Added: 2 years ago
From: FleetwoodFactor
Views: 38,613
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (906)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Democrats are happy with all the clowns in the GOP clown car and there always from for more. Palin has better legs then Romney and better tits then Newt, and look better in a dress then either Rick (wink wink).

    Vote Quitter 2012

  • LOL @ HALO for doing google research. Read a book old man. See the link I supplied which actually gets into some books. Imagine that. HALO doesn't read books, that's obvious.

  • @UTubekookdetector Okay Kook, you want to conveniently ignore a unbiased resource that proves you wrong, we'll move on to actual books then. Anybody interested in seeing how dumb Utubekookdetector is you can go read The Great Depression: American 1929-1931 by Robert S McElevaine. Need more citations? Funny how I ddin't need a vague link to cite that...

  • @UTubekookdetector Running your mouth at that MegaJohns channel, huh? If you had an integrity you'd admit you were wrong about the Great Depression and stop using deflections like Laissez faire blah blah blah. I don't remember saying health care was laissez, I suppose it is though given those immoral bastards get away with murder. Btw, if you are looking for a debate I accept. I won't curse or nothing, even when you make snide remarks that are worse. You won't debate me though, too scared

  • The autistic HALO is a bit "butthurt" over my refuting of her comments. She's still at it. Those who are interested can see my vid at watch?v=pzfFnz5_1YY and the link underneath for a refutation of HALO's nonsense about the Great Depression. HALO already tried the "Hoover froze spending" argument, which is also false.

  • @UTubekookdetector Anyone who is interested can simply google black thursday and the great depression and see that Utubekookdetector is an obnoxious troll who thinks it's okay for him to revise history and bend facts as long as he doesn't use cuss words. Notice how I'm not stearing you towards my channel filled with bias which is precisely what Kook is doing. Why? Because he's hoping you are as dumb as he is.

  • During 18th century Frances reign of terror the news men and intellectuals of that day accused Martie Antoinette of having sex with her young son backing it up with couched testimony by said son whom they took from his mother early in the game.

    The modern version of the ‘mob’ has recycled the old French “revolution” the slanders are much the same, invented and salacious.

    Slander and unfounded innuendo are the tools of weak minds.

  • @alwanderer by the way of 44,032 votes cast so far in a NRO Poll: "Who is the better conservative standard-bearer?".Palin or Perry ?? 26 percent Perry 76 percent Palin. Not quite the same as who would be the best candidate to run, but reflects conservative value ??? Yes yes yes.

  • Does anyone think in earnest that "your vote" matters? For those of you who say it does, you're I think you're insane, because you keep electing individuals into office who do nothing to truly make this country better. I find myself watching old 80's shows and wondering what the hell is going on today with society. When I was much younger, I was dismissal of my parents when they would talk about how things were "getting bad". Now I sound like them to the youth. Your children will do the same.

  • @IdeasOfInfluence Oh the irony.

  • They would sweep into power. Sarah's my gal.

  • Man, two stupid creationist trying to shove their right wing christian agenda down the thoghts of freethinkers and ratinalists like my self. Can you say religious dictatorship!!

  • @pbrskater26 You're a free thinker? Really?

  • @zamusicza

    Damn streight! I think, which means i'm dangerus...to creationists and right wingers who support old world theology like creationism!

  • @pbrskater26 So you're a threat to anyone who doesn't agree with you. Yeah that just screams free thinker.

  • @zamusicza

    So to you a freethinker is letting a invisible dude in the sky think for you?

  • @pbrskater26 So when did I say that? Could you point to any of my comments that would lead you to believe that? Putting words in someone's mouth. Free thinker indeed.

  • @zamusicza

    I was not saying that you said that. I was saying that because thats what some people think. I'm an athiest because people like Pat Robertson, Kirk Camoran, Ray Comfort say the only way to be a true christian is to give up free thought, autonomy and reject ratinal scientific understanding.

  • I don't know any Democrat who DOESN'T want Sarah & Michele to run.

  • @stfdbitch Have you ever heard the term "never saw it coming"? Only this time it will be a pack of pissed-off mama grizzlies! Palin/Bachmann 2012!

