Id rather have a ex-military air force pilot to fly my plane/flight. Too much computer interfering is bad, because who makes the computer system, programs etc? Yeah we do so they are only as good as the people who make them.
And having the pilots rely on computers to fly the plane rather than having the actual pilot FLY the plane is what causes problems in this day and age because they dont gain experience thru actual flight they get used to computers doing it for them.
The computers in a plane are lifesaving. In the future, i think we will see completely computer-flown planes, human error is too often the reason for planes to crash!
The more technological they become, the more errors can occure. Simple is always best, compare and old mercedes to a new mercedes. The old ones last alot longer, and almost indestructable and engine and body, the new ones have to much tech that can go wrong.
@utoober905 no it's a fact buddy, I have my own company, and have many friends who own garages, they all say the same.. It's the same with planes basically. To much computer it never good. The A380 computer on the Qantas accident lately, said it couldn't land...while the pilots knew it could.
The speed of the planes destruction indicates one very strong possible cause, I refer to the impact of space debris or junk and this should be investigated ASAP. A space debris impact is more powerful than any weapon and destroys the victim instantly in mid air. I believe space debris also caused the PA103 disaster and I also believe the investigators know this has most likely caused many other air disasters. Put JOHN HALL SPACE DEBRIS in your UK Google slot
Airbus aircraft are logistical and engineering marvel. The blame for a catastrophic failure lies in the fact each part is manufactured in various countries. If one part fails, the country involved is going to face the blame. Black boxes were found, time to reach a conclusion.
Does anyone know why Pratt and Whitney fitted A330s fly more stable than Those with General Electric. Qantas uses General Electric on its A330s and they had an accident.
i think that the unorthodox shape and design of the a330 control surface make it hard to conduct the intense manual controls needed to take the plane out of the stall
I like how their simulation includes experienced pilots who were WARNED WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE SIMULATION. Sure, the ability to do something under expected conditions is one thing, reacting to a situation going in blindly is another thing. Pilot decision making IN THE MOMENT is crucial. It includes everything from flying the plane, navigation and communication. Conducting these 3 tasks in that order is of particular importance.
@ledair44 There is no "trying to figure out what a computer is doing" in these three steps. Hence, I sure hope our computer operators today know how to fly when manual control is needed. Also, planes are flown by one person, not one person per control surface. Sometimes I wish we don't have this much dependence on flight computers.
Not knowing much about planes this may be a stupid suggestion, but if the recovery procedure when the airspeed is unknown is to increase the engines speed to 85% of the capacity and to increase pitch, why does the auto pilot not undertake this before disengaging when all readings are lost?
@sdb611100 Well, because the computer doesn't know exactly what is happening. It loses data, but when it does so, automatic leveling may be not what is really needed to be done, situations may be different. There are pilots in the cocpit to take decisions... At least they're supposed to...
twa 800 was a terrorist attack and these so called investigators sabotaged it and covered tit up.....fact is the many witnesses saw the missiles strike the plane, the fact is it was a terrorist attack....and the faa was actuallly blocked most of the investigation byt the stealing parts of the airctraft fbi
@Koovode Yup, they found out that it was a pilot error. When they lost the speed readings, the youngest pilot took the manual control and punched the nose up, keeping it that way for a long time. They eventually lost speed and started going down, real fast. Then he gave controls to the more senior pilot, but it was too late.
@Koovode Yup, no prob. What bothers me is why they left the junior fly the plane when STALL was screaming all over the cabin. As far as I remember, they did eventually regain the readings, when the pitots de-iced sometime in their descent. It was an obvious crisis, they should have had the most senior fly the plane. I remember reading that the captain actually did check in to the cockpit, but it was way too late. The crew just didn't have the proper training ... cost their lives ... :(
i think they found the black box in May 2011, and it support the conclusion that the plane stalled and crew never recover the control; RIP all of them
Maybe that plane go to bermuda triangle that they crash for no reason.
rifky07101 1 day ago
great quality. Thanks for the upload!
mapleleafs8155 1 week ago in playlist Liked videos
@mapleleafs8155 No problem at all! :)
chernwei5784 1 week ago
@mapleleafs8155 No problem at all. Glad u liked it. :)
chernwei5784 4 days ago
Id rather have a ex-military air force pilot to fly my plane/flight. Too much computer interfering is bad, because who makes the computer system, programs etc? Yeah we do so they are only as good as the people who make them.
And having the pilots rely on computers to fly the plane rather than having the actual pilot FLY the plane is what causes problems in this day and age because they dont gain experience thru actual flight they get used to computers doing it for them.
OpticalSnare 1 week ago
The computers in a plane are lifesaving. In the future, i think we will see completely computer-flown planes, human error is too often the reason for planes to crash!
HomerJay1983 2 weeks ago
The more technological they become, the more errors can occure. Simple is always best, compare and old mercedes to a new mercedes. The old ones last alot longer, and almost indestructable and engine and body, the new ones have to much tech that can go wrong.
barthoedemaker 1 month ago
@barthoedemaker talk out of your butt much?
utoober905 2 weeks ago
@utoober905 no it's a fact buddy, I have my own company, and have many friends who own garages, they all say the same.. It's the same with planes basically. To much computer it never good. The A380 computer on the Qantas accident lately, said it couldn't land...while the pilots knew it could.
barthoedemaker 2 weeks ago
The speed of the planes destruction indicates one very strong possible cause, I refer to the impact of space debris or junk and this should be investigated ASAP. A space debris impact is more powerful than any weapon and destroys the victim instantly in mid air. I believe space debris also caused the PA103 disaster and I also believe the investigators know this has most likely caused many other air disasters. Put JOHN HALL SPACE DEBRIS in your UK Google slot
RAISpaceDebris 1 month ago
Airbus aircraft are logistical and engineering marvel. The blame for a catastrophic failure lies in the fact each part is manufactured in various countries. If one part fails, the country involved is going to face the blame. Black boxes were found, time to reach a conclusion.
speedfast01 1 month ago
You are welcome. I love this video. Thats not a Hollywood movie. Thats real. We are alive. Thank God for that :)
lesrambles1 1 month ago
Great video.
lesrambles1 1 month ago
@lesrambles1 Thanks! :)
chernwei5784 1 month ago
so called "pilots" can't even physically fly a plane. what have they been playing microsoft flight simulator?
str8ridah786 1 month ago
wow, they figured all of this out WITHOUT the black box, they were almost right, they just left out certain details!!!
MrBobbi1980 2 months ago
Does anyone know why Pratt and Whitney fitted A330s fly more stable than Those with General Electric. Qantas uses General Electric on its A330s and they had an accident.
Honnandi 2 months ago
i think that the unorthodox shape and design of the a330 control surface make it hard to conduct the intense manual controls needed to take the plane out of the stall
safwan321 2 months ago
Those pilots were close though, sooo close to saving everyone.
ledair44 2 months ago
I like how their simulation includes experienced pilots who were WARNED WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE SIMULATION. Sure, the ability to do something under expected conditions is one thing, reacting to a situation going in blindly is another thing. Pilot decision making IN THE MOMENT is crucial. It includes everything from flying the plane, navigation and communication. Conducting these 3 tasks in that order is of particular importance.
ledair44 2 months ago
@ledair44 There is no "trying to figure out what a computer is doing" in these three steps. Hence, I sure hope our computer operators today know how to fly when manual control is needed. Also, planes are flown by one person, not one person per control surface. Sometimes I wish we don't have this much dependence on flight computers.
ledair44 2 months ago
Not knowing much about planes this may be a stupid suggestion, but if the recovery procedure when the airspeed is unknown is to increase the engines speed to 85% of the capacity and to increase pitch, why does the auto pilot not undertake this before disengaging when all readings are lost?
sdb611100 2 months ago
@sdb611100 Well, because the computer doesn't know exactly what is happening. It loses data, but when it does so, automatic leveling may be not what is really needed to be done, situations may be different. There are pilots in the cocpit to take decisions... At least they're supposed to...
FastGreenFCF 1 month ago
twa 800 was a terrorist attack and these so called investigators sabotaged it and covered tit up.....fact is the many witnesses saw the missiles strike the plane, the fact is it was a terrorist attack....and the faa was actuallly blocked most of the investigation byt the stealing parts of the airctraft fbi
RobinMosley24 3 months ago
i dont think they recover black boxes......i didnt hear any newssssssssss.........
Koovode 3 months ago
@Koovode Boxes were recovered half a year ago.
Rammkopf 2 months ago
@Rammkopf, then what is the cause of this disaster......did they found anything from black boxes.......?
Koovode 2 months ago
@Koovode Yup, they found out that it was a pilot error. When they lost the speed readings, the youngest pilot took the manual control and punched the nose up, keeping it that way for a long time. They eventually lost speed and started going down, real fast. Then he gave controls to the more senior pilot, but it was too late.
Rammkopf 2 months ago
@Rammkopf it means pitot tube blocked with supercooled water,that's why they lost speed reading right.....thanks dear.
Koovode 2 months ago
@Koovode correct. Loss of airspeed is covered in the QRH though so it shouldn't bring down a plane.
gdwnet 2 months ago
@Koovode Yup, no prob. What bothers me is why they left the junior fly the plane when STALL was screaming all over the cabin. As far as I remember, they did eventually regain the readings, when the pitots de-iced sometime in their descent. It was an obvious crisis, they should have had the most senior fly the plane. I remember reading that the captain actually did check in to the cockpit, but it was way too late. The crew just didn't have the proper training ... cost their lives ... :(
Rammkopf 2 months ago
@zupels007 Tenerife
handphonefan 3 months ago
This is i think the 2nd worst disaster in aviation history.
handphonefan 3 months ago
i think they found the black box in May 2011, and it support the conclusion that the plane stalled and crew never recover the control; RIP all of them
polarhunter 4 months ago