@yocreo She looks very nice to me. And a lot better then what i see many women wearing today. She dresses like a women her age should. Not like those 40-50 year olds on the housewives of the OC. Nothing more ridiculous then trying to look like your 19 when your 50!
The difference between the and now (or Thatcher & Cameron) is that the power game has shifted.........in those days Thatcher commanded respect through a strong individualistic character and financial and military might........these days and mostly thanks to Labour over the past 13 years, all of the above has been eroded or has been replaced, specifically around middle ground politics mastered by Tony Liar Blair and weakened further by Gordon SlimeBall Liar Brown. Shame.
I can't imagine Mrs T agreeing with GWB to invade Iraq when (a) there was no overwhelming need to (b) Afghanistan was already a theatre against terrorists.
@gbtrat ...pleaaassee! truth to power? she talks about liberty and all those nice words. She implemented the free market policy or what we well know today as Neo-liberalism....which has ended as we well know now, with this amazing and beautiful crisis...which is not her fault directly, but together with Mr Reagan, they created that monster, that do govern all of us today....ooops not all! the 99% only!!! the rest, 1%, tells us what to do, in the name of freedom..as Mss "Iron" Thatcher says here.
No they didn't, it was fine, it's blairs new labour which has fucked our economics up with ridicolous amount of borrowing, millions of unwanted immigrants, bending over to the eurozone countries rules etc.
either you dont know nothing about history or either you r too proud to admit the truth. Go to a library and read first chapter of British politics where Mrs Iron, shows to Commons what do they believe in..by showing them Adams Smith economic's theory (1979)... PS: I suggest you to evolve, more than half of the EU's population (your continent) has been immigrant before.Read & think by your own, you will find out things you not always accept. Regards
@stickytoffeebeatz Are you refusing to accept the demonstrable negative cost externalities associated with immigration in the UK? Increased rents (up by over 100% in the south east over the last decade), larger class sizes and special budgetary requirements (like the huge costs of interpretation) are all inextricably linked to New Labour's insane immigration policies. Immigration has also decimated the labour market (and wages) especially in the lower ranks. Overwhelmingly bad
@gwangjuboy1 why are you bringing THE NEW LABOUR into this? I think, you are misunderstanding the point, coz despite the fact that NEW LABOUR is the same garbage as the Torries. What Im trying to say here, is that CAPITALISM is the worst virus that this planet has ever suffered...not in England..but in the entire world & this woman has helped a lot by introducing A.Smith & Milton Friedman economic theories. Free Market is the reason why there r so many social classes. FOCUS on facts
@stickytoffeebeatz I don't think you have ever read Adam Smith. I don't think that you saw Milton Friedman's last interview either. Both recognised (Friedman later on) that free market transactions often affect third parties and in such cases subsidies and/or sanctions would be necessary. Adam Smith's philosophy was distorted by Thatcher and the propoenents of neo-liberal economic policies. Read what he has to say about education for example.
@gwangjuboy1 You seem 2 know a lot, so please, delight me and tell me why free markt & capitalism is so good...and give me an example of a government which has been succesful with it. Free Market pushes society to greedyness, corruption and over production of goods & services...our society is sick..dont you see it? "free market transactions often affect third parties"...are you talking about the 99%? xcuse me, but the world crisis s the result of this lovely economic policy, try to deny it!
@stickytoffeebeatz The financial crisis was caused by the failure to regulate the private label mortgage securitisation market. As Friedman himself stated, regulation is justifiable when there are negative cost externalities. Greenspan believed that the banks would police themselves but he failed to identify the potential for significant negative cost externalities. He made a huge mistake. Btw, no single country has ever practised the kind of capitalism you are talking about.