  • @stfdbitch ... Oh I think the Democrats would like it better if they ran and won. That would be the end of the Republican Party.

  • @stfdbitch I agree 100%.

  • I think the imbecile who made this missed the point of the song. The lyric goes "meet the new boss.....SAME as the old boss." Meaning lets not elect another illiterate butterbean schmuck that doesn't know their asshole from their earhole. Whoever put this song on here probably thinks that "Born in the USA" is a pro war song. No I don't think we're going to get fooled again.

  • LOVE IT!

  • Obama is an Asss, the Democrats and Republicans are both garbage and politicians on both sides of the crooked fence are crooks. I have no horse in this race but the moron who put this video together is so clueless that it is beyond sad.

    ....

    You pathetic moron, don't you realize that Palin and Bachmann are Dumber and Dumber, I can't decide who is the crazier, dumber bimbo.

    ....

    Yep, 100% guarantee for Obama winning is this pathetic, silly ticket.

  • Palin-Bachmann = Democrats' wet dream.

    It shows how clueless Republicans are that they don't realize that. It would make Obama's re-election a cakewalk--a real one, not like the fake "mission accomplished" in Iraq.

    One more thing: no matter how much I hate the Democrats (and I do), the Republicans always manage to be much more obnoxious. So I vote for neither. This country becomes more decadent everyday.

  • lol horrible job editing out 'same as the old boss'

  • Its going to be tough to stop this ticket,,,,

  • lol. Not going to happen. too much sexism. funny though

    even though palin and bachman would botch foreign policy to the point of no return.

  • Bachmann annoys me she kind of ripped Palin off, Bachmann isn't even in the polls, Ron Paul is above her. Palin is still like a 10 and she isn't even really doing anything. Meanwhile Bachmann is killing her self everyday, you get phone calls all the time from her asking for money, not one from Palin.

  • it is the original DUMB AND DUMBER.. Pain and Bachman

  • Lets all be smart and vote Dr. Ron Paul. Be American and Patriotic my friends and please vote this man in!

  • OMG>.I LOVE IT !!

  • If they both run for the republican nomination there is a danger that they could split the crucial moron vote, thus allowing a Pawlenty or Romney to get in.

  • This is the plan to improve foreign relations; "laughing at president palin is like laughing at someone in a wheelchair, i hope you're proud of yourselves."

    In all seriousness, I miss the days when I could respect our politicians.

  • overdrive.

    GOP=anti-worker

    sarah p has the nerve to call us union "brothers and sisters"; that's 2ff.

  • "Are you tired of having a PRESIDENT WHO BEND OVER for foreign countries?"

    This is just... unpatriotic.

    I hope really really hard that Sarah Palin runs for president, I think her head will explode if someone asks her how to do preschool math

  • lol, great video.

  • paln/ bachman, the real life Dumb and Dumber

  • Pick a non-reality star.

  • Chuck Norris? That's just one big on-going joke? Don't you realize that?

  • Exploding with laughter. Pleeeze run Sarah, pleeeeeze. There's just not enough entertainment out there, and we liberals would be eternally grateful for giving us back the Whitehouse.

  • sss

    visualize a functioning government. i was a sarah palin appointee here in ak prior to her abdication. she spent more time being petty and vindictive than being any sort of administrator.

    sss

  • Wow the uploader really hates Bill Maher

  • Anyone who thinks Palin-Bachmann stands a chance should look up Barry Goldwater, liberal landslide in 2012 if these two whackjobs get the republican nomination

  • This is an awesome vid, just one question why is it not properly classified as a comedy? It is true Bachmann said of running: "it is not on the table, it is not off the table" see in her deep thinking the "table" is just an abstraction that is not capable of having an uption upon it and just as not capable of not having an option on it... so WFT?? Is there even a table? What a retard LOL!

  • I'd love to have these two ignorant cunts run against Obama, and I'm LIBERAL!

  • Palin/Bachmann 2012!!!! "I'm with Stupid!" t-shirts

  • @corvettegray Actually, I would love to see these two run together or against each other in 2012 and in this world today , it just could happen.Wouldn't it be great to see the two of them debate. On ANY subject. America needs a little something to laugh about these days and this would be something to see. I can't wait.

