Sorry, I'm not a musician, but I'd like to know what it is he plays as the very last, first time around I heard a powerful minor chord (which would be funny since most baaroque pieces end with a major chord), but now I think Horowitz played no chord at all, leaving the auditor to decide whether to hear it major or minor!
Dieses Choralpraeludium ist ein Ruf nach Gott in der Dunkelheit des Weltalls.-Der Ruf bleibt ohne Antwort.Das F-Dur des Schlussakkords bringt kaum Licht in die Finsternis.Das Stueck ist verwandt mit der dreistimmigen Invention in f-moll.
@baptistic You are right.-There is neither the third "a" nor "a flat", just a plain " f ", as far as I hear.- Anyhow, a simple " f " tends to create a "major-like" atmosphere due to physics ( overtones ).-Nevertheless the Horowitz version is not really optimistic regarding a Happy End.
Yes i can understand why everyone would go for the superpianists Horowitz, Sokolov etc without any doubt they are the gods, however if you really really like this piece played on piano and it speaks to your soul, check out Tatiana Nikolayeva
Peut-être la meilleure interprétation qui soit avec celle de Dinu Lippati de ce magnifique choral de Bach. Mais écoutez celle de Samson François : une des plus belles qui soient aussi. Je les préfère en tout cas à celles de Solokov, Richter, Kempf et de bien d'autres.
Horowitzt understands this piece more than every other pianist I' ve heard! He plays it not too slow, sentimental and pretentious. He is alone with God and doesn't want any more.
This is the main theme in the russian movie "Solaris" (by Andrej Tarkovskij). It was in this movie I first heard this composition. It became one of my favourite bach compositions immediately.
ah that sound...... much better than in later years. as horowitz was at his best at that time. I prefer this version to the famous Lipatti version..... but thats personal opinion. both are great.
This piece is the product of my brilliance, engendered in my genius then projected back through time and embedded into the conscience of Bach, who was consequently obliged to carry out my will under pain of interminable sufferings.
@smokinbill The Lipatti recording is still up. The copy/paste function isn't working for me, but you can find it if you simply search YouTube for "Dinu Lippati" and then look for Bach Chorale Prelude.
However, the Horowitz version is hardly "horrid." Each performer plays this work well, albeit lacking the color that the sound has on the organ, for which it was written. DL's measured trills were, unfortunately, the way that Baroque music was taught during his time.
I really liked your video and your channel. If you need any help getting this video or channel exposed I use a site called tubeviews.(net) It has really helped like 20 of my main videos get to the top in position. God Bless!
S.one who compared horowitz' and Lipatti's perfofmance of this piece would be as senseless as one who tried to show that sky is more beautiful than sea or vice versa
The two versions, D and Maestro V: V goes for a pianissimo fond and has eccentric ornamentation, D's touch much heavier but with a more articulated layering strategy. Each implodes slightly at the tall order of being both discplined and romantic: a problem-set only PARTIALLY resolved by a Gouldian (transcending-the-issue) approach. The latest D version (qv)commenter misconsrues my organ remark re GG incidentally: G avoids the overtly religious,in order to be so OBLIQUELY thus repertoire choix MS
The composition by Bach was written for organ, Busoni transscribed it from the "Orgelbüchlein". The englisch translation of the title is "I am calling to you, Lord Jesus Christ".
Both, the choral and its arrangement, are rather contemplative than sad.
if if any music makes you feel sad it's because you have been conditioned to react to certain stimulus in a certain way. for me this is a very beautiful piece of music so listening to it makes me happy! yay!
This is also on Horowitz, discovered treasures cd, with Scarlatti, Clementi, Chopin . I have worn out 3 copies. This piece brings out an un-measurable sadness. Ive put it on infinite repeat and listened for hours. I only wish it was 20 minutes long. This version is from a Busoni arrangement.
This interpretation of the famous Chorale Prelude is the best I have heard for the piano. It is clear in its detatails and played by an artist who made the piano sound almost like the organ.
It was written for the organ, another keyboard instrument. Composers around Bach's time were not specific as to which instrument to play this piece on. Keyboards were pretty much interchangeable, although sacred music was normally played on the organ and secular music was usually played on the harpsichord.
