I love my 328i. Only mod is a Signature Motoring performance intake kit. They run around $170 and add up to 9HP in the E46 323/325/328 and up to 13.9HP in the 330. That's about $17/per extra HP... A good value for the extra oomph. General HP increases are shown:
Id be pissed if it didnt seeing that it has a turbo..has a chip so its running more boost and may have exhaust and CAI to go along with. Good kill but I would hope that it would beat a most-likely stock M3
are volvo drivers the dumbest in the world or is it just the comments here? when woul u ever try to race a bimmer in your power range,too scared to shit your pants wet uhh? always racing a chipped or modded piece of crap volvo against a stock bimmer and still can't win.what a shame of a car,go try it stock and have your ass served to u for dinner.
"piece of crap volvo". wtf you talking about????? S60R is much NICER car all round, better interior, solid build, AWD, 5 Cyclinder Growl and Turbocharged.
Yes BMW make faster cars, but calling Volvo crap is just retarded. Citroen is crap...... Volvo? lol....... not crap.
I love my 328i. Only mod is a Signature Motoring performance intake kit. They run around $170 and add up to 9HP in the E46 323/325/328 and up to 13.9HP in the 330. That's about $17/per extra HP... A good value for the extra oomph. General HP increases are shown:
well let me just say that all was in favor of the volvo,first the m3 was an smg,which is slightly slower,second it was a convertible which is way hevier then the regular m3,like 300lbs diference.so all in all i think the regular manual m3 would keep up or even pull a bit on the volvo,good run nonetheless..
@durin23 Well let me just say you are wrong about smg, it was developed to shift faster than a manual trans. Also you are blaming the loss on 300 pounds? The 2 door lost to the 4 door that had an extra person in it. Don't use weight as an excuse.
The e46 m3's engine is pretty much maxed out already, so unless you SC or HPF your e46 m3, it will never beat a s60R. Theres just no way, the s60r is superiour when it comes to a stock engine tune. A turbo platform is more diverse comapred to NA, with stock engine mods.
But the s60R will not be able to touch a stock E9X M3 (2008-now...). Thats where volvo is going in the wrong direction in discontinuing the s60r line. Most carmanufactures are creating faster cars, except volvo.
@SchnellM3 but then again.. The s54b32 in the bimmer isn't really close to maxed out. With only a chip u can get up to 360hp, which is 20hp gain.. Pretty much for a N/A "maxed out" engine, huh?
Put on some headers, sport/race exhaust, better intake and then chip it. U will be hunting for the 380 line then ;)
Which is like 50hp more than it's in the US as stock... And this video seems like it's coming from there ;)
Tho i agree with you about turbo being far greater than N/A and not comparible...
Any douche with a trust fund can buy an m3 and they often do. Tuned volvo is more dedicated since there are far less aftermarkets available. I built my exhaust ot $80 that rivals any $800 one out there. Peeps pay way too much for a piece of tubing! Get a saws-all and a welding torch and save $700. The s60r is a better balance for me, as the ride is adjustable with push of button, m3 rides hard all the time.
Should have more video... Having owned BMW and currently s60r, I would agree lb for lb, m3 should be faster, however a chipped Volvo still "counts" since the price of the m3 still outweighs the cost of Volvo plus mods. I've beaten m's and others. Overall it's 50:50 that m owners will be douche:unskilled Volvo r mybe 70/30 ;)
So...your excuse for the reason it lost is because it carries basically the same weight as 1 passenger? Hehe...OK. If that makes you feel better. FYI, those 2 cars weigh within ~80 lbs of one another (3693 lbs vs 3780 lbs).
I think brad v8 got his as handed to him by a Volvo, he leaves more comments on Volvo videos than BMW vids, haha. Compensation always help a weak mind
the m3 did not win that goddamn race, if you know anything about volvos it was just beginning. He would have had 5 car lengths on him in the next 20 seconds. Rookies
+50 hp added to 05-06 S60R dogomatic with torque limiter.
'06 removed limiter adding +50hp
BSR chip will simulate '06 in a dogo
Not sure about '06 manual making +50hp with a BSR ECU tune. I know the 335i flash make 360ft lb torque, add race pipes and intake and 101petrol to free up another +20
Still if you beat someone in a volvo it feels good...if you beat someone in a bmw it's no big deal cause you look like an ass in one and chances are your an ass just like bradv8
hey why dont you tell everyone on youtube how fast and cool bmw's are again i dont think you made your point clear enough yet
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
if those numbers are correct - ur a loser for counting them! And ur also a fkn ignorant retard who thinks a Volvo can beat anything! lol ignorance is bliss - u dont have facts just smart ass comments and insults.. I guess thats all u have cos u know ur wrong or just an ignorant fool
Why torture youself watching Volvo vids beating BMWs? You must be total "JOKE" in day to day life... You are by far the biggest loser on YouTube!!!!!!!!!
get over yourself and stop suckin ur own dick no one takes you seriosly anymore your a typical bmw driver asshole who thinks there better than everyone else
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
haha go read the facts idiot.. the S60R is NOT faster - its like crying over why a Honda Civic cant beat an S60R! Why? It just cant (standard) its not fast enough same ...story here idiot. This S60R is modded so dosnt count! Put a turbo on the M3 wtch the Volvo driver say .. .aw shit.
bradv8 u need to stop fighting everyone like a lil girl all u do is comment about how good bmw is, mainly because u worked for them, how does someone like u even find time with all ur speeches and comments about how much volvo sucks shouldn't u be out driving ur m3 and don't care wht people say about it. I personally wouldn't give two shyts about others opinions if i was as ignorant as u. But dont make me stop u from ur little wars online u fcking pussy
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
your an 18 year old little twat - go learn how to drive before even commenting here. Its funny you think it takes ages to post comments on here. Takes all of 5 fkn seconds.
The M3 has SMG? Why is he lifting off the gas??? You put the gas down and you bang the gears when the tach tells you... red line evey time. This guy was not using all the M3's power.
Listen to it....SAD... the dude cant drive...Watch my videos. I have the M3 with SMG! Dud didnt even get close to red line. All the power is on the top! Were do you live.... we should do another run.
