@schmidtkid No, the initial sound and shake was caused by vibrations as the aircraft struck the tower. The actual sound of it impacting, which you hear moments later, is delayed because sound travels at around 340 meters per second. This obviously dictates that the further away you are from an acoustic source, the longer it takes for it to reach you.
@schmidtkid nope. thats the exact moment the plane hit the tower. its about 2 seconds befor you hear it. thats 650 meter in soundspeed, about the distance they where away from it.
@ayrtonton100 I believe if you were in the plane that a gigantic fire storm came right in front of your eyes. It didn't took seconds to die, but milliseconds..
Comments about something as tragic as this should be used in memorial of the victims, not who crashed the planes, when, why and how. The loss of life suffered that day and since in the hearts of the victim's families should be resounding on videos such as this. Wherever they are now, I wish them everlasting peace.
@dot405 "When people watch this video, you should only be mourning the loss of the victims on 9/11, not asking questions. It doesn't matter who caused the most tragic event in our nations history, why such an event happened, or how it was carried out. We should only cry for the lives that were lost, not fight for them."
@dot405 Actually I believe that wayy of coping with grief is to question how such a thing could have happened, and way. That is a perfectly natural reaction. So to say what someone should or shouldn't do really doesn't make sense.
still find it interesting how there are 2 sounds. u can just hear the first sound in '9/11 First Plane' just as the plane hits. interesting considering how far they are away in the other video and the sound should take a couple seconds to get there.
Everyday that passes, the general population forgets the details more and more and the popular media continue to distort the facts - particularly playing the emotional / patriotic theme. What do we have left? A vague idea and repeated misinformation with a twist of brainwashing. And a barely investigated story. Why couldn't the 21st Century have begun with optimism, intelligence and trust in Humanity?
Can you imagine what that must've sounded like at that actual moment? How dastardly an attack--that accomplished nothing but the murder of innocent people. God Bless the First-Responders and Innocence murdered that horrible day.
@TheThermite obviously u need 2 update yo shit...lol come eat some nice mcdonalds apply for a job, get your malaria shot, and enjoy life man...lol jesus loves u and so do i :)
@Inigo37 And thats that is it? Spot on well done, because the thousands of eye witnesses who saw the planes go into the towers don't count for anything, they obviously all made it up and its all make believe. The towers never fell, they just... magically disappeared with no trace of the thousands of people who went missing. If it was a controlled demolition, they'd have to plant the explosives within the main structure, that means knocking the walls down and re sealing them.
@MrObvious15 I can´t understand what do you want to tell me. I AM TOTALLY that 9/11 was a DEMOLITION, NO DOUBT. Do you want to see and listen one EXPLOSION? well: Youtube: New view of the WTC2 collapse. In this short video (11secs), at the 3-4s an innoportune comentarist begin to speak (how convenient) forget his voice and listen the sound of the collapse, in the 4-5s is CLEARLY listen a BIG EXPLOSION sound and a debris is push to down at much more speed than the upper debris (in the front wall)
@Inigo37 I have listened to the video, the sound could be anything though, the debris hitting the ground maybe? Like i said, if it was a controlled demolition, the people 'in on it' would have to get through the walls in order to plant the explosives in the foundations of the world trade center, they'd also need access to every floor in the WTC to plant the explosives in on each floor, this would then have to go on without the 50 000 or so workers noticing a single thing to prevent suspicion.
@MrObvious15 if you investigate on the net, the towers was power down several times a few days before 9/11, and TOTALLY evacuations aswell. Do you want a CLEARLY BIG EXPLOSION during the collapse? Youtube: New view of the WTC2 collapse. This short video (11s), at the 3-4s an inoportune comentarist begin to speak, forget his voice, and listen the sound of the collapse, at 4-5s you will hear a CLEAR EXPLOSION an a debris push to down at much more speed than the upper debris in the front wall
@Inigo37 I know I've watched a video with a guy talking about that, it doesn't explain how they managed to precisely pin point where the plane was going to hit the building, because in all of the videos, both towers collapse at the point of impact from the planes, it also doesn't explain how they managed to rebuild the walls on each floor in a matter of days so that no one suspected a thing with all the explosives put in place considering how big the twin towers were.
@jerichomutant Dude seriously? I was at 9 W 57th street that day on the 50th floor. The plane went right over my building and I had a clear view on the south side of the building straight to the WTC.. I saw the plane fly toward it for about 10 seconds before it hit... it was a plane...
@Maximus2Dali I know that the planes was real because I have seen A LOT of videos, and compare the most tiny details, and another video of a guy interviewed at the same time that the second plane hit the tower, this guy seconds before of plane apearance comment the explosion on the lobby, and then you can see how he is search with his eyes the plane. In another video, the sound is CLEARLY NOT the sound of a plane crash into a building, is a BIG EXPLOSION.
@Maximus2Dali Did ask to you how doesn´t exist a video of the second plane that clearly ste what kind of plane was? How they can hide the several videos that I am totally sure exist of the second plane with enogth quality to see the plane? The Pentagon have 87 security cameras, why we have never seen of the "plane" hitting the pentagon? There is several videos of the moment of the second plane impact that NONE of the cameras has zoom on it, in other videos the camera simply point in another way.
Well, they do think I'm a Nazi or wanted to be one. Hitler had said hi to me in a 1930's doc./news reel and knew that he would be dead by that time. My whole life I thought I was Polish & ate Polish, Polish Church & School. There was one great-gr. from Germany & they followed from Germany during 1940's & then tv was big in Bflo area they say & many from Nazi Germany.... so now I can just shut off my tv news is their 2011 FCC-Not wanted goals. Odd huh? Gossip says many wnt on tv to be * .
See, if it was a controlled demolition, you would have heard loud bombs and people would have reacted instantly to the sound. But it took these guys a few seconds to realize what was going on.
Wow ... at the 0:21 point it appears the aircraft passed through the remote ENG microwave path link ... notice the momentary picture break-up as the plane is coming in?
This seems to contradict the assertion in the video description that the camera was *only* recording locally to built-in tape storage ...
My question to WNYW engineering personnel: were you using a satellite link that day or a terrestrial microwave link from the ENG van back to the studio for the scheduled live shot?
Notice the time delay between the glitch and the boom. Like lightning and thunder. Time the exact time between the glitch and the boom, and you have the distance from the cameraman to the plane crash on 1WTC.
Analysis of the audio from what I can make out, the time delay is exactly
1. Wasn't interference, audio would crack & break. Camera angle wobbles
2. No one hit the camera, look at the shadow
3. Wasn't from the impact, it happens before it
4. No sonic boom, plane wasn't going 761mph
5. Distance wasn't larger enough for delayed sound
6. William Rodriguez & others felt an explosion in the basement of WTC "6 or 7 seconds before the impact above". This could be the shockwave from that.
