AMDs give great deals on their processors, cheaper boards, and provide the much needed competition for Intel, but come on guys, don't be blind. Current Intel CPUs are MUCH faster than the latest AMD processors. Hopefully Bulldozer is going to change that, but no need to hate on Intel.
@Kloborgg i agree, the top intels are currently quicker than the top amd but when your paying like $1,500 for a top end intel chip and you can build a new box running amd X6, 16GB of ram and a more than capable GFX card for around $1,000 the difference is obvious. i may be slightly out with intel pricing as last time i looked at intel the core 2 extremes were selling for the bargain price of between $1,600 and $2.500
@POPCORN454545 well i actually want to get an ati and nvidia sli. so i can use the power of ati's graphics with nvidia's physx, but i still havnt bought any of the yet. so you think i should get nvidia over ati? i'll think about it
@903harman dude you cant have nvidia card and an ati card in there at the same time and sli them...only nvidia sli's....ati is crossfire...the cards wont be compatable with each other and you might fry em if you try....btw u stated u want atis graphics...nvidia has better graphics by a long shot...get a single gtx 480 from evga....then u get physx and way better graphics
No surprise here, AMD wins as usual. Seems the only thing Intel do these days is add useless gimmicks to their CPUs and bribe a load of benchmarking/review sites.
but ya right avro bellow, intel and AMD were the same campany back in the day and tbh they keep leap frogging each other month after month, no true or clear winner, just personal prefrence
We may as well face facts people, I worked at tigerdirect for a long time and I can tell you that as far as how "good" AMD and Intel are, they're EXACTLY the same! The advantages of one over the other from a performance standpoint is minimal at best and completely insignificant to the pc experience.(You wouldn't be able to tell one over the other) The only difference is value. I built a Phenom II X4 940 system because of price and I also don't want Intel to get a monopoly, that would suck.
and asian people your music sucks ass time to just sit back and listen to american music ya'll are terrible kareoke singers completely tone def and horrible taste in music sounds like a cheesey 1980's german sitcom music or something stick to makin hot girls and playstation 3 and hondas
whatup with all the asian girls i mean dont me wrong i love asian girls but i looks like they are claimin our technology plus yeah with 5x price difference with intel i'd hope they'd have more money to spend on better models but too bad their chips are like a whole 1% better fuck intel and their sexy asian models
Intel fanboys, enjoy your I7 while they last! too bad AMD is catching up to quickly.
I mean, a Phenom II 940 is the same price as one of Intel's dual cores running at 3.2ghz. But sadly there are those who spend more money for a flashy name brand. (I have the Phenom II 940 and I just love it.)
no disrespect to intel, but no way, not for the money. if i was blowing my nose with 100 dollar bills maybe i might get into intel. intel is awesome, but not 4 the money.
AMD& IBM said that it is on track with its 32 nm process and promises that it will use a leading 32 nm highK metal gate technology that no other company or consortium can match. IBM did not provide further details to substantiate this claim, however, Intel has been using its high-K metal gate technology since the introduction of the 45 nm Penryn processors in late 2007
While they are far from actual 22 nm and 32 nm products, it is clear that IBM and its partners are turning up the heat on Intel
sorry, amd isnt for the average user, you have more money than brains, intel just like a sony product 80% maketing and not a big difference in performance. even intels extreme processor best overclocked can do is 5.2 while amd's phenom at 6.5, and for the money ofcourse amd kills intel in every respect. you intel boys are brain washed and cant face the fact that amd is right up there alley with a great processor.
As far as I am concerned, there isn't a motherboard out yet that houses Phenom 940's or Q-series (775) or CI7's in dual socket style. The 940 wasn't designed as a server processor and the predominance of dual socket boards are for server. To clarify: I own a Core2Quad Q6600 @ 2.4Ghz @ 3.2Ghz. I don't know exactly what you have in your system and therefore I can't compare them. The Q6600 doesn't outdo a phenom II 940, but for some dollars less, it stays up there and surpasses it in some fields.
