lookin at a regular damn cube for any length of time is a 4d cube, am I right? i mean I like what you did there, but it seems like an awful lot of effort and fancy movements to show something so simple
A cube is a 3D figure (like square is 2D figure), you can't make cube in 4D, just like you can't make squares in 3D. The figure you present on this video is called "tesseract", which is a 4D variant of the hypercube.
To all you idiots that are saying the fourth dimension is time, you're right (ACCORDING TO PHYSICS). The fourth dimension depicted in this video is the fourth spatial dimension in Euclidean Space. These are two different theories. Jesus, gotta love the kids who take one class in physics and think they know it all.
@Hauserdav whenever you say 1d/2d/3d/4d/231334d, you're talking about all spacial dimensions involved. Time is just included afterwards, since it's always present.
@Hauserdav - nah. We're talking about Eucleidean dimensions, time isn't an eucleidean concept. Fourth dimension is still an actual way of movement. Forget about Hermann Minkowski's theory, because it's non-Eucleidean.
In a 4D world that tessaract would have all sides the same length and all corners would be 90 degree angles. If you can imagine that, congratulations! You're a 4D being
@cuboos One poit in past vanishes,the moment,we move proceed to another in future,which is non existant at present.All the three phases of Time are incapable of being sensed & witnessed simultanuously,hence time cann't be any spatial dimension.
Dear everyone who has ever sent me a comment ever. FUCK YOU. I got your message the first time. Why the fuck do you think I need to hear it again 4 times a day for the rest of my life!?
@anagabrielabrienza Vi tu modelo pero sigue siendo una representación limitada a 3 dimensiones, largo, alto y profundidad. La cuarta dimensión tiene que encontrarse en un eje diferente, tal como los anteriores lo están. Ambos cubos deben estar conectados por rectas paralelas entre si, cosa que es imposible de graficar ya que no podemos concebir la trayectoria en la que las rectas viajarían. Insertar un cubo dentro de otro no cambia las dimensiones en las que se encuentra.
@djr3000 I understand it is not the fourth.But fifth dimension certainly is state of mind which clearly envision the space respective to each subordinate coordinate displayed in their respective fields of function.
As we are all beings of the 3D you can imagine 4D as our past and present. as much as 2D creatures cannot see anything in 3D, 3D creatures cant see anything before and after our present!
@BattlestarGaming 4.axis is same as that of three known spatial dimension's.However axis of Time is different,if it is taken to be considered as to be an independent spatial dimension.
The concept of a 4D cube is exciting, really. Sure, we would never be able to comprehend such a concept, but the idea is a cool one. To compare it, look up the concept of a flatland. Interesting shit.
thats a moving cube. i hate when scientists think they can explain the fourth dimension. if you can't explain the third dimension in the second dimension, you can't explain the 4th in the 3rd
@Jojoateyt You can project a 3D object onto a 2D surface. Likewise, you can "project" a 4D object into 3D space. In this video, you see a 3D projection, or "shadow", of a rotating 4D cube.
@Jojoateyt A dimension is simply a vector space at right angles to the others. I can move in one dimension if I like, or up/down left/right. Since they are orthogonal. they are considered separate dimensions. The 4th dimension is a physical, just as physical as length, dimension of time. Our reality is a sliver of a larger 4-d object which contains all states of our reality, past present and future. We CAN visualize higher dimensions and also use them for understanding reality!
@Jojoateyt you can project 4D into 3D... and get cool images like this... if A scientist talks about 4D though, it's usually in mathematical terms, which is more than suitable for describing 4D, or any nD.
@Jojoateyt Actually,you CAN explain 3D on a 2D.You can even Visualize it.
Think about it.If a 3D cube is rotated on your 2D TV screen, a 3D figure is automatically percepted by your brain.The same applies to a higher dimension.With the help of motion (rotating), you CAN visualize a 4D cube,provided,you rotate it on a 3D plane.That's the reason videos are useless, when it comes to help us visualize 4D Hypercubes. You need to rotate the stuff in real 3D world, not on a screen, which is only 2D.
@Jojoateyt You can explain a view of the 3D object in 2D space i.e. front view, side view etc. Similarly you can see one view of a 4D object in 3D space (or 2D space + time). Viewing in True N-dimensional space (N>3) is probably impossible since 1) our minds aren't designed for it 2) it's existence in the macro levels is unproven (string theories extra dimensions are at the sub-sub atomic level)
@Jojoateyt Just like you pointed out, the video can only show perspectives of the tesseract, it would be impossible to show the trajectory of a 4th dimensional axis. People have to stop trying to find it and comprehend WHY it's impossible.
@Jojoateyt While I agree with you here, things like this aren't explanations. Their representations. Just like how a drawing of a cube isn't an explanation for a three-dimensional model, it's just something that represents it.
@maipieq so you're calling me stupid, plus what has grammer got to do with this video. anyways all im saying is that your not the only one who understands it :)
watch carl sagen talkin about this figure :o he taught me (as some people already commented) that this is what the shadow of this 4d object looks like...or something crazy like that
@bankaikun94 ITS a 3rd dimensional shadow of a 4th dimensional object.... when you draw a cube on paper you made a 2nd dimensional shadow of a 3rd dimensional object.... simple as that
For every idiot who is commenting to my comment ''I don't fucking get it'' please stop. I can make one my own in 2d version plus we from the 3D world don't get the 4th dimention, which is why I made the comment in the first place. And I wanted thumbs up without asking for it.
