Also, I think it's GREAT you disabled comments on your other videos, it's really nice that you can't take any heat for all the bullshit that has spewed from your mouth. Classic.
I believe in freedom. The freedom for a cancer patient to smoke weed. The freedom for a cop to smoke weed. The freedom for people to do salvia, or use FreeBSD without looking over there shoulders. The freedom to live without meaningless one liners delivered by politicians talking to people who do not speak for me and my friends or anyone I know. The same laws and ideas here are in russia, bulgaria, commie china, and the usa. The pc party is just another puppet of financial institutions.
speaking of family. If a soldier in the army, decides to drink as much 151 as he possibly can. Infact alcoholism is encouraged, naval officers drink for free and often on ships. For many years Canadian and American soldiers, especially Navy, would enjoy the occasional joint. Now if they do they are literally destroyed and jailed for years, and taken from their families. Your progressive conservative no tolerance laws have a very east german 1985 quality to them. I have no tolerance for you.
The funny thing is, these cons spout their post justinian nonsense with such zeal! Its also funny how The Republican Party, sharia law, the global procon collective, and the irish republican party are all the right wing. While libs and much farther to the left you got commies. So the pc, republicans and commies, all fight secret wars, conduct mass censorship and surveillance on its people, and they both seem to prize sterility above creativity.
What's the concrete plan, Mr. Hudak? You say you'll make Ontario wonderful and all without tax increases, and that sounds great, but how, realistically are you going to do it? It's a serious issue that when you talk about economic issues, the numbers just don't add up. That's particularly true when it comes to talking about Hydro, Mr. Hudak. As your sketchy plan to ruin Niagara by pushing a new highway up its interior? ...Please... Your campaign lacks credibility, Mr. Hudak.
I'm not voting for anyone, they're all useless idiots who can't, and don't want to, understand the Canadian people. They all just twist their words and ideas in whatever way will get them more votes and support for the next four years rather than coming up with long-term solutions that our childrens' children could benefit from.
how are you going to miantain our great healthcare, roads, etc. by lowering taxes we will be all fucked if this douche is elected. he honestly thinks taxes is the issue the top income tax bracket is 29%, thats pretty good considering we have free healthcare and other social benefits. No stress being an ontarian and i like that
nope... we are not foreign workers.. we have an identity.... i dunno.. what to choose.. more taxes or lost identity??.. i'll go with more taxes, and program for tax incentive for those who hire immigrant woker..
Way to go, Hudak. Putting your video on youtube, trying to "reach out". I just came here to vote this video down, and I see I'm not alone. You wanted exposure? You got it, and this is what we think of you.
waitwaitwait... you obviously want to cut funding to hospitals, education and other services if you're lowering taxes. Where else would the money come from to pay for all of that? I'm pretty sure most people understand that to get those fundamental services they need to pay a decent amount of tax. There is no perfect world where everything can be provided for, without coming at a price. What do you want to do conservative party? Turn us in to the United States? No thanks. PC party is just C
Way, way too conservative. Too heavy-handed and too much intrusiveness into our lives and then have the nerve to say you want to work for the average families while you stage photo ops like you did in Leamington. And by the way, the hard-working families you talk about are working in the labour field you want to gut and our represented by the unions you hate.
"Put a few dollars back into the pockets of... the average working families" - Thank you so much, ah you are so generous to us, the "average" folks, we are so not worthy :)
@Mrfeckyew It's funny that you admit that. It's quite clear that the generation below the baby boomers have been completely brainwashed by the public school system and the media into a leftist mindset. You people are puppets who have grown up without a common sense mindset, just regurgitating all the crap you see in the media and learn in the education system. The education system of our generation is the most liberalized institution ever.
Hudak: Just another puppet working for the NWO. Enough corrupt politicians shit.
No main stream political parties are worth your trust, they already sold their souls to the banks and large corporations. Refuse the slave system, don't vote
@inanatto yea I'm sure Hudak will be swayed by your Youtube message to go away. As for the statement that no one likes him the polls suggest differently.
Best Health Care?? I, like half a million other Canadians had no doctor when I suffered a traumatic Brain Injury: I lost my home, my job and my health because my disability insurance relied upon doctors who care. Couldn't find ONE!
Best Health Care?? I, like half a million other Canadians had no doctor when I suffered a traumatic Brain Injury: I lost my home, my job and my health because my disability insurance relied upon doctors who care. Couldn't find ONE!
I don't understand how people can continue to propose Reaganomics when it has proven over the last 3 decades to be the one of the most devastating attacks on the working class in modern history. Corporate tax cuts DO NOT CREATE JOBS. If you want the hard evidence, google "ccpa no new jobs". Not that Liberals or NDP are much different. I'm just saying.
@shakur420 I like what Tim is saying but he is too polite and quiet about it.
With the liberals e-health, ecotax, green energy crap etc, Tim has lots of ammo that he never uses. I also think this $10,000. grant to hire new Canadians is pure bullshit and stupid but again Tim is not yelling enough.
Just like John Tory, Tim is going to grab defeat from the jaws of victory.
We can not continue to increase spending when we don't have the income to support it. Stop daycare and kindergarden etc.
@justanoldman1 What you're describing is the destruction of social services - the only reason for having a government. The idea that we don't have money for social spending - kindergarten, healthcare, daycare, welfare, etc. is the propaganda of the wealthy. The wealthy don't care about subsidized healthcare because they can afford $500/week on it. Why do we have one of the lowest corporate tax rates in the world (federal)? That's why we don't have revenue, not because of kindergarten.
@shakur420 OK I guess you want our country to turn into another Greece or be as bankruped as the States are.
It is basic encomonics, you can not spend more than you have without it bittingyou in the ass.
Even with our lower rates(which are still too high) companies are moving their operations to third world countries for lower salaries. You idea of increasing the min wage will only speed things up even more.
Try to find anything made in Canada, even our candy business has moved to Mexico.