this conversation is pointless...you are holding AMD to a double standard...when ur chip almost makes it its a budget fighter but when mine comes close its crap????? i dont get it. Also that 2 X 4mb L2 throws me a bit.. is it not a true quad core? BTW, saying that your chip costs less then mine is misleading $200 to $220 is not a price difference, its a fucking shipping charge....$220 to $1000 is a huge difference
The CI7 920 is clocked at 2.66Ghz and the Phenom 940 is at 3.0 flat. Based on knowledge of voltage input and some comparisons with average operating temperatures (account for the fact of just plain shitty coolers) The CI7 runs cooler than the phenom 940 which in-turn means longer MTBR. I have to admit the Front Side bus on the 940 is impressive, but comparing the FSB of a phenom 940 and a CI7's QPI is like comparing kittens to baseball.
Sorry, you're right. I meant to say the I7 has higher consumption (wattage) but a lower voltage and amperage requirement. I don't own an I7 920; I have an Intel Q6600 Kentsfield. But to back it up, it's not just a /small/ gain. Four cores with dual threading is way higher than the specification for a four core AMD. However, the Phenom 940 /does/ have 512kb per L2, but 2Mb less L3 than the CI7. The L2 cache has a lower latency and therefore seems a bit more important to me...
its 1/4th the price ...can you honestly tell me 4 940 phenoms 2 would not be a better buy for the average user? i am not aware of a 4 chip motherboard but i have seen dual chip boards and id be willing to say tht 2 940's would take anything the extreme has to offer at half the price. But you stating that you own a q6600 kinda puzzles me...we have been arguing for 2 days now and you dont own ether of the intel chips im talking about? am i to understand you think your chip is better then my 940.
Yes due to the fact that frequency is the ammount of times it is on and off so the more frequency the less time the processor spends with no voltage just not by very much be cause we are talking about billionths of a second here right?
AND! even further than my last few comments, Look at the L2 and L3 cache size - the I7 has 256Kb PER core, not shared. The X3 has 3.5Mb of SHARED L2. The L3 on the I7 is 8Mb shared; The X3 has 3.5Mb of shared L3. Once again, core frequency isn't processor performance.
did i say it was great?...no i said even my x3 can compare to your 300 dollar middle of the road processor and it has one less core....why dont you spout off the specs for your 920 compared to the 940 phenom 2? how do they compare..i know its not fair right, its only 60 bucks cheaper then your golden turd so amd had a unfair advantage in that battle huh....
Ehh. Sorry, but AMD just doesn't have what it takes to keep up with Intel; Intel has got the new I7 965 Extremes and the QPI concept out-does anything AMD has on the market. And i'm sick and tired of hearing "Intel Q series doesn't 'really' have four cores". Yes it does, I can tell you...it does.
wow only 60 dollars more then a unit that smokes its ass....... and my work comp, a X3 runs at 2.6 Ghz so its almost paralleled by the entry lvl tri core phenom 2 it cost me 125 so why is intel better again ???????
Haha. Ok, first off...You're basing processor performance off of the core's frequency; fail. Secondly, The X3 may have higher watt consumption, but it's rated at a lower voltage - lower temperatures. Thirdly, the I7's has four cores and two processing threads each - eight processing threads. Further more, Intel made the revolutionary X58 which has lower consumption, the Quick Path Interconnect, reducing latencies, and allows the utilization of DDR3 Triple Channel. Have I made my point?
if your point is ill pay anything for a small gain in speed then yes... im not measuring performance with the frequency i was stating that they are close and the L2 and L3 are close as well all for less then half the price. The X3 has less watt consumptions,where are u gettin your facts? oh and could you tell me the FSB spec on the 920 i7 dont know much about middle of the road over priced intels...sorry. Why dont we compare the 940 phenom 2 with your baby gemme those specs
@4232267 you can keep your hyperthreaded piece of shit.
its only really 8 cores moving twice as slow. do your homework.
williamkendrick 2 months ago
MSI ftw!
cd1str013r 3 months ago
what??
women and processors
what's the connect?
taejamhaha 5 months ago 2
WTF is this...
patsprankcalls 5 months ago
lol there all scary haha
SteezyJerksEnt 6 months ago
song name please
hd5850 6 months ago
I'm underage but can I get all brands :D
Daxter609 9 months ago
AMDs give great deals on their processors, cheaper boards, and provide the much needed competition for Intel, but come on guys, don't be blind. Current Intel CPUs are MUCH faster than the latest AMD processors. Hopefully Bulldozer is going to change that, but no need to hate on Intel.
