Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Some of these photos remind of the those taken by Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky at the start of the XXth century. He made colored photos of people and places from all over the former Empire, also old Russian cities, and they look like modern photos.

  • Sublime!

  • ОЧЕРЕДНАЯ ГОРДОСТЬ ЗА НАШ ВЕЛИКИЙ ГОРОД,АВТОРУ СПАСИБО..

  • Russian Slavs are not native to Russia - in fact Russian Slavs are not native anywhere

  • @majorgeeek fuck off trolley

  • @srboslav92 original settlement of Novgorod was not Slavic - Novgorod originally did not belong to Russia since Russia did not even exist in medieval Rus - Novgorod made alliances with Lithuania in order to stay separate from Moscow - it took several battles and 30,000 dead Novgorodians before Moscow was able to annex Novgorod - so much for its original Russian status?????

  • @majorgeeek see, you're troll :)

  • @srboslav92 and you are some sort of moronic random word generator too stupid to warrant a sensible reply

  • @majorgeeek theres no sensible replys with trolleys! <3 :D

  • @srboslav92 a trolley is a cart and a troll is a Swiss ogre - and <3:D what's that? your IQ??? - "no sensible reply"??? you mean you have no sensible reply -

  • the video - watch?v=6efCTD9qQxs - these are not ethnic Russians - these are European Russians with Slav - Balt genes - feel the difference - Slavic Russians are not native to Russia

  • The Slavic tribes of Sloven lived around Novgorod and Kriviches around Pskov.

    The founder of the Russian State - Varangian leader of Rus' RURIK sat in STARAYA LADOGA .

    In 862 AD he made NOVGOROD his capital. Then in 882 AD his successor Oleg the Prophet came to Kiev with the infant son of Rurik Igor and made it his capital proclaiming it to be "The mother of Russian Cities" (metropolis).

    This is how the RUSSIAN STATE was found.

    All Russian Princes and Tzars until 17c were Rurik Dynasty.

  • Kiev was a RUSSIAN CITY since 882AD. In 1240 it fell to Mongols and was destroyed. The lands around Kiev were devastated. Slavic population moved up to Northern Rus where other Russian cities were by the time more important and more developed centers, clergy as well.The see was transferred by Metropolitan Maximus to Vladimir in 1299 and his successor Metropolitan Peter moved the residence to Moscow in 1325. After the Mongol Pogrom lands around Kiev were empty for decades ahead.

  • Different Tatar and Turkic colonists settled on the emptied South Russian lands.

    There has been NOTHING "Ukrainian" in Ancient Rus. No "Ukrainian" Princes and no "Ukrainian" Church.

    Kiev was annexed by Lithuanian and Polish rulers and it is in the 17th C the territories became known as "Ukrajna" - border territories of Polish Kingdom with the Wild Field.

  • There simply was no such ETHNONYM "Ukrainians" until the 19th century...Otherwise give me just ONE example.Through centuries Ukraine had only GEOGRAPHICAL meaning of the border territories of Russia and Poland.

    It is only in 19th century the ethnonym "Ukrainians" was invented by anti-Tzar Polish Revolutionaries then this fake "Ukrainain" ethnic identity was developed in Galicia - the province of Austrian Empire. read about the genocide of Rusian popilation of Galicia in Wikipedia (TALERHOF).

  • "Ukrainization" was carried out by Bolshevik government according to Lenin's principle of "The right of Nations to Self-Determination". As if illiterate peasants of Little Russia had nothing else to do then "self-determine" themselves as "Ukrainians" they never heard of...

  • "Ukrainization has been and will be enforced with most decisive measures. Whoever does not understand or does not want to understand cannot be considered by the Government anything other than a Counterrevolutionary and conscious or unconscious enemy of the Soviet Power"

    Mykola Skrypnyk - Ukrainian Bolshevik leader, proponent of the Ukrainian Republic's independence and Ukrainization, one of creators of standard Ukrainian orthography.

    Worked for CHEKA (Wiki), famous for his sadistic methods.

  • Find me a SINGLE example of ANYONE being called "a Ukrainian" prior to 19th century...

  • Kiev - one of the Ancient capitals of Russia being now the capital of the country of Ukraine existing since 1991 is like Istanbul (that was once Constantinople and the capital of Byzantine Empire) is in Turkey...

