Yeah, that's the point, it's not an orthodox church, it's a Catholic church, with Catholics celebrating rites that existed before the orthodox created the schism between the Holy Roman Church and the eastern church.
I don't pretend to be Roman Catholic. I am most certainly not under the rule of Rome. The Uniate Churches were created for the express purpose of confusing and proselytizing the Orthodox.
@KabaneTheChristian they weren't "created", they were under the confusion of your bishops and happened to come back to the fold. What do you have to say about the Western Rite Orthodox? Now they were created to entice Anglicans and Catholics into converting to your faith.
The Western Rite was created to accomodate the needs of Western Christians who had expressed a desire to be received into the Church. You've already acknowledged that it doesn't just have to do with Roman Catholics. It had more to do with liturgical Protestants. Nonetheless, the Orthodox Western Rite is not the same as the Tridentine Rite.
@KabaneTheChristian so what? Many of of our liturgies predate the Estern schism.. We still use it and just recently you "Orthodox" decided it might be a neat idea to use it to entice other Westerners. You should read the prayer book of St Ambrose for Western Rite Orthodox. It has many of the same prayers in my Baltimore prayer book. Who copied who?
and I wonder what you refer to when you say "Western Christians"? Might that be Roman Catholics? Oh yeah, I am sure you're going to come back with , "no, I mean liturgical Portestants like the Anglicans"
I mean both. Both had expressed a desire to return to the Church. Yet, we don't dance around the issue. We are not Roman Catholic, we are not under the jurisdiction of the Pope. Uniates are pretend Orthodox. I have heard them call themselves "Orthodox in communion with Rome". One Uniate bishop, Elias Zoghby, professed full belief in the doctrines of the Orthodox Church and denied papal supremacy and infallibility.
Latin-rite Roman Catholics often have this idealized picture of the Uniates, where they believe everything that they do, but are simply using a different liturgical rite. This is not true. There is enormous confusion among the Uniates about doctrine. Most of them support dual communion with the Orthodox Church and the Church of Rome, even if the Orthodox Church and the Church of Rome are not in communion with each other.
@KabaneTheChristian if they believe that then they are in conflict with the Bishop of Rome. The canons of the Eastern Rite churches in union with the bishop of Rome state otherwise. You can look them or I can supply you with a link if you so desire. But, I know that in the middle east intercommunion is tolerated. That is a well-known fact.
I know what the Code of Canons says. That represents what Rome wishes the Uniates were, not what they are. Have you read about the Zoghby Initiative? Zoghby expressly criticized the Code of Canons as an inaccurate portrayal of how the Uniate churches were governed.
I know intercommunion is tolerated, and it is tragic. Intercommunion is a result of unity, not a means to achieve it.
What's your point? They share a common ancestor, the Mass of St. Gregory the Great, which was in use before the schism. But Orthodox recite it in the vernacular, while Roman Catholics recite it in Latin. This alone demonstrates that we aren't trying to confuse anybody. The Uniates try to confuse Orthodox by proclaiming that they are merely "Orthodox in communion with Rome". The Melkites put out this "two point profession of faith"
1. I believe everything which Eastern Orthodoxy teaches.
2. I am in communion with the Bishop of Rome as the first among the bishops, according to the limits recognized by the Holy Fathers of the East during the first millennium, before the separation.
This is intended to confuse the faithful into thinking they can move to a Uniate church and still believe the same thing.
hahah, how so? The Mass of the Western Orthodox Church often doesn't even resemble traditional Roman Catholic Masses, because it uses different Western rites.
Trent based the Tridentine Mass on the Mass of St. Gregory the Great. The two rites, however, are not identical. Furthermore, we use not only the Mass of St. Gregory, but also, and probably more often, the Mass of St. Tikhon the Great, which is a uniquely Orthodox Western rite. Furthermore, our Masses are almost always in the vernacular and a capella, which Tridentine Masses are not. If we were trying to imitate traditional Roman Catholic liturgy, then why are we using the vernacular?
That is because at the Russian Revolution, all these countries sent over their bishops to the United States to establish communities for their faithful here. This has led to the present uncanonical situation and hence, use of non-vernacular languages. The OCA and Antioch in America, however, both use the vernacular. It will be into these two jurisdictions, I predict, that all other American jurisdictions will be united with.