@SPARKID Spoken like a true believer of the 9/11 cover-up. Your confronted with the harsh facts of what really happened, so you resort to verbal abuse.
But if you don't want to take my word for that there were explosions in the WTC before and after the plane hit, how about employees, workers and emergency personnel who were there.
@FamousNoName Spoken like a true believer of the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory. You believe millions of people (including the witnesses who lived in New York and saw this) were paid off in order to keep this hidden, and no one bothered coming forward about it. I really don't understand how you can't figure out how stupid your logic is.
@johnnyf19 How is it a Theory when countless people heard & saw explosions going off in the towers. These people are not paid off, they are fully ignored by both the US Gov and the media. They just take notice of the aspects which back up their lie
Here's some stupid logic for you. Two 110 story skyscrapers, designed the take plane hits, collaspe fully to dust, at the speed of G, into its own structure because of fire which burnt for less than 2 hours
@FamousNoName Designed for plane hits...Not for the fires afterwards. The fireproofing was blown off too by the planes.
Explosions does not always mean bombs. (Cars exploded, debris fell, floors fell on top of eachother and those sound similar to an explosion)
It was not freefall speed. The towers would have fallen for 9 seconds if it was freefall speed. But they took longer. WTC2 took 12 seconds to fall. WTC1 took 22 seconds to fall.
WTC7 fell from fires caused by 100 tonne debris hitting it.
@MazJax So Frank DeMartini & John Skilling are lying then? Where's the evidence that the fireproofing was blown off?
So cars exploded, debris fell & floors pancaked inside the towers while firefighters & civis were inside? How is that remotely possible? /watch?v=An5aa3k3iDE
NISTs top guy (indian bloke) said the WTC fell in 9secs & 2 in 11secs. But I probably shouldn't quote bullshiting liars
WTC7 had perfect symmetry & fell in 7sec /watch?v=lESol88wOi0 /watch?v=k3DRhwRN06I
The pictures, and logic. The fireproofing sometimes fell off on its own. People had to constantly replace it. A jet plane could easily blow it all off.
"How is that possible"
You think the firefighters were actually able to battle the infernos in the towers? HA.
"shouldn't quote bullshit liars like NIST"
Yeah, I'm sure you know much better than NIST.
"Fell in perfect symmetry"
Yeah, that's why it leaned to the south as it was falling.
@MazJax Where's the pictures of it falling off, who's logic, NIST? People didnt constantly replace it, the proofing was asbestos. To remove & replace it would have cost Silverstein hundreds of millions of $
Fire Chief Oreo Palmer made it to the 78th floor to radio "2 isolated pockets of fire, we need 2 lines". He had a plan to deal with it there was no inferno. Civis also made it past the impact point
David Ray Griffin's book exposes NISTs lies
Fire has never or since collapsed a steel highrise
No, it's just common sense. The fireproofing was foam asbestos. If foam sprayed on a steel beam can survive a jet impact at 500 mph, I'd be pretty surprised! You don't HAVE to believe NIST, try it for yourself! Crash a 767 into a foam-covered beam at 500 mph. Note results.
The 78th floor? You mean the floor where the wing barely clipped? Where there were small fires? Tell me, what did the floors just above him, where the plane dealt greater damage, look like?
@FamousNoName Cross out asbestos, my mistake, asbestos was only in the low floors of the north tower. The upper floors and the south tower had no asbestos in them.
Name one steel, tube-design building, that was hit by a jet/debris, and then let to freely burn without any firefighting done or fireproofing, that didn't collapse.
@MazJax How much foam was blown off? Just the impact site, aboveit or everywhere? What blew all of it off & how did it reach the undamaged gaps where the steel was?
F175 hit between floor 77 & 85. Yes there was small fires because of several observations.
1. People where stood in the impact point (Edna Cintron) waving for help. How could they stand amidst an inferno?
@FamousNoName 4,5,6 was directly collapsed on by 1 and 2 as well, so explain that popular mechanics. They cant explain it anyway bc we have the NYFD saying get back THEIR about to bring this building down on VIDEO PEOPLE WAKE UP!
@KingDavid478 WTC 4 5 & 6 were ignited when debris from the planes hit 1 & 2. They burned throughout without any resistance from NYFD cuz they were dealing with 1 & 2
They were all partially crushed by the falling towers & continued to burn for hours. But yet they stood gutted & black for weeks after
There was no molten metal, no pancaking floors, no collapse
If there were no large fires, why did 300 people jump do their deaths? Why did Kevin Cosgrove and many others report hot arid smoke and fires? Why did so many people report charred corpses?
The person in the hole can be seen shortly after the plane hit. The fires grew later...
40% of the fuel remained in the building and later burnt off, but the massive amounts of office equipment kept the fires burning. The fires WEAKENED the steel. They didn't have to melt them.
@MazJax People jumped because of the smoke, it made the air unbreathable. Ever been near a bonfire, it burns & chokes your lungs & eyes
Black smoke indicates a cool burning fire & shows it is starved of oxygen. Who reported these charred bodies? You make many claims but you don't back them up with evidence
If the fires grew later, how? Did it take a break before starting? If the fires where so hot as described, the hole would have shown a roaring, glowing interior & core of the tower.
@MazJax FEMA's Report "most fuel was gone on impact & the rest burnt off 5-20min after
Office equipment did keep the fires going but a low temps. Wood, plastics, fabrics in an open air fire will burn at 287.5 C (549.5 F)
Nice sidestep there, PM did the same. Well then how do you explain the molten metal pouring out of WTC2 minutes before the collapse & weeks after in the rubble? Dont say its aluminium thats silver when melted
Can you prove the fires were at a low temperature? No? Thought so.
Molten aluminum glows bright orange at 1800 degrees F, the temperature of the WTC fires. It is only silvery at 600 degrees F, a much cooler temperature.
Molten iron creates bright white sparks when poured, and no concealable amount of thermite could have possibly melted the steel. It takes a flowerpot full of thermite to create a tiny hole in steel. There is no way thermite could have cut the thick steel beams.
@MazJax Do you pay any attention to the science facts & links I put forward? YES or NO? Il say it again
Black smoke means a cool burning fire & office materials don't burn hot enough to make steel buildings collapse, even with the added jet fuel. Look at that link
So how exactly did the fires get to 1800F which you say?
If it wasnt thermite, what created the iron spheres, high levels of sulphur & barium & red-grey chips in the WTC dust? /watch?v=jpPNRrylH00 /watch?v=GrxykBEyLAs
There was no barium nitrate (key ingredient of thermate) found in the wtc dust.