0d is pretty much a point, you cant travel in any direction. 1d is a line in which you can only travel in 2 directions, left and right. 2d consists of length ah and width, in which you can travel left, right, forward and backward. 3d consists of length, width and height, in which you can travel left, right, up, down, forward and backwards. 4d is the same as 3d, except with an added axis, the 4d axis. this is called time. so my guesses are that if you time travel u become 4d.
@VBEducation1 Shadow itself is space extension of mother 3d object,joining to it on 4d axis,in an euclidean spate,distinguished from three spates,the mother body is distributed into.
A tesseract is a 4d cube. for a square, one line connects to 2 other lines, for a cube, one square connects to 4 of them and in this video the cube inside a cube makes 6 other cubes around there just not cube looking since we cant view the 4th dimension. one cube connects to 6 other cubes for a 4d cube. if a 2d being grew eyes in the 3d world and looked through a seethrough cube hovering above, it'll see a square in a square with the vertexes connected, just like the cube in a cube connect(4d).
Im gonna sound like a real nerd but this is how it works. 0D is a dot with no space, 1D is a line and is tecnically a measurement, a square is a 2D object created by the x axis and the y axis which has four 1D objects(four lines) to create it, a cube is a 3D object created by the x,y and z axis which has 6 2D objects(6 squares) to create it. Theres a pattern in this, 2 dots for a line(1d) 4 lines for a square(2d) 6 squares for a cube(3d) so im thinking 8 cubes for a Tesseract? YES! count them.
@ratchetman4 0d is not merely a dot with no space,it is a wormhole wherethrough all the four dimensions reduces into the fifth one.But the question still exists as to what is the fourth one.??
i get it.....no im joking all i see is the inside becoming the outside....and then becoming the inside again.....king've like the water has it's natural recycling system..
This s a 3d construct and explanable with out an extra dimension. I fail to see how a cube enfolding upon itself proves the theory of a 4th dimenson. The first 3 dimensions are mutually orthogonal, it is physically impossible to add another 90 degree plane to the other three. Time is not a dimension, it is the measure of motion of all 3 dimensions simulteaneously in our Universe. So, where is this mythematical egghead postulated extra dimension? Anyone want to try to explain this to me?
@77GSlinger We cannot experience more than 3 dimensions. This however does not mean 3 is the limit of possible dimensions, it's just the limit of dimensions we exist in.
For a simple example, try explaining the concept of up and down to a 2d object.
The 4th dimension is just another direction, like up and down, back and forth etc.
We just can't imagine this fourth direction of movement since our universe only supports 3.
TLDR: 4 dimensions exist, just not in our Universe.
If the 4th dimension does not exist in our Universe of what value is it to us and why should we waste any time thinking about it? What I mean is of what Practical value is it to us?
@77GSlinger Well studying it provides a better understanding of how our universe works, for example how the universe can be infinite yet contain a finite amount of energy and matter.
Exploring that which we cannot see a reason to explore is how breakthroughs are made!
@Hendurik If the Universe is infinite, how can it contain a finite amount of energy and matter? This is a glaring contradiction! And, how would a 4d cube prove that an infinite Universe has a finite amount of energy and matter. I fail to see the connection between the two. Thank you for your time and explaining the academic reasons attributed to this strange so-called 4d cube which appears to be only a 3d cube with some fancy animated enfolding technique to confuse the viewer!
@77GSlinger If you watch a 3d object such as a cube rotating on your computer screen you'll still be able to percieve that it has 3 dimensions, even though it's projected in 2 dimensions on the screen. The reason behind this is that when the cube rotates you'll see the cube from different angles. The theory then, is that if you take a 3d model of a 4d object such as a tesseract and rotate it, you'll see a projection of the 4d.
@77GSlinger I really don't have enough space in a youtube comment to explain the infinite universe - finite energy thing. If you're curious I could write you a PM about it instead :)
@Hendurik We can experience Dimensions up to 8.But can not give em a mathematics to dimensions beyond the fourth one.The fact is that the whole 3d universe is observed & experienced in 4Th dimensional canvass.Take it in mind that 4Th d is not suggestive of a mega structuring device,but contrary to it,4Th dimension is reductive stage and whole universe with all its qualitative as well as qualitative properties intact can begot in a tennis boll size sphere.
@Lolocaust41 Yeah I know, but I still don't get it and this animation does not prove there is a 4d, ts just a cube within a cube enfolding upon itself.
@77GSlinger When a single line is extended beyond infinity,it reduces into fourth dimension,just becoming orthogonal to mother point at 180 degree perpendicular round the polar circumferance of such sphere point.
@77GSlinger What do you think of angular deviation in a light beam just coming down from infinity,enters into a transparent medium.Can you explain me what this angular deviation represent to!
I agree you in point,it is really very difficult to prove the point i have raised above,but not quite impossible.
@alkagrawala The language translator you are using does not state the question you are asking in a clear manner. Angular deviation of light beam coming down from infinity? Angular deviation? There are no "light beams" in Nature, there are only electrically simulated light waves.
