Is this video a joke? That's not a crocadillian at all! One of the thousands of dead givaways is the zygomatic arch and the dentary. I knew creationists have difficulty with attention to detail and professionalism, but what the hell is this horse crap?!
Excellent video...keep up the good work, It's always hilarious watching evo's prop up their false religion with false interpretations of the evidence.
The Kutchicetus you show in the video is not a crocodilian, as you claim, it is a mammal. That is demonstrated by a number of anatomical features, including the structure in the lower jaw.
The Kutchicetus you show in the video is not a crocodilian, as you claim, iti s mammal. That is demontstrated by a number of anatomical features, including the structure in the lower jaw.
Mammals like the mammal fossil shown here have dentary-squamosal jaw joints. Where reptiles and quadrate-articular. Those skulls were mammalian not crocodilian.
I love how creationists see that an animal looks vaguely like something and then jump to a radical conclusion. Like how they said that Pakicetus looks like a dog. It's laughable, if pakicetus looks like a dog, so do cows, cats, goats, lions...
I can see you came to the debate with an open mind. There's nothing like telling someone they're a liar when they comment on something you don't like. Having said that you seem to revel in a kind of deliberate misinformation which I find particularly crass and unworthy of anyone who wishes to be taken seriously. Your iterative jokes are quite crude and your dismissal of that which you clearly don't understand is laughable. Then the dreary tautology from your comment cap it all. How sad.
{I can see you came to the debate with an open mind}
Exactly! That's why I can see the huge differences between the fossil's actual forms & the ridiculously altered artist's renderings. Something a close minded predetermining Evoist like yourself apparently can't see
{There's nothing like telling someone they're a liar when they comment on something you don't like}
If anyone comments on something I don't like, then I won't see it. Being that I don't view videos with a subject matter
I guess I should have expected such a poor response but 5 of them ? whoa that's a lot. I wonder what you say to those who dare to disagree with your precious opinions to your face? Still, no matter, I can see it's a complete waste of time to continue to speak with you. I'll leave you to be ignored and to your love of hating something that will continue to inspire millions of minds immeasurably superior to yours i.e: open ones.
Thata girl... way to explain the fact that when you actually present explanations that support your assertions it can't be done with simply 500 lousy characters. Particularly with something like "science", the under 500 character, unsupported, mere assertions are for the other, "dummy" guys, aren't they DrDrivel?
Yea, those "poor responders" really are audaciously hypocritical, aren't they DrFrivol?
"Disagree with me to my face"? Thats right... "still, no matter", since those ignorant
respond from exactly the same position which they held when you first ignored them by initially commenting on their video
Provoking more of their unexpected, already known view simply to ignore it is the only correct, Evo intelligent way to deal with such people
Thus is why it's impossible to measure the superiority of the millions of minds that oppose mine & that recognize that empiricism is for inspiration. Much like that other purely objective thing called "art" is also inspiring
{Having said that you seem to revel in a kind of deliberate misinformation}
Not quite "revel". I much more tend to "repel" things like Piltdown, Nebraska, Java, Neanderthal, "Lucy And Some Guy With Grinders", Ida needa get real, drawn embryos, Chinese Dino-Bird, Tyrannosaurus Chicken etc. etc. etc.
{I find particularly crass and unworthy of anyone who wishes to be taken seriously}
Personally, I find crass, deliberate disinformation to be extremely worthy of the reveling
liars who wished to be taken seriously when they postulated the above mentioned list of fallaciously foul frauds
{Your iterative jokes are quite crude}
I've noticed evolutionists to not at all even attempt to be humorous. Comical is a characteristic that's incompatible with the continual worrisome weariness derived from the possibility of being discovered to be a bunch of shystering hoaxsters with a stupendously shitty spiel of ancestral amoebian forebearers
{dismissal of that which you clearly don't understand is laughable}
Your comments emanate with the seriousness of a loons lamentation rather than with laughter. But that's simply due to my effectively dismissing refutations of ridiculously whale sized fish tales. Refutations which you completely fail to directly address, due to the dismissive nature of your weak argument
HAHA!! Great video. You have me laughing my.....uh..area of my body that used to have a tail before it "evolved away"(do they still go with that one?)...Off.
Thank you jgong, I appreciate it. The evolution/creation scene around YouTube is so heavily infested with the overwhelming majority of poor, censored, princess primates that one like yours is a rare but well enjoyed comment
Of course, with the waves from the Ork population being automatic 1 star voters, it's being made certain that all is well at YouTube with censorship suppressed into non existence... much like whale transitionals only not nearly as non existent
If you can't see that the headless animals, having simply a huge mouth with jagged teeth and two eyeballs on top are Crocodilian, then you definitely are an Evolutionist
I can't think of any 4 legged Mammal that doesn't have its legs directly underneath it's body, supporting it's weight. Those elongated bodied fossils with seeing jaws in place of heads, have legs going out horizontally from the sides of their bodies before the legs bend downward, vertically at the elbow. Just like reptiles do
*If you can't see that the headless animals, having simply a huge mouth with jagged teeth and two eyeballs on top are Crocodilian, then you definitely are an Evolutionist
Based on that you would probably classify Orca as crocodilian. XD
I think you seriously need to take a look at crocodilian skull and then take a second look at Pakicetid and Protocetid skulls.
here's a helpful hint. Crocodilians do not have double rooted teeth, neither do they have mandible made from single bone.
Apparently not anymore they don't. But as you can see with Chihuahuas & Great Danes, "variation" can be quite ranged. However, do you care to comment about the legs thing. The fact that 4 legged mammals have their legs directly underneath their body is something that's long been noted as a distinctive feature that identifies mammals from the rest
Are you seriously claiming that crocodiles are mammals?
That you actually can't tell the difference?
Why is it that creationists insist on sharing your arrogance and ignorance together in such a detestable cocktail and yet still believe they are advocating truth?
Where did this Morphological Magpie come from? Heckle, where did you leave Jeckle? How in all of the Simianite's ape-wannabe, bubble world did you ever conclude that I'm the 1 claiming that Crocodilians are mammals? I'm the one pointing out that it's your Primateological PhD pals that are claiming Crocodilians are Mammals. Yea, thats what I'm asking, you bunch of morpholobotomized mutards actually can't tell the difference?
You must be a Romanite Catholelicker. Arrogant & ignorant like no other
Your Sumerian Simianite, fish hat poppa would be proud of your easily manipulated, ignorantly proud, baboon ass. Just don't let him take your little baboon butt boy's ass out for one of those Romanite special, "Detestable Cocktails". Simply because no matter how many priceless renaissance statues & paintings he owns, still, he holds out the broke basket in the ghetto. That means he'll claim to have enough for only 1 cocktail & will split it with you. You get the cock, while he gets the tail
Sheep says, 'But just look at it! It doesn't look like a whale. I mean....just....look! Are you going to believe the experts in the field that spend their lives attempting to connect all living things on earth, or are you going to believe me because I think these drawings look funny? Think for YOURSELVES and listen to ME, not the experts!'
i am going to post a personal message by chuichupachichi:
Sorry A15, I accidentally clicked the "remove" link instead of the "reply". I don't want you or anyone to think that I "sensor" anybody's opinions on any of my videos.
Therefor, here is a "paste" of your comment that I "copied" from my G-Mail YouTube alert service. You might want to paste & copy it back on the video page of - "Evolutions Transitionals Don't Exist"
"You sound like you're using the existence of muta
tions and genetic change, good you used scientific knowledge to explain something, bad you used it as an explanation as to why one could believe in that knowledge, a direct contradiction, which renders your statement useless, but you were joking (i hope), and ill forgive you for that."
Besides, if I eliminated them, then I wouldn't get to have the fun in replying to them. For when one is engaged in a conflict or debate, you'd be surprised at how extremely advantageous it is to actually have "t.
Of course, some would feel disgusted from my having stated this. Since delusion effectively creates the illusion which mimics the effects of the "advantageous" position.
ME-You understand that by what youre saying, you are proposing the danger that you may be delusioned, and that is why you believe that you have the upper hand, you are too delusioned to even consider this possibility. Which is why you are like "YOU ARE A MUTATIONALLY DEFECTED IDIOT", amirite?
Firstly, you omitted part of my phrase - "When engaged in a debate, you'd be surprised to find out how extremely advantageous it is to actually have truth on your side"
Secondly, No! Only you in your delusion, understood it that way. This is undeniably evident from the fact that you believe yourself to have ancestral Amoebian forebearers and that you evoists believe the defects that are mutants, to be the ones capable of surviving while the non defective all perish. Also, it is you that
"hen one is engaged in a conflict or debate, you'd be surprised at how extremely advantageous it is to actuallly have "truth" on one's side.", has not been ommited
believes that you are an accumulation of billions of mutations. Although that's mere delusion, you are nevertheless more defective than simply from that delusion. You are additionally defective from the cause of your belief of being a mutational accumulation while simultaneously accusing me of being the "MUTATIONALLY DEFECTED IDIOT" that you indeed are...... minus the mutation.
you can't read, you need to learn to comprehend literature what i said was "hich is why you are like "YOU ARE A MUTATIONALLY DEFECTED IDIOT", amirite?", which means, i am saying that you are the one who is calling me the matationally defected idiot, you cannot read, go back to elementary and take a reading class. What you said proves nothing, all you are doing, is saying, that i believe in a delusion, what i say is a delusion. If you think it is a delusion, i will explain evolution to you now.
