why clone if we can reproduce naturally? in some way or another there might be discrepancies that can occur during cloning. There is no specimen that is exactly alike.
There are say Approximatly three forms of , and or Spiecies of Elephant still living.
How much live DNA splicing would you realy need to replicat the dead DNA, rather than regrowing it form dead DNA, simply splice it. Like the Way a Chimp has most of the same DNA as you.
This is absolutely preposterous!! The whole theory in general concurs with Olins law of DNA reconstruction which was proved futile. The mammoth has 2 dividing nucleus membranes just like it's close cousin the elephant. In order to clone a mammoth, one would need to transfer cytoplasm from a living mammoth cell to an invertabinary cell with NO Helix structure whatsoever. A much simpler answer is to extract DNA from a mosquito trapped in tree sap like they did in Jurassic Park *bow* "Thank you"
@Murdock129 Yes, in light of some new techniques a team is attempting to clone a woolly mammoth. The predict chance of success is around 40% and the estimated time until we see the live animal, if everything goes well, is about four years. It's very, very cool.
I'm excited at the prospect of one day cloning a wolly mammoth, but all this info becomes lost in translation when im watching Ms. Shapiro shes hot or is it just me? nothing like a fine well educated woman
@ndndnd555 Gee thanks mom, but with all seriousness you need to relax it was meant to be a joke you need to find other things to do then to catch feelings from comments on youtube its sad.
@EstavonCrowaka Ouch! Hostility! Getting a PhD is no joke. What's sad is that you don't recognize that. Also, you called me "Mom". You assume that I am a woman? No need to respond - that would be sad :)
Here's the question that no one seems to be answering or even asking: Should we clone it? Animals don't exist in a vacuum, they are part of an ecosystem. If there is a reasonable amount of space that can be set aside for them, then fine. However, in the US we have a hard enough time trying to exist with the animals that do still exist like large predators. I'd say we should start small: Passenger Pigeons and Carolina Parakeets first, then more ambitous Pleistocene Park projects.
@Saligubung= I say we explore space. Those unfriendly aliens will find us sooner or later. Gotta find the friendly aliens. let's just not land on that planet with the xenomorph eggs.
When the construction of Eukeriotic cells from scratch accurs in about ten or twenty years-and to modify any cell already alive-when teckniques for finding finding all matter of recoverable data(DNA) or other....from all soarces then possible accurately, without flaw...then it's a go to at least realisticly try (O:
@nmbo76jklq i hate to say it man but he didnt. there may have been something like it but there was no giant ape wondering around new york getting shot at by planes and climbing buildings
Much evidence points to that mankind actually played a huge part in the Mammoth's extiction. They large and slow - easy game for the people of that time.
I think bringing back the mammoth would be really important, It would further science and maybe give the species that are now on the verge of extiction a second chance, not to be gone forever.
If we don't manage to blow up or kill off billions from famine or constant war we could learn to save ourselves. I doubt it though. It seems like a bad idea to live forever or bring back species that have been extinct for 65 million years. Maybe we should put our energies into energy resources that will not foul the environment (wind, solar, ect) and space travel a colony on Mars would be the greatest human adventure, that is next to acting less human and learning more from nature.
Humans are a part of nature rather we believe it or not(we are an animal ). Our actions, whatever we do or decide to do is our nature. So, if we destroy or fix("live forever or bring back species") it's what our nature intended. There is no plan for nature we are nature.
Why are all the reply's either smarmy or new-age on this channel? Believe it or not, humans, as a branch of chimps are different than all other species. The fact that you are on You Tube should give you some clue as to why you are different than insects or elephants! Wake up please! Evolution is fact, and humans stand at the precipice of mastering or destroying their collective futures. I do not believe in this programmed BS, so please spare me. We can adapt and overcome our nature, even evolve.
I can't stand that "new-age" bullshit. Wasn't intending to sound "smarmy or new age" my bad. I think as humans we believe we are something different we are something special because of technology.Our ability to adapt and over come quickly is our nature.How do you define nature? "I do not believe in this programmed BS". Nor do I.
I am afraid it is impossible to define "nature" in the space 500 characters. To do so would only yield to confusion. Nature, I will state, is no sacred cow or alter shrouded by a veil. As science unfolds its order and workings it is far from any personification or set of moral constructs, that is it is beyond human sense of right or wrong, good or evil. Man/woman has the unique position in recognition of this and is therefore fully cognizant of our species unique circumstances.
