MR. CECIL TAYLOR. It's so ecstatic, but it's so restrained.
He's is definitely up there with Messiaen, Finnissy and Adams as one of the few people whose piano idiom still sounds completely unique and MODERN. Love it, and very relevant to contemporary music.
cecil went away and hid in the 50s when he heard thelonius munk to go away and practice. he stayed underground throughout the entire heydey of jazz. then he comes back in 80s, top dog once more, except this time he looks like a painter and decorater, skiving, smokin dubies, mashing away haphazard at the keyboard he stubbled across in this poorly heated art dungeon, he is also probably a benefit cheat
well,it doesnt really matter who played free first. during the 50s many experimented with free forms silmutaneously. Ornette,Coltrane,Sun Ra ,George Russell,evn Mingus with Dolphy.Tristano was a prodigy offcourse.But it seems that free jamming was a ragular for jazz musicians then and they saw that another chance for expression was given to them by ignoring the structure.
Cecil is his own cliche. But what a cliche....This guy amazes me still after over 20 years of listening and hearing his rote organizational motives. He never fails to impress with how he can imbue freshness to his method. One of the very greatest musicians of the last and probably this century.
The way I see it, Taylor's brilliance cannot be overstated. I am surprised to hear that he goes back that fa! I don't know a lot about the structure of music, but I can hear that this music is different than Coleman's. Coleman was and is a visionary in his own rite. And Thelonious, however great, didn't deviate too much from bebop. But check into sun ra. Even Cotrane was influenced by Ra. But credit? The only musicians not making the music freer are the reactionaries threatened by brilliance.
j'avoue qu'il est impressionnant , techniquement il est assez monstrueux.. j'adore le jazz mais pas le free jazz . ET la musicalment c 'est vraiment insupportable
This my favorite of his songs. I like the story he is telling from 3:02 to 3:44 very nice!! In fact, I think this passage is variedly used throughout this song.
i don't think cecil taylor has been recognized as a genius in the same way those guys you mention have. And Monk wasn't around much earlier than Cecil was.
Not that I can say wether he is or isn't, it just seems he hasn't made the same huge waves in music as those people, or been as influential to great musicians.
Well, i think he is recognized by other jazz musicians, and has influenced a lot of them. He was doing this style before Ornette Coleman made it famous.
ornette coleman doesn't do this style. he improvises simple melodies that the rhythm section has to account for in its rhythmic and harmonic accompaniment. like i say i really dont know too much about cecils music but im sure it isnt what i've just described.
lennie tristano was the first to play free, he has some amazing recordings with lee konitz that were made in the 40s! i think this is some of the best free playing. the two tracks are called intuition and digression.
You're right, Lenny Tristano was the first to play Free Jazz, but he is also overlooked by the general public. People who really listen to jazz, such as yourself, have a better knowledge of the early influences. Ornette Coleman's style might be different, as is Don Cherry, or Sam Rivers, or The Art Ensemble of Chicago...but the idea is similar.
In every type of music, there are the innovators, and the ones who get credit for doing it
you are right, he has influenced a lot of people in free jazz, but would you say there were the same kind of deliberate influence like monk has done for rhythm and harmony? maybe i should listen more and find out for myself haha
Amazing how this video makes so much more sense to me than when I first saw it 15 years ago. He's expressing such a wide range of complex emotions (craziness, humor, love, tenderness, anger, daring, fear) with doses of structure, chaos, suspense, playfulness and some impressive chops... Damn!
This is a beautiful solo. Twenty years ago, I couldn't understand. But now I feel how piercingly, hauntingly beautiful this piece is. He's really ahead of many of us. I hear a bit of Mussorgsky and bartok in his tune. I agree with you, basswriter, he's a sensitive soul.
I'd love to see the pages he plays from, Flickr has one photo, but it's not clear what it is, it seems he write the name of the notes; in clusters, nests
I appreciate, since I saw him in 1975, his brilliant technique and improvisatory skills but honestly, WTF? What's going on here, musically? Is this something I'd want to hear again and again? Not really.
what I meant is that great music doesn't need labels, I luv jazz too, but I don't care whether something can be called with that name or not, if I like it!!!!!!!