  • @condor628 He can't prove who he is, so better not get you hopes up, because thirteen states have passed laws, making potential candidates prove who they are. LMAO !!!!!!!!

  • Run Sarah Run!! LMAO

    OBAMA 2012!!!

  • @klimaxxx06 He can't prove who he is, so better not get you hopes up, because thirteen states have passed laws, making potential candidates prove who they are. LMAO !!!!!!!!

  • 231 likes and 43 dislikes....if we can see the dislikes it would compare Bill Maher's head with the crap LOL

    I LOVE MY COUNTRY and for the record we are the baddest mothers in the world so get use to it.

  • @UTubekookdetector Why did you make a sock puppet account (Kathleen Ludington) just to pester me after all this time? Do you miss me? Saw your video on that channel, the one where you hypocritically whine about lowlifecool blocking you when you are notorious for blocking people right off the bat if they don't buy your sophistry. I know you won't respond here, you'll run back to your channel and/or website where I can't respond because you are chicken shit.

  • @UTubekookdetector Figured you are overdue for a reality check, Kook. Especially considering you talking shit on your page where you know I can't respond, coward. Wanna tell everyone again how Iraq was a lower percentage of the budget than Vietnam? Maybe cause the budget is a gazillion times bigger than it was back than, you baffoon. Or how about this one, "Reagan is a good example of a president that doesn't raise taxes". You're all smoke and mirrors, pal.

  • @GoodOldHalo Oh, and Kook, don't go around whining about government mandates for Health Insurance. They don't work, those crooked bastards still get away with death panel type murder.

  • Anyone that's interested can click on KOOK CENTRAL on the left side of my channel, I saved a few dozen of Halo's comments (she was blocked for created sock puppets and bringing up homosexual sex often) & refuted them on my website. Halo was challenged over a year ago to put up a vid response, to date she has balked at said challenge.

  • @UTubekookdetector I took the liberty of filling your friend ShadowGeiser in on the real reason you blocked me (which we both know has nothing to do with socks or homosexuals you lying sack of elephant shit). RONALD REAGAN RAISED TAXES!

  • @UTubekookdetector Haha, Utubekookdetector was most recently owned on HopeForPeaceNow's channel. Haha, what a loser. You always whine about me not excepting your challenge, but I bet you won't except hers. Coward.

  • @UTubekookdetector Hey Kook, did you admit on Kathleen channel that Hoover didn't start spending money on the great depression till 1930 and 33? Is that your argument against the spending freeze causing the great depression? Cause if it is it might interest you to know that the Great Depression started in 1929 you fucking idiot.

  • @UTubekookdetector You are a fucking idiot, kook. The great depression started on "Black Thursday" October 24 1929. You might be able to like to idiots like Kathleen but most people will see the link in my description and know you are a moron. Hell, most people are smart enough to know the great depression started in 29. You are pathetic.

  • @GoodOldHalo Anyone interested in seeing beyond Utubekookdetectors bullshit shouldn't go to his delusional channel or lonely website, they should watch him interact with people and see Kook make an ass out of himself.

  • I'm ready for a President that believes that we still live in a country that IS exceptional, not pitiful! Screw the Pissants of the world.

    Get your lazy asses up and go to work...NO MORE HANDOUTS!

  • Lets put CONSERVATISM back in America !!!!!! YES

  • ron paul is our only hope

  • This is going to be an awesome campaign. But, I like Ron Paul better.

  • @duvexy Now that is change. 

  • too Funny!!!!

  • Im an American, But if she gets elected I will move out of this country and denounce my citizenship.

  • @jasason10 Cool, when that happens take some of your friends with you ROFLMAO!!!

  • @jerry295 Oh I will!!! Thanks

  • @jasason10 See Ya! Maybe you can move to Iran.

  • @Baws750 No not Iran, conservatives of any type are not good ( muslim or christian) they both believe in fairy tales and act as they are reality.

    Probably move to Denmark, swiss, Amsterdam. You guy can have fun brown nosing Palin out there in Jesus land. I'll sit back and laugh as you retards turn America into laughing stock of the world.lol

  • Great Editing! I Love It!