@KabaneTheChristian well, I just want to say that it is not a custom of mine to post comments and I don't intend on dragging this on. If it irks you then I suggest you take it up with the Melkites or other Eastern rite Catholics. For now I will sign off.
Pax Tecum- Peace be with you ...and remember that both of us must strive to always imitate our Lord and Savior.
@KabaneTheChristian so how can you say it's exclusively Orthodox? Some guy revised the Book of Common Prayer (which is based on the Sarum Rite) and then called it "Orthodox". That's about it.
Because it's not in use in any other Christian communion. It was revised in order to conform to Orthodox doctrine, it is not identical to the Book of Common Prayer.
@KabaneTheChristian you should read how the Byzantine Emperor forced other Rites to abandon thier ancient liturgical rites in favor of the Byzantine rite.
Case in ponint: The Antiochian Orthodox didn't use the Byzantine liturgy from the beginnning. Theirs was much older, but were forced to implement the Byzantine Emperor's rite.
@KabaneTheChristian forgive me for my spelling, this coputer of mine is very slow and freezes in the process. I have trouble posting a comment. But tell me, why does this irk you "Orthodox" so much? do you see traditional Latin Catholics criticizing the way you perform the Mass of Pope St Gregory?
It irks us because the Uniates have a history of attempting to proselytize and confuse Orthodox into thinking that Eastern Orthodoxy and Uniatism is the same thing.
they are not orthodox this guys here. there are catholics!!! they should be ashamed of using the way that the orthodox christian celebrate the eucharist. it is a great problem between the orthodox church and the catholic beleive, and the vatican for proselytism reasons and only does not want to solve it!! shame
Not to split hairs, but I believe the Byzantines say they are Orthodox Christians in union with Rome. I looked on the website and that part caught my eye.
This is a Byzantine (formerly Ruthenian or Greek) Catholic liturgy. They have fealty to the pope since the 17th century through a reunity agreement in eastern Czechoslovakia, but they still use the Orthodox liturgies and traditions. It is hoped that they can be a bridge to reestablishing unity with Rome by all Orthodox. This church is part of the Byzantine Catholic Eparchy of Passaic.
The distinct traditions of the Roman vs. Byzantine (and other) churches is a historical miracle. During the 129 years of persecution by various Roman emperors, ALL the Christian Churches went underground. They could no longer openly communicate with each other. After the Edict of Milan in 313, the various traditions emerged SACRAMENTAL INTACT, i.e. SACRAMENTALLY IDENTICAL. This means that the Holy Spirit guided them while they no longer had each other.
This Greek Catholic Mass is beautiful. May God bless the Eastern Catholics and their holy apostolic traditions and may they convert others back to the true Faith of Christ. Forever live Sacred Tradition and the Traditional Latin Mass!!
We Catholics do not, do not, do not believe that the Pope is Christ on Earth. That is a lie and a misrepresentation of what we believe. We do believe he can, in certain limited occasions make infallible statements on matters of faith and morals. Also we believe he has universal jurisdiction over the Church; that is, he has authority to govern and intervene in disputes, problems, etc. as needed. This is not the same as believing the Pope is Christ on Earth--that, of course, would be heretical.
Eastern rite Catholics are very much united with the Church in Rome. It seems Orthodox, because Eastern Catholics have been permitted to keep the Divine Liturgy and their traditions while at the same time united with the whole Catholic Church.
Which really makes no sence because the main reason for the split between the 2 chruches was the idea of the Pope being Christ here on earth. While Orthodox have always said that Christ doesent need a representaive on earth becasue Christ never left. He is always present.
The Eastern Church's reunification with the Western Church does makes sense. More Ecclessial Communities are realizing more and more that the everyone should always be in communion with the Pope, the Bishop of Rome.
Peter is the one entrusted by Christ to hold the keys of the Kingdom, which is a symbol of the position as Christ's Prime Minister on earth. He is the one who alone can bind and loose on earth. All the bishops and faithful are also only capable of binding and loosing only in unity with him in matters of faith and morals.