Those chips could have come from anything. There was sulpher in the drywall. There is no way enough thermite could have been hidden to cut just ONE beam let along bring a tower down.
Iron spheres are created by blowtorches, like the ones used by clean-up
@MazJax Also, WTC 4 5 and 6 were much shorter than wtc7 and had more vertical supports to evenly distribute the weight. WTC7 didn't, and it was badly damaged, leading to uneven balancing and a collapse.
You need weight to cause a building collapse as well...
Im done trying to reason with you because you clearly ignore all science & just make crap up to keep your fairytale from falling apart. I feel sorry for you
Are you going to deny the truthers that also know jet fuel can burn at 1800 degrees F? They're the ones that keep saying the melting point of steel is way above the 1800 degrees F fires!
@FamousNoName The initial crash blocked out the signal WNYW was broadcasting from (the north tower). The camera was stationed away from the towers, and the sound of the aircraft hitting the building took, by my calculations, 1.7 seconds from when the blackout occurs, thus telling us that the videographer is about 350 - 400 feet away from 1WTC. Your argument is retarded, much like you.
@cod7strats Yeh, that seems possible, but I think you didn't take notice of my first point. When video communication is interrupted, there is nearly alwys a break in the audio. It should crack and become distorted. Skype, satellite TV or video feeds are prime examples. Lost of signal doesn't explain the focus shift or thud either.
Look at a few of the links I gave to the other guy.
And just to remind us all, 9/11 wasn't JUST the twin towers. It was the pentagon, and the plane crash in pensilvainia. And this isn't even that hard part. Hearing people on there cell phones calling there husbands, wifes, brothers, sisters. Family. Saying- I am going to die, tell the kids i love them! THATS hard :'( fuck you osama bin loden. i hate you. and so does everyone else! I want to just shoot you in the fucking head again.
@metallicaandkornrock - funny how the anchor said, did a plane hit the world trade center?, how the fuck he could make that asseveration?"
Its obvious how he knew. The entire worlds media was sent a memo before 9/11 explaining how it would go down. All 12,806 of them LOL. Lets see, loud roar of jet followed by exploision, no more engine roar and then smoke billowing high up from the direction of WTC building (most New Yorkers know the skyline of their own city). It is not always conspiracy.
one gets an idea of how big an explosion this must have been, because on every video I've seen of any of these WTC crashes there is an EM pulse that wipes out a few frames on the film... fukn sad
You can see the shock wave traveled through the ground much quicker than the air...everytime I see this, I know that sickingly dull thud was the sound of innocent lives being snuffed out. 10 years later and it still makes me honestly sick. God rest their souls.
I've always felt the United States' response to the devastating events of September 11th should have been peaceful and reflective of our humanity. I created a video and posted it on my channel to honor those who lost their lives that morning and in the wars that followed. Peace is possible, but it has to start somewhere.
@megamogx - wow - copying and pasting videos to watch. What a convincing argument. I don't even need to watch any of your videos to know you're a 9/11 truther.
@ GunsmythFrog... The people who are resposible were NOT muslim. they are terrorists. Muslims are peaceful people. terrorists are the extremists that caused it. its the ignorant fucks like you who blame the muslim religion.
@soxbbgirl87 Islam is a shit stain on humanity - as any religion is. At least nations that are predominately christian actually contribute to humanity. Name anything good to come out of muslim theocracy
The initial impact with the building (which distorted the camera recording momentarily) is followed by the explosion of the airplane fuel within the building. This is clearly shown on the video of the impact itself. 1. the impact, 2. the fiery explosion of fuel. The siren is likely from a patrol car that may be nearby and happened to see the plane + impact and that is why it was so quick after the incident.
...and also, the siren that kicks in immediately after impact is not heard on the Naudet footage at all. Sure, they filmed in different locales, obviously, but there's nothing but silence in their location after the North Tower is hit-- seems like this siren here should have been on the other clip as well?
CIA 9/11 script: Remote controlled planes, WTC 1 and 2 and 7 controlled demolition shortly after the distraction of the planes, for more confusion a missile into the pentagon, flight 93 just in the script, hijackers and osama bin laden all in the script, Bush would announce invasion plans, Harry S would get some money for silencing, free card for endless war on terrorism.
this is why people should disable comments for ALL 9/11 related videos out of the respect of the event. EVERYONE SHUT THE FUCK UP. go take this dumbass shit to another video.
notice how those union thug tv techs didn't rush to pick up the camera and shoot the video of the building. I guess when you're in a union, you don't have to work hard to get the job done.
@Adamillionaire123 Yeah. A Muslim saying that about Islam has just as much evidence of that than you do. In fact, they have more. At least Mohammad is a figure of history. Nobody knows whether or not Jesus is or is not, in fact, a made up messiah.
@MrFishman113 | yeah! cos then bush and cheney and gates and every american federal agency wouldn't have been able to blame it on them if they hadn't existed!!! damn muslims!!! how dare they let themselves exist so that bush and cheney and gates could use them to cover up murdering thousands of people!!!! damn muslims!!!
/watch?v=gJy7lhVK2xE
/user/DavidChandler911?blend=7&ob=5#p/c/3705E482383CCA91
FamousNoName 4 days ago
The exsplosian haunts me
alexrules181 1 week ago
@Abricialio oh god i know it!
ayrtonton100 1 week ago
Look at that reporter, he looks shaken to the bone.
13evilmuffin 2 weeks ago
When the camera jumps at 00:21 I bet that's from the explosions described in the basement of the WTC, prior to the plane hitting.
schmidtkid 2 weeks ago
@schmidtkid No, the initial sound and shake was caused by vibrations as the aircraft struck the tower. The actual sound of it impacting, which you hear moments later, is delayed because sound travels at around 340 meters per second. This obviously dictates that the further away you are from an acoustic source, the longer it takes for it to reach you.
Atropys 2 weeks ago
@schmidtkid nope. thats the exact moment the plane hit the tower. its about 2 seconds befor you hear it. thats 650 meter in soundspeed, about the distance they where away from it.
k1dicarus 18 hours ago
i try to imagine how was the people inside the plane and this is unimagineable
ayrtonton100 1 month ago 17
@ayrtonton100 I believe if you were in the plane that a gigantic fire storm came right in front of your eyes. It didn't took seconds to die, but milliseconds..
Abricialio 1 week ago in playlist My Top Favorites
holy fuck man this is just unbelieveable
ayrtonton100 1 month ago 8
Comments about something as tragic as this should be used in memorial of the victims, not who crashed the planes, when, why and how. The loss of life suffered that day and since in the hearts of the victim's families should be resounding on videos such as this. Wherever they are now, I wish them everlasting peace.
dot405 1 month ago
@dot405 "When people watch this video, you should only be mourning the loss of the victims on 9/11, not asking questions. It doesn't matter who caused the most tragic event in our nations history, why such an event happened, or how it was carried out. We should only cry for the lives that were lost, not fight for them."