Kloborgg 10 months ago 2
@Kloborgg i agree, the top intels are currently quicker than the top amd but when your paying like $1,500 for a top end intel chip and you can build a new box running amd X6, 16GB of ram and a more than capable GFX card for around $1,000 the difference is obvious. i may be slightly out with intel pricing as last time i looked at intel the core 2 extremes were selling for the bargain price of between $1,600 and $2.500
kinga303 7 months ago
None, ill go with SPARC and hope shes not aisian
Dubbzee702 10 months ago
stupid video
Daviaz12 10 months ago
AMD is hot, intel looks like she got more brains ;)
Inzolity 1 year ago
Those slut eyes cost around 30€ for 30min in Germany...But I admit they know their business in massage and *****
AtnikRAPO 1 year ago
Amd is better XD
DarkerSkillz 1 year ago
intel at 0:44 :)
SPECKSPRODUCTION 1 year ago
AMDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
fabiocarsssssss 1 year ago
0:55 i think i would go with MSI lol :P
darklordmelkor 1 year ago 2
@darklordmelkor weeeeell, you could have your MSI mobo with your AMD cpu for hot AMD on MSI action =D
cellphonelightsaber 10 months ago
these girls are chinese shit
GHAI007 1 year ago
am i wrong for saying id take every one in the video and make some freakyi random guy amd intel proscessor orgy lol
ya with a i lol
teamsinkler 1 year ago
I use Intel CPU, but I wanna do AMD.
Meshoooo90 1 year ago
@Meshoooo90 lol. nice!
UltimaOmegaX317 1 year ago
AMD, i current use both but AMD just is more impressive
ChasingFlies 1 year ago
chinise have small boobzzzz and tight pussies they get fuked like 2 times a year i knw frm exprience xD :P
ChromeKid786 1 year ago
Both.
helmet98 1 year ago
AMD is the best.
Jumper8835 1 year ago 2
Intel has bad taste in girls .
InitialJProductions 1 year ago
amd wins. cuz its better.
question: does intel have a 12 core processor for sale? ANYWHERE?
no. lololol.
williamkendrick 1 year ago 13
@williamkendrick amd have a xenon 16 cores x4?
magoburgoz 10 months ago
@williamkendrick sorry is xeon not "xenon"
magoburgoz 10 months ago
@williamkendrick Wait , AMD has a 12 core processor?!
deltalphapwns 7 months ago
@deltalphapwns you dont know? oh yeah, check newegg bro. amd has several :)
they aren't typically used for pc's but they are there.
williamkendrick 2 months ago
AMD 0:45, 0:57 rules !!
Ray0X0 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
Ray0X0 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ray0X0 1 year ago
dont force me!!! i like AMD much more....
starterjb1 1 year ago
@starterjb1 intel is a faster, better cpu tho...
POPCORN454545 1 year ago
Intel and Nvidia
Amd and ATI
blajsad 1 year ago
AMD and ATi
Isjix 1 year ago
@Isjix lol im building a i7 with ati :P
903harman 1 year ago
@903harman
You do know that ATI is faster with AMD and Intel faster with Nvidia?
NatesStudio 1 year ago
@NatesStudio yeh cuz its the same chipset
POPCORN454545 1 year ago
@903harman dont dude build an i7 with a gtx 480 from geforce...its way better
POPCORN454545 1 year ago
@POPCORN454545 well i actually want to get an ati and nvidia sli. so i can use the power of ati's graphics with nvidia's physx, but i still havnt bought any of the yet. so you think i should get nvidia over ati? i'll think about it
903harman 1 year ago
@903harman dude you cant have nvidia card and an ati card in there at the same time and sli them...only nvidia sli's....ati is crossfire...the cards wont be compatable with each other and you might fry em if you try....btw u stated u want atis graphics...nvidia has better graphics by a long shot...get a single gtx 480 from evga....then u get physx and way better graphics
POPCORN454545 1 year ago
@POPCORN454545 dude yes you can you use the ati for video rendering and nvidia for dedicated physx. its possible heres a video go check it out.