Natural selection, the process which allow evolution to happen, works like this. In every single successive generation of animals, as in, the offspring of the initial population, will have several genetic differences, some may have genes which make them taller than their parents' genes allowed, some darker, etc., however these changes are almost unnoticeable. But if a specimen with genes which allow him to reproduce more can have offspring, it may spread it's genes, which over time may be (cont.
cont.) exaggerated, and they may spread these genes, so, the gene pool with the best suited genes, though this may take up to 300 yrs to be evident within that gene pool, will survive and produce more. Now what about the ones that may not be able to reproduce, yes, once the genes have been exaggerated in their pool, they may be cancelled out, or die, due to failure to survive or spread their genes, as this process goes on and on, the population begins to change over time. If you want a goo(cont.
cont.)d example of this, search pepper moth evolution, specifically, the Wikipedia article. Now evolution works best when there are things to work with, so if a lizard population is in a very watery area, and requires fish as food, the ones best suited (body shape, arm length, hand shape) will survive, and reproduce more. Now, over time, populations may get separated, and they may adapt differently to their surroundings, using the same process. Now, we undergo, Speciation. Speciation, the(cont.
cont.) process which allow macroevolution to undergo, works like this. If a population is split, and is turned into 2 separate populations, the ones with well suited genes can only spread this to their own populations, not to the other ones, so over time, they will change and be different, until that faithful moment, where their genes are too different to breed with the other population. Now, the process of micro-evolution is the same one as macro-evolution, natural-selection, but the proc(cont.
cont.) which triggers the start of macro-evolution, is speciation. Now, because i have explained that, you will know that, overtime, the population will change in traits so much so, that if it were to meet with the initial population, they couldn't breed, which is another form of, MACROEVOLUTION, and the process is also a form of, SPECIATION. Now, overtime, they become, so different, that the changes are very evident, has this ever happened, HELL YEAH. just simply search up, list of transi(cont.
cont.)tional fossils, specifically the wikipedia article, and you will see that we have a BEEEUTIFUL record of this. Has it happened in human existence, also, yes, search up, Apple Maggot Fly, and Gall Former Fly, and there is a yahoo questions post, called "Creationists, what do you think of these observed instances of speciation .(Macroevolution)?", search that up and look at the other examples, and search up the examples yourself.
additional knowledge, YES IT IS POSSIBLE FOR ONE WITH DIFFERENT CHROMOSOME COUNT, DUE TO ADDITION OR FUSION OF THE CHROMOSOMES, TO REPRODUCE WIT ONE OF DIFFERENT CHROMOSOME COUNT, IF THE GENES ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO MATING, AS IN, SIMILAR ENOUGH. i AM GOING TO HAVE FUN MAKING MY VID ABOUT HOW THE FISH BECAME TETRAPODS, BYE BYE, AND FAREWELL.
What is "muta"? I don't know what that is but nevertheless, simply the fact that you posted this whole comment with its beginning announcement shows that you perceive it to be some kind of a exposition of some supposedly hidden foul play on my part.
Do you truly need to be that desperate? I know you can't win a legitimate debate but this is ridiculous. If I had intentionally removed your comment then why are all your other ones still here? I was hoping you'd re-post it because you had said the
stupidest thing ever within that comment. I was kicking myself when I accidentally removed it because I had already been licking my chops with the anticipation of tearing your brilliantly blistered baboon ass apart in replying to it.
Maybe next time you'll take my courtesy notice & behave correctly with it. You will receive negative reinforcement from me for your ape fecal flinging
You're suggesting that this skeleton with the clearly mammalian jaw and ribcage is crocodilian? Alliteration is a poor substitute for actual knowledge.
"Poor substitute"? Its even worse when one whom like you, has neither alliteration nor knowledge. Next time gain the knowledge of exactly which of the several skeletons you're referring to. That way you can describe it to me through alliteration.
BTW, if you can somehow, mutationally accumulate enough intelligence. Perhaps, by way of selection magic or something. Please don't make it so boring next time. Try some stylish alliteration. At least make your pseudo-science lies interesting to read
Ok, i want you to stfu, and stop making videos, because, the only one who is embaressing themselves, IS YOU. You never make sense, all you do is use smart words, and he was referring to the skeletons you said were crocodillian, you never got a good score in literature did you, otherwise you would have enough intelligence to analyze the sentence and see what he was referring to. The only pseudo-science, is yours.
There are several skeletons in the video. "skevoid" said "THIS" skeleton with the clearly mammalian jaw". The Evoist video claims that "ALL" the skeletons in the video are Mammalian. Thus, they would have to all have Mammalian jaws
However, if instead of mindlessly flapping your jaw, you would STFU for once in your life & actually listen to reason & true correctness. Then you might not end up looking so stupid like one who believes he has ancestral Amoebian forebearers
actually moron, they have "two measures of teeth" so they can chew food, which verifies that it is from a mammal, it also does not ahve a crocodillian bodytype, the thickness and density of the bones can verify this, notice that it has a large hip pelvis, whereas a crocodilian pelvis is under it's ribs and tail, and very small, and has receding ribs, a MAMMAL TRAIT. The jaws are mamallian, as i pointed out too, if you see a crocodile skull, you see it;s lower jaw is up near it's eyesocket.
There's nothing wrong with stating your case when it's something within reason. Therefor, even if you're wrong it may be that your simply mistaken regarding a matter difficult to discern. But this is downright ridiculous & clearly indicates the degree to which you bunch of pathetic primate wannabe's will lie to yourselves, simply to keep your impossible nightmare on artificial life support
Go to 1:28 & take a good look at his teeth. Notice the animal doesn't have a head. It merely has a neck &
attached to it is an extremely large mouth with eyeballs on top, "Croc". You can fool yourself all you like but that mouth & those teeth wouldn't chew even a 10 lb. wad of Wrigley's. It's clearly Crocodilian. Look at 1:33 - Mammals usually have their legs straight down underneath their body, directly supporting their weight. Reptiles, as with these particular examples, have their legs out to the sides without direct support underneath their body
yes, so are you claiming a whale is not a mammal, as its fins dont go down, this is clearly an evolved trait, mine aren't claims, mine are references to qualified scientist research. Bye Bye, and eyeballs on top? Its more in the form of a legged dolphin rather than a crocodile, simply search up dolphin skull and you can see a relation, not a direct one but one that indicates a possible relation, also, as you claim they aren't whales, THEY ACTUALLY ARE WHALES, proto-whales.
Man, you truly are one helluva grade A Jackass, aren't you? The way you argue, twisting & bending & attributing words not mine & all pure imagination. You're the perfect epitome of a Evolutionist. Somehow, some way, the Queenie Princesses of baboon butt bullshit have to have it their way
No matter how extremely Crocodilian - mouth with eyes on top, tail proportionate to the body = Croc., Reptile legs. But Oh No, it just can't be a Croc. "mommy. mommy, poo hoo hoo, I want it to be Shamu, mommy!
man if you knew shit why dont i see you on discovery or mdoern scientist magazine, you repeat the same shit, NOW FUCKING ANSWER ME, DID DINOS EXIST? fucking taking you long, or is it that you dont wanna get into that shit? that jsut shows that you are immune to criticism, now stfu and answer me doug.
What difference would it make if you see me anywhere you idiot. You're too stupid to realize that you've already seen the ID scientists and still, you were nothing but a Queenie little spoiled bitch. So it's not like it would make any difference no matter how many real scientists you'd see presenting real science. The lying bunch of faggots that spew 4 legged whales out of their radiantly brilliant baboon ass & that Roman Retard wearing fashionable Trap Ties present what constitutes science to U
"Queenie little spoiled bitch", im underprivileged, my family, is underprivileged, i have a single mom, and 3 brothers, 1 of which was an ex-gangster and dealer, GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU LITTLE SHIT. now stfu and stop spewing bullshit like that, im fuckin sick of it.. My education is public, i do my "privileged high social class" research on my own cause i wanna get somewhere. All you did in that comment, was say im an idiot, saying id scientists are reakl scientists, that whale bullshit again.
(NOW FUCKING ANSWER ME, DID DINOS EXIST? fucking taking you long)
Shut up you little princess queenie bitch. If you'd like I'll send you my address in a pm & you can get some more boot rash on your baboon ass. Or since you are the animal, how does your ass feel about .22 LR? Bitch!
You really are a deludedly dumb one, asking that stupid question considering "Tyrannosaurus Chicken" is all yours. You're the one that claims I'm only an echo of Dr. Hovind. What do you think I think of dinos?
DID I EVER SAY YOU ARE AN ECHO OF DR HOVIND??? just go fuck your self you know that, fuck you man, just stfu, internet arguments are stupid, i thought you would have the self-security to accept you are wrong in an online forum, but all youve done is dick about it, fuck you, just fuck off, im not gonna talk to you, im gonna block you, use that longrifle bullet to blow off your fucking head you prick.