BrdaV8 don't like turbos because his m3 don't have turbo.. but BMW now understand and now even have the 335 with turbos... is a "cheap" way to give power and performance to the cars...
If BMW now understand why has the M3, M5 and M6 all non turbo.. ass clown. Good cars dont need turbos. The Enzo.. the DBS..Zonda, CCX McLaren F1 - Turbo is just an easyer way to get power. Its much harder and more expensive to have a fast non turbo car. In the same way would you rather have a cheap easy suit or a top of the line Hugo Boss suit. Think about that. Class vs cheap.
you say "good cars dont need turbos". So the Buggati with 4 turbos is a bad car? the new bmw x6 with a biturbo is a bad car?. The turbo is not an "easy" way to get power, is an SMART option.... both TURBOCHARGED and SUPERCHARGED are new technology to improve performance in huge values. a cool example is you can have a pc with ddr or ddr2 memory. DDR2 is more expensive but not better than ddr2... ddr2 is a new tech and give you better performance with less cost. agree?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
LOL dont even try and compar the Bugatti with the S60R Didnt say turbos are bad cars anyways. I said an engine with the same power as a turbo rival shows a better quality engine. Fact. Go talk to a engineer.
I'm not comparing an S60R with a Buggatti. The same you cannot compare your M3 with a Buggatti either. You cannot even compare other supersport cars with the buggatti because the buggati is a crazy stuff (BTW the Buggatti have 4 turbos!)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
also for the record.. turbos and Superchargers are not new tech lol. Been around for YEARS.. You knw my point was only about standard cars.. which case im correct. End of story.
Turbo engines and Turbo tech have lot of years, but BMW always refuse it to use it like you refuse it to accept it! But now BMW are going smart and is adding turbos to all the new production cars...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
thanks for the update big ben. It is a cheaper way to get power. I think the word should have been cheaper not cheap. lol and a Bugatti is hardly a normal example.. is it buddy.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I think it was pritty clear I was saying straping a turbo on a car is a easyer way to get power fast. Rather than highly tweeeeeeeeeeeeking an N.A engine.
You see? Turbo is not a cheap way to get power and performance, is an "smart" add-on to good engines. If BMW make good engines, imagine that with no a single turbo, but a couple of them!!....
Hey my friend I off coarse know bmw and mercedes are better cars. But still the volvos are somewhat cheaper and at least they have improved both in design and engine-wise an so on. I am buying the s40 t5 and I am gonna tune it up. I wont stand a chance against many faster bmw:s and other cars but at least I will have a descent car. Yes, I know you hate volvos. But that is not my problem. By the way I build xc90,xc70,v70 and s80. Have a good day Brad and don´t hate too much now.
What we can also say is I could show you a Subaru WRX with a chip STILL costs less than half an S60R standard and will rape in a drag an M3 and S60R chiped.. hell I could show u a Honda Civic beat a Ferrari - still costs less than the Ferrari 2. That mean Hondas are better? LOL il leave u 2 think over that one. Key words here are NON TURBO! Learn more about engines before trying to answer that..
yes but people are calling that TYPE of car faster. Clearly the MODDED WRX or S60R or whatever can beat a STOCK STANDARD wtever - be it a Ferrari, BMW or Audi.. or anythign. All that means is the single modded car - which is now NOT standard so cannto be treated as a standard car or a brand rep. Once its modded it is a custom car and cannot be counted as a normal car. Its like me rocking up to a race with a turbo kit on my M3 and saying... yip this is a normal M3.. well im sorry its not
not really. Its modded so dosnt count. Thats like me saying aw that Honda with a huge turbo upgrade beat your Volvo! But it dosnt matter its modded. Right>? fk wit.
Im not saying THAT S60R didnt beat THAT M3. Im saying if both cars are STOCK the M3 blows the doors off the S60R on all performance tests. But CLEARLY if you MOD the Volvo it can win. But who cares. I could mod a bloody Civic make it beat a S60R or a Aston Martin DSB! That mean the Civic is better? Cos it costs less? uhhhh HELL NO! Its just been modded. Im saying if you wanted to race me in a standard S60R id kill you in my standard M3. Thats that. Its fact and not opinion.
That's a rash assumption; both cars are close enough in power, and the R is just as fit suspension wise to be more than competent in the bends. Neither would be a clear winner on a road course. Nice work putting a thumbs down on my comment, too; I'm sure the Internet appreciates your critical review.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Not an assumption mate. I own an E46 M3 and iv driven two S60Rs - hard - so I know what they can do. The R is not so competent it the bends. Hense the M3s 3.2 second win (if you know motor sport you will know how HUGE even 1 second is) on the Top Gear test track. I must say I also have had the same out come of races iv had here.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I have raced a number of stock S60Rs - one was organised with friends and we have 3 - 4 runs of whch I won all four and with a very clear win. Sorry I dont see any thumbs downs bud.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
U realise Audis TT is faster on the track than the S60R! And the S60R isnt even in production any longer due to poor sales - while the M3 is still the worlds number one selling sports car.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
In its class the M3 is the best selling smart ass. Nice to see you have taken the other facts on board. Personally I wouldnt call a bloody Mazda Miata's aka MX5 a sports car haha. They are so slow its not funny. They just look like sports cars. Kinda like a standard Porsche boxter.. not quick cars.
Hahaha, you're so lost in your ignorance, I'm not even gonna bother presenting more facts. Have fun with your M3. The only way you could look any stupider was if you told me it was an SMG.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
HAHHA thats why your so fucking bitter! you own a bloody Mazda MX5! Why on earth you would upload a vid of that thing revin I havnt any idea! They are so slow its pethetic. lol your so lost its fucking sad. You clearly know nothing about motor sport or German performance cars.. or well performance cars to be blunt. Why a different transmission in a car would matter I have no idea! Especially seeing as the S60R Volvo is a fucking automatic.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Have you even driven a 330Ci? let alone an M3? Or an S60R? Ur car is worth nothing - its slow, ugly and old. How can you even think you can comment on cars you havnt driven. U know nothing of a car untill you have driven it. Your a joke. Driving your buddys BMW 318ti dosnt count btw.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I love your comments ther classic of a dumb kid with a slow car who thinks hes the "car guy" U know nothing. I used to work for BMW btw .. what do u do? Wash cars for $10 outside WALLMART or somthing?