@BayAreaBiker2001 As generalizations, off the mark. If the work included a pedal part (to be played with the feet), it was an organ work, not a harpsichord work. While many harpsichord works were secular in nature (Suites and Partitas, e.g.), the harpsichord was also used as a keyboard continuo instrument in sacred works, including cantatas and oratorios.
Sorry, I'm not a musician, but I'd like to know what it is he plays as the very last, first time around I heard a powerful minor chord (which would be funny since most baaroque pieces end with a major chord), but now I think Horowitz played no chord at all, leaving the auditor to decide whether to hear it major or minor!
baptistic 1 month ago
utterly depressing..... but uttterly brilliant!
MrTomt1990 1 month ago
Dieses Choralpraeludium ist ein Ruf nach Gott in der Dunkelheit des Weltalls.-Der Ruf bleibt ohne Antwort.Das F-Dur des Schlussakkords bringt kaum Licht in die Finsternis.Das Stueck ist verwandt mit der dreistimmigen Invention in f-moll.
prinzparsiphal777 2 months ago
@prinzparsiphal777 But does Horowitz actually close with the F major chord?
baptistic 1 month ago
@baptistic You are right.-There is neither the third "a" nor "a flat", just a plain " f ", as far as I hear.- Anyhow, a simple " f " tends to create a "major-like" atmosphere due to physics ( overtones ).-Nevertheless the Horowitz version is not really optimistic regarding a Happy End.
prinzparsiphal777 1 month ago
@prinzparsiphal777 Koennen Sie erklaeren was fuer Verhaeltnis gibt es zwischen die beide Stuecke?
baptistic 1 month ago
@baptistic Die dreitoenige,staendig wiederholte Figur ist ein Leidensmotiv in der Musik von Bach.Dreistimmige Invention in f-moll.
prinzparsiphal777 1 month ago
Before hitting the switch to start the Big Bang, the Old Man played this piece, anticipating all the sufferings of mankind.-
noestetchynghando 2 months ago 7
@noestetchynghando :) Your comment has pure poetry!
rafaelpianoba 2 months ago
Man alone with God.- If this recording does not touch you, listen to Tatiana Nikolayeva.-
(4:40 minutes !)
noestetchynghando 2 months ago
Yes i can understand why everyone would go for the superpianists Horowitz, Sokolov etc without any doubt they are the gods, however if you really really like this piece played on piano and it speaks to your soul, check out Tatiana Nikolayeva
Dougol1 2 months ago
Peut-être la meilleure interprétation qui soit avec celle de Dinu Lippati de ce magnifique choral de Bach. Mais écoutez celle de Samson François : une des plus belles qui soient aussi. Je les préfère en tout cas à celles de Solokov, Richter, Kempf et de bien d'autres.
bnardish 3 months ago
@bnardish Ecoutez Tatiana Nikolayeva.-
noestetchynghando 2 months ago
ITS NOT HORROWITZ. LIAR
phosphore222 5 months ago
@phosphore222 it sure is
leongatha96 3 months ago
СОЛЯРИС!
userr600 5 months ago
Horowitzt understands this piece more than every other pianist I' ve heard! He plays it not too slow, sentimental and pretentious. He is alone with God and doesn't want any more.
janacek0570 5 months ago
Emozionante
robertocasitenore 5 months ago
This sounds so out of tune after listening to real organ. Its amazing...
ym42ym42 6 months ago
Lovely.
paulostroff99 7 months ago
Bravo!....
mokacode 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I like it , it was very good.
sam0xin 7 months ago
Comment removed
sam0xin 7 months ago
I can't help it, but i think Busoni ruined the piece with the heavy left hand transcription and romantic approach. What a pity.
pbazant 9 months ago in playlist BWV 639
@pbazant I agree , ruined however is a strong word . Perhaps used a different hue to paint the same view ?
thefatpenguin2003 7 months ago 2
nice for piano as wel expecially played by Horowitz, even tough original organ version is way better, that in the "orgelbüchlein"
HiiPPi3 11 months ago
herodot2 yeah I got 10 children dead but hey I´ve still got 10 left so that´s all right.
I belñieve at least one of them , Johann Christian , actually developed his musical talents with quite some success.
bonsema1 1 year ago
herodot2 yes but he procreated as if he were a catholic rabbit, he sired at least 20 children....that´s OK , he was a supergifted.
bonsema1 1 year ago
@bonsema1 half of them died
LambChowder1 1 year ago
" Ich ruf zu Dir" is as deeply Christian as it gets.