I will also add that genetically we are so close to chimpanzees (a difference of 1.6%) that we are unique in our ability to make art and religion, and finally science, to ponder what our meaning is in terms of "self" as opposed to the concepts of class and religion which existed prior to the 18th century as a model of meaning in humans. The transition in the former illusion to the latter brings us eventually spinning into the cold vacuum of outer space as we search for our chemical origins.
Lol, sure only thing stopping you are laws. Farmers in South America burn forest down all the time to feed their families. Elephants clear large areas of forest and mourn their dead. So, Whats your point. How are you not a product of nature and natural selection? You don't believe our species was just placed here by a magic finger or a space ship do you? The only thing that make humans different are our brains which happen to be a product of.. lets hear it children....Nature.
Elephants clear areas that are NO WHERE near as large as humans.
"You don't believe our species was just placed here by a magic finger or a space ship do you?" I could say I used too. Even if we aren't we evolved into sapient beings we are not part of nature any longer.
And to say that you don't care if people of burning down the whole world is sickening.
The fact that you don't care if people burn down the whole world is sickening.
"How so?"
Cuz we evolved. Once a species relies on technology to shelter itself from the environment and becomes a plague to the rest of the planet, it is no longer natural.
Read: "Are human beings still part of nature" by Craig Hawkins
i really understand where youre coming from ....but isnt the curiosity in you strong enough to overpower the naturalist philosophy?????....im sure its a terrible idea but the little boy in me really doesnt care....I WANNA SEE DINOSAURS!!!!...hehe
Beth....the question is not really "Can you" its "Should you"......these creatures went extinct because it was their time to do so......you ought to think about that before you continue your infospread......
Its not the same at all....I dont think preventing death is the same as bringing something back from the dead....we should do all we can to protect the life that already exists....these creatures died out long before we had anything influential to do with it....
No because its you are human, humans help each other. Humans try to protect endangered species because we currently share this world. We don't need to bring a whole load of extinct animals back so we can have a shit load of other problems
Could it be their time to come back? Is there really a time for any creatures extinction? Who or what decides when it's extinct or when it can come back?
It is natural that all things have an end it has always been this way......once we start to twist these natural laws, not that it hasnt already been done, then we may as well dispense with ethics and morality....why not use eugenics and create a superhuman race then exterminate the ones who are defective?
"It is natural that all things have an end it has always been this way"
-This is not an argument.-
"once we start to twist these natural laws..."
-You mean with things like contraceptives, artificial insemination or sanitation? None of which exist in the natural world. We twist natural laws by domesticating animals. What has been has no relation to what SHOULD be. We have to make judgments about that as we go, not just appeal to the past.-
and your opinion would be what? bring back mamoths? dinosaurs? dead people? create cymeras? or how about a lucas style clone army? these technologies would never be used for the benefit of mankind, they would be invested in by the military and would be used as weapons to control society.....
"It is natural that all things have an end it has always been this way"
again i have to go back to the appendix argument. If my appendix bursts, the natural thing for me to do is die. Its only though an unnatural technological intervention that i might live.
The 'its always been this way' argument is ridiculous and been used against contraceptives, penicillin, vaccinations and women's rights. Just because something *has* always been doesn't mean it *ought* to always be.
lmao, the problem there my friend is, is, that the dodo puts its own egg in another birds nest. If there are nothing but dodos at the farm well, do you see the horrible picture there, lmao.
still, bringing back the bird for the sake of hunting and killing them again?
sounds costly when we have chickens and turkeys that are just as good
and what if we just release the Dodo into the wild? the dodo evolved on an island with no natural predators, and is therefore slow, and unafraid of predators, and now that that particular island is rife with people and predators alike, thered b nowhere to put Dodos safely anyway
We do. Do you really think we should start wasting billions of dollars cloning dinosaurs for a Jurassic Park that will require extreme ammounts of food while people in africa is starving?
she sounds very awkward o_o
piggyfreak06 1 month ago
How many years will be old baby mammoth,beacuse when start cloned sheep doly baby dead with arthritis chronicus.
kju813 2 months ago
why clone if we can reproduce naturally? in some way or another there might be discrepancies that can occur during cloning. There is no specimen that is exactly alike.
happinesson 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
who gives a shit about a hairy elephant
MrElloco1979 4 months ago
Who gives a shit about a hairy elephant
MrElloco1979 4 months ago
one at a time,
live cell, remove one cromezone.
Inject the mamoth cromezone,
Remove the second Elephant cromezone,
Insert the second Mamoth cromezone.