    These 2 Super Ladies have More Balls than All Libs put together!!

  • Look, Yeah Buddy! Palin for President! Time for real hope and change in the next elections. Vote the Bower and scraper in Chief out of office

  • God I hope this happens, it would be a ticket destined for failure

  • Now that's a ticket I could see voting for..

  • @QUEENLEENO1 me too;

  • @carlinj832000 You people scare me. I have known for years Americans are brainless idiots but I can't believe there are people crazy and stupid enough to want these two crackpots in office. What the hell's the matter with you?! Do you not realize the world already laughs their asses off at the U.S.? The election of either of these yahoos would destroy our image irreparably.

  • @jfkjrlover im always wondering about where your loyaties too this country stand;

  • Ain't gonna happen - and I'm a conservative. Palin's been doing too many RINO things.

  • @thejimmyzshow

    That's cause all the Neocons are RINOs

  • @thejimmyzshow for so you say.

  • This will not be... ever. but it is very humerous. and if she does get in we MUST as an true Americans, kill her.

  • Love this and you know it's TRUE. Obama is a WUSS

  • Mark my words conservatives. Sarah Palin will give Obama a second term if she is nominated. I'm pleading with you, don't vote for her!

  • Absolutely loved it.

  • No way palin even gets the nomination.

  • So funny! You can tell the liberals who have responded to this vid....all potty mouths. That is all they know how to do when they know they are defeated. They are all like that big gag of gas, Bill Maher.....his head full of feces. Typical. GO SARAH!!!

  • @CJSzy... into the bughouse sarah! cause that´s where you belong to!

  • Eleanor Clift will have a coronary!

  • Fuck Voting ! !

    too late for that bullshit now ! !

  • Im behind her, Like it said at least there will be some testerone in the office.

  • @darrellmellissa : Seems like the only ones with testosterone these days are women. Men aren't allowed to act like men anymore, just women are.

  • so the answer to too much government is somebody who expanded government and supported government invading my private life when she had power, then quit?

    She's an emotion, if she was fat and ugly she might be mayor by now..

  • @yostevoak1 Sure, compared to the guy who voted present 130 while a Senator. If she was half white/black had big ears a toothy grin plus a disdain for America and Americans, she could be Obama. I don't think Palin had anything to do with Obama continuing the Patriot Act either.

  • OH GOD PLEASE LET US HEAR THAT LINE IN 2012 PLEASE I'LL NEVER ASK FOR ANYTHING AGAIN.

    PALIN 2012

  • /watch?v=XEQdYdCfl60

    /watch?v=MjRoDNcLkLU

    /watch?v=kF1kFlFe35Y

    palindeceptiondotcom

  • AWESOME VIDEO!

    They have my vote!

  • Well, all this petty bickering aside, I thought the video was quite funny. And seeing Bill Maher's head explode was well worth the 2½ minutes of viewing. Especially the sight of his blood spewing out of his puss-filled body. Splendid!

  • @DoktorFranken Glad you enjoyed the vid and Maher's exploding head, but if you take a closer look at the last few seconds, you will see that he is full of something, but it is not puss.

  • @FleetwoodFactor

    I saw that and I think that he's full of it...

  • @DoktorFranken That was Not pus!

  • Those interested can see the second link on the left side of my channel, we've refuted GOODOLDHALO's contrived arguments many times. No generalization there.

  • If by some unholy means she finds her way into the White House, we should find comfort in the likely possibility she will quit soon thereafter to pursue bigger and better things!

  • So now it's "I" huh? No more we we? I'm autistic? You repeat yourself like Rain Man. In one of your video's I counted three times you told the same joke about Obama saying "Marine CORPSE". You gonna provide an actual link to information or keep running your mouth like an idiot? Probably run your mouth, since you never asked me about tax forms and small businesses.

  • GOSTP: We accept your concession concerning the insolvency of entitlement programs (PS, thanks for watching our vids, we appreciate it). We have also documented this at watch?v=24pdHeQZiwc

    I did ask you about tax forms 5 days ago. Pay attention kid. The HC bill requires small businesses to file a lot more 1099s now. "We will bury you" in paperwork. I might as well ask you this one more time, can you name one gov't program on time and on budget?