You wanna see what only 0.2 seconds 0 - 100 makes - view the E60 M5 vs the new RS4 (the M5 walks away from the RS4 like its nothing) and the RS4 is only 0.2 seconds slower 0 - 100. It shows you just how much that small difference really is on a race. Then at higher speeds the difference is even more! Hence the 3.2 seconds slower time. So 5.2 vs 5.7 or even 5.5 is acturly alot.
Just because Volvo dont make any car that even beats BMW's slowest sports car the M coupe. Hows that mean they lack.. Volvo lack mate. They said the S60 R is an M3 rival.. that one didnt work out so well - its slower off the line.. slower stoper.. slower on a track.. its less advanced, its turbo while the BMW's are non turbo, it also sounds like crap and its a safe semi sporty almost 530.
YOu are wrong. for example the new bmw 335i is bi-turbo. The m3 is a super car for me, but the s60R with some small mods is a very good car. Remember this car have two intercoolers and a big turbo.
A 335 can beat the old m3 (this one you see in the video). The new one (V8)... is other stuff... remember the 335 WITHOUT mods get 5.5 0-100. With just a filter and sport exhaust you get 5 flat! And with ecu update, you get 4.5 ~ 4.6.
chipping the s60R isnt so much as chipping it as it is de-chipping it, the s60r engine is more than capable of making the 400bhp that it makes after chipping it, but volvo obviously didnt want it to have 400bhp, and therefore made it as a 300bhp car for various reasons i'm sure, mainly safety i'm guessing. bmw feel the need to make them as powerfull as possible because they are found lacking elsewhere. the 4.4l S80 V8 can be retuned upto 430bhp but they make it as a comfortable 315bhp
lol shows how little you know. BMW M3 has been voted best car world wide over ten times (even this year when it wasnt even in production) best stght 6 ever made a few awards for that one 2. The M5 makes 507bhp! So who gvs a toss about an S80 which may be able to make 430bhp if your lucky after its modded. And modded cars dont count.. cos if u wanna mod a Volvo why not mod the M5 or M3 - see what happens. Iv seen a M3 pulling 800bhp.
BMW has just made "the most advanced road engine ever made" in the new V8 M3. So how is it lacking else where? BMWs market for the M cars is a market that demand to end - and that means power. BMW rivals Audi and Merc! Not Volvo. Volvos is down the food chain chump. BMW SMG box rivals the Ferraris F1. Whats a Volvo ever done.
ok then, firstly i wasnt talking about modding cars i was talking about de-limiting them, you can mod any car to be anything you want if you have the time and money so you're right they dont count,
secondly an 800bhp m3 is rediculous, it wouldnt be able to move or steer without serious modding which would no longer make it an m3.
thirdly, the m3 has an engine, great, thats all it has, its boring to look at, uninspired, unsafe, (before 2002 dangerously unsafe) and uncomfortable,
finally, we all know bmw put alot of stock behind their racing, and volvo dont, however when they have done they have rinsed the lot, back when the pv444 used to race other cars wouldnt bother starting the race knowing they couldnt beat it, and more recently in the BTCC they have won the championship more often than bmw, they just dont make a big deal about it like bmw do becuase they dont need to use that to sell cars.
lol your only point is Volvos are safe, End of the day the M3 is faster.. thanks for that lolng convo about how u dislike BMW with no real proof. Just you dont like the styling. I dont know how you think a boxy slower nerds car is cooler but each to ther own I guess. lol uninspired.. with the best stght 6 ever made driving it. Volvo had to slap a turbo on.. and it didnt help much did it.
And how is the Volvo an amzing car.. its an average performer with very average looks, its safe and runs just fine and yeah it is fast. But its nothing you would bother to talk about in a convo.. its just ok. Good sakes my old ladys 545 would give it a good run let alone mine or my old mans M5. Volvo dont use racing to sell ther cars not because of the history.. because they dont make fast cars and performance car nutz dont drive volvos. lol sorry buddy.
My friend have S60R with brembo brakes (stock)and the BSR update, he add the evolve exhaust kit and the Heico filter. He is getting 436HP with a 2000 usd investment and have now a crazy torque, he is beating M3's and other good cars around.
My point - which you just proved - was the M3 is faster standard. And it is. The 335 is not faster than the E46 M3. Yeah your rite! With a few small mods it can be - but the same with the M3. Watch the S60R top gear vid - it shows the S60 R get beaten by 3.2 seconds (driven by stig and hes an ex F1 driver) around the top gear track. So M3 is ALOT faster. Anyways. Both cars are good. Also the new M3 with SMG is expectd to be around 4.5 (with no mods - thats just the SMG box) lol
I dont care what you believe is true - this is true. Its fact. Not opinion. The M3 is 5.2 the S60 R is 5.7 (half a second is ALOT in a race) The race with S60 R is on youtube - key words - Top Gear Volvo. It shows the Volvo (driven by a ex F1 driver) finish its best lap 3.2 seconds slower than the E46 M3. Thats a life time in racing. Even 1 second is a life time.
ok ive seen u on almost every m3 or s60r vid about how the m3 is "ALOT" faster. no sorry, in the long run the m3 pulls in front by a little bit, yea it do
This has been flagged as spam show
That volvo is a piece of crap had one once but it was more in the workshop than under my bottom
barse27 3 weeks ago
That volvo is a piece of crap had one once but it was more in the workshop than under my bottom
barse27 3 weeks ago
video too short...
MrFurryface 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I love my 328i. Only mod is a Signature Motoring performance intake kit. They run around $170 and add up to 9HP in the E46 323/325/328 and up to 13.9HP in the 330. That's about $17/per extra HP... A good value for the extra oomph. General HP increases are shown:
E30 series: 6.0-13.4hp gain
E36 series: 5.5-12hp gain
E46 series: 6.0-13.9hp gain
E92 series: 8.5+ hp gain
Z3/Z4 (all): 5.5-13.9hp gain
See my channel videos for action!