Let us pray for the unity of the Eastern and the Western Church.
Actually, it was not the person of Saint Peter that the church was built on (and keys of Heaven given to), but his faith when he confessed his belief in Christ. Besides, authority is given to those who have the word of God in their hearts, not necessarily those who have been ordained to the highest and most honoured office (i.e. Bishop of Rome). This has been demonstrated repeatedly throughout history, where archbishops took orders from laymen, and monks gave demands and orders to Emperors.
There can be NO unity between Eastern and Western Churches so long as the Western Church does not address the issue of its faulty Creed which incorporates the "filioque", does not address the Papacy itself which is non-Canonical, and last but never the least, does not address Rome's attempt to bring Orthodox Christians into Rome's orbit through "Uniatism" and Uniate Churches (which is exactly what happened in the Western Ukraine).
you are so wrong! read about the early church and how it was formed. The Orthodox Church alone is the true, incorruptible, Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Hi Vivapink! The Byzantine Church broke with the Western Church before and was part of the Eastern Orthodox Church. But eventually, they united to the Bishop of Rome who is the Pope thus fully uniting themselves to the Catholic Church
Actually, the Eastern Orthodox Church and Roman Catholic Churches are still in schism and will be for probably a long time.
This is a Byzantine Catholic Church, which is a Roman Catholic Church that practice the Byzantine Rite. They are in no way associated with the Eastern Orthodox Church.
its nice to know that there are other filipinos interested in the Byzantine rite divine liturgy. Feel free to join my parish in Anaheim, California. Annunciation Byzantine Catholic Church welcomes all visitors ;D
@vaio720 I don't think they are seeking "Orthodox" approval.
DerrMon 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gucci, prada, chanel handbags.. go grab some!! You would love it [GirlieRewards. INFO)
Aime3072 1 year ago
@Bamafan7202
Pope is only an authoritative name.
CarlosBarrera393 1 year ago
Yeah, that's the point, it's not an orthodox church, it's a Catholic church, with Catholics celebrating rites that existed before the orthodox created the schism between the Holy Roman Church and the eastern church.
Christopher71488 1 year ago
This is an imitation of the Orthodox faith. It looks Orthodox, it sounds Orthodox, but it is not Orthodox.
KabaneTheChristian 1 year ago
@KabaneTheChristian you look Catholic, you act Catholic, but you are not Catholic. You are in schism, schismatic.
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
I don't pretend to be Roman Catholic. I am most certainly not under the rule of Rome. The Uniate Churches were created for the express purpose of confusing and proselytizing the Orthodox.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
@KabaneTheChristian they weren't "created", they were under the confusion of your bishops and happened to come back to the fold. What do you have to say about the Western Rite Orthodox? Now they were created to entice Anglicans and Catholics into converting to your faith.
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
The Western Rite was created to accomodate the needs of Western Christians who had expressed a desire to be received into the Church. You've already acknowledged that it doesn't just have to do with Roman Catholics. It had more to do with liturgical Protestants. Nonetheless, the Orthodox Western Rite is not the same as the Tridentine Rite.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
@KabaneTheChristian I think it has a lot to do with Roman Catholics when they use our ancient liturgical rite, the Mass of Pope St Gregory.
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
The Mass of St. Gregory predates the schism.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
@KabaneTheChristian so what? Many of of our liturgies predate the Estern schism.. We still use it and just recently you "Orthodox" decided it might be a neat idea to use it to entice other Westerners. You should read the prayer book of St Ambrose for Western Rite Orthodox. It has many of the same prayers in my Baltimore prayer book. Who copied who?
