volks wagons are junk!
Reapers261 11 months ago
Yellow does not match this car at all.
belizetj 11 months ago
Who divides the cost of the car by the amount of horsepower it has? Most irrelevant information ever. rofl
RC18MT 11 months ago
@RC18MT you're kidding, i hope.
PantstofryPWNZ 11 months ago
same engine as that of 02 altima, same torque but build with different specs to produce a 200hp car. Not bad, but i wouldnt be surprised in the future if you see these cars with head gasket problems as early altima's had.....
Damgoodballers8 1 year ago
@Damgoodballers8 Same engine family, but not the same engine. It did have some problems when it debuted in 07, but they've been fixed.
PantstofryPWNZ 10 months ago
I have this car...the spec v in gray...it is really good fun!! the handling is not great but you can still make it dance...it has enough power for daily commuting and it has enough ground clearance for snow or floods...if you keep it stock for daily driving you can't beat this car. Steering wheel has great feel and feedback, great 6 speeds manual and the engine is bullet proof...the engine loves to rev high all day long!! am saving for the STI :D
insonita55 1 year ago
love the sentra, but I always feel sorry for the engine when it makes that horrible tiny asian engine noise
Tamonduando 1 year ago
save yourself 10 grand over a gti and get this??? I bought a brand new 2008 GTI with DSG transmission for 24,300. It handles many times better and with a 5-600 dollar ECU flash will give the GTI 260hp and 303 ft lbs torque at the crank.
kenr79 2 years ago
I own a 2008 Spec-V and I could tell you that it's the most fun you could get for your money. I owned a 2004 GTI VR6 and a 2006 Audi A4 2.0 all cars with a manual transmission and all at 200hp. The Sentra is faster than the GTI but slower than the Audi. The only disadvantage is that the handling is pretty bad on the SPEC-V....As a car lover I could say that it's still lots of fun to drive.
nutajoke 3 years ago 9
@nutajoke Handing is pretty bad? Me thinks that's driver error.
4G63PWR 10 months ago
@4G63PWR im thinking the same thing man. Japanese car makers usually fine tune suspension to perfection. If he cant drive it then thats his problem. I just bought a used 2008 one and so far I love it. Cant wait to put it to a real test on the track soon
Nequetrefi11 9 months ago
it is great value... but my advice.. work alittle bit harder. spend the extra 4 grand on a GTI. same power but much better handling. the mazda speed 3 torque steers like a pig so it cant put its power as well as the vw. too bad for nissan they were very close at getting it right.. but hey for 21k this is still real good value.
edersiomoran 3 years ago
Anybody who says the MS3 torque steers has never driven an MS3. It has a DSC control system to limit power in 1st and 2nd gear if wheel spin is detected. Practically eliminates torque steer all together. I'll agree thiugh a FWD car would not be my first choice for a performance oriented car seeing as I drive RX-7's but an MS3 is top on my list for fun DD
83FB7 3 years ago
that's fact hondas don't have any torque the only reason the si civic has 197 hp is because its high redline so the only one that ignorant is you
derk702 3 years ago
If I'm gonna spend $22K on a "performance" FWD car, I'm gonna buy a Mazdaspeed 3. 263hp and 280lbs/ft of torque for $22k. It would run circles around that bananna and look better doing it
83FB7 3 years ago
wow, your stupid cause the mazdaspeed3 is NOT 22K
hondahp18 3 years ago
Wow you're a stupid Honda fanbois who doesn't know how to read or research. The Speed 3 starts at $23,410 before incentives and bargaining. I've seen people drive them off the lot for $21k. Grow up, VTAK isn't god
83FB7 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no such thing as a performance fwd car haha
wideopen704 3 years ago
ya really haha, ff cars have a horrible disavantage compared to 4wd and rwd.
gixxer450 3 years ago
What about the Ford Focus RS? That is faster than a Mustang.
AdrianC12345 1 year ago
and one year after your MS3 would broke down!!! end of ur happiness!!!
charjohnnie 3 years ago
Broke down? Sorry, I know how to take car of my vehicles where they don't break down. I'd like to think I'm mrchanically incline seeing as how I took a complete car, yanked the motor, radiator, and oil cooler out, changed oil pans, had it swapped into another car, wired and running in less than 12 hours. Plus warranties kick ass
83FB7 3 years ago
crap ! mustang rule
carcajouxx 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cant we just all agree that honda is crap. i mean fuck vtech check the torque they push like a buck ten.
derk702 3 years ago
This must be the best bang for the buck under $20k. No other car can run 0-60 in 6.5 sec for under 20k.
riceburner02 3 years ago
honda rules!!! vtec is not an extra thing they need to compete; it is the power itself.
soulalba 3 years ago
All companies use a similar version of vtec, others just make it less pronounced.