BMWPOWER4U 3 months ago
2006 :P but try Bmw 2006 E92
marra001 4 months ago
Id be pissed if it didnt seeing that it has a turbo..has a chip so its running more boost and may have exhaust and CAI to go along with. Good kill but I would hope that it would beat a most-likely stock M3
Jpitcher22 5 months ago
Camera man came at the end... lol.
jaggajatt08 7 months ago
are volvo drivers the dumbest in the world or is it just the comments here? when woul u ever try to race a bimmer in your power range,too scared to shit your pants wet uhh? always racing a chipped or modded piece of crap volvo against a stock bimmer and still can't win.what a shame of a car,go try it stock and have your ass served to u for dinner.
kay19833 7 months ago
@kay19833
"piece of crap volvo". wtf you talking about????? S60R is much NICER car all round, better interior, solid build, AWD, 5 Cyclinder Growl and Turbocharged.
Yes BMW make faster cars, but calling Volvo crap is just retarded. Citroen is crap...... Volvo? lol....... not crap.
T5R92011 7 months ago
Comment removed
ghostmarkings 9 months ago
s60 r had extra passenger and still won
onebadgs400 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I love my 328i. Only mod is a Signature Motoring performance intake kit. They run around $170 and add up to 9HP in the E46 323/325/328 and up to 13.9HP in the 330. That's about $17/per extra HP... A good value for the extra oomph. General HP increases are shown:
E30 series: 6.0-13.4hp gain
E36 series: 5.5-12hp gain
E46 series: 6.0-13.9hp gain
E92 series: 8.5+ hp gain
Z3/Z4 (all): 5.5-13.9hp gain
See my channel videos for action!
BMWPOWER4U 11 months ago
Comment removed
BMWPOWER4U 1 year ago
well let me just say that all was in favor of the volvo,first the m3 was an smg,which is slightly slower,second it was a convertible which is way hevier then the regular m3,like 300lbs diference.so all in all i think the regular manual m3 would keep up or even pull a bit on the volvo,good run nonetheless..
durin23 1 year ago
@durin23 Well let me just say you are wrong about smg, it was developed to shift faster than a manual trans. Also you are blaming the loss on 300 pounds? The 2 door lost to the 4 door that had an extra person in it. Don't use weight as an excuse.
kartmaster 11 months ago
then what happened to the volvo after the 5th gear? we don't deserve to know right? you are pathetic,whoever posted this video.
kay19833 1 year ago
@kay19833 Volvo driver switched to 6th i guess. And of course BMW was left behind.
Suihkis86 1 year ago
@kay19833 It's called 6th, and extremely high speeds.
xNIAC1Nx 1 year ago
The e46 m3's engine is pretty much maxed out already, so unless you SC or HPF your e46 m3, it will never beat a s60R. Theres just no way, the s60r is superiour when it comes to a stock engine tune. A turbo platform is more diverse comapred to NA, with stock engine mods.
But the s60R will not be able to touch a stock E9X M3 (2008-now...). Thats where volvo is going in the wrong direction in discontinuing the s60r line. Most carmanufactures are creating faster cars, except volvo.
SchnellM3 1 year ago
@SchnellM3 why you spamming every video?
TrueWillz 1 year ago
@SchnellM3 but then again.. The s54b32 in the bimmer isn't really close to maxed out. With only a chip u can get up to 360hp, which is 20hp gain.. Pretty much for a N/A "maxed out" engine, huh?
Put on some headers, sport/race exhaust, better intake and then chip it. U will be hunting for the 380 line then ;)
Which is like 50hp more than it's in the US as stock... And this video seems like it's coming from there ;)
Tho i agree with you about turbo being far greater than N/A and not comparible...
Qziny 11 months ago
Any douche with a trust fund can buy an m3 and they often do. Tuned volvo is more dedicated since there are far less aftermarkets available. I built my exhaust ot $80 that rivals any $800 one out there. Peeps pay way too much for a piece of tubing! Get a saws-all and a welding torch and save $700. The s60r is a better balance for me, as the ride is adjustable with push of button, m3 rides hard all the time.
jgochoco 1 year ago
Should have more video... Having owned BMW and currently s60r, I would agree lb for lb, m3 should be faster, however a chipped Volvo still "counts" since the price of the m3 still outweighs the cost of Volvo plus mods. I've beaten m's and others. Overall it's 50:50 that m owners will be douche:unskilled Volvo r mybe 70/30 ;)
jgochoco 1 year ago
volvo=sleeper best shyt ever!
hjchamp04 1 year ago
giev the s60 credit. it runs with m3's like that all day. its a good car. sleeper more than anything else
dante1515 2 years ago 3
I will watch this video just for that scream at the end lol!
jonesboy35757 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
03 SMG conv 5.1 0-60mph .
This guy stalled 1st wrong, SMG has launch control. Press forward 1st, let it go when revs stop @1800 then let go and keep foot on throttle.
Learn to drive, you just got beat by a Volvo sedan jackass
euro944t 2 years ago
For those of you who didnt notice its an E46 M3 Cabrio. Which is about 200-230kg heavier than the Coupé. :)
redlinish 2 years ago
So...your excuse for the reason it lost is because it carries basically the same weight as 1 passenger? Hehe...OK. If that makes you feel better. FYI, those 2 cars weigh within ~80 lbs of one another (3693 lbs vs 3780 lbs).
seanwilliams78 2 years ago
yes at least one EXTRA passenger :)
redlinish 2 years ago
M3 coupe SMG 4.7 0-60sec
Conv SMG 5.1sec
Bone stock 2003 19" new tires
euro944t 2 years ago
haha yh i agree with DukeBlueDevilz1 bmw never give up bmw would rape volvo easly with no problem
maciekbmwm3 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
give me an e46 m3 and i would rape that volvo
DukeBlueDevilz1 2 years ago
if you can't afford the car than you can't afford the parts to mod it and make it faster!!! If you need to be "GIVEN" the M3
kushnugz 2 years ago
Bad driver in S60R
volvofunclub 2 years ago 2
hope volvo will make a new s60r
tonizoran 2 years ago 5
Nice! Volvo 5cyl turbo's rule :-D once again! Oldfolks car? Yearight!! :-D
BlackV40 2 years ago 5
I think brad v8 got his as handed to him by a Volvo, he leaves more comments on Volvo videos than BMW vids, haha. Compensation always help a weak mind
loganis18 2 years ago 4
Yep.