Not realy as complex as you try to make it. do you also work for the catholic diacies?
FireDropTechnologies 5 months ago
There are say Approximatly three forms of , and or Spiecies of Elephant still living.
How much live DNA splicing would you realy need to replicat the dead DNA, rather than regrowing it form dead DNA, simply splice it. Like the Way a Chimp has most of the same DNA as you.
FireDropTechnologies 5 months ago
mammoth HA probably harmful as a elephant
ThePurpPuffer 7 months ago
This is absolutely preposterous!! The whole theory in general concurs with Olins law of DNA reconstruction which was proved futile. The mammoth has 2 dividing nucleus membranes just like it's close cousin the elephant. In order to clone a mammoth, one would need to transfer cytoplasm from a living mammoth cell to an invertabinary cell with NO Helix structure whatsoever. A much simpler answer is to extract DNA from a mosquito trapped in tree sap like they did in Jurassic Park *bow* "Thank you"
rollinghills22 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SIMPLY`;'COPY``;&.';PASTE:''
WWW.NEWMOVIESNOW.TK
SIMPLY.:'COPY`,.&;:`PASTE`,.
TannerMarrero 8 months ago
I believe they are gonna do this now aren't they?
Murdock129 10 months ago
@Murdock129 Yes, in light of some new techniques a team is attempting to clone a woolly mammoth. The predict chance of success is around 40% and the estimated time until we see the live animal, if everything goes well, is about four years. It's very, very cool.
BuzzinFr0g 8 months ago
oh I wanted to see the baby mammoth :( they should have shown the slides of the powerpoint
karianaperarg 11 months ago
Nice booty on this Beth Shapiro
evilzpet 11 months ago
Resurrecting Megalania: Can We Do It?
watch?v=uKbR1bcze8A
JohananRaatz 1 year ago
The Dare Island Enigma is an adventure novel concerning the Tasmanian Globster that was foind in the early sixties see video book trailer
dltanner99 1 year ago
Shes a cutie.
CrownOfTheTown 1 year ago 4
@CrownOfTheTown Sadly that's what I was most focused on the whole time...I suppose I've been single a bit too long, eh? :P lol
sonbuhitsunei 9 months ago
She's a charismatic speaker :)
77rxpharmacy 1 year ago
I'm excited at the prospect of one day cloning a wolly mammoth, but all this info becomes lost in translation when im watching Ms. Shapiro shes hot or is it just me? nothing like a fine well educated woman
EstavonCrowaka 1 year ago
@EstavonCrowaka Dr. Shapiro or Professor Shapiro. Just because she's hot doesn't mean she didn't earn the degree or the academic position. Respect!
ndndnd555 11 months ago
@ndndnd555 Gee thanks mom, but with all seriousness you need to relax it was meant to be a joke you need to find other things to do then to catch feelings from comments on youtube its sad.
EstavonCrowaka 11 months ago
@EstavonCrowaka Ouch! Hostility! Getting a PhD is no joke. What's sad is that you don't recognize that. Also, you called me "Mom". You assume that I am a woman? No need to respond - that would be sad :)
ndndnd555 11 months ago
@ndndnd555 I would say more but theres no point because you'll take it out of context and assume hence me calling you mom anyway im done with this.
EstavonCrowaka 11 months ago
Here's the question that no one seems to be answering or even asking: Should we clone it? Animals don't exist in a vacuum, they are part of an ecosystem. If there is a reasonable amount of space that can be set aside for them, then fine. However, in the US we have a hard enough time trying to exist with the animals that do still exist like large predators. I'd say we should start small: Passenger Pigeons and Carolina Parakeets first, then more ambitous Pleistocene Park projects.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
holy shit.... is that einstein in the background?
nemothablak 1 year ago
did you ever watch 'Star Trek' Some aliens aren't friendly to humans. Does that mean we don't explore space?
Saligubung 1 year ago
@Saligubung= I say we explore space. Those unfriendly aliens will find us sooner or later. Gotta find the friendly aliens. let's just not land on that planet with the xenomorph eggs.
vigo894 1 year ago
this is fucking retarded. why would the japanese wanna close something as dangerous as a mammoth. did they not watch JURRASIC PARK????
thebuckrogers22 1 year ago
she has a lovely accent
journeymanjim 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My sister find to marry someone gettop5.info
twannanakashima 1 year ago
sexy voice.........mamasita....
