Added: 2 years ago
From: ketchupTV
Views: 13,324
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • In the past Sony was good but now...

    Yeah i´m Canikon Fanboy =)

  • its funny to see how much energy people use to break down other peoples preference of camera....i bought my a550 becaus i wanted a not uber expensive slr camera good enough for sports and if i want to take pictures of anything els i just use my zeiss lens :D .i.. (@canikonfanboys)

  • A550

    Good for:

    Sports shooters on a budget, gadget lovers, upgraders wanting the SLR experience without a steep learning curve.

    Not so good for:

    Anyone else

    Source: dpreview

  • @parabellumantonio trollin' 

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • =( i was sony user (3 sony cameras), but the quality of his products.....

    now i`m canon DSLR user =) WOW!!!

  • parabellumantonio is clearly a CaNikonboy...

  • @Penzox21 i agree, they are insecure about there purchase like alot of fanboys and they wish to troll the interweb making pointless comments to make them feel better!

  • The A550 is a big cybershot, Sony don´t know what a DSLR is. DSLR is not a handycam,

    DSLR are technique and art, not point and shot.

  • haha, that's the most stupid comment i've seen in a while!, you obviously have no clue about what photography is all about!

  • Read: Dpreview.

    Review -> Sony A550 ->Conclusion

  • don't have too, everyone knows dpreview don't like sony, so they are not objective. Besides I've used A380 myself, tiltable live-view opens up a whole new world opportunities like discrete shooting, and all kinds of angles comfortable. There is a reason why every other magazine praises Sony's live view, and other camerabrands introducing tilt lcd too.

  • Well, sony is a good electronic camera, but, if you need only and always a fantastic LCD, buy a Cybershoot.

    If you need a DSLR buy a Nikon, Canon, Sigma, Pentax etc.

  • @parabellumantonio i prefer the cameralab review....Sony’s also done its homework and unlike some cameras which simply jump on the bandwagon of fashionable features, the Alpha A550 and its more affordable sibling, the A500, actually target a genuine desire of many photographers. In a word: speed.....

  • @parabellumantonio i dont see why u have to post the same thing on a whole bunch of other a550 videos.

    u clearly dont know what a dslr is if u think this is a big cybershot

  • @sonyalphamale

    If you need always that "wonderful" LCD buy a Cybershot, if you need Optical viefinder buy a Canon, Nikon, Sigma etc.

    The place for Sony is in mirrorless cameras.

  • @parabellumantonio that doesnt really go with what im saying but okay =S

    i see ur just a canon fanboy but i still find it a bit sad how u need to go on a whole heap of sony videos and copy and paste the same thing.

  • @parabellumantonio actually a DSLR is a camera mainly used by hobbyists and professionals.

    photography is about technique and art. oh and the point you make about a DSLR is not a handycam. i'll think you'll find that sony are (strangely?) the only one out of the big three that havent introduced video on there DSLR's.

  • @phototechluke When they do put video on there cameras I have high hopes that they will do really well. AVCHD and tons of other stuff like.

  • @phototechluke dude, Pentax, Nikon Canon and then the lousy Sony and then the even worse Samsung.

    I just don't see why a electronics manufacturer gets it's nose into buisiness that is based on precision and the dedicated love of making Lenses and not like sony a massproducer of almost everything that has a curcuit. Next they will be building satalites...

    Do you guys even have real lenses that own in quality? You can have all the so good camera, without a lens it's useless...

  • @FIGHTTHECABLE

    well being a professional photographer i chose sony because it has something that nikon and canon or any other brand has...ziess.

  • @phototechluke okay, now thats just bullshitting me....Carl Zeiss Lenses is just a brand name. It doesn't make the Lenses any better.

  • @FIGHTTHECABLE

    well considering ziess are a legendary lens manufacturer compared to canon and nikon it makes a world of difference. think of it this way, a nikon lens is the old 1980's banger and the ziess is a brand new porsche 911, both are cars however the porsche is much better naturally compared to the old banger, oh and not to cause a war but im not trying to insult nikon im just quoting a nikon lens.

  • @phototechluke Well i guess that is your opinion. A Camera and it's lens is in the end only as good as the photographer itself. And comparing Lenses with Cars? ^^

    Lenses cost more the older they are, they don't get cheaper.

    It's Carl Zeiss by the way not Ziess.

  • @FIGHTTHECABLE

    actually its an analogy the whole cars thing. oh and the Zeiss branding correction is debatable because both are accepted however it's normally referred to as Zeiss because Carl Zeiss was the original founder.

  • @phototechluke wel actualy they have nikon and canon mounts.....just no autofocus support

    (i own a alpha550 and i have a cheap little zeiss lens.... and i love it)

  • @parabellumantonio

    FYI sony is now what used to be Minolta...

  • personally, I like the exterior look of the first generation alphas better.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more