now l remember. l saw her a while back here on YouTube. Exactly how did she attain this particular position? She isn't in fact bringing anything new to Rand´s ideas..she´s merely regurgitating them rather poorly and without passion l might add...strange times these are...Rand was correct when she said ´´anyone can take over when there is no real philosophy to speak of´´.
Rand's objectivist movement, once split from the liberal libertarian's altruistic ideals of the government's role in public life, spawned the materialistic 80s with it's love of capitalism and self-interest. It's odd that Republicans who embodied this spirit also found support from the religious right. The marriage of Rand's evangelism and Christian evangelism gave birth to one truly ugly child. I wonder why Republicans have ever since been the biggest spenders even while denounding big govt.
Ayn Rand described what this scholar is doing: definition by non essentials.
Anyone who has read Ayn Rand knows that she rejected anarchism and libertarianism. But Bruns focuses on her influence on them (those who never understood
So only those who want to be misled will miss the relevant points. They will laugh at anecdotes and be pleased to hear that she was just another curious woman with some influence in politics. Problem solved. Really ?
Burns is saying that it was Ayn Rand that kept the modern libertarian movement from going collectivist/socialist- WHAT? Rothbard was an Austrian! What about the Austrians? What about the Jeffersonians? I haven't read her book, but from this it seems that Burns is leaving out the libertarians when she speaks about the libertarians.
oh yeah i'm so glad Rand's ideas saved libertarianism's alliance with the right. at its most radical time, objectivism was there to dilute the anarchy into merely republican rhetoric about markets. then bring in Reagan and the drug war. yay
And from the lineage of Reagan's we get the Bush family. Rand would roll in her grave to see the evagnelical neoconservatism that her ideas helped to promote.
Burns' arguments are about as useful as Rand's. Neither says anything original or historically significant. The libertarian left? Now that made me laugh.
Left libertarians make me lol. I've actually heard one defend government action to right wrongs, and then go on to say forced association is bad. They seem to be one big pile of walking paradox
do you mean like when robert nozick admitted that today's entitlements are historically illegitimate and was forced to advocate a complete redistribution? or maybe we should talk about his belief that government is only legitimate to protect property rights? is health not important?
now l remember. l saw her a while back here on YouTube. Exactly how did she attain this particular position? She isn't in fact bringing anything new to Rand´s ideas..she´s merely regurgitating them rather poorly and without passion l might add...strange times these are...Rand was correct when she said ´´anyone can take over when there is no real philosophy to speak of´´.
freezzertime 1 year ago
I always thought that the right would never really accept Rand due to her Atheism.
uncleavi2002 1 year ago
sorry but i can't listen to her voice! nothing against her or the content of the speech...
johnisfun 2 years ago
Rand's objectivist movement, once split from the liberal libertarian's altruistic ideals of the government's role in public life, spawned the materialistic 80s with it's love of capitalism and self-interest. It's odd that Republicans who embodied this spirit also found support from the religious right. The marriage of Rand's evangelism and Christian evangelism gave birth to one truly ugly child. I wonder why Republicans have ever since been the biggest spenders even while denounding big govt.
MarmaladeINFP 2 years ago
Ayn Rand described what this scholar is doing: definition by non essentials.
Anyone who has read Ayn Rand knows that she rejected anarchism and libertarianism. But Bruns focuses on her influence on them (those who never understood
So only those who want to be misled will miss the relevant points. They will laugh at anecdotes and be pleased to hear that she was just another curious woman with some influence in politics. Problem solved. Really ?
Toohey never solved a problem called Roark
arielbarbero 2 years ago 3
@ arielbarbero
You are very right sir :)
Sam26100 1 year ago
Burns is saying that it was Ayn Rand that kept the modern libertarian movement from going collectivist/socialist- WHAT? Rothbard was an Austrian! What about the Austrians? What about the Jeffersonians? I haven't read her book, but from this it seems that Burns is leaving out the libertarians when she speaks about the libertarians.
titosantucci 2 years ago
oh yeah i'm so glad Rand's ideas saved libertarianism's alliance with the right. at its most radical time, objectivism was there to dilute the anarchy into merely republican rhetoric about markets. then bring in Reagan and the drug war. yay
djyankee251 2 years ago
@djyankee251
That was an awesome summary. :)
And from the lineage of Reagan's we get the Bush family. Rand would roll in her grave to see the evagnelical neoconservatism that her ideas helped to promote.
MarmaladeINFP 2 years ago
nice video
a4finger 2 years ago
Burns' arguments are about as useful as Rand's. Neither says anything original or historically significant. The libertarian left? Now that made me laugh.
BrainBuggered 2 years ago
Left libertarians make me lol. I've actually heard one defend government action to right wrongs, and then go on to say forced association is bad. They seem to be one big pile of walking paradox
TheRealFallenDemon 2 years ago 6
@TheRealFallenDemon
It depends on what kind of left. Many libertarians are social liberals, and not all liberals are for big government.
MarmaladeINFP 2 years ago
do you mean like when robert nozick admitted that today's entitlements are historically illegitimate and was forced to advocate a complete redistribution? or maybe we should talk about his belief that government is only legitimate to protect property rights? is health not important?
fadinboy 2 years ago
I am libertarian and I can't stand people on the right.........or the left for that matter.
PS How is Murray Rothbard "on the left?"
MortuusTyrannus 2 years ago
Great video, sounds like a good book!
HarryNRubin 2 years ago