Fuck you Dot, fuck you soooooo much.
mattlock256 1 month ago
@dot405 Actually I believe that wayy of coping with grief is to question how such a thing could have happened, and way. That is a perfectly natural reaction. So to say what someone should or shouldn't do really doesn't make sense.
IsTianita 1 month ago
illuminati
2gamb1 1 month ago
still find it interesting how there are 2 sounds. u can just hear the first sound in '9/11 First Plane' just as the plane hits. interesting considering how far they are away in the other video and the sound should take a couple seconds to get there.
disturbedsistem 2 months ago
@disturbedsistem one was closer than the other
MrToxicheyna7 1 month ago
Everyday that passes, the general population forgets the details more and more and the popular media continue to distort the facts - particularly playing the emotional / patriotic theme. What do we have left? A vague idea and repeated misinformation with a twist of brainwashing. And a barely investigated story. Why couldn't the 21st Century have begun with optimism, intelligence and trust in Humanity?
stillwater027 2 months ago
Can you imagine what that must've sounded like at that actual moment? How dastardly an attack--that accomplished nothing but the murder of innocent people. God Bless the First-Responders and Innocence murdered that horrible day.
zg294 2 months ago
@TheThermite obviously u need 2 update yo shit...lol come eat some nice mcdonalds apply for a job, get your malaria shot, and enjoy life man...lol jesus loves u and so do i :)
MrINZANE12 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This video is fucking fake dude...
The sound of the plane is fake, the cameras distorsion when the plane hit is also fake.
Babyableful 2 months ago
The oficial story of 9/11 is the PERFECT TOOL to see the intelligent people and the MOST STUPID PEOPLE which is near of all of the world population.
Well, for the few intelligent people: yes, 9/11 was a fraud.
Inigo37 2 months ago
@Inigo37 And thats that is it? Spot on well done, because the thousands of eye witnesses who saw the planes go into the towers don't count for anything, they obviously all made it up and its all make believe. The towers never fell, they just... magically disappeared with no trace of the thousands of people who went missing. If it was a controlled demolition, they'd have to plant the explosives within the main structure, that means knocking the walls down and re sealing them.
MrObvious15 2 months ago
@MrObvious15 I can´t understand what do you want to tell me. I AM TOTALLY that 9/11 was a DEMOLITION, NO DOUBT. Do you want to see and listen one EXPLOSION? well: Youtube: New view of the WTC2 collapse. In this short video (11secs), at the 3-4s an innoportune comentarist begin to speak (how convenient) forget his voice and listen the sound of the collapse, in the 4-5s is CLEARLY listen a BIG EXPLOSION sound and a debris is push to down at much more speed than the upper debris (in the front wall)
Inigo37 2 months ago
@Inigo37 I have listened to the video, the sound could be anything though, the debris hitting the ground maybe? Like i said, if it was a controlled demolition, the people 'in on it' would have to get through the walls in order to plant the explosives in the foundations of the world trade center, they'd also need access to every floor in the WTC to plant the explosives in on each floor, this would then have to go on without the 50 000 or so workers noticing a single thing to prevent suspicion.
MrObvious15 2 months ago
@MrObvious15 if you investigate on the net, the towers was power down several times a few days before 9/11, and TOTALLY evacuations aswell. Do you want a CLEARLY BIG EXPLOSION during the collapse? Youtube: New view of the WTC2 collapse. This short video (11s), at the 3-4s an inoportune comentarist begin to speak, forget his voice, and listen the sound of the collapse, at 4-5s you will hear a CLEAR EXPLOSION an a debris push to down at much more speed than the upper debris in the front wall
Inigo37 2 months ago
@Inigo37 I know I've watched a video with a guy talking about that, it doesn't explain how they managed to precisely pin point where the plane was going to hit the building, because in all of the videos, both towers collapse at the point of impact from the planes, it also doesn't explain how they managed to rebuild the walls on each floor in a matter of days so that no one suspected a thing with all the explosives put in place considering how big the twin towers were.
MrObvious15 2 months ago
that explosion!! wow that shudders me to this day
chickenhuntinattheca 2 months ago in playlist 9/11/01
its really depressing how people were laughing and chatting seconds away from the event that would change the world forever
Chiino44 2 months ago
There were no planes. It was a missile......they digitally cgi'd the planes. This sounds crazy, but OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD was in full play.
missile hit wtc.........../watch?v=is5klaVGLn8
jerichomutant 3 months ago
@jerichomutant
Go away you stupid cunt.
southeparkfreak 3 months ago
@jerichomutant Dude seriously? I was at 9 W 57th street that day on the 50th floor. The plane went right over my building and I had a clear view on the south side of the building straight to the WTC.. I saw the plane fly toward it for about 10 seconds before it hit... it was a plane...
Maximus2Dali 2 months ago
@Maximus2Dali did you see what airline it was?
FinWolf100 2 months ago
@FinWolf100 No I didn't.. I only saw the rear of the plane... wings, engines, rudder, some of the fuselage..
Maximus2Dali 2 months ago
@Maximus2Dali Totally agree with you, but, WAHT KIND OF PLANE? military plane SURE.
Inigo37 2 months ago
@Inigo37 Agreed - I can't say for sure if it was or wasn't a military plane...
Maximus2Dali 2 months ago
@Maximus2Dali I know that the planes was real because I have seen A LOT of videos, and compare the most tiny details, and another video of a guy interviewed at the same time that the second plane hit the tower, this guy seconds before of plane apearance comment the explosion on the lobby, and then you can see how he is search with his eyes the plane. In another video, the sound is CLEARLY NOT the sound of a plane crash into a building, is a BIG EXPLOSION.
Inigo37 2 months ago
@Maximus2Dali Did ask to you how doesn´t exist a video of the second plane that clearly ste what kind of plane was? How they can hide the several videos that I am totally sure exist of the second plane with enogth quality to see the plane? The Pentagon have 87 security cameras, why we have never seen of the "plane" hitting the pentagon? There is several videos of the moment of the second plane impact that NONE of the cameras has zoom on it, in other videos the camera simply point in another way.
Inigo37 2 months ago
I miss Jim Ryan and the old crew.