Hyde, now you're assuming that I lack security as a result of you previously assuming that you've been correct & I've been wrong. It would be nice if you actually knew how to identify what is conclusively evidential. As well as what is merely theoretic & conjecture, which is what you always present while thinking it's conclusive evidence
Now you're going to turn the tables on me, getting all emotional, talking as if I am the one who is wrong. You did wrong! You started with your STFU commands
Jeckle, now that Mr. Hyde has subsided, you'd like to "talk". However, Mr. Hyde caused the communication breakdown by forgetting that he's on my video page & began commanding that I STFU. Not to mention, his command that I stop making videos. Apparently as Dr. Jeckle you decided that prohibiting video production is hardcore censorship. Thus, you instead applied softcore 1 star censorship. Considering the ratings of all my videos pertaining to evo is why I laugh at all the Evolutionist videos in
which they're crying to mommy about the rights violating censorship that's supposedly being done to them. I've never seen anything but 5 stars on all of Blunderf00l's video. But what is one to expect from a bunch of Queenie Princesses. There's no doubt about the censorship that goes on when you look through my evo videos. Yet, knowing that the Queenies will get their way, as always, I don't go around making sobbing little bitch videos about the "REAL" censorship. If they get away with EXPELLING
You remind me of Madonna.- "Sara Palin, you can't be in my concert. Get the F%&* out of my concert Sarah Palin"
The dumb tramp had to first manufacture the fiction of that Sarah Palin would even want to go to her concert. So that then she could pretend that Palin was there & then feel that she was kicking her out. Cheap thrills of the deluded
i dont know what you think of dinos, you never cover the subject (reluctance??????), so umm, answer me, or i will actually say that you are reluctant to cover the subject of the greatest archosaurs to rule the land!!!
I'm not like evolutionists who misinterpret fossils according to their predeterminations. The fossil record shows dinosaurs, therefor, dinosaurs existed.
However, Tyrannosaurus Chicken" is curiously missing from the fossil record. Must be some more of that frequently discovered, scientifically exclusively Evolutionist, evidential mountain of pure conjecture, I guess?
ok, when you said "Tyrannosaurus Chicken" is curiously missing from the fossil record", well, theres the next best thing. BEHOLD, THE PEDOPENNA, and they could verify it had feathers, becasue of the patters and basically the feather shapes in the fossils, as a matter of fact, most of the cretacious period theropods were feathered? wow god must of made them to have the same bone structure as birds, and have feathers, he is GREAT!! He even made a dino-bird, Archaeopteryx, WOW!!!
Ha Ha Ha, this is precisely why Evolution is "UNFALSIFIABLE"! It's because evolutionists never accept any facts, explanations or evidence that opposes evolutionary theory. While accepting everything in favor of Evolution no matter how ridiculously manufactured
The supposed feathers of non birds from the past, have been validly refuted.
"Archaeopteryx" - Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, what more can be said? You're still holding on to that one. Ha Ha Ha Ha
No..... a bunch of liars have destroyed whatever potential for intelligence you may have had by leading you into believing all of their ridiculous lies. As with the fossils which they fallaciously interpret.
You saw the artists renderings of fossils within this video. If you can ever grow a sack enough to face the facts, you will see how obviously ridiculous they are painted. That is "misinterpretation"!
lol, all you did was just say a bunch of stuff without evaluating on it, just look at it yourself. All you keep doing is saying taht we are deluded and stupid, but you never evaluate. It's the same crap over and over again with you, COME ON!!! PROVE YOUR STATEMENTS!!! and disprove mine.
you believe in the fossil record right? you must believe in evolution, noh? you can see transitions, ive referred you to the page before but youve never mentioned it. And if you're a christian, i'd like you to know that the majoriity of evolutionists are too. And if you beleve in a god, HOW THE FUCK DOES THAT COME IN THE WAY OF EVOLUTION.
Well, if you're waiting for paleontologists to uncover 'Tyrannosaurus Chicken' before you will take evolution seriously, you can rest assured that 'T-Rex Chicken' will NEVER be found. Your beliefs are safe.
man dont sidetrack, get to the fucking point, you never get to it man? you always repeat the same crap and drone on about it, and then you just drone on about "your claims about amoebian bla bla bla are delusions" man you cant just claim they are delusions to, you have to show up or shut up. Man, al you ever do, is use these big words and put them in a sentence, then you put small references. if you dont believe me, just look at yourself.
Since you're definitely a product of the oppressive tuition institutions of the highest priorities being "gender, race, social class & homosexuality", Oh, I forgot, "Communism" & "Mutational Morpholobotomy" also. It's why you're comprehensionally dyslexic. Better get your ass on some killer psychiatric, psycho makers
Comprehend this, Strawman maker! I said the "LEGS" of mammals. I spoke nothing of flippers since it's not I that has the delusions of that Crocodilians became whales. Yours is BS!
"Sumerian Simianite" "manipulated, ignorantly proud, baboon ass" "priceless renaissance statues " "Romanite Catholelicker" "Morphological" "Simianite" "Primateological", and look how many times you repeat "MORPHOLOGICALLY MUTATED AMOEBIAN FOREBEARERS WHO BECAME PRIMATEOLOGICAL HUMANOIDS IS A DELUSION",
Ok, simply put, it is claimed that the legs of some mammal evolved into the flappers of a whale, now if you look at a whale, its flappers are at its side, or at least not directly under, meaning tat if it did come from a leg, the leg must of a: evolved into a fin while under the body (very un-aqua-dynamic), or b: been at the sides before it evolved, (which would of allowed them to swim even without fins better than underbody fins. So, umm? gonna answer my question.
also, did you use the word homosexuality, as in (TYPE OF) gender, race, social class, HOMOSEXUALITY? i think you should of used the word sexuality. AND DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT "comprehensionally dyslexic" MEANS, LOL, VERY BAD GRAMMAR!! i am gonna repost back at you, all of the times you have used "ameobian forebearers, delusion, primateological" or the like, in the same comment, without evaluating, right now.
"they're claiming to have ancestral Amoebian forebearers & say they're full status apes that descended from non ape""Although that's mere delusion, you are nevertheless more defective than simply from that delusion" "This is undeniably evident from the fact that you believe yourself to have ancestral Amoebian forebearers and that you evoists believe the defects that are mutants, to be the ones capable of surviving while the non defective all perish" approx 460 letters of the same shit.
I want you to understand chui, that being disproven, or wrong, is to be celebrated, IT IS NOT FAILURE, IT IS PROGRESS, NOW YOU SEE THAT YOU ARE WRONG, PUT IT BEHIND YOU, DONT HIDE THAT YOU CANT SAY ANYTHING BACK, ACCEPT AND SAY "MAN, NOW I HAVE LEARNT, AND AM SMARTER!!!" i want you to know that.
noone will laugh if youre wrong man, noone, well they may feel irony and amusement at this, but they wint say "HAHAHAHAHAHA!!" they will say "GODDAMNIT, FINALLY, YOU SEE!! CONGRATULATIONS!!!"now answer my dino question you have ignored the bloody topic.
and man, you also, never make sense, "SUMERIAN???", what the fuck man, is it just me or did you just use that cause it's big and starts with an S? "Communism" & "Mutational Morpholobotomy" this has nothing to do with politics man. "Better get your ass on some killer psychiatric, psycho makers", WTF R U TALKING ABOUT, psychiatric refers to mental health, psycho, a lunatic, they both start with psy? and talk about brains? YAY BIG WORDS!!!! lets use em in a sentence!!!
This video hat you are referring to doesnt educate well, i will refer you to the following creatures, in order! Pakicetus, Ambulocetus, Kutchicetus, Artiocetus, Dorudon, Aetiocetus, Basilosaurus, Eurhinodelphis, Mammalodon, now search those up, and you can clearly see transition. And i wonder if you have even gotten on the topic of the other referred transitional fossils.
but chui, i wanna ask something, if you think nothing evolved, do you think that the dinosaurs and all that never lived, or that they were alive? Now answer, yes, or no?
DO YOU EVEN HAVE ANY WUALIFICATIONS THAT ALLOW YOU TO MAKE THESE CLAIMS. Also, regardless of form, you can actually see a transition if you look up the list of transitional fossils, BYE BYE!!
Wow spiccoli, way to bring a strong case against evolution. Science and learning clearly aren't for you. I understand why evolution is too scary for you, as basic cognitive skills are required. Making fun of their names? Childsplay.
Since this was so weak, consider making a case for creationism. Oh wait, you can't. Are making videos like this all that's left after failing Kent Hovind's school for creatards?
Where do I apply for one of these jobs? I can make stuff up that nobody's ever seen before, like the tooth spacing on those supposedly mammalian skulls.
Seriously, these fabricated animals should have been evolutionary success stories and we should see something similar to them today in addition to the whales they supposedly became. They were warm-blooded and shaped like crocs, and crocs (despite being cold-blooded like dinos) are still around.
Hey Wizard, good to hear from you, it's been a while.Yea, I just can't help but to have a bit of a problem with 4 legged whales & Crocodilian Mammals. I think soon they'll announce that Chupacabras is actually a "Missing Lynx"
Hey what a coincidence u should post a note today, considering we became acquainted over the 2nd amendment issue. Just yesterday I sold my 12 ga. to an old work buddy. It's funny, he's got 2 little boys, not very big but they're powder & lead happy & reel in the big fish2
Got the email you'd posted more video. I just did 5 myself of a trip last weekend with my kids to a place I hung out when I was their age (20's) with my friends.
Gotta love the debate. I believe in both! Though I think the 'creation' story is a very simplistic explanation of a complicated thing for very simple minded people 5-6000 years ago. Ya can't explain quantum physics to an idiot!