@werciu The descriptions are very useful to those who don't understand. I'd advise you to keep from shouting orders at large masses of blameless youtube users, especially when you aren't absolutely certain of what people should or shouldn't do.
Its an aural and tactile means of creating. I wouldn't call it composition. freejazzfree is right to draw attention to stride and classical piano, but of course it isn't remotely any of these styles. Actually if you listen to a lot of Cecil he loves his own cliches (runs, clusters, ways of creating density) and gets into them over and over again. So yes to stylistic references but no to "this is all written". He improvises - like a mutherfucker!
Anyone can be creative and anyone can be an artist. Denying that denies the point of this music. However, what makes a good artist is personal. I personally believe it takes more talent to be surprisingly creative with standardized rules, or perhaps by the introduction of non-standard ideas that only barely conform to or barely break the usual ones. Call me conservative or what you will, but I believe this because to ignore tradition in art is to ignore art itself. I would not want to devalue it
Good point. However, there is so much you can do with a preset bunch of rules, even wherein a bit of bending is not only possible but necessary. If ignoring tradition to advance the cause of music as art (among other things) is the way to go, then so be it.
If you were 'able to listen' you'd hear that there are rhythms and patterns that repeat throughout the piece. Then he expands on those patterns. Especially during the fast parts, there is a logic behind what notes he hits.
Sure, you can stick to your Chopin, but he's not writing any more music anytime soon.
can you play it in a fashion as convincing as Cecil Taylor? you're not the only one who has shown disdain even Miles Davis jazz's commented "That shit ain't nothing," when asked about his thoughts on Taylor's discography. Here is a man who is clearly capable of playing music your dumbass can recognize i mean he did graduate from a conservatory but because of his conviction at one point received welfare so he could keep his integrity. so seriously who the fuck are you?
the only thing illogical your poor interpretation of My Foolish Heart and Israel. Sadly however, your arrangement of Israel sounds quite similar to Evans' in Explorations...except Evans is actually playing piano while you're beating the shit out of it. You're a very cheap and poor imitation of a master while Cecil Taylor has a sound all to himself. So i say you and your poorly arranged not technique having ass should be banned. good day to you
i know enough not to pass judgment on a legend like cecil taylor. and i know enough to say that your playing and what you call singing is really done in poor taste. you fucking suck. yes that was an insult and a swear.
all you can do is insult me as an attempt to convince me that cecil is a legend? well that stupid attempt isn't going to work. I'm done talking to 4-year-old children
my goodness thank you.... i mean i have nothing against the guy. but freak i mean why would you go on a Cecil Taylor video and talk shit? and im illogical
look chico, it's fine if you don't "get" this music, and it's fine if you don't like it. but be respectful of the man's life work. cecil taylor is widely recognized as an innovator, one of the most influential musician's in modern music. ask yourself what qualifies you to pass judgement on this. it's in our nature to dislike the things that we don't understand. try to recognize this and use some discretion. and understand that you're not convincing anyone; you're only making yourself look bad.
Great! You play piano! Good for you. That doesn't change the fact that this music was composed and purposefully written. Indicated by the fact; the recorded versions are the same as the live versions.
This is the same old debate about modern art. Some people don't get it and don't think it isn't art. That in no way means that it isn't art.
you being condescending doesn't prove that this is composed and purposefully written, and using the argument that some just don't get it is a fallacy in logic
Oh, bah! Every generation blames some sort of music on the so-called destruction of civilization. Fuck that! I'm so glad there's a huge diversity to music all over the world and all over time. It makes life interesting. I'm glad people have the balls to try different and new things.
that look at the end just seemed to be the look of a misunderstood genius, just spacing out after the incredible performance he produced, this guy is the most underrated musician of the second half of the 20th century
i love this clip. i love the sweatsuit and the fact that he looks like some homeless guy who just wandered up to the piano and just let out everything hes ever thought or felt in his life.
