@infinitesimotel there is two versions, American and european. This is cut from the American vesion. Or vice versa, any way I think they cut it cause it was too obvious to the subliminal story about what was really wrong with danny.
I was going to say that this is a case of over-analysis. However, I am going to agree with californiacamera. It can be interpreted as symbolic. It may, nevertheless, have been unintentional in some instances.
@DarkAmbient93 I've got them all mapped and timed. Every spin in The Shining is part of a broader subtextual language, and every one of them is choreographed, and intentional.
@MonsunFilmatorium I rather like the music. It is my old band from years back. I'm on the bass. The lyrics of all three songs track the Kubrick-action onscreen in a rather interesting fashion... I thought.
@shawnfella okay, I didn't know that. Keep up the good work on both theory side and music side. I think it's because I would have chosen something different, and reacted a bit of my standards- controversial. Have a continuing great night :D
@pyenapple - you're just worried in case he blows up your mask-face come hallowe'en. 'you wouldn't tell them all about our evil clubs would you stan?' yes.
spinning is how you time-travel without machines, Nexus article from late 90s about the original wingmakers material, before or same issue they published the Dr Anderson interviews, was from a guy describing how to time-travel by walking around in circles with objects from the time to go to - the likes of the Tzolkin calander shows how it can work, there's days which are the same colour&number and those days all align in the universe's toroid windings. so you go parallel & then along, 90 degrees
spinning is how you time-travel without machines, Nexus article from late 90s about the original wingmakers material, before or same issue they published the Dr Anderson interviews, was from a guy describing how to time-travel by walking around in circles with objects from the time to go to - the likes of the Tzolkin calander shows how it can work, there's days which are the same colour&number and those days all align in the universe's toroid windings. so you go parallel & then along, 90 degrees
Certainly, to know the future, understand the past. In all an underlying logical consequence, enforced or derived, patterns emerge out of chaos so choose wisely. Agree to Meaningful Coincidence? What came first, source or consequence, chicken or egg? Shining... close to Spinning, and in the preponderance of marked shots, People Looking Back. Jack on back through his past to another past and becomes it in the last shot. Tell, is Scatman's hotel the eye of HAL? Sight understands Colors too. REDRUM
@MrMerehuman Yes. color is very important in The Shining. It is vital to understand how color informs Kubrick's number codes, his sequence-span interrelationships, and most all of his timing, his alignments and his prescribed motion, and even his Sub Bears - are related to color. The Journey of Red is supported by 42. 42 is the number of degrees that the color red appears (relative to the observer's retina) in a RAINBOW. It's the mouth of the Bear that gushes. No one element means any one thing.
@shawnfella The color green is 39, for reasons that will soon be abundantly clear.
8 is the Bear, the id, the coincidence, the vessel, the subconscious. 11 is he Bird. the Rising Agent, the coupled pair, Recurring Calumet canisters are not about the Indian chief label as much as they are the feathers of his head dress. THE RISING AGENT. It fills The Shining.
9 (and its spun 6). are Kubrick, the elephant in the room.The yellow elephant.
The Shining is built around a color-number equation.
@shawnfella The numbers (in The Shining) are ranked upon their relationship to "spin. The "spin-able" numbers are 8, and 1, or 11. As well 88 (and any appropriate combination of these numbers such as 818, and so. These number morphologically survive a 180 degree spin.
Two other numbers are a special case, a binary spin pair, if you will. of 6 and 9. The only digit pairing where one becomes the other upon spin. 6 becomes 9 and vice versa..
118 and 119 are the "princes" of the number array. They are the Jacks. The left and right Bauer.
Shot 118 is Danny in the store room amid numbered boxes in a slow zoom that occurs while he goes into a Shining trance about to "receive" from Hallorann. Shot 119 is the Chef spinning his head 45 degrees to utter How'd you like some ice cream (eye scream) - while the word spin(ach) emerges from his "spine."
11 = "a leaven" (Calumet Baking powder) The Rising Agent. The leavening agent
118 therefore means "a leaven ate.."
Eating the Rising Agent
That is what The Shining is about. Drinking the Kool Aid. Spinning the Numbers. Consuming the Bird.
The Bear consumes the Bird, and a tide of blood issuing from The Bear's mouth is the result. A vomit of red blood. Gore. The Passion Play of the Bear and the Bird. The elevator's bloodline. The Rising Agent meets 8, Bears with wings.
19 minutes into The Shining, Danny says "...ate each other up?."