@justanoldman1 Greece happened because they took Reaganomics to the extreme. Do your homework before you try to teach. People stopped paying taxes because they had enough of state subsidies to the rich - Or do you not consider corporate bailouts to be state subsidies to the rich?
@justanoldman1 Your entire narrative ignores one simple thing. Giving money to the rich does not create jobs. Regulation will prevent capital flight. All successful economies (U.S., Japan-centered Asia and Germany-centered Europe) have used immense regulation to control capital movements, to prevent the closing of factories, the exporting of jobs and capital. Read, learn, don't quote me rhetoric from rich politicians. Learn before you preach and you might not look so foolish.
@justanoldman1 Look at history. South Korea used to have the death penalty for certain amounts of capital flight. The U.S. is one of the most highly regulated economies on the planet. Your, or rather, the wealthy's narrative that higher corporate taxes will result in capital flight ignores the obvious, assumes that we can't think for ourselves. How do you prevent capital flight? Regulation. lol. It's not rocket science. It's basic, first grade economics. You might wanna look it up.
@shakur420 The government is not there to take care of us, they are there to run the country. It is up to us to take care of ourselves. Like President Kennedy said " ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country,"
We are growing generations of lazy bums that do not want to work uless they get huge salaries. We can not even find any workers to pick our fruit or work our farms, they are all socialists like you.
@justanoldman1 Kennedy was a mass murderer.Anyone with a minimal understanding of history recognizes basic facts. Indochina, 3 million slaughtered and attacked with chemical warfare. Cuba attacked overtly and covertly through U.S.-funded terrorist operations (terrorists condemned by the FBI, I might add), followed by one of the worst economic attacks in history. All illegal under the Nuremberg principles, if you care at all for international law. Do your homework. Seriously.
@justanoldman1 The solution to the problems of everyday people is to increase social spending, raise corporate taxes, lower military budgets and eliminate tax havens/incentives for the wealthy and corporate sector. This is understood by every economist and political commentator on the planet. Reaganomics, or "top down/trickle down economics" does not work for the working/middle/lower classes. It enriches the wealthy who create no jobs for us.
@shakur420 The solution is to ban unions and have people work for a living. Unions workers are a bad joke. The post office is a perfect example of this, most only work 2 hours a day but collect 8 hours pay.
In every hospital the cleaning staff are the same, they sleep at night and play cards during the day, they do not clean the rooms.
We need insentives like west jet has, give everyone a profit share so they really work and not try to get away with the least amount of work.
@justanoldman1 HAHA. Unions correlate with democratic advancement. It's a fact of history. Unions are what protect the working class. Think about it. Unions protect the workers, give the workers leverage over the owners. Workers represent the masses, owners represent the minority who own everything. We need collective organization in order to level the playing field when dealing with people who hold enormous amounts of capital. It's fundamental socio-economics.
@justanoldman1 HAHA. Unions correlate with democratic advancement. It's a fact of history. Unions are what protect the working class. Think about it. Unions protect the workers, give the workers leverage over the owners. Workers represent the masses, owners represent the minority who own everything. We need collective organization in order to level the playing field when dealing with people who hold enormous amounts of capital. It's fundamental socio-economics.
@justanoldman1 Your twisted version of "libertarianism" is upside down. Go back to the classic, Adam Smith. He would reject your notion that unions need to go, that people are "lazy". He recognized the immense need for regulation by the government on the part of the citizenry to protect our interests from the greed of the "merchants and manufacturers' - the corporate sector of the day. Read a book or something, it might help you understand basic economics.
@justanoldman1 Reaganomics has always been presented as "stimulating the economy" which is true. It increases trade, development and creates soaring profits - for the wealthy. It does not increase a single thing for the average citizen, this is also well known and openly admitted by those who talk of "stimulating the economy". By "stimulation", they mean "soaring profits" for corporations and the wealthy. This is well understood and never denied or debated by anyone with any credibility.
@justanoldman1 I mentioned a clear, applicable source. Google "ccpa no new jobs". The report was released this year and completely, uncontroversially, demonstrates that Harper's attempt at applying Reaganomics to Canada in the last few years (by dropping corporate tax cuts to some of the lowest in the world) has created no new jobs, in other words, done nothing for people like me and you (unless you're a troll working for the PC party).
@justanoldman1 As if the massive failure (for the middle/working class) of Reagan and Thatcher's policies wasn't proof enough that enriching the wealthy does not help us, we now have more than enough documentation about our own situation. When we lower corporate taxes to "attract capital", that capital is not used for the benefit of the population, rather it's used to enrich the already wealthy. The numbers don't lie.
@justanoldman1 If you want to "stimulate" the economy, in a way that will benefit the middle/working class, the solutions are well known. You raise corporate taxes, lower interests rates, increase social spending and programs. You stimulate the population to spend by giving them money, increasing minimum wage, lowering the taxes of lower/middle income families. This generates spending and stimulates the economy in real terms. Terms that help the population.
@justanoldman1 Uh, yeah. "Socialism" means worker's control over production. You know, those who work in the factories should own them, in the words of U.S. workers in the 1800s. Socialist economic principles (workers having control of economic policies) is the only viable way to achieve Democracy in a society, at least that our species knows of. Why do you think rich people support highly regulated Capitalism and poor people support worker's control? Do the math. And your homework.
@shakur420 Well the socialist countries around the world are all going into bankrupcty because when workers are in charge and or unions are in charge, no one wants to work and the country goes to pot.
Unions had their day but now the answer is profit sharing, like westjet does, that way people work hard but share in the profits. Unions and socialism do not work, their time is gone.
@justanoldman1 Again, research. You won't appear so uninformed and ridiculous. "Socialism" means workers control over production - not putting the words "socialist" in the name of your political party. What "socialist" governments do you speak of? Do you even know what the cold war was about? Have you read the NSC documents outlining the the threats in the 40s, 50s and 60s? The threat of "a good example" (Cuba), the threat of "independence" (Vietnam, Egypt)? Do you know the basics?
