Seems tetrahedra would have duality with two interlocked rings, maybe something like a di-quark, maybe not like a meson. If I were using a fluid dynamics model, it seems surface tension discontinuities would be a prominent phenonenon when it comes to representing binding energies at various scales
My first thought at the moment is why not go with octahedra (2^3 faces) instead of tetrahedra. It's just because I have this nucleon model based on thick tight borromeo rings that empasizes what I perceive as octaherally-arrayed cube-corner-reflector-like mixing zones, where an inter-nucleon reflection-conservative property is analogous to binding energy. Seeing a ring as a depth-gradient mirror helps with this idea. Maybe using octahedra makes no major difference, I can't be sure at this time.
Thanks for posting this video - I'm still going through Rovelli's book on QG, so still have much to learn. Surprised Lubos Motl hasn't spammed this video yet ;)
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
I believe this field of mathematics can be used to model turbulent fluids in 3 dimensions, along with other goodies found in Quantum gravity. Its amazing how similar fluid mechanics is to quantum gravity, just my opinion.
So most of it went right over my head because I'm not hip to the jargon, but I was curious about the 2D nature of space time at small scales. First how small is small? Much smaller than atomic scale I'm assuming. Second what effects would this have on particles/forces?
Thanks for posting this!
atyy73 9 months ago
Seems tetrahedra would have duality with two interlocked rings, maybe something like a di-quark, maybe not like a meson. If I were using a fluid dynamics model, it seems surface tension discontinuities would be a prominent phenonenon when it comes to representing binding energies at various scales
CACBCCCU 10 months ago
My first thought at the moment is why not go with octahedra (2^3 faces) instead of tetrahedra. It's just because I have this nucleon model based on thick tight borromeo rings that empasizes what I perceive as octaherally-arrayed cube-corner-reflector-like mixing zones, where an inter-nucleon reflection-conservative property is analogous to binding energy. Seeing a ring as a depth-gradient mirror helps with this idea. Maybe using octahedra makes no major difference, I can't be sure at this time.
CACBCCCU 10 months ago
Thanks for posting this video - I'm still going through Rovelli's book on QG, so still have much to learn. Surprised Lubos Motl hasn't spammed this video yet ;)
LoopQuantumGravity1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
hungarylnnjsd 1 year ago
I believe this field of mathematics can be used to model turbulent fluids in 3 dimensions, along with other goodies found in Quantum gravity. Its amazing how similar fluid mechanics is to quantum gravity, just my opinion.
EinSofVirtuoso 2 years ago
Thank you.
Poisinn 3 years ago
So most of it went right over my head because I'm not hip to the jargon, but I was curious about the 2D nature of space time at small scales. First how small is small? Much smaller than atomic scale I'm assuming. Second what effects would this have on particles/forces?
studio7manga 3 years ago
I think the scale would be close to Planck length (1.616x10^-35 m).
stevebd1 3 years ago