Tell him to teach those kids well and they'll never have that 'forbidden fruit' syndrome!
Sorry Wizard, I don't know if you marked your own comment as spam but I was able to unspam it & see it. You understand, you have provided a view of which its reply is to me something interesting to talk about. No friction, we'll just converse. You perception of the minds of the ancient world is distorted. Don't allow technology to throw you off. These are matters of which tech. is irrelevant & the ancient world often excelled in. Including the Hebrews of which their learned intellect was
Needed to fix a phrasing error. Actually, the whole debate is pointless. The 'how' we're here has no bearing, to me anyway. If one really 'needs' to know, take your pick. The Biblical version of creation is too simple, like a children's story, with too many open questions for me. Evolution is a long, well, though out process, which seems to me would be more fulfilling to the architect. I get more satisfaction from designing/building something than buying it or 'snapping' my fingers.
Part 2- To satisfy my own 'need' to know, I put the Adam and Eve story in the context of a tribe of 'cave people'. Explains things like where'd Cain and Able's (and Seth's) wives come from! I agree, the ancients were capable of understanding more than we may give them credit for, though I believe they were more tuned in to what they could see, touch and rationalize in the moment, than grasping what happened over millions of years of time. Still, the written record is just a simple explanation.
remarkable even by todays standards. It's neither a recent development, nor a coincidence that there exists within Israel the cause which is responsible for the many astounding scientific advancements. It's been many years in the making. Just to give you a minor tid bit, they sell flowers to the Nederlands. Ha Ha, how'd that happen? Consider this, nearly all secularists feel that the account of that man was created from a handful of dirt, is ridiculous. Correctly so, I agree. We identify its
ridiculousness because we're aware of the limitations of both mans power and everything within the natural universe. There are natural laws which disallow such occurrences. It's ridiculous because we know of nothing within our natural world which can do such a thing. Evo makes the exact same claim - inorganic matter (dirt) spontaneously generating into life (man) Yet, evoists attribute "naturalistic causes" with the power to have done it. Naturalistic abilities are why we identified the
ridiculous. Its not even necessary to conduct scientific testing. Evo already loses at the conceptual level. Yet, at the conceptual level, the only thing that can remove the ridiculous factor, is attributing the "supernatural". Something beyond the nature of our universe. Such as its Maker
ultimately, its supernaturalists, not materialists whom peddle & provide the highest political support for Evo. NWO are at the top, Loserferians - Evo is Sumerian - ther garnering support against +
we can conduct scientific experiments to see whether evolution is true, we can also observe it naturaally, and there is no need for a supernatural being in evolution. If you attempt to use the knowledge found in this universe and the way it works to prove the existence of something which defies all laws of this universe, you are the only one who loses at the conceptual level. Lol, materialists dont provide the highest political support for evo, most of them are christians, same with evo-believer
Certainly {we can conduct scientific experiments to see whether evolution is true} OR NOT. You conveniently & wishfully left out the proper conclusion. Actually, it was neither convenience nor wishful, but simply your predetermination that evo must be true. You know, because you hate the alternative too much. You really should get in tune with your hatred which you believe is completely non existent within you. You'd be surprised what it will lead you to discover
one thing funny, you creationists always accuse opponents of just making fun of you, and i point out "AK47AhmadineJAB", now seriously are you a little boy?
(one thing funny, you creationists always accuse opponents of just making fun of you)
I've never said that to you since there isn't anything to make fun of. Which explains where Evoists arrogant delusions come from as they're asking "why do people laugh at creationists", they're claiming to have ancestral Amoebian forebearers & say they're full status apes that descended from non ape, "ape-like" creatures??? Now there's something to ridicule. Thats why I don't cry about it I'm just better at it
"I've never said that to you since there isn't anything to make fun of" never said you did, i referred to creationists, including you, but if i said, "its funny that muslims say that allah isnt the same god as yahweh" you would know what i mean right? "they're claiming to have ancestral Amoebian forebearers & say they're full status apes that descended from non ape, "ape-like" creatures??? Now there's something to ridicule.
Thats why I don't cry about it I'm just better at it", lol, if you actually gave it a look, you would see that, WE CLAIM TO HAVE ASCENDED FROM APES, WHO ASCENDED FROM NON-APES ETC. It seems like you have never even read the claims of evoists, one thing to note, the majority of evolution believers in the world, are christian, they are deluded amirite? Answer my dino question!
Of course, if that hatred truly was non existent within you, then there also wouldn't exist your predetermination of God's non existence. Those 2 non existences rarely cohabitate within any 1 person. As for scientific experiments conducted, you're correct, they can be conducted. They usually result in things like lab induced mutations within the fast forwarded lives of fruit flies. But they've merely proved what knowledgeable people had already stated. That defects such as mutants can hardly be
expected to survive under any conditions. Much less when even the non defective are not surviving. Speaking of defective, I often wonder what goes through the minds of evolutionists when it is seen yet again, that not even the most intelligent intelligences can cause what they believe non intelligence does cause? Interesting concept is, "Extra Intelligence Imbecilic Hyper Proficiency", don't you think? There's only one minor detail that majorly upsets its possible validity. That people such as
Umm, evolution is so unpredictable, that no intelligent mind could be behind the process, "extra intelligence-imbecilic(an oxymoron) hyper proficiency(a contradiction of imbecilic)," you refer to the concept as "smart stupid extreme proficiency" lol, as in, a conscious mind requires a high intelligence, and a low one, and to be very productive, behind evolution, if you said "conscious intervention lacking change of design for better environmental suiting", then you wouldnt look stupid.
you & other evolutionists aren't exhibiting any of the required "Hyper Proficiency". It was certainly a very noble "support the underdog" type of gesture. However, it looks as though "imbecilic" will have to remain in the "exceedingly deficient" category. What a shame, after all of the billions of successively accumulative, mutationally defective stages that you guys & your forebearing Amoebian ancestors have been through. Not to mention your current defectively mutated state of existence
{we can also observe it naturally, and there is no need for a supernatural being}
That is simply such excessively logical reasoning. Observing evolution naturally, creates only the need to observe it unnaturally. As when observed in the lab experiments you alluded to. You're just so mutationally mentally magnificent. Perhaps I should give defectiveness a try?
{materialists dont provide the highest political support for evo}
The first correct thing you've said. Supernaturalist Loserferians do!
We have observed it both unaturally and naturally, you have admitted to this. Supernaturalist loserferians don't do shit all in the fuckin politics, neiter do materialist, if you think that it is fucked up that we teach evolution in your country blame the 90% christian board of education that support it, ohh unless they are all luciferian supernaturalists who believe in a natural process to explain the current state of life. I totally give up with you, just fuk off, and s,
Well that certainly makes 100% pure sense for you to say that the 90% of the board of education that support evolution are Christians. I take it that the other 10% who reject evolution are the non religious.
Absolutely astounding! Now that you have enlightened us all with the realization of that evolution is actually a Biblical, Christian, sacred doctrine, perhaps we should get started on informing all of the vast majority of Christians that aren't aware of their religion's evo teachings?
"you think that it is fucked up that we teach evolution in your country blame the 90% christian board of education that support it" meaning, the board of education, which supports the teaching of evolution, is 90% christian, you nitwit. You should go back to primary school, and do a class in reading, for you cannot understand literature. Which is also why you don't make sense alot, and why you think you are very intelligent, now, give up.
Is this video a joke? That's not a crocadillian at all! One of the thousands of dead givaways is the zygomatic arch and the dentary. I knew creationists have difficulty with attention to detail and professionalism, but what the hell is this horse crap?!
flyboy5842 9 months ago
Excellent video...keep up the good work, It's always hilarious watching evo's prop up their false religion with false interpretations of the evidence.
ozredneck22 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Kutchicetus you show in the video is not a crocodilian, as you claim, it is a mammal. That is demonstrated by a number of anatomical features, including the structure in the lower jaw.
WildwoodClaire1 10 months ago
The Kutchicetus you show in the video is not a crocodilian, as you claim, iti s mammal. That is demontstrated by a number of anatomical features, including the structure in the lower jaw.
WildwoodClaire1 10 months ago
Mammals like the mammal fossil shown here have dentary-squamosal jaw joints. Where reptiles and quadrate-articular. Those skulls were mammalian not crocodilian.
snakeguy76 1 year ago 4
Man, you think Kutchicetus is a crocodile...
I love how creationists see that an animal looks vaguely like something and then jump to a radical conclusion. Like how they said that Pakicetus looks like a dog. It's laughable, if pakicetus looks like a dog, so do cows, cats, goats, lions...
Piatnitskysaurus 1 year ago 3
I can see you came to the debate with an open mind. There's nothing like telling someone they're a liar when they comment on something you don't like. Having said that you seem to revel in a kind of deliberate misinformation which I find particularly crass and unworthy of anyone who wishes to be taken seriously. Your iterative jokes are quite crude and your dismissal of that which you clearly don't understand is laughable. Then the dreary tautology from your comment cap it all. How sad.
Drweavil 2 years ago
@Drweavil,
{I can see you came to the debate with an open mind}
Exactly! That's why I can see the huge differences between the fossil's actual forms & the ridiculously altered artist's renderings. Something a close minded predetermining Evoist like yourself apparently can't see
{There's nothing like telling someone they're a liar when they comment on something you don't like}
If anyone comments on something I don't like, then I won't see it. Being that I don't view videos with a subject matter
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
I guess I should have expected such a poor response but 5 of them ? whoa that's a lot. I wonder what you say to those who dare to disagree with your precious opinions to your face? Still, no matter, I can see it's a complete waste of time to continue to speak with you. I'll leave you to be ignored and to your love of hating something that will continue to inspire millions of minds immeasurably superior to yours i.e: open ones.