Homeless guy? He doesn't look homeless, are you nuts? With his spotless white cap and gray clothes he looks like he's from the future...and that's where he's from muhfuh!
for all you stupid motherfuckers you wouldn't recognize real genius if it was fuckin' you................yittee taw riddin' ittee raw raw riddin'................
I'll rephrase that, solely to express my opinion:
Who's that badass motherfucker of a pianist, composer, and conceptualist? He can't play anything that sounds REMOTELY like shit - it's just too infuckingcredibly awesome!
It'd be epic if someone transcribed this
Chocola127 1 month ago
Comment removed
Chocola127 2 months ago
I would love to jam with Cecil once before I go. I would suck, he would be brilliant, but it would be sublime.
ProteusQ71 2 months ago
There's nothing like a homeless - looking black man from the eighties playing atonal piano.
superkulmedkniv25 2 months ago
bukowski liked classical music, by his own account he was anything but cool
boflynn78 2 months ago
OMG!!!! YOU JUST MADE MY FUCKIN (EXCUSE MY CHOICE OF WORD) DAY! I GUESS THIS IS WHAT THEY MEAN BY GETTING YOUR MIND BLOWN! THANK YOU!
DenCoDom 3 months ago
epic
drewcox010101 4 months ago
I can see why he needs to wear a sweat suit lol What he does looks physically impossible at times.
metemi 5 months ago
truth is beauty, beauty...truth....thank you Mr. Taylor.
mdomanico 7 months ago in playlist Cecil Taylor 2
MR. CECIL TAYLOR. It's so ecstatic, but it's so restrained.
He's is definitely up there with Messiaen, Finnissy and Adams as one of the few people whose piano idiom still sounds completely unique and MODERN. Love it, and very relevant to contemporary music.
SoSleepySoSueMe 7 months ago
yo tambien ago eso & es porke nose tocar el piano xdd
ch1noxs 7 months ago
THank you so much for uploading this video. One of my all time favourite pieces of music, just amazing.
FOWLMUSIC 8 months ago
wwwwwwwwwwooooooooooowwwwwwwwww
robotkarel 8 months ago
Creation!
twistswitch 11 months ago
Comment removed
MrDavis746 11 months ago
Comment removed
MrDavis746 11 months ago
Comment removed
MrDavis746 11 months ago
I like how he just nods at the end.
Megajosh2 11 months ago
Oh my god, he IS god!
Megajosh2 11 months ago
31 people dont have a soul..
CoveredByCats 11 months ago
Full Cocain
jarokasanyi 1 year ago 2
@jarokasanyi or pure enthusiasm
andalltheaces 3 weeks ago
Genius....
Manzeron 1 year ago
he reminds me of Rocky Balboa in that sweat suit....
sippyjuice 1 year ago
Comment removed
oober349 1 year ago
lo mas vacano, disonante loco y controvertido k hayan podido realizar excelente pieza
victorh1962 1 year ago
his fingers are kind of scaring me;;
ClatreHat 1 year ago
@ClatreHat
they're knives into the heart of music.
electrickabuki 1 year ago
I think it's pretty cool to see how jazz evolved from ODJB and NORK to Bix to Goodman to Bird to Davis to Coltrane to this.
OK, I'm done namedropping now.
cholocharile 1 year ago
3:18 - 3:43 is my favorite part along with his facial expressions at the end. Took me a long time to appreciate this music... but now I love it
davidofpiano423 1 year ago
cecil went away and hid in the 50s when he heard thelonius munk to go away and practice. he stayed underground throughout the entire heydey of jazz. then he comes back in 80s, top dog once more, except this time he looks like a painter and decorater, skiving, smokin dubies, mashing away haphazard at the keyboard he stubbled across in this poorly heated art dungeon, he is also probably a benefit cheat
medianode 1 year ago
@medianode
*Monk.