Honda's DOHC VTEC system uses a slight dip right before crossover to make the switch to the high cam more dramatic. Look at any DOHC stock dyno you will see it.
Which is why once you tune it, that dip goes away and the kick vtec usually gives goes away but the car is quite a bit faster even if it doesn't feel it.
Godofelru 3 years ago
He's KIDDING. My SER-V does 0-60 in 5.97. Cops don't see me, 85MPH all day.
7.2 sec 0-60? HAH! LOWBALLED to fool countries where they TAX HP & "can't handle the truth" Car MUST make 235HP moving 2997 lbs. that fast. 5.97 thru 2nd gear, just drive it like you stole it.
15000 miles old expect 37 MPG in 6th at 55-60 (high test) 33.7 MPG (regular) 28-29.5 around town. 0-20W oil, Fram filter, tires 44 pounds all way round.
Lateral G's? .97-1.02.
Nissan's best kept pocket-rocket secret.
Yourdeadmeat69 3 years ago
ma friend got one and i drove it aint that bad ittz a fun car 2 drive they made to b a civic si killer my friend has one one too id take sn si plus itz faster
Steadyasshegoes24 4 years ago
i would get this for 20k thats freaken good
put a nice exhuast and im good
lilstathaki 4 years ago
the car performs yes.. but it just doesnt look as good as it used too...the first gen SER looked the best by far.....
mean98neon 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
20-22 grand? LOL! .. GTI? is this dude high? GTI would smoke this shit. I dont even like american "Muscle" but a mustang would smoke this and probally ten times the amount of stability and comfort. Not worth it. 2009 Nissan GT-R .. different story/
dnlgao 4 years ago
Why would you compare a 300 HP 4.6L V8 muscle car to a 200 HP 2.5L 4 Cyl. tuner? Thats like comparing apples and oranges. Are you some pissed off GTI owner or something?
ianpolage 4 years ago 18
Hes referring to the Volkswagen GTI.
amjwh99 3 years ago
Lose the helmet.
reylandcossie 4 years ago
what an idiot this guy, he cant decide what the specs really are
arashn89 4 years ago
Poolios
lesmcluffalot 4 years ago
boring vid
lol305 4 years ago
I'll buy this for $15K.
jeff2417 4 years ago
The hp only went up by 25 My 2003 has 175 for the spec-v, 165 for the regular ser. I think the 2003 was better looking. but thats just my taste.
esox66 4 years ago
nice review of reliable cars.
eraserheads78 4 years ago
i miss the old school se-r.. early 90's model with the SR20 engine.. soo much potential with those cars.. miss them alot..
importlove 4 years ago
07 Spec-V = Gay Sex
Pj311foo 4 years ago 2
Nissan way better than Honda. Who cares about Civic Si?
NissanShift 4 years ago
ya, not to mention the torque is way better on the Nissan, but still not as impressive as V-Dub's GTI with 207 lbs' of torque!
smitman556678 4 years ago
GTI MKV has a turbo thats why
Coixxman 3 years ago
ive driven both a nissan and a honda... i must say the honda's engine is more reliable, and it just sounds better
with the nissan, the engine sounds like its gonna break apart, its more rough compared to the honda's... hondas are high pitched, and they just sound beautiful lol
carcrazy1234 4 years ago
agree with ya 100% man :)
swtendo 4 years ago
your kidding..honda got vtec.thats the sound you hear over 5k rpm..it needs that extra kick just to compete with other cars...honda are for pussies...i used to own a rsx type s...and i tell ya its sucks compared to my spec v.i eat si's and type s alive..
khmerboiracer 3 years ago
u eat Si's and type S's ?
u never had an rsx type s....u dont even know what ur talking abt
vtec engages at 5800 rpms ... it needs extra kick ? dohc ring a bell ?
nayil100 3 years ago
yea stupid extra kick... it opens the extra valves in order to feed more air and fuel into the car to produce that kick and i know it opens at 58k idiot..i owned one! try disengaging that vtec selenoid and race a spec v.
khmerboiracer 3 years ago
why race with single cam ?
u from mars or something ?
ooooh 58k idiot ? u mean 5.8k idiot
nayil100 3 years ago
haha! Im with navil100 on this one.
Khmerboiracer. You dont really know what your talking about. Vtec engines are one of the best in the world for a reason!
mojojojo911 3 years ago 2
lol, i love how khmerboiracer talks like he so high and mighty...just about every car manufacturer has some sort of vtec engine..and its a very smart way to get perfect powerband through all rpm's, but keep talking like u know everything
dig543 3 years ago
Everyone.
jeff2417 4 years ago
never really thought that a sentra could be faster then a civic si
chop9suey 4 years ago
why would you want understeer, in a FWD?