Drweavil 2 years ago
Thata girl... way to explain the fact that when you actually present explanations that support your assertions it can't be done with simply 500 lousy characters. Particularly with something like "science", the under 500 character, unsupported, mere assertions are for the other, "dummy" guys, aren't they DrDrivel?
Yea, those "poor responders" really are audaciously hypocritical, aren't they DrFrivol?
"Disagree with me to my face"? Thats right... "still, no matter", since those ignorant
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
religotards won't actually directly address any presented arguments, neither to your face nor from their distant, cozy computer, dunce corner
Why waste one's precious time that's needed for thoroughly short, caption posts by responding to long winded, diatribes of deficiency
Yea, that's right... leave it to those logically laggard lovers of hate to greatly treasure hate simply to love it
Not to mention the fact that it is indeed the intelligent man that will ignore those who ridiculously
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
respond from exactly the same position which they held when you first ignored them by initially commenting on their video
Provoking more of their unexpected, already known view simply to ignore it is the only correct, Evo intelligent way to deal with such people
Thus is why it's impossible to measure the superiority of the millions of minds that oppose mine & that recognize that empiricism is for inspiration. Much like that other purely objective thing called "art" is also inspiring
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
that I don't like.
{Having said that you seem to revel in a kind of deliberate misinformation}
Not quite "revel". I much more tend to "repel" things like Piltdown, Nebraska, Java, Neanderthal, "Lucy And Some Guy With Grinders", Ida needa get real, drawn embryos, Chinese Dino-Bird, Tyrannosaurus Chicken etc. etc. etc.
{I find particularly crass and unworthy of anyone who wishes to be taken seriously}
Personally, I find crass, deliberate disinformation to be extremely worthy of the reveling
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
liars who wished to be taken seriously when they postulated the above mentioned list of fallaciously foul frauds
{Your iterative jokes are quite crude}
I've noticed evolutionists to not at all even attempt to be humorous. Comical is a characteristic that's incompatible with the continual worrisome weariness derived from the possibility of being discovered to be a bunch of shystering hoaxsters with a stupendously shitty spiel of ancestral amoebian forebearers
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
{dismissal of that which you clearly don't understand is laughable}
Your comments emanate with the seriousness of a loons lamentation rather than with laughter. But that's simply due to my effectively dismissing refutations of ridiculously whale sized fish tales. Refutations which you completely fail to directly address, due to the dismissive nature of your weak argument
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
{Then the dreary tautology}
Coming from an Evolutionist... now that's laughable!
If Thesauruses were completely accurate, they'd show "evolution" to be synonymous with "tautology"
Here's an entry;
"the individuals of a population that are the most fit (identified as those having the most offspring) will have the most offspring"
Grow a pair... face the truth!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
HAHA!! Great video. You have me laughing my.....uh..area of my body that used to have a tail before it "evolved away"(do they still go with that one?)...Off.
jgong8638 2 years ago
Thank you jgong, I appreciate it. The evolution/creation scene around YouTube is so heavily infested with the overwhelming majority of poor, censored, princess primates that one like yours is a rare but well enjoyed comment
Of course, with the waves from the Ork population being automatic 1 star voters, it's being made certain that all is well at YouTube with censorship suppressed into non existence... much like whale transitionals only not nearly as non existent
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
If you don't know the difference between mammal and crocodylian you might just be a creationist. XD
DerivedApe 2 years ago 12
If you can't see that the headless animals, having simply a huge mouth with jagged teeth and two eyeballs on top are Crocodilian, then you definitely are an Evolutionist
I can't think of any 4 legged Mammal that doesn't have its legs directly underneath it's body, supporting it's weight. Those elongated bodied fossils with seeing jaws in place of heads, have legs going out horizontally from the sides of their bodies before the legs bend downward, vertically at the elbow. Just like reptiles do
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
*If you can't see that the headless animals, having simply a huge mouth with jagged teeth and two eyeballs on top are Crocodilian, then you definitely are an Evolutionist
Based on that you would probably classify Orca as crocodilian. XD
I think you seriously need to take a look at crocodilian skull and then take a second look at Pakicetid and Protocetid skulls.
here's a helpful hint. Crocodilians do not have double rooted teeth, neither do they have mandible made from single bone.
DerivedApe 2 years ago
Apparently not anymore they don't. But as you can see with Chihuahuas & Great Danes, "variation" can be quite ranged. However, do you care to comment about the legs thing. The fact that 4 legged mammals have their legs directly underneath their body is something that's long been noted as a distinctive feature that identifies mammals from the rest
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Are you seriously claiming that crocodiles are mammals?
That you actually can't tell the difference?
Why is it that creationists insist on sharing your arrogance and ignorance together in such a detestable cocktail and yet still believe they are advocating truth?
ProcInc 2 years ago
Where did this Morphological Magpie come from? Heckle, where did you leave Jeckle? How in all of the Simianite's ape-wannabe, bubble world did you ever conclude that I'm the 1 claiming that Crocodilians are mammals? I'm the one pointing out that it's your Primateological PhD pals that are claiming Crocodilians are Mammals. Yea, thats what I'm asking, you bunch of morpholobotomized mutards actually can't tell the difference?
You must be a Romanite Catholelicker. Arrogant & ignorant like no other
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Your Sumerian Simianite, fish hat poppa would be proud of your easily manipulated, ignorantly proud, baboon ass. Just don't let him take your little baboon butt boy's ass out for one of those Romanite special, "Detestable Cocktails". Simply because no matter how many priceless renaissance statues & paintings he owns, still, he holds out the broke basket in the ghetto. That means he'll claim to have enough for only 1 cocktail & will split it with you. You get the cock, while he gets the tail
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Sheep says, 'But just look at it! It doesn't look like a whale. I mean....just....look! Are you going to believe the experts in the field that spend their lives attempting to connect all living things on earth, or are you going to believe me because I think these drawings look funny? Think for YOURSELVES and listen to ME, not the experts!'
grits011 2 years ago
i couldnt agree more, because i say it, and i have an opinion, then you MUST BELIEVE ME, that is correct.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
i am going to post a personal message by chuichupachichi:
Sorry A15, I accidentally clicked the "remove" link instead of the "reply". I don't want you or anyone to think that I "sensor" anybody's opinions on any of my videos.
Therefor, here is a "paste" of your comment that I "copied" from my G-Mail YouTube alert service. You might want to paste & copy it back on the video page of - "Evolutions Transitionals Don't Exist"
"You sound like you're using the existence of muta
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
tions and genetic change, good you used scientific knowledge to explain something, bad you used it as an explanation as to why one could believe in that knowledge, a direct contradiction, which renders your statement useless, but you were joking (i hope), and ill forgive you for that."
Besides, if I eliminated them, then I wouldn't get to have the fun in replying to them. For when one is engaged in a conflict or debate, you'd be surprised at how extremely advantageous it is to actually have "t.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
ruth" on one's side.
Of course, some would feel disgusted from my having stated this. Since delusion effectively creates the illusion which mimics the effects of the "advantageous" position.
ME-You understand that by what youre saying, you are proposing the danger that you may be delusioned, and that is why you believe that you have the upper hand, you are too delusioned to even consider this possibility. Which is why you are like "YOU ARE A MUTATIONALLY DEFECTED IDIOT", amirite?