Thelonius MONK.
Next time you try to sound smart, know what you're talking about.
Monsgoose 1 year ago
@Monsgoose ha ha ha
next time you try to sound like a lttile girl, grow a vagina
medianode 1 year ago
cecil taylor is amazing and wonderfull ..
i love free jazz
plonzlc 1 year ago
love this ..
i love free jazz..
plonzlc 1 year ago
pure poetry with no sentimentalism. thanks interplanetaire
noratranvouez 1 year ago
Stunning!!! Notice the contrast of black and white in the video...It gives a sense of solitude that fits the music perfectly... :-|
nickman90gr 1 year ago
makes about as much sense as a wet fart
see the truth
Rab
andifyouhadtwocoats 1 year ago
He's a cat
ZeuhlEmgalai 1 year ago
I get this exact same feeling when playing music except its not as pleasant to the ears haha. Hes just playing whatever he wants.
Ihatelittlefagkids 1 year ago
Pure genius
AltoSaxBoss 1 year ago
does cecil remind anyone else of bubbles from the wire
cuddlesducks 1 year ago 3
You have to see him live to appreciate. The guy has a strong mind. I thought I understood Cecil but what a revelation when I first saw him live
ishta 1 year ago
Comment removed
DanielTievskyRimon 1 year ago
@DanielTievskyRimon Nope. He is free and connecting both voices, his inner (vocal) and outer (piano).
jwklbm326 1 year ago
şarlatan
meredull 1 year ago
I love the white background, it's like a blank canvas...
williamperry11 1 year ago
yes! im not the only one who opens his mouth strangely wide when playing music!
TedEdFred21 1 year ago
well,it doesnt really matter who played free first. during the 50s many experimented with free forms silmutaneously. Ornette,Coltrane,Sun Ra ,George Russell,evn Mingus with Dolphy.Tristano was a prodigy offcourse.But it seems that free jamming was a ragular for jazz musicians then and they saw that another chance for expression was given to them by ignoring the structure.
spaceprophetdogon 1 year ago
Maybe I'm weird, but damn I like it
kuba2111 1 year ago
This guy is not just expressing his thoughts but he is actually going a direction as well.
jazzbummer 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
more garbage from an overrated hack
BetterTasteThanU 1 year ago
@BetterTasteThanU more garbage from a pretentious troll
DaPartnerinDaCrime 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nice sweatshirt dude- i didnt know they had bedazzlers in 1981
OVERRATED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
classic piano douchery
doublejohnson79 1 year ago
5 Stars for Cecil Taylor! You are invited to check out my melodica & piano performances. Enjoy.
marioduenasmusic 1 year ago
5 Stars to Cecil Taylor. You are invited to check out my melodica & piano performances. Enjoy.
marioduenasmusic 1 year ago
I feel like this is how Bukowski would have loved to hear the piano be played.
mchank 1 year ago 2
Cecil is his own cliche. But what a cliche....This guy amazes me still after over 20 years of listening and hearing his rote organizational motives. He never fails to impress with how he can imbue freshness to his method. One of the very greatest musicians of the last and probably this century.
musictflo 1 year ago
doing things people are still catching up to.
spinboydotcom 1 year ago
every artist, no matter the medium, takes something from other artists (especially those that came before him)....
trufiend138 1 year ago
The way I see it, Taylor's brilliance cannot be overstated. I am surprised to hear that he goes back that fa! I don't know a lot about the structure of music, but I can hear that this music is different than Coleman's. Coleman was and is a visionary in his own rite. And Thelonious, however great, didn't deviate too much from bebop. But check into sun ra. Even Cotrane was influenced by Ra. But credit? The only musicians not making the music freer are the reactionaries threatened by brilliance.
benmillerintx 1 year ago
j'avoue qu'il est impressionnant , techniquement il est assez monstrueux.. j'adore le jazz mais pas le free jazz . ET la musicalment c 'est vraiment insupportable
playermusicpiano90 1 year ago
Niesamowity Facet :)
meszugat 1 year ago
Il gagne sa vie en "jouant" comme ça ?