19 minutes into 2001 is where the spinning bone reverses direction (about to turn into a space station).
"Up" is the Rising Agent.
Shot 19 of the Shining has Danny saying "I just don't" (eye just don't)
Shot 19 of The Shining, Danny holds a sandwich with a huge bite out of it, that he did not take. It is a Bear-sized bite. Danny's other hand has a finger pointing UP.
I think the overall visual effect is that the characters appear to be puppeted by an unseen hand. Shining is control of the mind and spinning is control of the body.
Are you claiming to have compared the number of spins in The Shining versus what we see in the "average" film and found a high ratio? If so, what's a ballpark estimate of that relationship?
@Californius No, I'm not saying that. Everybody "spins," in all films, all the time. It's a character of movement through any confined space and pretty much cannot be avoided. What I am saying is Kubrick uses this condition in a special way and with a multi-tiered purpose. He is asking us firstly to "notice" the spin characteristics (which is primarily what I have done in this video). Then he is urging us to look closer and identify what it all means (which I have been doing for several years).
@shawnfella Take for example the first (human) spin of the film. Shot 10, Jack walks into the Lobby of the Overlook. It is the first order of business. Jack "spins" his head to the right and looks directly into the camera. Beneath him, and aligned with his spin is a camera sitting on the table beside the sitting man. Double metaphor. Behind him, as he reaches the apogee of his head spin, he comes into perfect alignment with the corner of the wall abutment. Another metaphor.....
@shawnfella Then, as he "spins' his head back into position, the woman seated behind him takes up the moving metaphor. She "spins" her head to the left and looks directly into the camera, or at Jack who by now is aligned with her site-line to the camera. Of course these spins are also aligned to the timeline and the progressing frame count and themselves are in possession of numerological intelligence. It just keeps going... each "spin" has it's own subtextual purpose.
@shawnfella The first non-human spin in film (barring the spinning tires of the yellow VW) is from Shot 8 - the helicopter shot circling in (spinning?) on the Overlook Hotel exterior. We see the SPINNING helicopter blades come down from the top of the frame into the shot. Oops, right? Wrong. It is deliberate.. in fact the first and most important spin metaphor in the film. It's Kubrick saying LOOK AT THE SPIN.
Interesting take on Kubrick's multi-layered film. I appreciate this fresh approach to yet another dynamic of style that made him so special--perhaps unique to all of film history.
"Beginning to blur with its own speed. Through the shifting,
spiraling curtain of light we see bodies moving in a kind of
weightlessness, always struggling to move higher." -Logan's Run script - spinning as the last conscious sensation before "RENEWAL" or death. Poole also goes for a spin (his jog on the Discovery) hinting at his fate (Whirlpool?) There is a ghostly essence to the movements of most Kubrick characters- it's hard to pin down- keep rolling, Shawn!
Spins are part of the visual storytelling technique Kubrick used.
When people spin and rotate this much, it means they don't control their fate. They are being spun by forces beyond their control. Clever use of the camera to communicate this. Paul Thomas Anderson did something like this in " Punch Drunk Love." Hitchcock did this in "Vertigo."
Also, the spins suggest the giant maze outdoors, which is similar to the hotel layout indoors. Clever Kubrick.
so whats the point? ppl a entire video about spinning in Kubrick's film the shining? wtf? the spinning motions are well pointed out but there has to be some purpose isn't there for making this video?
@pierre1024 Yes. I have about a hundred of these that I am in the process of making. Kubrick was a complex guy that made complex movies containing complex subtext. We are just getting started here.
@TheIndigenous1 We'll get to that in time. Look at this video as a catalog, not an essay on the final secrets of Stanley Kubrick. I don't think I could state that in a 13 minute video, or in a 500 character limit Youtube comment.
Part of the answer to your question is the simple fact that SPIN, as a concept, exists in The Shining.
This is so STUPID!!! Yeah, the movie would have been so much better if every actor just stood square shoulders and never turned their head or torso. Imagine if Scatman was standing in front of a can of tomatoes, we would have had to put a hundred actors named Tom in there. Based on this flimsy and retarded premise all movies must have a can of spinach in there somewhere because every movie I have ever seen has actors that turn their heads and bodies from time to time.
What are your qualifications for doing an alchemical analysis of Kubrick's work? You go on and on about "spin," even though most of your examples are merely partial turns; something stage and film actors do A LOT. You've also stressed the importance of "spin" in the "big pcture," yet you've not indicated how or why it's important.