@justanoldman1 "Unions had their day". Exactly, in the 40s and 50s, when the concentration of wealth was not so concentrated, when there was more popular participation in government, when the U.S. was not the worst of all the industrialized countries, as it is today (standard of living). It's proven that the stronger labor organization is, the more democratic a country is. Google it.
@justanoldman1 So, what do you mean by "socialist" countries? Venezuela? More democratic than our country, more social spending, economic growth and a rising standard of living for it's people. Cuba? Praised by economists all over the world for it's unprecedented success to formulate economic policy while under such brutal violent and economic attack. Also, provides the most doctors to the international world, thanks to their education system.
@justanoldman1 Though, I don't think Cuba and Venezuela fit the definition of "socialist", as workers do not control the economy. They have command economies, like us, the states and every other developed country. What makes them "socialist"? Because CBC says so? lol. Anyways, the only truly "socialist" initiatives, manifested on any significant scale have been Spain (civil war), Russia (pre-Bolshivek), Paris Communes and the many Native American societies who were here before us.
@shakur420 We were talking about Canada. None of the political parties are addressing the issue of the deficit and ever growing debt. Ontario has a debt of over 230 billion dollars and the liberal government is always offering new programs so they can spend even more money they don't have. What I have said is why start new costly programs like all day kindergarden etc. when the cost of government is growing 8% per year and the GDP has only grown by 10% over the last 8 years.
@justanoldman1 Yeah, we're talking about Canada. That still doesn't change basic economic principles. "Deficits" are not a bad thing. States are supposed to run on deficits. How do people like me and you buy a house (and then buy a bigger house)? By going into debt. We can do it, but the government can't? HAHA. Scaring people about the deficit is a way to slash social services (like the debt ceiling drama that was going on in the U.S. a few weeks back).
@justanoldman1 Presenting the deficit as an indication that we "can't afford" social spending is an old, instantly recognizable tactic to implement regressive taxes. So, they will cut transit (and kindergarten) funding, and as a result, the poor get an increase in taxes. Transit is a tax for us. Rich people have cars, limos, company vehicles, the poor use transit. An increase in fees because of a lack of funding is called a "regressive tax" - a tax on the poor, look it up.
@justanoldman1 Now, if you do want to tackle the deficit, you address the revenues, the income. This is business 101. If you want growth in a company, you don't cut costs, you increase revenue. If you want to simply increase your profits, then sure, cut costs, lower your margins, you don't care about growth. For growth, you increase revenues. It's well known how to raise revenues and increase - not decrease - the standard of living (social spending). Tax the wealthy and corporations.
@justanoldman1 They wanna deal with the deficit? They know how. Raise taxes on the wealthy and increase corporate taxes, eliminate overseas tax havens, etc. Our federal corporate tax rate is like 18% (soon to be 15%, the lowest in the world). It's funny, like I already mentioned, Reaganomics (and "Thatcherism") already devastated the middle/working class, yet people still tow the line. Do your homework and see what economists say about job creation, stimulation, etc., not politicians.
@justanoldman1 And before you talk about "job loss" were we to tax the wealthy correctly, remember, like every other successful economy, we can install capital controls to prevent flight and the export of production. If Canadian companies "close down" their operations, we can nationalize their production and run it ourselves (in the unlikely even tthat there aren't smaller companies around who are more than ready to fill the void).
@shakur420 Well a lot of the companies that closed was because their products were no longer needed, i.e. the pulp and paper companies that produced newsprint. We now use very little paper.
We live in a global world and our costs are just too high, a perfect example is Wendy's, 99 cents hamburgers in the States, 1.89 here, New cars, about 4,000 dollars more in Canada even though they are imported from Korea or Japan. Our min. wage is about double that of the States, we can not compete.
@justanoldman1 Sure we can "compete" (even though I don't know why we have to "compete" in the first place), if we take information from economists instead of politicians. Check history and how the big economies (U.S., Japan and Germany-centered Europe) developed - regulation. Has Wendy's closed because our burgers cost more? I work in a restaurant, I know exactly what you're talking about (our dairy pricing vs the U.S.). It has nothing to do with basic economic principles.
@shakur420 Perhaps you are not aware that 70% of our GNP is serving ourselves, i.e. resturants, retails stores building house etc. The other 30% is mostly made up of comodities that other countries buy from us, we really do not have much of a manufacturing industry left, with the exception of autos.
We even have to import workers to pick our fruits and veggies because Canadian won't do that type of work for the money it offers.
you clearly dont care about working families..your party is taking a hard run at labour proposing to take away our right to arbitration. you cant take away worker rights then openly kiss up to your corporate buddies then lie claiming that you care about working families...i hope Tim Hudak has clean shoes because he spends a lot of time with his foot in his mouth. he is not the man to lead this province. PC equals Canada TEA PARTY!!!!
What about the deficit???? We are going the way of Greece. User fees for health care. 2 year waiting period for OHIP coverage. Incentives for healthylifestyle. Reduce government red tape and useless departments (like Landlord and Tenants, Niagara Escarpment Commission, and Human Rights.)
Everything he's saying about positive change - keeping and creating jobs, standards of education and healthcare - are all things that have improved under the current government. I am a hard-working middle class Ontarian. I didn't vote Liberal in the last election, but I believe they've done a good job. All governments have to make difficult decisions, that's what they're there to do. Remember the last Ontario PC government? Do we really want to go down that road again? I don't think so.
What a load of crap! This guy is only running on strategy - he has no true vision for Ontario. He's betting on the voters being tired of McGuinty's face (which is true for a lot of us). He talks about all these things he will do, but doesn't say HOW he will do it. Look at the state of Toronto after Mike Harris: it doesn't have enough money to cover the services the province downloaded to it and is making cuts left right and centre. We need real solutions, not Harris' calculating, phony protege!