jamesp34 2 years ago
Oui, mais il a été dans le trou pendant un bon moment. C'est du free jazz, Cecil est un des grands du mouvement.
anarchopaperclip 1 year ago
se parece a don ramon
kornflakes3 2 years ago
@kornflakes3 fuckin retard
clifflako 1 year ago
Comment removed
ObamaBinLaden35 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This my favorite of his songs. I like the story he is telling from 3:02 to 3:44 very nice!! In fact, I think this passage is variedly used throughout this song.
wteo340 2 years ago
Comment removed
wteo340 2 years ago
Genius to the 9th power.
NyabinghiJazz 2 years ago 2
Astonishing.
UnexpectedExpressive 2 years ago
All the great geniuses were initially misunderstood: Debussy, Stravinsky, Monk...to name a few.
tomrom7 2 years ago 3
i don't think cecil taylor has been recognized as a genius in the same way those guys you mention have. And Monk wasn't around much earlier than Cecil was.
Not that I can say wether he is or isn't, it just seems he hasn't made the same huge waves in music as those people, or been as influential to great musicians.
soursourapples 2 years ago
Well, i think he is recognized by other jazz musicians, and has influenced a lot of them. He was doing this style before Ornette Coleman made it famous.
tomrom7 2 years ago
ornette coleman doesn't do this style. he improvises simple melodies that the rhythm section has to account for in its rhythmic and harmonic accompaniment. like i say i really dont know too much about cecils music but im sure it isnt what i've just described.
lennie tristano was the first to play free, he has some amazing recordings with lee konitz that were made in the 40s! i think this is some of the best free playing. the two tracks are called intuition and digression.
soursourapples 2 years ago
You're right, Lenny Tristano was the first to play Free Jazz, but he is also overlooked by the general public. People who really listen to jazz, such as yourself, have a better knowledge of the early influences. Ornette Coleman's style might be different, as is Don Cherry, or Sam Rivers, or The Art Ensemble of Chicago...but the idea is similar.
In every type of music, there are the innovators, and the ones who get credit for doing it
tomrom7 2 years ago
yeh i just wish i had the time to listen to all the music. there is some great music on your page.
soursourapples 2 years ago
you are right, he has influenced a lot of people in free jazz, but would you say there were the same kind of deliberate influence like monk has done for rhythm and harmony? maybe i should listen more and find out for myself haha
soursourapples 2 years ago
Amazing. Pure genius.
tomrom7 2 years ago 2
is he screwing up the keys?
jameslo93 2 years ago
Cecil Taylor is a genius !!!
AltoSaxBoss 2 years ago
Amazing how this video makes so much more sense to me than when I first saw it 15 years ago. He's expressing such a wide range of complex emotions (craziness, humor, love, tenderness, anger, daring, fear) with doses of structure, chaos, suspense, playfulness and some impressive chops... Damn!
basswriterNYC 2 years ago 25
This is a beautiful solo. Twenty years ago, I couldn't understand. But now I feel how piercingly, hauntingly beautiful this piece is. He's really ahead of many of us. I hear a bit of Mussorgsky and bartok in his tune. I agree with you, basswriter, he's a sensitive soul.
hellofromchieko 2 years ago 5
@basswriterNYC dear fellow eat rain in space and come back. therofal
therofal 1 year ago
I'd love to see the pages he plays from, Flickr has one photo, but it's not clear what it is, it seems he write the name of the notes; in clusters, nests
herma57 2 years ago
I appreciate, since I saw him in 1975, his brilliant technique and improvisatory skills but honestly, WTF? What's going on here, musically? Is this something I'd want to hear again and again? Not really.
I guess I don't "get it."
LazlosPlane 2 years ago
Mind blowing and brilliant!!
organdude44 2 years ago
What would be the best way to study harmonies
1234acbe 2 years ago
listen listen listen
take music theory
listen listen listen some more
nepalnt21 2 years ago 3
I agree this isnt "JAZZ!!"
kekilicious11 2 years ago
who the fuck cares??????
