It looks like a reflection to me.... and the way it gets pixelated is an indication (for me) it is not a real object in the sky-A hologram or a more accurate description projection as a movie is projected onto a screen . I often have noticed the sun or moon seems to have a glass or something behind it. Sometimes I have seen family type scenes reflected in it....
@ubuibme24 hmmm my guess the pixelation cloaks the satellite from us seeing it's hardware because they are trying to pass them off as stars. But when trying to bring it into focus like at 1:05 their seems to be hardware hidden within the light. Perhaps the hardware behind it to the right emits something that blocks our full view. Glass or a hazy gasified field?
1. An antenna configuration comprising: a lens having an first surface n a second surface,said second surface having a spherical shape n a pluralityof feed horns having a plurality of diameters
2. An antenna configuration as recited in claim 1 wherein said first diameter is greater than the second diameter by about between 56% n about 60%
In this example,lens 32 has a diameter of 16 inches n a focal length of 48 inches FIG. 13, a layout of an antenna configuration 68 using three lenses 32
cont'd Patent 6323815 Each of the plurality of feed horns generates a beam that has a phase distribution The phase distributions have a predetermined phase relationship with the first surface and preferably the second surface This allows the lens to transmit n receive a signal with desired phase distribution across a cross-section of the beam The beams from the plurality of lenses are inter-leaved on the ground to form a contiguous coverage with multiple overlapping spot-beams.
Patent 6323815 An antenna configuration suitable for LEO satellites includes a plurality of lenses whereby each lens has a plurality of feed horns positioned with respect to the lens The lens has a first surface n a second surface The plurality of feed horns is disposed upon a curved surface
In this example lens 32 has a diameter of 16 inches n a focal length of 48 inches
Referring now to FIG. 13, a layout of an antenna configuration 68 using 3 lenses 32 Multiples 3 lens combos on LEO's
@cjkonecnik That's actually not true, most communications satellites are in geostationary orbit, so they don't move in relation to your reference point on earth. LEO (low-earth orbit) satellite move very quickly across the sky. Now, where dboots is stupid is the fact that you will not see a satellite in space unless you use a telescope because the vast majority of satellites are fairly small. This just looks like a star.
@jacklegg21 DARPA boasted in a 2003 budget subcommittee report that they been able to advance science n technology in a 20 year window what normally would of taken them 100yrs
Telescope? LEO's move quickly? Don't mislead the good folks LEO's take about 90 minutes as they r about 100 mi above INSIDE EARTH'S atmosphere Vast majority of future satellites r meant to orbit well under 30 mi per DARPA's thrust areas Stars don't have hardware caught orbitting to the right of them either
@dbootsthediva So, let me get this straight. you can see an object that is roughly 6 ft x 6ft x 7ft at a distance of 100-1,240 miles away without a telescope? Can you also see the International Space Station or random pieces of space junk? If so, then I'm convinced that you yourself are a DARPA project that gives people bionic eyes. And LEOs do move quickly as opposed to MEOs and GEOs. For the record, it's orbiting, not orbitting.
@jacklegg21 Oh quit shillegg The good folks have enough common sense to remember standing on a very high story building or mountain n seeing the night lights in the distance, IF HIGH ENOUGH Since LEO"S are chocked full of multiples of small 3 beam forming lenses antennas across them, it blends into looking like a giant light bulb in the sky when we zoom in FOR THE RECORD, they've been advanced the technology n capable of ORBITING a lot lower than a mere 100 mi (Fast6,ISIS,etc)
@dbootsthediva If the orbit is less than 100 miles above the earth it is no longer considered a LEO. At 30 miles away I doubt you would see an object the equivalent size of a large pickup truck, even if you're zooming in with a camera. Plus you're bringing up ISIS satellites...a program that ended in the 70s. Might as well bring up project West Ford and claim that was a government conspiracy. The government does a lot of crooked shit, but I think your imagiantion is getting the better of you
DARPA tech 2005 Presentation Near-space is about 20-100 kilometers, (for the shills who are metric challenged) its about 65,000 to 325,000 feet Imagine a geostationary satellite parked 21 kilometers ( 7 miles) above the targeted area In the last year, SPO's ISIS program began leveraging the characteristics of near-space to achieve persistent wide area surveillance of air and ground targets Guess your imagination got you no where as ISIS is alive n kicking shill
@MrWilliamSandoval LOL Since when does a Natural Star have an orb like autonomous device aligned to the right of them as seen in this video?? Hmmm guess that is why Satellite is in video's title and not STAR But at least you discovered stickers
dbootsthediva, wow since discovering you in the beginning, veiwing your vids, then joining your channel and now viewing those vids you comment on. Well girl, you are no wasted little skittle gal. nope.. . from your grace of love and devotion to your dear mother. your ability to see the signs. your courage to live the truth as well as your intellect I thank you.