DerrMon 10 months ago
and I wonder what you refer to when you say "Western Christians"? Might that be Roman Catholics? Oh yeah, I am sure you're going to come back with , "no, I mean liturgical Portestants like the Anglicans"
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
I mean both. Both had expressed a desire to return to the Church. Yet, we don't dance around the issue. We are not Roman Catholic, we are not under the jurisdiction of the Pope. Uniates are pretend Orthodox. I have heard them call themselves "Orthodox in communion with Rome". One Uniate bishop, Elias Zoghby, professed full belief in the doctrines of the Orthodox Church and denied papal supremacy and infallibility.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
Comment removed
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
Latin-rite Roman Catholics often have this idealized picture of the Uniates, where they believe everything that they do, but are simply using a different liturgical rite. This is not true. There is enormous confusion among the Uniates about doctrine. Most of them support dual communion with the Orthodox Church and the Church of Rome, even if the Orthodox Church and the Church of Rome are not in communion with each other.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
@KabaneTheChristian if they believe that then they are in conflict with the Bishop of Rome. The canons of the Eastern Rite churches in union with the bishop of Rome state otherwise. You can look them or I can supply you with a link if you so desire. But, I know that in the middle east intercommunion is tolerated. That is a well-known fact.
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
I know what the Code of Canons says. That represents what Rome wishes the Uniates were, not what they are. Have you read about the Zoghby Initiative? Zoghby expressly criticized the Code of Canons as an inaccurate portrayal of how the Uniate churches were governed.
I know intercommunion is tolerated, and it is tragic. Intercommunion is a result of unity, not a means to achieve it.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
you should compare the Antichian Orthodox Western Rite Mass to that of the Tridentine Mass. Do it and let me know what you think.
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
What's your point? They share a common ancestor, the Mass of St. Gregory the Great, which was in use before the schism. But Orthodox recite it in the vernacular, while Roman Catholics recite it in Latin. This alone demonstrates that we aren't trying to confuse anybody. The Uniates try to confuse Orthodox by proclaiming that they are merely "Orthodox in communion with Rome". The Melkites put out this "two point profession of faith"
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
@DerrMon
1. I believe everything which Eastern Orthodoxy teaches.
2. I am in communion with the Bishop of Rome as the first among the bishops, according to the limits recognized by the Holy Fathers of the East during the first millennium, before the separation.
This is intended to confuse the faithful into thinking they can move to a Uniate church and still believe the same thing.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
Comment removed
DerrMon 10 months ago
@KabaneTheChristian where you recite the creed do you not say " I believe one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church" ?
DerrMon 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DerrMon
Yes, I do. The Orthodox Church is that One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church in which I confess belief.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
Comment removed
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
hahah, how so? The Mass of the Western Orthodox Church often doesn't even resemble traditional Roman Catholic Masses, because it uses different Western rites.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
@KabaneTheChristian they use the Mass of Pope St Gregory which is what we use in our Tridentine Mass. Do a little research.
DerrMon 10 months ago
Trent based the Tridentine Mass on the Mass of St. Gregory the Great. The two rites, however, are not identical. Furthermore, we use not only the Mass of St. Gregory, but also, and probably more often, the Mass of St. Tikhon the Great, which is a uniquely Orthodox Western rite. Furthermore, our Masses are almost always in the vernacular and a capella, which Tridentine Masses are not. If we were trying to imitate traditional Roman Catholic liturgy, then why are we using the vernacular?
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
@KabaneTheChristian because Orthodox are known to use the vernacular? Russian, Ukranian, Serbian, Greek etc.etc.
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
That is because at the Russian Revolution, all these countries sent over their bishops to the United States to establish communities for their faithful here. This has led to the present uncanonical situation and hence, use of non-vernacular languages. The OCA and Antioch in America, however, both use the vernacular. It will be into these two jurisdictions, I predict, that all other American jurisdictions will be united with.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
@KabaneTheChristian well, I just want to say that it is not a custom of mine to post comments and I don't intend on dragging this on. If it irks you then I suggest you take it up with the Melkites or other Eastern rite Catholics. For now I will sign off.
Pax Tecum- Peace be with you ...and remember that both of us must strive to always imitate our Lord and Savior.
DerrMon 10 months ago
St Tikhon borrowed heavly from the Sarum Rite which was the rite of Old England.
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
I know what he did. He revised the English Book of Common prayer to be in accordance with Orthodox doctrine. Few rites are created ex nihilo.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
@KabaneTheChristian so how can you say it's exclusively Orthodox? Some guy revised the Book of Common Prayer (which is based on the Sarum Rite) and then called it "Orthodox". That's about it.
