Of course I kinda feel pissed off than my GTX295 doesn't support Direct X 11 (although from a performance point of view, it easily could - it'S just a "lock" Nividia has imposed upon it, just like the Crysis DX9 Very High settings lock), but the differences are so small that ever soembody with DX9 wouldn't really notice.
This is just a good fuc*ing waste of debelopment. Directx 11 isn't bringing anything new, this same results can be achieved in previous direct3d engines.
How about working on animation transitions!, cloth physics or real direct lighting instead of workarounds (ssao) instead of barely noticeable polygons.
dam ppl all these new technology come without a hit in framerate. its rather the exact opposite!. physX for water gonna take a hit on ur framerate for SURE!
Been there done that in DX 9 . And don't tell me this isn't just another advertising game to show of the " impresing " capabilities of DX 11 as Crysis did with DX 10 until someone accidentaly hacked it. And the result ? DX 10 graphics on XP .
The game doesn't look impressive with DirectX 11 since the audience aren't that dynamic and the water is pretty old. The water dynamic technology should be touched with physic as the car is actually splashing in.
The game needs to focus on more of the weather and the dynamic environment.
ach ich könnt mir vorstellen dass das einfach die bewegungen deutlich schneller werden wodurch die videoquali sinkt, die screenshots die ich bis jetz gesehen hab waren alle knackscharf.
skate. hat großartiges motion blur, das bemerkt man gar nich bis man mal drauf achtet.
The water is wrong, despite it reacts to the car it would splash in real life
ebarron987 8 months ago
It looks the same as my xbox...........for DirectX12 try something that actually enhances a game, like Lighting, physics, or destructability
JuniorProducer1996 1 year ago
@GodRikudou well it slows down when you play it...dirt 2 is a great game
Smenu10 1 year ago
I love how they hold back dx9 .
I'm glad I pirated the game.
PSPfanBOY22 1 year ago
Commento rimosso dall'autore
aureliuso 2 years ago
See how they show a video with DX9 vs 11?
And not DX10 vs 11?
It's because the differences are so small that they have to take the pre-previous version of Direct X to increase the differences. Sheesh...
Griesmayer 2 years ago
Yes, you're right. I think the same thing.
Sergio0694 2 years ago
That's how I found this video. I was searching for Dirt 2 Direct X 10 vs 11 haha.
GatorHighlights3 1 year ago
Of course I kinda feel pissed off than my GTX295 doesn't support Direct X 11 (although from a performance point of view, it easily could - it'S just a "lock" Nividia has imposed upon it, just like the Crysis DX9 Very High settings lock), but the differences are so small that ever soembody with DX9 wouldn't really notice.
Griesmayer 1 year ago
This is just a good fuc*ing waste of debelopment. Directx 11 isn't bringing anything new, this same results can be achieved in previous direct3d engines.
How about working on animation transitions!, cloth physics or real direct lighting instead of workarounds (ssao) instead of barely noticeable polygons.
Diegog5 2 years ago 9
@Diegog5 buy the game your self with a card that supports DX11
then run it in DX9
its the only way you will se the HUGE diffrence between the 2
games are actually going to supposrt this new directx engine
not just dirt 2 but many more games
klote2314 1 year ago
dam ppl all these new technology come without a hit in framerate. its rather the exact opposite!. physX for water gonna take a hit on ur framerate for SURE!
rrXIII 2 years ago
Been there done that in DX 9 . And don't tell me this isn't just another advertising game to show of the " impresing " capabilities of DX 11 as Crysis did with DX 10 until someone accidentaly hacked it. And the result ? DX 10 graphics on XP .
Sebi4Ade 2 years ago
Wie heißt der Song der da läuft? Klingt echt nice! :D
ReDsPiKe1 2 years ago
hamma o.O
Wendsche 2 years ago
kaum einer wird das spiel spielen können , also wie dumm muss eine firma sein und so ein spiel rausbringen :D
fotljubei 2 years ago
warum soll dass keiner zocken können vlt du mit deiner shrott kiste nicht^^
Techno0Raver1992 2 years ago
not rly ich hab schon recht guten pc
fotljubei 2 years ago
und 0 Ahnung -.-
ObihoernchenDE 2 years ago
na dann egal^^
Techno0Raver1992 2 years ago
^^^^^^^^^^^^
fotljubei 2 years ago
The game doesn't look impressive with DirectX 11 since the audience aren't that dynamic and the water is pretty old. The water dynamic technology should be touched with physic as the car is actually splashing in.
The game needs to focus on more of the weather and the dynamic environment.
iHateEmoPeoplesz 2 years ago
I thought the water and crowd was pretty damn impressive!
And the water does get affected by the car, what did you JUST see? and the water splasehs aswell .. What did you JUST see?
And honestly, that many people.. are you expecting to walk amongst them? They aren't the focus of attention when you drive.
TorMartinDy 2 years ago 2
It wasn't a real splash. It was a material sprite splash. I'm talking about physic from Nvidia kind of technology of water.
iHateEmoPeoplesz 2 years ago
PhysX? I see where you come from now, that would be good.
TorMartinDy 2 years ago
Failed Spammer below me.
iHateEmoPeoplesz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Comment removed by author
TheSpike762 2 years ago
Comment removed
GTAvideoeditor 2 years ago
Comment removed
GTAvideoeditor 2 years ago
Comment removed
GTAvideoeditor 2 years ago
Comment removed
GTAvideoeditor 2 years ago
Comment removed
GTAvideoeditor 2 years ago
Comment removed
GTAvideoeditor 2 years ago
Comment removed
GTAvideoeditor 2 years ago
Comment removed
GTAvideoeditor 2 years ago
Comment removed
GTAvideoeditor 2 years ago
Comment removed
GTAvideoeditor 2 years ago
why they compare dx9 physx to dx11 why they dont compare dx10 to dx11
club4ghz 2 years ago
Because dx10 and dx9 are the same thing
Kabolte 2 years ago
ore mayby they dont do it becose dx10 and dx11 iss the same think
club4ghz 2 years ago
and this car wave in watter was posible to do in open gl 5 years ago its nothink new:P
club4ghz 2 years ago
GG.
LiangHuBBB 2 years ago
The water tessellation looks fantastic.
RUDY2295 2 years ago 2
Tesselation seems useless, but the lighting looks quite stunning
send2nik 2 years ago
faszinierende wasserspiegelungen
CradleToCoffin 2 years ago
Geil! Aber das Post Processing verursacht mal wieder Augenkrebs.
mpx1 2 years ago
welchen effekt meinst du genau?
NiNm62 2 years ago
Comment removed
mpx1 2 years ago
Ab 0:53 wirds irgendwie unscharf, so wie man es halt von schlechtem PP gewohnt ist.
mpx1 2 years ago
ach ich könnt mir vorstellen dass das einfach die bewegungen deutlich schneller werden wodurch die videoquali sinkt, die screenshots die ich bis jetz gesehen hab waren alle knackscharf.
skate. hat großartiges motion blur, das bemerkt man gar nich bis man mal drauf achtet.
NiNm62 2 years ago
Lol. nothing groundbreaking like i expected. DX11 seems to fail as DX10 did.
deepakm 2 years ago
It's okay - OpenGL 3 was a big flop too.
AnarchistDictator 2 years ago
nice!!!!!!!!!!
Fulda93 2 years ago
sieht ja besser aus wie im richtigen leben =D
flipphuso 2 years ago
Hammer Geil!!!
Kleinwo 2 years ago
That is amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
xfas2 2 years ago