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Firstly, you omitted part of my phrase - "When engaged in a debate, you'd be surprised to find out how extremely advantageous it is to actually have truth on your side"
Secondly, No! Only you in your delusion, understood it that way. This is undeniably evident from the fact that you believe yourself to have ancestral Amoebian forebearers and that you evoists believe the defects that are mutants, to be the ones capable of surviving while the non defective all perish. Also, it is you that
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"hen one is engaged in a conflict or debate, you'd be surprised at how extremely advantageous it is to actuallly have "truth" on one's side.", has not been ommited
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
believes that you are an accumulation of billions of mutations. Although that's mere delusion, you are nevertheless more defective than simply from that delusion. You are additionally defective from the cause of your belief of being a mutational accumulation while simultaneously accusing me of being the "MUTATIONALLY DEFECTED IDIOT" that you indeed are...... minus the mutation.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
you can't read, you need to learn to comprehend literature what i said was "hich is why you are like "YOU ARE A MUTATIONALLY DEFECTED IDIOT", amirite?", which means, i am saying that you are the one who is calling me the matationally defected idiot, you cannot read, go back to elementary and take a reading class. What you said proves nothing, all you are doing, is saying, that i believe in a delusion, what i say is a delusion. If you think it is a delusion, i will explain evolution to you now.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Natural selection, the process which allow evolution to happen, works like this. In every single successive generation of animals, as in, the offspring of the initial population, will have several genetic differences, some may have genes which make them taller than their parents' genes allowed, some darker, etc., however these changes are almost unnoticeable. But if a specimen with genes which allow him to reproduce more can have offspring, it may spread it's genes, which over time may be (cont.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
cont.) exaggerated, and they may spread these genes, so, the gene pool with the best suited genes, though this may take up to 300 yrs to be evident within that gene pool, will survive and produce more. Now what about the ones that may not be able to reproduce, yes, once the genes have been exaggerated in their pool, they may be cancelled out, or die, due to failure to survive or spread their genes, as this process goes on and on, the population begins to change over time. If you want a goo(cont.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
cont.)d example of this, search pepper moth evolution, specifically, the Wikipedia article. Now evolution works best when there are things to work with, so if a lizard population is in a very watery area, and requires fish as food, the ones best suited (body shape, arm length, hand shape) will survive, and reproduce more. Now, over time, populations may get separated, and they may adapt differently to their surroundings, using the same process. Now, we undergo, Speciation. Speciation, the(cont.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
cont.) process which allow macroevolution to undergo, works like this. If a population is split, and is turned into 2 separate populations, the ones with well suited genes can only spread this to their own populations, not to the other ones, so over time, they will change and be different, until that faithful moment, where their genes are too different to breed with the other population. Now, the process of micro-evolution is the same one as macro-evolution, natural-selection, but the proc(cont.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
cont.) which triggers the start of macro-evolution, is speciation. Now, because i have explained that, you will know that, overtime, the population will change in traits so much so, that if it were to meet with the initial population, they couldn't breed, which is another form of, MACROEVOLUTION, and the process is also a form of, SPECIATION. Now, overtime, they become, so different, that the changes are very evident, has this ever happened, HELL YEAH. just simply search up, list of transi(cont.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
cont.)tional fossils, specifically the wikipedia article, and you will see that we have a BEEEUTIFUL record of this. Has it happened in human existence, also, yes, search up, Apple Maggot Fly, and Gall Former Fly, and there is a yahoo questions post, called "Creationists, what do you think of these observed instances of speciation .(Macroevolution)?", search that up and look at the other examples, and search up the examples yourself.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
additional knowledge, YES IT IS POSSIBLE FOR ONE WITH DIFFERENT CHROMOSOME COUNT, DUE TO ADDITION OR FUSION OF THE CHROMOSOMES, TO REPRODUCE WIT ONE OF DIFFERENT CHROMOSOME COUNT, IF THE GENES ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO MATING, AS IN, SIMILAR ENOUGH. i AM GOING TO HAVE FUN MAKING MY VID ABOUT HOW THE FISH BECAME TETRAPODS, BYE BYE, AND FAREWELL.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
prove me wrong.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
i'm waiting for your reply chui
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
hurry up chuichupachichi, otherwise i will assume that you are hiding and now are in self conflict with your beliefs, so hurry up doofis.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
you couldn't have been silent for this long chui, hurry up now.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
What is "muta"? I don't know what that is but nevertheless, simply the fact that you posted this whole comment with its beginning announcement shows that you perceive it to be some kind of a exposition of some supposedly hidden foul play on my part.
Do you truly need to be that desperate? I know you can't win a legitimate debate but this is ridiculous. If I had intentionally removed your comment then why are all your other ones still here? I was hoping you'd re-post it because you had said the
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
stupidest thing ever within that comment. I was kicking myself when I accidentally removed it because I had already been licking my chops with the anticipation of tearing your brilliantly blistered baboon ass apart in replying to it.
Maybe next time you'll take my courtesy notice & behave correctly with it. You will receive negative reinforcement from me for your ape fecal flinging
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
is Chuichupachichi a satirist/troll, omg this guy is fuckin hilarious if he really thinks he makes sense then that is even more hilarious.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
You're suggesting that this skeleton with the clearly mammalian jaw and ribcage is crocodilian? Alliteration is a poor substitute for actual knowledge.
skevoid 2 years ago 3
"Poor substitute"? Its even worse when one whom like you, has neither alliteration nor knowledge. Next time gain the knowledge of exactly which of the several skeletons you're referring to. That way you can describe it to me through alliteration.
BTW, if you can somehow, mutationally accumulate enough intelligence. Perhaps, by way of selection magic or something. Please don't make it so boring next time. Try some stylish alliteration. At least make your pseudo-science lies interesting to read
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Ok, i want you to stfu, and stop making videos, because, the only one who is embaressing themselves, IS YOU. You never make sense, all you do is use smart words, and he was referring to the skeletons you said were crocodillian, you never got a good score in literature did you, otherwise you would have enough intelligence to analyze the sentence and see what he was referring to. The only pseudo-science, is yours.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Mr. Potato Head.....Moron
There are several skeletons in the video. "skevoid" said "THIS" skeleton with the clearly mammalian jaw". The Evoist video claims that "ALL" the skeletons in the video are Mammalian. Thus, they would have to all have Mammalian jaws
However, if instead of mindlessly flapping your jaw, you would STFU for once in your life & actually listen to reason & true correctness. Then you might not end up looking so stupid like one who believes he has ancestral Amoebian forebearers
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
actually moron, they have "two measures of teeth" so they can chew food, which verifies that it is from a mammal, it also does not ahve a crocodillian bodytype, the thickness and density of the bones can verify this, notice that it has a large hip pelvis, whereas a crocodilian pelvis is under it's ribs and tail, and very small, and has receding ribs, a MAMMAL TRAIT. The jaws are mamallian, as i pointed out too, if you see a crocodile skull, you see it;s lower jaw is up near it's eyesocket.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
There's nothing wrong with stating your case when it's something within reason. Therefor, even if you're wrong it may be that your simply mistaken regarding a matter difficult to discern. But this is downright ridiculous & clearly indicates the degree to which you bunch of pathetic primate wannabe's will lie to yourselves, simply to keep your impossible nightmare on artificial life support
Go to 1:28 & take a good look at his teeth. Notice the animal doesn't have a head. It merely has a neck &
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
attached to it is an extremely large mouth with eyeballs on top, "Croc". You can fool yourself all you like but that mouth & those teeth wouldn't chew even a 10 lb. wad of Wrigley's. It's clearly Crocodilian. Look at 1:33 - Mammals usually have their legs straight down underneath their body, directly supporting their weight. Reptiles, as with these particular examples, have their legs out to the sides without direct support underneath their body
"Qualifications"? I suppose yours aren't claims?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
yes, so are you claiming a whale is not a mammal, as its fins dont go down, this is clearly an evolved trait, mine aren't claims, mine are references to qualified scientist research. Bye Bye, and eyeballs on top? Its more in the form of a legged dolphin rather than a crocodile, simply search up dolphin skull and you can see a relation, not a direct one but one that indicates a possible relation, also, as you claim they aren't whales, THEY ACTUALLY ARE WHALES, proto-whales.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Man, you truly are one helluva grade A Jackass, aren't you? The way you argue, twisting & bending & attributing words not mine & all pure imagination. You're the perfect epitome of a Evolutionist. Somehow, some way, the Queenie Princesses of baboon butt bullshit have to have it their way
No matter how extremely Crocodilian - mouth with eyes on top, tail proportionate to the body = Croc., Reptile legs. But Oh No, it just can't be a Croc. "mommy. mommy, poo hoo hoo, I want it to be Shamu, mommy!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
man if you knew shit why dont i see you on discovery or mdoern scientist magazine, you repeat the same shit, NOW FUCKING ANSWER ME, DID DINOS EXIST? fucking taking you long, or is it that you dont wanna get into that shit? that jsut shows that you are immune to criticism, now stfu and answer me doug.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
What difference would it make if you see me anywhere you idiot. You're too stupid to realize that you've already seen the ID scientists and still, you were nothing but a Queenie little spoiled bitch. So it's not like it would make any difference no matter how many real scientists you'd see presenting real science. The lying bunch of faggots that spew 4 legged whales out of their radiantly brilliant baboon ass & that Roman Retard wearing fashionable Trap Ties present what constitutes science to U
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"Queenie little spoiled bitch", im underprivileged, my family, is underprivileged, i have a single mom, and 3 brothers, 1 of which was an ex-gangster and dealer, GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU LITTLE SHIT. now stfu and stop spewing bullshit like that, im fuckin sick of it.. My education is public, i do my "privileged high social class" research on my own cause i wanna get somewhere. All you did in that comment, was say im an idiot, saying id scientists are reakl scientists, that whale bullshit again.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
(NOW FUCKING ANSWER ME, DID DINOS EXIST? fucking taking you long)
Shut up you little princess queenie bitch. If you'd like I'll send you my address in a pm & you can get some more boot rash on your baboon ass. Or since you are the animal, how does your ass feel about .22 LR? Bitch!