Maximus2Dali 3 months ago
Well, they do think I'm a Nazi or wanted to be one. Hitler had said hi to me in a 1930's doc./news reel and knew that he would be dead by that time. My whole life I thought I was Polish & ate Polish, Polish Church & School. There was one great-gr. from Germany & they followed from Germany during 1940's & then tv was big in Bflo area they say & many from Nazi Germany.... so now I can just shut off my tv news is their 2011 FCC-Not wanted goals. Odd huh? Gossip says many wnt on tv to be * .
JoseCleveland 3 months ago
See, if it was a controlled demolition, you would have heard loud bombs and people would have reacted instantly to the sound. But it took these guys a few seconds to realize what was going on.
MazJax 3 months ago
This video is fucking fake dude...
The sound of the plane is fake, the cameras distorsion when it hit also fake.
Babyableful 3 months ago
I never saw this video, it is absolutely rare and in a disturbing way special.
Because this is the first time I saw a video that shows 'normal' moments before the attack.
Just plan normal every day life.
It's disturbing to see one woman look up in the other direction, and then walking further.
The world was way less corupt and evil then it is right now , this verry second.
She probably didnt make a big deal of it.
But if something like that would happen RIGHT NOW, YOU WOULD JUMP UP!!!
miriamuSama 3 months ago
I just watch the first half of this video, and just listen to the sound of the plane and that explosion. It gives me chills every time.
arugila27 3 months ago
Wow ... at the 0:21 point it appears the aircraft passed through the remote ENG microwave path link ... notice the momentary picture break-up as the plane is coming in?
This seems to contradict the assertion in the video description that the camera was *only* recording locally to built-in tape storage ...
My question to WNYW engineering personnel: were you using a satellite link that day or a terrestrial microwave link from the ENG van back to the studio for the scheduled live shot?
.
uploadJ 4 months ago
the title needs to be changed to the" first bomb that went off before the first plane hit"
19may0001 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Notice the time delay between the glitch and the boom. Like lightning and thunder. Time the exact time between the glitch and the boom, and you have the distance from the cameraman to the plane crash on 1WTC.
Analysis of the audio from what I can make out, the time delay is exactly
1.413 seconds
multiplied by
343m/s
DISTANCE: 484.6 metres
CanberraUser 4 months ago
Comment removed
CanberraUser 4 months ago
This really is Rare
First time ive seen it
AccessDenied55 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Damn thats crazy
Lennart5991 4 months ago
People wondering what that thud was, well;
1. Wasn't interference, audio would crack & break. Camera angle wobbles
2. No one hit the camera, look at the shadow
3. Wasn't from the impact, it happens before it
4. No sonic boom, plane wasn't going 761mph
5. Distance wasn't larger enough for delayed sound
6. William Rodriguez & others felt an explosion in the basement of WTC "6 or 7 seconds before the impact above". This could be the shockwave from that.
(AE911TRUTH)
FamousNoName 4 months ago
@FamousNoName Shut the fuck up douchebag. You don't know shit.
SPARKID 4 months ago
@SPARKID Spoken like a true believer of the 9/11 cover-up. Your confronted with the harsh facts of what really happened, so you resort to verbal abuse.
But if you don't want to take my word for that there were explosions in the WTC before and after the plane hit, how about employees, workers and emergency personnel who were there.
/watch?v=wIZtqKiidlo
/watch?v=X3uFvOiTNz4
/watch?v=UhGcBxONSvc
/watch?v=URpC6C3FRbk
/watch?v=g2qzoUgsQyI
/watch?v=An5aa3k3iDE
FamousNoName 4 months ago
@FamousNoName Spoken like a true believer of the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory. You believe millions of people (including the witnesses who lived in New York and saw this) were paid off in order to keep this hidden, and no one bothered coming forward about it. I really don't understand how you can't figure out how stupid your logic is.
johnnyf19 4 months ago
@johnnyf19 How is it a Theory when countless people heard & saw explosions going off in the towers. These people are not paid off, they are fully ignored by both the US Gov and the media. They just take notice of the aspects which back up their lie
Here's some stupid logic for you. Two 110 story skyscrapers, designed the take plane hits, collaspe fully to dust, at the speed of G, into its own structure because of fire which burnt for less than 2 hours
Then their WTC7.
FamousNoName 4 months ago
@FamousNoName Designed for plane hits...Not for the fires afterwards. The fireproofing was blown off too by the planes.
Explosions does not always mean bombs. (Cars exploded, debris fell, floors fell on top of eachother and those sound similar to an explosion)
It was not freefall speed. The towers would have fallen for 9 seconds if it was freefall speed. But they took longer. WTC2 took 12 seconds to fall. WTC1 took 22 seconds to fall.
WTC7 fell from fires caused by 100 tonne debris hitting it.
MazJax 3 months ago
@MazJax So Frank DeMartini & John Skilling are lying then? Where's the evidence that the fireproofing was blown off?
So cars exploded, debris fell & floors pancaked inside the towers while firefighters & civis were inside? How is that remotely possible? /watch?v=An5aa3k3iDE
NISTs top guy (indian bloke) said the WTC fell in 9secs & 2 in 11secs. But I probably shouldn't quote bullshiting liars
WTC7 had perfect symmetry & fell in 7sec /watch?v=lESol88wOi0 /watch?v=k3DRhwRN06I
Get off the blue pill
FamousNoName 3 months ago
@FamousNoName "evidence fireproofing was blown off"
The pictures, and logic. The fireproofing sometimes fell off on its own. People had to constantly replace it. A jet plane could easily blow it all off.
"How is that possible"
You think the firefighters were actually able to battle the infernos in the towers? HA.
"shouldn't quote bullshit liars like NIST"
Yeah, I'm sure you know much better than NIST.
"Fell in perfect symmetry"
Yeah, that's why it leaned to the south as it was falling.
MazJax 3 months ago
@MazJax Where's the pictures of it falling off, who's logic, NIST? People didnt constantly replace it, the proofing was asbestos. To remove & replace it would have cost Silverstein hundreds of millions of $
Fire Chief Oreo Palmer made it to the 78th floor to radio "2 isolated pockets of fire, we need 2 lines". He had a plan to deal with it there was no inferno. Civis also made it past the impact point
David Ray Griffin's book exposes NISTs lies
Fire has never or since collapsed a steel highrise
FamousNoName 3 months ago
@FamousNoName
"Who's logic, NIST?"
No, it's just common sense. The fireproofing was foam asbestos. If foam sprayed on a steel beam can survive a jet impact at 500 mph, I'd be pretty surprised! You don't HAVE to believe NIST, try it for yourself! Crash a 767 into a foam-covered beam at 500 mph. Note results.
The 78th floor? You mean the floor where the wing barely clipped? Where there were small fires? Tell me, what did the floors just above him, where the plane dealt greater damage, look like?
MazJax 3 months ago
@FamousNoName Cross out asbestos, my mistake, asbestos was only in the low floors of the north tower. The upper floors and the south tower had no asbestos in them.
