I didn't hear anyone second to close the nominations... Did I miss that? I also thought that there should be a vote on both nominees. But I guess they could assume that the no's would have voted for the other individual and it wouldn't have been enough?? Definitely studying these more.
As a future Parliamentarian, I am DISGUSTED that this would happen.
jrwhippet 11 months ago
One seconds a motion - - not a nomination, as is heard here. And no seconded motion was made to the motion to close nominations.
I guess if one wants to nominate someone and have them voted on first, they'd better be fast talkers!
baystategal 2 years ago
Well who cares anymore just show up and collect a check, wing-it however you want and call it job well done.
Cabanas751Dunhill 3 years ago
That's plain stupid. The motion to close the nomination needs to be seconded and should have at least a majority vote.
RAMPKORV 3 years ago
Also, there is also the issue of conflict of interest involved in this scam.
RAMPKORV 3 years ago
I didn't hear anyone second to close the nominations... Did I miss that? I also thought that there should be a vote on both nominees. But I guess they could assume that the no's would have voted for the other individual and it wouldn't have been enough?? Definitely studying these more.
CharityAngel 3 years ago
Wow... would of been hard to believe if I hadn't heard this for myself.
gpalmer7 4 years ago 2
Very sad display of ignorance. These are the people charged with representing us in matters of real importance!!!
seeker77777 4 years ago 3
Bastards.
UnionCountyWatchdog 4 years ago