Robusto103 2 years ago
Watch your language... n I do.. I love jazz..
kekilicious11 2 years ago
what I meant is that great music doesn't need labels, I luv jazz too, but I don't care whether something can be called with that name or not, if I like it!!!!!!!
Robusto103 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no offense... but he isn't good any way ;(
kekilicious11 2 years ago
well, that's your opinion. Personally, I love him!!!!!!!!! XP
Robusto103 2 years ago
Hell!!
rekingooo 2 years ago
what is jazz????
i think that nodoby can answer that question...
I like the idea that it's a way of creation and expression trough the music.
Its jazz for me and that why i love jazz
(sry for my bad english)
maxigoodvibes 2 years ago
Guys ! Stop talking !Just listen! You want to describe everything !
werciu 2 years ago 25
@werciu It's OK to try to put into words how you feel about something...
153redankh 11 months ago 3
@werciu The descriptions are very useful to those who don't understand. I'd advise you to keep from shouting orders at large masses of blameless youtube users, especially when you aren't absolutely certain of what people should or shouldn't do.
robbayay 8 months ago
Its an aural and tactile means of creating. I wouldn't call it composition. freejazzfree is right to draw attention to stride and classical piano, but of course it isn't remotely any of these styles. Actually if you listen to a lot of Cecil he loves his own cliches (runs, clusters, ways of creating density) and gets into them over and over again. So yes to stylistic references but no to "this is all written". He improvises - like a mutherfucker!
MrThelonious 2 years ago
essentially cecil composes songs for each performance he does.every piece he does is composed the way a piece unfolds involves improvisation.
cecil is always playing one song essentially. one that has many different variables.
this is his music. he has his own system.
it involves a synthesis of scalular patterns that also act as a basis for harmonic information.
i find that there is romanticism in his composition.particularly related to the impressionist/romantic composers of the 20th century.
freejazzfree 2 years ago
for someone who plays piano to exclaim that this performance is filled with random notes and is just plunking down... you need some ear training.
theres tons of repetition and development.
this is all written.
cecil doesnt 'free improvise'
in fact alot of the repeating figures are taking alot from stride and classical piano.
the hammered clusters are an expansion of melodic frames of reference.
cecil works with unit structures.range areas which he modulates certain themes through.
freejazzfree 2 years ago
fuck you CECIL IS BEYOND
17205513 2 years ago
Toda una vida de trabajo y sentimiento.. Qué pasada.
cinedeguerrilla 2 years ago
chico: you are pathetic.... but besides that, when your groundbreaking record comes out which will blow the musicworlds mind?
ebutuoy020 2 years ago
Anyone can be creative and anyone can be an artist. Denying that denies the point of this music. However, what makes a good artist is personal. I personally believe it takes more talent to be surprisingly creative with standardized rules, or perhaps by the introduction of non-standard ideas that only barely conform to or barely break the usual ones. Call me conservative or what you will, but I believe this because to ignore tradition in art is to ignore art itself. I would not want to devalue it
wolffrankenstein 2 years ago
Which isn't to say I don't enjoy listening to Cecil Taylor's music! I don't really prefer it, but, man, has this guy got some interesting technique!
wolffrankenstein 2 years ago
Good point. However, there is so much you can do with a preset bunch of rules, even wherein a bit of bending is not only possible but necessary. If ignoring tradition to advance the cause of music as art (among other things) is the way to go, then so be it.
Israfvel 2 years ago
Hey Chico,
If you were 'able to listen' you'd hear that there are rhythms and patterns that repeat throughout the piece. Then he expands on those patterns. Especially during the fast parts, there is a logic behind what notes he hits.
Sure, you can stick to your Chopin, but he's not writing any more music anytime soon.