Fireproofing blown off: Watch at 1:16
/watch?v=fKcPA4heOOQ
Name one steel, tube-design building, that was hit by a jet/debris, and then let to freely burn without any firefighting done or fireproofing, that didn't collapse.
You can't.
MazJax 3 months ago
@MazJax How much foam was blown off? Just the impact site, aboveit or everywhere? What blew all of it off & how did it reach the undamaged gaps where the steel was?
F175 hit between floor 77 & 85. Yes there was small fires because of several observations.
1. People where stood in the impact point (Edna Cintron) waving for help. How could they stand amidst an inferno?
2. No flames were bursting out of the windows
3. Smoke was black meaning a cool burning fire
WTC 4 5 & 6 burnt but no collapse
FamousNoName 3 months ago
@FamousNoName 4,5,6 was directly collapsed on by 1 and 2 as well, so explain that popular mechanics. They cant explain it anyway bc we have the NYFD saying get back THEIR about to bring this building down on VIDEO PEOPLE WAKE UP!
KingDavid478 3 months ago
@KingDavid478 WTC 4 5 & 6 were ignited when debris from the planes hit 1 & 2. They burned throughout without any resistance from NYFD cuz they were dealing with 1 & 2
They were all partially crushed by the falling towers & continued to burn for hours. But yet they stood gutted & black for weeks after
There was no molten metal, no pancaking floors, no collapse
911research .wtc7 .net /wtc /evidence /photos /wtc3456 .html
/wtc /attack /buildings .html
PM is propaganda bullshit
FamousNoName 3 months ago
@FamousNoName Yea I know man. Popular Mechanics SUCKS BALLS! THUMBS UP IF U AGREE!!!
KingDavid478 3 months ago
@FamousNoName
The foam from the impact site blew off, the steel was exposed, and snapped away at that area, enough to cause a collapse.
The only person who reported small fires was Orio Palmer because the floor he was on was barely hit, the floor above him was an inferno.
The hole was the coolest area with the most air. people can still survive standing feet from fires that hot...
Flames WERE bursting from windows.
Plastics and jet fuel burn black as well.
WTC456 were designed much differently.
MazJax 3 months ago
@MazJax How can you prove those theories? Shockwaves dnt curve they bounce losing energy
How could people get to the hole if the fires were so hot. Cold air sinks so all hot air would have gone out of the hole
Where were flames bursting out of windows, any pictures? There was only cold smoke
Furniture burns at 600-700C & the fuel was gone on impact (notice the fireball) & the rest burnt off shortly after, not hot enough for molten metal
456 were steel, like 127
/watch?v=trfCyvLAQd8
FamousNoName 3 months ago
@FamousNoName
If there were no large fires, why did 300 people jump do their deaths? Why did Kevin Cosgrove and many others report hot arid smoke and fires? Why did so many people report charred corpses?
The person in the hole can be seen shortly after the plane hit. The fires grew later...
40% of the fuel remained in the building and later burnt off, but the massive amounts of office equipment kept the fires burning. The fires WEAKENED the steel. They didn't have to melt them.
MazJax 3 months ago
@MazJax People jumped because of the smoke, it made the air unbreathable. Ever been near a bonfire, it burns & chokes your lungs & eyes
Black smoke indicates a cool burning fire & shows it is starved of oxygen. Who reported these charred bodies? You make many claims but you don't back them up with evidence
If the fires grew later, how? Did it take a break before starting? If the fires where so hot as described, the hole would have shown a roaring, glowing interior & core of the tower.
Continued.
FamousNoName 3 months ago
@MazJax FEMA's Report "most fuel was gone on impact & the rest burnt off 5-20min after
Office equipment did keep the fires going but a low temps. Wood, plastics, fabrics in an open air fire will burn at 287.5 C (549.5 F)
Nice sidestep there, PM did the same. Well then how do you explain the molten metal pouring out of WTC2 minutes before the collapse & weeks after in the rubble? Dont say its aluminium thats silver when melted
911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/fires/steel.html
watch?v=5nvWh2aTdCs
FamousNoName 3 months ago
@FamousNoName
Can you prove the fires were at a low temperature? No? Thought so.
Molten aluminum glows bright orange at 1800 degrees F, the temperature of the WTC fires. It is only silvery at 600 degrees F, a much cooler temperature.
Molten iron creates bright white sparks when poured, and no concealable amount of thermite could have possibly melted the steel. It takes a flowerpot full of thermite to create a tiny hole in steel. There is no way thermite could have cut the thick steel beams.
MazJax 3 months ago
@MazJax Do you pay any attention to the science facts & links I put forward? YES or NO? Il say it again
Black smoke means a cool burning fire & office materials don't burn hot enough to make steel buildings collapse, even with the added jet fuel. Look at that link
So how exactly did the fires get to 1800F which you say?
If it wasnt thermite, what created the iron spheres, high levels of sulphur & barium & red-grey chips in the WTC dust? /watch?v=jpPNRrylH00 /watch?v=GrxykBEyLAs
FamousNoName 3 months ago
@FamousNoName
Jet fuel + plastic burning = black smoke
Burning Jet fuel: /watch?v=kEWOSlqfFas
burning Plastic: /watch?v=Jr9oevgLwIA
Jet fuel burns at 1800F.
There was no barium nitrate (key ingredient of thermate) found in the wtc dust.
Those chips could have come from anything. There was sulpher in the drywall. There is no way enough thermite could have been hidden to cut just ONE beam let along bring a tower down.
Iron spheres are created by blowtorches, like the ones used by clean-up
MazJax 3 months ago
@MazJax Also, WTC 4 5 and 6 were much shorter than wtc7 and had more vertical supports to evenly distribute the weight. WTC7 didn't, and it was badly damaged, leading to uneven balancing and a collapse.
You need weight to cause a building collapse as well...
And look at this:
/watch?v=eWpOfUMz6SE
MazJax 3 months ago
@MazJax Jet Fuel
Flash point > 38 °C (100.4 °F)
Autoignition temperature 210 °C (410 °F)
Freezing point < −47 °C (−52.6 °)
Open air burning temperatures 260-315 °C (500-599 °F)
Density at 15 °C (59 °F) 0.775 kg/L to 0.840 kg/L
/watch?v=JZNQq7XBLwc /watch?v=Q6ziLE23Soo /watch?v=XkXeNawHFFo /watch?v=gJy7lhVK2xE
Im done trying to reason with you because you clearly ignore all science & just make crap up to keep your fairytale from falling apart. I feel sorry for you
FamousNoName 3 months ago
@FamousNoName I see you trust wikipedia LOL
Are you going to deny the truthers that also know jet fuel can burn at 1800 degrees F? They're the ones that keep saying the melting point of steel is way above the 1800 degrees F fires!