@YouKnowItAllTrustMe I have posted my perspective I think it is some form of self assembling material that comes out of the chemicals of the chemttrails myself the entities you speak of But aht is just my opinion See INTERNATIONAL PATENT WO/2008/076414 Invention provides micron n sub-micron scale particles designed to recognize n selectively interact with each other by exploiting the recognition specificity enabled by DNA-sequence-encoded coatings.
I hear you Take a look at the space based weaponary systems of types of Directed Energy Weapons definitions of the original text of HR 2977 They seem to be moving towards a future of blasting/zapping a targeted population without the need of bullets anymore He who has the most toys wins LOL
Since you have enable friend block I could not message you some necessary comments. However they are posted at my video: (#751 L&M-YAP-L123) AERO HEAD MOVING Reference videos #704 & 706
@wadelick You don't know about sun sychronized and moon sychronized satellites that trail the moon and sun?? Sorry but, where I ive in No Calif there are absolutely no "what is known as a star
that has capacity to appear SO EVIDENTLY LOW ON THE HORIZON Maybe u experience VERY VERY LOW seemingly low star(s) in the area u live, but where I live they r known as SATELLITES N SATELLITE CONSTELLATIONS (See Iridium) Seek the truth for yourself Don't let your friends put words in your mouth
@goddeh69 There is enough information in the video for u to figure it out, on your own, if u had an inkling to take the time Your channel pg doesn't indicate u take much time to seek answers on your own other than what it shows of birthday blowjobs n playstation games? since 2006 of only 3 favorites tht peaked your interest Instead u choose an agenda inferring spouting nonsense I would assume perhaps it's because I don't have the same tastes in videos that u do
*****Looks like one of those night stars - see my videos titled Aero Star. However how low is this image. Aero Star are very low in altitude and can be zoomed in to see faces inside.
@aerostockians No comment concerning the equipment seen to the right normally hidden from view that emerged of that gray orb that stayed PERFECTLY aligned with the object you call "nite star" I find it strange that you didn't take the time to comment on that because that is quite a hidden piece of hardware that appeared to be a piece of the fake star satellite's equipment
@dbootsthediva The Night Star has those colorful snake light aliens accompanying them. I've taken several photos of the night stars and the snake shaped objects appear in each case - I think I mentioned that in one of my several night star videos. I suggest that whenever you video these objects that you also snap a photo because the still image often reveals things present that the moving images cant focus on. Example in aero videos use you Pause Control to see things present.
@aero I have noticed same about snaking light n fake stars When I add slo mo to it, the snaking light takes geometrical shapes of some form of a pulsed beam energy ( I assume) I am in the habit of clicking on a video to Pause it as well as using a magnifying glass to see if there is more than what meets the eye of what's present I use to try with stills, but it seems the photo part seems to leave out what a video exposes I don't understand why but that's what I have experienced
@aerostockians@aerostockians Night Star???? Video shows zoomed in, the Satellite object had some form of design pattern inside of it Perhaps it's designed on purpose to emit illusion of facial Generally I see binocular like figure 8's forms or side views similiar to quarter moons like faces Nowadays most of mankinds techniques of power sources r designed to emit triangle 0 shape patterns There power sources r gas chemical based Bubbles tend to merge circle or half circles shapes
@dbootsthediva In the case of the aero night star - what you see is what you get - there are no illusions - the star is filled with aliens because the night star is an orb - one of the high level bosses
@aerostockians Sorry to my eyes it is some form of a satellite n the orb to the right of it is some form of hardware or magnetic device perhaps that help keeps the SAT's aligned in there satellite constellations with the short burst of pulses they use in which to transmit n receive Have u ever been to such a star filled with aliens or to a night star of a orb ???? The orb could be an atmosphere sensor of a super computer that is capable of complex tasks (a high level learning computer)
@z1zaz Sorry what red star (planet) are you referring to? Can you tell me where to pause video to see this red star (planet) you speak of that is looking large due to relative orbits?? Thanks
You mentioned red star is in this video yet you can't point out a specific spot in this video in which to guide me to show me what you are referring to in THIS VIDEO i can't try the website you are indicating until you point out what you are referring to of red star in this video But thanks for trying
I'm in!