Horowitz is a great artist bt was not brought up with Chrisianity.
I mean give me the catholic Dinu Lipatti any time ; he nails it.
But then again the music is a prayer to a Jew.
bonsema1 1 year ago
@bonsema1
Bach was Lutheran though...
herodot2 1 year ago
que c'est superbe !
rosepiano1 1 year ago
Bach well-played sounds like a prayer - and he got it! :>
mylovelylittleone 1 year ago 3
I got addicted to this peace because of the movie Solaris (of tarkovsky)
ClaudeFrollon 1 year ago
@ClaudeFrollon Same! A gorgeous piece of music for a gorgeous movie.
enemyofbohemia 1 year ago
al 1:39 e' grandioso
goldberg72 1 year ago
This is the main theme in the russian movie "Solaris" (by Andrej Tarkovskij). It was in this movie I first heard this composition. It became one of my favourite bach compositions immediately.
gonrolgonrol 1 year ago
MASTERPIECE!
Brings a tear to my eye when I think of the time that has gone by.
everydaywarriors 1 year ago
Reverent.
Edbrye2008 1 year ago 2
I really like how this is played, is much slower , better/good/magnificent!
esteff22 1 year ago
embora seja Bach, este movimento largo mais parece um Nourno : tão romantico, tão Chopin.....
caiu bem nesta manhã de luz e paz.
bom dia, Sat!
ducarvalho 2 years ago
Bellissimo e tristissimo insieme.
Du kanst rufen, maar er komt echt geen antwoord terug. Ormai lo so con certezza e ne piango insieme a Vladimir.
iagus100 2 years ago
ah that sound...... much better than in later years. as horowitz was at his best at that time. I prefer this version to the famous Lipatti version..... but thats personal opinion. both are great.
uhartchristian 2 years ago
This piece is the product of my brilliance, engendered in my genius then projected back through time and embedded into the conscience of Bach, who was consequently obliged to carry out my will under pain of interminable sufferings.
monobrowperson 2 years ago
kookoo.
kasyapa 2 years ago
His expression, though, is exquisite!
metteholm75 2 years ago
this is horrid compared to the dinu lipatti version; but I think someone took that one down.
smokinbill 2 years ago
@smokinbill
Why?
herodot2 1 year ago
@herodot2 cause there's no emotion in this version - at least none compared to the dinu one, who performed it knowing he was going to die.
It just tears your heart out it's so beautiful.
smokinbill 1 year ago
@smokinbill The Lipatti recording is still up. The copy/paste function isn't working for me, but you can find it if you simply search YouTube for "Dinu Lippati" and then look for Bach Chorale Prelude.
However, the Horowitz version is hardly "horrid." Each performer plays this work well, albeit lacking the color that the sound has on the organ, for which it was written. DL's measured trills were, unfortunately, the way that Baroque music was taught during his time.
GeoffreySimonOnline 10 months ago
Stellar. I was just wondering earlier how this would sound on instruments other than the organ...and here I go.
handsomechuck1 2 years ago
Amazing
TheRussian1989 2 years ago 3
hasta donde yo sabia la transcripcion de este coral fue hecha por Reger
gris131 2 years ago
superb legato.............
very beautifull thank for posing!
kempff95 2 years ago 3
magnificent!!!
Thanks Isis Forever
Brian
InterBrian 2 years ago
probably the loneliest piece i've ever heard
ForeverIsis 2 years ago 24
yes!
klausknulp 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
Fox500000 2 years ago
@ForeverIsis
/watch?v=5KFRauuSs8k&list=PL26535C89C78DD4CB
RemovdSande11 8 months ago in playlist Bach/Mahler
I am idicted by the sound of Horowitz. It started when I was 6 years old and will probably never end.
klausknulp 2 years ago 4
Likewise I have been indicted of Horowitz addiction, and indications point to no furlough.
BrucknerMotet 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I really liked your video and your channel. If you need any help getting this video or channel exposed I use a site called tubeviews.(net) It has really helped like 20 of my main videos get to the top in position. God Bless!
I love every aspect of this video!
Rowanqwe 2 years ago
S.one who compared horowitz' and Lipatti's perfofmance of this piece would be as senseless as one who tried to show that sky is more beautiful than sea or vice versa
pianofolle 3 years ago 23
agreed!