@shawnfella "You are one of those demanding people, aren't you."
No, I'm one of those "questioning" people who don't have a taste for pablum, nor much time for the purveyors of it.
Jay Weidner has written extensively about "Alchemical Kubrick." But then, Weidner has a pretty good grasp on the works of Fulcanelli and how they relate to Kubrick's work.
I didn't "demand" to know your qualifications, I simply asked if you had any. Apparently, the answer is, "No."
if it were true, according to this video, everyone would walk straight lines and never turn their heads. i think youre fishing. just my opinion, though.
@derstammkains Dude, I'm not "fishing." There are plenty of spins, particularly of the head, that I did not outline. Those, I believe, were natural movements of the actors and not vital to the subtext. The ones with arrows are part of Kubrick's direction, or at least part of his requirement to call a shot useful. That's why he took so many of takes legendarily. Every motion and every position is part of Kubrick's vision. Part of the subtextual "work" the shot must realize.
@derstammkains Okay but you DO see the spin though, right? Because that is all I am doing here. I'm trying to get you to "see" the spin. That's why I put the arrows in there.
@tremblaydaniel I'm not out to "waste your time," but to deconstruct Stanley Kubrick. You don't HAVE to like it. But I'm sorry that you don't. Perhaps you find "spin" boring. Maybe the next one will be more exciting for you.
Mustn't actors put some spin into their movements lest a wooden performance is rendered? Most likely Kubrick said something like, "I want a sense of ballet in your movements." Lives spinning out of control oddball stuff. There is motion and the actors swirl in a subtle dance, but there's no way each little spin was minutely choreographed.
@mukk1234 Well, it's not what I'm trying to say, it's what Kubrick is trying to say. Spin is part of a bigger picture. I'm just showing you some brush strokes. Gradually the big picture will emerge.
@Baffykoma There are other "motifs" that Kubrick employs which are not outlined in this video, but will be in following ones. The "motifs work in conjunction with each other.
SPIN = Somebody Please Interpret Nonstop
KnightOwl2006 4 days ago
I feel dizzy!
byrdsmaniac 1 month ago in playlist More videos from shawnfella
1:52, WTF I dont remember that part.
infinitesimotel 2 months ago
@infinitesimotel there is two versions, American and european. This is cut from the American vesion. Or vice versa, any way I think they cut it cause it was too obvious to the subliminal story about what was really wrong with danny.
treefrog2108 1 month ago
@treefrog2108 AH ok, thanks m8.
infinitesimotel 1 month ago
I was going to say that this is a case of over-analysis. However, I am going to agree with californiacamera. It can be interpreted as symbolic. It may, nevertheless, have been unintentional in some instances.
DarkAmbient93 3 months ago
@DarkAmbient93 I've got them all mapped and timed. Every spin in The Shining is part of a broader subtextual language, and every one of them is choreographed, and intentional.
shawnfella 3 months ago
Have you actually articulated some theory to go along with the yellow arrows? What is their significance?
Clovissimus2008 1 month ago in playlist More videos from shawnfella
That sound is not good, your theories are not bad!
MonsunFilmatorium 4 months ago in playlist More videos from shawnfella
@MonsunFilmatorium I rather like the music. It is my old band from years back. I'm on the bass. The lyrics of all three songs track the Kubrick-action onscreen in a rather interesting fashion... I thought.
shawnfella 4 months ago
@shawnfella okay, I didn't know that. Keep up the good work on both theory side and music side. I think it's because I would have chosen something different, and reacted a bit of my standards- controversial. Have a continuing great night :D
MonsunFilmatorium 4 months ago
Oh man, this is so right on. I saw people turning/spinning in "Love Actually", too. And "Garfield: The Movie"! I bet they're all connected!
pyenapple 5 months ago 5
@pyenapple - you're just worried in case he blows up your mask-face come hallowe'en. 'you wouldn't tell them all about our evil clubs would you stan?' yes.