"Can you explain me what this angular deviation represent to"
This is unintelligible. I have no idea what you are asking here. Are you talking about light entering our atmosphere from space? it's angle????
@77GSlinger I understand the three coordinates do not cover the whole space within its rotational ambit.Some space still leaves behind to be taken into account.The question is where it hides behind ! I understand the space in between the lines of deviation at point O upon the interphase is space of fourth spatial dimention and is as such measurable in its degrees of rotation.
@alkagrawala a beam of light (at one specific freq/radiation) is the only thing we can truly call 1D. Infinite and fixed. most others we know of are 4D n' 3D
@elyaye Nice.Thanks for your advice.But this phenomenon will become quite important on moment i will be finding a possibility of getting through a wormhole.
@77GSlinger When a beam of light at this end of Universe can undergo deviational regression,why a number line cannot undergo the same at destination infinity.
I withdraw the word 'Beyond' from my definition above,with intention to make the matter more persistent relevant to immediate issue in discussion.The word beyond may please be deemed deleted from onwards.
@alkagrawala Ok, deleting the word beyond infinity removes the redundancy, however, you still can never prove your claim since it is physically unverifiable. It is just an arm chair theory you have created to satisfy your own musing on the subject. It does not prove a 4th dimension.
@XtremeLetsPlay This is an exercise in abstract math. Timespace theory is merely an application of it in physics. The video is a perspective projection of a rotating tesseract. A tesseract is a mathematical construct, an analog of a cube that requires a 4-dimensional Euclidean topology to exist. Time is irrelevant to the context.
@XtremeLetsPlay wrong time is just a part of the 4d exactly like its a part of the 3d..time its not a dimention..in 4d you dont have time..time its endless..
@MrSmileyThe actually there are 12 dimensions 11 spacial and one time. so this is the forth spacial dimension. technically you can place time anywhere you want in the list but it is most logically the 12th because all spacial dimensions have direct correlation to the rest of the spacial dimensions where as time dos not.
Plus a 3d cube is made up of '6' 2d squares which are made up of '4' 2d lines...
So a 4d cube would be made up of... '8' 3d cubes and that is what this is!!!
There is a cube in the middle a cube on the left of the middle cube a cube on the right of the middle cube on above one bellow one in front and one behind it... and the 8th cube which is around all the other cubes!!!
This video shows how all the cubes can move within each other and can go to the center!! :D
@RandomDirectors Correct, except that the cubes are never actually inside of each other. The cubes make up the surface of the object, meet each other at right angles, and are all equidistant from the actual center.
the inner part stretches out and expands whilst the lower part decreases it size and then the bigger part overlaps the smaller one and the process repeats.
@TheBlackeyegalaxy this figure is flat...not 4d or 3d...but if u had it in real life...no matter where u look at it...u will always see 3 dimensions unlike a regular 3d cube or figure..basicly creating a 4d figure
@zoodini Zoodini, you sound like a smart guy, I only wrote that comment to get thumbs up. It is a Flat figure meant to be 2D in a 3 D world rottating in 4 D which I cannot understand cause I am so used to the 3D. Seeing a 4D figure in a 2D screen / thing on a 3D world isn't gonna help us much understanding, even making the figure itself in real life like we can rotate it with our own hands is hard to understand it. I am not dumb, just wanted to get sum thumbs up ;)
Draw a square. Then draw four more squares, each sharing an edge with the first. Draw one last square sharing any of the outside edges with one of the four squares. You can now take this flat image, cut it out, and fold it along the edges to create a cube.
Now take a cube. Attach another cube to each of its 6 faces, and attach one more to any of the outermost faces. In the same manner you folded the squares in 3D to create a cube, the 8 cubes can be folded in 4D to create a tesseract (4d cube)
@VechtMalthos I know. It was just a comment to get thumbs up, I could draw this cube in 2D when I was 13 even. And no, I do not understand the forth dimention.
Anything we can percieve is 3d. Stupid.
TheDemx27 4 hours ago
aauurrghh!! (ahnold sound)
vemvillhaenpinne 2 days ago
lookin at a regular damn cube for any length of time is a 4d cube, am I right? i mean I like what you did there, but it seems like an awful lot of effort and fancy movements to show something so simple
treehugginkyle 2 days ago
A cube is a 3D figure (like square is 2D figure), you can't make cube in 4D, just like you can't make squares in 3D. The figure you present on this video is called "tesseract", which is a 4D variant of the hypercube.
lodziklocPL 1 week ago
It's only a cube with a hole inside that is turning itself inside out.
FelixErikson 1 week ago
aaaah my brain hurt's
PownageVidsByNick 1 week ago
yea
marreyes100 2 weeks ago
my brain huts...
CineBoxStudio 2 weeks ago
To all you idiots that are saying the fourth dimension is time, you're right (ACCORDING TO PHYSICS). The fourth dimension depicted in this video is the fourth spatial dimension in Euclidean Space. These are two different theories. Jesus, gotta love the kids who take one class in physics and think they know it all.
ACSchott 2 weeks ago
A 5D cube ( 4D is actually time)
that we can only see in 3D
is displayed in 2D
NIIICEEE
Hauserdav 2 weeks ago
@Hauserdav whenever you say 1d/2d/3d/4d/231334d, you're talking about all spacial dimensions involved. Time is just included afterwards, since it's always present.