MazJax 2 months ago
@FamousNoName The initial crash blocked out the signal WNYW was broadcasting from (the north tower). The camera was stationed away from the towers, and the sound of the aircraft hitting the building took, by my calculations, 1.7 seconds from when the blackout occurs, thus telling us that the videographer is about 350 - 400 feet away from 1WTC. Your argument is retarded, much like you.
cod7strats 4 months ago
@cod7strats Yeh, that seems possible, but I think you didn't take notice of my first point. When video communication is interrupted, there is nearly alwys a break in the audio. It should crack and become distorted. Skype, satellite TV or video feeds are prime examples. Lost of signal doesn't explain the focus shift or thud either.
Look at a few of the links I gave to the other guy.
FamousNoName 4 months ago
@FamousNoName note one thing: 'nearly'. The communication wasn't broken, only shrouded momentarily by the impact on the tower.
cod7strats 4 months ago
And just to remind us all, 9/11 wasn't JUST the twin towers. It was the pentagon, and the plane crash in pensilvainia. And this isn't even that hard part. Hearing people on there cell phones calling there husbands, wifes, brothers, sisters. Family. Saying- I am going to die, tell the kids i love them! THATS hard :'( fuck you osama bin loden. i hate you. and so does everyone else! I want to just shoot you in the fucking head again.
TheEmoshadows 4 months ago
funny how the anchor said, did a plane hit the world trade center?, how the fuck he could make that asseveration?
metallicaandkornrock 4 months ago
@metallicaandkornrock they were the tallest buildings next to them and the smoke was rather high.
breadsped98 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@metallicaandkornrock - funny how the anchor said, did a plane hit the world trade center?, how the fuck he could make that asseveration?"
Its obvious how he knew. The entire worlds media was sent a memo before 9/11 explaining how it would go down. All 12,806 of them LOL. Lets see, loud roar of jet followed by exploision, no more engine roar and then smoke billowing high up from the direction of WTC building (most New Yorkers know the skyline of their own city). It is not always conspiracy.
CCRider01 4 months ago
@metallicaandkornrock My wild guess is, because of the distinct roar of jet engines prior to impact.
belowthepovertyline 4 months ago
what was that cut in the film as the plane was coming in?
jupiterfreak88 4 months ago
@jupiterfreak88 It was the precise moment the plane hit the building.
The video feed was routed through a transmitter co-incidently on the north tower.
neil9327 4 months ago
Damn lucky people. I wish I was there to witness history in the making.
shottasthemovie 4 months ago
@shottasthemovie you fucking sick motherfucker....yeah, too bad you weren't there to burn alive
wazzumichael 3 months ago
one gets an idea of how big an explosion this must have been, because on every video I've seen of any of these WTC crashes there is an EM pulse that wipes out a few frames on the film... fukn sad
Relbl 4 months ago in playlist Liked
"What the hell was that..."
ACGZAJO 4 months ago
You can see the shock wave traveled through the ground much quicker than the air...everytime I see this, I know that sickingly dull thud was the sound of innocent lives being snuffed out. 10 years later and it still makes me honestly sick. God rest their souls.
punishedexistence 4 months ago
after the sound of the plane I expected to hear "holy shit!"
The sound of the plane is just sickening, gives me chills.
wannyyydilliamsss 4 months ago
what the theck was that little bump fight when it started at 0:21
Pallyprevails 4 months ago
@Pallyprevails Shockwave most likely
Bakashackleford 4 months ago
was that camera randomly playing on the ground
macmizzleable 4 months ago
IM WATCHING THIS ON THE DAY 9/11/2011 at 9:11
trethegee 4 months ago 5
@trethegee What's your point??
yooochoob 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trethegee What's your point??
yooochoob 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trethegee What's your point?
yooochoob 4 months ago
@trethegee no one cares you loser
wazzumichael 3 months ago
362 people like that thousands of people died that day
metallicarox431 4 months ago
HOW THE FUCK CAN YOU PEOPLE LIKE THIS VIDEO?!?!?!?!?!?!
Swankchief 4 months ago
Comment removed
Awesomewroter 4 months ago
@Awesomewroter ????
Swankchief 4 months ago
Comment removed
Awesomewroter 4 months ago
Comment removed
Awesomewroter 4 months ago
@Swankchief ya i just dont understand why ppl would click like :).
Awesomewroter 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Awesomewroter so that youtube doesn't delete this video and more people can see it.
Noortje92 4 months ago
why's he saying "come to us" all the time? they were blocks away from the WTC, there wasn't any danger for people there
Flow198812 4 months ago
@Flow198812 it wud be smart to leave at a gud time cuz later on there was smoke everywhere which couldof caused suffication
zackishere1 4 months ago
Comment removed
Awesomewroter 4 months ago
@Flow198812 I think he was calling to people he knew down the street.
Bakashackleford 4 months ago
USA<3
TheUncleItlof 4 months ago
whos watching these on the day 9 11
i am
darkangel17231 4 months ago
STABS OSAMAS DEAD BODY
5jasomttrt 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I've always felt the United States' response to the devastating events of September 11th should have been peaceful and reflective of our humanity. I created a video and posted it on my channel to honor those who lost their lives that morning and in the wars that followed. Peace is possible, but it has to start somewhere.
marcpedraza 4 months ago
Comment removed
Awesomewroter 4 months ago
@Awesomewroter Islam in not a race. Dumbass muslim apologist.
vicpinto1970 4 months ago
Comment removed
Awesomewroter 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o /watch?v=5qFsjdymqSk /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k /watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA /watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI /watch?v=WxqoChniKVU /watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4 /watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY /watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE /watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w /watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ /watch?v=wKuLUu7SQU4 /watch?v=dVutUGDiQN0
megamogx 4 months ago
@megamogx - wow - copying and pasting videos to watch. What a convincing argument. I don't even need to watch any of your videos to know you're a 9/11 truther.
PomingtonBear 4 months ago
The video cam goes blank at 0:20. The incredible, sonic boom from the jet was overwhelming. Horrific sound.