JustSomePerson888 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
spinning is how you time-travel without machines, Nexus article from late 90s about the original wingmakers material, before or same issue they published the Dr Anderson interviews, was from a guy describing how to time-travel by walking around in circles with objects from the time to go to - the likes of the Tzolkin calander shows how it can work, there's days which are the same colour&number and those days all align in the universe's toroid windings. so you go parallel & then along, 90 degrees
MannySteinerBIeeky 5 months ago
spinning is how you time-travel without machines, Nexus article from late 90s about the original wingmakers material, before or same issue they published the Dr Anderson interviews, was from a guy describing how to time-travel by walking around in circles with objects from the time to go to - the likes of the Tzolkin calander shows how it can work, there's days which are the same colour&number and those days all align in the universe's toroid windings. so you go parallel & then along, 90 degrees
MannySteinerBIeeky 5 months ago
Comment removed
heroehat 8 months ago
@heroehat Consciously planned, of course. It is the nature of "filmmaking." All of it is pure calculation. It's called DIRECTING.
shawnfella 8 months ago
im spinned out now lol
bartlemy 11 months ago
I think you're spinning out of control with your theories. Ha ha ha.
katinaanimator 11 months ago 3
@katinaanimator They are not theories. They are observations. Ha ha ha.
shawnfella 11 months ago
Certainly, to know the future, understand the past. In all an underlying logical consequence, enforced or derived, patterns emerge out of chaos so choose wisely. Agree to Meaningful Coincidence? What came first, source or consequence, chicken or egg? Shining... close to Spinning, and in the preponderance of marked shots, People Looking Back. Jack on back through his past to another past and becomes it in the last shot. Tell, is Scatman's hotel the eye of HAL? Sight understands Colors too. REDRUM
MrMerehuman 11 months ago
@MrMerehuman Yes. color is very important in The Shining. It is vital to understand how color informs Kubrick's number codes, his sequence-span interrelationships, and most all of his timing, his alignments and his prescribed motion, and even his Sub Bears - are related to color. The Journey of Red is supported by 42. 42 is the number of degrees that the color red appears (relative to the observer's retina) in a RAINBOW. It's the mouth of the Bear that gushes. No one element means any one thing.
shawnfella 11 months ago
@shawnfella The color green is 39, for reasons that will soon be abundantly clear.
8 is the Bear, the id, the coincidence, the vessel, the subconscious. 11 is he Bird. the Rising Agent, the coupled pair, Recurring Calumet canisters are not about the Indian chief label as much as they are the feathers of his head dress. THE RISING AGENT. It fills The Shining.
9 (and its spun 6). are Kubrick, the elephant in the room.The yellow elephant.
The Shining is built around a color-number equation.
shawnfella 11 months ago
@shawnfella The numbers (in The Shining) are ranked upon their relationship to "spin. The "spin-able" numbers are 8, and 1, or 11. As well 88 (and any appropriate combination of these numbers such as 818, and so. These number morphologically survive a 180 degree spin.
Two other numbers are a special case, a binary spin pair, if you will. of 6 and 9. The only digit pairing where one becomes the other upon spin. 6 becomes 9 and vice versa..
the core "home base" number is 237.
shawnfella 11 months ago
@shawnfella 237 is 118 + 119.
118 and 119 are the "princes" of the number array. They are the Jacks. The left and right Bauer.
Shot 118 is Danny in the store room amid numbered boxes in a slow zoom that occurs while he goes into a Shining trance about to "receive" from Hallorann. Shot 119 is the Chef spinning his head 45 degrees to utter How'd you like some ice cream (eye scream) - while the word spin(ach) emerges from his "spine."
118 + 119 = 237
11 and 8 are also meant to be phonetical.
shawnfella 11 months ago
@shawnfella 8 = "ate"
11 = "a leaven" (Calumet Baking powder) The Rising Agent. The leavening agent
118 therefore means "a leaven ate.."
Eating the Rising Agent
That is what The Shining is about. Drinking the Kool Aid. Spinning the Numbers. Consuming the Bird.
The Bear consumes the Bird, and a tide of blood issuing from The Bear's mouth is the result. A vomit of red blood. Gore. The Passion Play of the Bear and the Bird. The elevator's bloodline. The Rising Agent meets 8, Bears with wings.
shawnfella 11 months ago
@shawnfella 11+8 = 19
19 minutes into The Shining, Danny says "...ate each other up?."
19 minutes into 2001 is where the spinning bone reverses direction (about to turn into a space station).
"Up" is the Rising Agent.
Shot 19 of the Shining has Danny saying "I just don't" (eye just don't)
Shot 19 of The Shining, Danny holds a sandwich with a huge bite out of it, that he did not take. It is a Bear-sized bite. Danny's other hand has a finger pointing UP.
shawnfella 11 months ago
I think the overall visual effect is that the characters appear to be puppeted by an unseen hand. Shining is control of the mind and spinning is control of the body.
belliott89 11 months ago
Are you claiming to have compared the number of spins in The Shining versus what we see in the "average" film and found a high ratio? If so, what's a ballpark estimate of that relationship?