In reference to the pianoXfan comment, The explicit homo references are actually pertinent to the absurdly homo-misogyny demented traditions that McGuinty has based his career on. It's often thought that men that are not bald are not misogyny but McGuinty is a menstruation misogyny psychopath that simply prioritized revenge at those channels that dared to hit him at as scalp. 45 thousand 30 and 70 channel murders in a province of 13 million is absurdly disproportional murder lust psychopath.
He's talking about tax cuts but he's not talking about fair taxes. If the rich don't pay their fair share of taxes who do you think the money is going to come from?
The working class, thats who. It will come out of your social programs, our of school funding, out of hospital cuts out of the social safety net that holds us together.
It will be taken from the working class and given to his corporate pals. Anyway how the hell can Hudak do his job from under the desk of the corporate elite?
Im voting for the blue cuz dip shit liberal fucked us up the ass
Quote " I WONT RAISE TAXES"
Day 1 in office (no joke) taxes go up.
Srsly? u said u wont then u do?
I think the PC will lie the least and attempt not to ass rape us with taxes so thats why I voted for them at the federal and thats why ima vote for em at the provincial.
Damn liberals can suck a dick.
BTW THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHOULD INVESTIGATE XPLORNET FOR BREECH OF CONTRACT FOR POLICIES MADE EFFECTIVE APRIL 2011
I always try and be as fair and reasonable as possible. I've given the Conservatives credit these past few years for their superior strategies and messages, while the Liberals have floundered. Add to that I don't like Dalton McGuinty, you'd think I'd be for his opponent. Not so. Showing me pictures of happy families is an empty rhetorical gesture. Tell me EXACTLY how you will work for families, SPECIFIC policies that we can hold you to. This is nothing but hot air that promises nothing.
Hudak. you should focus like a lazor on sucking more corporate dick.
This party does not care about the people.
thoughtcriminalxxx 5 months ago
Also, I think it's GREAT you disabled comments on your other videos, it's really nice that you can't take any heat for all the bullshit that has spewed from your mouth. Classic.
tomshotme 5 months ago 2
Good video. That's a nice 22 likes you have Hudak. Douche.
tomshotme 5 months ago
I believe in freedom. The freedom for a cancer patient to smoke weed. The freedom for a cop to smoke weed. The freedom for people to do salvia, or use FreeBSD without looking over there shoulders. The freedom to live without meaningless one liners delivered by politicians talking to people who do not speak for me and my friends or anyone I know. The same laws and ideas here are in russia, bulgaria, commie china, and the usa. The pc party is just another puppet of financial institutions.
evildnalor 5 months ago
speaking of family. If a soldier in the army, decides to drink as much 151 as he possibly can. Infact alcoholism is encouraged, naval officers drink for free and often on ships. For many years Canadian and American soldiers, especially Navy, would enjoy the occasional joint. Now if they do they are literally destroyed and jailed for years, and taken from their families. Your progressive conservative no tolerance laws have a very east german 1985 quality to them. I have no tolerance for you.
evildnalor 5 months ago
The funny thing is, these cons spout their post justinian nonsense with such zeal! Its also funny how The Republican Party, sharia law, the global procon collective, and the irish republican party are all the right wing. While libs and much farther to the left you got commies. So the pc, republicans and commies, all fight secret wars, conduct mass censorship and surveillance on its people, and they both seem to prize sterility above creativity.
evildnalor 5 months ago
Hudak SUCKS!!!!!
riffwagner 5 months ago
What's the concrete plan, Mr. Hudak? You say you'll make Ontario wonderful and all without tax increases, and that sounds great, but how, realistically are you going to do it? It's a serious issue that when you talk about economic issues, the numbers just don't add up. That's particularly true when it comes to talking about Hydro, Mr. Hudak. As your sketchy plan to ruin Niagara by pushing a new highway up its interior? ...Please... Your campaign lacks credibility, Mr. Hudak.
oakvillebrian 5 months ago
my parents will for sure loose their jobs if hudak gets elected, please help me out... don't vote for him! please!!!
WorldlyMusi 5 months ago
I'm not voting for anyone, they're all useless idiots who can't, and don't want to, understand the Canadian people. They all just twist their words and ideas in whatever way will get them more votes and support for the next four years rather than coming up with long-term solutions that our childrens' children could benefit from.
jim0watkins 5 months ago
@jim0watkins i always feel like i have a choice between a giant douche and a turd sandwich
infectedsubincision 5 months ago 2
NDP or liberal <3
katlova16 5 months ago
I guess the administrator forgot to disable comments on this video !
maclovindotca 5 months ago
Why is there so many leftys on youtube? Also McGuinty is a disgrace to Ontario. Hudak all the way.
TheHockeyTank 5 months ago
@TheHockeyTank They just make a bunch of accounts and like their own comments. No big deal.
The1T4One 5 months ago
@The1T4One lol reality escapes you
6colin90 5 months ago
Phony!
riffwagner 5 months ago
Do not vote for this guy... He has no class...
riffwagner 5 months ago
NDP
riffwagner 5 months ago
Cool youtube page. Hey, why can't I comment on most of the vids?
koolguy1029 5 months ago
Hey Hudak, I can't hear you with all those dislikes in the way.
koolguy1029 5 months ago
one more reason not to vote for him or his party: they do not care about French Canadians or Franco-Ontarians
bourdon30 5 months ago
NDP
riffwagner 5 months ago
Never in my lifetime will I vote for the conservative party. Sit down, Tim Hudak.
PokemansAtTheDisco 5 months ago
@PokemansAtTheDisco Exactly. They forget Joe Clark. LOL!