MrTR500 2 years ago
the m3 did not win that goddamn race, if you know anything about volvos it was just beginning. He would have had 5 car lengths on him in the next 20 seconds. Rookies
mark850t 3 years ago 3
Agreed.VOLVO T5's start picking up after a few seconds.They were bareley getting started.
TwiztedTurbo 2 years ago 4
M3 was behind when the race stopped anyway.
seanwilliams78 2 years ago 3
Pussy wont use his launch control or don't know about it
euro944t 2 years ago 2
is this that evolve chip if not please tell me what youve done to it
kadriu3 3 years ago
why didnt the video go until the end...i bet the M3 won that race...anyway still AMG 4life ;)
qsc324 3 years ago
Well, a simple tune of the engine with a chip, and better flowing exhaust will give the S60R around 350bhp.
romajo 3 years ago 2
+50 hp added to 05-06 S60R dogomatic with torque limiter.
'06 removed limiter adding +50hp
BSR chip will simulate '06 in a dogo
Not sure about '06 manual making +50hp with a BSR ECU tune. I know the 335i flash make 360ft lb torque, add race pipes and intake and 101petrol to free up another +20
euro944t 2 years ago
lol i had this account long before i even saw your name on youtube
brrad850r 3 years ago 8
yea you fuckhead you wont even answer me. and im sure you saw this too cause your on youtube 24/7 beatin off to beamers
brrad850r 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
says the guy who made a youtube account trying to diss me cos hes shitty and knows he is wrong! Volvos are AVERAGE cars! They arnt SHIT standard!
BradV8 3 years ago
Still if you beat someone in a volvo it feels good...if you beat someone in a bmw it's no big deal cause you look like an ass in one and chances are your an ass just like bradv8
hey why dont you tell everyone on youtube how fast and cool bmw's are again i dont think you made your point clear enough yet
brrad850r 3 years ago 3
dont see that every day
jrowe6 3 years ago
yo shut the fuck up dude...
veyron2001 3 years ago 22
Last comment for brad v8!!
gpk24 3 years ago 16
A coupe is only a few hundred pounds less! I dont see how it would leave the S60R in the dust??
gpk24 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
an M3 coupe would have left the S60R in the dust
masfirme2 3 years ago
As you can see this is not the case on the video. I believe the s60r had some minor mods (filter or exhaust)
cubanomx2 3 years ago 3
maybe a chip as mentioned in title..........
LesGreek 3 years ago 5
@cubanomx2 As stated in the title, the Volvo has the ECU upgrade. Probably a good 33HP gain
ksimp88 8 months ago
it would have definitely been closer.
especially if it was a smg
magicaljake 3 years ago
@masfirme2 I highly doubt that one.
xNIAC1Nx 1 year ago
@masfirme2 naaa
2417345 11 months ago
@masfirme2 hahahaha yeah ok....
DJRandySky 7 months ago
86 comments and Brad V8 has 38 of them... He must have his computer glued to his fuckin head!!!!
gpk24 3 years ago 14
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if those numbers are correct - ur a loser for counting them! And ur also a fkn ignorant retard who thinks a Volvo can beat anything! lol ignorance is bliss - u dont have facts just smart ass comments and insults.. I guess thats all u have cos u know ur wrong or just an ignorant fool
BradV8 3 years ago
Why torture youself watching Volvo vids beating BMWs? You must be total "JOKE" in day to day life... You are by far the biggest loser on YouTube!!!!!!!!!
gpk24 3 years ago 15
get over yourself and stop suckin ur own dick no one takes you seriosly anymore your a typical bmw driver asshole who thinks there better than everyone else
brrad850r 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
haha go read the facts idiot.. the S60R is NOT faster - its like crying over why a Honda Civic cant beat an S60R! Why? It just cant (standard) its not fast enough same ...story here idiot. This S60R is modded so dosnt count! Put a turbo on the M3 wtch the Volvo driver say .. .aw shit.
BradV8 3 years ago
the volvo has a $300 chip.
a chip is usualy one of the first mods everybody does.
if that m3 had a chip...the volvo still would have beaten it.
and this m3 is the smg.
magicaljake 3 years ago 9
Wait a minute. Are you trying to compare a turbo and a simple chip as equal upgrades? Simply put, that's ridiculous and you're uneducated.
pballer785 3 years ago
Good clip
WilsonBoit 3 years ago 5
Hey Brad V8! Your friends,if you have any? must have a great time winding you up... You take the bait every time!!
gpk24 3 years ago 11
Brad V8 has too much time on his hands. I think he needs to see a shrink about his anger issues and have BIG cry!!
gpk24 3 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cry? stating fact buddy. ur the one who cant hack the fact the S60R isnt that fast.
BradV8 3 years ago
S60R is a 50,000 usd (half m3) and get 5.7 sec stock. Is this not fast?
cubanomx2 3 years ago
He dosnt even own a bmw, and he's probably a 15 year old fat kid with glasses...
pfaaaa 3 years ago 8
is it wrong to be fat, have glasses and being 15 years old?
Fudo94 3 years ago 4
The fact is, the Volvo thats the same price as the equivilant BMW will be faster.
Volvos are better value for money.