@gwangjuboy1 an externality which cost the tax payer a good quantity of millions, but hey! as you and Friedman says, we let things go til shit happens..then and only then it s justifiable 2 regulate! no bad! So,we have to understand Mr Friedman and take it like part of the process and not to worry. Remember that this "externality" has riased more than 20% of unemployment in many countries and that those banks run by moody&cmpany are making countries debt bigger..thnx 2 deregulation
@gwangjuboy1 about Bernanke.. Many hav warned Fed Rsrve & Trsury that the leveraging, credit default swaps & colateralizd debt obligations wer on the verg of dstroyin the wrld economy & that US. Banks wer using thes instrumnts in a fraudulnt maner 2 steal welth frm US.Thes instrumnts r being usd globaly 2 dstroy the global economy 4 the benefit of the elite @ the expense of the mass.This fraud was planed & prpetrated by thos who hav been placed in control of the US.financial system
@stickytoffeebeatz You have somehow inferred from my post that I would have opposed regulation of the private label mortgage securitisation market before the proverbial brpwn stuff hit the fan. This is simply not true. Glass-steigal should never have been repealed. As I said, Greenspan got it wrong.
@gwangjuboy1 whatever you may say about those economic policies wont change the facts....in Island Bernanke wasnt in charge, in Spain with the "housing bubble" same story...and at the end..same conclusion... privatization produces those results, coz thats how we are leaving today. But of course, you still can deny that too. there isnt an economic system good for all, but there is a solution a sustainable resource based economy. A world without interests is a free world. Regards
@stickytoffeebeatz No. Unregulated markets which cause negative cost externalities were the problem. Not all market activity results in negatove cost externalities.
@gwangjuboy1 no, it was a result of years with deregulation by all governments & corrupt central banks (main authorities from a country) .. but what is your point?? is it by any chance the only argument you have to support all this? How bad, need the planet be, to make people like you, think a bit different?
@stickytoffeebeatz Can you read and process information? I am not being obtuse. I have made it VERY clear that I support the regulation of markets from which negative cost externalities result.
@gwangjuboy1 Can you be honest with yourself and talk nonsense about immigrants at the same time? Look, besides talking about economic results..can you read between lines?? coz this is what is all about ...nobody would need to talk about regulation or deregulation if US & UK's governments wouldnt be there f%^&^g things up. besides this. peace, love & loads of respect
@stickytoffeebeatz This is an illogical response to my last post. Also, what did I say about immigration that you disagree with? There are certainly some examples of better immigration policies elsewhere in the world, like Canada for example, but I was criticising UK immigration policy specifically.
@gwangjuboy1 Illogical? not to me, all im trying to say, is that all those social & economic policies are to blame for the problems around the world today. But you seem to defend them, maybe not totally but in a part, coz that s how you started replying to my first comment. thats all.Sorry if I misunderstood anything.You seem to be an inteligent person. Kind regards
@stickytoffeebeatz No. Unregulated markets which cause negative cost externalities were the problem. Not all market activity results in negative cost externalities.
Meryl Streep did a WONDERFUL job playing Maggie. Seriously.
Amberduet 1 week ago
She never told lies, and she truly loved Great Britain, I for one miss her very much.
vincaful 1 week ago
What a helmet she's got for a hair do. She should sue the "beauty salon".
yocreo 2 weeks ago
@yocreo She looks very nice to me. And a lot better then what i see many women wearing today. She dresses like a women her age should. Not like those 40-50 year olds on the housewives of the OC. Nothing more ridiculous then trying to look like your 19 when your 50!
Buffalobigboy69 2 weeks ago
@yocreo
She was immaculately turned out every time you saw her, are you able to say the same?
vincaful 1 week ago
@vincaful is this about a fashion event?
stickytoffeebeatz 3 days ago
The difference between the and now (or Thatcher & Cameron) is that the power game has shifted.........in those days Thatcher commanded respect through a strong individualistic character and financial and military might........these days and mostly thanks to Labour over the past 13 years, all of the above has been eroded or has been replaced, specifically around middle ground politics mastered by Tony Liar Blair and weakened further by Gordon SlimeBall Liar Brown. Shame.
rulebritannia100 3 weeks ago
Miała babka jaja, nie ma co...
Dealven 3 weeks ago
She wants South Africans to let all races and creeds play a part in politics (but that does not happen in Britain either)
hernandocarvalho 4 weeks ago
omg, that lion thing at the beginning
Fillerosopy 1 month ago
I can't imagine Mrs T agreeing with GWB to invade Iraq when (a) there was no overwhelming need to (b) Afghanistan was already a theatre against terrorists.
davey1272250 1 month ago
@davey1272250 What are you talking about? Afghan was already a THEATRE against terrorists? What does that mean????
ttiiyy 1 month ago
The opening was a nice touch! Hahahahaha
ThisHasBeenAlex 1 month ago
she speaks the truth, impressed.
Namami88 1 month ago
no teleprompter, she's freaking amazing!
long live the Iron Lady.
TheJedikai 1 month ago
@TheJedikai She was reading from a script...what is so amazing about that?
aeronuk1 1 month ago
her words are still valueable even today
MrWelsh200 3 months ago
"Weakness never pays." This is a lesson Cameron would do well to learn, though i am certain he will not.
ColonelRoss111 3 months ago 9
The Iron Lady speaking truth to power! Especially on terrorism. How prophetic her words were!
gbtrat 3 months ago 13
@gbtrat ...pleaaassee! truth to power? she talks about liberty and all those nice words. She implemented the free market policy or what we well know today as Neo-liberalism....which has ended as we well know now, with this amazing and beautiful crisis...which is not her fault directly, but together with Mr Reagan, they created that monster, that do govern all of us today....ooops not all! the 99% only!!! the rest, 1%, tells us what to do, in the name of freedom..as Mss "Iron" Thatcher says here.
stickytoffeebeatz 3 months ago
@stickytoffeebeatz
No they didn't, it was fine, it's blairs new labour which has fucked our economics up with ridicolous amount of borrowing, millions of unwanted immigrants, bending over to the eurozone countries rules etc.
403766 1 month ago
@403766
either you dont know nothing about history or either you r too proud to admit the truth. Go to a library and read first chapter of British politics where Mrs Iron, shows to Commons what do they believe in..by showing them Adams Smith economic's theory (1979)... PS: I suggest you to evolve, more than half of the EU's population (your continent) has been immigrant before.Read & think by your own, you will find out things you not always accept. Regards
stickytoffeebeatz 1 month ago
@stickytoffeebeatz Are you refusing to accept the demonstrable negative cost externalities associated with immigration in the UK? Increased rents (up by over 100% in the south east over the last decade), larger class sizes and special budgetary requirements (like the huge costs of interpretation) are all inextricably linked to New Labour's insane immigration policies. Immigration has also decimated the labour market (and wages) especially in the lower ranks. Overwhelmingly bad
gwangjuboy1 3 weeks ago
@gwangjuboy1 why are you bringing THE NEW LABOUR into this? I think, you are misunderstanding the point, coz despite the fact that NEW LABOUR is the same garbage as the Torries. What Im trying to say here, is that CAPITALISM is the worst virus that this planet has ever suffered...not in England..but in the entire world & this woman has helped a lot by introducing A.Smith & Milton Friedman economic theories. Free Market is the reason why there r so many social classes. FOCUS on facts
stickytoffeebeatz 1 week ago
@stickytoffeebeatz I don't think you have ever read Adam Smith. I don't think that you saw Milton Friedman's last interview either. Both recognised (Friedman later on) that free market transactions often affect third parties and in such cases subsidies and/or sanctions would be necessary. Adam Smith's philosophy was distorted by Thatcher and the propoenents of neo-liberal economic policies. Read what he has to say about education for example.
gwangjuboy1 1 week ago
@gwangjuboy1 You seem 2 know a lot, so please, delight me and tell me why free markt & capitalism is so good...and give me an example of a government which has been succesful with it. Free Market pushes society to greedyness, corruption and over production of goods & services...our society is sick..dont you see it? "free market transactions often affect third parties"...are you talking about the 99%? xcuse me, but the world crisis s the result of this lovely economic policy, try to deny it!