Mightierthanever 5 months ago
We are fed up with you... Done buddy
alboss13 5 months ago
Does ANYONE remember what Mike Harris did??!?!? Do not elect this incompetent slime Canada, PLEASE. Students Vote.
dirkshrubb 5 months ago 2
how are you going to miantain our great healthcare, roads, etc. by lowering taxes we will be all fucked if this douche is elected. he honestly thinks taxes is the issue the top income tax bracket is 29%, thats pretty good considering we have free healthcare and other social benefits. No stress being an ontarian and i like that
atheistcommonsense 5 months ago
Goebbels would be impressed with this.
Arkinight 5 months ago
nope... we are not foreign workers.. we have an identity.... i dunno.. what to choose.. more taxes or lost identity??.. i'll go with more taxes, and program for tax incentive for those who hire immigrant woker..
shrivasv02 5 months ago
Comment removed
shrivasv02 5 months ago
NDP!!!! vote
riffwagner 5 months ago
NDP
TASSOS502 5 months ago
Stephen Harper lied to us.
Doug Ford lied to us.
Stop voting for Conservatives.
Gairm 5 months ago
Sure is butt-hurt ITT.
return135 5 months ago
Comment removed
return135 5 months ago
One party can't meet the needs of everyone. While i do agree with somethings, in the end the NDP party has my best interests as a student.
smaviii 5 months ago
ur c unt f or put this fag of a video on and i did your mon lST NIGHT SHE ENJOYED ITC SO MUCH HE Hd an anuerysm and died
gvc9999 5 months ago
someone needs to kick tim hudak off the internet.
danepstein138 5 months ago
Hudak you TERRORIST!!
LongBow1600 5 months ago
slimy bastard
hausy 5 months ago
tim hudak is a pice of shit for puting this video oon
gvc9999 5 months ago
Way to go, Hudak. Putting your video on youtube, trying to "reach out". I just came here to vote this video down, and I see I'm not alone. You wanted exposure? You got it, and this is what we think of you.
mcdonaIds 5 months ago
waitwaitwait... you obviously want to cut funding to hospitals, education and other services if you're lowering taxes. Where else would the money come from to pay for all of that? I'm pretty sure most people understand that to get those fundamental services they need to pay a decent amount of tax. There is no perfect world where everything can be provided for, without coming at a price. What do you want to do conservative party? Turn us in to the United States? No thanks. PC party is just C
itskatelynwithak 5 months ago
Way, way too conservative. Too heavy-handed and too much intrusiveness into our lives and then have the nerve to say you want to work for the average families while you stage photo ops like you did in Leamington. And by the way, the hard-working families you talk about are working in the labour field you want to gut and our represented by the unions you hate.
awoosoul 5 months ago
"Put a few dollars back into the pockets of... the average working families" - Thank you so much, ah you are so generous to us, the "average" folks, we are so not worthy :)
valtonik1 5 months ago
lies, propaganda, spectacle, puppetry of the penis. bullshit politicians are vassals for the rich.
victor1eremita 5 months ago
IM SO TIRED OF THE CONSERVATIVES!! YOURE LUCKY THE BABY BOOMERS ARE STILL ALIVE BECAUSE YOUR PARTY WONT EXIST AFTER THE DIE!!!
Mrfeckyew 5 months ago 24
@Mrfeckyew lmao my dad is a baby boomer and he loves the conservative party
infectedsubincision 5 months ago
@Mrfeckyew It's funny that you admit that. It's quite clear that the generation below the baby boomers have been completely brainwashed by the public school system and the media into a leftist mindset. You people are puppets who have grown up without a common sense mindset, just regurgitating all the crap you see in the media and learn in the education system. The education system of our generation is the most liberalized institution ever.
luke23waltz 5 months ago
Increase spending and cut taxes...yeah, how's that worked in the US for the last 10 years...or in our Federal government for the last 5.
Hudak doesn't want to get out of Hydro or health care, he want's to "manage it different" - by capping hydro prices..????
That would be an artificial price control and would lead to shortages...if hydro is expensive, then HYDRO IS expensive. Use less.
A populist with no concept of economics. How is that different than what we have?
Right, Hudak is an idiot.
johnycannuk 5 months ago 2
A supporter of forced labour, a supporter of allowing city inspectors to enter a private home without warrant.
No thanks. Hudak is a petty fascist twit. I'd much rather live under a boob like Dalton than a dangerous demogogue like Hudak.
He has no respect for our rights and wants to blow his nose with the Charter and wipe his ass with the Magna Carta.
No thanks.
johnycannuk 5 months ago
now, i wonder if he will actually keep his promise
ibrahim795 5 months ago
hey tim heard an interveiw on 102.1 the edge during labor day weekend i trust you will lead our province in a strong and positive way
ItsMrNotorious 5 months ago
Hudak: Just another puppet working for the NWO. Enough corrupt politicians shit.
No main stream political parties are worth your trust, they already sold their souls to the banks and large corporations. Refuse the slave system, don't vote
Louaner 5 months ago
@inanatto yea I'm sure Hudak will be swayed by your Youtube message to go away. As for the statement that no one likes him the polls suggest differently.
mars3750 5 months ago
Lol
Canadian politics XD
darrinr769 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Best Health Care?? I, like half a million other Canadians had no doctor when I suffered a traumatic Brain Injury: I lost my home, my job and my health because my disability insurance relied upon doctors who care. Couldn't find ONE!
LuvinJesusynot 5 months ago
Best Health Care?? I, like half a million other Canadians had no doctor when I suffered a traumatic Brain Injury: I lost my home, my job and my health because my disability insurance relied upon doctors who care. Couldn't find ONE!
LuvinJesusynot 5 months ago
I don't understand how people can continue to propose Reaganomics when it has proven over the last 3 decades to be the one of the most devastating attacks on the working class in modern history. Corporate tax cuts DO NOT CREATE JOBS. If you want the hard evidence, google "ccpa no new jobs". Not that Liberals or NDP are much different. I'm just saying.
shakur420 5 months ago
@shakur420 I like what Tim is saying but he is too polite and quiet about it.