    Speaking of Christianity , Olga of Kiev who ruled Rus as a regent in 945-963 is said to be the first Rus ruler to convert to Christianity. She was born in PSKOV. (Wiki Pskov and look where that is). She was the wife of Igor whom Oleg brought with him from NOVGOROD.

  • "The oldest, Rurik, located himself in Novgorod; the second, Sinaeus, in Beloozero; and the third, Truvor, in Izborsk. On account of these Varangians, the district of Novgorod became known as Russian land. The Slavs." (Wiki: "Russian Primary Chronicle" or "The Tale of Bygone Years")

    Also Wiki: STARAYA LADOGA, NOVGOROD, OLEG THE PROPHET, RUS'.

  • This where the Russian Land comes from:

    watch?v=IapsU220zn0

    Novgorod is UNINTERRUPTEDLY Russian city for more than 1000 years.

    It is from Novgorod Oleg the Prophet came to Kiev and made it new capital of Rus.

  • From the Primary Chronicle:

    "Within two years, Sineus and his brother Truvor died. Rurik gathered sole authority into his own hands, [he gave] Polotsk to one [of his men], Rostov to another, and to another Beloozero. The Varangians in these cities are colonists, but the first settlers in Novgorod were Slovenes; in Polotsk, Krivichians; in Beloozero, Ves’; in Rostov, Merians; and in Murom, Muromians. Rurik had dominion over all these folk."

  • @DrMundo74 Novgorod is not Russian - in fact Novgorodians joined with Lithuanian 14-15C for protection from hegemonic Moscovian Dukes - Novgorod was later annexed by Russia under force of arms - this sort of history hardly qualitifes Novgorod as having "Uninterrupted Russian City" - Novgorodians should think about orange revolution

  • @majorgeeek you should consider putting yourself into a mental asylum

  • Novgorod was originally settled by the Finns before the invasions of the Slavs - in fact the Slavs which are native to Dnipro heart;land are not native to Russia

  • @majorgeeek SLOVENE lived in Novgorod you moron, ILMEN SLOVENS

  • @DrMundo74 Slovenes live in Slovenia down near the Balkans - Archeological digs in Novgorod indicate earliest human settlement occurred 10C putting to myth much of your Russian King Dick of the Slav theory - Novgorod was originally a Norse and Finn settlement - the Slavs which arrived later are not native to this region

  • @majorgeeek Open Wikipedia and read "Ilmen Slavs"

  • @DrMundo74 Ilmen Slavs are not Slovenes - Slovenes did not live in Novgorod - there is no evidence that Ilman Slavs are native in these regions in fact Wiki supports the notion the Slavs migrated north into regions inhabited by native dwellers such as the Finns - Slavs are not native to Russia only Ukraine, Poland and Belarus maybe even Czechoslovakia and east of Germany as Germans share Ra1 and R1b in roughly even proportions

  • @majorgeeek LOL!!!!!

    compare:

    watch?v=Bx0t_xjN-sA&feature=re­lated watch?v=Vfg2bJIe_1w

    watch?v=H6igfmY5Dww

    AND:

    watch?v=6efCTD9qQxs

    Feel the difference, turk?

    

  • @majorgeeek xaxaxax, Russians aren't trying to be "king dicks" of the Slavs. They ARE Slavs. There is no real thing like a Russian, a Ukrainian, a Pollack, a Finn...there is only one name- Slav. The names are only meant to distinguish region and family kinship. You like to be a dick though. ;)

  • @RussianStarchild Finns are not Slavic - the majority of Russians are not Slavs in fact Russian Slavs are not native to Russia or Ukraine and Belarus - you lack in understanding of basic history - you must be slow learner

  • Comment removed

  • Вы смешны))) вы хоть разнообразьте ассортимент заготовленных ответов.Всё одно и тоже,коммунисты,кпсс,нквд и прочий бред.Только вот не пойму как Новгород и заселение славянами земель новгородских связанно с коммунизмом?Вы глупее чем я думал!Ну коль нечего вразумительного вы ответить не можете,напишите ещё что нибудь,мы хоть посмеёмся!)Вы настолько грубо работаете,что вас даже не нужно выводить на чистую воду,вы сами показываете всем кто вы есть на самом деле)Ответе,сколько вам платят за тролинг?