  • @UTubekookdetector No you didn't, idiot. You must have asked someone else. You accept my concession? You really are a lunatic. You're the asshole who said you were done debating me. Now here you are, rattling off the same insanity you always do like a nerdy broken record.

  • GOSTP: We checked the archives and the message was in fact sent to you. Sorry! The HC bill requires small businesses to file a lot more 1099 forms. We're glad to get you up-to-speed on this. Next question: Remember when Hussein said if you like your insurance you can keep it? Does that apply to those with Flex accounts, HSAs and HC coverage in general? Good luck, you will need it.

  • @UTubekookdetector Your archives don't mean shit on account of you being a pathological liar. Like the time you challenged me and MIT to a debate on a video you knew we were banned at. Or you going around telling everyone that me and other conceed when we don't. Yes KIook, the HC is going to have drawbacks. I don't know about flex accounts, and I don't care. Everyone can now get health coverage. That's a good thing no matter how much we have to spend or adjust you alarmist fruit cake.

  • GOSTP: Sounds like she's not up-to-speed. Now she's resorting to "I don't care" arguments. The fat lady is humming. Flex Accounts are now limited, previously you could put as much $ as you wanted in them. Use it or lose it though. "No matter how much we have to spend?" I would've never predicted you would get this desperate. The Janitor is afraid of me. No comment on the "if you like your coverage you can keep it"? You sound angry and frustrated.

  • @UTubekookdetector Considering the unhealthy obsession you have with McCainisthrough, I'm guessing he's afriad you'll steal his underwear or hump his leg. When you whine to me about Flex accounts being limited, it means nothing since for 200+ years we've had "the law" which limits people in a thousand which ways. Talk about not up to speed. I don't sound like anything since I'm typing on the internet, ass. Just being "specific".

  • @UTubekookdetector Considering the unhealthy obsession you have with McCainisthrough, I'm guessing he's afriad you'll steal his underwear or hump his leg. When you whine to me about Flex accounts being limited, it means nothing since for 200+ years we've had "the law" which limits people in a thousand which ways. Talk about not up to speed. I don't sound like anything since I'm typing on the internet, ass. Just being "specific".

  • GOSTP: The Janitor is just an easy target and your rant is quite generalized. You have no clue about his HC bill do you? Your "200+ years" comment is apples to oranges. Try again. Many companies are going to find it's cheaper to pay the fine for not covering their employees than to get into some insurance exchange. Next question: Do you believe the HC bill assists small businesses in hiring because the tax credit is in effect now? Be careful with your answer.

  • @UTubekookdetector Please. You have many Youtube enemies but you obsess over him more than anybody. Not to mention that you copy his whole "we" thing when everyone knows you're alone. It's not apples to oranges you fruitcake, limits are needed. That's the point. All you know about the Health Care bill are the faults while you ignore the rest like the republican tool you are.

  • GOSTP: No dice kid. Your generalized "200 years" rant doesn't cut it. We accept yoru concession on our small business question. You haven't read the bill, we're informing you now. Next and final question: Is ObamaCare going to raise or lower premiums for young people and is it or is it not going to create shortages for those on bankrupt gov't HC programs?

  • @UTubekookdetector How is it generalized to say that the purpose of law is to limit things? To not let people do whatever they want? You couldn't inform someone on how to eat cereal let alone a bill that you are clearly biased against simply cause you're a conservative tool.

  • GOSTP: Again, more generalization, but we do thank you for "answering" our questions and for the bulletin board material. I would suggest from now on (remember your Hoover gaffe?) that you actually read the bill before you start yammering. Thanks again and we'll have our final update on you up in Kook Central this weekend hopefully. Tata!

  • @UTubekookdetector Here's an idea kook, how about instead of making the same bullshit point about "generalizations" you actually point out WHAT is genrealized. Oh wait, you can't because you know I"m rightl.

  • @UTubekookdetector You know what kook? You and all the other immoral asshole conservatives who bitch about health care are no better than the plantation owners who bitched about how ending slavery would hurt business and the economy. Put that in your archive you pathetic loser.