Volvo 4 Life.
sgtcht92 3 years ago 5
Agree. If you get 30,000 usd and go to Volvo and BMW and purchase a car, the Volvo will ever wins.
cubanomx2 3 years ago
bradv8 u need to stop fighting everyone like a lil girl all u do is comment about how good bmw is, mainly because u worked for them, how does someone like u even find time with all ur speeches and comments about how much volvo sucks shouldn't u be out driving ur m3 and don't care wht people say about it. I personally wouldn't give two shyts about others opinions if i was as ignorant as u. But dont make me stop u from ur little wars online u fcking pussy
soccerday002 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
your an 18 year old little twat - go learn how to drive before even commenting here. Its funny you think it takes ages to post comments on here. Takes all of 5 fkn seconds.
BradV8 3 years ago
there u are again with ur fighting words just shut up
iRnoCracker 3 years ago 5
The M3 has SMG? Why is he lifting off the gas??? You put the gas down and you bang the gears when the tach tells you... red line evey time. This guy was not using all the M3's power.
rw196666 3 years ago 2
Yeah ok buddy, keep telling yourself that.
ninjagod1337 3 years ago
Listen to it....SAD... the dude cant drive...Watch my videos. I have the M3 with SMG! Dud didnt even get close to red line. All the power is on the top! Were do you live.... we should do another run.
rw196666 3 years ago
To tune a E46 M3 to leave a stage-3 S60 T5 far behind you need to turbo or supercharge it...
So 10-15.000$ is the only thing you need. :-)
My car is equal to a stock M3 with only a 500$ mod and it still half the price compared to the M3.
Do you get the picture... ;-)
moabohed 3 years ago
Yuop, you dont have cash.
NarishmaJr 3 years ago
Even modded, the S60R is half the price compared to a equal equipped E46 M3...
For only a few dollars more the M3 would be 20M behind i the same interval...
moabohed 3 years ago
NICE! But dude, where's the rest?
BobDrums78 3 years ago
Brad v8. I respect you for not liking turbos. Some like turbos and some do not. That´s it.
zlatantillifk 3 years ago
BrdaV8 don't like turbos because his m3 don't have turbo.. but BMW now understand and now even have the 335 with turbos... is a "cheap" way to give power and performance to the cars...
cubanomx2 3 years ago
If BMW now understand why has the M3, M5 and M6 all non turbo.. ass clown. Good cars dont need turbos. The Enzo.. the DBS..Zonda, CCX McLaren F1 - Turbo is just an easyer way to get power. Its much harder and more expensive to have a fast non turbo car. In the same way would you rather have a cheap easy suit or a top of the line Hugo Boss suit. Think about that. Class vs cheap.
BradV8 3 years ago
you say "good cars dont need turbos". So the Buggati with 4 turbos is a bad car? the new bmw x6 with a biturbo is a bad car?. The turbo is not an "easy" way to get power, is an SMART option.... both TURBOCHARGED and SUPERCHARGED are new technology to improve performance in huge values. a cool example is you can have a pc with ddr or ddr2 memory. DDR2 is more expensive but not better than ddr2... ddr2 is a new tech and give you better performance with less cost. agree?
cubanomx2 3 years ago
I mean DDR is more expensive than DDR2... but DDR2 is cheaper but better... new tech.... is the way this is on the real world...
cubanomx2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LOL dont even try and compar the Bugatti with the S60R Didnt say turbos are bad cars anyways. I said an engine with the same power as a turbo rival shows a better quality engine. Fact. Go talk to a engineer.
BradV8 3 years ago
I'm not comparing an S60R with a Buggatti. The same you cannot compare your M3 with a Buggatti either. You cannot even compare other supersport cars with the buggatti because the buggati is a crazy stuff (BTW the Buggatti have 4 turbos!)
cubanomx2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
also for the record.. turbos and Superchargers are not new tech lol. Been around for YEARS.. You knw my point was only about standard cars.. which case im correct. End of story.
BradV8 3 years ago
Turbo engines and Turbo tech have lot of years, but BMW always refuse it to use it like you refuse it to accept it! But now BMW are going smart and is adding turbos to all the new production cars...
cubanomx2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
research*
BradV8 3 years ago
Man, I am sick of seeing your comments- what an ass.
Lovejammer 3 years ago 13
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Look if you Volvo fans cant handel facts.. dont cry because u dont like to hear truth.
Dont race M3's if you dont wanna deal with M3 owners buddy.
BradV8 3 years ago
OOOOO M3 owners so menacing brad. Your such a bad ass..............or just a giant deuche
evil00017 3 years ago 25
@cubanomx2 not entirely true .. in the 80's they used turbos in their 2002 IMSA cars on the track.
DocHymes 1 year ago
and bugatti veyrons are cheap cars ?
prozsx 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah 2.5 mill is fkn cheap...
BradV8 3 years ago
I was sarcastic wasnt it obvious ? youre saying turbo is a cheap way to get power... bugattis arent made cheap.. many other cars too
prozsx 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thanks for the update big ben. It is a cheaper way to get power. I think the word should have been cheaper not cheap. lol and a Bugatti is hardly a normal example.. is it buddy.
BradV8 3 years ago
''thanks for the update big ben'' no prob bro I never let people think wrong dont worry ;)
prozsx 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
think wrong? Sorry?
BradV8 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think it was pritty clear I was saying straping a turbo on a car is a easyer way to get power fast. Rather than highly tweeeeeeeeeeeeking an N.A engine.
BradV8 3 years ago
Brad.
BMW is going smart now adding turbos to 335i, 135i, x6, etc. You will see the M3 on 2011 with two big turbos.
cubanomx2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yea - the next M5 will be twin turbo. 620bhp V10 twin turbo. O yeah.
BradV8 3 years ago
You see? Turbo is not a cheap way to get power and performance, is an "smart" add-on to good engines. If BMW make good engines, imagine that with no a single turbo, but a couple of them!!....
cubanomx2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no older BMW turbos at the time wer some of the best in the world. lol do some reascher bro.