MikeSoccerFreeStyle 1 year ago
NEW ANSWER: Breed elephants with bears!!!
guyontheend 1 year ago
hmm i wanna clone myself so i can lock one of me in a room and make it do my homework!!!!
hugslyh 1 year ago
@hugslyh its probley going two be in hatie
nmbo76jklq 1 year ago
@nmbo76jklq ? explain hatie
hugslyh 1 year ago
you could always match it against elephant dna to more or less get things in the right location.
PinkProgram 1 year ago
they should clone a t rex then take it to a christian church and see if they coexist
TIMETODIE99 1 year ago
@TIMETODIE99= And then they'll take it to your house, and see if it eats you.
vigo894 1 year ago
@TIMETODIE99 lol
hugslyh 1 year ago
k.. ill use this next time i'm i feel like cloning a mammoth.
elvensbane 1 year ago
she is so funy and energetic it wold be awsome if we oneday clone a mamath or even beter a dinosaur
calebisin 1 year ago
A man named vector something put together a brand new custom genome into a bacteria cell. So cloning a mammoth is not to far away.
gamecheatmaster123 1 year ago
When the construction of Eukeriotic cells from scratch accurs in about ten or twenty years-and to modify any cell already alive-when teckniques for finding finding all matter of recoverable data(DNA) or other....from all soarces then possible accurately, without flaw...then it's a go to at least realisticly try (O:
geoffreyah 1 year ago
clone a raptore
nmbo76jklq 1 year ago
I wanna see dead extinct animals in my life time!! he he!-it sucks when your computer doesn't work huh?
geoffreyah 1 year ago
@geoffreyah bring back a tiranosouse rex and king kong
nmbo76jklq 1 year ago
@nmbo76jklq King Kong is fictional. He never existed
NSPcrazYKABK112 1 year ago
@NSPcrazYKABK112 yes he did
nmbo76jklq 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nmbo76jklq Do you have any proof?
NSPcrazYKABK112 1 year ago
@nmbo76jklq i hate to say it man but he didnt. there may have been something like it but there was no giant ape wondering around new york getting shot at by planes and climbing buildings
hugslyh 1 year ago
yes or no what is it
haloperro31 2 years ago
View too much Jurassic Park..movie, the T-Rex will turn her into food......
Drdump1 2 years ago
i am dissapoint..... i doubt i will c any cloning of extinct animals in my lifetime
lailum 2 years ago
what a about frozen mamoth found in discovey chanel
benjieastig29 2 years ago
@benjieastig29 wut about congo
nmbo76jklq 1 year ago
@lailum dude did u kno an asian scientist cloned a mice ? and i watched discovery channel today in school and they could clone a mammoth
GodOfDeath12344 2 years ago
@lailum lol get over it
just watch jurassic park
but hay they are cloning frozen rats in japan so wtf its getting more and more possible
hugslyh 2 years ago
if you wantn my advice make the clones and put them like a zoo and u will get ur money back
Bubbles1064 2 years ago
shes a decent teacher....shes cute as well....i really really hope within 20-30 years we will beable to clone dinosaurs
toolkills 2 years ago
where would we put a fuck load of cloned woolly mammoths?
plugindave 2 years ago
ur comment realy made me laff lmao
JuSKallday 2 years ago
Comment removed
sclary9889 2 years ago
is that donald sutherland in the back lol
sclary9889 2 years ago
i hate her sarcastic aproach, it ruins the whole presentation.
lebonpost 2 years ago 3
I agree, she's fucking annoying.
KamiTonberry 2 years ago
A few more years, they say, soon to map the neandrotol man geaneome from old bones-if so the frozen mammoth=great preservation=done soon!! (o*:
geoffreyah 2 years ago
What a Fckin Puzzle Eh? but scientists love big puzzles!! this one is irresistible-in theory it is possible-amazing to pull it off!
geoffreyah 2 years ago
Much evidence points to that mankind actually played a huge part in the Mammoth's extiction. They large and slow - easy game for the people of that time.
I think bringing back the mammoth would be really important, It would further science and maybe give the species that are now on the verge of extiction a second chance, not to be gone forever.
thebbeenn 3 years ago 8
Wut? They actually found out they it WASN'T humans that caused their extinction when they found that Baby Mammoth carcass.
ARandomCanadian 2 years ago
@thebbeenn they will eat us alive
nmbo76jklq 1 year ago
Comment removed
77rxpharmacy 1 year ago
y do we need a mammoth??...apparently they were not able to survive on this earth and were obsolete...i think its not important
peasinacan 3 years ago
I wanted to see the baby Mammoth :(
biscoito1r 3 years ago 2
Kind of a long way of saying "we can't do anything at this point"...