Dakers11 4 months ago in playlist More videos from dbootsthediva
@Dakers11 Huh???
dbootsthediva 4 months ago
It looks like a reflection to me.... and the way it gets pixelated is an indication (for me) it is not a real object in the sky-A hologram or a more accurate description projection as a movie is projected onto a screen . I often have noticed the sun or moon seems to have a glass or something behind it. Sometimes I have seen family type scenes reflected in it....
watch?v=DqInEMi3DX0
ubuibme24 6 months ago
@ubuibme24 hmmm my guess the pixelation cloaks the satellite from us seeing it's hardware because they are trying to pass them off as stars. But when trying to bring it into focus like at 1:05 their seems to be hardware hidden within the light. Perhaps the hardware behind it to the right emits something that blocks our full view. Glass or a hazy gasified field?
dbootsthediva 6 months ago
Amazing!! THank you my dear!!
BlueAquaMarina 1 year ago
1. An antenna configuration comprising: a lens having an first surface n a second surface,said second surface having a spherical shape n a pluralityof feed horns having a plurality of diameters
2. An antenna configuration as recited in claim 1 wherein said first diameter is greater than the second diameter by about between 56% n about 60%
In this example,lens 32 has a diameter of 16 inches n a focal length of 48 inches FIG. 13, a layout of an antenna configuration 68 using three lenses 32
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
cont'd Patent 6323815 Each of the plurality of feed horns generates a beam that has a phase distribution The phase distributions have a predetermined phase relationship with the first surface and preferably the second surface This allows the lens to transmit n receive a signal with desired phase distribution across a cross-section of the beam The beams from the plurality of lenses are inter-leaved on the ground to form a contiguous coverage with multiple overlapping spot-beams.
Holigram?
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
Patent 6323815 An antenna configuration suitable for LEO satellites includes a plurality of lenses whereby each lens has a plurality of feed horns positioned with respect to the lens The lens has a first surface n a second surface The plurality of feed horns is disposed upon a curved surface
In this example lens 32 has a diameter of 16 inches n a focal length of 48 inches
Referring now to FIG. 13, a layout of an antenna configuration 68 using 3 lenses 32 Multiples 3 lens combos on LEO's
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
twinkle twinkle little star
jezzr101 1 year ago
@jezzr101 twinkle twinkle little stars should not become like light bulbs when we zoom in
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
wow creepy!
BaB3B001 1 year ago 2
uh plane? *facepalm*
therebombs 1 year ago
Great song.
JVIPER88 1 year ago
Oh, that? That's just our Orbital Pacification Cannon, built for citizens who ask too many question, such as yourself.
Please stand still.
BLARGHALT 1 year ago 3
Do do realize that if it was a satellite of anything (the Earth, the Moon, anything) it would be moving? Not simply hovering in one place!
cjkonecnik 1 year ago
@cjkonecnik It was moving slowly until it couldn't be seen anymore on the horizon
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
@cjkonecnik That's actually not true, most communications satellites are in geostationary orbit, so they don't move in relation to your reference point on earth. LEO (low-earth orbit) satellite move very quickly across the sky. Now, where dboots is stupid is the fact that you will not see a satellite in space unless you use a telescope because the vast majority of satellites are fairly small. This just looks like a star.
jacklegg21 1 year ago
@jacklegg21 DARPA boasted in a 2003 budget subcommittee report that they been able to advance science n technology in a 20 year window what normally would of taken them 100yrs
Telescope? LEO's move quickly? Don't mislead the good folks LEO's take about 90 minutes as they r about 100 mi above INSIDE EARTH'S atmosphere Vast majority of future satellites r meant to orbit well under 30 mi per DARPA's thrust areas Stars don't have hardware caught orbitting to the right of them either
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
@dbootsthediva So, let me get this straight. you can see an object that is roughly 6 ft x 6ft x 7ft at a distance of 100-1,240 miles away without a telescope? Can you also see the International Space Station or random pieces of space junk? If so, then I'm convinced that you yourself are a DARPA project that gives people bionic eyes. And LEOs do move quickly as opposed to MEOs and GEOs. For the record, it's orbiting, not orbitting.