/watch?v=9z6LVWGcb-o&feature=related
its not really sli but it uses both.
903harman 1 year ago
@903harman i don t see the point....nvidia is better graphics anyways...just get 2 video cards and dedicate one for the physx
POPCORN454545 1 year ago
(.Y.)
glenitube 1 year ago
a m Double D for the Win.
glenitube 1 year ago
yes....amd girls
darkdoom645 1 year ago
AMD got better girls
Xyb3rTeCh 1 year ago 2
AMD intel is way to expensive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
masskilla469 1 year ago
Haha AMD won ;)
Tutovillage 1 year ago
Intel or AMD...who cares? It means nothing to America for all the wealth associated with the making of these chips is going to China.
jlwade3 1 year ago
im on kntels side til apple adopts AMD
irulethe70s 1 year ago
LOL
jaqb17 1 year ago
AMD is world wide pimp or what
pshanoop 1 year ago
amd win
soho53785 1 year ago
i heard intels gona make a 16 core cpu
xy274 2 years ago
6 core. its already out
i think its the i7 980x
gymfreak0 2 years ago
AMD's is coming in April.
noun12345 1 year ago
@xy274 you heard right,
pacorocks1 1 year ago
@xy274 - virtual 16 cores. It's not as good as 16 real cores, but probably still better than the 12 real cores that AMD will put out.
ArcaneKarma 1 year ago
who sing this song pleaseee
FuerzaVril93 2 years ago
Well AMD has the boing factor here....shame their chips don't follow suit.
Perhaps the next gen will compete with the next gen Intel chips though.
Twisted86 2 years ago
intel gives you better performance. nuff said
Soon2BeLegend 2 years ago
<3 !!! AMD !!! <3
korbland14 2 years ago
i nead to have sex with AMD
halflight777 2 years ago 57
ya its gona be really really hot.....its like guna melt your skin!!!!!!
xy274 2 years ago
@halflight777 heh go ahead stick ur dingdong into the cpu cooler.
MrNudlauge 1 year ago
No surprise here, AMD wins as usual. Seems the only thing Intel do these days is add useless gimmicks to their CPUs and bribe a load of benchmarking/review sites.
angleisthebest 2 years ago 3
AMD HOTTIES
Brownmarine 2 years ago
AMD~
catoon95 2 years ago
quien sabe quien canta esta cancion y como se llama porfa----
obriandhc 2 years ago
WHATS IS THE NAME OF THIS SONG----pleasee
obriandhc 2 years ago
hey whats the name of this song please???????????
damnwindowshopper 2 years ago
Looks like AMD is spending more money on girls than producing cpu's (:
Intel FTW
chakiller36 2 years ago 4
AMD girl look smarter than the intel ones
penihop 2 years ago
AMD kicks ass, intel sucks balls
but ya right avro bellow, intel and AMD were the same campany back in the day and tbh they keep leap frogging each other month after month, no true or clear winner, just personal prefrence
YouVaughany 2 years ago 4
if intel sucks, and amd kick's..... the i'll take one from intel xD
raketenDK 2 years ago 4
cont see shit ... bad video quality ... :(
iqao 2 years ago 3
haha nice one
raketenDK 2 years ago
AMD rulz yea n 4 intel im sorry yea u suck!!
jahi191 2 years ago
intel
nunezhit 2 years ago
We may as well face facts people, I worked at tigerdirect for a long time and I can tell you that as far as how "good" AMD and Intel are, they're EXACTLY the same! The advantages of one over the other from a performance standpoint is minimal at best and completely insignificant to the pc experience.(You wouldn't be able to tell one over the other) The only difference is value. I built a Phenom II X4 940 system because of price and I also don't want Intel to get a monopoly, that would suck.