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
Because it's not in use in any other Christian communion. It was revised in order to conform to Orthodox doctrine, it is not identical to the Book of Common Prayer.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
@KabaneTheChristian you should read how the Byzantine Emperor forced other Rites to abandon thier ancient liturgical rites in favor of the Byzantine rite.
Case in ponint: The Antiochian Orthodox didn't use the Byzantine liturgy from the beginnning. Theirs was much older, but were forced to implement the Byzantine Emperor's rite.
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
I am aware of the abuses of the Byzantine Emperor, and I do not endorse them.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KabaneTheChristian forgive me for my spelling, this coputer of mine is very slow and freezes in the process. I have trouble posting a comment. But tell me, why does this irk you "Orthodox" so much? do you see traditional Latin Catholics criticizing the way you perform the Mass of Pope St Gregory?
DerrMon 10 months ago
@DerrMon
It irks us because the Uniates have a history of attempting to proselytize and confuse Orthodox into thinking that Eastern Orthodoxy and Uniatism is the same thing.
KabaneTheChristian 10 months ago
they are not orthodox this guys here. there are catholics!!! they should be ashamed of using the way that the orthodox christian celebrate the eucharist. it is a great problem between the orthodox church and the catholic beleive, and the vatican for proselytism reasons and only does not want to solve it!! shame
sotelios 1 year ago
@sotelios it's called de-latinisation....
luvpinas123 11 months ago
Uniontown Pa
padude64 1 year ago
is this church in USA?
alexanyanEVN 2 years ago
Yes, Alex. It is at 14263 Mulberry Dr. Los Gatos, California
katolikogroup 2 years ago
This guy is not Orthodox.
nikolaidis6 2 years ago
Not to split hairs, but I believe the Byzantines say they are Orthodox Christians in union with Rome. I looked on the website and that part caught my eye.
xplund 2 years ago
This location is at Mt Saint Macrina
padude64 3 years ago
Actually it is in California. Los Gatos, near San Jose.
amplidyne 2 years ago
Byzantium
padude64 3 years ago
Why ths liturgy is in English???
Koliberek 3 years ago
This is a Byzantine (formerly Ruthenian or Greek) Catholic liturgy. They have fealty to the pope since the 17th century through a reunity agreement in eastern Czechoslovakia, but they still use the Orthodox liturgies and traditions. It is hoped that they can be a bridge to reestablishing unity with Rome by all Orthodox. This church is part of the Byzantine Catholic Eparchy of Passaic.
groskos 3 years ago
Rich greedy people shall enter hell!
padude64 3 years ago
Who produced this liturgy? Is there an "official" translation of the liturgy into English, or do local churches do their own?
RadicalWhig 3 years ago
The Byzantine rite was always meant to be in the vernacular.
WeenisLad 2 years ago
The distinct traditions of the Roman vs. Byzantine (and other) churches is a historical miracle. During the 129 years of persecution by various Roman emperors, ALL the Christian Churches went underground. They could no longer openly communicate with each other. After the Edict of Milan in 313, the various traditions emerged SACRAMENTAL INTACT, i.e. SACRAMENTALLY IDENTICAL. This means that the Holy Spirit guided them while they no longer had each other.
kalamation 4 years ago
filioque
alexeykh 4 years ago 2
This is not true Orthodoxy!
Phronema 4 years ago
This Greek Catholic Mass is beautiful. May God bless the Eastern Catholics and their holy apostolic traditions and may they convert others back to the true Faith of Christ. Forever live Sacred Tradition and the Traditional Latin Mass!!
darkcoven 4 years ago 2
We Catholics do not, do not, do not believe that the Pope is Christ on Earth. That is a lie and a misrepresentation of what we believe. We do believe he can, in certain limited occasions make infallible statements on matters of faith and morals. Also we believe he has universal jurisdiction over the Church; that is, he has authority to govern and intervene in disputes, problems, etc. as needed. This is not the same as believing the Pope is Christ on Earth--that, of course, would be heretical.
jtjl3 4 years ago
I love my religion
padude64 4 years ago 2
My 2 aunts were nuns here!
padude64 4 years ago
Mount Saint Macrina, St Basil the Great in Uniontown Pa I believe this was the pilgrimage.
padude64 4 years ago
Does the name Subrick ring a bell?
padude64 4 years ago
This church comes from Byzantium
padude64 4 years ago
This place is absolutely beautiful!
padude64 4 years ago
my aunts were nuns at this convent! It is in Uniontown Pa
padude64 4 years ago
If they are Catholic they must be confused Catholics this looks more like a Greek church than a Catholic, the whole thing looks Orthodox.