  • GOSTP: Funny that you should mention "immorality" as if you believe in objective morality kiddo. We've already accepted your concession, you're just trying to save face now. Here's what you're going to do next. Go get the pretend doctor and tell her to get over here. We have some questions to ask her pertaining to objective/subjective morality in an upcoming refutation of some of her cut-and-paste atheism videos. We eagerly await her appearance and tell her good luck, she'll need it.

  • @UTubekookdetector Who are you to talk about concessions? All you ever do is tap dance around the subject. I assume the pretend doctor is the McCainisthrough. I assume that simply because of your pathological obsession with him.

  • GOSTP: We (we use an augmented voice sometimes) left a message with you and the legally retarded hippie to go get the pretend doctor and have her come over here. We need some background material for an upcoming refutation of some of her atheism vids. Unless, the pretend doctor is afraid? We'll give her 24 hours. Those interested can check the 2nd link on the left side of our channel, we have refuted GOSTP many times. Tata!

  • @UTubekookdetector You're an idiot kook. Only an idiot would think that ranting on there own website constitutes proof of anything.

  • GOSTP: You're so angry LOL. We'll assume the Janitor is conceding. You're going to take her place. You made a comment on Bulldogs' channel some time ago: "God, what the f*** is that?" Your Captain sock and your GOSTP account have accused us of being "immoral" for being against ObamaCare. We'd like to know, as an atheist, where does your belief in objective morality come from? Is it metaphysical, does it come from the gov't or from the individual?

  • @UTubekookdetector Yet another hypocritical deflection from a guy who dedicates his life to bitching about people on youtube. I don't remember saying that, but I'll check out your little minions page. I'm not an atheist. I believe in god more than any conservative or fundamentalists who use him/her as a crutch. My belief comes from the idea that human life matters more than green paper.

  • GOSTP: We didn't expect a concession so soon. I mentioned that libtards like yourself think that FEMA is god and you said, "God, what the ***k is that." That's pretty much how all your arguments go, you argue like some stumbling drunk a the Rusty Lunchbox. Your historical revisionism won't work here kiddo. You must be flustered if you had a paradigm shift in the last few days. Tata! We just hammered the Janitor again.

  • @UTubekookdetector I must have really stumped you this time, kook. You're using more logical fallacies than you usually do. Non-sequitirs, strawman argument, extreme man, circular logic. BTW, you can't even spell "at" right so you must not be "too bright". Yout also said "no" instead of "not" in your other post. Seems to me you're the flustered one, you projecting little rain man. Fact is the bigger america gets the more it has to spend. Period. But you'd rather reject the bigger picture.

  • GOSTP: No need to cover that again, we've refuted you a dozen or more time on our website. WE find it funny you didn't even remember your rebuttal to our statement about FEMA. That's why we recorded your comments, you always slip up and make contradictory statements. If America has to spend more, why did you shy away from a debate about the ARRA? You know Keynesian economics is a failure. That's all folks, you won't get any more attention from us unless you put up a HC vid.

  • @UTubekookdetector Because the ARRA is yet another one of your deflections cause you don't want to discuss the actual topic. You're not even contesting my point about America getting bigger, just bringing up an old argument which you claim to be against doing with your "we've [actual it's ME since kook is all alone in the world} refuted it on our {my} website" blah blah blah. Talk about contradicatory. It's apparent you hate yourself kook, get psychological help.

  • GOSTP: One more thing my autistic little friend, that "green paper" wouldn't have so much power and wouldn't be causing us so much trouble now if Wilson had no created the Federal Reserve and Democrats hadn't defeated Ron Paul's House amendment to audit it. Their easy-money policies will exacerbate our coming bout with inflation.

  • This video won't let me respond to Kookbag. I want an ACTUAL source Kook. Not you pretending that your yellow journalism means anything. Take a few seconds to post a link to where you got your information.

  • GOSTP: As I said before you had problems booting up your mom's computer, check the trustees' reports for Social Security and Medicare kid. This isn't your mother's house where you can throw an autistic fit and get your way. Adjusting for inflation, we're $100 trillion in the hole. Uneduated libtards can whine about any spending you want, in the end entitlements are going to sink us. Now if you have a viable rebuttal (no need to thank us for the info), by all means post it.