AvroBellow 2 years ago
The
AMD girls rulz. As for the racist crap show me your bloodline from Adam and Eve. Or excuse me, from your nearest ape realitive?
tehTrItOn 2 years ago 3
eventhough i run an intel cpu and an ati (amd) gpu, i'd still have to go for the amd girl(s)
sicsoma 2 years ago
if theres a filipina in amd id choose amd.. lol
niels2029 2 years ago
fuck all u guys intel i7 extreme rulez its the fastest processor
cosmin989 2 years ago
its however infact the baddest processor ever made for its price.
penihop 2 years ago
AMD over INTEL any day
thegamer589 2 years ago
AMD - ATI Radeon Girls Rullz :)
MasterDOOM2010 2 years ago
what does it matter there all asian execpt for the white amd girls
PAC0TAC0 2 years ago
and asian people your music sucks ass time to just sit back and listen to american music ya'll are terrible kareoke singers completely tone def and horrible taste in music sounds like a cheesey 1980's german sitcom music or something stick to makin hot girls and playstation 3 and hondas
tres311 2 years ago
whatup with all the asian girls i mean dont me wrong i love asian girls but i looks like they are claimin our technology plus yeah with 5x price difference with intel i'd hope they'd have more money to spend on better models but too bad their chips are like a whole 1% better fuck intel and their sexy asian models
tres311 2 years ago
Intel forever....
ac55hy22 2 years ago
I think AMD girls are so cheap like its Chips than Intel
FaulknerCk2 2 years ago
They might be AMD, but you know Intel inside.
undocumentedspot 2 years ago
AMD!!! and asian arnt flat bitches gilga ur a fagg
AZJohny 2 years ago
i7 beats everyting
lidltomat 2 years ago
hmm let me see ... hot girl ... core i7
shoot... you picked the I7 ? lol
Tr1p101 2 years ago
how did you know?
lidltomat 2 years ago
what did uuuu say about asian u such a big racist
megaman2k5 2 years ago
amd
SpeedDaemon3 2 years ago
inte suck for games
amd yeahh
putapci 2 years ago 2
chin chins xd
CoOy4 2 years ago
AMD!
KakashiTheWorrier 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Gross! Flat asian bitches are gross.
Gilgamoosh 2 years ago
AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD
REPOMAN24722 2 years ago
INTEL 4 EVER
INTEL IS THE LEADER
tasos853 2 years ago
and a cheater
CarbonDioxide1990 2 years ago
Which do you like AMD or Intel ?
Man You are nice, becouse most pics are with AMD and 1-2 With Intel :)))))
Which do you like AMD or Intel ?
HELL Yes AMD - ATI Rullz and Best Choice
MasterDOOM2010 2 years ago
What a waste of time!
hgprt12 2 years ago
the best is, taht all these chics dont know anything about intel or AMD products :D
z1pfL 2 years ago 48
0:44 left one so id use intel at that moment :D
sale666 2 years ago
AMD rocks... cant wait for the rumors AMD 'Bulldozer' CPU
silversRAY 3 years ago
Intel fanboys, enjoy your I7 while they last! too bad AMD is catching up to quickly.
I mean, a Phenom II 940 is the same price as one of Intel's dual cores running at 3.2ghz. But sadly there are those who spend more money for a flashy name brand. (I have the Phenom II 940 and I just love it.)
matwardforst 3 years ago
0:14 nice ;)
i've to agree bbirocz540. today amd is as good as intel and that for a lower price.
there are some people who say that one intel's better than two AMDs. Well...
VanHelsing94 3 years ago
no disrespect to intel, but no way, not for the money. if i was blowing my nose with 100 dollar bills maybe i might get into intel. intel is awesome, but not 4 the money.
bbirocz540 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AMD& IBM said that it is on track with its 32 nm process and promises that it will use a leading 32 nm highK metal gate technology that no other company or consortium can match. IBM did not provide further details to substantiate this claim, however, Intel has been using its high-K metal gate technology since the introduction of the 45 nm Penryn processors in late 2007
While they are far from actual 22 nm and 32 nm products, it is clear that IBM and its partners are turning up the heat on Intel
bbirocz540 3 years ago
Comment removed
bbirocz540 3 years ago
Comment removed
bbirocz540 3 years ago
sorry, amd isnt for the average user, you have more money than brains, intel just like a sony product 80% maketing and not a big difference in performance. even intels extreme processor best overclocked can do is 5.2 while amd's phenom at 6.5, and for the money ofcourse amd kills intel in every respect. you intel boys are brain washed and cant face the fact that amd is right up there alley with a great processor.