You really are a deludedly dumb one, asking that stupid question considering "Tyrannosaurus Chicken" is all yours. You're the one that claims I'm only an echo of Dr. Hovind. What do you think I think of dinos?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
DID I EVER SAY YOU ARE AN ECHO OF DR HOVIND??? just go fuck your self you know that, fuck you man, just stfu, internet arguments are stupid, i thought you would have the self-security to accept you are wrong in an online forum, but all youve done is dick about it, fuck you, just fuck off, im not gonna talk to you, im gonna block you, use that longrifle bullet to blow off your fucking head you prick.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Hyde, now you're assuming that I lack security as a result of you previously assuming that you've been correct & I've been wrong. It would be nice if you actually knew how to identify what is conclusively evidential. As well as what is merely theoretic & conjecture, which is what you always present while thinking it's conclusive evidence
Now you're going to turn the tables on me, getting all emotional, talking as if I am the one who is wrong. You did wrong! You started with your STFU commands
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
i unblocked you, because you are fun. I hope you didnt put that longrifle in your head, so we can talk more.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Jeckle, now that Mr. Hyde has subsided, you'd like to "talk". However, Mr. Hyde caused the communication breakdown by forgetting that he's on my video page & began commanding that I STFU. Not to mention, his command that I stop making videos. Apparently as Dr. Jeckle you decided that prohibiting video production is hardcore censorship. Thus, you instead applied softcore 1 star censorship. Considering the ratings of all my videos pertaining to evo is why I laugh at all the Evolutionist videos in
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
which they're crying to mommy about the rights violating censorship that's supposedly being done to them. I've never seen anything but 5 stars on all of Blunderf00l's video. But what is one to expect from a bunch of Queenie Princesses. There's no doubt about the censorship that goes on when you look through my evo videos. Yet, knowing that the Queenies will get their way, as always, I don't go around making sobbing little bitch videos about the "REAL" censorship. If they get away with EXPELLING
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
You truly are a deluded one, aren't you? You blocked me then you unblocked me?
From my own video's comment page?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
no, i just did that cause i thought there was no hope for you.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
You remind me of Madonna.- "Sara Palin, you can't be in my concert. Get the F%&* out of my concert Sarah Palin"
The dumb tramp had to first manufacture the fiction of that Sarah Palin would even want to go to her concert. So that then she could pretend that Palin was there & then feel that she was kicking her out. Cheap thrills of the deluded
How did it make you feel? good?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
i dont know what you think of dinos, you never cover the subject (reluctance??????), so umm, answer me, or i will actually say that you are reluctant to cover the subject of the greatest archosaurs to rule the land!!!
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
I'm not like evolutionists who misinterpret fossils according to their predeterminations. The fossil record shows dinosaurs, therefor, dinosaurs existed.
However, Tyrannosaurus Chicken" is curiously missing from the fossil record. Must be some more of that frequently discovered, scientifically exclusively Evolutionist, evidential mountain of pure conjecture, I guess?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
ok, when you said "Tyrannosaurus Chicken" is curiously missing from the fossil record", well, theres the next best thing. BEHOLD, THE PEDOPENNA, and they could verify it had feathers, becasue of the patters and basically the feather shapes in the fossils, as a matter of fact, most of the cretacious period theropods were feathered? wow god must of made them to have the same bone structure as birds, and have feathers, he is GREAT!! He even made a dino-bird, Archaeopteryx, WOW!!!
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Ha Ha Ha, this is precisely why Evolution is "UNFALSIFIABLE"! It's because evolutionists never accept any facts, explanations or evidence that opposes evolutionary theory. While accepting everything in favor of Evolution no matter how ridiculously manufactured
The supposed feathers of non birds from the past, have been validly refuted.
"Archaeopteryx" - Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, what more can be said? You're still holding on to that one. Ha Ha Ha Ha
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
man a lizard must of fucked with an otter to make this one heh? Procynosuchus. Thrinaxodon too heh?, man, just look at the records, dumbass.!!!
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
No..... a bunch of liars have destroyed whatever potential for intelligence you may have had by leading you into believing all of their ridiculous lies. As with the fossils which they fallaciously interpret.
You saw the artists renderings of fossils within this video. If you can ever grow a sack enough to face the facts, you will see how obviously ridiculous they are painted. That is "misinterpretation"!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
lol, all you did was just say a bunch of stuff without evaluating on it, just look at it yourself. All you keep doing is saying taht we are deluded and stupid, but you never evaluate. It's the same crap over and over again with you, COME ON!!! PROVE YOUR STATEMENTS!!! and disprove mine.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
so yeah, i guess tat god just amde these animals to look twin breed eyy?
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
you believe in the fossil record right? you must believe in evolution, noh? you can see transitions, ive referred you to the page before but youve never mentioned it. And if you're a christian, i'd like you to know that the majoriity of evolutionists are too. And if you beleve in a god, HOW THE FUCK DOES THAT COME IN THE WAY OF EVOLUTION.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Well, if you're waiting for paleontologists to uncover 'Tyrannosaurus Chicken' before you will take evolution seriously, you can rest assured that 'T-Rex Chicken' will NEVER be found. Your beliefs are safe.
grits011 2 years ago
man dont sidetrack, get to the fucking point, you never get to it man? you always repeat the same crap and drone on about it, and then you just drone on about "your claims about amoebian bla bla bla are delusions" man you cant just claim they are delusions to, you have to show up or shut up. Man, al you ever do, is use these big words and put them in a sentence, then you put small references. if you dont believe me, just look at yourself.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Since you're definitely a product of the oppressive tuition institutions of the highest priorities being "gender, race, social class & homosexuality", Oh, I forgot, "Communism" & "Mutational Morpholobotomy" also. It's why you're comprehensionally dyslexic. Better get your ass on some killer psychiatric, psycho makers
Comprehend this, Strawman maker! I said the "LEGS" of mammals. I spoke nothing of flippers since it's not I that has the delusions of that Crocodilians became whales. Yours is BS!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"Sumerian Simianite" "manipulated, ignorantly proud, baboon ass" "priceless renaissance statues " "Romanite Catholelicker" "Morphological" "Simianite" "Primateological", and look how many times you repeat "MORPHOLOGICALLY MUTATED AMOEBIAN FOREBEARERS WHO BECAME PRIMATEOLOGICAL HUMANOIDS IS A DELUSION",
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Ok, simply put, it is claimed that the legs of some mammal evolved into the flappers of a whale, now if you look at a whale, its flappers are at its side, or at least not directly under, meaning tat if it did come from a leg, the leg must of a: evolved into a fin while under the body (very un-aqua-dynamic), or b: been at the sides before it evolved, (which would of allowed them to swim even without fins better than underbody fins. So, umm? gonna answer my question.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
also, did you use the word homosexuality, as in (TYPE OF) gender, race, social class, HOMOSEXUALITY? i think you should of used the word sexuality. AND DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT "comprehensionally dyslexic" MEANS, LOL, VERY BAD GRAMMAR!! i am gonna repost back at you, all of the times you have used "ameobian forebearers, delusion, primateological" or the like, in the same comment, without evaluating, right now.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
"they're claiming to have ancestral Amoebian forebearers & say they're full status apes that descended from non ape""Although that's mere delusion, you are nevertheless more defective than simply from that delusion" "This is undeniably evident from the fact that you believe yourself to have ancestral Amoebian forebearers and that you evoists believe the defects that are mutants, to be the ones capable of surviving while the non defective all perish" approx 460 letters of the same shit.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
I want you to understand chui, that being disproven, or wrong, is to be celebrated, IT IS NOT FAILURE, IT IS PROGRESS, NOW YOU SEE THAT YOU ARE WRONG, PUT IT BEHIND YOU, DONT HIDE THAT YOU CANT SAY ANYTHING BACK, ACCEPT AND SAY "MAN, NOW I HAVE LEARNT, AND AM SMARTER!!!" i want you to know that.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
noone will laugh if youre wrong man, noone, well they may feel irony and amusement at this, but they wint say "HAHAHAHAHAHA!!" they will say "GODDAMNIT, FINALLY, YOU SEE!! CONGRATULATIONS!!!"now answer my dino question you have ignored the bloody topic.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
and man, you also, never make sense, "SUMERIAN???", what the fuck man, is it just me or did you just use that cause it's big and starts with an S? "Communism" & "Mutational Morpholobotomy" this has nothing to do with politics man. "Better get your ass on some killer psychiatric, psycho makers", WTF R U TALKING ABOUT, psychiatric refers to mental health, psycho, a lunatic, they both start with psy? and talk about brains? YAY BIG WORDS!!!! lets use em in a sentence!!!
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
and i was reluctant up till now to rate you videos, but fuck it bucket man, im gonna rate em 1,
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
This video hat you are referring to doesnt educate well, i will refer you to the following creatures, in order! Pakicetus, Ambulocetus, Kutchicetus, Artiocetus, Dorudon, Aetiocetus, Basilosaurus, Eurhinodelphis, Mammalodon, now search those up, and you can clearly see transition. And i wonder if you have even gotten on the topic of the other referred transitional fossils.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
but chui, i wanna ask something, if you think nothing evolved, do you think that the dinosaurs and all that never lived, or that they were alive? Now answer, yes, or no?
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
DO YOU EVEN HAVE ANY WUALIFICATIONS THAT ALLOW YOU TO MAKE THESE CLAIMS. Also, regardless of form, you can actually see a transition if you look up the list of transitional fossils, BYE BYE!!
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
please tell me this is a Parody lol
Mexican602G 2 years ago 9
It'll be a parody when I wear a halloween costume of you with huaraches and a wide yellow stripe on the ground behind me.......... American style!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
lol, this one is sheer comedy bro, did you actually have a look at the skeletons of all the modern creatures you've mentioned here?
Because once you have your presentation looks quite quite the uninformed piece of speculative crap.
freedomsstain 2 years ago 3
Wow, a person who tries to disprove evolution by acting like an idiot in his description.
XXL2oo 2 years ago 12
Wow spiccoli, way to bring a strong case against evolution. Science and learning clearly aren't for you. I understand why evolution is too scary for you, as basic cognitive skills are required. Making fun of their names? Childsplay.
