Added: 2 years ago
From: YoungApologetics
Views: 612
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No bible supports the trinity read em!

  • I'm a Christian now and I was raised a JW. and you are on the right track. Good Job.. Here. John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Joh 1:2 The same was in the beginning with God. Joh 1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. Joh 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us. So, Who was the word? GOD was.. Who dwelt among us? Jesus did.. So therefore Jesus is GOD..
  • Hey. Thanks!

  • I am a very unintellectual person but I am glad there are people out there that have a brain in there heads to show me the light, man this video is so off the mark, it's Laughable.

  • Sorry did you say you had a bible that translates the KJV of the bible, that knocks this video out of the argument already, that bible is of Latin origin and detracts both definite and indefinite articles, and then its translated to english wow talk about lost in translation, I am so glad to be one of Jehovahs Christian Witnesses, thank goodness for people Like Proffessor Jason David Be duhn, not that he supports a witness cause but at least he shows The NWT to be the most accurate.

  • You attack this guy, what a hypocrite, BTW Latin did not exist as the most widely used language at the time, Greek did, thanks to Alexander the Great, the Bible didn't even enter into the Latin language until they pulled all the GREEK manuscripts together to form it.

  • I don't think you got what I was saying, when I was saying that the Bible was of Latin origin I was talking about the KJV which I view as innacurate, so before you jump down peoples neck and call them a hypocrite, try not to jump to conclusions. thanks for bringing my point accross for me. read the context of the whole conversation next time before butting in.

  • Mate you lack insight and intellect due to you mind set which is corrupted . You have no valid point because you do not understand the fundamental foundation on Christianity.

  • U Guys Are Dumb......Jesus Says Himself In Matthew That He's Not God.......And Satan Says It Too.....In The 3 Temptations....

  • I agree, but intelligence has nothing to do with it. What can we ever know for certain? The philosophy of knowledge, or epistemology, states we cannot be sure of much. We can't even be sure we're not dreaming right now.

    Calling someone dumb because they do not subscribe to your ideology is ignorant and shortsighted. That's why I'm no longer a JW. Religion is just another school of thought perpetuated by faulty reasoning.

  • wow LOL! First you say intelligence has nothing to do with it. Then u talk about a PHILOSIPHY of knowlege STATING something, then u say a reason for not being a JW. So u admit u Rejected intelligence for this philosiphy which states things that "we cant even be sure" of. Sounds like a very stable reasoning

  • Philosophy is the study of wisdom. It's okay if one decides to adopt a particular worldview, but when their ideology becomes based on certainty it is unwise to criticize others that do not share your perspective.

    My beliefs cannot be summed into any particular branch of philosophy. I have my own philosophies, and I am free to think as I wish. I do not need elders or a magazine telling me how to live. That is not trading intelligence for philosophy. It is taking responsibility for your own life.

  • thats fine, beleive wat you want to believe. thats a right Jehovah gave you and all of us. its funny how u say "when their ideology becomes based on CERTAINTY its unwise to critize others." the only one critizing is you and these videos that critizize the witnesses. nuff said

  • Fair enough

  • NWM New World Mistranslation

  • New World Mistranslation!!!! Hahahaha, hell naw

  • Proverbs 8:22-23 is perversed by the NWT. GOD "PRODUCED"? no - its POSSESSED..the hebrew word used here is QANAH which means POSSESSED. one only has to read the 1st 9 chapters and tis WISDOM personified - in woman form - then look at verse 23 - FROM INDEFINITE TIME..so POSSESSED would be the right word..and ti will prove ETERNAL just as the Father..Furthermore - Did Jehovah have to CREATE WISDOM? PRODUCE? NO..he POSSESSED - YES..Then his great wisdom created what is - its his MASTERWORKER !!

  • good luck! Check out Newagegamer!

    You cant back up a Watchtower!

  • "Dead ends of science"? Science works, If it didn't work, things would not work. Evolution is the basis of modern biology, which is also the basis of medicine.

  • Right you are sir! but science cannot prove evolution nore can it prove creation or the Big Bang or "The origins of Species" ..Dead ends my friend

  • Uh antibiotic resistant disease? Nylon eating bacteria? These are "dead end"? We have over 90% of our genes in common with chimps. "Same designer" you say? What about retro-virus DNA? Did God infect our ancestor and the ancestor of modern chimps with exactly the same virus in exactly the same place in the genome? If so, why? If science cannot prove evolution or creation, how can we trust anything it says are true?

  • Just because Science has dead ends does not mean it serves no purpose. I agree with science in many forms of study. However creation is not one of them ..evolution will always have a "missing ling" or "dead end". I can not base my being on the idea of a theory!

  • When science hits a dead end, the theory is thrown out. Does anyone today think that the universe is comprised of earth,air,fire and water? Is Le Marcian evolution taught is biology classes? No one has disproved Darwin, in fact, all the new info proves he was right all along.  Give me a "dead end" sir. Do you have any idea what "theory" means when a scientist uses the word?

  • I read that the new info was working against Darwin. I suppose everyone sees what they want to see.

  • What "new info"? Even if something "worked against" Darwin, so what? Relativity "works against" Newtonian mechanics.

  • The new info that you don't get something out of nothing.

  • Why is that new? And what has that to do with evolution?

  • It isn't new - sorry, I was being ironic, probably because I'm tired and in a bad mood. If there was such a thing as evolution, children would say "Please" and "Thank You" by now, but they don't, so there.

  • I can sympathize on that point but evolution isn't about adding anything new, it's about using what materials you have in different ways. I've heard people say:" where does the 'new' information come from?" 9 times out of 10, nowhere. Much of our DNA is "junk" DNA. In other words, it does nothing at all. There are ways to add DNA of course, retro-virus DNA and the DNA from a different group, that's how bacteria develope antibody resistance.

  • Revelation 1-3 of the NWT establishes that Jesus Christ is Jehovah. Revelation 1:8 when combined with Isaiah 44:6 along with Revelation 2:8 in particular. Jesus Christ was "dead and cam back to life [again]."

    According to Hebrews 1, Jesus Christ can not be the Arch Angel Micheal because he is above all angels.

    Also in Isaiah 44:24 Jehovah declared that he made all things "by myself" but in Colossians 1:15-17 we see that Jesus Christ is Creator.

    Jesus Christ is Jehovah in the Trinity.

  • This should be NO surprise as ALL organized religion has people changing the bible to "taylor fit" the agenda they have! It's ALL POISON!

  • and disorganised religion hasn't?

  • What is disorganized religion? If you mean individuals independently seeking spirituality for themselves and them not running around trying to preach to others or kill others in the name of God then yes!

  • ...but is it really that black and white, i.e. people developing their own religious views (like Adolf Hitler) being "good", and people adhering to the views of an organised religion (like, say Mother Theresa) being "bad"? Yes, I know that is a bit exaggerated, I just wanted to make the point that you can't be so dogmatic about things.

  • what do you know about coptic john 1:1. It use and the word was a god. It was written before the trinity became and doctrine.

  • we know all about that But the old Greek testament they remove the divine name because is spelled something different in there language. They found some old testament Greek bible that did have the divine name. The divine name got replace with lord.

  • I can't believe the WTS actually use this as an argument, language difference is irrelevant words are translated between Chinese and English everyday. There is absolutely no proof to support this claim of mere speculation. Not only that the NWT insertion of Jehovah (from the JW view of who Jehovah is) often is out of context, take Romans 10:13 for example and compare Romans 10:9-14 and with Act 4:8-12.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more