bbirocz540 3 years ago
bbirocz540,
I AGREE.
enigma067 3 years ago
As far as I am concerned, there isn't a motherboard out yet that houses Phenom 940's or Q-series (775) or CI7's in dual socket style. The 940 wasn't designed as a server processor and the predominance of dual socket boards are for server. To clarify: I own a Core2Quad Q6600 @ 2.4Ghz @ 3.2Ghz. I don't know exactly what you have in your system and therefore I can't compare them. The Q6600 doesn't outdo a phenom II 940, but for some dollars less, it stays up there and surpasses it in some fields.
Projectxmod 3 years ago
this conversation is pointless...you are holding AMD to a double standard...when ur chip almost makes it its a budget fighter but when mine comes close its crap????? i dont get it. Also that 2 X 4mb L2 throws me a bit.. is it not a true quad core? BTW, saying that your chip costs less then mine is misleading $200 to $220 is not a price difference, its a fucking shipping charge....$220 to $1000 is a huge difference
brian4480 3 years ago
The CI7 920 is clocked at 2.66Ghz and the Phenom 940 is at 3.0 flat. Based on knowledge of voltage input and some comparisons with average operating temperatures (account for the fact of just plain shitty coolers) The CI7 runs cooler than the phenom 940 which in-turn means longer MTBR. I have to admit the Front Side bus on the 940 is impressive, but comparing the FSB of a phenom 940 and a CI7's QPI is like comparing kittens to baseball.
Projectxmod 3 years ago
Sorry, you're right. I meant to say the I7 has higher consumption (wattage) but a lower voltage and amperage requirement. I don't own an I7 920; I have an Intel Q6600 Kentsfield. But to back it up, it's not just a /small/ gain. Four cores with dual threading is way higher than the specification for a four core AMD. However, the Phenom 940 /does/ have 512kb per L2, but 2Mb less L3 than the CI7. The L2 cache has a lower latency and therefore seems a bit more important to me...
Projectxmod 3 years ago
its 1/4th the price ...can you honestly tell me 4 940 phenoms 2 would not be a better buy for the average user? i am not aware of a 4 chip motherboard but i have seen dual chip boards and id be willing to say tht 2 940's would take anything the extreme has to offer at half the price. But you stating that you own a q6600 kinda puzzles me...we have been arguing for 2 days now and you dont own ether of the intel chips im talking about? am i to understand you think your chip is better then my 940.
brian4480 3 years ago
voltage x amperage = watts so how does less voltage x less amperage = more watts
narcoti 2 years ago
Isn't power consumption also proportional to frequency?
NerdInHisShoe 2 years ago
Yes due to the fact that frequency is the ammount of times it is on and off so the more frequency the less time the processor spends with no voltage just not by very much be cause we are talking about billionths of a second here right?
narcoti 2 years ago
If I remember correctly, the power consumed due to a gate's capacitance is W = fCV^2, where f is frequency, V is Voltage, and C is capacitance.
NerdInHisShoe 2 years ago
AND! even further than my last few comments, Look at the L2 and L3 cache size - the I7 has 256Kb PER core, not shared. The X3 has 3.5Mb of SHARED L2. The L3 on the I7 is 8Mb shared; The X3 has 3.5Mb of shared L3. Once again, core frequency isn't processor performance.
Projectxmod 3 years ago
Do your homework before you try to make your tri-core look like the third coming of Jesus (Since obviously, Obama was the second...)
Projectxmod 3 years ago
did i say it was great?...no i said even my x3 can compare to your 300 dollar middle of the road processor and it has one less core....why dont you spout off the specs for your 920 compared to the 940 phenom 2? how do they compare..i know its not fair right, its only 60 bucks cheaper then your golden turd so amd had a unfair advantage in that battle huh....
brian4480 3 years ago
now...On the side of the ladies....Where are the Nvidia girls?