HDnumba1pLaYa 4 months ago
@HDnumba1pLaYa no.
johnhill96 4 months ago
@ GunsmythFrog... The people who are resposible were NOT muslim. they are terrorists. Muslims are peaceful people. terrorists are the extremists that caused it. its the ignorant fucks like you who blame the muslim religion.
soxbbgirl87 4 months ago 2
@soxbbgirl87 I blame George Yarid
namrahnotyal 4 months ago
@soxbbgirl87 Islam is a shit stain on humanity - as any religion is. At least nations that are predominately christian actually contribute to humanity. Name anything good to come out of muslim theocracy
PomingtonBear 4 months ago
Comment removed
Awesomewroter 4 months ago
@soxbbgirl87...The people who did this WERE muslim. Have you been hiding under a rock for the past 10 years you stupid bitch?
vicpinto1970 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@soxbbgirl87...The people who did this WERE muslim. Have you been hiding under a rock for the past 10 years you stupid bitch?
vicpinto1970 4 months ago
very interesting
zeppelin69801 4 months ago in playlist 11 september 2001
its sad how you see everyone normal && hear laughter then you hear the big boom:'(
thunderlipssss 4 months ago 72
@thunderlipssss
I know. That disheartens me so much.
JuicyHabboNuts 4 months ago
Hold on.. im pretty sure there are loads of webcams around new york overlooking the towers. is there no footage there?
ilil100 4 months ago
The initial impact with the building (which distorted the camera recording momentarily) is followed by the explosion of the airplane fuel within the building. This is clearly shown on the video of the impact itself. 1. the impact, 2. the fiery explosion of fuel. The siren is likely from a patrol car that may be nearby and happened to see the plane + impact and that is why it was so quick after the incident.
frow9405 4 months ago
...and also, the siren that kicks in immediately after impact is not heard on the Naudet footage at all. Sure, they filmed in different locales, obviously, but there's nothing but silence in their location after the North Tower is hit-- seems like this siren here should have been on the other clip as well?
MindSprite 4 months ago
@MindSprite that was blocks away...nyc is a big city, think about it
SocialAssasin 4 months ago
@MindSprite and you suck dick for a living so what can you do
SocialAssasin 4 months ago
@SocialAssasin a job's a job
MindSprite 4 months ago
Why does the footage alter w the impact? Did the shaking ground mess up the cam?
MindSprite 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CIA 9/11 script: Remote controlled planes, WTC 1 and 2 and 7 controlled demolition shortly after the distraction of the planes, for more confusion a missile into the pentagon, flight 93 just in the script, hijackers and osama bin laden all in the script, Bush would announce invasion plans, Harry S would get some money for silencing, free card for endless war on terrorism.
barthoedemaker 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ATTENTION: Next week, the WTC memorial will open its doors on September 11, 2011, Sunday
ck54suiza1 4 months ago
my heart sinks every time i hear that sound
godofbeats 4 months ago
rip to the innocent
jayd4ever 4 months ago
where is the footage cos i didnt see the plain make contact with the building
jackm091000 4 months ago
this is why people should disable comments for ALL 9/11 related videos out of the respect of the event. EVERYONE SHUT THE FUCK UP. go take this dumbass shit to another video.
Dancerlove21 4 months ago in playlist wtc
Why the hell is your username MohammedAtta67? Fucking people.
LickMyBasilisk 5 months ago 46
@LickMyBasilisk exactly my fucking point !
Quickshot900 4 months ago
@LickMyBasilisk Because every muslim is a terrorist.
Please stop being ignorant as fuck. Just die.
ficarra1002 4 months ago
@LickMyBasilisk Mohammed is just a name...
123marijn321 4 months ago
@LickMyBasilisk maybe this is his name, dude. allot of muslim peoples have names like mohammed or omar.
marketanarchist2011 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@marketanarchist2011 Hey idiot, Mohammad Atta was the hijacker who piloted Flight 11 into the WTC. Which is the video above.
MrBrandonXP 4 months ago
@LickMyBasilisk Maybe his name is Mohammed Atta and he was born in 1967? Fucking assumptions.
dancraggs 4 months ago
@dancraggs Hey idiot, Mohammad Atta was the hijacker who piloted Flight 11 into the WTC. Which is the video above.
MrBrandonXP 4 months ago
@MrBrandonXP Ah, my bad ;-)
dancraggs 4 months ago
@LickMyBasilisk because his name is mohammed Atta and he's 67 years old...?lol
mufffin777 4 months ago
@mufffin777 Hey idiot, Mohammad Atta was the hijacker who piloted Flight 11 into the WTC. Which is the video above.
MrBrandonXP 4 months ago
@LickMyBasilisk This ridiculous, a name doesn't mean anything. This is an example of narrow minded people like you
xoxashe 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xoxashe Hey idiot, Mohammad Atta was the hijacker who piloted Flight 11 into the WTC. Which is the video above.
MrBrandonXP 4 months ago
for everyone to lazy to read all the comments below mine...your welcome.
jkranos112 5 months ago
@lifebeyondselfnik At 21 seconds that "glitch" I believe is the actual moment of the plane crash - the fuel exploded a second later.
ATamandua 5 months ago
notice how those union thug tv techs didn't rush to pick up the camera and shoot the video of the building. I guess when you're in a union, you don't have to work hard to get the job done.
MrSickofstupidity 5 months ago
@Adamillionaire123 ...says the Christian. I'm sure that every person would/will say that about their own religion.
200903433 5 months ago
watch?v=2MHy6yy3Z00
EvilKnievel1980 5 months ago
check
EvilKnievel1980 5 months ago
those engine sounds don't meet the normal turbofan engines effect what Boeing 767 use....
EvilKnievel1980 5 months ago
Fucking Muslim pieces of shit! Kill each other off and stay in the fucking sand country
playa4lif4891 5 months ago
@Adamillionaire123 Yeah. A Muslim saying that about Islam has just as much evidence of that than you do. In fact, they have more. At least Mohammad is a figure of history. Nobody knows whether or not Jesus is or is not, in fact, a made up messiah.
Territomauvais 5 months ago
@Territomauvais True... but this also verifies Mohammad's acts of extremist violence.. I'm atheist myself but Islam is just plain cowardice.
lizardman563 5 months ago
God....that is so erie.
liz326522 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (Donated) For Debates And Governance
Topics: THE WEAPON THAT CAN BREAK THE CYCLE OF WAR AND TERRORISM, Debated Issues, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
balanceddiet.yolasite.com
balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
SPREAD THIS BOOK IF YOU HAVE CARE FOR ALL THE VICTIMS OF WAR AND TERRORISM WORLDWIDE.
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
Scary
movienator2 5 months ago
if we didnt have muslims none of this would happen
MrFishman113 5 months ago
@MrFishman113 | yeah! cos then bush and cheney and gates and every american federal agency wouldn't have been able to blame it on them if they hadn't existed!!! damn muslims!!! how dare they let themselves exist so that bush and cheney and gates could use them to cover up murdering thousands of people!!!! damn muslims!!!
dljc1979 5 months ago
Comment removed
Awesomewroter 4 months ago
Comment removed
dljc1979