Nyxtolouloudo 4 years ago
it is because the Greek Church is part of the Eastern Church where the Byzantine Church is also a part of.
katolikogroup 4 years ago
Do you know what Byzantine is and what it means?
Nyxtolouloudo 4 years ago
Again, do you know what Byzantine means? Do you know what Byzantio is?
Nyxtolouloudo 4 years ago
Eastern rite Catholics are very much united with the Church in Rome. It seems Orthodox, because Eastern Catholics have been permitted to keep the Divine Liturgy and their traditions while at the same time united with the whole Catholic Church.
Milliardo5 4 years ago
This is a product of ecumenical stuff. Most Orthodox arent happy with this hybrid that is a contradiction in its self.
DRDNIBOY 4 years ago
The Catholic Byzantine Church is an Eastern Church united to the Church in Rome
katolikogroup 4 years ago
Which really makes no sence because the main reason for the split between the 2 chruches was the idea of the Pope being Christ here on earth. While Orthodox have always said that Christ doesent need a representaive on earth becasue Christ never left. He is always present.
DRDNIBOY 4 years ago
The Eastern Church's reunification with the Western Church does makes sense. More Ecclessial Communities are realizing more and more that the everyone should always be in communion with the Pope, the Bishop of Rome.
katolikogroup 4 years ago
Peter is the one entrusted by Christ to hold the keys of the Kingdom, which is a symbol of the position as Christ's Prime Minister on earth. He is the one who alone can bind and loose on earth. All the bishops and faithful are also only capable of binding and loosing only in unity with him in matters of faith and morals.
Let us pray for the unity of the Eastern and the Western Church.
katolikogroup 4 years ago
Actually, it was not the person of Saint Peter that the church was built on (and keys of Heaven given to), but his faith when he confessed his belief in Christ. Besides, authority is given to those who have the word of God in their hearts, not necessarily those who have been ordained to the highest and most honoured office (i.e. Bishop of Rome). This has been demonstrated repeatedly throughout history, where archbishops took orders from laymen, and monks gave demands and orders to Emperors.
littleringodud 2 years ago
@katolikogroup
There can be NO unity between Eastern and Western Churches so long as the Western Church does not address the issue of its faulty Creed which incorporates the "filioque", does not address the Papacy itself which is non-Canonical, and last but never the least, does not address Rome's attempt to bring Orthodox Christians into Rome's orbit through "Uniatism" and Uniate Churches (which is exactly what happened in the Western Ukraine).
mihankhah 1 year ago
you are so wrong! read about the early church and how it was formed. The Orthodox Church alone is the true, incorruptible, Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
abookire 4 years ago
you are right
irimiar 4 years ago
He's commemorating Benidict Pope of Rome? But this looks like an Orthodox Church.. how deceiving.
VivaPink 4 years ago
Hi Vivapink! The Byzantine Church broke with the Western Church before and was part of the Eastern Orthodox Church. But eventually, they united to the Bishop of Rome who is the Pope thus fully uniting themselves to the Catholic Church
katolikogroup 4 years ago 2
@katolikogroup
Actually, the Eastern Orthodox Church and Roman Catholic Churches are still in schism and will be for probably a long time.
This is a Byzantine Catholic Church, which is a Roman Catholic Church that practice the Byzantine Rite. They are in no way associated with the Eastern Orthodox Church.
OrthoArchitectDU 1 year ago
Comment removed
DerrMon 10 months ago
@VivaPink
This is a Uniate Church (Eastern-rite Catholic Church).
mihankhah 1 year ago
its nice to know that there are other filipinos interested in the Byzantine rite divine liturgy. Feel free to join my parish in Anaheim, California. Annunciation Byzantine Catholic Church welcomes all visitors ;D
antoninaC 4 years ago