Projectxmod 3 years ago
Ehh. Sorry, but AMD just doesn't have what it takes to keep up with Intel; Intel has got the new I7 965 Extremes and the QPI concept out-does anything AMD has on the market. And i'm sick and tired of hearing "Intel Q series doesn't 'really' have four cores". Yes it does, I can tell you...it does.
Projectxmod 3 years ago
but who the fuck needs a processor for 1000$? no one. the new AMD Phenom 2 is more than enough and it has a very good price for its power.
0nkelD0kt0r 3 years ago
Not even, The I7 920 is 2.66Ghz quad core with the QPI and is only 299.99; It's simply unparalleled.
Projectxmod 3 years ago
wow only 60 dollars more then a unit that smokes its ass....... and my work comp, a X3 runs at 2.6 Ghz so its almost paralleled by the entry lvl tri core phenom 2 it cost me 125 so why is intel better again ???????
brian4480 3 years ago
Haha. Ok, first off...You're basing processor performance off of the core's frequency; fail. Secondly, The X3 may have higher watt consumption, but it's rated at a lower voltage - lower temperatures. Thirdly, the I7's has four cores and two processing threads each - eight processing threads. Further more, Intel made the revolutionary X58 which has lower consumption, the Quick Path Interconnect, reducing latencies, and allows the utilization of DDR3 Triple Channel. Have I made my point?
Projectxmod 3 years ago
if your point is ill pay anything for a small gain in speed then yes... im not measuring performance with the frequency i was stating that they are close and the L2 and L3 are close as well all for less then half the price. The X3 has less watt consumptions,where are u gettin your facts? oh and could you tell me the FSB spec on the 920 i7 dont know much about middle of the road over priced intels...sorry. Why dont we compare the 940 phenom 2 with your baby gemme those specs
brian4480 3 years ago
damn i am having a hard time, they are equal....
ajkid93 3 years ago
AMD girls win because they are much 'faster' and 'reliable'... opps! i mean the cpu... sorry...
mellovicious 3 years ago
HA HA
marsamprepair 3 years ago
AMD FTW!!!
bc3t 3 years ago
amd win
mozambi 3 years ago 2
i wud tap both lol
hudders123 3 years ago
^ ^ ^ ^
AMD Phenom X4 9950 Black Edition Quad-Core
amd ftw!
matwardforst 3 years ago
Why can amd never admit that intel has faster Cpus. Its sad.
123456789doorwall 3 years ago
amd says that their cpus give more performance that intel. intel has fasters cpus, but whit multitasking the amd are better.
elbattyluego 3 years ago
and cheaper
wojciech123456 3 years ago
Intel - fast,reliable,expensive
AMD - slow,nonreliable,cheap
CORE956221 3 years ago
Clearly AMD is not reliable- that is why most of the supercomputers have thousands of AMD Opterons in them...
RyanADillon 3 years ago 3
lolololol PWN
brian4480 3 years ago
AMD!!!!
dreadlockcamp 3 years ago 4
a mi me gustan mas las de amd
dx10977 3 years ago
i love all of that..
XD
amirudin920927 3 years ago
Intel girlz rulz the world, AMD are not bad too. :)
bwones 3 years ago
1:00!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jesusgot8ten 3 years ago
intel+mac-
clear love
PeoZao 3 years ago
The Mac is for loser hippie geeks...
thomasward00 3 years ago 3
eew..
screw that im goin back to the old commador64 !
Serpentra40k 3 years ago 3
they all rock
koenie12345 3 years ago
nono, me equivoque. Las rubias de AMD 0:59
veroetrey 3 years ago
ninguna
veroetrey 3 years ago
Comment removed
Josetube05 3 years ago
intel Girl and AMD Brand!
TheArea510 3 years ago
AMD + GREEN = HOT GIRLS
MasterDOOM2010 3 years ago
well ... draw for this match . hahaha XD
sonofliberty08 3 years ago
i really prefer American but go amd and there girls :D
rambow70 3 years ago 5
What song?!
jebus733 3 years ago
AMD have best girls
SMGJohn 3 years ago 4
PUes ganaron las de AMD no??