Added: 1 year ago
From: EcoLogicFoam
Views: 575
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The resultant R value of 2" of 2 lb foam is R12. The resultant R value of the installation done here is R22. The cost is higher than installing 2" of 2 lb, however it is significantly lower than the cost to install R22 in 2 lb foam. Different applications require different approaches and this is a cost effective, high R value solution some homeowners find very attractive.

  • so you're saying that they difference b/w 2" and 3" of foam is more than the material cost of roxul, and the labor to install? seems off to me....

  • The use of Roxol allows us to achieve the best of both worlds - the client is provided with the benifits of foam (High R value, low air and vapor permeance qualities) at a lower cost than a straight 3 inches of foam. Because foam is a far more expensive product than fiberous materials, we get the benifits of using foam without incurring the cost of a pure foam application.

  • why bother with the roxul? if you're spraying 2" for a VB it'd be cheaper to just spray 3" of foam.....?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more