The people who believe in intelligent design are lacking the vision to understand the effect of hundreds of millions of years, and how any species will evolve in response to the changing environment.
Of course, if these fools believe (as so many do) that the world is only 5000 years old, they're not likely to "get" evolution.
Bill Maher may be one of the smartest (living) Americans.
This man loves himself. No wonder there is no room for God in his heart. Intelligent Design implies, simply, that there is a creator. Does not, however, imply religions of the world are correct in their faith. Bill Maher is nothing without religion. Think about that irony!
@MrHouth Without religion,he would just talk about politics. How is he nothing without it? and the reason Intelligent design shouldn't be taught is because it has no evidence supporting it. it is just the opinion of many. you don't teach opinions.
@MrHouth Implying that there's a creator is not (at least according to Occam) a simple proposition. Implying that the natural processes observable around us are the cause of what we observe around us IS a simple proposition. One requires several unjustified (and unjustifiable) assumptions, the other does not.
The people who believe in intelligent design are lacking the vision to understand the effect of hundreds of millions of years, and how any species will evolve in response to the changing environment.
Of course, if these fools believe (as so many do) that the world is only 5000 years old, they're not likely to "get" evolution.
Bill Maher may be one of the smartest (living) Americans.
imillard58 2 weeks ago
This man loves himself. No wonder there is no room for God in his heart. Intelligent Design implies, simply, that there is a creator. Does not, however, imply religions of the world are correct in their faith. Bill Maher is nothing without religion. Think about that irony!
MrHouth 3 weeks ago
@MrHouth Without religion,he would just talk about politics. How is he nothing without it? and the reason Intelligent design shouldn't be taught is because it has no evidence supporting it. it is just the opinion of many. you don't teach opinions.
molyvenson 3 weeks ago
@MrHouth wow just wow, just look at your comment and think hard, this is what religion does to gullible people
sagar246246 3 weeks ago
@MrHouth Implying that there's a creator is not (at least according to Occam) a simple proposition. Implying that the natural processes observable around us are the cause of what we observe around us IS a simple proposition. One requires several unjustified (and unjustifiable) assumptions, the other does not.
shantih433 2 weeks ago
Love it. Thanks.
BluntRapture 3 weeks ago
why the fuck do you people upload these oldass fucking videos like new
imcrazy85 3 weeks ago