With the liberals e-health, ecotax, green energy crap etc, Tim has lots of ammo that he never uses. I also think this $10,000. grant to hire new Canadians is pure bullshit and stupid but again Tim is not yelling enough.
Just like John Tory, Tim is going to grab defeat from the jaws of victory.
We can not continue to increase spending when we don't have the income to support it. Stop daycare and kindergarden etc.
justanoldman1 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 What you're describing is the destruction of social services - the only reason for having a government. The idea that we don't have money for social spending - kindergarten, healthcare, daycare, welfare, etc. is the propaganda of the wealthy. The wealthy don't care about subsidized healthcare because they can afford $500/week on it. Why do we have one of the lowest corporate tax rates in the world (federal)? That's why we don't have revenue, not because of kindergarten.
shakur420 5 months ago
@shakur420 OK I guess you want our country to turn into another Greece or be as bankruped as the States are.
It is basic encomonics, you can not spend more than you have without it bittingyou in the ass.
Even with our lower rates(which are still too high) companies are moving their operations to third world countries for lower salaries. You idea of increasing the min wage will only speed things up even more.
Try to find anything made in Canada, even our candy business has moved to Mexico.
justanoldman1 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 Greece happened because they took Reaganomics to the extreme. Do your homework before you try to teach. People stopped paying taxes because they had enough of state subsidies to the rich - Or do you not consider corporate bailouts to be state subsidies to the rich?
shakur420 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 Your entire narrative ignores one simple thing. Giving money to the rich does not create jobs. Regulation will prevent capital flight. All successful economies (U.S., Japan-centered Asia and Germany-centered Europe) have used immense regulation to control capital movements, to prevent the closing of factories, the exporting of jobs and capital. Read, learn, don't quote me rhetoric from rich politicians. Learn before you preach and you might not look so foolish.
shakur420 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 Look at history. South Korea used to have the death penalty for certain amounts of capital flight. The U.S. is one of the most highly regulated economies on the planet. Your, or rather, the wealthy's narrative that higher corporate taxes will result in capital flight ignores the obvious, assumes that we can't think for ourselves. How do you prevent capital flight? Regulation. lol. It's not rocket science. It's basic, first grade economics. You might wanna look it up.
shakur420 5 months ago
@shakur420 The government is not there to take care of us, they are there to run the country. It is up to us to take care of ourselves. Like President Kennedy said " ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country,"
We are growing generations of lazy bums that do not want to work uless they get huge salaries. We can not even find any workers to pick our fruit or work our farms, they are all socialists like you.
justanoldman1 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 Try not quoting a mass murdering psychopath and I might just take the reference seriously.
shakur420 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 Try not quoting a mass murdering psychopath and I might just take the reference seriously.
shakur420 5 months ago
@shakur420 You really consider President Kennedy a mass murdering psychopath? I have nothing more to say to you.
justanoldman1 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 Kennedy was a mass murderer.Anyone with a minimal understanding of history recognizes basic facts. Indochina, 3 million slaughtered and attacked with chemical warfare. Cuba attacked overtly and covertly through U.S.-funded terrorist operations (terrorists condemned by the FBI, I might add), followed by one of the worst economic attacks in history. All illegal under the Nuremberg principles, if you care at all for international law. Do your homework. Seriously.
shakur420 4 months ago
@shakur420 You really consider President Kennedy a mass murdering psychopath? I have nothing more to say to you.
justanoldman1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shakur420 You really consider President Kennedy a mass murdering psychopath? I have nothing more to say to you.
justanoldman1 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 The solution to the problems of everyday people is to increase social spending, raise corporate taxes, lower military budgets and eliminate tax havens/incentives for the wealthy and corporate sector. This is understood by every economist and political commentator on the planet. Reaganomics, or "top down/trickle down economics" does not work for the working/middle/lower classes. It enriches the wealthy who create no jobs for us.
shakur420 5 months ago
@shakur420 The solution is to ban unions and have people work for a living. Unions workers are a bad joke. The post office is a perfect example of this, most only work 2 hours a day but collect 8 hours pay.
In every hospital the cleaning staff are the same, they sleep at night and play cards during the day, they do not clean the rooms.
We need insentives like west jet has, give everyone a profit share so they really work and not try to get away with the least amount of work.
justanoldman1 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 HAHA. Unions correlate with democratic advancement. It's a fact of history. Unions are what protect the working class. Think about it. Unions protect the workers, give the workers leverage over the owners. Workers represent the masses, owners represent the minority who own everything. We need collective organization in order to level the playing field when dealing with people who hold enormous amounts of capital. It's fundamental socio-economics.
shakur420 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 HAHA. Unions correlate with democratic advancement. It's a fact of history. Unions are what protect the working class. Think about it. Unions protect the workers, give the workers leverage over the owners. Workers represent the masses, owners represent the minority who own everything. We need collective organization in order to level the playing field when dealing with people who hold enormous amounts of capital. It's fundamental socio-economics.
shakur420 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 Your twisted version of "libertarianism" is upside down. Go back to the classic, Adam Smith. He would reject your notion that unions need to go, that people are "lazy". He recognized the immense need for regulation by the government on the part of the citizenry to protect our interests from the greed of the "merchants and manufacturers' - the corporate sector of the day. Read a book or something, it might help you understand basic economics.
shakur420 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 Reaganomics has always been presented as "stimulating the economy" which is true. It increases trade, development and creates soaring profits - for the wealthy. It does not increase a single thing for the average citizen, this is also well known and openly admitted by those who talk of "stimulating the economy". By "stimulation", they mean "soaring profits" for corporations and the wealthy. This is well understood and never denied or debated by anyone with any credibility.
shakur420 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 I mentioned a clear, applicable source. Google "ccpa no new jobs". The report was released this year and completely, uncontroversially, demonstrates that Harper's attempt at applying Reaganomics to Canada in the last few years (by dropping corporate tax cuts to some of the lowest in the world) has created no new jobs, in other words, done nothing for people like me and you (unless you're a troll working for the PC party).