Bambiezbotron 2 years ago
i am able, are u?
chicoflaco 2 years ago
can you play it in a fashion as convincing as Cecil Taylor? you're not the only one who has shown disdain even Miles Davis jazz's commented "That shit ain't nothing," when asked about his thoughts on Taylor's discography. Here is a man who is clearly capable of playing music your dumbass can recognize i mean he did graduate from a conservatory but because of his conviction at one point received welfare so he could keep his integrity. so seriously who the fuck are you?
flippenpinoi 2 years ago
why do they let swearing illogical people on here? ban this clown
chicoflaco 2 years ago
the only thing illogical your poor interpretation of My Foolish Heart and Israel. Sadly however, your arrangement of Israel sounds quite similar to Evans' in Explorations...except Evans is actually playing piano while you're beating the shit out of it. You're a very cheap and poor imitation of a master while Cecil Taylor has a sound all to himself. So i say you and your poorly arranged not technique having ass should be banned. good day to you
flippenpinoi 2 years ago
you have no clue about anything, all you can do is insult and swear
chicoflaco 2 years ago
i know enough not to pass judgment on a legend like cecil taylor. and i know enough to say that your playing and what you call singing is really done in poor taste. you fucking suck. yes that was an insult and a swear.
flippenpinoi 2 years ago
all you can do is insult me as an attempt to convince me that cecil is a legend? well that stupid attempt isn't going to work. I'm done talking to 4-year-old children
chicoflaco 2 years ago
no all i do is insult you as an attempt to insult you. that and i find you fascinating. a wanna be Bill Evans with no touch or technique
flippenpinoi 2 years ago
you no nothing about music obviously, and again with the insults, grow up
chicoflaco 2 years ago
Lol. Your comments rule!!!! Chico sucks ass!!!
detayl03 2 years ago
my goodness thank you.... i mean i have nothing against the guy. but freak i mean why would you go on a Cecil Taylor video and talk shit? and im illogical
flippenpinoi 2 years ago
look chico, it's fine if you don't "get" this music, and it's fine if you don't like it. but be respectful of the man's life work. cecil taylor is widely recognized as an innovator, one of the most influential musician's in modern music. ask yourself what qualifies you to pass judgement on this. it's in our nature to dislike the things that we don't understand. try to recognize this and use some discretion. and understand that you're not convincing anyone; you're only making yourself look bad.
sanjusanjusanju 2 years ago
i don't like it, just like i hate mushrooms
chicoflaco 2 years ago
..well if you are able to listen, you will find that it is not random at all...
autovern 2 years ago
if you are able to listen, you will find that there is a lot of random notes hit
chicoflaco 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chico, you are a piece of shit!
nakedjesus12 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
random notes and random disjointed tempos is noise to me
chicoflaco 2 years ago
i agree, thats why im educatin myself. cause i know its not actualy
thesnobsupreme 2 years ago
Its not random. Listen to Ornette Coleman, Peter Brotzmann, Cecil Taylor and other free jazz greats. This stuff was composed and rehearsed.
detoth67 2 years ago
I play piano, don't kid yourself, this is plunking down whatever notes you happen to hit
chicoflaco 2 years ago
Great! You play piano! Good for you. That doesn't change the fact that this music was composed and purposefully written. Indicated by the fact; the recorded versions are the same as the live versions.
This is the same old debate about modern art. Some people don't get it and don't think it isn't art. That in no way means that it isn't art.
detoth67 2 years ago
you being condescending doesn't prove that this is composed and purposefully written, and using the argument that some just don't get it is a fallacy in logic
chicoflaco 2 years ago
yeah lets see you make free jazz sound that good.
lordamasa 2 years ago
my ear doesn't think it sounds good, but if it works for you...
chicoflaco 2 years ago
im having vision right now
karoloandria 2 years ago
Comment removed
curleysloth 2 years ago
Oh, bah! Every generation blames some sort of music on the so-called destruction of civilization. Fuck that! I'm so glad there's a huge diversity to music all over the world and all over time. It makes life interesting. I'm glad people have the balls to try different and new things.