Can I have the 7.5 min of my life back please?
BSRGodfather 3 years ago
i had no idea mammoths were made of ribbon science is fascinating.
adamproskiw 3 years ago
female talk like running rabbit, me want make mammoth, she no hlep1
alano74 3 years ago
<3 Rhodes Scholars
MORECOWB3LL 3 years ago
amazing
WhoRonPaul 3 years ago
delicious morsels of sugary goodness...
Keylimedelight 3 years ago
If we don't manage to blow up or kill off billions from famine or constant war we could learn to save ourselves. I doubt it though. It seems like a bad idea to live forever or bring back species that have been extinct for 65 million years. Maybe we should put our energies into energy resources that will not foul the environment (wind, solar, ect) and space travel a colony on Mars would be the greatest human adventure, that is next to acting less human and learning more from nature.
chopin65 3 years ago
Humans are a part of nature rather we believe it or not(we are an animal ). Our actions, whatever we do or decide to do is our nature. So, if we destroy or fix("live forever or bring back species") it's what our nature intended. There is no plan for nature we are nature.
legendary852004 3 years ago
Why are all the reply's either smarmy or new-age on this channel? Believe it or not, humans, as a branch of chimps are different than all other species. The fact that you are on You Tube should give you some clue as to why you are different than insects or elephants! Wake up please! Evolution is fact, and humans stand at the precipice of mastering or destroying their collective futures. I do not believe in this programmed BS, so please spare me. We can adapt and overcome our nature, even evolve.
chopin65 3 years ago
I can't stand that "new-age" bullshit. Wasn't intending to sound "smarmy or new age" my bad. I think as humans we believe we are something different we are something special because of technology.Our ability to adapt and over come quickly is our nature.How do you define nature? "I do not believe in this programmed BS". Nor do I.
legendary852004 3 years ago
I am afraid it is impossible to define "nature" in the space 500 characters. To do so would only yield to confusion. Nature, I will state, is no sacred cow or alter shrouded by a veil. As science unfolds its order and workings it is far from any personification or set of moral constructs, that is it is beyond human sense of right or wrong, good or evil. Man/woman has the unique position in recognition of this and is therefore fully cognizant of our species unique circumstances.
chopin65 3 years ago
I will also add that genetically we are so close to chimpanzees (a difference of 1.6%) that we are unique in our ability to make art and religion, and finally science, to ponder what our meaning is in terms of "self" as opposed to the concepts of class and religion which existed prior to the 18th century as a model of meaning in humans. The transition in the former illusion to the latter brings us eventually spinning into the cold vacuum of outer space as we search for our chemical origins.
chopin65 3 years ago
legendary852004? SO you mean I can litter all I want? Sweet! Im gonna start fires in the n ational parks. I am part of nature after all. :D
ARandomCanadian 2 years ago
Lol, sure only thing stopping you are laws. Farmers in South America burn forest down all the time to feed their families. Elephants clear large areas of forest and mourn their dead. So, Whats your point. How are you not a product of nature and natural selection? You don't believe our species was just placed here by a magic finger or a space ship do you? The only thing that make humans different are our brains which happen to be a product of.. lets hear it children....Nature.
legendary852004 2 years ago
Elephants clear areas that are NO WHERE near as large as humans.
"You don't believe our species was just placed here by a magic finger or a space ship do you?" I could say I used too. Even if we aren't we evolved into sapient beings we are not part of nature any longer.
And to say that you don't care if people of burning down the whole world is sickening.
ARandomCanadian 2 years ago
"And to say that you don't care if people of burning down the whole world is sickening."
Huh? You have lost me.
"we are not part of nature any longer."
How so?
legendary852004 2 years ago
"Huh? You have lost me."
The fact that you don't care if people burn down the whole world is sickening.
"How so?"
Cuz we evolved. Once a species relies on technology to shelter itself from the environment and becomes a plague to the rest of the planet, it is no longer natural.
Read: "Are human beings still part of nature" by Craig Hawkins
ARandomCanadian 2 years ago
i really understand where youre coming from ....but isnt the curiosity in you strong enough to overpower the naturalist philosophy?????....im sure its a terrible idea but the little boy in me really doesnt care....I WANNA SEE DINOSAURS!!!!...hehe
toolkills 2 years ago 16
same for me ^^
Somehow it's weird to Clone Mammoth cuz they all died so long ago.