  • GOSTP: You also forgot to answer our question about tax forms and small businesses under ObamaCare. Any idea how much paperwork they got dumped on them?

  • @UTubekookdetector You are a coward. Instead of talking shit to me what do you do? You hide in your blocked channel and talk shit about an old argument that I beat you in. Hoover did nothing to try and fix the problem till it was too late. That's a specific fact that you won't acknowledge cause you are a pathetic idealogue. You want some people who say that? Rachel Maddow for one, a Rhodes Scholar who is infinetly smarter than a conservative sycophant like you will ever be.

  • Testing

  • FUCKIN AWESOME.

    GO PALIN!

  • Love this video! Great job! This will drive the whiney libs crazy! perfect.

  • This IS a joke, right ? Palin and Bachmann ???

    Americans were seen as morons when they (and Diebold..) voted in Bush and his leering masters TWICE, but you'll look like utter brain-dead zombies if anyone is stupid enough to vote for these two clueless puppets of the Monolith.

    IQ testing BEFORE voting should be compulsory.

    The Founding Fathers must be turning in their graves and regretting not including a clause ensuring morons and puppets of sly fascism couldn't run for office.

  • Comment removed

  • I'm a liberal who would LOVE to see a Palin/Bachmann ticket.  Even conservatives wouldn't vote for these two insane bimbos.

  • MARY: I could see you having some apprehensions about Mrs. Palin, but what about Bachmann? What facet of her voting record do you have a problem with?

  • She has made a lot of crazy and idiotic comments all over the media. As for her voting record--it's pretty much lock step with every other conservative so I would have the same problem with her record as I would with any other hard-right social conservative who wants to expand the rights of gun owners and religious extremists but limit those of gays & lesbians and pregnant women.

  • MARY: That was quite the topic-laden rant. I assume you must have some problems with a plain reading of the Second Amendment? What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand.

    Your objection there seems quite curious. I got a kick out of your generalized "she has made a lot of crazy... comments" remark.

  • There's a reason she's known as "Batshit Bachman"--you can google it if you want. The one that springs to mind is her idiocy telling her constituents not to take part in the census--which I would actually like to see them do because if they're underreported they could lose a rep.

    And you seem to have no problem "infringing" on the rights of gays & lesbians and pregnant women. I'm actually fine with people owning guns, but conservatives have made a fetish of it that is pretty unhealthy.

  • MARY: Marriage would be a 10th amendment task since it is not spelled out as a federal task. I'm assuming you're dropping your 2nd amend. rant?

    Google? Surely you jest. Is that how you conduct research? Google? Huh?

    The Census document currently contains many questions that are not constitutional. They have no business knowing one's income or if they have hot and cold running water, etc.

    It is specifically to apportion reps. for the House of Representatives, as the Founders intended.

  • I'm really not interested in arguing with right wing kooks. Google's as good a resource as your reliance on Faux news and right wing websites. Tell you what--go ahead and nominate Bachmann & Palin for president. I, as a liberal, would love to see it--they'll lose big time.

  • I accept your concession MARY. Apparently you had no idea about the unconstitutional questions contained in the Census and the fact that it's not a lottery to see who can get more $ from the federal gov't. The states have been feeding off the federal teat for quite some time and it's outpaced inflation.

  • HA HA. Kook gets his faux facts from the conservative book club. He can't answer a real question unless there's an answer in one of his outdated books.

  • Conservative book club...limited to Atlas Shrugged and Ronald Reagans memoirs.

  • GOSTP: If you want to debate you'll do it here. No more claming to be blocked and running from video to video to make it more difficult for others to follow the conversation. Do we need to ask you again: Name 5 "big things" Medicare does cover and 5 "little things" it doesn't cover.

  • @UTubekookdetector This isn't the video I was blocked from moron. I was blocked from the I'm voting Democrat Video. I've NEVER had a problem debating you on any one video you insipid liar. You can ask again, but every time I give you an answer you ignore it.

