Added: 4 years ago
From: JohnTPaff
Views: 2,855
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • As a future Parliamentarian, I am DISGUSTED that this would happen.

  • One seconds a motion - - not a nomination, as is heard here. And no seconded motion was made to the motion to close nominations.

    I guess if one wants to nominate someone and have them voted on first, they'd better be fast talkers!

  • Well who cares anymore just show up and collect a check, wing-it however you want and call it job well done.

  • That's plain stupid. The motion to close the nomination needs to be seconded and should have at least a majority vote.

  • Also, there is also the issue of conflict of interest involved in this scam.

  • I didn't hear anyone second to close the nominations... Did I miss that? I also thought that there should be a vote on both nominees. But I guess they could assume that the no's would have voted for the other individual and it wouldn't have been enough?? Definitely studying these more.

  • Wow... would of been hard to believe if I hadn't heard this for myself.

  • Very sad display of ignorance. These are the people charged with representing us in matters of real importance!!!

  • Bastards.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more