BradV8 3 years ago
then look into awards for best engines.. cars.. see how many that M3 has got and the nice ZERO the S60R has
BradV8 3 years ago
Hey my friend I off coarse know bmw and mercedes are better cars. But still the volvos are somewhat cheaper and at least they have improved both in design and engine-wise an so on. I am buying the s40 t5 and I am gonna tune it up. I wont stand a chance against many faster bmw:s and other cars but at least I will have a descent car. Yes, I know you hate volvos. But that is not my problem. By the way I build xc90,xc70,v70 and s80. Have a good day Brad and don´t hate too much now.
zlatantillifk 3 years ago
What we also can say is that it doesn´t cost that much to chip that volvo and get a lot more power.
zlatantillifk 3 years ago
What we can also say is I could show you a Subaru WRX with a chip STILL costs less than half an S60R standard and will rape in a drag an M3 and S60R chiped.. hell I could show u a Honda Civic beat a Ferrari - still costs less than the Ferrari 2. That mean Hondas are better? LOL il leave u 2 think over that one. Key words here are NON TURBO! Learn more about engines before trying to answer that..
BradV8 3 years ago
It doesn't mean it's better, but it means it's faster. In a drag race, that's all that counts.
ninjagod1337 3 years ago
yes but people are calling that TYPE of car faster. Clearly the MODDED WRX or S60R or whatever can beat a STOCK STANDARD wtever - be it a Ferrari, BMW or Audi.. or anythign. All that means is the single modded car - which is now NOT standard so cannto be treated as a standard car or a brand rep. Once its modded it is a custom car and cannot be counted as a normal car. Its like me rocking up to a race with a turbo kit on my M3 and saying... yip this is a normal M3.. well im sorry its not
BradV8 3 years ago
well this is a video of an s60 beating a m3 so all of your numbers mean nothing :)
mikegsg9 3 years ago
not really. Its modded so dosnt count. Thats like me saying aw that Honda with a huge turbo upgrade beat your Volvo! But it dosnt matter its modded. Right>? fk wit.
BradV8 3 years ago
Yuop, its modded and still the m3 was wery close =) Volvo= shit car
NarishmaJr 3 years ago
Close doesn't count. It lost. Period.
ninjagod1337 3 years ago
the SMG is not so great plus its a convertible, so it going to be slower then a 6 speed coupe.
sixyears 3 years ago
By a third of a second?
ninjagod1337 3 years ago
Im not saying THAT S60R didnt beat THAT M3. Im saying if both cars are STOCK the M3 blows the doors off the S60R on all performance tests. But CLEARLY if you MOD the Volvo it can win. But who cares. I could mod a bloody Civic make it beat a S60R or a Aston Martin DSB! That mean the Civic is better? Cos it costs less? uhhhh HELL NO! Its just been modded. Im saying if you wanted to race me in a standard S60R id kill you in my standard M3. Thats that. Its fact and not opinion.
BradV8 3 years ago
And a track race would see u left red faced.
BradV8 3 years ago
That's a rash assumption; both cars are close enough in power, and the R is just as fit suspension wise to be more than competent in the bends. Neither would be a clear winner on a road course. Nice work putting a thumbs down on my comment, too; I'm sure the Internet appreciates your critical review.
ninjagod1337 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Not an assumption mate. I own an E46 M3 and iv driven two S60Rs - hard - so I know what they can do. The R is not so competent it the bends. Hense the M3s 3.2 second win (if you know motor sport you will know how HUGE even 1 second is) on the Top Gear test track. I must say I also have had the same out come of races iv had here.
BradV8 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have raced a number of stock S60Rs - one was organised with friends and we have 3 - 4 runs of whch I won all four and with a very clear win. Sorry I dont see any thumbs downs bud.
BradV8 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
U realise Audis TT is faster on the track than the S60R! And the S60R isnt even in production any longer due to poor sales - while the M3 is still the worlds number one selling sports car.
BradV8 3 years ago
Heh, sorry. The Mazda Miata's the best selling sports car in the world.
ninjagod1337 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In its class the M3 is the best selling smart ass. Nice to see you have taken the other facts on board. Personally I wouldnt call a bloody Mazda Miata's aka MX5 a sports car haha. They are so slow its not funny. They just look like sports cars. Kinda like a standard Porsche boxter.. not quick cars.
BradV8 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
tho I guess technically the MX5 is a sports car. Hair dressers car more like it. I am thankful for what it did to the performance car world tho!
BradV8 3 years ago
Hahaha, you're so lost in your ignorance, I'm not even gonna bother presenting more facts. Have fun with your M3. The only way you could look any stupider was if you told me it was an SMG.
ninjagod1337 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
HAHHA thats why your so fucking bitter! you own a bloody Mazda MX5! Why on earth you would upload a vid of that thing revin I havnt any idea! They are so slow its pethetic. lol your so lost its fucking sad. You clearly know nothing about motor sport or German performance cars.. or well performance cars to be blunt. Why a different transmission in a car would matter I have no idea! Especially seeing as the S60R Volvo is a fucking automatic.
BradV8 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your not going to present any facts because you have no fucking facts. U havnt made one point so far.
BradV8 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Have you even driven a 330Ci? let alone an M3? Or an S60R? Ur car is worth nothing - its slow, ugly and old. How can you even think you can comment on cars you havnt driven. U know nothing of a car untill you have driven it. Your a joke. Driving your buddys BMW 318ti dosnt count btw.
BradV8 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I love your comments ther classic of a dumb kid with a slow car who thinks hes the "car guy" U know nothing. I used to work for BMW btw .. what do u do? Wash cars for $10 outside WALLMART or somthing?
BradV8 3 years ago
yea ^^^^^^ suck it trebek!
soccerday002 3 years ago
nice but if wasnt a convertible the M3 would have pulled like 2 cars in front of the 850
fitnessboyPR 4 years ago 3
cubanomx you're dumb. he's getting more like 360 if that from exhaust, ecu and a filter....
spydye21 4 years ago
i don't understand you... 360?
cubanomx2 4 years ago
What you mean you dont understand 360? Ferrari 360..!
BradV8 4 years ago
sorry, don't understand. be well.
cubanomx2 4 years ago
You wanna see what only 0.2 seconds 0 - 100 makes - view the E60 M5 vs the new RS4 (the M5 walks away from the RS4 like its nothing) and the RS4 is only 0.2 seconds slower 0 - 100. It shows you just how much that small difference really is on a race. Then at higher speeds the difference is even more! Hence the 3.2 seconds slower time. So 5.2 vs 5.7 or even 5.5 is acturly alot.