stickytoffeebeatz 1 week ago
@stickytoffeebeatz The financial crisis was caused by the failure to regulate the private label mortgage securitisation market. As Friedman himself stated, regulation is justifiable when there are negative cost externalities. Greenspan believed that the banks would police themselves but he failed to identify the potential for significant negative cost externalities. He made a huge mistake. Btw, no single country has ever practised the kind of capitalism you are talking about.
gwangjuboy1 1 week ago
@gwangjuboy1 an externality which cost the tax payer a good quantity of millions, but hey! as you and Friedman says, we let things go til shit happens..then and only then it s justifiable 2 regulate! no bad! So,we have to understand Mr Friedman and take it like part of the process and not to worry. Remember that this "externality" has riased more than 20% of unemployment in many countries and that those banks run by moody&cmpany are making countries debt bigger..thnx 2 deregulation
stickytoffeebeatz 1 week ago
@gwangjuboy1 about Bernanke.. Many hav warned Fed Rsrve & Trsury that the leveraging, credit default swaps & colateralizd debt obligations wer on the verg of dstroyin the wrld economy & that US. Banks wer using thes instrumnts in a fraudulnt maner 2 steal welth frm US.Thes instrumnts r being usd globaly 2 dstroy the global economy 4 the benefit of the elite @ the expense of the mass.This fraud was planed & prpetrated by thos who hav been placed in control of the US.financial system
stickytoffeebeatz 1 week ago
@stickytoffeebeatz You have somehow inferred from my post that I would have opposed regulation of the private label mortgage securitisation market before the proverbial brpwn stuff hit the fan. This is simply not true. Glass-steigal should never have been repealed. As I said, Greenspan got it wrong.
gwangjuboy1 1 week ago
@gwangjuboy1 whatever you may say about those economic policies wont change the facts....in Island Bernanke wasnt in charge, in Spain with the "housing bubble" same story...and at the end..same conclusion... privatization produces those results, coz thats how we are leaving today. But of course, you still can deny that too. there isnt an economic system good for all, but there is a solution a sustainable resource based economy. A world without interests is a free world. Regards
stickytoffeebeatz 1 week ago
@stickytoffeebeatz No. Unregulated markets which cause negative cost externalities were the problem. Not all market activity results in negatove cost externalities.
gwangjuboy1 1 week ago
Comment removed
stickytoffeebeatz 3 days ago
@gwangjuboy1 no, it was a result of years with deregulation by all governments & corrupt central banks (main authorities from a country) .. but what is your point?? is it by any chance the only argument you have to support all this? How bad, need the planet be, to make people like you, think a bit different?
stickytoffeebeatz 3 days ago
@stickytoffeebeatz Can you read and process information? I am not being obtuse. I have made it VERY clear that I support the regulation of markets from which negative cost externalities result.
gwangjuboy1 3 days ago
@gwangjuboy1 Can you be honest with yourself and talk nonsense about immigrants at the same time? Look, besides talking about economic results..can you read between lines?? coz this is what is all about ...nobody would need to talk about regulation or deregulation if US & UK's governments wouldnt be there f%^&^g things up. besides this. peace, love & loads of respect
stickytoffeebeatz 3 days ago
@stickytoffeebeatz This is an illogical response to my last post. Also, what did I say about immigration that you disagree with? There are certainly some examples of better immigration policies elsewhere in the world, like Canada for example, but I was criticising UK immigration policy specifically.
gwangjuboy1 3 days ago
@gwangjuboy1 Illogical? not to me, all im trying to say, is that all those social & economic policies are to blame for the problems around the world today. But you seem to defend them, maybe not totally but in a part, coz that s how you started replying to my first comment. thats all.Sorry if I misunderstood anything.You seem to be an inteligent person. Kind regards
stickytoffeebeatz 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stickytoffeebeatz No. Unregulated markets which cause negative cost externalities were the problem. Not all market activity results in negative cost externalities.
gwangjuboy1 1 week ago
@403766
How right you are
vincaful 1 week ago