jacklegg21 1 year ago
@jacklegg21 Oh quit shillegg The good folks have enough common sense to remember standing on a very high story building or mountain n seeing the night lights in the distance, IF HIGH ENOUGH Since LEO"S are chocked full of multiples of small 3 beam forming lenses antennas across them, it blends into looking like a giant light bulb in the sky when we zoom in FOR THE RECORD, they've been advanced the technology n capable of ORBITING a lot lower than a mere 100 mi (Fast6,ISIS,etc)
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
@dbootsthediva If the orbit is less than 100 miles above the earth it is no longer considered a LEO. At 30 miles away I doubt you would see an object the equivalent size of a large pickup truck, even if you're zooming in with a camera. Plus you're bringing up ISIS satellites...a program that ended in the 70s. Might as well bring up project West Ford and claim that was a government conspiracy. The government does a lot of crooked shit, but I think your imagiantion is getting the better of you
jacklegg21 1 year ago
@jacklegg21
DARPA tech 2005 Presentation Near-space is about 20-100 kilometers, (for the shills who are metric challenged) its about 65,000 to 325,000 feet Imagine a geostationary satellite parked 21 kilometers ( 7 miles) above the targeted area In the last year, SPO's ISIS program began leveraging the characteristics of near-space to achieve persistent wide area surveillance of air and ground targets Guess your imagination got you no where as ISIS is alive n kicking shill
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
you have discovered a star!!!! You get a sticker!!!!
MrWilliamSandoval 1 year ago
@MrWilliamSandoval LOL Since when does a Natural Star have an orb like autonomous device aligned to the right of them as seen in this video?? Hmmm guess that is why Satellite is in video's title and not STAR But at least you discovered stickers
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
dbootsthediva, wow since discovering you in the beginning, veiwing your vids, then joining your channel and now viewing those vids you comment on. Well girl, you are no wasted little skittle gal. nope.. . from your grace of love and devotion to your dear mother. your ability to see the signs. your courage to live the truth as well as your intellect I thank you.
shesjupiter 1 year ago
@shesjupiter Their will always be more than what meets the eye ALWAYS We just have to have the courage to look behind the Wizard's curtain
Thank you Peace n health to those you love
dbootsthediva 1 year ago 2
watch?v=GqetF-7J7oI
EDITED VERSION.....WHAT IS YOUR OPINION? WILL REMOVE ONCE I LEARN YOUR PERSPECTIVE....................
YouKnowItAllTrustMe 1 year ago
@YouKnowItAllTrustMe I have posted my perspective I think it is some form of self assembling material that comes out of the chemicals of the chemttrails myself the entities you speak of But aht is just my opinion See INTERNATIONAL PATENT WO/2008/076414 Invention provides micron n sub-micron scale particles designed to recognize n selectively interact with each other by exploiting the recognition specificity enabled by DNA-sequence-encoded coatings.
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
Actually you are the first to try and mislead others that this is MARS so low on the horizon LOL
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
you will all either stop arguing over what it is, and take care of the people letting it go on...
or you'll all perpetuate our demise via murder/suicide machines...whatever.
our chance is almost done with.
i don't even feel good about being right, but you all argue amongst yourselves, when we all know what should be done, around the world.
5/5
zero1gmv 2 years ago
Amen
you are right, we are losing ground about our chances in trying to stop the satellite terrorism invading all our of countries
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
lol, its frequency wars alright.
what a waste of time...
same with driving cars.
i mean, why not just put guns to our heads now, and save the trouble and the time...lol.
zero1gmv 2 years ago
I hear you Take a look at the space based weaponary systems of types of Directed Energy Weapons definitions of the original text of HR 2977 They seem to be moving towards a future of blasting/zapping a targeted population without the need of bullets anymore He who has the most toys wins LOL
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
Since you have enable friend block I could not message you some necessary comments. However they are posted at my video: (#751 L&M-YAP-L123) AERO HEAD MOVING Reference videos #704 & 706
aerostockians 2 years ago
Comment removed
z1zaz 2 years ago
WHAT IS THE GOVERNMENT DOING???