But the kid in me wants do see it. <3
Dracmoray 2 years ago
@toolkills were all going two be fuck
nmbo76jklq 1 year ago
@legendary852004 bring back congo
nmbo76jklq 1 year ago
Beth....the question is not really "Can you" its "Should you"......these creatures went extinct because it was their time to do so......you ought to think about that before you continue your infospread......
lumpfish99 3 years ago
And if my appendix bursts its just my time to go?
Keylimedelight 3 years ago
Its not the same at all....I dont think preventing death is the same as bringing something back from the dead....we should do all we can to protect the life that already exists....these creatures died out long before we had anything influential to do with it....
lumpfish99 3 years ago
No because its you are human, humans help each other. Humans try to protect endangered species because we currently share this world. We don't need to bring a whole load of extinct animals back so we can have a shit load of other problems
ARandomCanadian 2 years ago
Could it be their time to come back? Is there really a time for any creatures extinction? Who or what decides when it's extinct or when it can come back?
legendary852004 3 years ago
It is natural that all things have an end it has always been this way......once we start to twist these natural laws, not that it hasnt already been done, then we may as well dispense with ethics and morality....why not use eugenics and create a superhuman race then exterminate the ones who are defective?
lumpfish99 3 years ago
What's immoral about cloning a mammoth?
GeeWeezzz 3 years ago 2
its dead.....simple, once you start its the thin edge of a wedge that could easily lead to a brave new world of which we would not be a part of....
lumpfish99 3 years ago
"It is natural that all things have an end it has always been this way"
-This is not an argument.-
"once we start to twist these natural laws..."
-You mean with things like contraceptives, artificial insemination or sanitation? None of which exist in the natural world. We twist natural laws by domesticating animals. What has been has no relation to what SHOULD be. We have to make judgments about that as we go, not just appeal to the past.-
Keylimedelight 3 years ago 2
and your opinion would be what? bring back mamoths? dinosaurs? dead people? create cymeras? or how about a lucas style clone army? these technologies would never be used for the benefit of mankind, they would be invested in by the military and would be used as weapons to control society.....
lumpfish99 3 years ago
agreed
ARandomCanadian 2 years ago
"It is natural that all things have an end it has always been this way"
again i have to go back to the appendix argument. If my appendix bursts, the natural thing for me to do is die. Its only though an unnatural technological intervention that i might live.
The 'its always been this way' argument is ridiculous and been used against contraceptives, penicillin, vaccinations and women's rights. Just because something *has* always been doesn't mean it *ought* to always be.
Keylimedelight 2 years ago
I'm still a bit confused, how is our use of technology to save a persons life "unnatural" or any technology our species uses for that matter.
I could see how it would be if our technology just showed up out of no where but it didn't. It evolved as we adapted to our environments.
Would a group of early man running a herd of mammoth off a cliff's edge with torch's be unnatural?
What about a beavers dam preventing salmon from reaching their spawning grounds?
Is that Unnatural?
legendary852004 2 years ago
no, it's the way how the hard nature keeps balance in the life tree.
arturconfituur 2 years ago
and what about the life species that the humans destroyed? like the tasmanan tiger? and the dodo?
If we bring those back alive, we can reset our fault.
arturconfituur 2 years ago
knowing mankind we'd probably end up cloning dodos purely for farming
plugindave 2 years ago
What's wrong with that?
We got to eat anyway...
arturconfituur 2 years ago
bringing back a species we already caused the extinction of purely so we can keep on killing it.
it's a bit excessive, no?
besides, the dodo was reported to be pretty bad tasting anyways
plugindave 2 years ago
lmao, the problem there my friend is, is, that the dodo puts its own egg in another birds nest. If there are nothing but dodos at the farm well, do you see the horrible picture there, lmao.
gamertillman 2 years ago
so they become game birds?
still, bringing back the bird for the sake of hunting and killing them again?
sounds costly when we have chickens and turkeys that are just as good
and what if we just release the Dodo into the wild? the dodo evolved on an island with no natural predators, and is therefore slow, and unafraid of predators, and now that that particular island is rife with people and predators alike, thered b nowhere to put Dodos safely anyway
itd b cool to have them back but not fair
plugindave 2 years ago
yh i get u but how du u define natarual are brein has nataural able to du these this so they sre natural in a way
JuSKallday 2 years ago
We do. Do you really think we should start wasting billions of dollars cloning dinosaurs for a Jurassic Park that will require extreme ammounts of food while people in africa is starving?
ARandomCanadian 2 years ago