Pomeray8 2 years ago 4
simple gorgeous. many thanks.
iperuranioangela 2 years ago
I got to 1:42 before posting this. This is fucking awesome. It should be an inspiration to you even if you don't like it: he is being himself.
Lafoliex7 2 years ago
that look at the end just seemed to be the look of a misunderstood genius, just spacing out after the incredible performance he produced, this guy is the most underrated musician of the second half of the 20th century
09090707 2 years ago
uplifting
mahoose6 2 years ago
excuse me all... what genre do you call this music?
oliverkhoo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you fucking ignorant...
sempugas 2 years ago
just music
ttoe 2 years ago 2
i call this Music, in particular i call him a Genius
JohnPatatino 2 years ago
Most people would call it "Free Jazz"
masonchapple 2 years ago 4
SuperB
1S15FReud 2 years ago
Ah, public television; still fairly surprising.
Euroflounder 2 years ago
This is awesome.
3:30, are you sure you didn't hit fast forward, that's going too fast.
homestarfan2008 2 years ago
Real PSIchiatermusic,indeed!
PSIchiater 2 years ago
ya le dio la chiripiolka
exelent video
free free free
fatherfocus 2 years ago
peas to teh gawd.
saw him a few months ago. i sat in the very back- no mics and i could still hear him growling over the piano the whole time he played.
smegghiggins 2 years ago
i saw this on tv when i was 15. it changed everything for me ... total freedom.
biotonk 2 years ago
lost your mind and
you were in mentalhospital?
vihtorik 2 years ago
is that how this music makes you feel vihtorik ?
biotonk 2 years ago
almost
vihtorik 2 years ago
They actually put this on TV?
Euroflounder 2 years ago
yes ... i saw it on PBS sometime in the mid 80's
biotonk 2 years ago
Grosso!, un Capo del Free
misterpece 2 years ago
Genius.
mahoose6 2 years ago
he really doesn't need those charts, the music is written on the back of his eyelids...
bardobound 2 years ago
i love this clip. i love the sweatsuit and the fact that he looks like some homeless guy who just wandered up to the piano and just let out everything hes ever thought or felt in his life.
tomatwood 2 years ago 4
lol, fantastic description
tothemax91 2 years ago
Homeless guy? He doesn't look homeless, are you nuts? With his spotless white cap and gray clothes he looks like he's from the future...and that's where he's from muhfuh!
douqep 2 years ago
yerp yerp
hcsk6 2 years ago
thanks for keeping this clip up. one of my favorite piano performances on youtube.
bobohidalgo 2 years ago
i wonder if he played for mr rogers
mikemcnellyf 2 years ago
for some reason i absolutely love this even though it sounds completely wrong and random to me... what the hell
ThreeLeggedMongoose 2 years ago
that was very special
IloveAlexisBledel689 2 years ago
for all you stupid motherfuckers you wouldn't recognize real genius if it was fuckin' you................yittee taw riddin' ittee raw raw riddin'................
mountaintop1234 2 years ago
For all you stupid motherfuckers you wouldn't recognize reall genius if it was fuckin' you.................
mountaintop1234 2 years ago
Now what does that mean?
zyruemusic 2 years ago
I'd love to see this man play live! ...which mental institution does he live in ?
PiazzollaDev 2 years ago
He looks out of breath at the end
uncoolbeans 3 years ago
It reminds me of his album FLY! FLY! FLY! FLY! FLY! This is a great clip.
decode135 3 years ago
Off-beat like the white girl shoulder dance
simplelife88393 3 years ago
Structure them units, bay-bee!
-Dick Vitale
imminy 3 years ago
I'll rephrase that, solely to express my opinion:
Who's that badass motherfucker of a pianist, composer, and conceptualist? He can't play anything that sounds REMOTELY like shit - it's just too infuckingcredibly awesome!
AVHeimerski 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Who's that motherfucker? He can't play shit!
kaschte 3 years ago
lol i fucking love this guy.
StevieLeeRachel 3 years ago 3