RSwtfboom 2 weeks ago
@Hauserdav - nah. We're talking about Eucleidean dimensions, time isn't an eucleidean concept. Fourth dimension is still an actual way of movement. Forget about Hermann Minkowski's theory, because it's non-Eucleidean.
lodziklocPL 1 week ago
You must mean a 3D shadow of a 4D cube being rotated (shown in 2D projection unless you have a 3D TV)
Prussiluskan42 2 weeks ago
mmm...nah, it's to easy to comprehend to be the fourth dimension
MusicallyRetardedKid 2 weeks ago
The fourth dimension is time. Fail
emotekon 2 weeks ago
@emotekon no it isn't, not in the sense of a fourth spacial dimension. please don't talk about stuff you don't know about.
otakuofanime 2 weeks ago
@emotekon The fourth dimension is space time. Fail
vividMario52 1 week ago
In a 4D world that tessaract would have all sides the same length and all corners would be 90 degree angles. If you can imagine that, congratulations! You're a 4D being
Thedeepfryar 2 weeks ago
Sry but the 4th dimension is actually a timeline connecting e.g you 4 years ago and the you now. Its not about geometry anymore
KaysaDota 3 weeks ago
isn't fourth dimensional one point in time to another?
cuboos 3 weeks ago
@cuboos One poit in past vanishes,the moment,we move proceed to another in future,which is non existant at present.All the three phases of Time are incapable of being sensed & witnessed simultanuously,hence time cann't be any spatial dimension.
alkagrawala 1 week ago
It's official... He broke science...
AydenMize 3 weeks ago
Dear everyone who has ever sent me a comment ever. FUCK YOU. I got your message the first time. Why the fuck do you think I need to hear it again 4 times a day for the rest of my life!?
Jojoateyt 3 weeks ago
Cubeception
cmak5 3 weeks ago
whats the point of trying to look at the fourth dimension with physiology that can only sense three dimensions...
kevinsimpson93 3 weeks ago
@kevinsimpson93 No friend,physiology can sense and experience upto 8-dimensions,need is to appreciate them'll.
alkagrawala 1 week ago
@alkagrawala how so?
kevinsimpson93 1 week ago
I will admit. The animation going into this is rather impressive.
Blasted2Oblivion 3 weeks ago
thumbs up if this messes with your head ;)
PalmerOllie 3 weeks ago
FOURTH DIMENSION - IT IS EASIER THAN WE THOUGHT:
LA CUARTA DIMENSIÓN - ES MUCHO MÁS SENCILLO DE LO QUE HUBIÉRAMOS PODIDO IMAGINAR:
anagabrielabrienza.blogspot.com
Cordialmente,
Ana Gabriela Brienza
anagabrielabrienza 4 weeks ago
@anagabrielabrienza Vi tu modelo pero sigue siendo una representación limitada a 3 dimensiones, largo, alto y profundidad. La cuarta dimensión tiene que encontrarse en un eje diferente, tal como los anteriores lo están. Ambos cubos deben estar conectados por rectas paralelas entre si, cosa que es imposible de graficar ya que no podemos concebir la trayectoria en la que las rectas viajarían. Insertar un cubo dentro de otro no cambia las dimensiones en las que se encuentra.
arzolezzi08 4 weeks ago
ahh so erotic........
JockerNo7 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
bidyutmuk 1 month ago
BEEEAAAASSSSTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jonathanartman 1 month ago
@jojoateyt of course not it's just an idea of wat it looks like in a shadow, the object looks impossilbe DUH
Missydiva4 1 month ago
WOW, I was trying to understand what the fouth dimension would look like as a cube. now im just MIND FUCKED...
but cool vid though.
shercoogsherco 1 month ago
4d is not just dimension, its a state of mind
djr3000 1 month ago
@djr3000 I understand it is not the fourth.But fifth dimension certainly is state of mind which clearly envision the space respective to each subordinate coordinate displayed in their respective fields of function.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
But where my arguments with Mr 77GSlinger are missing.?..??
alkagrawala 1 month ago
it's a neat animation. but it's as close to the fourth dimension as milk is to jogging.
ThatsTooSmall 1 month ago 25
@ThatsTooSmall One excellent comment.Iliked this.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
@ThatsTooSmall I say its very close to the fourth dimension, it moves true time and therefore has 4 dimensions
jvkstudios 4 days ago
@jvkstudios well shit. if that's the case, then every video is an example of the fourth dimension.
next!
ThatsTooSmall 3 days ago
Wrong.
1D - length
2D - length and width
3D - length, width and depth
This is stil 3D.
As we are all beings of the 3D you can imagine 4D as our past and present. as much as 2D creatures cannot see anything in 3D, 3D creatures cant see anything before and after our present!
RoanRahl 1 month ago
@RoanRahl Yes, it is 3D, but it is a 3D shadow of a 4D shape. :P Beat that!
Utopastoo 1 month ago
My eyes are bleeding
Kofister 1 month ago
Fractal expansion=4D. Time is an axis (vector)
elyaye 1 month ago
Folks is always strugglin to describe 4D... sine wave/spiral! That's it
elyaye 1 month ago
@elyaye Sounds nice but i need to study Trignometry to understand it.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
Trying to explain 4D on a 2D screen
RectalSpoonNinja 1 month ago
Someone has just to find out wheres the 4. axis, then everything is easy to find out... (i think xD)
BattlestarGaming 1 month ago
@BattlestarGaming 4.axis is same as that of three known spatial dimension's.However axis of Time is different,if it is taken to be considered as to be an independent spatial dimension.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
4D is being ability to see whole universe cumulatively in single 3D model.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
The concept of a 4D cube is exciting, really. Sure, we would never be able to comprehend such a concept, but the idea is a cool one. To compare it, look up the concept of a flatland. Interesting shit.
heatran1919 1 month ago
There is no such thing as a 4d cube in our dimension... This is just two connected cubes... WE only can view 3D objects in our dimension...
TC1dude 1 month ago
4D is being able to see every surface of one object at a time
DanRickardo 1 month ago 19
@DanRickardo yes, and intertwining!
Zap525 1 month ago
@DanRickardo I think this is not correct.You can spec simultaneously all the faces of a diamond.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
@DanRickardo What about a glass box?
MMAGRO1 1 month ago
@DanRickardo mind blowing.
QofLife69 4 weeks ago
@DanRickardo every surface of a 3d object, not a four dimensional one
bluewisdomtriforce 3 weeks ago
@DanRickardo technically, you can see every surface at one time, because its transparent.
But I get what youre saying mate ;)
StrawberryDonutKing 3 weeks ago
thats a moving cube. i hate when scientists think they can explain the fourth dimension. if you can't explain the third dimension in the second dimension, you can't explain the 4th in the 3rd
Jojoateyt 1 month ago 16
@Jojoateyt You can project a 3D object onto a 2D surface. Likewise, you can "project" a 4D object into 3D space. In this video, you see a 3D projection, or "shadow", of a rotating 4D cube.
maksphoto78 1 month ago
@maksphoto78 But you cant understand it in the 2D. Then again... we dont really understand this. So. I get it now.
Jojoateyt 1 month ago
@Jojoateyt But You Can. I'ts just very hard to do so
Cha0sPr0ductions 1 month ago
@Jojoateyt Yes. Just as a cube's shadow is a quadrilateral, a tesseract's shadow is a cube.
fingerboy18 1 month ago
@fingerboy18 A shadow cannot be four diamesional,but matters do.(!)
alkagrawala 1 month ago
@alkagrawala You are correct. I was over-simplifying things.
fingerboy18 1 month ago
Comment removed
ThinkofBBB 1 month ago
@Jojoateyt A dimension is simply a vector space at right angles to the others. I can move in one dimension if I like, or up/down left/right. Since they are orthogonal. they are considered separate dimensions. The 4th dimension is a physical, just as physical as length, dimension of time. Our reality is a sliver of a larger 4-d object which contains all states of our reality, past present and future. We CAN visualize higher dimensions and also use them for understanding reality!
QuantumChance 1 month ago
@Jojoateyt That's why we call it a visualization.
biggiedickson 1 month ago
@Jojoateyt Thing of it this way: When you draw a 3d cube on a piece of paper, its 2d, but looks 3d. here is a 3d that looks 4d.
pooperfaceman 1 month ago
@Jojoateyt you can project 4D into 3D... and get cool images like this... if A scientist talks about 4D though, it's usually in mathematical terms, which is more than suitable for describing 4D, or any nD.
PreyingMantisMan 1 month ago
Comment removed
bidyutmuk 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jojoateyt Actually,you CAN explain 3D on a 2D.You can even Visualize it.
Think about it.If a 3D cube is rotated on your 2D TV screen, a 3D figure is automatically percepted by your brain.The same applies to a higher dimension.With the help of motion (rotating), you CAN visualize a 4D cube,provided,you rotate it on a 3D plane.That's the reason videos are useless, when it comes to help us visualize 4D Hypercubes. You need to rotate the stuff in real 3D world, not on a screen, which is only 2D.
bidyutmuk 1 month ago
@Jojoateyt You can explain a view of the 3D object in 2D space i.e. front view, side view etc. Similarly you can see one view of a 4D object in 3D space (or 2D space + time). Viewing in True N-dimensional space (N>3) is probably impossible since 1) our minds aren't designed for it 2) it's existence in the macro levels is unproven (string theories extra dimensions are at the sub-sub atomic level)
siddharthshetye 4 weeks ago
@Jojoateyt Just like you pointed out, the video can only show perspectives of the tesseract, it would be impossible to show the trajectory of a 4th dimensional axis. People have to stop trying to find it and comprehend WHY it's impossible.
arzolezzi08 4 weeks ago
@Jojoateyt While I agree with you here, things like this aren't explanations. Their representations. Just like how a drawing of a cube isn't an explanation for a three-dimensional model, it's just something that represents it.