BradV8 4 years ago
lol m3 is a me too car.
spydye21 4 years ago
Just because Volvo dont make any car that even beats BMW's slowest sports car the M coupe. Hows that mean they lack.. Volvo lack mate. They said the S60 R is an M3 rival.. that one didnt work out so well - its slower off the line.. slower stoper.. slower on a track.. its less advanced, its turbo while the BMW's are non turbo, it also sounds like crap and its a safe semi sporty almost 530.
BradV8 4 years ago
YOu are wrong. for example the new bmw 335i is bi-turbo. The m3 is a super car for me, but the s60R with some small mods is a very good car. Remember this car have two intercoolers and a big turbo.
mexrocdf 4 years ago
mexrocdt ... I know the 335 is twin turbo.. its not an M BMW tho is it. Its not a M Coupe, M3, M5 or M6 is it! lol
BradV8 4 years ago
A 335 can beat the old m3 (this one you see in the video). The new one (V8)... is other stuff... remember the 335 WITHOUT mods get 5.5 0-100. With just a filter and sport exhaust you get 5 flat! And with ecu update, you get 4.5 ~ 4.6.
cubanomx2 4 years ago
chipping the s60R isnt so much as chipping it as it is de-chipping it, the s60r engine is more than capable of making the 400bhp that it makes after chipping it, but volvo obviously didnt want it to have 400bhp, and therefore made it as a 300bhp car for various reasons i'm sure, mainly safety i'm guessing. bmw feel the need to make them as powerfull as possible because they are found lacking elsewhere. the 4.4l S80 V8 can be retuned upto 430bhp but they make it as a comfortable 315bhp
megaangelic 4 years ago
The new S80 sport with V8 engine can provide 478HP with the BSR upgrade, this is a hard punch for any m3 out there.. but the new m3 v8 is crazy...
cubanomx2 4 years ago
lol shows how little you know. BMW M3 has been voted best car world wide over ten times (even this year when it wasnt even in production) best stght 6 ever made a few awards for that one 2. The M5 makes 507bhp! So who gvs a toss about an S80 which may be able to make 430bhp if your lucky after its modded. And modded cars dont count.. cos if u wanna mod a Volvo why not mod the M5 or M3 - see what happens. Iv seen a M3 pulling 800bhp.
BradV8 4 years ago
BMW has just made "the most advanced road engine ever made" in the new V8 M3. So how is it lacking else where? BMWs market for the M cars is a market that demand to end - and that means power. BMW rivals Audi and Merc! Not Volvo. Volvos is down the food chain chump. BMW SMG box rivals the Ferraris F1. Whats a Volvo ever done.
BradV8 4 years ago
Im just going to laugh, i think thats all thats needed really,
megaangelic 4 years ago
cos its all uv got .. cos ur wrong.
BradV8 4 years ago
ok then, firstly i wasnt talking about modding cars i was talking about de-limiting them, you can mod any car to be anything you want if you have the time and money so you're right they dont count,
secondly an 800bhp m3 is rediculous, it wouldnt be able to move or steer without serious modding which would no longer make it an m3.
megaangelic 4 years ago
thirdly, the m3 has an engine, great, thats all it has, its boring to look at, uninspired, unsafe, (before 2002 dangerously unsafe) and uncomfortable,
megaangelic 4 years ago
finally, we all know bmw put alot of stock behind their racing, and volvo dont, however when they have done they have rinsed the lot, back when the pv444 used to race other cars wouldnt bother starting the race knowing they couldnt beat it, and more recently in the BTCC they have won the championship more often than bmw, they just dont make a big deal about it like bmw do becuase they dont need to use that to sell cars.
megaangelic 4 years ago
lol your only point is Volvos are safe, End of the day the M3 is faster.. thanks for that lolng convo about how u dislike BMW with no real proof. Just you dont like the styling. I dont know how you think a boxy slower nerds car is cooler but each to ther own I guess. lol uninspired.. with the best stght 6 ever made driving it. Volvo had to slap a turbo on.. and it didnt help much did it.
BradV8 4 years ago
And how is the Volvo an amzing car.. its an average performer with very average looks, its safe and runs just fine and yeah it is fast. But its nothing you would bother to talk about in a convo.. its just ok. Good sakes my old ladys 545 would give it a good run let alone mine or my old mans M5. Volvo dont use racing to sell ther cars not because of the history.. because they dont make fast cars and performance car nutz dont drive volvos. lol sorry buddy.
BradV8 4 years ago
My friend have S60R with brembo brakes (stock)and the BSR update, he add the evolve exhaust kit and the Heico filter. He is getting 436HP with a 2000 usd investment and have now a crazy torque, he is beating M3's and other good cars around.
cubanomx2 4 years ago
My point - which you just proved - was the M3 is faster standard. And it is. The 335 is not faster than the E46 M3. Yeah your rite! With a few small mods it can be - but the same with the M3. Watch the S60R top gear vid - it shows the S60 R get beaten by 3.2 seconds (driven by stig and hes an ex F1 driver) around the top gear track. So M3 is ALOT faster. Anyways. Both cars are good. Also the new M3 with SMG is expectd to be around 4.5 (with no mods - thats just the SMG box) lol
BradV8 4 years ago
the old m3 is 5.2 sec 0-100 and the s60r is 5.5sec 0-100 (Both stock). I don't believe is a 3.2 sec difference... this is not true!
cubanomx2 4 years ago
I dont care what you believe is true - this is true. Its fact. Not opinion. The M3 is 5.2 the S60 R is 5.7 (half a second is ALOT in a race) The race with S60 R is on youtube - key words - Top Gear Volvo. It shows the Volvo (driven by a ex F1 driver) finish its best lap 3.2 seconds slower than the E46 M3. Thats a life time in racing. Even 1 second is a life time.
BradV8 4 years ago
ok ive seen u on almost every m3 or s60r vid about how the m3 is "ALOT" faster. no sorry, in the long run the m3 pulls in front by a little bit, yea it do