Note Romney: Is Pro life look @ his record while he was govenor in Mass.He always voted pro-life in office. He also apolgized for changing his stance on abortion.
lol No. If he says he's personally pro life, meaning he believes that a fetus is "life" then protecting that would seem to be a job of the state.
I never said it WAS or was not life. The point is that if he said he was personally pro life but is "effectively pro choice" than he's being hypocritical. Rhetoric...isn't that what we are both partaking in? God bless.
It is very irresponsible of the those who made this to so drastically misrepresent his views on abortion by playing short sound bites. Yes Romney has changed his views...not on abortion but on what government's role should be regarding the issue. And even then he has only changed his view once, moving to the right side of the issue, which is pro-life. That technically is a flip, but not a flop. I for one welcome Romney and his political clout to the pro-life movement.
ummmm no...lol He just said " I believe an abortion should be safe and legal". It's hypocritical to say "Oh I'm personally pro life, but it's okay for YOU to kill a baby"
its actually not hypocritical to say, "my views aren't to be forced on others." if it is, as you say, then the whole constitution is hypocritical. be pro-life, but don't try to re-write truth to fit your argument.
no, even when it comes to life. because it is hypocritical for you to say that you allow me to practice a different religion than you, but then say that i have to share the same abortion belief system as you, just because.. and he said what he was refering to before he was in office, and when he was in he vetoed any abortion legislature.
I disagree. He is saying that I'm personally of the belief that a fetus is "life" and then turning around and letting people take life. That's not the pro choice position at all. That position is that it's a fetus, not a life, just a clump of cells. You're right...it's not hypocritical, If he believes it's LIFE, and then says go ahead and destroy it it's homicidal.
no there is no scientific patented conclusion on whether it is life or not, leaving it up to personal belief to decide whether its life or not; therefore, not a matter(in his opinion, 12 years ago) for the state to decide whether it is right or not. the state may only remain objective, so that it allows for personal subjectivity.. you like your rhetoric too much.
Fuck you GOPChoice. Romney 2012
malazt 1 year ago
Note Romney: Is Pro life look @ his record while he was govenor in Mass.He always voted pro-life in office. He also apolgized for changing his stance on abortion.
mydodgers1 4 years ago
Abortion is just one of Willard's flip-flops.
18 and counting.
Not only flip-flopping out of opportunism, but doing it state to state.
MKB2814 4 years ago 2
lol No. If he says he's personally pro life, meaning he believes that a fetus is "life" then protecting that would seem to be a job of the state.
I never said it WAS or was not life. The point is that if he said he was personally pro life but is "effectively pro choice" than he's being hypocritical. Rhetoric...isn't that what we are both partaking in? God bless.
spacekicker 4 years ago
Willard cited his own mother as inspiration for pro-choice views.
Now he throws her under the Winnebago
MKB2814 4 years ago
hahahah
spacekicker 4 years ago
It is very irresponsible of the those who made this to so drastically misrepresent his views on abortion by playing short sound bites. Yes Romney has changed his views...not on abortion but on what government's role should be regarding the issue. And even then he has only changed his view once, moving to the right side of the issue, which is pro-life. That technically is a flip, but not a flop. I for one welcome Romney and his political clout to the pro-life movement.
PlanetRomney 4 years ago
dude, what are your galactic coordinates? i need to get off this planet quick. ha... if only there was a planet romney.
keyan99 4 years ago
Mitt Romney has assumed more positions than a 42nd street hooker.
jewy 4 years ago
Romney has always been pro life. The change was in Romney's willingness to enforce his pro life beliefs on others.
moveoverdotorg 4 years ago
ummmm no...lol He just said " I believe an abortion should be safe and legal". It's hypocritical to say "Oh I'm personally pro life, but it's okay for YOU to kill a baby"
spacekicker 4 years ago
its actually not hypocritical to say, "my views aren't to be forced on others." if it is, as you say, then the whole constitution is hypocritical. be pro-life, but don't try to re-write truth to fit your argument.
keyan99 4 years ago
Not when it comes to life. Even last night he said that he was "effectively pro choice". doing nothing is often the same as doing something.
spacekicker 4 years ago
no, even when it comes to life. because it is hypocritical for you to say that you allow me to practice a different religion than you, but then say that i have to share the same abortion belief system as you, just because.. and he said what he was refering to before he was in office, and when he was in he vetoed any abortion legislature.
keyan99 4 years ago
I disagree. He is saying that I'm personally of the belief that a fetus is "life" and then turning around and letting people take life. That's not the pro choice position at all. That position is that it's a fetus, not a life, just a clump of cells. You're right...it's not hypocritical, If he believes it's LIFE, and then says go ahead and destroy it it's homicidal.
spacekicker 4 years ago
no there is no scientific patented conclusion on whether it is life or not, leaving it up to personal belief to decide whether its life or not; therefore, not a matter(in his opinion, 12 years ago) for the state to decide whether it is right or not. the state may only remain objective, so that it allows for personal subjectivity.. you like your rhetoric too much.
keyan99 4 years ago