TheGreatSynan 3 weeks ago
i think i'm the only one who understands how this works :/
maipieq 1 month ago
@maipieq not really, havnt u read the coments. u think every1s stupid?
hweera1 1 month ago
@hweera1 Well, considering you can't even spell "you" correctly or have any form of grammar...
maipieq 1 month ago
@maipieq so you're calling me stupid, plus what has grammer got to do with this video. anyways all im saying is that your not the only one who understands it :)
hweera1 1 month ago
@hweera1 > said everyone isn't stupid
> Failed to use grammar
> I understood the first time
maipieq 1 month ago
@maipieq i actually don't care anymore
hweera1 1 month ago
@maipieq I don't think grammar really matters on the internet.
btw, you need a full-stop and a capital "S".
swintona95 1 month ago
@swintona95 well, there is normal internet grammar (capitals and periods not always needed) and then there's just not giving a fuck (HOW R U 2DAY ?).
maipieq 1 month ago
it is a type of 4d objet, its called a rotating tesseract....
narram246 1 month ago
watch carl sagen talkin about this figure :o he taught me (as some people already commented) that this is what the shadow of this 4d object looks like...or something crazy like that
Timmycakes88 1 month ago
This isn't 4d! wtf!
bankaikun94 1 month ago
@bankaikun94 ITS a 3rd dimensional shadow of a 4th dimensional object.... when you draw a cube on paper you made a 2nd dimensional shadow of a 3rd dimensional object.... simple as that
TigerMeet2142 1 month ago
Um if its a 4d cube? then how come we can see it o_o...
Lolguy1336 1 month ago
Not the fourth dimension, this is just an illusion.
benblue3 1 month ago
This is a 3d shadow of a 4th dimensional object.
DevasionX 1 month ago
IT HURTS IT HURTS SO MUCHIBHAWKUBIOBW
TheKatamariguy 1 month ago
For every idiot who is commenting to my comment ''I don't fucking get it'' please stop. I can make one my own in 2d version plus we from the 3D world don't get the 4th dimention, which is why I made the comment in the first place. And I wanted thumbs up without asking for it.
TheBlackeyegalaxy 1 month ago
Pretty awesome!!
goodthaigals 1 month ago
Choose one edge and keep your eye on it - it really feels like something cutting the 3d space.
Alchevskaya 1 month ago
sorry guys, but it's confirmed the fourth dimension is time, not another movie resolution.
blisslen 1 month ago
@blisslen ,Time itself is two dimensional.The present of time is a reaction phase between between future 'n past
alkagrawala 1 month ago
0d is pretty much a point, you cant travel in any direction. 1d is a line in which you can only travel in 2 directions, left and right. 2d consists of length ah and width, in which you can travel left, right, forward and backward. 3d consists of length, width and height, in which you can travel left, right, up, down, forward and backwards. 4d is the same as 3d, except with an added axis, the 4d axis. this is called time. so my guesses are that if you time travel u become 4d.
VBEducation1 1 month ago
@VBEducation1 Shadow itself is space extension of mother 3d object,joining to it on 4d axis,in an euclidean spate,distinguished from three spates,the mother body is distributed into.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
he simply turned inside, where there 4D))?
Charlatans!
Maxologic 2 months ago
time travel
cH33zewarri0r 2 months ago
@cH33zewarri0r Indeed, reminds me of time travel
theInfamous3 1 month ago
great model
Rin8Kin 2 months ago
A tesseract is a 4d cube. for a square, one line connects to 2 other lines, for a cube, one square connects to 4 of them and in this video the cube inside a cube makes 6 other cubes around there just not cube looking since we cant view the 4th dimension. one cube connects to 6 other cubes for a 4d cube. if a 2d being grew eyes in the 3d world and looked through a seethrough cube hovering above, it'll see a square in a square with the vertexes connected, just like the cube in a cube connect(4d).
ratchetman4 2 months ago
Im gonna sound like a real nerd but this is how it works. 0D is a dot with no space, 1D is a line and is tecnically a measurement, a square is a 2D object created by the x axis and the y axis which has four 1D objects(four lines) to create it, a cube is a 3D object created by the x,y and z axis which has 6 2D objects(6 squares) to create it. Theres a pattern in this, 2 dots for a line(1d) 4 lines for a square(2d) 6 squares for a cube(3d) so im thinking 8 cubes for a Tesseract? YES! count them.
ratchetman4 2 months ago
@ratchetman4 0d is not merely a dot with no space,it is a wormhole wherethrough all the four dimensions reduces into the fifth one.But the question still exists as to what is the fourth one.??
alkagrawala 1 month ago
O.o well so much for being the smartest kid in my school. I CANT FIGURE THIS OUT DAMN IT
sethhero 2 months ago
i get it.....no im joking all i see is the inside becoming the outside....and then becoming the inside again.....king've like the water has it's natural recycling system..
lollypopmanlol 2 months ago
Xzibit would love this.
QWERTYCommander 2 months ago
It's like watching six cubes rotating at the same time while they all rotate around a cube space!
MacraStraba 2 months ago
Hey! Don't lie on me. Our screen is flat, it's definitely 2d! *trollface*
a20365354 2 months ago
Comment removed
XtremeLetsPlay 2 months ago
This Is'nt 4D.
XtremeLetsPlay 2 months ago
Bullshit
apocolypse11 2 months ago
This s a 3d construct and explanable with out an extra dimension. I fail to see how a cube enfolding upon itself proves the theory of a 4th dimenson. The first 3 dimensions are mutually orthogonal, it is physically impossible to add another 90 degree plane to the other three. Time is not a dimension, it is the measure of motion of all 3 dimensions simulteaneously in our Universe. So, where is this mythematical egghead postulated extra dimension? Anyone want to try to explain this to me?