BallBearingTurboFC3S 4 years ago
exactly what i thought
flectz 4 years ago
looks like a baby altima. i like the generation spec v before this one much better in the looks deptartment
crampd 4 years ago
Sentras have always been ugly so I'm not sure why anyone is so offended by its looks. There isnt nor has there ever been anything about Sentra se-r's that made them stand out from any other sport compact. Styling=always bad, performance=midrange at best, quality=again, not winning any contests and price=never been the cheapest. Bottom line, its just continuing its legacy as the most boring "performance" compact car in existence.
ryanandrewmartin 4 years ago
I have the base model 2007 Sentra and love it. There is nothing boring about it, and it can handle even the deadliest back roads. /shrug I have no problem with mine
Dsty2001 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is a true thing that happens! its not a chain letter! its kinda scary at first but it really works!! paste this message into 3 comments and press ALT F4 and your crushes name will appear on the screen!!! its soo wierd
NickyTballer 4 years ago
i never knew the car had specv, THE NEW SER WITH SPECV
wat a guy, he said the old car ser has 170 torque, i thought it was 155, at the end he says with about a 100 bucks of horsepwer, wat does that mean actually? LOL
sebbienooch 4 years ago
old spec v has 180 ft lb of torque, 175 hp. and its $100 per horsepower. The cost of the car. You have never heard that ratio before? Most car mags and reviews tell you the cost per horsepower so you can compare.
vastdesign 4 years ago
$100/per horse power
mxl360 4 years ago
why do people keep saying "they should have added a turbo" that would jack up the price. plus you can always do that yourself. As far as the new look I didn't like it at first but its starting to grow on me, needs to be lowered I think.
teckniec2 4 years ago
I also don't like what they did to the Maxima either. The only one that I like better than the previous generation is the Altima.
timschatz 4 years ago
hahaha that thing looks like a flying brick
oliverxlicious 4 years ago
i have an '03, and all i have to say is the new ones look absolutely stupid. get an 03, put some DC sport heads, custom cat back, and an AEM cold air, and you'll have just over 200hp. And you're car will look cooler.
timschatz 4 years ago
Agreed. And could they have made the new one look anymore like a damn Prius?!
Pj311foo 4 years ago
i owne a 02 ser =p, the new ser's are gay only 20hp difference from 02, the 02 ser had the skyline grill
Kurosaki 4 years ago
save ten grand over a gti????? gti is only 22 grand. same price.
patailes 4 years ago
GTI price as tested in Road and Track comparison test was 30k. GTI starts at 22k, probably doesnt come with a steering wheel.
vastdesign 4 years ago
Ugly Car
sleepy6130 4 years ago
there should have been a twin turbo on that engine. nissan didnt improve much. they should have like a spec v nismo edition or something. all hooked up to the highest level with a turbo-charged engine. but 02 spec v's looked like a street racer car this looks like a family car now. its ass. nissan fucked it up this time. BIG
abiniz 4 years ago
I agree the older spec-v is nicer, but twin turbo? Considering the VAST majority of Nissan's sales on the sentra are on the base models, and only a few people are willing to dish out the bit extra for the spec-v, do you really think it'd be worth it for Nissan to put all that money into the development of a Twin Turbo Sentra that'd cost at least $10000 more than the model below it?
ChesterField17 4 years ago
And what do you mean they didn't improve it much? How many manufactures improve a model by 100+ hp from one year to the next? Think about it....
ChesterField17 4 years ago
i don´t undersatnd people that complain about the new Sentra design. There are uglier cars out there. For example, there we have the VW Corolla (Jetta) GLI. It is ugly as hell!!! ... it seems like a fat woman with a desproportionated ass!!
untoteneternauta 4 years ago
I thought i was the only one that ever noticed the resembling between the new jetta and the corolla its weird i wonder if they are sharing the same chassis
killbill3d 4 years ago
Not a bad car for the price, quality video as well we need more videos like this out there!
namejko 4 years ago
that's really cool, the SE-R has gotten faster but I think the older model looked better
sirsentrasera333 4 years ago
notice how they don't compare this car to the old spec v. probably because it's the same motor and same piece of crap. nissan should've added a turbo.
revil86 4 years ago
at least it look a little better than the older POS sentra.
texashardrocker0 4 years ago
nah, the 02-03 spec v looks hella better
revil86 4 years ago
eh, as far as the "same motor" goes, it's still a QR25, but it's been revamped completely. so i guess u could call it a QR25 Version 2.0.
but yea, a turbo would've been soooo nice. that finally would've given nissan a car to go against the WRX/SRT-4. not to mention, it would've given it a huge advantage over its main rival the Civic Si.
bewdx3 4 years ago
nice thanks for the video
cantstand2lose 4 years ago