  • @majorgeeek Ваши обрывистые,невнятные комментарии говорят лишь об одном,что вам просто нечего ответить!!! Так-что оставьте свою ересь при себе и не выставляйте свою безграмотность на всеобщую потеху.

  • @majorgeeek Еслс вы неспособны мыслить и отвечать здраво,научно обоснованно то не пишите ереси коя рождена в вашем больном-воспалённом воображение и более не где.Все ваши национал зап.Украинсие теории мы проходили и не раз,они все не выдерживают даже мало майской критики.Вы очередной шут и клоун из цирка под названиям зап.Украина и это как не печально уже не шутка а диагноз.

  • @199leg your comments are too stupid to warrant a sensible response - keep trying

  • Очередная не чем не подтверждённая ложь и гнусность из уст не компетентного человека.Ответе мне чем плохи советские антропологические исследования,их точность подтверждена не раз,это и российские ученые и эстонские и даже американо-британские генетические исследования 2007г подтвердили высокий уровень проведенной работы.Назовите мне хоть одно нарушения регламента проведённых работ?на это как всегда вы не ответите не чего вразумительного,ваша ОТГОВОРКА одна,они плохи потому-что советские!

  • @majorgeeek Так же для начала,ознакомьтесь с антропологические исследования Института этнографии АН СССР(1955-1959 гг.) и АН УРСР (1956-1963 гг.).Думаю вы с легкостью сможете найти эти материалы на страницах интернета.

  • @199leg you don't seriously expect the free world to accept your old Soviet propaganda borsch??? - you need your head examined for serious soviet contamination of outdated ideology - your Russian slavs are not natives in Russia therefore you cannot point your fingers at your neighbours - look at yourselves before you begin to rubbish other countries

  • Novgorod was originally Finn settlement and later Vikings also setteld there - the Slavs are not native to this region - in fact Russian Slavs are not native to Russia

  • @majorgeeek Вы обычный троль,вы зря думаете что к вашей больной фантазии,кто-то из нормальных людей может прислушаться.И перестаньте брызжать заготовленными шаблонами,они даже не вписываются в контекст моих вопросов.Думаю читателю этих комментариев уже понятно кто вы такой.Вы обычный проплаченый интернет троль,да и необразованный к тому-же хотя меж вашего брата это не редкость а повальная закономерность!

  • @199leg and you are a commie throw back from defunct soviet regime.....when Russia becomes more civilised and transparent guys like you will evaporate

  • @majorgeeek От чего вы молчите?или у вас закончились "стандарт шаблоны"?Ну ладно,давайте оставим генетику и антропологию и взглянем на историю!Основной древний источник о переселение славян после потопа это"Повесть временных лет"и там черным по белому написано,ЦИТИРУЮ:"Те же славяне, которые сели около озера Ильменя, назывались своим именем - славянами, и построили город, и назвали его Новгородом".Замечу,что племён"Чудь"там еще и в помине не было.Что вы на это скажете?Тоже коммунисты подстроили?

  • @199leg Novgorod is Finn settlement which was also Varangian or Swedish - the Slavs came later and took it over - Slavs are not native to Novgorod - the Rus Chronicles are mostly half forgery a bit like your communist bullshit

  • @majorgeeek Ну право, вы меня из рядно смешите))).Что вам не скажи и все у вас изменено,извращенно и подстроено)))).Почему вы не пишете по русски?с других аккаунтов вы пишите по русски и не плохо!Вы хоть знаете что такое "Повесть временных лет"и осознаёте её значимость для историков?Думаю что не знаете и не осознаете!Прочтите,это сильно повысит вашу образованность и обогатит вас историческими ФАКТАМИ.

  • @majorgeeek Обратитесь к материалам Академика Валентина Яшина он в своё время вёл курс лекций в нашем институте и как раз занимался архиологией Великого Новгорода,возглавляя это направления.

  • @199leg there is an abundance of historic fact which does not support but refutes your communist inspired ideology - Russians are not the king dicks of the Slavs you think you are

  • @199leg This majorgeeek is just a TROLL!

  • @DrMundo74 Это не просто троль,это троль на работе.

  • Now I know where I want to live!!! Wonderful!!! Spasebo bolshoi!!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more