77GSlinger 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@77GSlinger Good points.
gr8vibes2 2 months ago
@77GSlinger We cannot experience more than 3 dimensions. This however does not mean 3 is the limit of possible dimensions, it's just the limit of dimensions we exist in.
For a simple example, try explaining the concept of up and down to a 2d object.
The 4th dimension is just another direction, like up and down, back and forth etc.
We just can't imagine this fourth direction of movement since our universe only supports 3.
TLDR: 4 dimensions exist, just not in our Universe.
Hendurik 2 months ago
@Hendurik Thank you for your explanation!
If the 4th dimension does not exist in our Universe of what value is it to us and why should we waste any time thinking about it? What I mean is of what Practical value is it to us?
77GSlinger 2 months ago
@77GSlinger Well studying it provides a better understanding of how our universe works, for example how the universe can be infinite yet contain a finite amount of energy and matter.
Exploring that which we cannot see a reason to explore is how breakthroughs are made!
Hendurik 2 months ago
@Hendurik If the Universe is infinite, how can it contain a finite amount of energy and matter? This is a glaring contradiction! And, how would a 4d cube prove that an infinite Universe has a finite amount of energy and matter. I fail to see the connection between the two. Thank you for your time and explaining the academic reasons attributed to this strange so-called 4d cube which appears to be only a 3d cube with some fancy animated enfolding technique to confuse the viewer!
77GSlinger 2 months ago
@77GSlinger If you watch a 3d object such as a cube rotating on your computer screen you'll still be able to percieve that it has 3 dimensions, even though it's projected in 2 dimensions on the screen. The reason behind this is that when the cube rotates you'll see the cube from different angles. The theory then, is that if you take a 3d model of a 4d object such as a tesseract and rotate it, you'll see a projection of the 4d.
At least that's the theory.
Hendurik 2 months ago
@77GSlinger I really don't have enough space in a youtube comment to explain the infinite universe - finite energy thing. If you're curious I could write you a PM about it instead :)
Hendurik 2 months ago
@Hendurik Ok, sounds real good, if you have the time to spare!
77GSlinger 2 months ago
@Hendurik We can experience Dimensions up to 8.But can not give em a mathematics to dimensions beyond the fourth one.The fact is that the whole 3d universe is observed & experienced in 4Th dimensional canvass.Take it in mind that 4Th d is not suggestive of a mega structuring device,but contrary to it,4Th dimension is reductive stage and whole universe with all its qualitative as well as qualitative properties intact can begot in a tennis boll size sphere.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
@77GSlinger Our brains do not understand 4 dimensions, so this how we see it moving instead.
Lolocaust41 2 months ago
@Lolocaust41 Yeah I know, but I still don't get it and this animation does not prove there is a 4d, ts just a cube within a cube enfolding upon itself.
77GSlinger 2 months ago
@77GSlinger When a single line is extended beyond infinity,it reduces into fourth dimension,just becoming orthogonal to mother point at 180 degree perpendicular round the polar circumferance of such sphere point.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
@alkagrawala Beyond infinity? I am 100% sure you could never prove this. So what is your point?
77GSlinger 1 month ago
@77GSlinger What do you think of angular deviation in a light beam just coming down from infinity,enters into a transparent medium.Can you explain me what this angular deviation represent to!
I agree you in point,it is really very difficult to prove the point i have raised above,but not quite impossible.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
@alkagrawala The language translator you are using does not state the question you are asking in a clear manner. Angular deviation of light beam coming down from infinity? Angular deviation? There are no "light beams" in Nature, there are only electrically simulated light waves.
"Can you explain me what this angular deviation represent to"
This is unintelligible. I have no idea what you are asking here. Are you talking about light entering our atmosphere from space? it's angle????
77GSlinger 1 month ago
@77GSlinger I understand the three coordinates do not cover the whole space within its rotational ambit.Some space still leaves behind to be taken into account.The question is where it hides behind ! I understand the space in between the lines of deviation at point O upon the interphase is space of fourth spatial dimention and is as such measurable in its degrees of rotation.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
@alkagrawala a beam of light (at one specific freq/radiation) is the only thing we can truly call 1D. Infinite and fixed. most others we know of are 4D n' 3D
elyaye 1 month ago 7
@elyaye Nice.Thanks for your advice.But this phenomenon will become quite important on moment i will be finding a possibility of getting through a wormhole.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
@77GSlinger When a beam of light at this end of Universe can undergo deviational regression,why a number line cannot undergo the same at destination infinity.
I withdraw the word 'Beyond' from my definition above,with intention to make the matter more persistent relevant to immediate issue in discussion.The word beyond may please be deemed deleted from onwards.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
@alkagrawala Ok, deleting the word beyond infinity removes the redundancy, however, you still can never prove your claim since it is physically unverifiable. It is just an arm chair theory you have created to satisfy your own musing on the subject. It does not prove a 4th dimension.