Perseus12345678 2 years ago
good comparison!!!!
rafaelpianoba 2 years ago
Comment removed
88alan8800 1 year ago
@pianofolle how wonderful of you to say! : D
88alan8800 1 year ago
@pianofolle Well said!!
hermanshermits124124 1 year ago
@hermanshermits124124
I agree with my whole "me"...
With respect,
Jan.
janvkimm 1 year ago
@pianofolle
Probably. But there are sky-types and sea-types.
herodot2 1 year ago
Listen to Ann Herlong, a very moving performance.
periklesmeier 3 years ago
The two versions, D and Maestro V: V goes for a pianissimo fond and has eccentric ornamentation, D's touch much heavier but with a more articulated layering strategy. Each implodes slightly at the tall order of being both discplined and romantic: a problem-set only PARTIALLY resolved by a Gouldian (transcending-the-issue) approach. The latest D version (qv)commenter misconsrues my organ remark re GG incidentally: G avoids the overtly religious,in order to be so OBLIQUELY thus repertoire choix MS
MFMSMITH 3 years ago
The composition by Bach was written for organ, Busoni transscribed it from the "Orgelbüchlein". The englisch translation of the title is "I am calling to you, Lord Jesus Christ".
Both, the choral and its arrangement, are rather contemplative than sad.
2lipsonmy0rgan 3 years ago 4
This is a very happy song to me. Where does the sadness spring forth?
pvehling 3 years ago
how can it be shown for a blind man? :(
mephaz85 3 years ago
if if any music makes you feel sad it's because you have been conditioned to react to certain stimulus in a certain way. for me this is a very beautiful piece of music so listening to it makes me happy! yay!
aatz1982 3 years ago
the same could be applied to you: whenever you feel happy, it must be conditioned by some typical mechanism which is activated by the stimulus.
the question is whether it is normal to feel happy about naturally sad things.
mephaz85 3 years ago
well that's certainly a question, but a fairly daft one
aatz1982 2 years ago
This is also on Horowitz, discovered treasures cd, with Scarlatti, Clementi, Chopin . I have worn out 3 copies. This piece brings out an un-measurable sadness. Ive put it on infinite repeat and listened for hours. I only wish it was 20 minutes long. This version is from a Busoni arrangement.
btpolitic 3 years ago
This is fantastically beautiful and emotional in an elevated way
billabongxv 3 years ago
This interpretation of the famous Chorale Prelude is the best I have heard for the piano. It is clear in its detatails and played by an artist who made the piano sound almost like the organ.
Kallestina 3 years ago
So sad and supremely beautiful... Listen to the Dinu Lipatti version as well. Equally masterful.
musicdivinemusic 3 years ago
I complettlyu agree with aewanko300. I keep this for days of rain and sorrow to be like a balm of soul.
kristallon100 3 years ago
NYC, June 12 1969
It's a private LP commissioned by Goodyear for Christmas
calibardo 3 years ago
His sound... It´s like an organ!
volodya75 3 years ago 3
It was written for the organ, another keyboard instrument. Composers around Bach's time were not specific as to which instrument to play this piece on. Keyboards were pretty much interchangeable, although sacred music was normally played on the organ and secular music was usually played on the harpsichord.
BayAreaBiker2001 3 years ago
@BayAreaBiker2001 As generalizations, off the mark. If the work included a pedal part (to be played with the feet), it was an organ work, not a harpsichord work. While many harpsichord works were secular in nature (Suites and Partitas, e.g.), the harpsichord was also used as a keyboard continuo instrument in sacred works, including cantatas and oratorios.
GeoffreySimonOnline 10 months ago
Percy Grainger played this piece very well. A live performance was preserved on the Pearl label.
stan724 3 years ago
probably the loneliest piece i've ever heard
aewanko300 3 years ago 4
what year was this played in?
waytoocool 3 years ago 2
Sorry, but I don´t no!
rafaelpianoba 3 years ago 2
NYC June 12 1969
It's a private LP commissioned by an industry for Christmas
calibardo 3 years ago
NYC, June 12, 1969
It's a private LP commisioned by Goodyear for Christmas
calibardo 3 years ago
@waytoocool According to the fansite: 12 June 1969
FinrodFR 6 months ago