Californius 11 months ago
@Californius No, I'm not saying that. Everybody "spins," in all films, all the time. It's a character of movement through any confined space and pretty much cannot be avoided. What I am saying is Kubrick uses this condition in a special way and with a multi-tiered purpose. He is asking us firstly to "notice" the spin characteristics (which is primarily what I have done in this video). Then he is urging us to look closer and identify what it all means (which I have been doing for several years).
shawnfella 11 months ago
@shawnfella Take for example the first (human) spin of the film. Shot 10, Jack walks into the Lobby of the Overlook. It is the first order of business. Jack "spins" his head to the right and looks directly into the camera. Beneath him, and aligned with his spin is a camera sitting on the table beside the sitting man. Double metaphor. Behind him, as he reaches the apogee of his head spin, he comes into perfect alignment with the corner of the wall abutment. Another metaphor.....
shawnfella 11 months ago
@shawnfella Then, as he "spins' his head back into position, the woman seated behind him takes up the moving metaphor. She "spins" her head to the left and looks directly into the camera, or at Jack who by now is aligned with her site-line to the camera. Of course these spins are also aligned to the timeline and the progressing frame count and themselves are in possession of numerological intelligence. It just keeps going... each "spin" has it's own subtextual purpose.
shawnfella 11 months ago
@shawnfella The first non-human spin in film (barring the spinning tires of the yellow VW) is from Shot 8 - the helicopter shot circling in (spinning?) on the Overlook Hotel exterior. We see the SPINNING helicopter blades come down from the top of the frame into the shot. Oops, right? Wrong. It is deliberate.. in fact the first and most important spin metaphor in the film. It's Kubrick saying LOOK AT THE SPIN.
shawnfella 11 months ago
Interesting take on Kubrick's multi-layered film. I appreciate this fresh approach to yet another dynamic of style that made him so special--perhaps unique to all of film history.
JustMeandOnlyMe 11 months ago
@shawnfella CAROUSEL
"Beginning to blur with its own speed. Through the shifting,
spiraling curtain of light we see bodies moving in a kind of
weightlessness, always struggling to move higher." -Logan's Run script - spinning as the last conscious sensation before "RENEWAL" or death. Poole also goes for a spin (his jog on the Discovery) hinting at his fate (Whirlpool?) There is a ghostly essence to the movements of most Kubrick characters- it's hard to pin down- keep rolling, Shawn!
hozayamz 1 year ago
@hozayamz As always hoz, you're commentary is right on the money.
shawnfella 1 year ago
@shawnfella I have a habit of putting the apostrophe in where it doesn't belong. Probably something to do with being a Zappa fan.
shawnfella 1 year ago
if people only knew what spinning did for their dna
zin606 1 year ago
My head is spinning.
RodanX21 1 year ago
@blendn61 "Usefulness" is an entirely subjective concept.
shawnfella 1 year ago
Technically most of these movements would not be called spinning, but rather turning...
dljm226 1 year ago
@dljm226 Or partial spins.
shawnfella 1 year ago
OK, People are Fish.
MrMerehuman 11 months ago
@MrMerehuman Makes me laugh. Good one.
shawnfella 11 months ago
Thanks.
Spins are part of the visual storytelling technique Kubrick used.
When people spin and rotate this much, it means they don't control their fate. They are being spun by forces beyond their control. Clever use of the camera to communicate this. Paul Thomas Anderson did something like this in " Punch Drunk Love." Hitchcock did this in "Vertigo."
Also, the spins suggest the giant maze outdoors, which is similar to the hotel layout indoors. Clever Kubrick.
californiacamera 1 year ago 2
@californiacamera Thank you californiacamera. Refreshing to hear from someone who "gets it."
shawnfella 1 year ago
so whats the point? ppl a entire video about spinning in Kubrick's film the shining? wtf? the spinning motions are well pointed out but there has to be some purpose isn't there for making this video?
pierre1024 1 year ago
@pierre1024 Yes. I have about a hundred of these that I am in the process of making. Kubrick was a complex guy that made complex movies containing complex subtext. We are just getting started here.
shawnfella 1 year ago
ok, I see the spins. So what does it suppose to mean!