77GSlinger 1 month ago
4D is time travel
labmonkey398 2 months ago
@labmonkey398 no it definitely is not
Hendurik 2 months ago
@Hendurik what makes you say that
labmonkey398 2 months ago
The concepts of a 4D object would end up in theory that this is a black hole.
alphadog9876543210 2 months ago
@alphadog9876543210 You may be correct,but existing three coordinate theory does not suggest to relegate its axis to core of black hole.
alkagrawala 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well, a 3D cube has length, width, and depth. A 4D cube has length, width, depth and "?". What is "?"?
Antichrist501 2 months ago
Comment removed
XtremeLetsPlay 3 months ago 2
@XtremeLetsPlay in mathematic time isn't a dimension since it doesn't have an anti one
haukzi 3 months ago
@haukzi
In fact, this thing in the Video is 3D.
XtremeLetsPlay 3 months ago
@XtremeLetsPlay This is an exercise in abstract math. Timespace theory is merely an application of it in physics. The video is a perspective projection of a rotating tesseract. A tesseract is a mathematical construct, an analog of a cube that requires a 4-dimensional Euclidean topology to exist. Time is irrelevant to the context.
FluffyBunniesOnFire 2 months ago 2
@XtremeLetsPlay wrong time is just a part of the 4d exactly like its a part of the 3d..time its not a dimention..in 4d you dont have time..time its endless..
adirockboy 2 months ago
@adirockboy time isn't endless, it never is not even in 10 dimensions, it will stop as soon as this universe collapses
keissetje 2 months ago
@keissetje Will all of the universes collapse together.!
alkagrawala 1 month ago
@adirockboy ...and the space is endless too !!
alkagrawala 1 month ago
@XtremeLetsPlay wrong
Hendurik 2 months ago
inception......
jwspartan8 3 months ago
The fourth dimention is time. Not smell, not impossible and not this shit.
MrSmileyThe 3 months ago
@MrSmileyThe Stupid... /watch?v=uDaKzQNlMFw
sander945 3 months ago
@MrSmileyThe actually there are 12 dimensions 11 spacial and one time. so this is the forth spacial dimension. technically you can place time anywhere you want in the list but it is most logically the 12th because all spacial dimensions have direct correlation to the rest of the spacial dimensions where as time dos not.
pieindustriesinco 3 months ago
nope, the forth "D" is sent, like smell
XinoBrix 3 months ago
To think...
A one dimentional cube is a line
To get a two dimentional cube, or a square, you translate it and join the vertices.
To get a 3 dimentional cube you again translate the square and join the vertices. For a 4 dimentional cube...
Jontrogl 3 months ago
@Jontrogl you are so right!!!
Plus a 3d cube is made up of '6' 2d squares which are made up of '4' 2d lines...
So a 4d cube would be made up of... '8' 3d cubes and that is what this is!!!
There is a cube in the middle a cube on the left of the middle cube a cube on the right of the middle cube on above one bellow one in front and one behind it... and the 8th cube which is around all the other cubes!!!
This video shows how all the cubes can move within each other and can go to the center!! :D
RandomDirectors 3 months ago
@RandomDirectors Correct, except that the cubes are never actually inside of each other. The cubes make up the surface of the object, meet each other at right angles, and are all equidistant from the actual center.
FluffyBunniesOnFire 2 months ago
the inner part stretches out and expands whilst the lower part decreases it size and then the bigger part overlaps the smaller one and the process repeats.
skullhacker100 3 months ago
I may be wrong. but I'd still call that 3-D for the fourth dimention is time
woodythewoodchuck1 3 months ago
the metaseismological constant of the neuropsychometric equation indicates that thephotosynthetic quadriplinnion is transdecalocomating
priyochatterjee1 3 months ago
I don't fucking get it.
TheBlackeyegalaxy 3 months ago 34
@TheBlackeyegalaxy this figure is flat...not 4d or 3d...but if u had it in real life...no matter where u look at it...u will always see 3 dimensions unlike a regular 3d cube or figure..basicly creating a 4d figure
zoodini 2 months ago
@zoodini Zoodini, you sound like a smart guy, I only wrote that comment to get thumbs up. It is a Flat figure meant to be 2D in a 3 D world rottating in 4 D which I cannot understand cause I am so used to the 3D. Seeing a 4D figure in a 2D screen / thing on a 3D world isn't gonna help us much understanding, even making the figure itself in real life like we can rotate it with our own hands is hard to understand it. I am not dumb, just wanted to get sum thumbs up ;)
TheBlackeyegalaxy 2 months ago
Draw a square. Then draw four more squares, each sharing an edge with the first. Draw one last square sharing any of the outside edges with one of the four squares. You can now take this flat image, cut it out, and fold it along the edges to create a cube.
Now take a cube. Attach another cube to each of its 6 faces, and attach one more to any of the outermost faces. In the same manner you folded the squares in 3D to create a cube, the 8 cubes can be folded in 4D to create a tesseract (4d cube)
VechtMalthos 1 month ago
@VechtMalthos I know. It was just a comment to get thumbs up, I could draw this cube in 2D when I was 13 even. And no, I do not understand the forth dimention.
TheBlackeyegalaxy 1 month ago
i'm in the nerdy side of youtube again
raypl0xer 3 months ago 29
@raypl0xer by nerdy you mean educated, intelligent, etc?
Green01123Gold 2 months ago