shakur420 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 As if the massive failure (for the middle/working class) of Reagan and Thatcher's policies wasn't proof enough that enriching the wealthy does not help us, we now have more than enough documentation about our own situation. When we lower corporate taxes to "attract capital", that capital is not used for the benefit of the population, rather it's used to enrich the already wealthy. The numbers don't lie.
shakur420 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 If you want to "stimulate" the economy, in a way that will benefit the middle/working class, the solutions are well known. You raise corporate taxes, lower interests rates, increase social spending and programs. You stimulate the population to spend by giving them money, increasing minimum wage, lowering the taxes of lower/middle income families. This generates spending and stimulates the economy in real terms. Terms that help the population.
shakur420 5 months ago
@shakur420 Spoken like a true socialist.
justanoldman1 5 months ago
@justanoldman1 Uh, yeah. "Socialism" means worker's control over production. You know, those who work in the factories should own them, in the words of U.S. workers in the 1800s. Socialist economic principles (workers having control of economic policies) is the only viable way to achieve Democracy in a society, at least that our species knows of. Why do you think rich people support highly regulated Capitalism and poor people support worker's control? Do the math. And your homework.
shakur420 4 months ago
@shakur420 Well the socialist countries around the world are all going into bankrupcty because when workers are in charge and or unions are in charge, no one wants to work and the country goes to pot.
Unions had their day but now the answer is profit sharing, like westjet does, that way people work hard but share in the profits. Unions and socialism do not work, their time is gone.
justanoldman1 4 months ago
@justanoldman1 Again, research. You won't appear so uninformed and ridiculous. "Socialism" means workers control over production - not putting the words "socialist" in the name of your political party. What "socialist" governments do you speak of? Do you even know what the cold war was about? Have you read the NSC documents outlining the the threats in the 40s, 50s and 60s? The threat of "a good example" (Cuba), the threat of "independence" (Vietnam, Egypt)? Do you know the basics?
shakur420 4 months ago
@justanoldman1 "Unions had their day". Exactly, in the 40s and 50s, when the concentration of wealth was not so concentrated, when there was more popular participation in government, when the U.S. was not the worst of all the industrialized countries, as it is today (standard of living). It's proven that the stronger labor organization is, the more democratic a country is. Google it.
shakur420 4 months ago
@justanoldman1 So, what do you mean by "socialist" countries? Venezuela? More democratic than our country, more social spending, economic growth and a rising standard of living for it's people. Cuba? Praised by economists all over the world for it's unprecedented success to formulate economic policy while under such brutal violent and economic attack. Also, provides the most doctors to the international world, thanks to their education system.
shakur420 4 months ago
@justanoldman1 Though, I don't think Cuba and Venezuela fit the definition of "socialist", as workers do not control the economy. They have command economies, like us, the states and every other developed country. What makes them "socialist"? Because CBC says so? lol. Anyways, the only truly "socialist" initiatives, manifested on any significant scale have been Spain (civil war), Russia (pre-Bolshivek), Paris Communes and the many Native American societies who were here before us.
shakur420 4 months ago
@shakur420 We were talking about Canada. None of the political parties are addressing the issue of the deficit and ever growing debt. Ontario has a debt of over 230 billion dollars and the liberal government is always offering new programs so they can spend even more money they don't have. What I have said is why start new costly programs like all day kindergarden etc. when the cost of government is growing 8% per year and the GDP has only grown by 10% over the last 8 years.
justanoldman1 4 months ago
@justanoldman1 Yeah, we're talking about Canada. That still doesn't change basic economic principles. "Deficits" are not a bad thing. States are supposed to run on deficits. How do people like me and you buy a house (and then buy a bigger house)? By going into debt. We can do it, but the government can't? HAHA. Scaring people about the deficit is a way to slash social services (like the debt ceiling drama that was going on in the U.S. a few weeks back).
shakur420 4 months ago
@justanoldman1 Presenting the deficit as an indication that we "can't afford" social spending is an old, instantly recognizable tactic to implement regressive taxes. So, they will cut transit (and kindergarten) funding, and as a result, the poor get an increase in taxes. Transit is a tax for us. Rich people have cars, limos, company vehicles, the poor use transit. An increase in fees because of a lack of funding is called a "regressive tax" - a tax on the poor, look it up.
shakur420 4 months ago
@justanoldman1 Now, if you do want to tackle the deficit, you address the revenues, the income. This is business 101. If you want growth in a company, you don't cut costs, you increase revenue. If you want to simply increase your profits, then sure, cut costs, lower your margins, you don't care about growth. For growth, you increase revenues. It's well known how to raise revenues and increase - not decrease - the standard of living (social spending). Tax the wealthy and corporations.
shakur420 4 months ago
@justanoldman1 They wanna deal with the deficit? They know how. Raise taxes on the wealthy and increase corporate taxes, eliminate overseas tax havens, etc. Our federal corporate tax rate is like 18% (soon to be 15%, the lowest in the world). It's funny, like I already mentioned, Reaganomics (and "Thatcherism") already devastated the middle/working class, yet people still tow the line. Do your homework and see what economists say about job creation, stimulation, etc., not politicians.
shakur420 4 months ago
@justanoldman1 And before you talk about "job loss" were we to tax the wealthy correctly, remember, like every other successful economy, we can install capital controls to prevent flight and the export of production. If Canadian companies "close down" their operations, we can nationalize their production and run it ourselves (in the unlikely even tthat there aren't smaller companies around who are more than ready to fill the void).
shakur420 4 months ago
@shakur420 Well a lot of the companies that closed was because their products were no longer needed, i.e. the pulp and paper companies that produced newsprint. We now use very little paper.