icebloomafoo 2 years ago
@icebloomafoo whatever the heck they want with total disregard for how it might harm our planet or the population
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
thats what is known as a star
wadelick 2 years ago
@wadelick You don't know about sun sychronized and moon sychronized satellites that trail the moon and sun?? Sorry but, where I ive in No Calif there are absolutely no "what is known as a star
that has capacity to appear SO EVIDENTLY LOW ON THE HORIZON Maybe u experience VERY VERY LOW seemingly low star(s) in the area u live, but where I live they r known as SATELLITES N SATELLITE CONSTELLATIONS (See Iridium) Seek the truth for yourself Don't let your friends put words in your mouth
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
try taking some measurements and rule out what it isn't before spouting nonsense
goddeh69 2 years ago
@goddeh69 There is enough information in the video for u to figure it out, on your own, if u had an inkling to take the time Your channel pg doesn't indicate u take much time to seek answers on your own other than what it shows of birthday blowjobs n playstation games? since 2006 of only 3 favorites tht peaked your interest Instead u choose an agenda inferring spouting nonsense I would assume perhaps it's because I don't have the same tastes in videos that u do
Sorry games not my forte
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
*****Looks like one of those night stars - see my videos titled Aero Star. However how low is this image. Aero Star are very low in altitude and can be zoomed in to see faces inside.
aerostockians 2 years ago
@aerostockians No comment concerning the equipment seen to the right normally hidden from view that emerged of that gray orb that stayed PERFECTLY aligned with the object you call "nite star" I find it strange that you didn't take the time to comment on that because that is quite a hidden piece of hardware that appeared to be a piece of the fake star satellite's equipment
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
@dbootsthediva The Night Star has those colorful snake light aliens accompanying them. I've taken several photos of the night stars and the snake shaped objects appear in each case - I think I mentioned that in one of my several night star videos. I suggest that whenever you video these objects that you also snap a photo because the still image often reveals things present that the moving images cant focus on. Example in aero videos use you Pause Control to see things present.
aerostockians 2 years ago
@aero I have noticed same about snaking light n fake stars When I add slo mo to it, the snaking light takes geometrical shapes of some form of a pulsed beam energy ( I assume) I am in the habit of clicking on a video to Pause it as well as using a magnifying glass to see if there is more than what meets the eye of what's present I use to try with stills, but it seems the photo part seems to leave out what a video exposes I don't understand why but that's what I have experienced
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
@aerostockians @aerostockians Night Star???? Video shows zoomed in, the Satellite object had some form of design pattern inside of it Perhaps it's designed on purpose to emit illusion of facial Generally I see binocular like figure 8's forms or side views similiar to quarter moons like faces Nowadays most of mankinds techniques of power sources r designed to emit triangle 0 shape patterns There power sources r gas chemical based Bubbles tend to merge circle or half circles shapes
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
@dbootsthediva In the case of the aero night star - what you see is what you get - there are no illusions - the star is filled with aliens because the night star is an orb - one of the high level bosses
aerostockians 2 years ago
@aerostockians Sorry to my eyes it is some form of a satellite n the orb to the right of it is some form of hardware or magnetic device perhaps that help keeps the SAT's aligned in there satellite constellations with the short burst of pulses they use in which to transmit n receive Have u ever been to such a star filled with aliens or to a night star of a orb ???? The orb could be an atmosphere sensor of a super computer that is capable of complex tasks (a high level learning computer)
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
Hi D,
The red planet is clearly visible up there at the moment.
Also looking large due to relative orbits.
z1zaz 2 years ago 5
@z1zaz Sorry what red star (planet) are you referring to? Can you tell me where to pause video to see this red star (planet) you speak of that is looking large due to relative orbits?? Thanks
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
you could try website - nightskyinfo
z1zaz 2 years ago
@z1zaz Why should I need to try that
You mentioned red star is in this video yet you can't point out a specific spot in this video in which to guide me to show me what you are referring to in THIS VIDEO i can't try the website you are indicating until you point out what you are referring to of red star in this video But thanks for trying
dbootsthediva 2 years ago