  • GOSTP: VerticalBlu informed us that you were not blocked, you made it up so you could drag the debate over to numerous vids. I see you still can't name items that Medicare does and doesn't cover which proves that you are relying on a talking point. Concession accepted. Next question, is the HC bill signed by Obama deficit-neutral? I contend that it is not, what say ye? Good luck.

  • @UTubekookdetector I know he's informed you of that. You've said that a million times. You repeat yourself too often to whine about other people using talking points. Either VerticalBlu is a liar or an idiot. I'm guessing both. It's probably not deficit neutral. That doesn't mean that's it's not the right thing to do. I know a callous conservative like you won't understand that though.

  • GOSTP: Probably not? Ahahaha Obama said it was, don't you believe him? Is he a liar or an idiot? You seem very uncomfortable here. Well, Medicare and SS are certainly not deficit neutral. By 2080 we have over $100 trillion in unfunded obligations. You're right, it's not deficit neutral by a long shot. They purposely omitted the "doc fix" which will raise spending and the over 16K new IRS agents needed.

  • @UTubekookdetector I say probably and you say I'm calling Obama an idiot? For somebody who runs around claiming internet victory all the time you sure do rely on Strawman arguments and other tricks. 2080? Are you fucking kidding me? You need to provide a link. And I don't mean one of your bullshit links. Post it in your profile so you can't make this excuse of "you didn't replace the periods".

  • GOSTP: You can find all the relevant information in my Obama article, which is linked on the left side of my channel. You obviously haven't read any of the reports by CMMS. I've also gone over this numerous times in Kook Central, correcting yoour buddy the Janitor from Chicago. Next question: Does the HC bill make tax filing easier for small business or does it add a lot of paperwork? This ought to be funny.

  • @UTubekookdetector And why don't you want to debate me on the other video? Is it because you don't want people to see me and that Zega guy own you?

  • FART: It seems for some reason you're avoiding our discussion of AGW now? I have plenty of your musings archived, is that why? Are you afraid you'll embarrass yourself? If you're conceding that we can talk about Social Security next. I read some of your previous comments on it and I have a few questions for you. I'll explain it in "a simple MANNOR" for you though old man.

  • @UTubekookdetector Funny how your the one who disappears for a week and now I'm avoiding the discussion? How embarrassing indeed. Why don't you go ahead and declare victory and post it on your channel for all 4 of your kook friends to see like you usually do.

  • FART: I think you're confusing the fact that I don't have inordinate amounts of free time with the fact that you have inordinate amounts of free time. So you don't want to talk Social Security. From some of your previous comments, it seems you misunderstand it completely.

    I did enjoy your comment on RITR's vid about "basically uninterrupted growth" (If I'm quoting you right) from the 1930s until the 80s. That was certainly a gut-buster. Everytime you open your mouth, your feet go in.

  • I think your the one saying i'm avoiding the discussion because I don't have inordinate amounts of time to deal to with your drivel.

    IF you don't understand the words "basically uninterrupted growth" I can explain them to you seeing as they are obviously over your head.

  • FART: FART: Why don't you post that rant again word-for-word? You said from the 30s to the 80s we had "basically uninterrupted growth", yet we had 11 years that registered negative GDP growth and 6 cases of at least 2 consecutive (sometimes 3) quarters of negative GDP growth. I'll wager that you can't find any 25 year period in that time frame that had lower avg. unemployment and higher GDP growth than in the 1983-2008 period.

  • FART: You must also remember little man, that poorer economies typically grow faster and then level off, making the growth from 1983-2008 even more remarkable.

  • FART: Are you standing by your claim about economic growth 1933-80? From 83-08, we only had one year of negative GDP growth and only 7 qtrs. total that were negative.

    Certainly, some of that growth was due to Fannie/Freddie's meddling in the housing market, but on the flip side we would've had a "soft landing' as we did when the tech bubble burst in 2000.

  • FART: Did you give up old man? I have another question for you. You said several months ago on here that Reagan's missile defense initiatives have been a failure. Are you standing by that comment old man? We've come quite a ways in that regard since the 1980s.

  • FART: I just wanted to inform you that we graciously accept your concession. Thanks for the fodder. I would advise you to take a basic economics class and don't allow your mouth to write checks your in