Added: 2 years ago
From: PCGamesHardware
Views: 50,805
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The water is wrong, despite it reacts to the car it would splash in real life

  • It looks the same as my xbox...........for DirectX12 try something that actually enhances a game, like Lighting, physics, or destructability

  • @GodRikudou well it slows down when you play it...dirt 2 is a great game

  • I love how they hold back dx9 .

    I'm glad I pirated the game.

  • Commento rimosso dall'autore

  • See how they show a video with DX9 vs 11?

    And not DX10 vs 11?

    It's because the differences are so small that they have to take the pre-previous version of Direct X to increase the differences. Sheesh...

  • Yes, you're right. I think the same thing.

  • That's how I found this video. I was searching for Dirt 2 Direct X 10 vs 11 haha.

  • Of course I kinda feel pissed off than my GTX295 doesn't support Direct X 11 (although from a performance point of view, it easily could - it'S just a "lock" Nividia has imposed upon it, just like the Crysis DX9 Very High settings lock), but the differences are so small that ever soembody with DX9 wouldn't really notice.

  • This is just a good fuc*ing waste of debelopment. Directx 11 isn't bringing anything new, this same results can be achieved in previous direct3d engines.

    How about working on animation transitions!, cloth physics or real direct lighting instead of workarounds (ssao) instead of barely noticeable polygons.

  • @Diegog5 buy the game your self with a card that supports DX11

    then run it in DX9

    its the only way you will se the HUGE diffrence between the 2

    games are actually going to supposrt this new directx engine

    not just dirt 2 but many more games

  • dam ppl all these new technology come without a hit in framerate. its rather the exact opposite!. physX for water gonna take a hit on ur framerate for SURE!

  • Been there done that in DX 9 . And don't tell me this isn't just another advertising game to show of the " impresing " capabilities of DX 11 as Crysis did with DX 10 until someone accidentaly hacked it. And the result ? DX 10 graphics on XP .

  • Wie heißt der Song der da läuft? Klingt echt nice! :D

  • hamma o.O

  • kaum einer wird das spiel spielen können , also wie dumm muss eine firma sein und so ein spiel rausbringen :D

  • warum soll dass keiner zocken können vlt du mit deiner shrott kiste nicht^^

  • not rly ich hab schon recht guten pc

  • und 0 Ahnung -.-

  • na dann egal^^

  • ^^^^^^^^^^^^

  • The game doesn't look impressive with DirectX 11 since the audience aren't that dynamic and the water is pretty old. The water dynamic technology should be touched with physic as the car is actually splashing in.

    The game needs to focus on more of the weather and the dynamic environment.

  • I thought the water and crowd was pretty damn impressive!

    And the water does get affected by the car, what did you JUST see? and the water splasehs aswell .. What did you JUST see?

    And honestly, that many people.. are you expecting to walk amongst them? They aren't the focus of attention when you drive.

  • It wasn't a real splash. It was a material sprite splash. I'm talking about physic from Nvidia kind of technology of water.

  • PhysX? I see where you come from now, that would be good.

  • Failed Spammer below me.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • why they compare dx9 physx to dx11 why they dont compare dx10 to dx11

  • Because dx10 and dx9 are the same thing

  • ore mayby they dont do it becose dx10 and dx11 iss the same think

  • and this car wave in watter was posible to do in open gl 5 years ago its nothink new:P

  • GG.

  • The water tessellation looks fantastic.

  • Tesselation seems useless, but the lighting looks quite stunning

  • faszinierende wasserspiegelungen

  • Geil! Aber das Post Processing verursacht mal wieder Augenkrebs.

  • welchen effekt meinst du genau?

  • Comment removed

  • Ab 0:53 wirds irgendwie unscharf, so wie man es halt von schlechtem PP gewohnt ist.

  • ach ich könnt mir vorstellen dass das einfach die bewegungen deutlich schneller werden wodurch die videoquali sinkt, die screenshots die ich bis jetz gesehen hab waren alle knackscharf.

    skate. hat großartiges motion blur, das bemerkt man gar nich bis man mal drauf achtet.

  • Lol. nothing groundbreaking like i expected. DX11 seems to fail as DX10 did.

  • It's okay - OpenGL 3 was a big flop too.

  • nice!!!!!!!!!!

  • sieht ja besser aus wie im richtigen leben =D

  • Hammer Geil!!!

  • That is amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more