TheIndigenous1 1 year ago
@TheIndigenous1 We'll get to that in time. Look at this video as a catalog, not an essay on the final secrets of Stanley Kubrick. I don't think I could state that in a 13 minute video, or in a 500 character limit Youtube comment.
Part of the answer to your question is the simple fact that SPIN, as a concept, exists in The Shining.
shawnfella 1 year ago
Sorry but i'm not smart enough to see anything particularly special about the spinning.
wizenedgoatbeard 1 year ago
This is so STUPID!!! Yeah, the movie would have been so much better if every actor just stood square shoulders and never turned their head or torso. Imagine if Scatman was standing in front of a can of tomatoes, we would have had to put a hundred actors named Tom in there. Based on this flimsy and retarded premise all movies must have a can of spinach in there somewhere because every movie I have ever seen has actors that turn their heads and bodies from time to time.
ragnbull 1 year ago
@ragnbull Well, there is no accounting for dimwittedness, is there.
shawnfella 1 year ago
What are your qualifications for doing an alchemical analysis of Kubrick's work? You go on and on about "spin," even though most of your examples are merely partial turns; something stage and film actors do A LOT. You've also stressed the importance of "spin" in the "big pcture," yet you've not indicated how or why it's important.
bluesojourn 1 year ago
@bluesojourn You are one of those demanding people, aren't you.
shawnfella 1 year ago
@shawnfella "You are one of those demanding people, aren't you."
No, I'm one of those "questioning" people who don't have a taste for pablum, nor much time for the purveyors of it.
Jay Weidner has written extensively about "Alchemical Kubrick." But then, Weidner has a pretty good grasp on the works of Fulcanelli and how they relate to Kubrick's work.
I didn't "demand" to know your qualifications, I simply asked if you had any. Apparently, the answer is, "No."
bluesojourn 1 year ago
@bluesojourn Sounds to me like your purpose is to drop Jay Weidner's name on my page.
shawnfella 1 year ago
if it were true, according to this video, everyone would walk straight lines and never turn their heads. i think youre fishing. just my opinion, though.
derstammkains 1 year ago
@derstammkains Dude, I'm not "fishing." There are plenty of spins, particularly of the head, that I did not outline. Those, I believe, were natural movements of the actors and not vital to the subtext. The ones with arrows are part of Kubrick's direction, or at least part of his requirement to call a shot useful. That's why he took so many of takes legendarily. Every motion and every position is part of Kubrick's vision. Part of the subtextual "work" the shot must realize.
shawnfella 1 year ago
@shawnfella i just dont see how you could ever prove this is anything more than opinion. i wont deny that it is possible, but i just dont see it.
derstammkains 1 year ago
@derstammkains Okay but you DO see the spin though, right? Because that is all I am doing here. I'm trying to get you to "see" the spin. That's why I put the arrows in there.
shawnfella 1 year ago
this on was a waste of time, sorry i loved the others
tremblaydaniel 1 year ago
@tremblaydaniel I'm not out to "waste your time," but to deconstruct Stanley Kubrick. You don't HAVE to like it. But I'm sorry that you don't. Perhaps you find "spin" boring. Maybe the next one will be more exciting for you.
shawnfella 1 year ago
i absolutely believe they were not. ;)
derstammkains 1 year ago
Mustn't actors put some spin into their movements lest a wooden performance is rendered? Most likely Kubrick said something like, "I want a sense of ballet in your movements." Lives spinning out of control oddball stuff. There is motion and the actors swirl in a subtle dance, but there's no way each little spin was minutely choreographed.
HyperIndividualist 1 year ago
I liked your other videos, but I really dont know what your getting at here or what your trying to say.
mukk1234 1 year ago
@mukk1234 Well, it's not what I'm trying to say, it's what Kubrick is trying to say. Spin is part of a bigger picture. I'm just showing you some brush strokes. Gradually the big picture will emerge.
shawnfella 1 year ago
@shawnfella I absolutely guarantee you that each spin was choreographed..
shawnfella 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shawnfella were you on set?
derstammkains 1 year ago
@shawnfella spinning opens your channel - very important
zin606 1 year ago
@zin606 There you go. :)
shawnfella 1 year ago
@shawnfella Watched this several time and can't come up with the big picture?
Can you give some leads?
Baffykoma 1 year ago
@Baffykoma There are other "motifs" that Kubrick employs which are not outlined in this video, but will be in following ones. The "motifs work in conjunction with each other.
shawnfella 1 year ago