Since this was so weak, consider making a case for creationism. Oh wait, you can't. Are making videos like this all that's left after failing Kent Hovind's school for creatards?
madjik9 2 years ago 6
yes they do.
GabrielGrewal 2 years ago
Yes of course they do!
Simply because you say so.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Two thumbs up on the sound.
Where do I apply for one of these jobs? I can make stuff up that nobody's ever seen before, like the tooth spacing on those supposedly mammalian skulls.
Seriously, these fabricated animals should have been evolutionary success stories and we should see something similar to them today in addition to the whales they supposedly became. They were warm-blooded and shaped like crocs, and crocs (despite being cold-blooded like dinos) are still around.
angryoldfatman 2 years ago
Got the sound, good job.
Thebboss 2 years ago
Thanks Boss, appreciate that.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Greetings Chui...Trying to stir up more troubles between the creationists and the evolutionists, I see!
I hope that sound track isn't owned by WMG!! It's getting so you can't even post a video of you singing a song they own around here anymore!
awizardalso 2 years ago
Hey Wizard, good to hear from you, it's been a while.Yea, I just can't help but to have a bit of a problem with 4 legged whales & Crocodilian Mammals. I think soon they'll announce that Chupacabras is actually a "Missing Lynx"
Hey what a coincidence u should post a note today, considering we became acquainted over the 2nd amendment issue. Just yesterday I sold my 12 ga. to an old work buddy. It's funny, he's got 2 little boys, not very big but they're powder & lead happy & reel in the big fish2
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Comment removed
awizardalso 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Got the email you'd posted more video. I just did 5 myself of a trip last weekend with my kids to a place I hung out when I was their age (20's) with my friends.
Gotta love the debate. I believe in both! Though I think the 'creation' story is a very simplistic explanation of a complicated thing for very simple minded people 5-6000 years ago. Ya can't explain quantum physics to an idiot!
Tell him to teach those kids well and they'll never have that 'forbidden fruit' syndrome!
awizardalso 2 years ago
Sorry Wizard, I don't know if you marked your own comment as spam but I was able to unspam it & see it. You understand, you have provided a view of which its reply is to me something interesting to talk about. No friction, we'll just converse. You perception of the minds of the ancient world is distorted. Don't allow technology to throw you off. These are matters of which tech. is irrelevant & the ancient world often excelled in. Including the Hebrews of which their learned intellect was
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Needed to fix a phrasing error. Actually, the whole debate is pointless. The 'how' we're here has no bearing, to me anyway. If one really 'needs' to know, take your pick. The Biblical version of creation is too simple, like a children's story, with too many open questions for me. Evolution is a long, well, though out process, which seems to me would be more fulfilling to the architect. I get more satisfaction from designing/building something than buying it or 'snapping' my fingers.
awizardalso 2 years ago
Part 2- To satisfy my own 'need' to know, I put the Adam and Eve story in the context of a tribe of 'cave people'. Explains things like where'd Cain and Able's (and Seth's) wives come from! I agree, the ancients were capable of understanding more than we may give them credit for, though I believe they were more tuned in to what they could see, touch and rationalize in the moment, than grasping what happened over millions of years of time. Still, the written record is just a simple explanation.
awizardalso 2 years ago
remarkable even by todays standards. It's neither a recent development, nor a coincidence that there exists within Israel the cause which is responsible for the many astounding scientific advancements. It's been many years in the making. Just to give you a minor tid bit, they sell flowers to the Nederlands. Ha Ha, how'd that happen? Consider this, nearly all secularists feel that the account of that man was created from a handful of dirt, is ridiculous. Correctly so, I agree. We identify its
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
ridiculousness because we're aware of the limitations of both mans power and everything within the natural universe. There are natural laws which disallow such occurrences. It's ridiculous because we know of nothing within our natural world which can do such a thing. Evo makes the exact same claim - inorganic matter (dirt) spontaneously generating into life (man) Yet, evoists attribute "naturalistic causes" with the power to have done it. Naturalistic abilities are why we identified the
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
ridiculous. Its not even necessary to conduct scientific testing. Evo already loses at the conceptual level. Yet, at the conceptual level, the only thing that can remove the ridiculous factor, is attributing the "supernatural". Something beyond the nature of our universe. Such as its Maker
ultimately, its supernaturalists, not materialists whom peddle & provide the highest political support for Evo. NWO are at the top, Loserferians - Evo is Sumerian - ther garnering support against +
Ur pawns
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
we can conduct scientific experiments to see whether evolution is true, we can also observe it naturaally, and there is no need for a supernatural being in evolution. If you attempt to use the knowledge found in this universe and the way it works to prove the existence of something which defies all laws of this universe, you are the only one who loses at the conceptual level. Lol, materialists dont provide the highest political support for evo, most of them are christians, same with evo-believer
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
"AK47AhmadineJAB",
Certainly {we can conduct scientific experiments to see whether evolution is true} OR NOT. You conveniently & wishfully left out the proper conclusion. Actually, it was neither convenience nor wishful, but simply your predetermination that evo must be true. You know, because you hate the alternative too much. You really should get in tune with your hatred which you believe is completely non existent within you. You'd be surprised what it will lead you to discover
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
one thing funny, you creationists always accuse opponents of just making fun of you, and i point out "AK47AhmadineJAB", now seriously are you a little boy?
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
(one thing funny, you creationists always accuse opponents of just making fun of you)
I've never said that to you since there isn't anything to make fun of. Which explains where Evoists arrogant delusions come from as they're asking "why do people laugh at creationists", they're claiming to have ancestral Amoebian forebearers & say they're full status apes that descended from non ape, "ape-like" creatures??? Now there's something to ridicule. Thats why I don't cry about it I'm just better at it
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"I've never said that to you since there isn't anything to make fun of" never said you did, i referred to creationists, including you, but if i said, "its funny that muslims say that allah isnt the same god as yahweh" you would know what i mean right? "they're claiming to have ancestral Amoebian forebearers & say they're full status apes that descended from non ape, "ape-like" creatures??? Now there's something to ridicule.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Thats why I don't cry about it I'm just better at it", lol, if you actually gave it a look, you would see that, WE CLAIM TO HAVE ASCENDED FROM APES, WHO ASCENDED FROM NON-APES ETC. It seems like you have never even read the claims of evoists, one thing to note, the majority of evolution believers in the world, are christian, they are deluded amirite? Answer my dino question!
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Of course, if that hatred truly was non existent within you, then there also wouldn't exist your predetermination of God's non existence. Those 2 non existences rarely cohabitate within any 1 person. As for scientific experiments conducted, you're correct, they can be conducted. They usually result in things like lab induced mutations within the fast forwarded lives of fruit flies. But they've merely proved what knowledgeable people had already stated. That defects such as mutants can hardly be
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
lol, when did i ever say god didn't exist?
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
expected to survive under any conditions. Much less when even the non defective are not surviving. Speaking of defective, I often wonder what goes through the minds of evolutionists when it is seen yet again, that not even the most intelligent intelligences can cause what they believe non intelligence does cause? Interesting concept is, "Extra Intelligence Imbecilic Hyper Proficiency", don't you think? There's only one minor detail that majorly upsets its possible validity. That people such as
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Umm, evolution is so unpredictable, that no intelligent mind could be behind the process, "extra intelligence-imbecilic(an oxymoron) hyper proficiency(a contradiction of imbecilic)," you refer to the concept as "smart stupid extreme proficiency" lol, as in, a conscious mind requires a high intelligence, and a low one, and to be very productive, behind evolution, if you said "conscious intervention lacking change of design for better environmental suiting", then you wouldnt look stupid.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
you & other evolutionists aren't exhibiting any of the required "Hyper Proficiency". It was certainly a very noble "support the underdog" type of gesture. However, it looks as though "imbecilic" will have to remain in the "exceedingly deficient" category. What a shame, after all of the billions of successively accumulative, mutationally defective stages that you guys & your forebearing Amoebian ancestors have been through. Not to mention your current defectively mutated state of existence
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
{we can also observe it naturally, and there is no need for a supernatural being}
That is simply such excessively logical reasoning. Observing evolution naturally, creates only the need to observe it unnaturally. As when observed in the lab experiments you alluded to. You're just so mutationally mentally magnificent. Perhaps I should give defectiveness a try?
{materialists dont provide the highest political support for evo}
The first correct thing you've said. Supernaturalist Loserferians do!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
We have observed it both unaturally and naturally, you have admitted to this. Supernaturalist loserferians don't do shit all in the fuckin politics, neiter do materialist, if you think that it is fucked up that we teach evolution in your country blame the 90% christian board of education that support it, ohh unless they are all luciferian supernaturalists who believe in a natural process to explain the current state of life. I totally give up with you, just fuk off, and s,
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Well that certainly makes 100% pure sense for you to say that the 90% of the board of education that support evolution are Christians. I take it that the other 10% who reject evolution are the non religious.
Absolutely astounding! Now that you have enlightened us all with the realization of that evolution is actually a Biblical, Christian, sacred doctrine, perhaps we should get started on informing all of the vast majority of Christians that aren't aware of their religion's evo teachings?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"you think that it is fucked up that we teach evolution in your country blame the 90% christian board of education that support it" meaning, the board of education, which supports the teaching of evolution, is 90% christian, you nitwit. You should go back to primary school, and do a class in reading, for you cannot understand literature. Which is also why you don't make sense alot, and why you think you are very intelligent, now, give up.
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago