This piece played by an orchestra is slower. However, when performed on piano, a quicker tempo is adopted because the piano is unable to fully replicate the variety of harmony and sound created by the use of multiple instruments... as such, a quicker tempo makes it more exciting, and keeps the audience from being bored.
The dramatic crescendi on single chords are a pinnacle of this movement. As we know, this is impossible to do on a piano, thus we lose something, which again means one should add something. I suppose speed works. =)
hi i have a school project and i was wondering if you guys knew when this piece of music was intended to play i mean like live. if you could tell me thanks alot ive been searching all day and ive had no luck.
@chengwei1405 I believe what they meant was they wanted to know if this was intended to be a performance piece, or if it was meant to be a piano reduction used as a rehearsal aid
Hey, Cheng! Holst wrote the two piano version because he had neuritis in his right arm which prevented him from playing over the scores. He asked two of his colleagues if they could play the piano version in his soundproof music room, and then later on gave explicit detail on the piano version as to how the orchestration should be written out. The colleagues then wrote out the final intended orchestration.
hey! i love the colours in this piece and i think you have brought them out really well! it's so much easier to like the orchestral version because the different instruments bring these qualities out really easily, it's definitely a difficult job to try to do that with pianos.
I wish there was a tutorial. I can't read sheet music, believe me I tried...and I'm just not smart enough I guess.
TheMaliciousStorm 8 months ago
wow... great ^^
hanullQa 1 year ago
I liked this a lot!
You played this with passion keeping the essence to it all!
willybass123 2 years ago
would this be a little bit too fast? and starting from 1:07 it became somewhat "swing" instead of dotted
iwanabana 2 years ago 4
most conductors ask for a slower tempo, but this is similar to the tempo holst used in conducting his recordings.
hoogieboogieland 2 years ago
that is because that in the past, time wasn't sufficient and then music had to be played a lot faster than it should be
iwanabana 2 years ago
This piece played by an orchestra is slower. However, when performed on piano, a quicker tempo is adopted because the piano is unable to fully replicate the variety of harmony and sound created by the use of multiple instruments... as such, a quicker tempo makes it more exciting, and keeps the audience from being bored.
chengwei1405 2 years ago
The dramatic crescendi on single chords are a pinnacle of this movement. As we know, this is impossible to do on a piano, thus we lose something, which again means one should add something. I suppose speed works. =)
Pladask 2 years ago 2
@hoogieboogieland according to wikipedia, the recordings were played at a faster tempo so they could fit on the records they used to record them
barytonezeb 1 year ago
You're absolutely right!
ianmike6791 2 years ago
I play the cello, and our high school orchestra conductor told us off for playing that bit too swing-y today. An interesting coincidence.
icanhasheadache 1 year ago
hahaha i wish i had the chance to play this song...
i sing in choir, and all the others sing dotted rhythm as swing...and i wonder why.
iwanabana 1 year ago
It sounds pretty goofy if done as swing. It's not Mars, Bringer of Funk. War!!
icanhasheadache 1 year ago
Comment removed
iwanabana 2 years ago
Sorry for the double post, but for one pianist, not several
movie825 3 years ago
there is no one piano version to my knowledge.
chengwei1405 3 years ago
imslp . org / wiki / The_Planets,_Op.32_(Holst,_Gustav)
At the bottom is a Solo Piano version
bagnewauckland 2 years ago
Where would I get a free copy of this music? Yes yes, I'm cheap.
movie825 3 years ago 5
hi i have a school project and i was wondering if you guys knew when this piece of music was intended to play i mean like live. if you could tell me thanks alot ive been searching all day and ive had no luck.
meza321 3 years ago
hey. I don't really understand what u mean 'when this piece of music was intended to play' explain?
chengwei1405 3 years ago
@chengwei1405 I believe what they meant was they wanted to know if this was intended to be a performance piece, or if it was meant to be a piano reduction used as a rehearsal aid
sijemeurtcesoir 1 year ago
i am a massive music fan, and to be honest; this is my favourite piece of music ever :)
good structure, everything is amazing.
paigemeow 3 years ago
ye thats what i mean. when was it intended to play like for the first time live.
meza321 3 years ago
IT IS VERY FAST !
DODECASONICO 3 years ago
Hey, Cheng! Holst wrote the two piano version because he had neuritis in his right arm which prevented him from playing over the scores. He asked two of his colleagues if they could play the piano version in his soundproof music room, and then later on gave explicit detail on the piano version as to how the orchestration should be written out. The colleagues then wrote out the final intended orchestration.
CrazyPianist122792 3 years ago
interesting
Bob65001 2 years ago
hey! i love the colours in this piece and i think you have brought them out really well! it's so much easier to like the orchestral version because the different instruments bring these qualities out really easily, it's definitely a difficult job to try to do that with pianos.
very well done, bravo! :D
mmaow 3 years ago
great playing
keep it up!
jaws93 3 years ago