We live in a global world and our costs are just too high, a perfect example is Wendy's, 99 cents hamburgers in the States, 1.89 here, New cars, about 4,000 dollars more in Canada even though they are imported from Korea or Japan. Our min. wage is about double that of the States, we can not compete.
justanoldman1 4 months ago
@justanoldman1 Sure we can "compete" (even though I don't know why we have to "compete" in the first place), if we take information from economists instead of politicians. Check history and how the big economies (U.S., Japan and Germany-centered Europe) developed - regulation. Has Wendy's closed because our burgers cost more? I work in a restaurant, I know exactly what you're talking about (our dairy pricing vs the U.S.). It has nothing to do with basic economic principles.
shakur420 4 months ago
@shakur420 Perhaps you are not aware that 70% of our GNP is serving ourselves, i.e. resturants, retails stores building house etc. The other 30% is mostly made up of comodities that other countries buy from us, we really do not have much of a manufacturing industry left, with the exception of autos.
We even have to import workers to pick our fruits and veggies because Canadian won't do that type of work for the money it offers.
justanoldman1 4 months ago
you clearly dont care about working families..your party is taking a hard run at labour proposing to take away our right to arbitration. you cant take away worker rights then openly kiss up to your corporate buddies then lie claiming that you care about working families...i hope Tim Hudak has clean shoes because he spends a lot of time with his foot in his mouth. he is not the man to lead this province. PC equals Canada TEA PARTY!!!!
gmanw3 5 months ago
What about the deficit???? We are going the way of Greece. User fees for health care. 2 year waiting period for OHIP coverage. Incentives for healthylifestyle. Reduce government red tape and useless departments (like Landlord and Tenants, Niagara Escarpment Commission, and Human Rights.)
34eddy67 5 months ago
The "Tea Party" comes to Ontario.
techsupport222 5 months ago
Fuck off you shit
MrVKCA 5 months ago
Calling Canadian citizens "foreign workers"?? There is no way I will vote Tea Party Tim's race baiting politics!
eckid1 5 months ago 19
I am thinking of starting a new party called TWHP "The White Haired Party"
We are all for seniors first, others after we want is our moto we have worked alife time
And want to reap what we soad we have earned it think about it before it is to late
Act now God Bless Canada Ontario and Seniors and others
Chickiebuc
chickiebuck 5 months ago
Everything he's saying about positive change - keeping and creating jobs, standards of education and healthcare - are all things that have improved under the current government. I am a hard-working middle class Ontarian. I didn't vote Liberal in the last election, but I believe they've done a good job. All governments have to make difficult decisions, that's what they're there to do. Remember the last Ontario PC government? Do we really want to go down that road again? I don't think so.
riverwalk86 5 months ago
The "NO COMMENT" Party
FACsNiagara 5 months ago
What a load of crap! This guy is only running on strategy - he has no true vision for Ontario. He's betting on the voters being tired of McGuinty's face (which is true for a lot of us). He talks about all these things he will do, but doesn't say HOW he will do it. Look at the state of Toronto after Mike Harris: it doesn't have enough money to cover the services the province downloaded to it and is making cuts left right and centre. We need real solutions, not Harris' calculating, phony protege!
HappyColouredMarbles 5 months ago 2
Even though McGuinty and Hudak are from different parties, they have one thing in common. They are both liars.
ricorpg 5 months ago
looks like another mike harrison /:
cockbloker21 5 months ago
Go intercourse yourself Tim.
guidess 5 months ago
just another carrier politician.
TimeGod12 5 months ago
Get real.Look at the changing demographics.
guytitanic 5 months ago
From some angles he looks like Andy Bernard.
nicholasperry56 5 months ago
In reference to the pianoXfan comment, The explicit homo references are actually pertinent to the absurdly homo-misogyny demented traditions that McGuinty has based his career on. It's often thought that men that are not bald are not misogyny but McGuinty is a menstruation misogyny psychopath that simply prioritized revenge at those channels that dared to hit him at as scalp. 45 thousand 30 and 70 channel murders in a province of 13 million is absurdly disproportional murder lust psychopath.
curesriches 5 months ago
He's talking about tax cuts but he's not talking about fair taxes. If the rich don't pay their fair share of taxes who do you think the money is going to come from?
The working class, thats who. It will come out of your social programs, our of school funding, out of hospital cuts out of the social safety net that holds us together.
It will be taken from the working class and given to his corporate pals. Anyway how the hell can Hudak do his job from under the desk of the corporate elite?
KerrysBoys 5 months ago
Im voting for the blue cuz dip shit liberal fucked us up the ass
Quote " I WONT RAISE TAXES"
Day 1 in office (no joke) taxes go up.
Srsly? u said u wont then u do?
I think the PC will lie the least and attempt not to ass rape us with taxes so thats why I voted for them at the federal and thats why ima vote for em at the provincial.
Damn liberals can suck a dick.
BTW THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHOULD INVESTIGATE XPLORNET FOR BREECH OF CONTRACT FOR POLICIES MADE EFFECTIVE APRIL 2011
PianoXfan1 5 months ago
Why did a TED talk suggest this to me?
dunkalunk 5 months ago
NDP
TASSOS502 5 months ago 2
Tim Hudak = Blue Liberal
maclovindotca 5 months ago
I always try and be as fair and reasonable as possible. I've given the Conservatives credit these past few years for their superior strategies and messages, while the Liberals have floundered. Add to that I don't like Dalton McGuinty, you'd think I'd be for his opponent. Not so. Showing me pictures of happy families is an empty rhetorical gesture. Tell me EXACTLY how you will work for families, SPECIFIC policies that we can hold you to. This is nothing but hot air that promises nothing.
LordOfNothingreally 5 months ago
vote 4 liberal's..say good bye 2 yer job....
chadberry75 5 months ago
i just dont support conservative because of harper
bkingbasil 5 months ago in playlist More videos from ontariopcparty
Try thinking of the conservatives as modest, honest, and straightforward.
fluffybananacake 6 months ago